Added: 5 years ago
From: tmscase
Views: 18,061
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (86)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You don't need a creative introduction, you sick bastard. :D

  • do you know about the mer ka ba time travel ?

  • thanks

  • Scientists talking about bending space time to travel huge distances is a bit of a waste of time, I love quantum theory but AS FAR AS WE KNOW no-one has even produced useable antigravity or designed anything that will power this technology becase lets be honest it must need huge amounts of energy, space bending? we need to walk first! i dont know about the rest of youtube but im sick of being governed and amazing technologies behing held from us! Any ideas on how to change this? PM me...

  • HHHmmmmmmmm.... interesting...

  • im 12 years old, amazingly i understand this and quantum theory easily. is this normal?

  • Do you understand calculus?

  • @gamefan992 do you know how to calculate finite potential wells?

  • @Dogslax3333 using mathematics maybe

  • If the universe was infinite, well theres an infinite amount of reasons why this is impossible. It means that there are an infinite amoubnt of everything in the universe. which means tHAT THERE WOULD BE INFINITE BIG BANGS IN THE UNIVERSE, INFINITE CRUNCHES, THERE WOULD BE NO UNIVERSE AND A UNIVERSE AT THE SAME TIME, PHYSICS WOULD AND WOULDN'T EXIST. SEVERAL PROBLEMS WITH THIS. I MIGHT HAVE TO MAKE A VIDEO ABOUT IT. BUT I HOPE YOU SOMEWHAT GET MY POINT.

  • Ok so I'm having discussions with Nate and reading up on shit, but whom do I see online but someone whom I party with in Winnipeg. I totally know you man, we must chat.

  • my theory is, we will have to look at nonlinear dynamics in order to figure all this out

    I disagree w/ physicists like Kaku in that I don;t think that singularity (a theory of everything) is the way to 'figure out' the underlying principles of the universe... I think that the principles are infinite b/c the universe is infinite - we are simply finite BEINGS... :D

  • 0 kelvin is impossible, completly stopping the motion of particles is very risky, you would need tremendous energy

  • god i fucking hate people who dont just record a straight feed and cut and paste clips together every 5 seconds, also your hair is fuckin dummm reminds me of middle school

  • The information is accurate, the presentation... is funny. Thanks.

  • clearly scripted. you cut every 2 seconds. you suck.

  • The experiment where these Gyros were used is called Gravity Probe B.

  • just one small question, if mass increases as speed increases, then why don't fighter jets implode, I mean, the mass is equivalent to the density?

  • It is not true, that mass increases when speed increases. The term e = m c2 has been a helper for maths. Not for reality. It deals with comparison of rest mass. But also rest mass is a concept and not real. There is no rest mass in the universe, since everything travels around.

    Why should the density increase when speed increases? And in relation to what? Fighter jets aren't fast. Looking for something fast? Whats about the earth traveling around the sun? Approx. 109000 km/h. Still slow to me.

  • I though you only got super conduction at 0 kelvin? I could be wrong though..

  • actually, 130 isn't low. 100 is the average IQ. Yes, I've heard of Quantum Mechanics, and it's string theory that suggests 10 or 11 dimensions, or at least that's what the math gives us. and I highly doubt that someone with an IQ of 145 would speak like a 5 year old.

  • more, pleaseQ

  • Saw your videos. How cool! A nerdy DJ just like me! I too am a fan of astrophysics!

  • "Think of a 2 dimensional person, like an ant" ??? Last time i checked ants were 3 dimensional and not people. But take it as constructive criticism. Your video was very educational and kept me looking up quantum physic and string theory videos on youtube for hours. thanks

  • ants are four-dimensional twit. they have time too. god, vegaslimo, you're soooooo stupid.

  • i hope you're not serious... we live IN a three dimensional world, and FEEL the effect of the fourth dimensional. Otherwise we would be able to imagine a 4th dimensiona hypercube, or reassemble a tessaract into the fourth dimension.

  • no retard. in four dimensions, we look like slithering spaghetti people, like long waves of noodles through spacetime.

  • just wondering. how much education do you have in theoretical physics?? and where did you learn that?

  • you're a 21yo **AMERICAN** (ie. IQ of 12) so go back to your swampland, jeb. everyone knows that if you envision a human being in four-dimensions, you'll see a trail of that person's body going this way and that in three spatial dimensions and always going forward in time. so, we look like really long spaghetti people, entangled with other long spaghetti people in a spaghetti people dance that is the fourth dimension.

  • hmm.. first of all. i'm not 21. second of all. I might be American, but, and it's surprising to even myself, not all Americans are stupid. My IQ is more around 130, and now I'm beginning to doubt that you've taken any sort of physics class, especially theoretical physics. Where are you getting your information from? that's all I want to know.

  • 130 is so low. pathetic. i beat you by 15 points, hahaha. so are you telling me, einstein, that you've never heard of quantum physics before and weren't aware that we have at least 11 dimensions to choose from?

  • 1) The possibility for an infinite to be found with finites inside of its own matrix is a fully comprehended fuction since many decades ago.

    2) The possibility of having the universe infinite are much more plausible due to the fact that emptiness exists between the molecules. If the Infinite mass enigma were true, where would the lack of mass "aka emptiness" have a place to reside?

    And intelligence has nothing to do with boasting,

    its actions and achievements that bear the true honor.

    Goodday

  • GREAT video! I didn't have time to read many of these responses. So, I may be repeating. I am not a physist. With that said . . . Why do we have to focus on moving the object? Why not focus on bending space/time around the object? Wouldn't the object then be standing still? Instead of going from point A to point B; wouldn't point B come to you?

  • I don't have any formal education in this area, but I find that bending the space time does allow you to instantly reside in a remote location from where you began such as when you folded the paper. This allows you to change location without actually traveling. I also find that by advancing one dimension further would be existing at multiple or all points at one time, or in other words, omnipresence.

  • its one piece of research, I think you are getting a little ahead of yourself (and a little illogical) with your spaceship ideas.

    Remember, even New Scientist sometimes publishes crack science.

    h**p://*ww.newscientist*com/ch­annel/fundamentals/mg19225771.­800-gravitys-secret.html

  • Isn't that the point? to get ahead of ourselfs and then try to obtain that which we imagine?

  • im glad your interested in this stuff, but alot and i mean alot of people are aware of everything you said and are working in this field....do you want people to think your smart????whats your point?????do some of your own research.post the results of that,or come to some conclusion/idea of what this means.why just repeat what youve read?????what makes your brain hurt doesnt even scratch the surface..im bored....

  • You must be bored, trolling around youtube looking for things to criticize.  Perhaps you should go get a degree or something. Who cares if a lot of people are working on it? How many of them know how to make a video? Perhaps if you watched the whole thing you would see that I did make my own inferences.

  • @30NAKERS I didn't know anything about Gravitomagnetism until I saw this video and found it very interesting.

    Not everyone works in this field and so I'm glad he made the video to share the information.

    By the way, you are a prick.

  • I am so surprised that me, a 14 yr.old african american boy that live in the hood, might acually and completely understand where u are getting at.

    so is it that u are saying that bending time & space to create a vortex in front of u would "pull" u through space?

    or am i coming at this subject way too strong?

  • Nope, you hit the nail on the head there, that's exactly what I'm saying. Normal Newtonian Physics won't allow something in space to 'pull' itself, however the gravitomagnetic effect could get around this, potentially. Of course I could be completely wrong, but it's still fun to think about it.

  • @tmscase there is no such thing as gravitomagnetic effect.

  • He essentially suggesting the donkey and carrot effect. He's simplifying the upshot - after the craft has been moved forward you would have to move the massive body too - this wouldn't make travel easier - it would just make manned travel less gory ;)

    You could place spinning bodies in a chain but they would affect each other requiring lots of energy to hold them. It isn't about making movement easier in general - just making human transport both fast and safe - it's normally very messy indeed.

  • I was reading some stuff about super conductors...

    I read if you spin a super conductor u get the gravity effects you was talking about but also, it said if u spin it fast enough the surface stops reflecting light?

  • Yeah, I think he's lying about not being scripted, but good luck directing.

  • hahahahaha stopt it stop it ...

  • HAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH­AHAHAH sorry you are funny, space cannot be bent IT IS ALREADY BENT for you we need to find oue where?

  • I would love to avoid beltway traffic. Could you tell me how to bend 3 dimensional space through a higher dimension so I can take a quicker route? Thanks.

  • Gravitomagnetic propulsion would have the same effect on the inhabitants of a spaceship as normal acceleration. The principle of equivalence of General Relativity asserts that gravitational fields and free acceleration are equivalent. So if you could harness Gravitomagnetic propulsion you would simply be causing spacetime to curve rather than accelerating objects in a flat spacetime. Either way, you wouldn't be able to accelerate any quicker than with current technology.

  • Correct, however you would be accelerating the inhabitants and the ship at the same speed, instead of just accelerating the ship, and having that push / accelerate the inhabitants...

  • OK, yes I see what you mean now. That's an interesting point. Are there any technical papers on this subject available on the net? What about the NASA / ESA work you mentioned? Where can I read the paper they published?

  • Youtube won't let me put it in the comments, however I've updated the video description with the link to the experiment report.

  • 50 G's would kill a person not because it defys a law, it's because there is a physical constrast in speed between the two which pummels the body. People think too deeply on this subject and think there's more too it. I can see how it raises questions.

  • I'm more interested on how you would possibly control the gravitomagnitism pulling a ship, which is relative to my last comment on how other forces will effect it. I was a bit unclear on my last statement. Even though its a bit far fetched since most of einstiens 2nd theory of gravity is yet to be completely proven, this new gravitomagnitism does give hope to humanity's future space travel.

  • Quite interesting, yet if we wanted to use the theory you have devised, then this would mean we would have to succor energy from a nearby energy source. Or in otherwords connect the energy that is produced by the gravitomagnitism to another much more powerful source (IE - A black hole).

  • ive seen the vid hes talking about. its sweet (google "imagning the 10 dimentions" and on the 1st site search till you find a flash of the same name

  • if anyone else wants more indepth information on this here is a short paper that goes a little bit more as to whats going on and its broken down mathematically.

    arxiv[dot]org / Cornell Library has a paper on it, I can't post the URL

  • he is the love child of bono and marge simpson, lol.

  • Haha good one man!

  • tmscase, check out the "Field Theory" of the late physicist Burkhard Heim. He was a genius in the realm of Einstein but avoided by colleagues b/c there's only a handful of physicists who can grasp his work. He bridged the gap between the General Theory of Relativity and the Principle of Quantitizing in QT (kinda GUT). I've written a short text on this guy and the outcome of his work, the Dröscher/Häuser Field Drive for space travel. If you want it mail me at media-pro-sciences AT mac com.

  • what's the song that plays at the very beginning of your video?

  • Tin Girl - Tin Love by Doll Factory

  • mannn. what did you score on your SATs!

  • dood we don't have sats in canada :-) anyways - this stuff only takes a little imagination, mixed with some reading. Thanks for the comment though!

  • ok....

  • BTW, (I used to look up this stuff) a UFO spacecraft described by anonymous scientists were:

    edgeless inside of and outside of the spacecraft, iow, everything was round

    had three coil things? that created a gravitational disturbance in front of the spacecraft to pull it forwards.

    Did you read that too? Or is this an interesting coincidence in thought.

  • Interesting coincidence! That actually would make a lot of sense though, because if you did have the power of gravitomagnetism, then you would be able to make the extremely sharp movements that have been reported about UFO's. Without killing all the passengers!

  • Does anyone else wonder if Deja Vu is a short experience in the fourth dimension? And I mean the third dimesion bending to touch itself, creating a four dimensional experience for the individual trapped in the fold. I was thinking spacetime is wobbling, it isn't still, like a large body of water, it's rippling and moving and sometimes cresting: folding and touching, without us humans doing anything but being there to have a deja vu experience.

  • It's an interesting thought, however let me be the antagonist here. In my own experience, Deja vu is the feeling that I've been in this situation before. I've never had a 'clear' memory of it actually happening, just a feeling. I think that if time did actually loop, that I would have a duplicate set of memories. Please argue! In my experience, I would attribute it to the situation being similar enough to another situation as to instil a feeling of familiarity.

  • Didn't Einstein say, if we could just go fast enough, we could get back before we left (Time decreases as velocity increases, however mass would have to increase proportionally to volocity...)

  • Something like that. If you are going fast enough, time for you appears to slow down, from an outsider's perspecive. So if you were to jet off at the speed of light, then turn around and come back, every one would have aged much quicker than you would have. You could be meeting your grandchildren!

  • I found a paper written on this experiment. While the results are not entirely conclusive (because of SNR)

  • they do say "although the accelerometers feature the lowest noise level presently available. Since the peaks are "only" 100 μg, they have previously not

    been observed in measurements for the classical London moment. Nevertheless, they are 30 orders of magnitude higher than what general relativity predicts classically and are therefore of great technological and scientific interest."

  • ok, I know what subject I'm going to apply in University now ^^'.

  • Time travel will be possibal and right now we are only about fifteen years in openinga space in time and walking through it and appearing in lets say...Easter Island Or wherever else you desire. Fifteen years, and we know how to fold space

  • in a future time travel will possible...

    "string theory"

    looks like a nice candidate to become the so wanted TEO (theory of everything) I personally hope we can get to experimentally fundament all what is written..

    salut

  • "duplicate"

    "duplicate"

    separate a point?

    Yes yes i remember now, i too learned that from pseudolinearalgebra.

  • wow...u theorists are cracy...its awesome tho

  • Fascinating - and very entertaining! Now I can imagine how ufos (if they really exist) accellerate and make this unbelievable movements: simply by bending space and time in front of and all around the object. The "persons" inside the object will not notice any accelleration or movement at all, because their atoms are accelerated at the same time and speed. Incredible ...

  • You hit the nail right on the head!

  • Some people say, 'The shortest distance between two points is a straight line.'

    Well, I always say, 'the shortest distance between two points is to realize there is no point.'

    Wrap your head around that one :)

  • You do realize that we only exist in our own projections then....

  • no, the projection realizes it though cuz that's just how I dreamt him up.

  • -Interesting stuff!

    -Where can I find more information on the experiments?

  • it's because you can bend a piece of paper that scientists think you can bend time. when you bend a piece of paper you are not only proving you can bend dimensions ( the second, in a piece of paper ) but that you can bend alter space, since space supposedly has a relationship with time why can't we alter time?

    granted, I know nothing about physics, this is all speculation...

  • A friend of mine who does know a lot about physics told me that we can't change time (ie go back or forwards) because it's one dimensional. Think about a tube full of a bunch of bearings (wide enough so there's one bearing after another). Each slice of time is one of these bearings. While the bearings can all move together, you cannot push one back or forwards without the others. This is the feature of one dimensional space.

  • thats right except that we all experience the bearing differently, we all have our own yard stick and watch, that can differ but still both be right. here you bend the paper you skip the alterations to your clock as you travel point A to B. what effects space effects time

  • how the fuck do u bent space and time. It's easy to bent that piece of paper, but time is just there, you can't control it. I don't know jack about physics, but im just wondering here.

  • lol... QM on Youtube is like... oh... haha.. well.. at least 188 people were interested enough to listen to this...

  • Hehe yeah, not looking to be famous or popular, just a good place to put vids for my personal blog site. Thanks for watching

  • It doesn't only imply rewriting quantum theory, but based on what you said, it sounds like it counters quantum theory. I can imagine why ppl would thus find it hard to beleive...

  • very interesting, i think that quantum theory will be re-written again,

    since the whole photon wave fiasco, but if there is a possibl way of reproducing these results on a larger scale

    and warp timespace in a controlloble way

    timetravel would be possible, if a 100% pure result was possible it would be feasible to break through the limitations of spacetime. who know there may be an entire new reality with its own laws beyond, the only limit would be your imagination

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more