I must disagree with the other comments on this page. Although a good remake, I love the original. Having seen some of Christopher Eccleston's works, I thought the way he acted in the video was brilliant. The beginning seemed so sorrowful and the end so happy. The contrasts were bigger in the original. I like your version as well, but to me it can't compare to Christopher's brilliance
besides being fairly ugly and not too fussed about people seeing the details in my face, it was shot on a webcam (with infinity focus) for the purposes of the demo. ta 4 feedback tho.
Very good, some of the best concepts are this simple.
zondervanamo 1 year ago
i really like this version, even the camera quality...nice :)
77ROYO 1 year ago
So, this guy directed the Kloot video?
TheMightyFiction 1 year ago 2
@TheMightyFiction - yes indeed
retinacircus 1 year ago
it's nice to see how much of a difference a slow zoom in can make
vertibelle 2 years ago
you just look hangover mate
pennywhistlepoem 2 years ago 5
Lovely!!!!!So natural!!
eichpos 2 years ago
first, he blinks too much. Second, it's blurry. Third, Eccleston looks so awesome!
lbotez 2 years ago
its blurry because its the directors cut.
bluemonkey7345 1 year ago
I must disagree with the other comments on this page. Although a good remake, I love the original. Having seen some of Christopher Eccleston's works, I thought the way he acted in the video was brilliant. The beginning seemed so sorrowful and the end so happy. The contrasts were bigger in the original. I like your version as well, but to me it can't compare to Christopher's brilliance
patty803 2 years ago 2
it's not a remake - this was the original idea!
retinacircus 2 years ago 4
Meh. The original video is way better than this one.
tangenfamily 2 years ago
i like this video a lot. its better than the original. it gives more feeling, the man in the original video is to cold, even scary :D
but yeah, i have to smile back at the end of both videos :)
gelbemilka 2 years ago
There is a big diference betweeen BEING A FILMMAKER AND A FAMOUS RED CARPET FILMMAKER.
taking audience attention with a fake title is a bad way of publicity.
Points off.
mateomedina 3 years ago
i like this more then the original.
mdietzns 3 years ago
ROFL!
Soytugitana 3 years ago
Haha great video, i had to laugh though, because you blinked 4 times in very short time and in the actual video he doesn't blink :P!
Finesky 3 years ago
He does. 1:44
AlinePraline5 3 years ago
Comment removed
schmadam71 1 year ago
@Finesky Christopher Eccleston does blink in the actual video - at least twice. Perhaps you happened to blink at the same time and missed it ;)
schmadam71 1 year ago 2
I think it's beautiful.
MusicVideoAccount 3 years ago
i've got a another drink and you are ugly but fuck it so's every one else, sick manchester
tanglewoodfretboard 3 years ago
interesting to get an idea of how it developed, cheers for putting it up!
favouritesky 4 years ago 2
you might wanna get urself in focus so the audience would notice the details in your face...
TermiATT 5 years ago
besides being fairly ugly and not too fussed about people seeing the details in my face, it was shot on a webcam (with infinity focus) for the purposes of the demo. ta 4 feedback tho.
retinacircus 5 years ago
I think it works better than the one with renta-manc Christopher Eccleston actually.
sennen3 5 years ago
Sorry, I disagree I'd rent that Manc in a second given the chance. ;-)
Although I do like this version as well. Very cute smile at the end! :-)
missmad691 5 years ago 2
Tis cute smile - found myself smiling back! ;)
Badgegirl 4 years ago 7