"sampling something that millions of people will want to listen to all over the world is another thing."
It's still sampling, and the fact they make lots of money off other people's creativity still labels it as lame.
I'd rather make my own material and have only a few listeners, than make millions while ripping off other artists. It's called integrity, but apparently it's not worth shit anymore these days.
@MomoTheBellyDancer It's called Music, and it's an art. Are their any set boundaries in art? no. Do the people who originally composed the parts sampled by daft punk give permission for them to use their material? Yes. Why? because they're musicians, and they appreciate the freedom of creativity like I and many others do. So take it somewhere else because nobody agrees with your naive and stale views.
"It's called Music, and it's an art. Are their any set boundaries in art? no."
Yes, there are, and the most important one is: "Don't steal material from other people and sell it as your own." Plagiarism is still a huge no-no. If the guys from Daft Punk had ANY decency, they would give ALL of the money they earned with ripping off music to the original artists.
@lucpallot Seriously check out 'Since I Left You' by The Avalanches and then tell me they aren't musicians because they used 3,500 samples to create the album.
What I love about Daft Punk is that the samples they use do take on a new entity of their own, they give them a new life. Add to that, they also expose listeners like me to the original artists and discover classic gems I'd otherwise never have heard of. Crescendolls is my fave off Discovery and this song by the Imperials is also a gem.
Sampling isn't just taking full phrases of songs...people forget that you have people like Pete Rock and the late J Dilla taking snares and kicks and other instruments from songs to make new textures in their OWN songs.
I'm a musician. I play ten instruments, and familiar with about 6 more. and after working on an instrument in nearly every family, i have limited musical experience.
ive also tried mixing. I have to say what daft punk does is harder or equal to what it takes to make original music. So everyone shut up and when your mixing like them then come back.
A lot of people here have probably never realised that one of the fathers of daft punk had a very popular club in 1970's Paris, they were bought up around this music. It's know wonder really why they sampled it, were inspired by it, and have become extremely popular from it. Although sampling might seem a pretty simple idea, until you try it yourself, you'll never know how much work Daft Punk have done. and to the 'running out of ideas' comment, you have no idea what you're talking about.
@D3adGoon They don't need to though, they know that sample is good enough on it's own without anything actually having to be added to it other than upping the tempo, mastering the sound and giving it a bit of structure. The fact it's so popular proves this really. People always seem to feel deceived when they find out it's all been sampled because it's seems so simple to do. They're DJ's, that's what they do and if it's so simple we'd all be sampling songs and raking in millions.
@lucpallot I never said it's simple to do. I still just prefer more changes myself. If it's true that they sampled 'More Spell on You' for 'One More Time' (I know they deny it. But I've seen videos of guys editing that song getting an almost identical result), then I'm pretty impressed by that! It's a completely different song!
I am more aware since last time that it's part of the whole DJ thing to loop parts of songs and style it bit etc etc. so I guess within the context it's ok.
I do understand what your talking about, sampling is a difficult processes and daft punk are the experts at it. but sampling is overused to much in the music industry, just look at the pop songs, producers are reusing beats and tempos from there hits and using it on other song, listen to california gurls and tik tok, it like they don't want to make a new beat just reusing ones from a old songs. but that good thing about sampling is your really discover old school song for the sp.
@pspmerr Very true, most chart music today is soooo lazy that they drop a sample in because they want the catchy beat, without being accused of stealing it if they say it's a "sample" and a lot of it is pointless and they churn those records out every week! But, with artists like Daft Punk they discover the old music, and rework it, which takes a lot more talent! That is why the album was called "Discovery" it was jam packed full of old samples. Then they released "Discovered" with them on it :)
@lucpallot I have nothing against Daft Punk neither Sampling. Sampling takes work and time, but not as much as composing original material ! Least what Daft Punk could have done is give credits to the band/composer by putting his name on their CDs
@Jadguitare If you have a copy of Discovery on CD, you will notice in the pull-out album artwork where the lyrics are included, that each and every band has been credited per song. It is a legal requirement, and they would have gone through a sampling clearance process in order to release the album. If you don't think sampling takes as much time as coming up with your own material, then check out 'Since I Left You' by The Avalanches, an album assembled by 3500 vinyl samples. That's skill.
@lucpallot most of the idiots saying stuff like that are very young and or clueless and have no idea how big sampling or reconstructing is in the music world, it always has been, specially in hip hop and electronic music
@ErikVaughnDillinger Even The Beatles did, infact I think they were one of the first artists to use the technique. 'Yellow Submarine' - used sampled brass instruments.
@lucpallot exactly, i think daft punk uses the art of sampling in a fantastic way. Thanks to guys like them, Phats and Small, Felix da housecat, Junior Jack et al I have discovered so much lovely disco music and funk over the years, like this one!!!
Most of the songs on Discovery have samples from old songs and/or have a old school feel to it. They did this to introduce classic tunes to today audience that's why the album is called Discovery.
@MomoTheBellyDancer They didn't steal anything; they paid for the samples in the normal fashion. Also, as far as I know, Daft Punk never claimed to be "musicians".
@MomoTheBellyDancer You can argue that using samples is uncreative. Maybe you're right. But you claimed they stole the samples, and that was incorrect. They conducted themselves in a manner which supports the original artists. How many people have even heard of these tracks before Daft Punk sampled them? I bet there's a queue a mile long for who they choose to sample next.
@pspmerr disagree. that kind of sampling, "cutting and repeating a 8 bar part from a track just pitching it" is pure theft. Well done micro-sampling like Justice does is about creating new material from old unrecognizable audio samples.
@pspmerr not really. it's a way for another artist to give credit to someone to came before them, while simultaneously creating good music, which (usually) is significantly different from the original.
@pspmerr Everyone says "We're running out of ideas". They said it twenty years ago, and look at everything we've done since then. I doubt ideas will "run out" anytime soon. In fact, I think they're the one resource we will never be able to exhaust.
I think without these songs in past Daft Punk wouldn't be so popular hopefully both of the groups are really happy its like the past is helping out the future it kinda cool to see that too awesome :3
Ayy people if daft punk didn't sample then it wouldn't be French house. Stop bitching they're both excellent songs and both deserve credit equally. Some of u idiots think sampling is easy. To learn to sample
Like daft punk is truly hard.. Like ice said on other videos.... Sampling is an art
I hate the fact that people would assume "Oh Daft Punk are fucking gods ; they make so-so original music", which is slightly not true. Some artists/composers have inspirations or something to help them compose a song; okay so Daft Punk sampled a song; but they added their own touch to the song. And without those tracks, people would never knew original songs like these cease to exist. Positivity please.
@iLevys A lot of people forget the fact that, it's pretty hard to go out and find a really good sample like this. It takes talent to find a sample that will work.
People get mad at Daft Punk, but yet when a rap artist does it its perfectly fine?. Music was made to be spread around stop tripping. I'm pretty sure that the Imperials are glad that a whole different genre sampled their song, and yet pretty sure they got paid for it
"Stop bashing Daft Punk! This is what they do, they are DJs for Christ's sake! Both songs are absolutely fabulous."
Then stop counter-bashing.^^
Djs remix things, and do so creatively. But where others put content in another context through playing with it/extension, DP just looped the originals. Whereas the result is most likely called the "xyz remix" anywere else, Crescendolls ist not. This is not theft but simply disrespectful. Likewise, I have less respect for DP as inventive artists, now.
@sholto8 Daft Punk are geniuses to take a SAMPLE and make it into a song on its own, yes it can sound repetitive at times but its not fully exactly as the same. you try doing what they do.
In all of music history from the Dark Ages of Bach and way later.. there's been melodies which has been rearranged to meet the croud and those times the church principles met real music...
wardoggwyllgi and Cubansito already said it... Where it some band or composer gets the blame for these melodies... it's of course the past to be sorry for..
Because if there wasn't classic music or the ancestor meddling with his stick as a musical instrument. Getting the picture? There wont be any music!!!
Oh and one more thing, all you little Daft Punk fan bitches, this is not a Daft Punk song. Get the fuck over yourselves, and get the fuck out. This is a song about real music, real creativity, and real showmanship, not some punk asses with a damn turntable and a sampling machine.
its so true the reason you had to learn this song from daft punk is because it was another okay song that was just got forgotten by any one who wasn't a dj or born before 1970
That's bullshit. I'm only 30, but I'm a musician and a huge huge Motown, R&B, Funk, and Soul fan. I didn't know who daft punk was till about 5 years ago. People who know good music and don't depend on the radio to tell them what the "hits" are, know who Anthony and the Imperials are just fine thank you, and we don't need "DJs" who don't the ability to create their own music to steal someone else' shit to get famous.
And we wonder why the US is bankrupt. Quit fucking stealing.
wow so DJ's are all theives and the radio is what tells people what is good music? really? a dying form of media. well by that logic all artists indescriminant of genre, instrument, or musical abilty are thieves. every one from hendrix to anyone who's ever been on american idol symply because at some point most artists great or not use, or as you put it "steal" anothers work. and if you listed motown without thinking of philly first... your as ungifted as you think we are. TROLL.
Well with your system of logic, it's no surprise that your entire paragraph is irrelevant and not at all what I said. First of all, radios don't "tell people what's good music". Secondly, when they play an artist, they give the name of who it is. They don't say, this is "Paradise City" by your favorite DJ (when in reality it's Gun's & Roses).
Hendrix didnt steal the recordings of other artists. He played his own music, and paid royalties to those whose songs he used, idiot.
@JurisArcane dude you probably come here simply to argue when you get a inbox notice. shut the fuck up. no one wants to be bothered with your dumbass points of view. go jack off or something, just leave us alone.
Yeah, you're right brotha, I am guilty of responding to a comment when someone posts.
Let me ask you a question though genius, if my opinion is so worthless, and I'm such a waste of time, and the time spent to say what I say, would be better spent jacking off, and I should just "leave you all alone"....
Why the hell did you just post a comment to me?
You didn't graduate with the top percent of the class did you.
As a Daft Punk fan, I gotta say that the didn't really sample this song as creatively as they usually do with others. Both Cresendolls and this song sound wonderful though.
Respect to the two bands. Without Crecendolls, I wouldn't have known this song and this is actually a great song of its kind too. Stop the hate and let's just appreciate the songs :D
Plus, they don't ruin the music like some samplers. The Whatcha Say song by Jason derulo(something like that) was disrespectful towards the original song Hide and Seek. It's because the original song is about the holocaust and Jason took it and twisted it into a song about divorce.
i lyk daft punk cuz they make real music its lyk old music thats awesome and make it new again. If only all the crap on the radio nd tv could study from older music nd tv and everything cuz older music pwns all the crap today. Both can you imagine and crescendolls are amazing songs.
@TheNinety99 i'm glad you discovered Little Anthony! They are great (obviously). I love both groups so much. I'm a fan of just good music in general, no matter what the genre :D
i thnik Daft Punk have totally homaged this tune by sampling it, i mean this is said in the greatest respect but how many people would know this song now if cresendolls had never sampled it. I love this song thanks to DP
daft punk are DJ´s and its normal than the DJ s take a make better old rithyms so the people than says they are stealing songs, i say to they suck a coock,and a real stealer of songs are the jonas gay group of brothers,or i usually nick them, the Dick-Suckers...
I mean Daft Punk sampled it, but the lyrics are kind of a rip off of John Lennon's Imagine. If you think about it all these sounds had been made before this song in 1977. If you're really going to try to bash on people for sampling older works you're going to end up tracing everything back to chants written by monks in total isolation in the 700's AD
Nah ya know what fuck that shit. Daft Punk is a bunch of a vampire ripoffs that steal the music of real artists and play it as if it's their own and make money off it. They are every thing that's wrong with music, and for that matter, are why the real music is disappearing beneath the cloud of shit they put out on cds today.
How would you feel if someone took your life's work, mutilated it and sold it as though it were theirs. Shit would make you want to kill someone.
@JurisArcane my problem is that they sneakily release what are technically remixes as new "songs" and give it a whole new name. It feels like DP doesn't really want people to know exactly how much of a chunk they are breaking of of these orginals. They credit the artists in tiny liner notes where you never think to look...you know, just enough to acknowledge it. Atleast the original House Djs in the 80s were respectful enough to call their dubs and remixes exactly what they were.
Further more, these white boy wanna-be "musicians" are taking the music of the black community, from a period when black people weren't even allowed to eat in the same restaurant as white people, for fuck's sake (and yes I'm white).
I don't wanna hear another god damn thing about Daft Punk. I wanna listen to the real music and not think about the leeches, thank you very much.
@JurisArcane Daft Punk is my favorite artist, as well as a favorite for many others so I'd appreciate it if you'd stop bashing them. If you don't like them, that's okay because we're all entitled to our own opinions, but don't sit here typing away at how "daft punk this, daft punk that." They have the ability to create a great song simply out of the words "Around the World" RESPECT.
This isn't Daft Punk's song playing, it's Lil Anthony and the Imperials. If you're a "huge" Daft Punk fan, go suck their asses in a channel or song that's Daft Punk. I "will" bash Daft Punk as long as those no talent having ass-clown thieves continue to steal samples and call it their own. Truth is greater than "respect". Consider yourself a smarter person today.
@JurisArcane I never said it was Daft Punk's song, please re-read my comment thoroughly. And while you're at it get a life, everyone is entitled to their opinion. If they're so horrible then why are you still talking about them?
@JurisArcane I never said it was Daft Punk's song, before you try to lecture me, please read the comment thoroughly. I simply asked for you to shut the hell up and respect everyone's opinion, but it seems that you really aren't open to listening to what I have to say. So I bid you good day.
...I never said you said it was daft Punk's song. Are you on drugs? Furthermore, you're asking me to shut the hell up, but yet you're trying to get me to respect "everyone's" opinion? LoL. Sounds like the only opinion you respect is the one that agrees with you.
Good day indeed. Go take a few critical thinking classes or something brotha, because your comprehension of the english language and analytical reading abilities are probably causing you lots of problems in life.
I am another who only know about this via crescendolls by daft punk. No wonder daft punk sound so funky when they are using stuff from this era! respect the the original creators for this nice tune, and people who dislike Daft Punk for bringing this great tune up to date are missing the point!
@lucpallot
"sampling something that millions of people will want to listen to all over the world is another thing."
It's still sampling, and the fact they make lots of money off other people's creativity still labels it as lame.
I'd rather make my own material and have only a few listeners, than make millions while ripping off other artists. It's called integrity, but apparently it's not worth shit anymore these days.
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 week ago
@MomoTheBellyDancer It's called Music, and it's an art. Are their any set boundaries in art? no. Do the people who originally composed the parts sampled by daft punk give permission for them to use their material? Yes. Why? because they're musicians, and they appreciate the freedom of creativity like I and many others do. So take it somewhere else because nobody agrees with your naive and stale views.
lucpallot 1 week ago
@lucpallot
"It's called Music, and it's an art. Are their any set boundaries in art? no."
Yes, there are, and the most important one is: "Don't steal material from other people and sell it as your own." Plagiarism is still a huge no-no. If the guys from Daft Punk had ANY decency, they would give ALL of the money they earned with ripping off music to the original artists.
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 week ago
@MomoTheBellyDancer Shit me you're thick
lucpallot 1 week ago
@lucpallot
"Shit me you're thick"
Blow me.
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 week ago
@MomoTheBellyDancer No thanks, I don't swing that way
lucpallot 1 week ago
Comment removed
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 week ago
@lucpallot Seriously check out 'Since I Left You' by The Avalanches and then tell me they aren't musicians because they used 3,500 samples to create the album.
lucpallot 1 week ago
What I love about Daft Punk is that the samples they use do take on a new entity of their own, they give them a new life. Add to that, they also expose listeners like me to the original artists and discover classic gems I'd otherwise never have heard of. Crescendolls is my fave off Discovery and this song by the Imperials is also a gem.
vivmex78 1 month ago
Hey, at least Daft Punk doesn't ruin the songs they sample.
LeonimuZ 1 month ago 4
I THINK DAFT PUNK TAKE A GOOD SONG TO MAKE A GREAT SONG
CAN YOU IMAGINE =CRESCENDOLLS
invader6246675 1 month ago
I must say, when comparing the two versions, I find it hard to decide which is better. They are both brilliant.
Quacker000 1 month ago
This is such a wonderful song! Thank you Daft Punk for getting me to know this!
superads91 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAFT PUNK !!!!
invader6246675 3 months ago
DAFT PUNK !!!!
invader6246675 3 months ago 2
For years I thought Daft Punk were awesome for creating Crescendolls, I guess they aren't. It's a shame they get all the credit.
666hades666 4 months ago
Daft Punk are masters of sampling.
MinamuTV 4 months ago 4
Thumbs up if you knew this before Daft punk?
26bobbyjack62 5 months ago
@26bobbyjack62 So sad how you get no thumbs up lol
buraiallanstarforce 2 months ago
Sampling isn't just taking full phrases of songs...people forget that you have people like Pete Rock and the late J Dilla taking snares and kicks and other instruments from songs to make new textures in their OWN songs.
SMH It's not always so easy!
Moog167 6 months ago
@thelennna No fuck yourself because you know that i'm rite
coolboy56574 7 months ago
@thelennna jackass if it weren't for these guys daft punk would've never got this song.
coolboy56574 7 months ago
I love the sample daft punk did from this son. Everybody aaawwww! Heeeeyy! :)
giggafett09 7 months ago
@TheCHIDOVATO yep Crescendoll, and those Dj done a good work to revive the music.
I'm born in 90' and never know "old sound" 's so good like that.
Thank DP for they good "gou^t" musique...
topbadgun 7 months ago
I'm a musician. I play ten instruments, and familiar with about 6 more. and after working on an instrument in nearly every family, i have limited musical experience.
ive also tried mixing. I have to say what daft punk does is harder or equal to what it takes to make original music. So everyone shut up and when your mixing like them then come back.
dXAriseXb 7 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice job on the video looks good. When you have time come visit my channel!
bestpreworkout 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice job on the video looks good. When you have time come visit my channel!
TheNitricOxide 8 months ago
Thumbs up if you only came here for the sampling :D
The12an1 8 months ago
1:50 is where the sample was taken.
Rollabobin 9 months ago
Crescendolls?! (lol)
niaroxable 9 months ago
Fuck you guys, i still love my mom more!
ArvoDes 10 months ago
01:50 yallll
hydr0p0nic 11 months ago
Take old song and make even awesomer? Damn I'm all for it
Pringlulz 11 months ago
A lot of people here have probably never realised that one of the fathers of daft punk had a very popular club in 1970's Paris, they were bought up around this music. It's know wonder really why they sampled it, were inspired by it, and have become extremely popular from it. Although sampling might seem a pretty simple idea, until you try it yourself, you'll never know how much work Daft Punk have done. and to the 'running out of ideas' comment, you have no idea what you're talking about.
lucpallot 1 year ago 82
@lucpallot Thank you for that. Now I have a rebuttal for all the idiots.
dropdadime 11 months ago
@lucpallot I think sampling to a point is ok. But what I'm shocked by is that Daft Punk didn't seem to COMPOSE anything themselves to go with it.
D3adGoon 11 months ago
@D3adGoon They don't need to though, they know that sample is good enough on it's own without anything actually having to be added to it other than upping the tempo, mastering the sound and giving it a bit of structure. The fact it's so popular proves this really. People always seem to feel deceived when they find out it's all been sampled because it's seems so simple to do. They're DJ's, that's what they do and if it's so simple we'd all be sampling songs and raking in millions.
lucpallot 11 months ago
@lucpallot I never said it's simple to do. I still just prefer more changes myself. If it's true that they sampled 'More Spell on You' for 'One More Time' (I know they deny it. But I've seen videos of guys editing that song getting an almost identical result), then I'm pretty impressed by that! It's a completely different song!
I am more aware since last time that it's part of the whole DJ thing to loop parts of songs and style it bit etc etc. so I guess within the context it's ok.
D3adGoon 11 months ago
@lucpallot
I do understand what your talking about, sampling is a difficult processes and daft punk are the experts at it. but sampling is overused to much in the music industry, just look at the pop songs, producers are reusing beats and tempos from there hits and using it on other song, listen to california gurls and tik tok, it like they don't want to make a new beat just reusing ones from a old songs. but that good thing about sampling is your really discover old school song for the sp.
pspmerr 9 months ago 16
@pspmerr Very true, most chart music today is soooo lazy that they drop a sample in because they want the catchy beat, without being accused of stealing it if they say it's a "sample" and a lot of it is pointless and they churn those records out every week! But, with artists like Daft Punk they discover the old music, and rework it, which takes a lot more talent! That is why the album was called "Discovery" it was jam packed full of old samples. Then they released "Discovered" with them on it :)
pumpkill 5 months ago
@lucpallot I have nothing against Daft Punk neither Sampling. Sampling takes work and time, but not as much as composing original material ! Least what Daft Punk could have done is give credits to the band/composer by putting his name on their CDs
Jadguitare 8 months ago in playlist Sampled Old Tunes
@Jadguitare If you have a copy of Discovery on CD, you will notice in the pull-out album artwork where the lyrics are included, that each and every band has been credited per song. It is a legal requirement, and they would have gone through a sampling clearance process in order to release the album. If you don't think sampling takes as much time as coming up with your own material, then check out 'Since I Left You' by The Avalanches, an album assembled by 3500 vinyl samples. That's skill.
lucpallot 8 months ago 2
@lucpallot most of the idiots saying stuff like that are very young and or clueless and have no idea how big sampling or reconstructing is in the music world, it always has been, specially in hip hop and electronic music
ErikVaughnDillinger 8 months ago
@ErikVaughnDillinger Even The Beatles did, infact I think they were one of the first artists to use the technique. 'Yellow Submarine' - used sampled brass instruments.
lucpallot 8 months ago
@lucpallot exactly
ErikVaughnDillinger 8 months ago
C'mon, sampling is very easy... Hard is to play!
HRaudioBrasil 7 months ago
@lucpallot exactly, i think daft punk uses the art of sampling in a fantastic way. Thanks to guys like them, Phats and Small, Felix da housecat, Junior Jack et al I have discovered so much lovely disco music and funk over the years, like this one!!!
discomadame 5 months ago
@lucpallot 100% true
Most of the songs on Discovery have samples from old songs and/or have a old school feel to it. They did this to introduce classic tunes to today audience that's why the album is called Discovery.
MrBlackman6996 4 months ago 2
@lucpallot how did you found this info
TheStraatjutter 3 months ago
@lucpallot
"It's know wonder really why they sampled it, were inspired by it, and have become extremely popular from it"
The thing is: they stole other people's music without giving them credit.
"sampling might seem a pretty simple idea, until you try it yourself"
Na. It's actually VERY simple. I can do it, and so can many others. But playing your own stuff over stolen songs does not make you a musician.
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 month ago
@MomoTheBellyDancer They didn't steal anything; they paid for the samples in the normal fashion. Also, as far as I know, Daft Punk never claimed to be "musicians".
solo1y 1 month ago
@solo1y
"they paid for the samples in the normal fashion."
Even if they did, it's still uncreative as all hell. And they still don't credit the original musicians.
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 month ago
@MomoTheBellyDancer THEY WROTE IT ON THE RECORD FOOL DON'T BE STUPID!
MrCoolSwett 1 month ago
@MomoTheBellyDancer You can argue that using samples is uncreative. Maybe you're right. But you claimed they stole the samples, and that was incorrect. They conducted themselves in a manner which supports the original artists. How many people have even heard of these tracks before Daft Punk sampled them? I bet there's a queue a mile long for who they choose to sample next.
solo1y 1 month ago
daft punk wasn't the only to sample this/use it. Look up this song but the Database re-edit. Still sounds the same like crescendolls tho :P
redsxncubs23 1 year ago
lol @ 'sampling becoming the norm in music'
darkshines0 1 year ago 8
@darkshines0
AKA '' we are running out if ideas''
pspmerr 1 year ago 18
@pspmerr There are no new notes.
nilbud 11 months ago
@pspmerr disagree. that kind of sampling, "cutting and repeating a 8 bar part from a track just pitching it" is pure theft. Well done micro-sampling like Justice does is about creating new material from old unrecognizable audio samples.
hubertreeves3 10 months ago
@pspmerr not really. it's a way for another artist to give credit to someone to came before them, while simultaneously creating good music, which (usually) is significantly different from the original.
Hankhankhank2 9 months ago
@pspmerr Everyone says "We're running out of ideas". They said it twenty years ago, and look at everything we've done since then. I doubt ideas will "run out" anytime soon. In fact, I think they're the one resource we will never be able to exhaust.
Ayelis 7 months ago
@pspmerr Not at all.
pbpman1 1 month ago
Any you noobs even understand that sampling isn't stealing? It's the basis for most dance music
kly45 1 year ago
I think without these songs in past Daft Punk wouldn't be so popular hopefully both of the groups are really happy its like the past is helping out the future it kinda cool to see that too awesome :3
Aki65 1 year ago
Ayy people if daft punk didn't sample then it wouldn't be French house. Stop bitching they're both excellent songs and both deserve credit equally. Some of u idiots think sampling is easy. To learn to sample
Like daft punk is truly hard.. Like ice said on other videos.... Sampling is an art
iCharleyStudios 1 year ago
People are acting like House Music has never been based on sampling before Daft Punk.
ReginaldMaulding 1 year ago
I hate the fact that people would assume "Oh Daft Punk are fucking gods ; they make so-so original music", which is slightly not true. Some artists/composers have inspirations or something to help them compose a song; okay so Daft Punk sampled a song; but they added their own touch to the song. And without those tracks, people would never knew original songs like these cease to exist. Positivity please.
iLevys 1 year ago
@iLevys A lot of people forget the fact that, it's pretty hard to go out and find a really good sample like this. It takes talent to find a sample that will work.
kly45 1 year ago
This justifies why I hate crecendolls so much, its just the intro of this song looped for 10 minutes
tcw295 1 year ago
People get mad at Daft Punk, but yet when a rap artist does it its perfectly fine?. Music was made to be spread around stop tripping. I'm pretty sure that the Imperials are glad that a whole different genre sampled their song, and yet pretty sure they got paid for it
Jpat5991 1 year ago
Daft Punk SAMPLES???...They lose a few points in my book...I still like them but I'm sick of sampling becoming the norm in music!!!
Ltron9 1 year ago
@Ltron9 Theres no more originality. Peace
RUSTB18C1 1 year ago
@Ltron9
They are DJ's...thats kinda what they do.... :/
thepacmanman 1 year ago
@Ltron9 ummmm they are dj's........ dont go hating on producers aswell who create their own music
nick20200 1 year ago
HEY! Everybody y'all. :D
Such a funky song. I can 'dig' it.
plinianguy 1 year ago
juris is angry that no one beleves his "i'm a 33 year old black dude act".
wardoggwyllgi 1 year ago
My friend thinks after the "HEY!" is a "WAHO!!!" so i showed him this, and turned up the cresendolls
Jamstrummer 1 year ago
Fuck! :(
jackodrums 1 year ago
I like both this song and Crescendolls equally! :D
accountmaniac 1 year ago
1:54
Love'n it... Crescendolls... LOL!
JEMMotorsports 1 year ago 3
"Stop bashing Daft Punk! This is what they do, they are DJs for Christ's sake! Both songs are absolutely fabulous."
Then stop counter-bashing.^^
Djs remix things, and do so creatively. But where others put content in another context through playing with it/extension, DP just looped the originals. Whereas the result is most likely called the "xyz remix" anywere else, Crescendolls ist not. This is not theft but simply disrespectful. Likewise, I have less respect for DP as inventive artists, now.
sholto8 1 year ago
@sholto8 Daft Punk are geniuses to take a SAMPLE and make it into a song on its own, yes it can sound repetitive at times but its not fully exactly as the same. you try doing what they do.
rdogsmrpink 1 year ago
In all of music history from the Dark Ages of Bach and way later.. there's been melodies which has been rearranged to meet the croud and those times the church principles met real music...
wardoggwyllgi and Cubansito already said it... Where it some band or composer gets the blame for these melodies... it's of course the past to be sorry for..
Because if there wasn't classic music or the ancestor meddling with his stick as a musical instrument. Getting the picture? There wont be any music!!!
mana82m 1 year ago
Oh and one more thing, all you little Daft Punk fan bitches, this is not a Daft Punk song. Get the fuck over yourselves, and get the fuck out. This is a song about real music, real creativity, and real showmanship, not some punk asses with a damn turntable and a sampling machine.
JurisArcane 1 year ago
I still love Daft Punk (: and this group is awsome too
sexwithoutanimals 1 year ago
Daft Punk adds in their own parts to the song too. Plus they pay for the samples.
sk904 1 year ago 3
Daft Punk are DeeJays, and we all know what DeeJays do, so please, shut up.
Zlixmix 1 year ago
its so true the reason you had to learn this song from daft punk is because it was another okay song that was just got forgotten by any one who wasn't a dj or born before 1970
wardoggwyllgi 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@wardoggwyllgi
That's bullshit. I'm only 30, but I'm a musician and a huge huge Motown, R&B, Funk, and Soul fan. I didn't know who daft punk was till about 5 years ago. People who know good music and don't depend on the radio to tell them what the "hits" are, know who Anthony and the Imperials are just fine thank you, and we don't need "DJs" who don't the ability to create their own music to steal someone else' shit to get famous.
And we wonder why the US is bankrupt. Quit fucking stealing.
JurisArcane 1 year ago
@JurisArcane
wow so DJ's are all theives and the radio is what tells people what is good music? really? a dying form of media. well by that logic all artists indescriminant of genre, instrument, or musical abilty are thieves. every one from hendrix to anyone who's ever been on american idol symply because at some point most artists great or not use, or as you put it "steal" anothers work. and if you listed motown without thinking of philly first... your as ungifted as you think we are. TROLL.
wardoggwyllgi 1 year ago
@wardoggwyllgi
Well with your system of logic, it's no surprise that your entire paragraph is irrelevant and not at all what I said. First of all, radios don't "tell people what's good music". Secondly, when they play an artist, they give the name of who it is. They don't say, this is "Paradise City" by your favorite DJ (when in reality it's Gun's & Roses).
Hendrix didnt steal the recordings of other artists. He played his own music, and paid royalties to those whose songs he used, idiot.
JurisArcane 1 year ago
@JurisArcane dude you probably come here simply to argue when you get a inbox notice. shut the fuck up. no one wants to be bothered with your dumbass points of view. go jack off or something, just leave us alone.
wardoggwyllgi 1 year ago
@wardoggwyllgi
Yeah, you're right brotha, I am guilty of responding to a comment when someone posts.
Let me ask you a question though genius, if my opinion is so worthless, and I'm such a waste of time, and the time spent to say what I say, would be better spent jacking off, and I should just "leave you all alone"....
Why the hell did you just post a comment to me?
You didn't graduate with the top percent of the class did you.
JurisArcane 1 year ago
omg i dont know whats more awesum dp or them
empv2 1 year ago
@empv2 daft punk
kingkerwick 1 year ago
a 50s song that looks like a 70s song? sold to me!
opedroefeio 1 year ago 53
@opedroefeio This track is obviously not from the 50s. I would guess it was recorded around 1976...anyone know the date?
funkmike 1 year ago
@funkmike One year off, '77 in fact :] The group first started playing in the 50's, but they did this in 1977. Gotta love it huh?
RazyKrandomGuy 1 year ago
This Was Release In 1977@opedroefeio
ProducerMD 4 months ago
daft punk iso el remix de esta canción ok en el álbum sale los créditos originales
lois181818 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
does this sound like cressendolls?
rosemrie721 1 year ago
As a Daft Punk fan, I gotta say that the didn't really sample this song as creatively as they usually do with others. Both Cresendolls and this song sound wonderful though.
FunkyskunkTV 1 year ago 2
Not to say anything, but daft punk samples alot of black people (coming from a black person)
dgrizzlefyed 1 year ago
@dgrizzlefyed I think they're just interested in combing disco with electronica...and disco was predominantly a black industry i think
pixelated111 1 year ago
@dgrizzlefyed nowonder i (a black person0 like daft punk lmao
ojibbwa 1 year ago
'HEEEEEY' 'WHOOOO'!! haha this was meant to be!
iguanamarie 1 year ago
Weird..it sounds like this group would have sampled Daft Punk haha I know I feel this way cuz I heard Daft Punk's version first.
whatifgrrl64 1 year ago
OMG ESTO ES IGUAL QUE LA canción de DAFT6 PUNK CIELOS
delnovo123 1 year ago
all the lonely people of beatles have the same melody and THEY copy !daft punk just remixe that !
leginuss22 1 year ago
Respect to the two bands. Without Crecendolls, I wouldn't have known this song and this is actually a great song of its kind too. Stop the hate and let's just appreciate the songs :D
KrayZieAsSPiNoy 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
TheJzTumult 1 year ago
Daft Punk have golden ears if they sampled this beauty.
rockisheaven 1 year ago 4
@rockisheaven one has golden ears, the other's is silver :P
PhDMegaManX 1 year ago
No, i can not imagine
Anthonyk312 1 year ago
Daft Punk does great music and are great Dj's. This song is also amazing!
DaftMeow 1 year ago
:OOO Crescendolls :DDDD
Well, close enough
DaftxMary 1 year ago
You have to admit though, whilst they do sample, they do it very gracefully.
scaryfishdude 1 year ago
Damn I cant help but move to this song
trogdorrules 1 year ago
i like music from all ages but i definitelly stay with DP they rule, true Jesus' of music
DaftPunketa 1 year ago
daft punks pwn more!
reallink2000 1 year ago
@reallink2000 These guys are too groovy.
Turtov 1 year ago
Daft Punk ownz this version! Their version rules!
LifeRunner4000 1 year ago
I never would have known about this if not for "Crescendolls".
zerosvc2 1 year ago 2
Plus, they don't ruin the music like some samplers. The Whatcha Say song by Jason derulo(something like that) was disrespectful towards the original song Hide and Seek. It's because the original song is about the holocaust and Jason took it and twisted it into a song about divorce.
ZharekRaldeesh 1 year ago
first time they say can you imagine it sounds like rocky when he is running xD
deki564 1 year ago
@deki564 Gonna fly nooooow! Yeah, it is somewhat similar.
DemonPorkRAWR 1 year ago
Totally Rocking My Fibula!
obiohakcn 1 year ago
I didn't know Daft Punk had a taste in old music
I mean Daft Punk coincidentally sampled some tunes of old songs
openyershat 1 year ago
this song is not on that album
whatupbroooo 1 year ago
i lyk daft punk cuz they make real music its lyk old music thats awesome and make it new again. If only all the crap on the radio nd tv could study from older music nd tv and everything cuz older music pwns all the crap today. Both can you imagine and crescendolls are amazing songs.
iCharleyStudios 1 year ago
@iCharleyStudios you're totally right the old musics pwn big part of today crap :P
batutinha321 1 year ago 2
1977
F1Z1Kas 1 year ago
Lol they stole this, THIS WAS CREATED BY DAFT PUNK YOU RETARDS !!!
(don't mind me, I'm just trolling.)
kalyptus 1 year ago 31
@kalyptus L M F A O
diddlybop 1 year ago
love this song, daft punk version though. lol. they're still cool but. :D
joely0194 2 years ago
Without Daft Punk I would NEVER know these guys, let alone listen to their music.
Bravo to both groups!
TheNinety99 2 years ago 193
Same for me, and also " Discovered: A Collection of Daft Punk Samples". Do you know "Philadelphia Roots" by Soul Jazz Records? (Message from France.)
decernoify 2 years ago
@TheNinety99 i'm glad you discovered Little Anthony! They are great (obviously). I love both groups so much. I'm a fan of just good music in general, no matter what the genre :D
calienteuno 1 year ago
@TheNinety99 That's the perk that comes with letting an artist sample your music. You get some publicity!
ninjamaster97 1 year ago
@TheNinety99 And you still wont be listening to them. I'd put money on that.
robotsongs 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anthony and the imperials ripped this song from daft punk imo.
uchiacon 2 years ago
to the person that says this sounds dum, u are an imbecile.
SludgeSteppa 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
daft punk sounds better maybe because im not in 2 oldies but dis sound dumb
mssldy 2 years ago
Cool.
Aaronator19842009 2 years ago 2
i thnik Daft Punk have totally homaged this tune by sampling it, i mean this is said in the greatest respect but how many people would know this song now if cresendolls had never sampled it. I love this song thanks to DP
fagAshLil1234 2 years ago 14
ya thats wat im saying! :D
brennan6464 2 years ago
daft punk are DJ´s and its normal than the DJ s take a make better old rithyms so the people than says they are stealing songs, i say to they suck a coock,and a real stealer of songs are the jonas gay group of brothers,or i usually nick them, the Dick-Suckers...
isaac4lego 2 years ago 12
i argee
PLZKILL 2 years ago
those are called producers, not DJs
kinghandles718 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
rofl shows that all music makes steal their songs XDXD
Misha070 2 years ago
C'mon Daft Punk Samp'd a tiny part right at the start and built up on that. Not like Robot rock where they just looped a 5 second snip for 3 minutes.
GREGMAX111 2 years ago 26
@GREGMAX111 Robot Rock is still amazing.
fmlycrzyvid95 1 year ago
I mean Daft Punk sampled it, but the lyrics are kind of a rip off of John Lennon's Imagine. If you think about it all these sounds had been made before this song in 1977. If you're really going to try to bash on people for sampling older works you're going to end up tracing everything back to chants written by monks in total isolation in the 700's AD
masta8877 2 years ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
well said bro
blackdragonB9Y0 2 years ago
I was wondering when someone would upload this song. I thought I'd have to go buy it.
shadowseraph78 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Justin Timberlake - Lovestoned?
BryanMundy 2 years ago
LOL
MonkeyPumpkinTV 2 years ago
Awesome song is awesome.
YamashitaTsubasa 2 years ago
I love this beat!
So damn funky.. and yes I stumbled upon this through DP samples..
DelJunya 2 years ago 6
In the daft punk version all you can hear is Hey! en yow, but in this version you can hear what it really is which is Hey! get your boogy on.
Anthonyk312 2 years ago
again original is 10x better
MiniScalope 2 years ago
Stop bashing Daft Punk! This is what they do, they are DJs for Christ's sake! Both songs are absolutely fabulous.
stormredux 2 years ago 138
@stormredux but daft punk is the best of those...
aarg4ingennavnfunker 1 year ago
@stormredux
Nah ya know what fuck that shit. Daft Punk is a bunch of a vampire ripoffs that steal the music of real artists and play it as if it's their own and make money off it. They are every thing that's wrong with music, and for that matter, are why the real music is disappearing beneath the cloud of shit they put out on cds today.
How would you feel if someone took your life's work, mutilated it and sold it as though it were theirs. Shit would make you want to kill someone.
JurisArcane 1 year ago
@JurisArcane my problem is that they sneakily release what are technically remixes as new "songs" and give it a whole new name. It feels like DP doesn't really want people to know exactly how much of a chunk they are breaking of of these orginals. They credit the artists in tiny liner notes where you never think to look...you know, just enough to acknowledge it. Atleast the original House Djs in the 80s were respectful enough to call their dubs and remixes exactly what they were.
Xozona 1 year ago
@Xozona
Exactly.
JurisArcane 1 year ago
@stormredux
Further more, these white boy wanna-be "musicians" are taking the music of the black community, from a period when black people weren't even allowed to eat in the same restaurant as white people, for fuck's sake (and yes I'm white).
I don't wanna hear another god damn thing about Daft Punk. I wanna listen to the real music and not think about the leeches, thank you very much.
JurisArcane 1 year ago
@JurisArcane Daft Punk is my favorite artist, as well as a favorite for many others so I'd appreciate it if you'd stop bashing them. If you don't like them, that's okay because we're all entitled to our own opinions, but don't sit here typing away at how "daft punk this, daft punk that." They have the ability to create a great song simply out of the words "Around the World" RESPECT.
Cubansito 1 year ago
@Cubansito
This isn't Daft Punk's song playing, it's Lil Anthony and the Imperials. If you're a "huge" Daft Punk fan, go suck their asses in a channel or song that's Daft Punk. I "will" bash Daft Punk as long as those no talent having ass-clown thieves continue to steal samples and call it their own. Truth is greater than "respect". Consider yourself a smarter person today.
JurisArcane 1 year ago
@JurisArcane I never said it was Daft Punk's song, please re-read my comment thoroughly. And while you're at it get a life, everyone is entitled to their opinion. If they're so horrible then why are you still talking about them?
Cubansito 1 year ago
@JurisArcane I never said it was Daft Punk's song, before you try to lecture me, please read the comment thoroughly. I simply asked for you to shut the hell up and respect everyone's opinion, but it seems that you really aren't open to listening to what I have to say. So I bid you good day.
Cubansito 1 year ago
@Cubansito
...I never said you said it was daft Punk's song. Are you on drugs? Furthermore, you're asking me to shut the hell up, but yet you're trying to get me to respect "everyone's" opinion? LoL. Sounds like the only opinion you respect is the one that agrees with you.
Good day indeed. Go take a few critical thinking classes or something brotha, because your comprehension of the english language and analytical reading abilities are probably causing you lots of problems in life.
JurisArcane 1 year ago
I am another who only know about this via crescendolls by daft punk. No wonder daft punk sound so funky when they are using stuff from this era! respect the the original creators for this nice tune, and people who dislike Daft Punk for bringing this great tune up to date are missing the point!
Ashkinda 2 years ago 6
yep i only found this out and the others from daft punk songs lol
i agree with you on the second part to
BelizeHunni 2 years ago
Great Song
Skullzak69 2 years ago
Yeah but some people have a point, without 'Crescendolls' this video probably wouldnt have as many views. Both versions are good