look i know im going to be critized by some losers who just like to talk shit but i dont fucking care!!..THis guy may not have recieved the GM Rank but he was fucking bad ass...Not just anyone draws with garry kasparov..Josh waitzkin did!!..and he was a fucking kid
Josh communicates so well and seems like such a nice, sincere guy. I really enjoyed his chess lectures on the Chessmaster pc games. What Josh calls the "art of learning" I would call metatheory of learning and its a topic few people discuss. Rather, I think we're fixated on the mythos of "natural talent." But really, one can become good at anything if one sets one's mind to it. What a great message for a book! I'll have to check it out. Good luck to Josh in his next challenge.
'The lady' said 8 years - not 10. And she was talking about 'dominating the chess world' in terms of prominence and publicity - not winning games from Grandmasters.
And when you achieve International status in chess by the age of 12, get back to us.
Hey listen asshole, during the period of 1990's GM Garry Kasparov dominated the chess world. Josh played in a simul with Garry and drew the game. But Jose was not good enough to face Garry in a tournament game. And yes the lady said 10 (ten) years.
No one here gets the premise of the book. Static identity does not exist. It's not about what you are good at, it's about learning, becoming good at something. This book should be every college students bible.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Anyone who buys this guy's book is a retard. He is still living off his chess past royalties (financially and otherwise), he's done one other discipline, and now he thinks he has figured out the secret to learning. If you are so great that you can write a book on learning, then why did you stop at only mastering two. How come he can't relearn the joy from chess that he had before either?to have also? LOL.
In fact after winning some 8 chess championships and 2 tai chi push hands world championships, he has moved on to a 3rd discipline, Jujutsu and aims to participate in competions in 2010/2011 I think. So, I think his learning strategies do actually work.
I Am A Grandmaster Aget 18 My Name Is Magnus Carlsen And Im From Norway I Think Josh Waitzkin Should Have Continued With His Chess Career He Had To Pay For Expensive Chess Lessons And He Didnt Even Become A Grandmaster I Had To Work Hard To Get My FIDE Rating Which Is: 2786
It's funny that they show him practicing brazilian jiu-jitsu while they talk about his Tai Chi successes :) (He also trains in bjj which is far more dynamic, not to mention way more practical than Tai Chi. But that's another story).
he failed his GM norms as far as i know. got money shoved up his ass to train with the best, and just stopped playing some time. he then got more money shoved up his arse to train with the best BJJ trainer.
He "lost the love"... more like he "lost too many games" and couldn't cut it in the big leagues. Most chess players rated above 2000 now that Waitzkin is no prodigy...He was a strong kid, but he's just a lower-than-average IM who could never become a GM (is he even an IM?).
He never said he is a prodigy. All that happened to him was that He didn't want to sacrifice his entire live for chess. I guess that when he was a kid it was fun for him to beat other kids just using his natural inteligence and talent (plus training, of course), but beating more advanced players would require hours and hours of training and studying, and he just didn't want that.
@extrememetal777 Thats very romantic, but there is no such thing as a genius who has success without study. Waitzkin too memorized moves and patterns, and there is no GM without natural talent.
he doesn't consider himself a prodidy because he worked hard? that's crap. A lot of people work as hard as he does, and after a long period of time they don't do nearly as well as he did on his first attempt.
Precisely the point! Professional chess needs a lot of devotion. I don't think any real American has ever devoted his life to chess, except for Fischer. There is sth in American culture that contradicts life-long devotion. Kamsky is a Tartar from Siberia and won twice the soviet U-20 champion before he moved to NY at 16. Btw Kamsky has a JD and is a licensed lawyer, so he can have a life outside chess if he wants to.
hes not the single one international master out there
i understand that that was his decision, but to leave chess implies either youre not loving chess anymore or you acknoledge IM is your peak and you cant go for GM title ( at least).
strange, i was convinced GM in chess is easier to obtain these days. anyway GM nowadays are much more frequest than in Bobby Fischer's time
Waitzkin was either very close or already at GM level. Had he continued in chess, it's a matter of time before he gets a GM title. However, there are about 1000 GMs and 2500 IMs out there. That's why we have the term superGM nowadays. Well, I don't think Waitzkin was ever to come close to a superGM.
@braileanul Only because the world is more connected and oppurtunities to expand your potential are around for almost anyone.
Leaving chess doesn't imply anything. Imposing your thought process to determine the reasons for someone elses decision implies a hell of alot more about you than him leaving chess implies about him.
Waitzkin was never to become one of them. Instead, with a writer father, who works for New York Times, it is much easier to make a decent living as a popular icon. He knows this better than anyone. From worldly perspective, He has every reason (and probably every right) to pursue the path he's taken.
Waitzkin is nowhere near world's top. He is not even comparable to his contemporary countryman Kamsky, needless to say, Fischer. In the world of chess, there are only a very limited group of professionals who can really make a decent living out of chess.
Chess and Tai Chi are not very different. In study, they are both ways of understanding combat, and in competition they are both forms of combat. I've yet to meet a martial arts master who isn't good at chess. Obviously, being "good at chess" and being an IM are worlds apart.
Josh Waitzkin is a brillian human being and an inspirational thinker. I only hope he rediscovers his love of chess, for his own sake. I imagine losing my love of writing. I'd rather lose my life.
Hmmm I can tell that this guy is a joke. No offense; Marcelo I respect though greatly.
airharm 2 months ago
he isnt gm because is too hard for him , and i have to say that is very bad to bobby fischer have his name associated with this men
tavinhocandeias 5 months ago
look i know im going to be critized by some losers who just like to talk shit but i dont fucking care!!..THis guy may not have recieved the GM Rank but he was fucking bad ass...Not just anyone draws with garry kasparov..Josh waitzkin did!!..and he was a fucking kid
fear0fthedark2000 7 months ago 2
His most important attribute is his personal character.
JeffersonDinedAlone 7 months ago 3
Good Job Josh...keep moving...
">"
TaiChiTex 1 year ago
Josh communicates so well and seems like such a nice, sincere guy. I really enjoyed his chess lectures on the Chessmaster pc games. What Josh calls the "art of learning" I would call metatheory of learning and its a topic few people discuss. Rather, I think we're fixated on the mythos of "natural talent." But really, one can become good at anything if one sets one's mind to it. What a great message for a book! I'll have to check it out. Good luck to Josh in his next challenge.
WhiteAbenaki 1 year ago
tai chi is so not a fighting system....
gqmighty 1 year ago
@gqmighty no but him being a brown belt under Marcelo Garcia in BJJ is.
JiuClaw22 1 year ago
@gqmighty much deeper than that boss
ohyeah2034 9 months ago in playlist INTERVIEW JOSH WAITZKIN
@gqmighty uhh... yes it is...
b0ondockz 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He did not dominated the chess world for 10 years. He is not even a grandmaster. The lady got it wrong.
ani19bd 2 years ago
So did you, dear.
'The lady' said 8 years - not 10. And she was talking about 'dominating the chess world' in terms of prominence and publicity - not winning games from Grandmasters.
And when you achieve International status in chess by the age of 12, get back to us.
GayIthacan 2 years ago
Hey listen asshole, during the period of 1990's GM Garry Kasparov dominated the chess world. Josh played in a simul with Garry and drew the game. But Jose was not good enough to face Garry in a tournament game. And yes the lady said 10 (ten) years.
Have a nice day major league assholel.
ani19bd 2 years ago
if you can find something in the book of value, great, if you cant, you have only lost 3 hours of your life, same as a good nap.
meekrn 2 years ago
If you can't find something in the book of value then you aren't self aware enough.
This book is chock full of deep self awareness in the part of the author. There are profound truths in this book.
Anyone interested in introspective performance psychology should get this now. The psychology is rock solid.
veridia 2 years ago
Comment removed
NUMBERSRUNNER71 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fantastic book. Very practical and honest book. Those who are critical of it should actually read it!
Everincon 3 years ago
Read the book, don't recommend it.
jp1989at 3 years ago
i found his book interesting and insightful.. just another opinion
seansurfgood 3 years ago
..from an idiot who can't accomplish anything, rofl.
axlfleming 3 years ago
good one. apparently my comment struck a nerve, i apologise for this, surely you must be good at something. :P
seansurfgood 3 years ago
No nerve struck, since you as you have noted, everyone must be good at something.
Maybe I am good at posting stupid comments and replies on youtube!
peace.
axlfleming 3 years ago
No one here gets the premise of the book. Static identity does not exist. It's not about what you are good at, it's about learning, becoming good at something. This book should be every college students bible.
veridia 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Anyone who buys this guy's book is a retard. He is still living off his chess past royalties (financially and otherwise), he's done one other discipline, and now he thinks he has figured out the secret to learning. If you are so great that you can write a book on learning, then why did you stop at only mastering two. How come he can't relearn the joy from chess that he had before either?to have also? LOL.
axlfleming 3 years ago
lol your obviously good at nothing
seansurfgood 3 years ago
In fact after winning some 8 chess championships and 2 tai chi push hands world championships, he has moved on to a 3rd discipline, Jujutsu and aims to participate in competions in 2010/2011 I think. So, I think his learning strategies do actually work.
violinmusicfan 2 years ago
I got the book last thursday, been reading it since, today is tuesday, and I'm loving the book.
WiTeBoi 3 years ago
I Am A Grandmaster Aget 18 My Name Is Magnus Carlsen And Im From Norway I Think Josh Waitzkin Should Have Continued With His Chess Career He Had To Pay For Expensive Chess Lessons And He Didnt Even Become A Grandmaster I Had To Work Hard To Get My FIDE Rating Which Is: 2786
30g4nmi 3 years ago
It's funny that they show him practicing brazilian jiu-jitsu while they talk about his Tai Chi successes :) (He also trains in bjj which is far more dynamic, not to mention way more practical than Tai Chi. But that's another story).
vibovitold 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wanna have sex LOlz. msg me online on M.S.N.
i was naked while I watched this video! AI
MsIero 3 years ago
what is IM or GM?
sieuquach 3 years ago
International Master and Granmaster
thechules 3 years ago
he failed his GM norms as far as i know. got money shoved up his ass to train with the best, and just stopped playing some time. he then got more money shoved up his arse to train with the best BJJ trainer.
levlobotomy 3 years ago
He "lost the love"... more like he "lost too many games" and couldn't cut it in the big leagues. Most chess players rated above 2000 now that Waitzkin is no prodigy...He was a strong kid, but he's just a lower-than-average IM who could never become a GM (is he even an IM?).
Wikimedian 3 years ago
He never said he is a prodigy. All that happened to him was that He didn't want to sacrifice his entire live for chess. I guess that when he was a kid it was fun for him to beat other kids just using his natural inteligence and talent (plus training, of course), but beating more advanced players would require hours and hours of training and studying, and he just didn't want that.
thechules 3 years ago
Hey, neither of you know the guy, so stop portraying your opinions as fact. He has a great deal of something you both will never have: character.
pkysr2 3 years ago
oh rly ? i disagree.
levlobotomy 3 years ago
either way josh has helped my game heaps, its nice to see someonelse who looks at chess as more of a musical thing then just math
jandlefob 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oi stupid josh isnt an IM hes a GM, hes an awsome dude good on you josh
jandlefob 3 years ago
actually Josh is an IM
sleepyeyeguy 3 years ago
damn thats him he looks different
nibols23 3 years ago
The Waitzkin's are just great at marketing, sure Josh is a good player but there are 1000s of IMs.
ChessChat 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Josh is a natural talent.
he is not like many other grandmasters who just mug up or remember all the moves,pattern and play to win or draw.
he is genuine.
extrememetal777 4 years ago
@extrememetal777 well..he was never even a grandmaster..so.....
gqmighty 1 year ago 3
@extrememetal777 Thats very romantic, but there is no such thing as a genius who has success without study. Waitzkin too memorized moves and patterns, and there is no GM without natural talent.
scsteeldrums 1 year ago
he doesn't consider himself a prodidy because he worked hard? that's crap. A lot of people work as hard as he does, and after a long period of time they don't do nearly as well as he did on his first attempt.
jplolo316 4 years ago
no he doesn't like to call himself a prodigy and its not because he worked hard.
termanogue 3 years ago
Precisely the point! Professional chess needs a lot of devotion. I don't think any real American has ever devoted his life to chess, except for Fischer. There is sth in American culture that contradicts life-long devotion. Kamsky is a Tartar from Siberia and won twice the soviet U-20 champion before he moved to NY at 16. Btw Kamsky has a JD and is a licensed lawyer, so he can have a life outside chess if he wants to.
lisonghao1983 4 years ago
hes not the single one international master out there
i understand that that was his decision, but to leave chess implies either youre not loving chess anymore or you acknoledge IM is your peak and you cant go for GM title ( at least).
strange, i was convinced GM in chess is easier to obtain these days. anyway GM nowadays are much more frequest than in Bobby Fischer's time
braileanul 4 years ago 2
Waitzkin was either very close or already at GM level. Had he continued in chess, it's a matter of time before he gets a GM title. However, there are about 1000 GMs and 2500 IMs out there. That's why we have the term superGM nowadays. Well, I don't think Waitzkin was ever to come close to a superGM.
lisonghao1983 4 years ago
@braileanul Only because the world is more connected and oppurtunities to expand your potential are around for almost anyone.
Leaving chess doesn't imply anything. Imposing your thought process to determine the reasons for someone elses decision implies a hell of alot more about you than him leaving chess implies about him.
theuppro 8 months ago
Waitzkin was never to become one of them. Instead, with a writer father, who works for New York Times, it is much easier to make a decent living as a popular icon. He knows this better than anyone. From worldly perspective, He has every reason (and probably every right) to pursue the path he's taken.
lisonghao1983 4 years ago 2
interesting comments those of yours.
and intelligent choice that of Joshs. to be expected from a chess/martial arts guy....
ranssff 4 years ago
Waitzkin is nowhere near world's top. He is not even comparable to his contemporary countryman Kamsky, needless to say, Fischer. In the world of chess, there are only a very limited group of professionals who can really make a decent living out of chess.
lisonghao1983 4 years ago
Chess and Tai Chi are not very different. In study, they are both ways of understanding combat, and in competition they are both forms of combat. I've yet to meet a martial arts master who isn't good at chess. Obviously, being "good at chess" and being an IM are worlds apart.
Josh Waitzkin is a brillian human being and an inspirational thinker. I only hope he rediscovers his love of chess, for his own sake. I imagine losing my love of writing. I'd rather lose my life.
capnconundrum 4 years ago
your comment helps to understand Josh's prespective. thank you.
ranssff 4 years ago
josh what happend to your hair?
mykoniato 4 years ago