Moon Mysteries Investigated 2

[theawsomnessdude]

I feel sorry for the moon.

[jOdieeeiLy]

i wanna see a square planet

[saladdogger]

Astrobiologist ??? wow what a job no material to study just speculate to your hearts content. Be tempting to just make it up wouldent it?.

[attractivue]

When Earth was spinning faster than today then does it mean we had low gravity back in those days?

[amtek666]

Lets all do the math.

Distance from earth to moon -384000km.

Moon moving away at 4cm year (get your calculators kids) 1km=100000cm

100000cm divided by 4cm = 25000cm

Which puts an earth moon collision at 3.84 Billion years ago. See easy............

[dbogdanovic1987]

the first and the second part are the same. the third one is missing...

[InhumanCondition]

If the moon was 15 times closer would that not place it within the Roche limit? How could it reamin intact?

[Amorphustruth]

Sorry but i think this is bullshit, just a load of theories! They have very liitle proof to back up some of the claims made.

It just like when they show documentaries about the social structure of dinosaurs...i mean please.... how the fuck do they know ?

[jOdieeeiLy]

@Amorphustruth I completely agree,

[shivrajvishnu]

Moon has Water, ISRO confirmed this. NASA was hiding this fact from public for decades.

[buster27]

"you might be able to argue this if the moon wasn't up in the sky"

she said,

hahaha of course you wouldn't be filming it they where talking to you about the moon,hahaha...

thats a horrible example,but

yeah we probably wouldn't be here without the moon,

life or no life the world wouldn't be the world as we know it at all,different creatures mammals might not have what it takes.

[TallBrooklynGuy]

i dont see an explanation that 4 billion years ago it took only 4 hours for the earth to make a complete rotation?

thats not fair to the viewers. they should provide explanations when an extraordinary claim like this is made.

[buster27]

it's not extraordinary,

extreme things happen in space it's not un-common,

there is a planets spinning differently sitting at different angles,

slowing speeding up,

but all and all this isn't about the earth

it's about the moon

if you want to know about the history of earth,

it is available on this website your on.

[TallBrooklynGuy]

ummm...to make a claim that the earth rotated within 4 hours 4 billion years ago is a very extraordinary claim to make. of course extreme things happen. but extreme or not when you make a claim you need proof. do you have any idea how long 4 billion years is? i mean why not 3 or 2 billion years? where the proof. you cant just use so such a huge time frame lightly. it needs to be backed up by something. remember science is an objective way of going about things, not a subjective.

[buster27]

Again,the numbers support this, 3 to 2 billion? that would be a big mis-calculation, of course when you are working with this big of a time frame you can't possibly take everything in consideration, but you can take what you know it consideration, this is just made to give you an idea an idea the or anther piece to the puzzle, have you even looked for information about the earths rotation yet,probably not, because you don't want to find out your wrong Not a good science program in Brooklyn eh?

[TallBrooklynGuy]

"Again,the numbers support this,

3 to 2 billion?"

errrrr,,no! they dont what supports it?

[TallBrooklynGuy]

"have you even looked for information

about the earths rotation yet,probably not,

because you don't want to find out your wrong"

Ummmm actually did and once again i dont see any evidence and you dont have any either but challenge me to look where there is no where to look. since you support this, then provide evidence sir, dont challenge me to find it.

[TallBrooklynGuy]

you cant take everything into consideration?

oh boy.....thats my point....if you are using such a time frame you need evidence or else consider it an expression not scientific theory...i'm getting nowhere here.

[buster27]

Did you not go to school or something, did they not teach you how to research, i don't know how given schooling is research, I am a student who works all the time why should i have to sit down with you, it's pointless if i do the work for you, we know how things react by watching what we can see in nature and the universe i suggest you stop doing your in the library not youtube maybe that will keep you occupied from posting about 5 comments on one video within a minute.

[TallBrooklynGuy]

"Not a good science program in Brooklyn eh? "

ummm no it isnt since there is no evidence to support these outrageous time frames buster27 eh?

[buster27]

if you actually want me to sit and

do the math with you,

you have to be crazy though,

but there are books that will walk you right through it

and i wouldn't be a problem for me to get back at you

with a title if you would like.

[TallBrooklynGuy]

haha. you are the one that is crazy. there is no math do to.

what books?? astronomers throw "billions of years" around without any proof at all its only from observation they dont have a clue as how old it is.

i dont want a book about what will say the same thing as this film. i want proof of the timeline. we know how old trees are from tree ring dating. we know about rocks and fossils form carbon 14 dating. we DONT know about celestial objects. if you dont know anything. DONT TALK!

[buster27]

I am crazy huh?

your lost.

[TallBrooklynGuy]

yes you are if you believe this bunk.

science programs arent facts. you have to read textbooks. i have. many questions much of what has been said in this program.

[Loonypics]

This video maker has just contradicted him self, watch his other video !

[dannyhill1971lives]

The media fills our head with all this shit dis-information. How the fucking hell would they know what happened billions of years ago. Maybe an educated guess? Alot of educated guesses leave no room for the truth now does it?

[faustje34]

you are too stupid to undertand this information.

[dragunblade]

it call study of science slowy danny

[defuze0001]

fuck u

[aol1979]

this is not "dis-information". Especially not the way you're categorizing it. If history were to be recorded back then then there would be no need for this "dis-information". These theories are as close as we can get to fact without actually being there. Like on a significantly smaller scale when an investigator pieces together a mystery simply by the clues at the scene without ever being there for the incident.

[buster27]

umm take the numbers over a period of time you know and add them up, math exist in nature, science and math come together only using what nature and it's facts and measure based on facts they know, thats kid stuff... if you wan't some real dis-information look at yourself, the common man(un-educated)provides most of the dis-information for himself and others and doesn't try and go and figure it out for ones selve, culture is your ruler. peace

[ChawkyPower]

lol omg thats so ignorant hahahahahahaha

[superfisto]

Yay moon!