Added: 2 years ago
From: gpjam
Views: 28,432
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 50,000lbs up monteagle @ 70mph WITH 500HP MOTOR!!!! SOUNDS LIKE BULL#$%&*! TO ME!!! LMAO!!

  • @MasterWitchDoctor..of course you have a friend, so you have no first hand experience. 50,000 up Monteagle( thats how its actually spelled),@ 70 mph and never drops a gear. 600 CATS dont even do it. im a trucker and ive run Tennessee for yrs and ur full of shit. quit telling stories, mother goose. keep playing with ur tinker toys.

  • Comment removed

  • Lol nice video and truck

  • Judging from the camera angle, you must be well over 6ft tall ;) Love the engine sound too

  • Sorry nokiaicon. No Detroit Diesel wishes to be a big cam cummins.

  • @CSXtrackworker a big cam 500 Cummins > 12v71 N. Cummins doesn't leak oil, have the exhaust rack get out of sequence, or is so loud you can't hear yourself think. The 71 series Detroits were weaklings compared to the Cummins and they burned a lot more fuel. On average the 12v71 burned 20 gph or more. In a boat a Detroit was the way to go, in a truck Cummins NTC blew them away.

  • @MasterWitchDoctor Sorry bud, I disagree with you. We have a mix of old big cam cummins as well as our old detroits and they all leak the same amount of oil. Even some of our new detroits and new cummins motors leak a lil oil. It is common for this on diesels after a while no matter how much you baby them. Your smaller detroits lacked on power but once you got into the 8 and 12v series and the 60 series, then you had your power.

  • @CSXtrackworker 8V71s have power? ROFL @ THAT ONE!!! They can't pull a toothpick out of a club sandwich. Point in case here in Tennessee is I-24 west bound a hill named Mount Eagle. A friend of mine has an 83 Pete with a Cummins NTC rated at 500 hp he uses to haul steel from Birmingham Alabama. He can run up Mount Eagle 70 mph with 50,000 lbs on steel and never have to down shift. Every 71 or 92 series Detroit I've ever seen can't even come close to doing that. Detroits are crap and weak.

  • Too much racket poor detroit wants to be a Big Cam Cummins

  • @nokiaicon it's the other way around.

  • Howd you get that truck over there???

  • Dang them tandems are spread.

  • nice truck respect

  • Looks like she needed more room to run.

  • ok cooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo­oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo­ool i LLLOOOVVVEEE THAT SOUND ( i come from Germany! oyu??)

  • sry but is it Turbo cahrged or not? :P

  • @unclewilly2 supercharged, but its considered naturally aspirated. 2 stroke diesels require forced induction so they don't 'choke' on their own exhaust

  • @unclewilly2 no that's just a reg. old 12v71. They have blowers.

  • @farmerallis takes a old 2 stroke diesel much more than a modern 4 stroke ? so could you if you answr answer in L/100 KM oder L/60 Miles

  • @unclewilly2 Seems to be a language barrier here...I don't understand what you're asking. Are you asking about fuel mileage campard to a 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke?

  • @farmerallis i mean gallon to the mile ;)

  • @unclewilly2 I'm not sure what like of fuel mileage these old Detroits get. Perhaps someone else can chime in on the subject. I know 2 strokes tend to use more fuel compared to a 4 stroke, but that's about all I can tell you about that.

  • @farmerallis ok i allready knew that a 2- stroke takes more i have a 2 stroke scooter ;) but i wanna know how much they take precisely

    ;) but

    TY

  • @farmerallis ...Here in the mountains of Colorado...it's not true that a two stroke is less efficient than the four stroker...I generally don't chime in - this being the first time...and I didn't realize sooo many people were still 'Droit bonkers. Anyways, we've been married to Terex and 'Droit since the 60's...suppose I'll weigh in on some of these. To give you an idea...our Silver 92(8V92TT), in a '79 GMC General will get about 5mpg loaded to 95k gross...our Series 60 does about the same.

  • @SummitAggregates Thanks for chiming in. 5mpg is actually pretty good mileage, even for today's standards.

  • ...Here in the mountains of Colorado...it's not true that a two stroke is less efficient than the four stroker...I generally don't chime in - this being the first time...and I didn't realize sooo many people were still 'Droit bonkers. Anyways, we've been married to Terex and 'Droit since the 60's...suppose I'll weigh in on some of these. To give you an idea...our Silver 92(8V92TT), in a '79 GMC General will get about 5mpg loaded to 95k gross...our Series 60 does about the same.

  • is it a 2 or 4 stroke ??

  • @unclewilly2 Detroits are 2 stroke, that's why they sound like they're doing twice the RPMs of a 4 stroke.

  • beautiful beautiful beautiful beautiful

  • BUZZIN' DOZEN!!!!!!!

  • Back in the med 80s a friend of mine his trucking company would order new mack cabovers with the V892 . them where the days

  • He's got no trailer lights...don't follow too close!

  • cool

  • Lucky ass driver!

  • I love the sound of that 12V71 engine. He roars hardcore just like his brothers the 6V71 and 8V71 engines.

  • love that sound !!!

  • Sweet ride!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more