I hate idiots like him. Just because he was "joking" he can do something stupid like that, but if something were to happen to him he takes it to court.
i hate how the plaintiff keeps saying "so that justifies him acting like a fool and jumping..." nothing has to justify the defendant acting like a fool just like nothing justified the foolish plaintiff jumping on his car
@esther19741974 in a civil matter in the courts, the magistrate/judge decides who gets what based on all evidence and their own judgement. If he doesn't like her decision he can always go to another court and appeal. For $300 it wouldnt be worth it.
@tibbydibby - She's allowed to. Besides, the defendant had a pretty fair case. The plaintiff provoked the incident. If the plaintiff claimed he apologised for the accident then it would be a different story, but instead the plaintiff openly admitted to being a dick.
i think the other one should have paid for the damage. just because i pushed you a little bit for fun, it does not give you the right to punch me in the face and break my nose. you first have to see how big is the damage that the opponent made and react accordingly.
@fffinol Actually it does give me the right, let's take the cars out of the situation and replace them with people, some guy walked up behind him at night and gave him an unprovoked "friendly push", the person has the right to respond in self defense as he doesn't know if the push was friendly or not, but we aren't talking about a shove, we're talking about a shove with a car, his actions were completely justified.
@dragonforce525 I think you are a little bit wrong about your opinion. First, the plaintiff was his friend and not some stranger. Second, even if a stranger walks up behind me at night and gives me an unprovoked "friendly push" , I cannot break his nose as long as he does not have a knife in his hand or something. I will give you an easier example to understand. I pushed your notebook and if fell under the desk. I did this for fun. Do you think it can give you the reason to tear my notebook?
@fffinol But you're taking something trivial and saying it's the same thing, it's like saying killing an ant is just as bad as killing a person. No I personally wouldn't tear your notebook for knocking mine on the floor, and I wouldn't break your nose for playfully shoving me, but if you rammed your car into the back of mine, even in a playful way, you'd be stupid not to expect some form of retaliation.
@dragonforce525 I don't understand why you don't understand it. You just don't make a clear knot of your statement and disappear. "Killing an ant is just as bad as killing a person" <- This is exactly what you are saying. Even you wouldn't believe it to be right. You wouldn't tear my notebook and break my nose, but retaliation that the defendant did was right??? What are you talking about?? Nothing is wrong with the metaphors that I came up with.
@fffinol No I understand, you think he overreacted in the same way me tearing up your notebook after you knocking mine on the floor would be an overreaction, but I disagree that he did overreact, I think that if you purposely drives into someone's car, regardless of whether there's damage or not, you can't call foul when the person responds in a similar manner.
@damodepimp It's more of an assistant, he swears in the defendants (when they give their oath that they are telling the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth), he also escorts the litigants in and out (sometimes early by request) and is also there as sort of a security guard. If the plaintiff and defendant start getting out of hand, he separates them, and occasionally he verbally reprimands them if they are disrespecting the judge (such as talking out of turn or over the judge).
@luisferr2001 The Plaintiff is a doofus for obvious reasons. The defendant is a doofus because he missed an opportunity to earn some money because really, he's the one who should be sueing. The plaintiff, of course, is the MUCH BIGGER doofus!
2 wrongs dont make a right, however, the P was an idiot, acting the fool by risking damage to someone else`s car and annoying them in the act so he returned the favour in a stronger way but without violence, a bad joke that misfired on him,end of case i guess
Well, both plaintiff and defendent receive $2600 for appearing on this episode. $100 appearance allowance of $100 plus half of $5000 (due to stalemate).
@realrocky8591 That isn't how it is. JJ is strict in the fact that idiots don't receive excess amount of money for nothing. You only get money for appearance and if you win.
"You only get money for appearance and if you win."
That's untrue, and blatantly so. The only cases where the losers don't get any extra money is when Judge Judy gives $5000 to the plaintiff, resulting in (5000-5000)/2 = 0 for the defendant.
@realrocky8591 so, if she denies either one or both , who is the winner?
i thought they had appearance fee, then competed for the money,,,i have never heard a simple explanation for how this works yet, can someone explain it completely, but in an idiots way so it`s simple to understand.
@realrocky8591 That is incorrect. The appearance fee is $300, and the Plaintiff will only receive what they are suing for if Judy rules in their favor, the Defendant will receive nothing unless they sue for a specific amount and it is ruled in their favor.
@killerchipmunkattack lol the Nadal comment!! i didn't see it at first but when I read your comment i was like ' OMG he really DOES look like Nadal with a bad haircut !! ' iv'e even forwarded the link onto my facebook page! hahahaha so funny :p
It's me again, and this time I've got something more to say. When I look at the Plaintiff who said "it's just a joke" with a blank, dumbass expression on his face, I feel like punching him out! Anybody who does something like that and say "it's just joke" deserves to be knocked out flat on his ass! How about the rest of you?
This judge is a fucking IDIOT. She lets her emotions take over her judgment and thinks of herself way to highly. What the plaintiff did might not of been the smartest thing to do, but that doesn't justify other people doing jackass things in revenge.
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. I would of loved to see judge Marilyn Milian take this case instead of this retarded women who thinks she's a big shot who, just because is a judge, thinks she is better than other people.
@majch You see, Judge judy is awesome. What sets her apart from other judge's, who are idiots and slow, is she doesn't play games. She gets to the point, which is the cold truth. So if she acts smarter than other people, ugh, that's because she is. This world is full of idiots, and it's very likely you're one of them. Judge judy is just here to point them in the right direction. So if you don't like what you see, fuck off, get the fuck over it. and watch a Marilyn Milian show next time.
@majch oh yea and uve studied law for over 10 years and have over 50+ years expirence. fuck off you peice of scumbag shit. although u might not understand her judgement im sure judge judy was right, she knows what shes doing. so fuck off u dirtbag bitch go slit yo throat
@majch I agree with you. If the P did something wrong it does not give the D authority to do what ever he likes..and destroy his car. He should have first checked his car and if there was any damage then he should have sued him..thats what the courts are for..and exactly thats what jj also tells litigants most of the time.
@majch@majch I agree with you. If the P did something wrong it does not give the D authority to do what ever he likes..and destroy his car. He should have first checked his car and if there was any damage then he should have sued him..thats what the courts are for..and exactly thats what jj also tells litigants most of the time.
I think that both should have paid. If a person bumped into me for fun, it wouldn't be right if I turned around and hit them in the eye. Too much of an over reaction. I do understand the judge's ruling but that's a lot of money for a kid. Now, there's only going to be bad feelings between them. It's too bad.
She basically wanted to tell him that the case was not going to last long at all so he should not settle down and be comfortable because he would have to leave soon since the case would end soon
@inordinatefondness what are you talking about - meeting in a parking lot doesnt mean drug deal all the time. Thats like saying because a man is tall and black means he automatically is a great basketball player and probably professional. Me and my friends used to hang out in parking lots all the time and I have never done drugs in my life. What do you expect when probably 98% of people from 16-26 stay up really late and go out really late.
@strider643 Without a doubt! Even though the defendant was wrong in jumping on the plaintiff's car in anger, This dumbass plaintiff started the whole thing. You don't use a car, or any vehicle as a joke to rile someone. He's lucky he didn't do it in a faster speed. He could hurt somebody that way! Total Dumbass!!
@Buandelmonte123 bow-chicka wah wah
WesleySnipes1996 2 days ago
I love it . The defendant barely said two words and he won. The plaintiff is an idiot.
looneychooney 1 week ago
Some social life these guys have. Meeting in a parking lot at night. I cannot imagine what they might have been doing.
Buondelmonte123 1 week ago
Lololololol
MEGIDIOT 2 weeks ago
what's with the girl dancing in the gallery at 2:36
emmalovesbuffy 3 weeks ago
Damn. Helloooooo defendant;]
ItsToshBetch 4 weeks ago
Sounds right to me! Bye!
cymraegambyth 4 weeks ago
I hate idiots like him. Just because he was "joking" he can do something stupid like that, but if something were to happen to him he takes it to court.
XChildeofMalkavX 1 month ago
Stupid motherfucker.
vionnavalis 1 month ago
i bet they were baked
MellowChords 2 months ago
Good work, Hammurabi.
gnortznitz 2 months ago
i would hav done the same judgement
samsingh851985 2 months ago
doofus! how funny
randallrayrichards 2 months ago in playlist Court Videos
This has been flagged as spam show
seems like just with 1 doofus
21bronxbombers 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
well said Judy!!
mokugin81 4 months ago
She should've at least made the defendant pay $20 to the court for his hairdo.
MrBlemph 5 months ago 5
Well played VEVO!!!
emproar02 5 months ago
Ah nothin like people who come on judge judy get seen by 10 million people see U shine!
MrLehnerd 6 months ago 2
i hate how the plaintiff keeps saying "so that justifies him acting like a fool and jumping..." nothing has to justify the defendant acting like a fool just like nothing justified the foolish plaintiff jumping on his car
AndrogynousMarley 6 months ago 2
WHAT A TWIT THE PLAINTIFF IS.
MEDSEC20 6 months ago
Isn't the plural of doofus "doofi"?
fjccommish 6 months ago 14
@fjccommish lol
amusedbygod 6 months ago
@fjccommish hahaha
rockerduff1231 6 months ago
@fjccommish isn't that the name of the retarded guy in one of the Scary Movies?
EllaKillsssKids 1 month ago
@EllaKillsssKids His name was Doofy,
fjccommish 1 month ago
@fjccommish same difference
EllaKillsssKids 1 month ago
sneeze at 1:38
bottom left :D
1018JBrown 7 months ago
Some people are dumb until it costs them money.
Then they wise up...sometimes.
Lawlessuk 8 months ago
2 doofuses
2 doofus
2 doofi
itsakitten 8 months ago 2
JUST A MINUTE THATS ONLY IF I SAY SO? WHAT ABOUT THE LAW???
esther19741974 8 months ago
@esther19741974 in a civil matter in the courts, the magistrate/judge decides who gets what based on all evidence and their own judgement. If he doesn't like her decision he can always go to another court and appeal. For $300 it wouldnt be worth it.
tryandlisten 8 months ago
@esther19741974 um. silly esther, the law isn't perfect. that's why we have courts.
jamiechang2011 7 months ago
Also, just noticed but I love that Judge Judy went completely on the Defendant's side and defended him. GOSH THAT PLANTIFF, WHAT WAS HE THINKING?!?
tibbydibby 8 months ago
@tibbydibby - She's allowed to. Besides, the defendant had a pretty fair case. The plaintiff provoked the incident. If the plaintiff claimed he apologised for the accident then it would be a different story, but instead the plaintiff openly admitted to being a dick.
rayjaymor85 7 months ago
It is as judy says, Don't pull a prank on a pig. It doesn't work. And it annoys you when the pig farted back !!!
deestilo 8 months ago
soulja boy? really?
LeBronForTheWin 8 months ago
Idiot, it's like poking a snake and blaming it for biting you.
eltimido503 8 months ago 31
@eltimido503 a snake is an animal though. Bad example but i do understand what you mean.
kakburkmedlingon 4 months ago
THUMBS DOWN just because of this pathetic ad in the middle.
matteoprez 8 months ago
Two gay guys trying to get each other's attention.
watcher4234 8 months ago
oh gosh. THE LITIGANTS, idk.
tibbydibby 8 months ago
LOL, racist dancing lady at 2:35, notice she stops immediately when the bailiff sees her
MIS315 9 months ago
lol
sexyelexia 9 months ago
Poor waist of time for JJ. Hehe
Eyeglompyou 9 months ago
@Eyeglompyou you mean waste ? lol
giveit2mehardmad 8 months ago
@giveit2mehardmad Yeah, I mint -I MEAN- meant that XD
Eyeglompyou 8 months ago
2:35 CYA!
MaxMetal1993 9 months ago
lol
polooxman 9 months ago
lol
feast69 9 months ago
lol
feast69 9 months ago
they should have 20 year old boy sex
ljude01 9 months ago
i think the other one should have paid for the damage. just because i pushed you a little bit for fun, it does not give you the right to punch me in the face and break my nose. you first have to see how big is the damage that the opponent made and react accordingly.
fffinol 9 months ago
@fffinol Actually it does give me the right, let's take the cars out of the situation and replace them with people, some guy walked up behind him at night and gave him an unprovoked "friendly push", the person has the right to respond in self defense as he doesn't know if the push was friendly or not, but we aren't talking about a shove, we're talking about a shove with a car, his actions were completely justified.
dragonforce525 9 months ago
@dragonforce525 I think you are a little bit wrong about your opinion. First, the plaintiff was his friend and not some stranger. Second, even if a stranger walks up behind me at night and gives me an unprovoked "friendly push" , I cannot break his nose as long as he does not have a knife in his hand or something. I will give you an easier example to understand. I pushed your notebook and if fell under the desk. I did this for fun. Do you think it can give you the reason to tear my notebook?
fffinol 9 months ago
@fffinol But you're taking something trivial and saying it's the same thing, it's like saying killing an ant is just as bad as killing a person. No I personally wouldn't tear your notebook for knocking mine on the floor, and I wouldn't break your nose for playfully shoving me, but if you rammed your car into the back of mine, even in a playful way, you'd be stupid not to expect some form of retaliation.
dragonforce525 9 months ago
@dragonforce525 I don't understand why you don't understand it. You just don't make a clear knot of your statement and disappear. "Killing an ant is just as bad as killing a person" <- This is exactly what you are saying. Even you wouldn't believe it to be right. You wouldn't tear my notebook and break my nose, but retaliation that the defendant did was right??? What are you talking about?? Nothing is wrong with the metaphors that I came up with.
fffinol 9 months ago
@fffinol No I understand, you think he overreacted in the same way me tearing up your notebook after you knocking mine on the floor would be an overreaction, but I disagree that he did overreact, I think that if you purposely drives into someone's car, regardless of whether there's damage or not, you can't call foul when the person responds in a similar manner.
dragonforce525 9 months ago
I dont understand why Bert is there if he does crosswords all the time? Isnt that an important job?
damodepimp 9 months ago
@damodepimp It's more of an assistant, he swears in the defendants (when they give their oath that they are telling the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth), he also escorts the litigants in and out (sometimes early by request) and is also there as sort of a security guard. If the plaintiff and defendant start getting out of hand, he separates them, and occasionally he verbally reprimands them if they are disrespecting the judge (such as talking out of turn or over the judge).
indigothecat 9 months ago
@damodepimp His name's not "Bert". It's "Byrd."
lionofthejungle 7 months ago
Dude....WTF was that Soulja Joke shit in the middle of the vid?? Oh wait, nevermind...
(sigh)
DragonAurora 9 months ago
its really only one doofus, i understand why the guy jumped up on his car and broke the mirror!
luisferr2001 10 months ago
@luisferr2001 The Plaintiff is a doofus for obvious reasons. The defendant is a doofus because he missed an opportunity to earn some money because really, he's the one who should be sueing. The plaintiff, of course, is the MUCH BIGGER doofus!
dockside2012 9 months ago
The One With 2 Doofuses? That doesn't exactly narrow it down, you know.
dantheman931 10 months ago
1:26 -- how about more videos with this chick?!
WonkaVator72 10 months ago
Alot of people need to look at there case from a different point of view before coming onto tv
Sil3ntcreed 10 months ago
Damn your little ad midway! rofl it was just short enough that I didnt go anywhere! Good on ya!
Furthericity 10 months ago
"This ain't gonna take long" LOL
Crystalwhirl18 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The defendant should have lost ..... for having a terrible hiarstyle that looks like it was cut by Stevie Wonder on crack.
GeorgeP97 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The defendant should have lost the case .............. for having a terrible hairstyle that looks like it was cut by Stevie Wonder on crack.
GeorgeP97 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The defendant should have lost the case .............. for having a terrible hairstyle that looks like it was cut by Stevie Wonder on crack.
GeorgeP97 10 months ago
Comment removed
GeorgeP97 10 months ago
LOL
PalerLaze 10 months ago
2 wrongs dont make a right, however, the P was an idiot, acting the fool by risking damage to someone else`s car and annoying them in the act so he returned the favour in a stronger way but without violence, a bad joke that misfired on him,end of case i guess
jackscal1 10 months ago
According to his logic... we should be able to punch the guy as long as it's "just for kicks" and not have to worry about getting sued.
yudanielk 11 months ago
lol at everyone cracking up at the end,
survivorfan1234 11 months ago
bwahaha I thought one of them was actually named doofus….dissappointed
OldNewsThinker 11 months ago
Man, that was a funny case. I love the ending! Judge Judy is such a great entertainer.
beakt 11 months ago
Not that big of a deal. Why are they the doofuses? I've seen much worse than this.
BandWagon1987 11 months ago
BAAI,.
LOL
BeautyBoyTV 1 year ago
hahahaha this is hands down the funniest episode of judge judy.
lilalbsure 1 year ago 3
They're both idiots.
TreyParkersBitch 1 year ago
I think these two did this for their 3 minutes of fame. Pathetic ...
DivineRequiem 1 year ago
Well, both plaintiff and defendent receive $2600 for appearing on this episode. $100 appearance allowance of $100 plus half of $5000 (due to stalemate).
realrocky8591 1 year ago
@realrocky8591 That isn't how it is. JJ is strict in the fact that idiots don't receive excess amount of money for nothing. You only get money for appearance and if you win.
nick2s 1 year ago
@nick2s
"You only get money for appearance and if you win."
That's untrue, and blatantly so. The only cases where the losers don't get any extra money is when Judge Judy gives $5000 to the plaintiff, resulting in (5000-5000)/2 = 0 for the defendant.
realrocky8591 1 year ago
@realrocky8591 your explanation makes less sense then most of the theories i have read online. I know my explanation is fact.
nick2s 1 year ago
@realrocky8591 so, if she denies either one or both , who is the winner?
i thought they had appearance fee, then competed for the money,,,i have never heard a simple explanation for how this works yet, can someone explain it completely, but in an idiots way so it`s simple to understand.
jackscal1 10 months ago
@jackscal1
If she denies them both, then both receive their appearance fee of $100, and then split the pot of $5,000, which is $2,500 for each.
realrocky8591 10 months ago
@realrocky8591 That is incorrect. The appearance fee is $300, and the Plaintiff will only receive what they are suing for if Judy rules in their favor, the Defendant will receive nothing unless they sue for a specific amount and it is ruled in their favor.
grapefruitguru 10 months ago
nice hairdo losers - like a Ken doll helmet wig
ozzyinny 1 year ago
nice when the defendant says correct at the end sounds like " hell yeah mothafucka"
ollilui 1 year ago
The defendant handled himself very well.
Mojosbigstick 1 year ago
@Mojosbigstick I get the feeling he handles himself a lot
ozzyinny 1 year ago
@ozzyinny *b-booom cha!* Name me a man who doesn't!
Mojosbigstick 1 year ago
JJ should have made the defendant pay for having such a moronic haircut...
paulreider 1 year ago
@paulreider why bother? - having a haircut like that is both the offence AND the punishment...
hoss1962 1 year ago
The defendant looks SO much like Rafael Nadal, but with a different haircut :O
killerchipmunkattack 1 year ago
@killerchipmunkattack loool ur comment made me laugh so much !! lol
GreekBiaaatch 1 year ago
@GreekBiaaatch Haha it was meant as quite a serious comment actually. But thanks for making me feel like I'm funny. teehee =p
killerchipmunkattack 1 year ago
@GreekBiaaatch Wait, the cars comment or the Nadal comment? lol
killerchipmunkattack 1 year ago
@killerchipmunkattack lol the Nadal comment!! i didn't see it at first but when I read your comment i was like ' OMG he really DOES look like Nadal with a bad haircut !! ' iv'e even forwarded the link onto my facebook page! hahahaha so funny :p
GreekBiaaatch 1 year ago
OOH! What craptacular hair!
MegaSweetness76 1 year ago
Lol at the idiot woman dancing in the front row at 2:35
Venusfading 1 year ago 67
@Venusfading people like that should be murdered.
interpolnarc 8 months ago
Comment removed
Venusfading 1 year ago
Plaintiff - you a re a moron and got what you deserved - nothing!
skaggsey 1 year ago
It's me again, and this time I've got something more to say. When I look at the Plaintiff who said "it's just a joke" with a blank, dumbass expression on his face, I feel like punching him out! Anybody who does something like that and say "it's just joke" deserves to be knocked out flat on his ass! How about the rest of you?
dog453679 1 year ago
you can hear people from the audience yelling at the plaintiff when he's leaving: 2:36 and 2:42
PornoPlaylist 1 year ago
The plaintiff is an idiot. He deserves everything except a girlfriend !
cedrikledlp 1 year ago
only thing i dont like is how disrespectful the audiences can be sometimes
sgtforge21 1 year ago
Plaintiff is a prissy little bitch
carrots26 1 year ago 2
I love Byrd's "this ain't gonna take long" brilliant
miriam4757 1 year ago
sounds right to me...... BYE!! LMAO
TheBaldEagleGod 1 year ago
JJ is the shit.
JKrump0 1 year ago
This judge is a fucking IDIOT. She lets her emotions take over her judgment and thinks of herself way to highly. What the plaintiff did might not of been the smartest thing to do, but that doesn't justify other people doing jackass things in revenge.
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. I would of loved to see judge Marilyn Milian take this case instead of this retarded women who thinks she's a big shot who, just because is a judge, thinks she is better than other people.
majch 1 year ago
@majch yes but you must understand that everybody will react that way, you cannot change the world, just regulate it as REALISTICALLY as possible.
EweTubee 1 year ago
@majch You see, Judge judy is awesome. What sets her apart from other judge's, who are idiots and slow, is she doesn't play games. She gets to the point, which is the cold truth. So if she acts smarter than other people, ugh, that's because she is. This world is full of idiots, and it's very likely you're one of them. Judge judy is just here to point them in the right direction. So if you don't like what you see, fuck off, get the fuck over it. and watch a Marilyn Milian show next time.
inturn23 1 year ago
@majch oh yea and uve studied law for over 10 years and have over 50+ years expirence. fuck off you peice of scumbag shit. although u might not understand her judgement im sure judge judy was right, she knows what shes doing. so fuck off u dirtbag bitch go slit yo throat
ghillieman24 1 year ago
@majch I agree with you. If the P did something wrong it does not give the D authority to do what ever he likes..and destroy his car. He should have first checked his car and if there was any damage then he should have sued him..thats what the courts are for..and exactly thats what jj also tells litigants most of the time.
alichem007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@majch @majch I agree with you. If the P did something wrong it does not give the D authority to do what ever he likes..and destroy his car. He should have first checked his car and if there was any damage then he should have sued him..thats what the courts are for..and exactly thats what jj also tells litigants most of the time.
alichem007 1 year ago
@majch I agree with you as well, this judgment is ridiculous and basically says that the defendant's actions were perfectly fine
angelcla23 11 months ago
@majch What she ruled out was right, obviously something you will never get.
LightningCreations 6 months ago
nobody mentioned the moronic haircut of the defendant. What a wanker
martsutube 1 year ago
the defendant is like wayyyy fuckin hot!!!
Jackswild30 1 year ago
Comment removed
palpatine93 1 year ago
I love Byrd "dis aint gon take long"
roni333 1 year ago
that ad in the middle was retarded...
dcohen94 1 year ago 16
Fucking idiot plaintiff.. retard! cracker ass piece of shit!
pubuman 2 years ago
Lol, cracker ass?
Myco1976thanku 2 years ago
@Myco1976thanku Makes a pretty funny albeit disturbing visual =D
moodysoup 1 year ago
hahahahaha the peanut gallery really rides the plaintiff at the end.
b7702 2 years ago
Mr Byrd is funny.
lq32 2 years ago 2
Plantiff is an idiot, judge judy canned his ass
TheRevolutionCanada 2 years ago 2
plaintiff is cuuuuuuuuuuuute, kinda too tall but cute face
jogu78 2 years ago
I think that both should have paid. If a person bumped into me for fun, it wouldn't be right if I turned around and hit them in the eye. Too much of an over reaction. I do understand the judge's ruling but that's a lot of money for a kid. Now, there's only going to be bad feelings between them. It's too bad.
Songsmirth 2 years ago
Ummm.... if some fucking moron damaged your property on PURPOSE just for fun.. then you have every right to fuck that person up.
thi711 2 years ago
I thought the plural of 'doofus' would be 'doofii'? :p
camilleri63 2 years ago 11
It's actually dip-shits.
chertzle 2 years ago 2
I didn't quite understand what she said to Byrd, can anyone please kindly explain, when she said, "don't get comfortable".
Nejiboud 2 years ago
She basically wanted to tell him that the case was not going to last long at all so he should not settle down and be comfortable because he would have to leave soon since the case would end soon
bollyfever 2 years ago 4
ah, very much make sense, thanks so much.
Nejiboud 2 years ago
... cos the case would not last long ....
cococalm 2 years ago
he wasn't going 2 stay there for long it was going 2 be a quick case
Indigos8rboi 2 years ago
Omgosh!
LOL that's so funny!
The plaintif actually thot he had a case!
You don't "joke" with someones CAR!!!!!!!!
gzus4eva 2 years ago
that is one f*kt up hairstyle
WikeddTung 2 years ago
The defendant looks like a tiny emo
dreemaze 2 years ago 3
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAH THAT WAS AN AWESOME FINISH FROM JJ goddamn lmao BYE!!!
s0mdum9uy 2 years ago 3
That guys hair is beyond stupid, Id beat his ass for looking like a goofy retarded fuck from Mtv. :D
dick3234 2 years ago 4
lmao i think that was totally fair
rara1800 2 years ago 2
wtf haha a girl does a jig in the audience at 2:26
footyspoak 2 years ago
Is this anything to do with the whole mangina, mouthgina, swine flu infections that keep popping up?
CustomJ 2 years ago
That defendant looks like a goof.
spaciousgalaxy 2 years ago 3
wtf, was that a trumpet???
AuntFlo81 2 years ago
"So I jumped on his hood to get his attention" What a dumbass
cadetleader 2 years ago
WowW plaintiff hottie!!!
abbetsoriano 2 years ago
You know what would be an awesome prank? A car accident!!!! hee hee hee LMAO oh god my parents will be so proud.
Meeting in a parking lot after dark= DRUG DEAL
I'm surprised Judy didn't latch onto that.
inordinatefondness 2 years ago 4
Yeah, really. i was thinking the same thing. This was a deal of some sort going down.
AsSomedayItMayHappen 2 years ago
@inordinatefondness what are you talking about - meeting in a parking lot doesnt mean drug deal all the time. Thats like saying because a man is tall and black means he automatically is a great basketball player and probably professional. Me and my friends used to hang out in parking lots all the time and I have never done drugs in my life. What do you expect when probably 98% of people from 16-26 stay up really late and go out really late.
Marrowni 1 year ago
Hilarious!
Njc0las 2 years ago 3
D= SUPER FUCKING HOT
sjsteveo 2 years ago
That Plaintiff is a moron, haha!! He gets what he deserves.
kalmanizer 2 years ago 22
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Defendant = Total Hottie
Kneenibble 2 years ago
Plaintiff = Total Dumbass
strider643 2 years ago 27
@strider643 Without a doubt! Even though the defendant was wrong in jumping on the plaintiff's car in anger, This dumbass plaintiff started the whole thing. You don't use a car, or any vehicle as a joke to rile someone. He's lucky he didn't do it in a faster speed. He could hurt somebody that way! Total Dumbass!!
dog453679 1 year ago
@strider643 Haha yeah what 20 year old grown-up just hits his friend's car "as a joke"?? You aren't playing bumper cars!
killerchipmunkattack 1 year ago