Scientists talking about bending space time to travel huge distances is a bit of a waste of time, I love quantum theory but AS FAR AS WE KNOW no-one has even produced useable antigravity or designed anything that will power this technology becase lets be honest it must need huge amounts of energy, space bending? we need to walk first! i dont know about the rest of youtube but im sick of being governed and amazing technologies behing held from us! Any ideas on how to change this? PM me...
If the universe was infinite, well theres an infinite amount of reasons why this is impossible. It means that there are an infinite amoubnt of everything in the universe. which means tHAT THERE WOULD BE INFINITE BIG BANGS IN THE UNIVERSE, INFINITE CRUNCHES, THERE WOULD BE NO UNIVERSE AND A UNIVERSE AT THE SAME TIME, PHYSICS WOULD AND WOULDN'T EXIST. SEVERAL PROBLEMS WITH THIS. I MIGHT HAVE TO MAKE A VIDEO ABOUT IT. BUT I HOPE YOU SOMEWHAT GET MY POINT.
Ok so I'm having discussions with Nate and reading up on shit, but whom do I see online but someone whom I party with in Winnipeg. I totally know you man, we must chat.
my theory is, we will have to look at nonlinear dynamics in order to figure all this out
I disagree w/ physicists like Kaku in that I don;t think that singularity (a theory of everything) is the way to 'figure out' the underlying principles of the universe... I think that the principles are infinite b/c the universe is infinite - we are simply finite BEINGS... :D
god i fucking hate people who dont just record a straight feed and cut and paste clips together every 5 seconds, also your hair is fuckin dummm reminds me of middle school
It is not true, that mass increases when speed increases. The term e = m c2 has been a helper for maths. Not for reality. It deals with comparison of rest mass. But also rest mass is a concept and not real. There is no rest mass in the universe, since everything travels around.
Why should the density increase when speed increases? And in relation to what? Fighter jets aren't fast. Looking for something fast? Whats about the earth traveling around the sun? Approx. 109000 km/h. Still slow to me.
actually, 130 isn't low. 100 is the average IQ. Yes, I've heard of Quantum Mechanics, and it's string theory that suggests 10 or 11 dimensions, or at least that's what the math gives us. and I highly doubt that someone with an IQ of 145 would speak like a 5 year old.
"Think of a 2 dimensional person, like an ant" ??? Last time i checked ants were 3 dimensional and not people. But take it as constructive criticism. Your video was very educational and kept me looking up quantum physic and string theory videos on youtube for hours. thanks
i hope you're not serious... we live IN a three dimensional world, and FEEL the effect of the fourth dimensional. Otherwise we would be able to imagine a 4th dimensiona hypercube, or reassemble a tessaract into the fourth dimension.
you're a 21yo **AMERICAN** (ie. IQ of 12) so go back to your swampland, jeb. everyone knows that if you envision a human being in four-dimensions, you'll see a trail of that person's body going this way and that in three spatial dimensions and always going forward in time. so, we look like really long spaghetti people, entangled with other long spaghetti people in a spaghetti people dance that is the fourth dimension.
hmm.. first of all. i'm not 21. second of all. I might be American, but, and it's surprising to even myself, not all Americans are stupid. My IQ is more around 130, and now I'm beginning to doubt that you've taken any sort of physics class, especially theoretical physics. Where are you getting your information from? that's all I want to know.
130 is so low. pathetic. i beat you by 15 points, hahaha. so are you telling me, einstein, that you've never heard of quantum physics before and weren't aware that we have at least 11 dimensions to choose from?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
acutally i'm american and my i.q. is 150. i got it tested a week ago, and i haven't had any brain injuries. so gregjocka3 stop your ignorant comments about americans. Most americans are actually smart. it just so happens that all the dumb ones are on t.v. So please stop your ignorance, and stop watching the media.
1) The possibility for an infinite to be found with finites inside of its own matrix is a fully comprehended fuction since many decades ago.
2) The possibility of having the universe infinite are much more plausible due to the fact that emptiness exists between the molecules. If the Infinite mass enigma were true, where would the lack of mass "aka emptiness" have a place to reside?
And intelligence has nothing to do with boasting,
its actions and achievements that bear the true honor.
GREAT video! I didn't have time to read many of these responses. So, I may be repeating. I am not a physist. With that said . . . Why do we have to focus on moving the object? Why not focus on bending space/time around the object? Wouldn't the object then be standing still? Instead of going from point A to point B; wouldn't point B come to you?
I don't have any formal education in this area, but I find that bending the space time does allow you to instantly reside in a remote location from where you began such as when you folded the paper. This allows you to change location without actually traveling. I also find that by advancing one dimension further would be existing at multiple or all points at one time, or in other words, omnipresence.
im glad your interested in this stuff, but alot and i mean alot of people are aware of everything you said and are working in this field....do you want people to think your smart????whats your point?????do some of your own research.post the results of that,or come to some conclusion/idea of what this means.why just repeat what youve read?????what makes your brain hurt doesnt even scratch the surface..im bored....
You must be bored, trolling around youtube looking for things to criticize. Perhaps you should go get a degree or something. Who cares if a lot of people are working on it? How many of them know how to make a video? Perhaps if you watched the whole thing you would see that I did make my own inferences.
Nope, you hit the nail on the head there, that's exactly what I'm saying. Normal Newtonian Physics won't allow something in space to 'pull' itself, however the gravitomagnetic effect could get around this, potentially. Of course I could be completely wrong, but it's still fun to think about it.
He essentially suggesting the donkey and carrot effect. He's simplifying the upshot - after the craft has been moved forward you would have to move the massive body too - this wouldn't make travel easier - it would just make manned travel less gory ;)
You could place spinning bodies in a chain but they would affect each other requiring lots of energy to hold them. It isn't about making movement easier in general - just making human transport both fast and safe - it's normally very messy indeed.
I was reading some stuff about super conductors...
I read if you spin a super conductor u get the gravity effects you was talking about but also, it said if u spin it fast enough the surface stops reflecting light?
I would love to avoid beltway traffic. Could you tell me how to bend 3 dimensional space through a higher dimension so I can take a quicker route? Thanks.
Gravitomagnetic propulsion would have the same effect on the inhabitants of a spaceship as normal acceleration. The principle of equivalence of General Relativity asserts that gravitational fields and free acceleration are equivalent. So if you could harness Gravitomagnetic propulsion you would simply be causing spacetime to curve rather than accelerating objects in a flat spacetime. Either way, you wouldn't be able to accelerate any quicker than with current technology.
Correct, however you would be accelerating the inhabitants and the ship at the same speed, instead of just accelerating the ship, and having that push / accelerate the inhabitants...
OK, yes I see what you mean now. That's an interesting point. Are there any technical papers on this subject available on the net? What about the NASA / ESA work you mentioned? Where can I read the paper they published?
50 G's would kill a person not because it defys a law, it's because there is a physical constrast in speed between the two which pummels the body. People think too deeply on this subject and think there's more too it. I can see how it raises questions.
I'm more interested on how you would possibly control the gravitomagnitism pulling a ship, which is relative to my last comment on how other forces will effect it. I was a bit unclear on my last statement. Even though its a bit far fetched since most of einstiens 2nd theory of gravity is yet to be completely proven, this new gravitomagnitism does give hope to humanity's future space travel.
Quite interesting, yet if we wanted to use the theory you have devised, then this would mean we would have to succor energy from a nearby energy source. Or in otherwords connect the energy that is produced by the gravitomagnitism to another much more powerful source (IE - A black hole).
if anyone else wants more indepth information on this here is a short paper that goes a little bit more as to whats going on and its broken down mathematically.
arxiv[dot]org / Cornell Library has a paper on it, I can't post the URL
tmscase, check out the "Field Theory" of the late physicist Burkhard Heim. He was a genius in the realm of Einstein but avoided by colleagues b/c there's only a handful of physicists who can grasp his work. He bridged the gap between the General Theory of Relativity and the Principle of Quantitizing in QT (kinda GUT). I've written a short text on this guy and the outcome of his work, the Dröscher/Häuser Field Drive for space travel. If you want it mail me at media-pro-sciences AT mac com.
Interesting coincidence! That actually would make a lot of sense though, because if you did have the power of gravitomagnetism, then you would be able to make the extremely sharp movements that have been reported about UFO's. Without killing all the passengers!
Does anyone else wonder if Deja Vu is a short experience in the fourth dimension? And I mean the third dimesion bending to touch itself, creating a four dimensional experience for the individual trapped in the fold. I was thinking spacetime is wobbling, it isn't still, like a large body of water, it's rippling and moving and sometimes cresting: folding and touching, without us humans doing anything but being there to have a deja vu experience.
It's an interesting thought, however let me be the antagonist here. In my own experience, Deja vu is the feeling that I've been in this situation before. I've never had a 'clear' memory of it actually happening, just a feeling. I think that if time did actually loop, that I would have a duplicate set of memories. Please argue! In my experience, I would attribute it to the situation being similar enough to another situation as to instil a feeling of familiarity.
Didn't Einstein say, if we could just go fast enough, we could get back before we left (Time decreases as velocity increases, however mass would have to increase proportionally to volocity...)
Something like that. If you are going fast enough, time for you appears to slow down, from an outsider's perspecive. So if you were to jet off at the speed of light, then turn around and come back, every one would have aged much quicker than you would have. You could be meeting your grandchildren!
they do say "although the accelerometers feature the lowest noise level presently available. Since the peaks are "only" 100 μg, they have previously not
been observed in measurements for the classical London moment. Nevertheless, they are 30 orders of magnitude higher than what general relativity predicts classically and are therefore of great technological and scientific interest."
Time travel will be possibal and right now we are only about fifteen years in openinga space in time and walking through it and appearing in lets say...Easter Island Or wherever else you desire. Fifteen years, and we know how to fold space
looks like a nice candidate to become the so wanted TEO (theory of everything) I personally hope we can get to experimentally fundament all what is written..
Fascinating - and very entertaining! Now I can imagine how ufos (if they really exist) accellerate and make this unbelievable movements: simply by bending space and time in front of and all around the object. The "persons" inside the object will not notice any accelleration or movement at all, because their atoms are accelerated at the same time and speed. Incredible ...
it's because you can bend a piece of paper that scientists think you can bend time. when you bend a piece of paper you are not only proving you can bend dimensions ( the second, in a piece of paper ) but that you can bend alter space, since space supposedly has a relationship with time why can't we alter time?
granted, I know nothing about physics, this is all speculation...
A friend of mine who does know a lot about physics told me that we can't change time (ie go back or forwards) because it's one dimensional. Think about a tube full of a bunch of bearings (wide enough so there's one bearing after another). Each slice of time is one of these bearings. While the bearings can all move together, you cannot push one back or forwards without the others. This is the feature of one dimensional space.
thats right except that we all experience the bearing differently, we all have our own yard stick and watch, that can differ but still both be right. here you bend the paper you skip the alterations to your clock as you travel point A to B. what effects space effects time
how the fuck do u bent space and time. It's easy to bent that piece of paper, but time is just there, you can't control it. I don't know jack about physics, but im just wondering here.
It doesn't only imply rewriting quantum theory, but based on what you said, it sounds like it counters quantum theory. I can imagine why ppl would thus find it hard to beleive...
very interesting, i think that quantum theory will be re-written again,
since the whole photon wave fiasco, but if there is a possibl way of reproducing these results on a larger scale
and warp timespace in a controlloble way
timetravel would be possible, if a 100% pure result was possible it would be feasible to break through the limitations of spacetime. who know there may be an entire new reality with its own laws beyond, the only limit would be your imagination
You don't need a creative introduction, you sick bastard. :D
CatEarAddict 1 week ago
do you know about the mer ka ba time travel ?
momskid 1 month ago
thanks
momskid 1 month ago
Scientists talking about bending space time to travel huge distances is a bit of a waste of time, I love quantum theory but AS FAR AS WE KNOW no-one has even produced useable antigravity or designed anything that will power this technology becase lets be honest it must need huge amounts of energy, space bending? we need to walk first! i dont know about the rest of youtube but im sick of being governed and amazing technologies behing held from us! Any ideas on how to change this? PM me...
cowpow1234 2 years ago
HHHmmmmmmmm.... interesting...
newsteadstuiosfx 2 years ago
im 12 years old, amazingly i understand this and quantum theory easily. is this normal?
gamefan992 2 years ago
Do you understand calculus?
dopplerdog2000 2 years ago
@gamefan992 do you know how to calculate finite potential wells?
Dogslax3333 2 years ago
@Dogslax3333 using mathematics maybe
snylekkie 10 months ago
If the universe was infinite, well theres an infinite amount of reasons why this is impossible. It means that there are an infinite amoubnt of everything in the universe. which means tHAT THERE WOULD BE INFINITE BIG BANGS IN THE UNIVERSE, INFINITE CRUNCHES, THERE WOULD BE NO UNIVERSE AND A UNIVERSE AT THE SAME TIME, PHYSICS WOULD AND WOULDN'T EXIST. SEVERAL PROBLEMS WITH THIS. I MIGHT HAVE TO MAKE A VIDEO ABOUT IT. BUT I HOPE YOU SOMEWHAT GET MY POINT.
symphanyofdestructin 3 years ago
Ok so I'm having discussions with Nate and reading up on shit, but whom do I see online but someone whom I party with in Winnipeg. I totally know you man, we must chat.
krazytea 3 years ago
my theory is, we will have to look at nonlinear dynamics in order to figure all this out
I disagree w/ physicists like Kaku in that I don;t think that singularity (a theory of everything) is the way to 'figure out' the underlying principles of the universe... I think that the principles are infinite b/c the universe is infinite - we are simply finite BEINGS... :D
RamzGT 3 years ago
0 kelvin is impossible, completly stopping the motion of particles is very risky, you would need tremendous energy
Drecconard 3 years ago
god i fucking hate people who dont just record a straight feed and cut and paste clips together every 5 seconds, also your hair is fuckin dummm reminds me of middle school
phalxor 3 years ago
The information is accurate, the presentation... is funny. Thanks.
stellartech 3 years ago
clearly scripted. you cut every 2 seconds. you suck.
bayardeats 3 years ago
The experiment where these Gyros were used is called Gravity Probe B.
lemrock 3 years ago
just one small question, if mass increases as speed increases, then why don't fighter jets implode, I mean, the mass is equivalent to the density?
hotterdonna 4 years ago
It is not true, that mass increases when speed increases. The term e = m c2 has been a helper for maths. Not for reality. It deals with comparison of rest mass. But also rest mass is a concept and not real. There is no rest mass in the universe, since everything travels around.
Why should the density increase when speed increases? And in relation to what? Fighter jets aren't fast. Looking for something fast? Whats about the earth traveling around the sun? Approx. 109000 km/h. Still slow to me.
WolYou 3 years ago
I though you only got super conduction at 0 kelvin? I could be wrong though..
boredtodeathwth 4 years ago 2
actually, 130 isn't low. 100 is the average IQ. Yes, I've heard of Quantum Mechanics, and it's string theory that suggests 10 or 11 dimensions, or at least that's what the math gives us. and I highly doubt that someone with an IQ of 145 would speak like a 5 year old.
6sully8391 4 years ago
more, pleaseQ
fractalspiral 4 years ago
Saw your videos. How cool! A nerdy DJ just like me! I too am a fan of astrophysics!
DJBrokenHigh 4 years ago
"Think of a 2 dimensional person, like an ant" ??? Last time i checked ants were 3 dimensional and not people. But take it as constructive criticism. Your video was very educational and kept me looking up quantum physic and string theory videos on youtube for hours. thanks
vegaslimo 4 years ago
ants are four-dimensional twit. they have time too. god, vegaslimo, you're soooooo stupid.
gregjockca3 4 years ago
i hope you're not serious... we live IN a three dimensional world, and FEEL the effect of the fourth dimensional. Otherwise we would be able to imagine a 4th dimensiona hypercube, or reassemble a tessaract into the fourth dimension.
6sully8391 4 years ago
no retard. in four dimensions, we look like slithering spaghetti people, like long waves of noodles through spacetime.
gregjockca3 4 years ago
just wondering. how much education do you have in theoretical physics?? and where did you learn that?
6sully8391 4 years ago
you're a 21yo **AMERICAN** (ie. IQ of 12) so go back to your swampland, jeb. everyone knows that if you envision a human being in four-dimensions, you'll see a trail of that person's body going this way and that in three spatial dimensions and always going forward in time. so, we look like really long spaghetti people, entangled with other long spaghetti people in a spaghetti people dance that is the fourth dimension.
gregjockca3 4 years ago
hmm.. first of all. i'm not 21. second of all. I might be American, but, and it's surprising to even myself, not all Americans are stupid. My IQ is more around 130, and now I'm beginning to doubt that you've taken any sort of physics class, especially theoretical physics. Where are you getting your information from? that's all I want to know.
6sully8391 4 years ago 2
130 is so low. pathetic. i beat you by 15 points, hahaha. so are you telling me, einstein, that you've never heard of quantum physics before and weren't aware that we have at least 11 dimensions to choose from?
gregjockca3 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
acutally i'm american and my i.q. is 150. i got it tested a week ago, and i haven't had any brain injuries. so gregjocka3 stop your ignorant comments about americans. Most americans are actually smart. it just so happens that all the dumb ones are on t.v. So please stop your ignorance, and stop watching the media.
symphanyofdestructin 3 years ago
1) The possibility for an infinite to be found with finites inside of its own matrix is a fully comprehended fuction since many decades ago.
2) The possibility of having the universe infinite are much more plausible due to the fact that emptiness exists between the molecules. If the Infinite mass enigma were true, where would the lack of mass "aka emptiness" have a place to reside?
And intelligence has nothing to do with boasting,
its actions and achievements that bear the true honor.
Goodday
STOPnTHINK 2 years ago
GREAT video! I didn't have time to read many of these responses. So, I may be repeating. I am not a physist. With that said . . . Why do we have to focus on moving the object? Why not focus on bending space/time around the object? Wouldn't the object then be standing still? Instead of going from point A to point B; wouldn't point B come to you?
loreleikg 4 years ago
I don't have any formal education in this area, but I find that bending the space time does allow you to instantly reside in a remote location from where you began such as when you folded the paper. This allows you to change location without actually traveling. I also find that by advancing one dimension further would be existing at multiple or all points at one time, or in other words, omnipresence.
LazarusD 4 years ago
its one piece of research, I think you are getting a little ahead of yourself (and a little illogical) with your spaceship ideas.
Remember, even New Scientist sometimes publishes crack science.
h**p://*ww.newscientist*com/channel/fundamentals/mg19225771.800-gravitys-secret.html
drewtang69 4 years ago
Isn't that the point? to get ahead of ourselfs and then try to obtain that which we imagine?
spongah 4 years ago
im glad your interested in this stuff, but alot and i mean alot of people are aware of everything you said and are working in this field....do you want people to think your smart????whats your point?????do some of your own research.post the results of that,or come to some conclusion/idea of what this means.why just repeat what youve read?????what makes your brain hurt doesnt even scratch the surface..im bored....
30NAKERS 4 years ago
You must be bored, trolling around youtube looking for things to criticize. Perhaps you should go get a degree or something. Who cares if a lot of people are working on it? How many of them know how to make a video? Perhaps if you watched the whole thing you would see that I did make my own inferences.
tmscase 4 years ago
@30NAKERS I didn't know anything about Gravitomagnetism until I saw this video and found it very interesting.
Not everyone works in this field and so I'm glad he made the video to share the information.
By the way, you are a prick.
PsySwitch1983 10 months ago
I am so surprised that me, a 14 yr.old african american boy that live in the hood, might acually and completely understand where u are getting at.
so is it that u are saying that bending time & space to create a vortex in front of u would "pull" u through space?
or am i coming at this subject way too strong?
superman20112001 4 years ago
Nope, you hit the nail on the head there, that's exactly what I'm saying. Normal Newtonian Physics won't allow something in space to 'pull' itself, however the gravitomagnetic effect could get around this, potentially. Of course I could be completely wrong, but it's still fun to think about it.
tmscase 4 years ago
@tmscase there is no such thing as gravitomagnetic effect.
snylekkie 10 months ago
He essentially suggesting the donkey and carrot effect. He's simplifying the upshot - after the craft has been moved forward you would have to move the massive body too - this wouldn't make travel easier - it would just make manned travel less gory ;)
You could place spinning bodies in a chain but they would affect each other requiring lots of energy to hold them. It isn't about making movement easier in general - just making human transport both fast and safe - it's normally very messy indeed.
tricky778 4 years ago
I was reading some stuff about super conductors...
I read if you spin a super conductor u get the gravity effects you was talking about but also, it said if u spin it fast enough the surface stops reflecting light?
lebensborn666 4 years ago
Yeah, I think he's lying about not being scripted, but good luck directing.
calebpiercy 4 years ago
hahahahaha stopt it stop it ...
coachpizza 4 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH sorry you are funny, space cannot be bent IT IS ALREADY BENT for you we need to find oue where?
coachpizza 4 years ago
I would love to avoid beltway traffic. Could you tell me how to bend 3 dimensional space through a higher dimension so I can take a quicker route? Thanks.
newmac 4 years ago
Gravitomagnetic propulsion would have the same effect on the inhabitants of a spaceship as normal acceleration. The principle of equivalence of General Relativity asserts that gravitational fields and free acceleration are equivalent. So if you could harness Gravitomagnetic propulsion you would simply be causing spacetime to curve rather than accelerating objects in a flat spacetime. Either way, you wouldn't be able to accelerate any quicker than with current technology.
dph79 4 years ago
Correct, however you would be accelerating the inhabitants and the ship at the same speed, instead of just accelerating the ship, and having that push / accelerate the inhabitants...
tmscase 4 years ago
OK, yes I see what you mean now. That's an interesting point. Are there any technical papers on this subject available on the net? What about the NASA / ESA work you mentioned? Where can I read the paper they published?
dph79 4 years ago
Youtube won't let me put it in the comments, however I've updated the video description with the link to the experiment report.
tmscase 4 years ago
50 G's would kill a person not because it defys a law, it's because there is a physical constrast in speed between the two which pummels the body. People think too deeply on this subject and think there's more too it. I can see how it raises questions.
JayZoop 4 years ago
I'm more interested on how you would possibly control the gravitomagnitism pulling a ship, which is relative to my last comment on how other forces will effect it. I was a bit unclear on my last statement. Even though its a bit far fetched since most of einstiens 2nd theory of gravity is yet to be completely proven, this new gravitomagnitism does give hope to humanity's future space travel.
tdcr1986 4 years ago
Quite interesting, yet if we wanted to use the theory you have devised, then this would mean we would have to succor energy from a nearby energy source. Or in otherwords connect the energy that is produced by the gravitomagnitism to another much more powerful source (IE - A black hole).
tdcr1986 4 years ago
ive seen the vid hes talking about. its sweet (google "imagning the 10 dimentions" and on the 1st site search till you find a flash of the same name
hallucinaJason 4 years ago
if anyone else wants more indepth information on this here is a short paper that goes a little bit more as to whats going on and its broken down mathematically.
arxiv[dot]org / Cornell Library has a paper on it, I can't post the URL
FA2A 4 years ago
he is the love child of bono and marge simpson, lol.
bentoobz 4 years ago
Haha good one man!
tmscase 4 years ago
tmscase, check out the "Field Theory" of the late physicist Burkhard Heim. He was a genius in the realm of Einstein but avoided by colleagues b/c there's only a handful of physicists who can grasp his work. He bridged the gap between the General Theory of Relativity and the Principle of Quantitizing in QT (kinda GUT). I've written a short text on this guy and the outcome of his work, the Dröscher/Häuser Field Drive for space travel. If you want it mail me at media-pro-sciences AT mac com.
macmarine 4 years ago
what's the song that plays at the very beginning of your video?
jaketodd1 4 years ago
Tin Girl - Tin Love by Doll Factory
tmscase 4 years ago
mannn. what did you score on your SATs!
sportsman214 4 years ago
dood we don't have sats in canada :-) anyways - this stuff only takes a little imagination, mixed with some reading. Thanks for the comment though!
tmscase 4 years ago
ok....
tmscase 4 years ago
BTW, (I used to look up this stuff) a UFO spacecraft described by anonymous scientists were:
edgeless inside of and outside of the spacecraft, iow, everything was round
had three coil things? that created a gravitational disturbance in front of the spacecraft to pull it forwards.
Did you read that too? Or is this an interesting coincidence in thought.
o00o0o0o0o0o 4 years ago
Interesting coincidence! That actually would make a lot of sense though, because if you did have the power of gravitomagnetism, then you would be able to make the extremely sharp movements that have been reported about UFO's. Without killing all the passengers!
tmscase 4 years ago
Does anyone else wonder if Deja Vu is a short experience in the fourth dimension? And I mean the third dimesion bending to touch itself, creating a four dimensional experience for the individual trapped in the fold. I was thinking spacetime is wobbling, it isn't still, like a large body of water, it's rippling and moving and sometimes cresting: folding and touching, without us humans doing anything but being there to have a deja vu experience.
todaugen 4 years ago
It's an interesting thought, however let me be the antagonist here. In my own experience, Deja vu is the feeling that I've been in this situation before. I've never had a 'clear' memory of it actually happening, just a feeling. I think that if time did actually loop, that I would have a duplicate set of memories. Please argue! In my experience, I would attribute it to the situation being similar enough to another situation as to instil a feeling of familiarity.
tmscase 4 years ago
Didn't Einstein say, if we could just go fast enough, we could get back before we left (Time decreases as velocity increases, however mass would have to increase proportionally to volocity...)
EnderGate 4 years ago
Something like that. If you are going fast enough, time for you appears to slow down, from an outsider's perspecive. So if you were to jet off at the speed of light, then turn around and come back, every one would have aged much quicker than you would have. You could be meeting your grandchildren!
tmscase 4 years ago
I found a paper written on this experiment. While the results are not entirely conclusive (because of SNR)
tmscase 4 years ago
they do say "although the accelerometers feature the lowest noise level presently available. Since the peaks are "only" 100 μg, they have previously not
been observed in measurements for the classical London moment. Nevertheless, they are 30 orders of magnitude higher than what general relativity predicts classically and are therefore of great technological and scientific interest."
tmscase 4 years ago
ok, I know what subject I'm going to apply in University now ^^'.
Michael880716 5 years ago
Time travel will be possibal and right now we are only about fifteen years in openinga space in time and walking through it and appearing in lets say...Easter Island Or wherever else you desire. Fifteen years, and we know how to fold space
nebder9 5 years ago
in a future time travel will possible...
"string theory"
looks like a nice candidate to become the so wanted TEO (theory of everything) I personally hope we can get to experimentally fundament all what is written..
salut
tomyturbado 5 years ago
"duplicate"
"duplicate"
separate a point?
Yes yes i remember now, i too learned that from pseudolinearalgebra.
timidthoughts 5 years ago
wow...u theorists are cracy...its awesome tho
fatfishy888 5 years ago
Fascinating - and very entertaining! Now I can imagine how ufos (if they really exist) accellerate and make this unbelievable movements: simply by bending space and time in front of and all around the object. The "persons" inside the object will not notice any accelleration or movement at all, because their atoms are accelerated at the same time and speed. Incredible ...
vipmarco 5 years ago
You hit the nail right on the head!
tmscase 5 years ago
Some people say, 'The shortest distance between two points is a straight line.'
Well, I always say, 'the shortest distance between two points is to realize there is no point.'
Wrap your head around that one :)
SolSkye 5 years ago
You do realize that we only exist in our own projections then....
tmscase 5 years ago
no, the projection realizes it though cuz that's just how I dreamt him up.
blahinhawaii 5 years ago
-Interesting stuff!
-Where can I find more information on the experiments?
ShinsengumiTaicho1 5 years ago
it's because you can bend a piece of paper that scientists think you can bend time. when you bend a piece of paper you are not only proving you can bend dimensions ( the second, in a piece of paper ) but that you can bend alter space, since space supposedly has a relationship with time why can't we alter time?
granted, I know nothing about physics, this is all speculation...
eerieyellowlights 5 years ago
A friend of mine who does know a lot about physics told me that we can't change time (ie go back or forwards) because it's one dimensional. Think about a tube full of a bunch of bearings (wide enough so there's one bearing after another). Each slice of time is one of these bearings. While the bearings can all move together, you cannot push one back or forwards without the others. This is the feature of one dimensional space.
tmscase 5 years ago
thats right except that we all experience the bearing differently, we all have our own yard stick and watch, that can differ but still both be right. here you bend the paper you skip the alterations to your clock as you travel point A to B. what effects space effects time
kapwns 5 years ago
how the fuck do u bent space and time. It's easy to bent that piece of paper, but time is just there, you can't control it. I don't know jack about physics, but im just wondering here.
gator153 5 years ago
lol... QM on Youtube is like... oh... haha.. well.. at least 188 people were interested enough to listen to this...
Letranger 5 years ago
Hehe yeah, not looking to be famous or popular, just a good place to put vids for my personal blog site. Thanks for watching
tmscase 5 years ago
It doesn't only imply rewriting quantum theory, but based on what you said, it sounds like it counters quantum theory. I can imagine why ppl would thus find it hard to beleive...
berk12000 5 years ago
very interesting, i think that quantum theory will be re-written again,
since the whole photon wave fiasco, but if there is a possibl way of reproducing these results on a larger scale
and warp timespace in a controlloble way
timetravel would be possible, if a 100% pure result was possible it would be feasible to break through the limitations of spacetime. who know there may be an entire new reality with its own laws beyond, the only limit would be your imagination
johnaiton 5 years ago