Fuel cells are too expensive. That car will retail over 6 figures. Plus there isn't enough precious metals to make the fuel cells for everyone in the world to have one. The better solution is to use standard internal combustion engines running hydrogen instead of gasoline.
This man is one of the biggest idiots I have ever had the displeasure of watching in the media.
His inane commentary and constant ridicule of anyone pushing for smarter energy ruined what could have been a great expose on really ground-breaking technology.
In the newly released budget, the U.S. Department of Energy cuts $100 million from the hydrogen fuel cell program in fiscal year 2010 and transforms its name to "fuel cell technologies." Hydrogen, of course, is just the fuel of a fuel cell—a device that recombines hydrogen and oxygen to produce water and electrical current. Still, the name change distances the Obama administration from the "hydrogen economy" goals of their predecessors.
Ok, let me get this straight. We developed a technology that emits water vapor. Ending our dependence Islamic oil. and our president Ended this programs. Wow, aren't you glad he's in office.
@coliwood you've haven't got it straight. there is still funding for the basic research that is still needed. The car company cut back themselves when they almost went bankrupt. Those fuel cells are still very expensive, makes the Volt or the Tesla look as cheap as bicycle. The primary source of hydrogen is petrochemical so it wouldn't end your dependence on Islamic oil.
@kbs1138 I understand that but, that technology would greatly reduce our oil dependence, so much so, we would have to have Islamic oil. I live in detroit and I am a member of UAW local 155. GM was fine, the bailout was the company could meet it's union obligations. In essence, it was the UAW that was bailed out.
and to think by now these things could have been on the road already instead of the epic fail volt, one thing i haven heard is how much it will cost per "charge" (40 miles) it will add to our already expensive electric bills.
I have been screaming for hydrogen cars for thirty years and all I have ever heard is " Hey dummy have you never seen the Hindenbergh crash?" With that kind of forward thinking we would never have flown in airplanes. After they crash you know.
Typical, if it could truly save the environment the progressives don't want it. Just goes to show the progressives only are using the environmentalists as a distraction in order to gain more power over the people.
@xtaxplayer two things, large scale affordable hydrogen production currently has to come from petroleum based resources. No guarantee that sunlight based production of Hydrogen will ever make sense. Second, switching from an oil infrastructure to a hydrogen infrastructure would require government involvement on a huge scale. If you want power to the people now, think biodiesal and electric.
How does hydrogen production have to come from petroleum based energy? It's called nuclear power... remember that? Before the hippie freaks destroyed that plan too? As for changing infrastructure, there was already a private sector deal with Shell to outfit gas stations with hydrogen pumps.
Bio diesel is inefficient, stresses land fertility, eats into food production, uses millions of acres of land, and still isn't emission free. Also, it has had MASSIVE government involvement.
@N37BU6 Most hydrogen is produced by breaking down natural gas into hydrogen and carbon dioxide. if you are suggesting that we use electricity from nuclear power plants to create hydrogen, that's hugely inefficient and would creates lots of nuclear waste, lots of strip mining. Thorium based reactors would certainly be an alternative if they can get support, but it's still much more efficient to use the electricity directly. Next generation biodiesel does not have the drawbacks you mention.
@kbs1138 1) Large scale Hydrogen could be phased in privately. 2) I recycle Cooking oil to diesel now and I have a hydrogen generator on my only gas vehicle. It went from 18 miles per gallon to 33. Electric is a non-option to expensive on both ends.
@xtaxplayer private phase-in would require it be cheaper than current technology, it's not and not likely to be for the foreseeable future. High-efficiency diesel's that have been coming out in the last 10 years is certainly a very good idea since as soon as more bio-diesel is available you use it without any modification. There is a bio-diesel station in my neighborhood $2.99/gallon. The 100+ labs are working on algae oil, and if that pays off you won't need used cooking oil.
@kbs1138 According to study's Recycled bio-diesel will not work in the newer H.E. Diesel engines. I make remanufactured diesel at a cost of $.65 per gallon. You could add another $.48 per gallon if you add $20.00 per hour to pay someone for the labor I put in to create it. It runs cleaner and the engines last longer then with traditional diesel. I have been doing this for a year now.
@odinata Uhhh, no...I don't HAVE the car. GLENN DOES. Are you just trying to be obstinate? If you are trying to start an argument, you'll be arguing with yourself. I only commented on your original question of "Should I like this car or not?" Just trying to have a light-hearted conservative conversation on a comments page of You-Tube. Neeeevermind. Good-bye.
Fuel cells are too expensive. That car will retail over 6 figures. Plus there isn't enough precious metals to make the fuel cells for everyone in the world to have one. The better solution is to use standard internal combustion engines running hydrogen instead of gasoline.
water2gashawaii 6 months ago
make you own hydrogen at home at hydrofuelsys (dot) com
water2gashawaii 6 months ago
WOW glenn beck is a queef
gavinmacrae 9 months ago
This man is one of the biggest idiots I have ever had the displeasure of watching in the media.
His inane commentary and constant ridicule of anyone pushing for smarter energy ruined what could have been a great expose on really ground-breaking technology.
ReyAce00 10 months ago
200 miles for me cost me about $30. I wonder if a Hydrogen truck could cut that in half... hmmm, I guess we will never know?
That is a really sweet sound when it turns off =)
08SilveradoLT 1 year ago
In the newly released budget, the U.S. Department of Energy cuts $100 million from the hydrogen fuel cell program in fiscal year 2010 and transforms its name to "fuel cell technologies." Hydrogen, of course, is just the fuel of a fuel cell—a device that recombines hydrogen and oxygen to produce water and electrical current. Still, the name change distances the Obama administration from the "hydrogen economy" goals of their predecessors.
pangeanet 1 year ago
Ok, let me get this straight. We developed a technology that emits water vapor. Ending our dependence Islamic oil. and our president Ended this programs. Wow, aren't you glad he's in office.
coliwood 1 year ago
@coliwood you've haven't got it straight. there is still funding for the basic research that is still needed. The car company cut back themselves when they almost went bankrupt. Those fuel cells are still very expensive, makes the Volt or the Tesla look as cheap as bicycle. The primary source of hydrogen is petrochemical so it wouldn't end your dependence on Islamic oil.
kbs1138 1 year ago
@kbs1138 I understand that but, that technology would greatly reduce our oil dependence, so much so, we would have to have Islamic oil. I live in detroit and I am a member of UAW local 155. GM was fine, the bailout was the company could meet it's union obligations. In essence, it was the UAW that was bailed out.
coliwood 1 year ago
Hey, when are those gonna be on the market? Oh wait. Never, thanks to the Obama administration.
StarWarzFreak92 1 year ago 5
@StarWarzFreak92 actually do some reading about the facts rather than watching something idiot talking head on TV (of any political persuasion).
kbs1138 1 year ago
@kbs1138 I do, thanks.
StarWarzFreak92 1 year ago
Hehehe Glenn you're awesome!!!
liztrot 1 year ago
Thank you Mr. Obama for taking something else away from the American people.
GoD2483 1 year ago 3
and to think by now these things could have been on the road already instead of the epic fail volt, one thing i haven heard is how much it will cost per "charge" (40 miles) it will add to our already expensive electric bills.
phatmanxxxl 1 year ago
$8.00 a fillup "things that make you go HMMMMMMM"
beecarpet 1 year ago
Excellent look at a great concept. I wonder why it has been shelved.
Tourney64 1 year ago
YEP! Makes no sense to have this when we can use electricity.
PartyOfKNOW 1 year ago
I have been screaming for hydrogen cars for thirty years and all I have ever heard is " Hey dummy have you never seen the Hindenbergh crash?" With that kind of forward thinking we would never have flown in airplanes. After they crash you know.
beecarpet 1 year ago
Typical, if it could truly save the environment the progressives don't want it. Just goes to show the progressives only are using the environmentalists as a distraction in order to gain more power over the people.
xtaxplayer 1 year ago
@xtaxplayer two things, large scale affordable hydrogen production currently has to come from petroleum based resources. No guarantee that sunlight based production of Hydrogen will ever make sense. Second, switching from an oil infrastructure to a hydrogen infrastructure would require government involvement on a huge scale. If you want power to the people now, think biodiesal and electric.
kbs1138 1 year ago
@kbs1138 Where do you think electricity comes from?
racerx25 1 year ago
@kbs1138
How does hydrogen production have to come from petroleum based energy? It's called nuclear power... remember that? Before the hippie freaks destroyed that plan too? As for changing infrastructure, there was already a private sector deal with Shell to outfit gas stations with hydrogen pumps.
Bio diesel is inefficient, stresses land fertility, eats into food production, uses millions of acres of land, and still isn't emission free. Also, it has had MASSIVE government involvement.
N37BU6 1 year ago
@N37BU6 Most hydrogen is produced by breaking down natural gas into hydrogen and carbon dioxide. if you are suggesting that we use electricity from nuclear power plants to create hydrogen, that's hugely inefficient and would creates lots of nuclear waste, lots of strip mining. Thorium based reactors would certainly be an alternative if they can get support, but it's still much more efficient to use the electricity directly. Next generation biodiesel does not have the drawbacks you mention.
kbs1138 1 year ago
@kbs1138 1) Large scale Hydrogen could be phased in privately. 2) I recycle Cooking oil to diesel now and I have a hydrogen generator on my only gas vehicle. It went from 18 miles per gallon to 33. Electric is a non-option to expensive on both ends.
xtaxplayer 1 year ago
@xtaxplayer private phase-in would require it be cheaper than current technology, it's not and not likely to be for the foreseeable future. High-efficiency diesel's that have been coming out in the last 10 years is certainly a very good idea since as soon as more bio-diesel is available you use it without any modification. There is a bio-diesel station in my neighborhood $2.99/gallon. The 100+ labs are working on algae oil, and if that pays off you won't need used cooking oil.
kbs1138 1 year ago
@kbs1138 According to study's Recycled bio-diesel will not work in the newer H.E. Diesel engines. I make remanufactured diesel at a cost of $.65 per gallon. You could add another $.48 per gallon if you add $20.00 per hour to pay someone for the labor I put in to create it. It runs cleaner and the engines last longer then with traditional diesel. I have been doing this for a year now.
xtaxplayer 1 year ago
Yup...this car makes TOO much sense,.. scrap it and make an electric pile of crap that nobody will buy ! Way to go Commie Motors !
nitrofumes 1 year ago
This comment section is probably about to blow up because of that @hersey10 ;-)
adamthestimator 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Glen Beck Murdered and raped a girl in 1990
Etherlad 2 years ago
Yeah, i hate trees and fish too. I'm confused though. Should I like this car or not. I hate the environment.
odinata 3 years ago
@odinata like it because of the direct savings to YOU. Hate it because it will lump you in with 'look at me' enviromental whackos... ;-)
adamthestimator 1 year ago
@adamthestimator
What "direct savings to YOU"?
odinata 1 year ago
@odinata $8/tank of Hydrogen vs $45 to $75 a tank of Gasoline...
adamthestimator 1 year ago
@adamthestimator
where are you buying hydrogen at 8 bucks a tank?
odinata 1 year ago
@odinata I'm not. Glen was. Watch from 3:30 through 3:45. He mentions how much it costs to fill the car's tanks.
adamthestimator 1 year ago
@adamthestimator
So there IS no direct savings to YOU, now is there.
odinata 1 year ago
@odinata Uhhh, no...I don't HAVE the car. GLENN DOES. Are you just trying to be obstinate? If you are trying to start an argument, you'll be arguing with yourself. I only commented on your original question of "Should I like this car or not?" Just trying to have a light-hearted conservative conversation on a comments page of You-Tube. Neeeevermind. Good-bye.
adamthestimator 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@adamthestimator
"odinata like it because of the direct savings to YOU. "
I'm not getting any direct savings. YOU aren't getting any direct savings.
Why in the hell did you open your mouth in the first place?
odinata 1 year ago
@odinata why don't your opinions change science?
ODlNATA 7 months ago
@odinata
where are they selling hydrogen for 8 bucks a tank?
odinata 1 year ago