After using your video's for so long Patrick i now watch these immediately after the lectures instead of waiting for the night before the exam. I have to say it has made this semester a lot more smooth than usual!
You're in pre calc... What kinds of systems are you solving? 2, 3, MAYBE 4 equations? Try using substitution and elimination on a big ol' 6x7 system without Gaussian elimination and tell me your way is faster and with less margin for error.
Thanks for the video. I couldnt figure out how to solve using this method but after watching your video I figured it out. just in time for my final exam tomorrow. Thanks!
I have stopped listening to my calc professor and began relying on your videos. I don't know if that is a good or bad thing. I am, however, getting A's on my quizzes since I began to listen to you, so I'll take it as a good sign haha.
This is the most inefficient way to solve a system of equations. It takes way too much time and there is huge room for error. Isn't mathematics about solving the problem the quickest and easiest way?
@bikeous23 i am not sure how to respond. you just seem a bit angry about it all. this is a wonderful way to solve large systems of equations. what method do you have that is more efficient?
and what does: there is huge room for error? there is no room for error if one can do arithmetic correctly. yes, there are lots of computations, but we are not adding 2 + 2 here...
and no, math is not as trivial as you seem to make it.
@patrickJMT i think he means for solving the system of equations where u cud just multiply by two and subract the equation 1 from another ..stuff gets cancled out and u can solve it...
he is missing the point of the video which is learning row reduction. so his comment is just stupid.
@bikeous23 Patrick has done it in the simplest way possible, at least by what I have watched. Have you taken Linear algebra or are you just spouting nonsense?
@Newdiabetic I'm in Pre-calculus, its easy to understand how he does it but its too time consuming. Too much room for error that's all. It can be seen as comparing two computer programs that do the same thing but are written differently. The better program would be the faster one, get what I'm saying?
@bikeous23 Surely there are much simpler ways to solves systems in 2 or 3 uknowns. But the method introduced in the video can be applied to any system in x number of unknowns, which is the real stregth of the method.
@bikeous23 If you're lazy you can use software like mathematica or maple.... that shortens it down to one command like gausselim, or gaussjordan or something similar, but you still have to define the system.
@bikeous23 I have to disagree, whilst solving systems of equations involving many variables this is the best way. You will find that using this method with Partial fraction decomposition, when you can get 10 or more variables for very complex equations, matrices are undoubtedly the easiest and most efficient way, especially considering all it takes is very basic arithmetic.
@bikeous23 for a few equations with few variables the time it takes isn't quite efficient, but the power of this method is more obvious when you're dealing with MANY equations and/or MANY variables, which are more likely to occur in real-world applications
I can see how people would be very confused, you shorten your steps rather than showing your work. For example at 6:50 your doing 2 steps at one but not showing anyone what your really doing (I got lost a few times). This video helped clarify some things that I had trouble understanding thank you for posting this video
@SpaceBandit666 if i wrote out every single arithmetic step, this video would take about 10 years to make. you need to be able to fill in some stuff as you go. there is a pause button. try to fill in the steps yourself and you will actually start learning.
@rolle16. I'm not Patrick, but I am a math teacher. The values he chose do not have to be those exact numbers. The goal is to convert the coefficients of the matching variables such that when you add them, their sum is zero and they can be eliminated. Example: 4a + 5b = 12 -7a + 2b = 18. Multiply first row by 7 and second row by 4, then add. The a variable drops off in each row, allowing you to solve for b.
sir, this is an excellent vid but may i ask you a question? what i dont understand is for example at 8:32 you say that you take -2R2+ R1 and 5R2 + R3. how do you know that you have to chose that? Is there a way how you can see this? (sorry for my bad english)
@rolle16 which rows you choose to multiply by and add to other rows is entirely up to you. there is no one "right" way to reduce a matrix. some paths may be faster than others, but sometimes even that is impossible to tell in advance. IOW use your good judgement and then don't sweat it after that
You are honestly amazing. I have been trying to figure this out by myself for FOREVER, and I watch this once- AND COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND IT. You are brilliant.
Just want to say thanks alot for posting this I didnt understand it but now I do =D hopefully I get a good grade on my test but I can see you a gifted at math thanks again =D
Thanks so much for these videos! I pay thousands of dollars for college math courses and just get confused by the teachers, then i watch your videos and it all makes sense! keep up the good work this helps a lot!!
matrices is still really difficult for me , especcialy the 3 by 3! I understand when you explain it but on the exam....... wow noot alll all. all this switching and adding and changing... i get really lost
@fairygool matrices can be pretty confusing - there is just so much arithmetic and book keeping to do. all we can do is keep practicing! it will come to you!
You saved my ass at least a dozen times in highschool, and now here I am a junior in college and you bail me out again. You are a freakin math god sir
The only way u will understand it is if u constantly pause and rewind it, I know that's what's helping me! But at least unlike ur prof. u can pause him and repeat him! Good Luck!
WOW, thank you, my book does not show how to do the matix method i thank you that you posted this up, i was a bit confused but your example is really clear and organized. THANKS
at 7:31 when you mention you want to make the entry in the middle a one, why didnt you just divide the line by -5? so you can end up with a 1 in the middle instead of switching rows.
His examples might be in 9th grade algebra but the method applies to much more complicated systems of equations. Plus getting used to solving them in matrices is nice because once you get the idea behind how it's done then you can learn how to find the inverse matrix(of the left side) on a calculator and multiply by the right side to get the answers of very complex systems in a matter of seconds.
hahaha i have a chineese algebra teacher and its really hard to understand what he says, and his jokes he tells in class are so weird and random... i tried to change out of his class but... they didnt let me... lol
Lol i'm part of the 'chinese teacher' club too... any chance you guys go to UVU? lol and thanks for the vid, btw, i didn't know there was a test until today, and i didn't study, and my book is on the other side of the lake, in a locked school... Today is one of those days where you wake up and say "SHIT!"
Yes. This method is called Gauss-Jordan elimination and it's a specific kind of gaussian elimination... it's much longer, but you get the result directly...
Oh my gosh, thank you so much for this video! Last year in my Algebra class I learned systems of linear equations, and I need to do an Algebra review of that this year in Geometry. I really needed that help, thanks again!
You make it look so easy but I know on my own I have the hardest time coming up with how to deal with the rows. Cramer's rule is so much easier but my professor doesn't want us to only rely on Cramer. :-(
matricies are powerful, this simple system of line comparisons can be abstracted to special cases of almost anything that you can think of. Primrarily spacial freedoms.
@Penfish2k LOL except that I usually use a calculator to reduce matrices and have done PLENTY of advanced math. I just have to relearn it now to take the MFT and graduate with a math degree loll
you're calling -28 a big number?it's not that big , trust me, I've worked with bigger. Great technique btw,I'll use it from now on. I learned it a bit differently in high school I wonder if my college teacher will approve of this technique( I wonder if they even know about it)
my wife is a teacher, and it seems that she was also taking about matrices one day in class... and was discussing the size of a matrix when she said: 'listen guys, i hate to break it to you, but size matters. it really, really does. bigger is harder usually.' or something like that!
she was quoted in the school paper or somewhere for it...
I just got my linear algebra textbook today for my math course this quarter and I was horrified to see it's full of matrices. I haven't seen those things since high school... thanks for the refresher!
matrices are great! the basic ideas that matrices deal with are core ideas that get used in higher math! they are super super useful and good to understand!!
Looks amazing. I have not clue on how to do it myself but I imagine if I knew all the rules in solving them and a brain the size of texas, I could do it :)
Hey! at 1:35, i said there is no solution if there is a number on the left side, but no number on the right! That is wrong! I should have said: there is no solution if there is no number on the left of the bar, but there is a number in that row on the right side. For examples, that would mean 0x + 0y + 0z =10 which has no solution! SOrry for the confusion... I just woke up and did not have my coffee yet!! : )
how do you do homogenous linear equations?
PUNKFUSION1992 5 days ago
After using your video's for so long Patrick i now watch these immediately after the lectures instead of waiting for the night before the exam. I have to say it has made this semester a lot more smooth than usual!
Thank you!!!!!!
aerialaces21 1 week ago
@aerialaces21 yes, i found out the same thing! reading a section before we went over it in class helped me tons
patrickJMT 6 days ago
Good day! Is it necessary to change the rows? At our school, we weren't introduced to that technique.
BallpenEater 1 week ago
@bikeous23
You're in pre calc... What kinds of systems are you solving? 2, 3, MAYBE 4 equations? Try using substitution and elimination on a big ol' 6x7 system without Gaussian elimination and tell me your way is faster and with less margin for error.
6BURG9 1 week ago
Ugh is it just me or is Calculus actually more fun than LA? Getting the hang of it though thanks Patrick!
6BURG9 1 week ago
tnx.. i learn a lot more power man..
1218el 1 week ago
if you don't mind answering, where did you learn maths patrick?
impotentarab 2 weeks ago
@impotentarab school, books, my own. the normal places i think.
patrickJMT 2 weeks ago
Thanks for the video. I couldnt figure out how to solve using this method but after watching your video I figured it out. just in time for my final exam tomorrow. Thanks!
jaker0135 1 month ago
@jaker0135 good luck on the final :)
patrickJMT 1 month ago
what if you don't get 1 for the second number on the second row? what would you do?
elleen54 2 months ago in playlist More videos from patrickJMT
@elleen54 you have to make it a one or else the end results are correct
carolina27941 3 weeks ago
thank you so much for this!!
meers93 2 months ago
omg....this is beautiful. He explains it so perfectly. gotta love PAT!
Killuminatismd 2 months ago
omg yes thanks!
purepinoii 3 months ago
I LOVE U !!!!
TheLoveformankind 3 months ago
I have stopped listening to my calc professor and began relying on your videos. I don't know if that is a good or bad thing. I am, however, getting A's on my quizzes since I began to listen to you, so I'll take it as a good sign haha.
yukun92 3 months ago
@yukun92 ha, watch videos AND pay attention in class : )
patrickJMT 3 months ago 6
guh... I liked calculus better. Never thought I'd say this!
Thank you :)
lolkiwi 4 months ago
Thanks very helpful!
ramroomi1 4 months ago
It was good, thx! (:
baturinj 4 months ago
Although this technique is great, it's really slow compared to calculator. xD
YamiThunderous 4 months ago
@YamiThunderous an abacus is even faster
patrickJMT 4 months ago 2
I've never seen this done before. What a great system! I don't know if my teacher would like me learn it though :)
Basram 4 months ago
@Basram i think your teacher would be fine with you learning. ; )
patrickJMT 4 months ago
Comment removed
invisiblebutterfly6 5 months ago
PatrickJMT, your videos are useful for learning the basic, I face all kinds of complicated exercices in my book.
UnleashedFire 5 months ago
@UnleashedFire go forth and apply
patrickJMT 4 months ago 2
thank u ! i was struggling with this !
Light3282 7 months ago
but what if oyu don't have a one in one of these equations?
mierty21 7 months ago
Perfect explanation mate. Thank you so much. This cleared up my lecturer's messy notes! Great video. Helped out a lot.
tetrawavern 8 months ago
Next Lesson...Encouraging Suicide before we start with linear systems
Ombaeh 8 months ago
Kahn Academy doesn't have sh*t on this! Keep up the good work!
KavishTanna 8 months ago
Thanx Pat, you bypass all the shit and keep the important things clear! You've really helped me out! keep em' coming!!
SuperPowderkeg 9 months ago
omg patrick, i need you for eigenvectors LOL
iamtheasianjamesbond 9 months ago
how to know what equation to use because i always use the wrong one
cuilboy001 10 months ago
This is the most inefficient way to solve a system of equations. It takes way too much time and there is huge room for error. Isn't mathematics about solving the problem the quickest and easiest way?
bikeous23 10 months ago
@bikeous23 i am not sure how to respond. you just seem a bit angry about it all. this is a wonderful way to solve large systems of equations. what method do you have that is more efficient?
and what does: there is huge room for error? there is no room for error if one can do arithmetic correctly. yes, there are lots of computations, but we are not adding 2 + 2 here...
and no, math is not as trivial as you seem to make it.
patrickJMT 10 months ago 10
@patrickJMT cool..in your face bike
kakikukimakko 9 months ago
@patrickJMT cool..in your face bike
kakikukimakko 9 months ago
@patrickJMT i think he means for solving the system of equations where u cud just multiply by two and subract the equation 1 from another ..stuff gets cancled out and u can solve it...
he is missing the point of the video which is learning row reduction. so his comment is just stupid.
Abhishhehehe 5 months ago
@bikeous23 Patrick has done it in the simplest way possible, at least by what I have watched. Have you taken Linear algebra or are you just spouting nonsense?
Newdiabetic 9 months ago 2
@Newdiabetic nonsense is the norm of the internet (and of the world in general)
patrickJMT 9 months ago 5
@Newdiabetic I'm in Pre-calculus, its easy to understand how he does it but its too time consuming. Too much room for error that's all. It can be seen as comparing two computer programs that do the same thing but are written differently. The better program would be the faster one, get what I'm saying?
bikeous23 9 months ago
@bikeous23 Surely there are much simpler ways to solves systems in 2 or 3 uknowns. But the method introduced in the video can be applied to any system in x number of unknowns, which is the real stregth of the method.
kaflavik101 9 months ago
@bikeous23 If you're lazy you can use software like mathematica or maple.... that shortens it down to one command like gausselim, or gaussjordan or something similar, but you still have to define the system.
Thanx from Norway for the vids.
Palmgren86 7 months ago
@bikeous23 I have to disagree, whilst solving systems of equations involving many variables this is the best way. You will find that using this method with Partial fraction decomposition, when you can get 10 or more variables for very complex equations, matrices are undoubtedly the easiest and most efficient way, especially considering all it takes is very basic arithmetic.
jazzysax102391 6 months ago
@bikeous23 for a few equations with few variables the time it takes isn't quite efficient, but the power of this method is more obvious when you're dealing with MANY equations and/or MANY variables, which are more likely to occur in real-world applications
finnvoid 5 months ago
Hey man, thanks for everything. I got to the university of waterloo.
I can certainly say that you are better than everysingle math teached I have ever had.
josepm00 11 months ago
I can see how people would be very confused, you shorten your steps rather than showing your work. For example at 6:50 your doing 2 steps at one but not showing anyone what your really doing (I got lost a few times). This video helped clarify some things that I had trouble understanding thank you for posting this video
SpaceBandit666 11 months ago
@SpaceBandit666 if i wrote out every single arithmetic step, this video would take about 10 years to make. you need to be able to fill in some stuff as you go. there is a pause button. try to fill in the steps yourself and you will actually start learning.
patrickJMT 11 months ago 9
@rolle16. Please note the formatting problems in my note. The formatting should be:
4a + 5b = 12
-7a + 2b = 18
her008605 1 year ago
@rolle16. I'm not Patrick, but I am a math teacher. The values he chose do not have to be those exact numbers. The goal is to convert the coefficients of the matching variables such that when you add them, their sum is zero and they can be eliminated. Example: 4a + 5b = 12 -7a + 2b = 18. Multiply first row by 7 and second row by 4, then add. The a variable drops off in each row, allowing you to solve for b.
her008605 1 year ago
sir, this is an excellent vid but may i ask you a question? what i dont understand is for example at 8:32 you say that you take -2R2+ R1 and 5R2 + R3. how do you know that you have to chose that? Is there a way how you can see this? (sorry for my bad english)
rolle16 1 year ago
@rolle16 which rows you choose to multiply by and add to other rows is entirely up to you. there is no one "right" way to reduce a matrix. some paths may be faster than others, but sometimes even that is impossible to tell in advance. IOW use your good judgement and then don't sweat it after that
emeraldmorn 10 months ago
Is this the Gauss-Jordan Elimination?
gerardaddict 1 year ago
by substition of course
TheTalmon18 1 year ago
Patrick, the problems i get, i get the zeros first
then when i try getting a 1, i get the 1 but then the 0's turn to different numbers
I dont know how to make that a 1 while keeping the first 0
so i just get all 0's and one number in 1 row, then solve the others>.>
TheTalmon18 1 year ago
can you do more examples of this
Daltex951 1 year ago
@Daltex951 there should be quite a few of these if you search for them on my channel page
patrickJMT 1 year ago
WOW you have no idea how much this helped on my finals yesterday THANKS ALOT!!!!
XxiPodxX1 1 year ago
thanks
Mike01010011 1 year ago
You are honestly amazing. I have been trying to figure this out by myself for FOREVER, and I watch this once- AND COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND IT. You are brilliant.
carpevlog 1 year ago
THANKYOU!!!!!!!!!
Bluelincolnpark 1 year ago
Just want to say thanks alot for posting this I didnt understand it but now I do =D hopefully I get a good grade on my test but I can see you a gifted at math thanks again =D
dagosto11211 1 year ago
do we have to switch the rows? or can be just solve it the way it is??
xxxcartooonxgurlxxx 1 year ago
ok i got every part except the part how i stop a bullet or doge them??????????
cod4lover123321123 1 year ago
Thanks so much for these videos! I pay thousands of dollars for college math courses and just get confused by the teachers, then i watch your videos and it all makes sense! keep up the good work this helps a lot!!
hckynck20 1 year ago
i think you could plug numbers in x and y to find the answers right
joeldsouza2 1 year ago
You explain things in an excellent way! thanks to you I finally got a hang of matrices´;)
So thanks alot Sir!
DenDhur 1 year ago
Comment removed
Thevick94 1 year ago
Comment removed
Thevick94 1 year ago
Its simple like 1+2
moveest 1 year ago
you are the best
qwertyfshag 1 year ago
how many emails do you get per day ???
Q8RedDevil91 1 year ago
matrices is still really difficult for me , especcialy the 3 by 3! I understand when you explain it but on the exam....... wow noot alll all. all this switching and adding and changing... i get really lost
fairygool 1 year ago
@fairygool matrices can be pretty confusing - there is just so much arithmetic and book keeping to do. all we can do is keep practicing! it will come to you!
patrickJMT 1 year ago 2
@patrickJMT i'll try... :D
fairygool 1 year ago
@fairygool
yea the same to me;(
i am afraite that i will not pass from math;(exam
1991hayla 1 year ago
@fairygool buy brains on ebay 99usd each!
TheFluxProductions 1 year ago
this is very amazing and i understand everthing here
GREAT JOB BTW!
randomlego55 1 year ago
I have just finished AP Calculus and gotten a 5 on the exam, and I have never learned this : (
jazzysax102391 1 year ago
Excuse me. You don't know anything about History of Maths. This is the Gauss-Jordan method
fcortinahernandez 1 year ago
this video is so great,i have my final exam tmr and now i understand this crazy calculation,thanks.
D3vilPri3st 1 year ago
Are you a wizard?
fateater77777 1 year ago
You saved my ass at least a dozen times in highschool, and now here I am a junior in college and you bail me out again. You are a freakin math god sir
pdg5333 1 year ago
@pdg5333 ha - that is awesome for me to hear.
if and when i make it to the pearly gates, at least they will not accuse me of being totally useless in this world.
patrickJMT 1 year ago 2
no no no, i was looking for upper triangular matrix video...looks like i came to the wrong place
TheBucksB 1 year ago
Thanks! My engineering professor decided to throw this and a bit more material at us yesterday. You made it easy. :)
kylemartin3 1 year ago
wow.. this stuff just takes too little credit... honestly man.. well done
ficovozicico 1 year ago
you're a life saver! Thank you
Inaneen 1 year ago 2
Dude u r a genius. Thanks buddy, u rule!!.
bianco0727 2 years ago 2
really nice video, thank you..
14s200 2 years ago 2
That 2 looked exactly like z, had me confused for about 5 minutes :P
karlkarlkarl1234 2 years ago
Comment removed
Beasal007 2 years ago
The only way u will understand it is if u constantly pause and rewind it, I know that's what's helping me! But at least unlike ur prof. u can pause him and repeat him! Good Luck!
yaamo 2 years ago 2
@ Beasal007
how old are you??
PLGodly 2 years ago
rewind play - rewind play - rewind play LOL
valeagrl1 2 years ago 26
WOW, thank you, my book does not show how to do the matix method i thank you that you posted this up, i was a bit confused but your example is really clear and organized. THANKS
theenigmaticone818 2 years ago
mr patrick ur a best teacher....i'm a student in india
jeevanrokz 2 years ago 2
at 7:31 when you mention you want to make the entry in the middle a one, why didnt you just divide the line by -5? so you can end up with a 1 in the middle instead of switching rows.
BigHunger 2 years ago
i think he was trying to avoid making the rest of the row into fractions
aafrophone 2 years ago
what if all of the x's are not equal to 1?
trassssss 2 years ago
Oh man, my brain just had a seizure. I'm only in 10th grade Geometry, I have no idea what this is!
EdikShepherd 2 years ago
Really? This is in 9th grade algebra :D
caterpie787 2 years ago 3
His examples might be in 9th grade algebra but the method applies to much more complicated systems of equations. Plus getting used to solving them in matrices is nice because once you get the idea behind how it's done then you can learn how to find the inverse matrix(of the left side) on a calculator and multiply by the right side to get the answers of very complex systems in a matter of seconds.
jwt3213 1 year ago
Dude, I have a chinese teacher and i was frreaken out cuz i didnt understand shit. Now it seems very simple. Thank a lot!
marekgola 2 years ago
hahaha i have a chineese algebra teacher and its really hard to understand what he says, and his jokes he tells in class are so weird and random... i tried to change out of his class but... they didnt let me... lol
javflo2204 2 years ago
Lol i'm part of the 'chinese teacher' club too... any chance you guys go to UVU? lol and thanks for the vid, btw, i didn't know there was a test until today, and i didn't study, and my book is on the other side of the lake, in a locked school... Today is one of those days where you wake up and say "SHIT!"
sqeeekboarder 2 years ago
thanks patrick this helped alot! =)
OTorehnai 2 years ago 4
is this somewhat similar to gaussian elimination??
30x60 2 years ago
Yes. This method is called Gauss-Jordan elimination and it's a specific kind of gaussian elimination... it's much longer, but you get the result directly...
cobreaper2 2 years ago
Yes, it is.
Thundermand 2 years ago
man this COMPLICATED !!!! who ever invented this is CRAZY ...!!
vampySARAH 2 years ago
yes, it is very tedious : )
it is 'elimination by addition' with only the coefficients in the matrix.
this stuff is super super useful though in many applications!!!
patrickJMT 2 years ago
Oh my gosh, thank you so much for this video! Last year in my Algebra class I learned systems of linear equations, and I need to do an Algebra review of that this year in Geometry. I really needed that help, thanks again!
tessabug101 2 years ago
can someone explain something to a laymen
at 03:55 you state, "negative four times by zero and add 1 that will just give me one" how does this make sense?
-4 x 0 = -4
-4 + 1 = -3
i take it im totally missing something here but i dont see what
jse07 2 years ago
Jse07,
-4 x 0 = 0 due to the multiplicative property of zero.
0 + 1 = 1
himynameisakshay 2 years ago
-4 x 0 = 0
ANY number times zero equals zero
ginasexy78 2 years ago
dude. -4 x 0 = ZERO thus, 0+1=1
AlessiChristimatrix 2 years ago
ya, no problem : )
go forth and spread the math gospel
patrickJMT 2 years ago
@patrickJMT
die die die die die
technolifevlc 1 year ago
scampern u do the same u would still multiply them remember the rules of adding negative
dragonxd1124 2 years ago
What do I do if I have a column matrix that should be equal a column matrix?
bo=(y1/8+y2/8+y3/8 too y/8)
b1=(same here, but y's have -+ signs)
b2=(same as above)
b3=(same as above)
The plusses and negatives on the y values are different in each, but add up to 4 negatives and 4 positives on each row of the column vector.
I dont expect you do solve it, but how do I start?
Scampern 2 years ago
Oh man.....Gaussian Elimination....try doing this as a fortran program with Gauss-Jordan Elimination and Gauss-Seidel.
o.O
actually, you're method is way more clear than the way I was taught. My lecturer made things so complicated.
RapidFireAlgorithm 2 years ago
nice, fortran!!!
patrickJMT 2 years ago
You make it look so easy but I know on my own I have the hardest time coming up with how to deal with the rows. Cramer's rule is so much easier but my professor doesn't want us to only rely on Cramer. :-(
alrightypewriter 2 years ago
matricies are powerful, this simple system of line comparisons can be abstracted to special cases of almost anything that you can think of. Primrarily spacial freedoms.
EdgeStormcrow 3 years ago
im doing university maths... no calculators for 3 years.. no calcs in tests or practice they say.
EdgeStormcrow 3 years ago
most advanced math doesnt require a calculator.
Penfish2k 3 years ago 21
@Penfish2k LOL except that I usually use a calculator to reduce matrices and have done PLENTY of advanced math. I just have to relearn it now to take the MFT and graduate with a math degree loll
emeraldmorn 10 months ago
you're calling -28 a big number?it's not that big , trust me, I've worked with bigger. Great technique btw,I'll use it from now on. I learned it a bit differently in high school I wonder if my college teacher will approve of this technique( I wonder if they even know about it)
sakuranohana89 3 years ago
haha priceless "i've worked with bigger"
j1nj0 3 years ago
lol!
my wife is a teacher, and it seems that she was also taking about matrices one day in class... and was discussing the size of a matrix when she said: 'listen guys, i hate to break it to you, but size matters. it really, really does. bigger is harder usually.' or something like that!
she was quoted in the school paper or somewhere for it...
priceless.
patrickJMT 3 years ago
LOL
x0randomness0x 3 years ago
lmao
its a really good tutorial, helped me alot.
thank you :)
khair6006 2 years ago
I love your technique! You saved my ass in calculus. Thank you so much!
SsSaNdRiNe 3 years ago
ha! glad it helps.
patrickJMT 3 years ago
you have opened my eyes! I finally understand!
sparrowax 3 years ago
OMG i was looking at matrix movies and ended up here, got to love utube.
Has this over algebra (algebra linear in portuguese)in the school days, miss the old times :D
RicardoR5 3 years ago
me too!
filipemtx 3 years ago
man this is way be on my knowledge!! Where do you use this for? Programming? Because I wanna get into programming so I might need it.
flashback1234 3 years ago
wow dud very nice, i learned it by the second problem u did, its amazing thx man now i know how to do linear equations =D
sasuke305QB 3 years ago
Excellent job explaining that... you rock man!
tziady 3 years ago
thnx man..u save my midterm
sukit 3 years ago
this can be done in a calculator
evanester 3 years ago
any monkey can be trained to push buttons
patrickJMT 3 years ago
so can any human...?
evanester 3 years ago
how?
Jaime44244 3 years ago
I just got my linear algebra textbook today for my math course this quarter and I was horrified to see it's full of matrices. I haven't seen those things since high school... thanks for the refresher!
colonelmatterson 3 years ago
matrices are great! the basic ideas that matrices deal with are core ideas that get used in higher math! they are super super useful and good to understand!!
patrickJMT 3 years ago
Thankyou so much ... u provided me with all the necessary help... thanks again
muskanSETHI 3 years ago
no problem!
patrickJMT 3 years ago
Looks amazing. I have not clue on how to do it myself but I imagine if I knew all the rules in solving them and a brain the size of texas, I could do it :)
cool stuff!
phantomx2003 3 years ago
very nice video :)has interested me :) lots cheerz 4 da post 5 stars and i have subscribed :D
timmytrip 3 years ago
your 2 looks like a z lol confused me
bbddbdbd 3 years ago
sorry! : )
patrickJMT 3 years ago
Good video, the only issue is that you always start with a 1 at the top left of the matrix, most of us are not so fortunate.
mastergsan 3 years ago
this video is finished in another part if you are interested
patrickJMT 3 years ago
neato
orangeblueandlavenda 3 years ago
Hey! at 1:35, i said there is no solution if there is a number on the left side, but no number on the right! That is wrong! I should have said: there is no solution if there is no number on the left of the bar, but there is a number in that row on the right side. For examples, that would mean 0x + 0y + 0z =10 which has no solution! SOrry for the confusion... I just woke up and did not have my coffee yet!! : )
patrickJMT 3 years ago