i did some research on this video. this monk is 32nd generation of shaolin. his birth name is wang deqing(王德庆） and he got a given name shi xinghong(释行鸿）by shaolin. he study kongfu in shaolin since he was 9 years old and leave shaolin when he was 25.
in 1999, he went to Hungary to teach kongfu.
now he is the teacher of police force in Hungary and he is asked to write a test book about martial arts for the police force of Hungary
va ninguno de los dos se pego!!!!!!!!!!! por que ??? los dos retroceden como mamitas al ataque del otro. cuando uno retrocede asi seguro que el otro no te va a pegar pero lo seguro es que vos tampoco cuando quieras contraatacar . por eso se corta el ataque enemigo para meter el mio!!
@123lebz bruce lee was the best fighter in the world??? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA OMG you pathetic go suck his dick then lol hows his ass look? thats so ignorant to call one man the best fighter lol he never really fought anybody except punk americans who thought they knew how to fight and beat up people in movies that is all, if he were to get in the ring or cage today these guys today would destroy him=)
@123lebz not the best- nobody is the best. God hasnt made some better n some bader humas. but i like bruce also like many other. he had just a strong will. n ''will can make u nearly invinvible. but will alone is not enough ;)
Shaolin was performing or sth in Korea, and the korean asked them to fight as a request. Shaolin had no other means but to accept.
And then the abbot of Shaolin told the fighter (Deqing Wang) to obey the Taekwondo rules, not to attack with hands and not to hurt the opponent. Also asked him to try to performance for audiences.
That's why the monk didn't attack too much. Don't u think the monk didnt try his best?
@yeko1993 exactly you could know every martial art in the world but if you dont have heart and right mind youll never win if you cant conquer yourselff
When fighting your stand should be firm. i dont like tkd because focuses too much on kicks. Its flashy but when you are kicking, a low sweep kick will take you out easily
Women are very flexible.But at one point the bone cannot be hyperextended without being broken or pulled out of socket. Flexibility increases range of motion which the muscles will allow. But if a Joint can't go the other way..... Well it can't go the other way.
@BlackShinobiShozoku Well, the thing is that ''tongzigong'' allows far more range than it is conceivable. if we applied the exercise on a normal person, i think he'd be badly injured and he would be injured if you applied a sort of lock. But with extreme flexibility, the fighter will escape from ur grasp before u completely control him, that is of course, if you ever get this chance before u get killed.
@bozanism Do you think Jujutsuka are not flexible?
We have techniques that can be nullified by better flexbility. Of course.(Ex. kubi hishigi)
Doesn't really hinder much... Just move on the techniques that actually pull joints out of socket or hyper extend a joint. Which doesn't matter how flexible you are. And being flexible doesn't stop us from controlling. Our control comes from our pins and positioning. Which gives us leverage to control you.
@bozanism It will probably look like this. /watch?v=JjK0g-cDJI4
But that's Brazillian Jiu Jitsu. I'm Traditional JuJutsu. I would use a throw preferably to a double leg takedown. So our takedowns are much harsher.
But the result would be the same. We would establish control. Even though that guy was very flexible. And make them helpless. And we can choose to Choke, Break, Restrain, or Punish.
Lol seventeen posts of mindless arguement about what martial art is better in a street fight by two people who have no dictionary to look up street fight... Really... One claims to know a bit o ground and pound. The other claims to know a bit o poke the eyes and rip da ball sacks. I think they both need to go fight on the street and see who wins! Most likely there will be great take downs, fancy flying kicks and a whole lotta eyes and ballz layin around! It will be epic! ... Fail
ohhh yeah thats right i forgot its a cardinal sin to be on your back in the oh so dangerous street fight! amazing thing is well over half of street fights END UP ON THE GROUND. these traditional martial arts guys found it dishonorable to hit a man while hes down...yet they allow biting and eye gouging and low blows? weird? the gracies proved bjj was far superior to any of the striking martial arts. and mma guys have proved what works and what doesnt inside the cage.
Even UFC has rules in a real fight try your jujitsu on a kungfu guy and he will pluck out your eyes or maybe rip off your ball sack. Thats reality. UFC just has less rules than boxing or k1. It is still not what would happen in a real life or death situation.
i love how you guys make it seem like your dirty tactic are the be all and end all of a fight. like "yeah man id jut gouge your eye or punch you in the nutsack and id win" its not and never will be as easy as you say it will be. im sorry it just doesnt work like that. and why in fucks holy mothers name would you need to eye gouge someone or go for their balls? like listen to what youre saying here. you just admitted the only way you can win is by fighting like a girl...that sucks...
But you're saying the only way MMA fighters could win is with a set list of rules. Ever see a UFC fight where a guy gets tagged real good? Yeah, he's done for a good 2 or 3 minutes. It's effective. Kung Fu isn't made for competition, it's made for self defense against multiple attackers, unlike BJJ. While you're doing a flying armbar someone else is gonna brain you with someone other than his fist. Different styles for different situations.
"But you're saying the only way MMA fighters could win is with a set list of rules."
when did i say that? i just said that because they fight with rules there is nothing stoppping them from fighting with dirty tactics (which i think are stupid, gutless, moronic, cheap, dirty, and a retarded excuse for a "martial art") anymore then the last guy.
But training for MMA means training based on a specific rule set. There's no reason for them to learn anything outside of what they can use in the octagon. And yes, martial arts do employ dirty tactics, because martial arts were developed in a time when your opponent was literally trying to kill you by any means necessary, and normally you were fighting more than 1 guy. But I guess you don't understand that because you've been a complete idiot so far about it.
and what the fuck do you fucking train that is so fucking special? you think because you fucking have been told "how" to eye gouge and kick someone in the balls means you know everything about how to kick a guy whos trained bjj, wreslting, muay thai, boxing. this isnt anchient chinese temples were fighting in. a street fight is nothing more then dirty boxing and some grappling. christ mma guys have fought for years to prove they arent "street fighters" and here i am arguing it over the internet
No, that's a planned bare knuckle boxing match. Ever see an MMA fighter get poked in the eye? You know why it happens? Because they don't train to protect against eye pokes, they train to protect against punches. As long as a fist isn't being throwing, they let hands real close. And in a real fight where someone is really trying to hurt you, or where you're dealing out GnP, they might go for an eye gouge. MMA is a SPORT. Kung Fu is SELF DEFENSE. There's a DIFFERENCE in those meanings.
STOP overexxaggerting street fights. i am so fucking sick and tired of reading what a kung fu guys interpretation of a street fight is "blah blah youll get jumped by 3 guys and get stabbed and then get your eyes pulled out" im sorry but there are millions of street fight videos on youtube. you tell me how many have more then one attacker and weapins. barely any. its basically all 1 on 1 dirty boxing fights and some grappling and ground and pound. explain how mma training is non applicable?
Wait wait. So you're telling me that you think an actual street fight is a premeditated event in which people have time to grab video cameras and shit? You are stupid. There's a difference between a street fight and a bare knuckle fight retard. A street fight is actually getting jumped by people. That's not over exaggerating. People having weapons isn't over exaggerating either. You're a complete moron if you think EVERY fight happens like it does for a Kimbo video. Even they have rules.
oh my fucking god now youre changing around what your definition of a street fght is. SHUT THE FUCK UP AND PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT IM TELLING YOU. a street fight is nothing more then a fight with no rules. it doesnt even have to be on a street. can be in a hotel hallway. you cant go and change around the definition of what a "street fight" is now and think thats gunna win me over. fact of the matter is nowadays muay thai, boxing, jiu jitsu, wrestling, youre gunna need alot more....
no when a mma guy gets poked in the eye its accidental from a fucked up punch he was going to block. all im saying is that just because the styles mma guys train with have rules in a cage DOES NOT mean they cant just as easily beat the fuck out of someone when they are allowed to fight as dirty as they want. muay thai, bjj, boxing you name it is just as effective in a street fight as knowing kung fu
I never changed any definition of a street fight. You tried to define a street fight, and I told you you were wrong. Videos online are always 1-on-1. There's people around to make sure if someone's hurt it gets taken care of. In spur of the moment situations where a no one has time to grab the video recorder, THAT MIGHT NOT BE THE CASE. You're stupid to think that every fight you see on the internet automatically translates to "this is how every fight goes down in real life".
listen kid...most street fights end up on the ground. thats a fact look it up. truth is your cheapshots are not a deciding factor and will never work like portrayed in the movies. and i can guarantee youve never pulled someones eye out (and why youd need to is beyond me). the cage employs many different styles. all of which are much more practical in a real fight then this bullshit. just because there are rules to protect the fighters does not mean the styles they use arent better.....
jiu jitsu is the most widely taught self defense art for the reason being most street fights (which you kung fu guys greatly overexaggerate to make your style seem more useful then it is) end up on the ground. BJJ and mma guys have beaten countless kung fu karate self defense idiots in lots of videos yet we still get excuse after excuse. truth is mma fighters are much more practical and well rounded then any of these guys and would easily wipe the floor with them in the "street" with no rules
so what you people are saying is that this kung fu incorporates fancy non practical striking ,and cheap shots for "self defense"? so an mma fighter who has trained in all different styles of martial arts means his styles (which re much more practical and real world then this shit) would not be useful because somehow the only arts that work are the ones that incorporate cheapshots to win? so an mma fighter cant do them too? and from a better spot? IN MOUNT!
@foottothroat21 MMA shots are effective for ring and cage fighting. In the streets, MMA isnt the best ''martial art''. In contrast, shaolin kungfu is a deadly-art.
@BlackShinobiShozoku and what do you know? You've only seen the performance side of kungfu. And you've never been in a fight with a real kung fu fighter.
Well I know that MMA is the best way to prove that you're good at unarmed combat without having to actually go out in maim someone. And obviously you don't realize that it doesn't take much to go that extra inch to maim someone. When someone is being tapped out by joint locking. It's because the hold isn't be applied in a manner where we're trying to break the arm. We're controlled enough to where we can decide whether to get a TAP or BREAK THEIR ARMS.
@ProfessorOhms No, MMA is good for ground fighting. Yes, of course you're controlled, you fight for fun and disses each other. And wait, I am hallucinating or is the Monk here holding back his powerful kicks? Then you pretend that breaking arms is deadly. Euh...excuse me but I swear I've seen someone with a white cast walking down the street. Oh, and what happened to Frank Shamrock? You should know about him since you know that much about MMA.
And it's not always fighting for fun. Some times it's more than that.
Powerful kicks? I rarely see bones being broken by kicks. And kicks are fully legal in MMA. Having the ability to break bones is very deadly. Do you think arm Joint locking is the only form of joint locking?
Once I break your arm at the joint it's disabled. Before or after I could do a neck crank and block your carotid for extended period of time.
@BlackShinobiShozoku Well, take the example of Frank Shamrock who got kicked by Cung Le in a fight. Yes, joint lock is a powerful technique. However, thats if u succeed at locking down the opponent who doesnt strike ur neck or eyes-the weaker parts of a human body first. And if u dont believe me, the shaolin monks are pretty more flexible that im not sure ur joint locks will work. Watch ''tongzigong'', a sub-style of shaolin kungfu in which the practitioners become unbelievably flexible.
Frank Shamrock took MANY kicks from Cung Le. Not just one.
And striking necks and eyes won't help you against a Jujutsuka. Once you're on the ground with a powerful throw(which will probably break something already). We grab full control over our opponent. Therefore you're being controlled and we grab dominant positions. And if we want to... We'll smack you on the back of the head like a drum for play, before we break every bone in your body.
@BlackShinobiShozoku Well, Frank Shamrock ended up in hospital, not dead. what tells u that u will actually ever land a throw on us or before we strike ur temples, eyes, ears with a faint? Jujitsu is powerful for ground fighting, as i said before. But, it wouldnt be effective if the other fighter doesnt just throw punches with gloves and kicks and other attacks that will let u survive the hits so that u can resist and attack back.
Because once we close the distance and easily take you down. Because you don't know any counters to takedowns or defend against grappling. Those "strikes" become nullified. Because then you'll be lending us your balance. You can strike my temples and ears all day at close range. It's not going to do much. Versus me being able to throw you into next tuesday.(Which you'll be lucky not to suffer broken ribs). Then completely nullify your deadly art on the ground.
Frank Shamrock was told to stand up with Cung Le for one.
And for two Cung Le has wrestling background. Therefore he can change gameplan once hes on the ground and possibly survive/defend a takedown or make it to his feet.
Unless you have some knowledge about ground work. You won't last long in todays unarmed combat world. Unless it's two people who prefer to stand up and exchange strikes.
@ProfessorOhms I didn't say that shaolin kung fu is a godly ''deadly'' art. Its only true that it is a deadly art. If you studied a bit of history, you will read that Shaolin Monks were once forced to join the army in order to fight off Japanese pirates. During a fight, 50 Monks fought against hundreds of Japanese warrior. The war ended this way: 4 monks casualties and a hundred or so Japanese warriors. If shaolin kung fu is a sort of joke or an art of show, would it kill so many people?
And furthermore it was due to having a very good strategic leader.
And it wasn't hundreds of Japanese warriors. Actually most of the Wokou were Chinese. There was equal number of Monks and Pirates. And it was around 120 for both sides.
This does nothing to prove Shaolin Kung Fu as deadly as contrast to other arts.
Any art can become deadly once you place weapons in their hands.
@BlackShinobiShozoku Read this: The monks won their greatest victory at Wengjiagang.[18] On 21 July 1553, 120 warrior monks led by the Shaolin monk Tianyuan defeated a group of pirates and chased the survivors over ten days and twenty miles.[18] The pirates suffered over one hundred casualties and the monks only four.[18]. I have to admit that any martial art becomes deadly but shaolin kung fu is more efficient.
@BlackShinobiShozoku Yes, there is a possibility that the monks had better weapons and that they had better strategy. But it is also possible that its because shaolin kungfu is better since the general/strategist said that the shaolin monks were the best fighters. And using logic, 4 death and 100 death isnt the same amount of casualties and a simple explanation like: ''oh, their weapons were of better quality'' doesnt mean much.
@ProfessorOhms The main differences between Shaolin Monks and MMA fighters is that the Shaolin Monks dont make propaganda about how their art is deadly and that Shaolin Kung fu is actually a real martial art where as MMA, by definition, is a sport.
what really bothers me is that ive been taking TKD for 5 years an my friend took Kung fu for 5 years yet he is always arguing that TKD is just fancy kicks but i tell him that Kung Fu has fancy kicks too but the thing is they are both effective against an opponent
Check kung Fu Toa out , full contact style of kung fu. Founder of this style was Master Mirzaii who dedicated his life to martial art, he spent so many years of his life in china and did so many dofferent styles, Kung Fu Toa is fast, powerful and
beautiful to watch. meditation is also big part of this beautiful Art. Most TKD guys in Iran did Toa along side TKD, that's why Iran has been TKD world champ for so many years on and off.
the guy in the orange is a shaolin monk, is he is not supposed to hurt the TKD guy he didn't hit him on purpose. he is a MONK. he fights for self defense.
Are you stupid or what , in martial art you are not supposed to do any competition, Shaolin Monk use the traditional Kung Fu for self defence not for competition like fighting a TKD , A real monk will not do a competition , and a real tkd or kung fu or karate TRADITIONAL will fight for self defence only . There is a big difference between MMA (sport with competition) and Kung Fu or an other martial art (ART , SELF DEFENCE, health conditioning) So please S T F U u are the retarded here !
Give us an example. All tkd nerds bitch that "they're not a rEAL MASTER LOLZ" well, who the fuck is a real master? I can show you great boxers, kickboxer, wrestlers, ect, who would beat the shit out of 99.999% of TKD "masters" on the planet.
it's not that tkd is ineffective people just use it wrong. if you use tkd in the same aggressive manner as muay thai fighters and don't try to be flashy it is very effective. A lot of fighters who come from tkd and point sparring just aren't used to being hit hard, once you get past that they are great fighters.
Karate is no match for shaolin kung fu. There is Kung fu, and maybe karate can beat some kung fu. But karate can not beat SHAOLIN kung fu. The monk in this vid looks as if he can kill the guy in 2 seconds lol, looks like he's either going easy or he just sucks lulll, watch some shaolin kung fu sometimes, my friend =]
Karate and Kung Fu are both great styles but I gotta agree with this one Kung Fu is based on real life self defence and Karate is based mostly on competition, it their on par in a competition then I would have to say the Monk could kill the other guy in seconds real life, he waz holding back because he was not aloud to hit any vital organs or finishing blows
theres SOOOOOOO much of kung fu styles and techniques :) u can't say kung fu focuses more on defence. This guy focus on defence but some kung fu style almost only attack. Like jeet kune do...
In actuality, the shaolin fighting style isn't too great but the actual training itself is. It isn't the style that makes the fighter, it is the fighter itself. This means a boxer can beat a shaolin fighter if the boxer had tactics, speed and strength as well as stamina. Do not worry, I know well enough how powerful shaolin can be if it is in the hands of a great fighter, I know way to much >.>
My family tends to have one fighter in each branch down. I am the fighter for this gen.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this is just a show. martial arts are not necessarily for ass whooping.
anderson silva will destroy both of these martial artists for example - and he is far from the mastery of these two. he is a fighter, whereas these guys are artists.
Whehe, You've never heard of true shaolin power didnt you? The shaolin is no show, not like the taekondo practicers and etc.
This is the 1 fight of a real shaolin not even doing his best.And this is the result. MAN, why do you think the shaolin monks do not fight for show? They're too strong. they train iron skills and 8 hours a day! C'mon man!
shaolin kung fu i heard uses chi . they run it through the body in order to be supurb to almost any attack .who ever knows shaolin kung fu can wup anyones ass
yeah that monk could read all the movement by the tkd fighter but if we only see this clip the way how to know whos the winner is to see the last clip.. if the referee let that monk finish his movement, its gonna be different story mate.. hahaha
doesnt anyone else find this video just a practice routine type of thing? look at how the orange guy magically taps the guys leg and they go back down...anyone not fooled by their flying flashy kicks besides me?
I agree. This was a point sparring match at best, and a demonstration at worst. I know everyone says the guy in the orange won, but the reality is that neither of them did any damage. Their defense consisted of running away, and that was pretty much the "fight": One guy charges in with a bunch of kicks, the other guy runs out of the ring. In the kung-fu guy's case, he also used some unecessary blocks and jumps, like at 1:48 when he put his nuts in the path of fire.
wtf are u on about you fucking bell end go and suck your dad off and when he has finished unloading his salty cargo on your rag head go and learn how to construct a sentence that makes sense now fuck right off
amazin shit i ever seen shaolin is the best
zarofpker 3 months ago
that must have been so frustrating for the taekwondo fighter, he couldn't even touch the shaolin fighter because he blocked every single strike =P
epit0me 7 months ago
tkd guy was so close to getting knocked the fuck out.
nov1505 9 months ago
i did some research on this video. this monk is 32nd generation of shaolin. his birth name is wang deqing(王德庆） and he got a given name shi xinghong(释行鸿）by shaolin. he study kongfu in shaolin since he was 9 years old and leave shaolin when he was 25.
in 1999, he went to Hungary to teach kongfu.
now he is the teacher of police force in Hungary and he is asked to write a test book about martial arts for the police force of Hungary
paolohou 11 months ago 6
i have to say they both good. but i want to bet 200 bucks on the monk. Don't blame the video quality, at least we know kungfu can still kick ass.
paolohou 11 months ago
My toaster records better than this...
Splattboy1 11 months ago
wow this monk is the first real martial artist i've seen on youtube hah
not bad this video does NOT suck
ThisReallySuckz 1 year ago
@ThisReallySuckz besides bruce lee and a couple other like ehsan shafiq and andy hug. i have to agree
goldenhawk101 1 year ago
fuck this video is 100 years ago
3000carriers 1 year ago
@3000carriers as old as you
VizzeOne 1 year ago
va ninguno de los dos se pego!!!!!!!!!!! por que ??? los dos retroceden como mamitas al ataque del otro. cuando uno retrocede asi seguro que el otro no te va a pegar pero lo seguro es que vos tampoco cuando quieras contraatacar . por eso se corta el ataque enemigo para meter el mio!!
frannckopz 1 year ago
monk vs bruce lee =D
123lebz 1 year ago
@123lebz monk would win bruce lee is a good martial artist and performer nothing more he wouldnt last against this monk or a cage fight
criminalmindgames 1 year ago
@criminalmindgames bruce lee was the best fighter in the world... when he died everything changed..
123lebz 1 year ago
@123lebz bruce lee was the best fighter in the world??? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA OMG you pathetic go suck his dick then lol hows his ass look? thats so ignorant to call one man the best fighter lol he never really fought anybody except punk americans who thought they knew how to fight and beat up people in movies that is all, if he were to get in the ring or cage today these guys today would destroy him=)
criminalmindgames 1 year ago
@123lebz not the best- nobody is the best. God hasnt made some better n some bader humas. but i like bruce also like many other. he had just a strong will. n ''will can make u nearly invinvible. but will alone is not enough ;)
yeko1993 1 year ago
@criminalmindgames UMM NO MATE!! go get a life you fken kid
123lebz 1 year ago
shitty video quality. still a good fight
REDSCOUT3 1 year ago
Here is the background,
Shaolin was performing or sth in Korea, and the korean asked them to fight as a request. Shaolin had no other means but to accept.
And then the abbot of Shaolin told the fighter (Deqing Wang) to obey the Taekwondo rules, not to attack with hands and not to hurt the opponent. Also asked him to try to performance for audiences.
That's why the monk didn't attack too much. Don't u think the monk didnt try his best?
Bleakhand 1 year ago 10
@Bleakhand thx a lot. i wish one day i can watch the whole video
paolohou 11 months ago
This demo is incredible. The comments are hilarious. Get a room guys.
jacksawild 1 year ago
its not the fightstyle what makes the winner, its the fighter :)
yeko1993 1 year ago
@yeko1993 exactly you could know every martial art in the world but if you dont have heart and right mind youll never win if you cant conquer yourselff
criminalmindgames 1 year ago
@criminalmindgames Right! ^^ think the same way.
yeko1993 1 year ago
@yeko1993 yeah but all these retards got their head so far up bruce lees ass they will never see, hes not a fighter lol
criminalmindgames 1 year ago
@criminalmindgames xDD
yeko1993 1 year ago
O M G meeting that shaoling monk when he is pissed would be probably last thing in my file :D
houbapl 1 year ago
did he die?
manhenk 1 year ago
@manhenk
no
ohAlanho 1 year ago
When fighting your stand should be firm. i dont like tkd because focuses too much on kicks. Its flashy but when you are kicking, a low sweep kick will take you out easily
AnjuABCDE 1 year ago
@AnjuABCDE
You know sweep kicks are not allowed in TKD^^
Sehnji123 1 year ago
@AnjuABCDE not if it's a jumping kick
HelloIAmDaniel 1 year ago
Weapons, Strategy, And etc. Unarmed combat knowledge is a plus. Our Military has been out done in unarmed before and has still won many wars.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
Women are very flexible.But at one point the bone cannot be hyperextended without being broken or pulled out of socket. Flexibility increases range of motion which the muscles will allow. But if a Joint can't go the other way..... Well it can't go the other way.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
@BlackShinobiShozoku Well, the thing is that ''tongzigong'' allows far more range than it is conceivable. if we applied the exercise on a normal person, i think he'd be badly injured and he would be injured if you applied a sort of lock. But with extreme flexibility, the fighter will escape from ur grasp before u completely control him, that is of course, if you ever get this chance before u get killed.
bozanism 1 year ago
@bozanism Do you think Jujutsuka are not flexible?
We have techniques that can be nullified by better flexbility. Of course.(Ex. kubi hishigi)
Doesn't really hinder much... Just move on the techniques that actually pull joints out of socket or hyper extend a joint. Which doesn't matter how flexible you are. And being flexible doesn't stop us from controlling. Our control comes from our pins and positioning. Which gives us leverage to control you.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
@BlackShinobiShozoku Well, good luck at pinning us.
bozanism 1 year ago
@bozanism
I don't need luck it's what i'm trained to do. And it's extremely easy to do against someone who doesn't know how to escape.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
@bozanism It will probably look like this. /watch?v=JjK0g-cDJI4
But that's Brazillian Jiu Jitsu. I'm Traditional JuJutsu. I would use a throw preferably to a double leg takedown. So our takedowns are much harsher.
But the result would be the same. We would establish control. Even though that guy was very flexible. And make them helpless. And we can choose to Choke, Break, Restrain, or Punish.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
very bad graphic
Mrchomikdiesel 2 years ago
The Shaolin has some great moves look at 1:47 ... pretty sick blocking a kick with a jump :D
galliance 2 years ago
scheisse man, habt ihr gesehen wie dieser kung fu kämpfer die tritte abwehrt??
schade dass die qualität etwas schwach ist
95Hadi 2 years ago
kung fu masters rlz
malko2mc 2 years ago
that monk fucking owns
realword27 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
somebody know is it fake?
genius1617 2 years ago
автор где звук то и че такое отстойное качество видео
burum23 2 years ago
if that video is real i swear that tkd dude is pretty good, nd by the way its not karate that is taekwondo
IIVI0RTAL 2 years ago
yes he is
fvaletudo06 2 years ago
imagen horrivel :@ ¬¬
lawbrow 2 years ago
Oh and send me a video! Oh wait there wont be any time for grabbing video cameras...
The proof will be two people walking around, one with a flattened face and the other with a high pitched voice and no eyes!
ApesHaveNoTails 2 years ago
Lol seventeen posts of mindless arguement about what martial art is better in a street fight by two people who have no dictionary to look up street fight... Really... One claims to know a bit o ground and pound. The other claims to know a bit o poke the eyes and rip da ball sacks. I think they both need to go fight on the street and see who wins! Most likely there will be great take downs, fancy flying kicks and a whole lotta eyes and ballz layin around! It will be epic! ... Fail
ApesHaveNoTails 2 years ago 2
u a funny guy ha ha
beegenius 2 years ago
im a comedian for a day job and a street fighter at night :P beh!!!!!!!
ApesHaveNoTails 2 years ago
Man, the monk don't even blink!!!
Impressive!
marceloinvest 2 years ago
every1 stop arguing over the internet its kinda rediculous. just enjoy that the movie is on here god.
kajukenbo12321 2 years ago 11
ohhh yeah thats right i forgot its a cardinal sin to be on your back in the oh so dangerous street fight! amazing thing is well over half of street fights END UP ON THE GROUND. these traditional martial arts guys found it dishonorable to hit a man while hes down...yet they allow biting and eye gouging and low blows? weird? the gracies proved bjj was far superior to any of the striking martial arts. and mma guys have proved what works and what doesnt inside the cage.
foottothroat21 2 years ago
Even UFC has rules in a real fight try your jujitsu on a kungfu guy and he will pluck out your eyes or maybe rip off your ball sack. Thats reality. UFC just has less rules than boxing or k1. It is still not what would happen in a real life or death situation.
mjm1991nsx 2 years ago
i love how you guys make it seem like your dirty tactic are the be all and end all of a fight. like "yeah man id jut gouge your eye or punch you in the nutsack and id win" its not and never will be as easy as you say it will be. im sorry it just doesnt work like that. and why in fucks holy mothers name would you need to eye gouge someone or go for their balls? like listen to what youre saying here. you just admitted the only way you can win is by fighting like a girl...that sucks...
foottothroat21 2 years ago
But you're saying the only way MMA fighters could win is with a set list of rules. Ever see a UFC fight where a guy gets tagged real good? Yeah, he's done for a good 2 or 3 minutes. It's effective. Kung Fu isn't made for competition, it's made for self defense against multiple attackers, unlike BJJ. While you're doing a flying armbar someone else is gonna brain you with someone other than his fist. Different styles for different situations.
mckschs 2 years ago
"But you're saying the only way MMA fighters could win is with a set list of rules."
when did i say that? i just said that because they fight with rules there is nothing stoppping them from fighting with dirty tactics (which i think are stupid, gutless, moronic, cheap, dirty, and a retarded excuse for a "martial art") anymore then the last guy.
foottothroat21 2 years ago
But training for MMA means training based on a specific rule set. There's no reason for them to learn anything outside of what they can use in the octagon. And yes, martial arts do employ dirty tactics, because martial arts were developed in a time when your opponent was literally trying to kill you by any means necessary, and normally you were fighting more than 1 guy. But I guess you don't understand that because you've been a complete idiot so far about it.
mckschs 2 years ago
and what the fuck do you fucking train that is so fucking special? you think because you fucking have been told "how" to eye gouge and kick someone in the balls means you know everything about how to kick a guy whos trained bjj, wreslting, muay thai, boxing. this isnt anchient chinese temples were fighting in. a street fight is nothing more then dirty boxing and some grappling. christ mma guys have fought for years to prove they arent "street fighters" and here i am arguing it over the internet
foottothroat21 2 years ago
No, that's a planned bare knuckle boxing match. Ever see an MMA fighter get poked in the eye? You know why it happens? Because they don't train to protect against eye pokes, they train to protect against punches. As long as a fist isn't being throwing, they let hands real close. And in a real fight where someone is really trying to hurt you, or where you're dealing out GnP, they might go for an eye gouge. MMA is a SPORT. Kung Fu is SELF DEFENSE. There's a DIFFERENCE in those meanings.
mckschs 2 years ago
STOP overexxaggerting street fights. i am so fucking sick and tired of reading what a kung fu guys interpretation of a street fight is "blah blah youll get jumped by 3 guys and get stabbed and then get your eyes pulled out" im sorry but there are millions of street fight videos on youtube. you tell me how many have more then one attacker and weapins. barely any. its basically all 1 on 1 dirty boxing fights and some grappling and ground and pound. explain how mma training is non applicable?
foottothroat21 2 years ago
Wait wait. So you're telling me that you think an actual street fight is a premeditated event in which people have time to grab video cameras and shit? You are stupid. There's a difference between a street fight and a bare knuckle fight retard. A street fight is actually getting jumped by people. That's not over exaggerating. People having weapons isn't over exaggerating either. You're a complete moron if you think EVERY fight happens like it does for a Kimbo video. Even they have rules.
mckschs 2 years ago
oh my fucking god now youre changing around what your definition of a street fght is. SHUT THE FUCK UP AND PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT IM TELLING YOU. a street fight is nothing more then a fight with no rules. it doesnt even have to be on a street. can be in a hotel hallway. you cant go and change around the definition of what a "street fight" is now and think thats gunna win me over. fact of the matter is nowadays muay thai, boxing, jiu jitsu, wrestling, youre gunna need alot more....
foottothroat21 2 years ago
....then thinking you know how to eye poke and kick someone in the balls
foottothroat21 2 years ago
no when a mma guy gets poked in the eye its accidental from a fucked up punch he was going to block. all im saying is that just because the styles mma guys train with have rules in a cage DOES NOT mean they cant just as easily beat the fuck out of someone when they are allowed to fight as dirty as they want. muay thai, bjj, boxing you name it is just as effective in a street fight as knowing kung fu
foottothroat21 2 years ago
lol, that's because you don't know nunjutsu...
In nunjutsu the cool thing is that...
That is no dirty fighting... there is the victor and the defeated
saponavedi 2 years ago
@saponavedi
You obviously don't know "ninjutsu" either.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
I never changed any definition of a street fight. You tried to define a street fight, and I told you you were wrong. Videos online are always 1-on-1. There's people around to make sure if someone's hurt it gets taken care of. In spur of the moment situations where a no one has time to grab the video recorder, THAT MIGHT NOT BE THE CASE. You're stupid to think that every fight you see on the internet automatically translates to "this is how every fight goes down in real life".
mckschs 2 years ago
listen kid...most street fights end up on the ground. thats a fact look it up. truth is your cheapshots are not a deciding factor and will never work like portrayed in the movies. and i can guarantee youve never pulled someones eye out (and why youd need to is beyond me). the cage employs many different styles. all of which are much more practical in a real fight then this bullshit. just because there are rules to protect the fighters does not mean the styles they use arent better.....
foottothroat21 2 years ago
jiu jitsu is the most widely taught self defense art for the reason being most street fights (which you kung fu guys greatly overexaggerate to make your style seem more useful then it is) end up on the ground. BJJ and mma guys have beaten countless kung fu karate self defense idiots in lots of videos yet we still get excuse after excuse. truth is mma fighters are much more practical and well rounded then any of these guys and would easily wipe the floor with them in the "street" with no rules
foottothroat21 2 years ago
so what you people are saying is that this kung fu incorporates fancy non practical striking ,and cheap shots for "self defense"? so an mma fighter who has trained in all different styles of martial arts means his styles (which re much more practical and real world then this shit) would not be useful because somehow the only arts that work are the ones that incorporate cheapshots to win? so an mma fighter cant do them too? and from a better spot? IN MOUNT!
foottothroat21 2 years ago
@foottothroat21 MMA shots are effective for ring and cage fighting. In the streets, MMA isnt the best ''martial art''. In contrast, shaolin kungfu is a deadly-art.
bozanism 1 year ago
@bozanism
Dude stop lying.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
@BlackShinobiShozoku and what do you know? You've only seen the performance side of kungfu. And you've never been in a fight with a real kung fu fighter.
bozanism 1 year ago
@bozanism
Well I know that MMA is the best way to prove that you're good at unarmed combat without having to actually go out in maim someone. And obviously you don't realize that it doesn't take much to go that extra inch to maim someone. When someone is being tapped out by joint locking. It's because the hold isn't be applied in a manner where we're trying to break the arm. We're controlled enough to where we can decide whether to get a TAP or BREAK THEIR ARMS.
That is deadly.
ProfessorOhms 1 year ago
@ProfessorOhms No, MMA is good for ground fighting. Yes, of course you're controlled, you fight for fun and disses each other. And wait, I am hallucinating or is the Monk here holding back his powerful kicks? Then you pretend that breaking arms is deadly. Euh...excuse me but I swear I've seen someone with a white cast walking down the street. Oh, and what happened to Frank Shamrock? You should know about him since you know that much about MMA.
bozanism 1 year ago
@bozanism
MMA is a sport... not a style of fighting.
And it's not always fighting for fun. Some times it's more than that.
Powerful kicks? I rarely see bones being broken by kicks. And kicks are fully legal in MMA. Having the ability to break bones is very deadly. Do you think arm Joint locking is the only form of joint locking?
Once I break your arm at the joint it's disabled. Before or after I could do a neck crank and block your carotid for extended period of time.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
@BlackShinobiShozoku Well, take the example of Frank Shamrock who got kicked by Cung Le in a fight. Yes, joint lock is a powerful technique. However, thats if u succeed at locking down the opponent who doesnt strike ur neck or eyes-the weaker parts of a human body first. And if u dont believe me, the shaolin monks are pretty more flexible that im not sure ur joint locks will work. Watch ''tongzigong'', a sub-style of shaolin kungfu in which the practitioners become unbelievably flexible.
bozanism 1 year ago
@bozanism
Frank Shamrock took MANY kicks from Cung Le. Not just one.
And striking necks and eyes won't help you against a Jujutsuka. Once you're on the ground with a powerful throw(which will probably break something already). We grab full control over our opponent. Therefore you're being controlled and we grab dominant positions. And if we want to... We'll smack you on the back of the head like a drum for play, before we break every bone in your body.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
@BlackShinobiShozoku Well, Frank Shamrock ended up in hospital, not dead. what tells u that u will actually ever land a throw on us or before we strike ur temples, eyes, ears with a faint? Jujitsu is powerful for ground fighting, as i said before. But, it wouldnt be effective if the other fighter doesnt just throw punches with gloves and kicks and other attacks that will let u survive the hits so that u can resist and attack back.
bozanism 1 year ago
@bozanism
Because once we close the distance and easily take you down. Because you don't know any counters to takedowns or defend against grappling. Those "strikes" become nullified. Because then you'll be lending us your balance. You can strike my temples and ears all day at close range. It's not going to do much. Versus me being able to throw you into next tuesday.(Which you'll be lucky not to suffer broken ribs). Then completely nullify your deadly art on the ground.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
@bozanism
Frank Shamrock was told to stand up with Cung Le for one.
And for two Cung Le has wrestling background. Therefore he can change gameplan once hes on the ground and possibly survive/defend a takedown or make it to his feet.
Unless you have some knowledge about ground work. You won't last long in todays unarmed combat world. Unless it's two people who prefer to stand up and exchange strikes.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
@bozanism
So you're lying about saying arts used in MMA(which isn't a style) isn't best for streets.
And thinking Shaolin Kung Fu is some godly "deadly" art.
Trying to make it seem like knowing Kung Fu will make you be master at killing someone more than other arts. Or more prone to kill someone.
ProfessorOhms 1 year ago
@ProfessorOhms I didn't say that shaolin kung fu is a godly ''deadly'' art. Its only true that it is a deadly art. If you studied a bit of history, you will read that Shaolin Monks were once forced to join the army in order to fight off Japanese pirates. During a fight, 50 Monks fought against hundreds of Japanese warrior. The war ended this way: 4 monks casualties and a hundred or so Japanese warriors. If shaolin kung fu is a sort of joke or an art of show, would it kill so many people?
bozanism 1 year ago
@bozanism
Shaolin Monks weren't the only Monks in that war.
And furthermore it was due to having a very good strategic leader.
And it wasn't hundreds of Japanese warriors. Actually most of the Wokou were Chinese. There was equal number of Monks and Pirates. And it was around 120 for both sides.
This does nothing to prove Shaolin Kung Fu as deadly as contrast to other arts.
Any art can become deadly once you place weapons in their hands.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
@BlackShinobiShozoku Read this: The monks won their greatest victory at Wengjiagang.[18] On 21 July 1553, 120 warrior monks led by the Shaolin monk Tianyuan defeated a group of pirates and chased the survivors over ten days and twenty miles.[18] The pirates suffered over one hundred casualties and the monks only four.[18]. I have to admit that any martial art becomes deadly but shaolin kung fu is more efficient.
bozanism 1 year ago
@bozanism
That's not a big deal. That doesn't mean it's because the Monks Kung Fu them to death.
It just could mean
1)Better weapons
2)Better strategy
Where is proof shaolin kung fu is "more" efficient?
Because I guarantee you it's not.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
@BlackShinobiShozoku Yes, there is a possibility that the monks had better weapons and that they had better strategy. But it is also possible that its because shaolin kungfu is better since the general/strategist said that the shaolin monks were the best fighters. And using logic, 4 death and 100 death isnt the same amount of casualties and a simple explanation like: ''oh, their weapons were of better quality'' doesnt mean much.
bozanism 1 year ago
@bozanism
Yes it does.
That's why our current american military suffers extremely few causalities.
Versus the causalities of Pakistani/Afghanistan/Terrorist.
In war it usually does come down to weapons.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
@ProfessorOhms The main differences between Shaolin Monks and MMA fighters is that the Shaolin Monks dont make propaganda about how their art is deadly and that Shaolin Kung fu is actually a real martial art where as MMA, by definition, is a sport.
bozanism 1 year ago
@bozanism
Correct MMA is a sport.
MMA fighters are trained in real martial arts... that can be deadly as well.
BlackShinobiShozoku 1 year ago
what really bothers me is that ive been taking TKD for 5 years an my friend took Kung fu for 5 years yet he is always arguing that TKD is just fancy kicks but i tell him that Kung Fu has fancy kicks too but the thing is they are both effective against an opponent
Phil3Pill 2 years ago
Check kung Fu Toa out , full contact style of kung fu. Founder of this style was Master Mirzaii who dedicated his life to martial art, he spent so many years of his life in china and did so many dofferent styles, Kung Fu Toa is fast, powerful and
beautiful to watch. meditation is also big part of this beautiful Art. Most TKD guys in Iran did Toa along side TKD, that's why Iran has been TKD world champ for so many years on and off.
zartosht1969 2 years ago
Great video. I will be greatful if u post other videos of TKD vs KUNGFU. Thanx 4 this 1.
Taimoor1989 2 years ago
i dont think it's a real shaolin monk because real traditional kung fu is not competitive it's an ART
shoosh6666 2 years ago 4
An art if one chooses or the ultimate weapon in case of defense.
UltimateEnd0 2 years ago 3
ShaoLin monks used Kung Fu to defend there monasteries from bandits. You are thinking of Wushu.
APolishWingedHussar 2 years ago 15
I agree...Shaolin Kung Fu is not meant for competition, it is meant for defense of the self and others.
trier4952 2 years ago
there aren't any real shaolin monks
risingsun08107 2 years ago
the guy in the orange is a shaolin monk, is he is not supposed to hurt the TKD guy he didn't hit him on purpose. he is a MONK. he fights for self defense.
CabooseDaMan 2 years ago
wow,
i'm amazed at ur retardness.
its a competition,
they wouldn't come out just to defend.
hsk8787 2 years ago
omg i DID NOT write that, ok? it was my brother using my account.
CabooseDaMan 2 years ago
Are you stupid or what , in martial art you are not supposed to do any competition, Shaolin Monk use the traditional Kung Fu for self defence not for competition like fighting a TKD , A real monk will not do a competition , and a real tkd or kung fu or karate TRADITIONAL will fight for self defence only . There is a big difference between MMA (sport with competition) and Kung Fu or an other martial art (ART , SELF DEFENCE, health conditioning) So please S T F U u are the retarded here !
shoosh6666 2 years ago
BTW i'm talking to you hsk8787
shoosh6666 2 years ago
@shoosh6666 hahaha, true true
bozanism 1 year ago
wow that shaolin guys defence is amazing...
xWiggiex 2 years ago
holy crap.his defence was awesome
sklutten110 2 years ago
dont fuck wit a ShaoLin monk lol
ein15 2 years ago 5
to say it on this way the movie sucks it has to be many years old ...
torkill2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You should see a real tae kwon do master. These guys are weak.
F2133232 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Give us an example. All tkd nerds bitch that "they're not a rEAL MASTER LOLZ" well, who the fuck is a real master? I can show you great boxers, kickboxer, wrestlers, ect, who would beat the shit out of 99.999% of TKD "masters" on the planet.
chiconspiricy 2 years ago
Nerds bitch?
HAHAHHAHA.
F2133232 2 years ago
So, no masters you can name? That's what I thought.
chiconspiricy 2 years ago
PWAHAHAHAHAA, HAHAHAHAHAA.
F2133232 2 years ago
it's not that tkd is ineffective people just use it wrong. if you use tkd in the same aggressive manner as muay thai fighters and don't try to be flashy it is very effective. A lot of fighters who come from tkd and point sparring just aren't used to being hit hard, once you get past that they are great fighters.
GingerSkate7 2 years ago
Comment removed
O8COGC 2 years ago
Karate is no match for shaolin kung fu. There is Kung fu, and maybe karate can beat some kung fu. But karate can not beat SHAOLIN kung fu. The monk in this vid looks as if he can kill the guy in 2 seconds lol, looks like he's either going easy or he just sucks lulll, watch some shaolin kung fu sometimes, my friend =]
KuvHmoobNas 2 years ago 4
Karate and Kung Fu are both great styles but I gotta agree with this one Kung Fu is based on real life self defence and Karate is based mostly on competition, it their on par in a competition then I would have to say the Monk could kill the other guy in seconds real life, he waz holding back because he was not aloud to hit any vital organs or finishing blows
ShadowStormDX 2 years ago 3
this shaolin fighter is not that good, but still see what he does.
Kung Fu focuses more on defence
zagpe1 2 years ago
theres SOOOOOOO much of kung fu styles and techniques :) u can't say kung fu focuses more on defence. This guy focus on defence but some kung fu style almost only attack. Like jeet kune do...
spupapi 2 years ago 2
lol not that good?? funny how sooo many ppl on youtube are kung fu, karate etc masters....
whitewidow777 2 years ago
One style can never beat the other.
It is that one fighter that beats the other.
SugoiKnuckle 2 years ago 6
FInnally someone makes some sense on this matter
chumptump 2 years ago
I dont think so
mctitskfu it depends on the fighters, im a Black Belt Taekwondo fighter and i've sparred with many kung fu fighters who could'nt dominate me!
elpolloloco626 2 years ago
black belt im so scared. dont you have friends or a tv to do something other in your freetime?
wowtest14 2 years ago
no need to lie.
fvaletudo06 2 years ago
He's not lying. Getting a black belt in Taekwondo is funking easy. You can get one in 5 years if you try hard. IMO Taekwondo is a pansie martial art.
zx1357 2 years ago 3
i wasn't talking about that part, I was talking about the kung fu fighters. But in away it is true. if your good at what you do.
fvaletudo06 2 years ago
were they shaolin monks? probably not.....tae kwon gay stands no chance
mctitskfu 2 years ago 3
In actuality, the shaolin fighting style isn't too great but the actual training itself is. It isn't the style that makes the fighter, it is the fighter itself. This means a boxer can beat a shaolin fighter if the boxer had tactics, speed and strength as well as stamina. Do not worry, I know well enough how powerful shaolin can be if it is in the hands of a great fighter, I know way to much >.>
My family tends to have one fighter in each branch down. I am the fighter for this gen.
renjixsan 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. Take your middle finger and put it on your nose.
2. Say the name of someone you like
3. That person will ask you out or say they love you tomorrow.
4. Heres the thing; copy and paste it to two other videos
lastfirefighter 2 years ago
These shaolin monks are too strong they have an extremely hard training
glrbrasil 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is just a show. martial arts are not necessarily for ass whooping.
anderson silva will destroy both of these martial artists for example - and he is far from the mastery of these two. he is a fighter, whereas these guys are artists.
vindicator2008 2 years ago
I'd like to see Silva try to last against Bruce Lee or Tony Jaa even. Trust me dude, you are way off base with that one.
281knlib 2 years ago
Anyone can beat up Bruce Lee. He's dead.
MasterDragonNinja 2 years ago
lmao
sslsnake652 2 years ago
until his zombie woops your ass
kirbzftw 2 years ago
Silva is a faggot.
calleford 2 years ago 3
no he isnt
66Money66 2 years ago
Whehe, You've never heard of true shaolin power didnt you? The shaolin is no show, not like the taekondo practicers and etc.
This is the 1 fight of a real shaolin not even doing his best.And this is the result. MAN, why do you think the shaolin monks do not fight for show? They're too strong. they train iron skills and 8 hours a day! C'mon man!
saidadib 2 years ago 4
This is only sparring, if this were a real fight, kung fu would absolutely dominate
mctitskfu 2 years ago 2
shaolin
fvaletudo06 2 years ago 2
shaolin kung fu i heard uses chi . they run it through the body in order to be supurb to almost any attack .who ever knows shaolin kung fu can wup anyones ass
bigbdawg13 2 years ago
Comment removed
SilentRaeth 2 years ago
nice
ziwang 2 years ago
why did you put thumbs down on jstyloo its true what he said damn it
einalem007 2 years ago
praying mantis :))
Rikimaru915 2 years ago
what is better shaolin kung fu or tkd
MMRR1996 3 years ago
I think shaolin has more fights with art, and protecting.. You see the shaolin fighter is blocking every kick
jstyloo 2 years ago
yeah that monk could read all the movement by the tkd fighter but if we only see this clip the way how to know whos the winner is to see the last clip.. if the referee let that monk finish his movement, its gonna be different story mate.. hahaha
dikajennifer 2 years ago
There isn't an answer to that.
GingerSkate7 2 years ago
doesnt anyone else find this video just a practice routine type of thing? look at how the orange guy magically taps the guys leg and they go back down...anyone not fooled by their flying flashy kicks besides me?
foodib115 3 years ago
I agree. This was a point sparring match at best, and a demonstration at worst. I know everyone says the guy in the orange won, but the reality is that neither of them did any damage. Their defense consisted of running away, and that was pretty much the "fight": One guy charges in with a bunch of kicks, the other guy runs out of the ring. In the kung-fu guy's case, he also used some unecessary blocks and jumps, like at 1:48 when he put his nuts in the path of fire.
Theyellowma 2 years ago
Is that taekwondo or karate?
chinolocoxto 3 years ago
its shaolin and TKD
haloman123123 3 years ago
is the monk using bagua?
Booblablahblah2 3 years ago
no, snake style
joecrazydirt 3 years ago 2
search for "shaolin frog style". that's so funny. but tbh, i practise nothern shaolin, so don't think, that i am a hater xD
Cornerless 3 years ago
Pfft anyone in there prime couldnt touch this guy in the yellow in there best fight. Good luck.
chappy45111 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what a load of old shit ,ballet dancing motherfuckers
wallopnuts 3 years ago
they could kill u instantly
Wallopnuts: What a load of ballet dancing mother fuckers
Shaolin master: dont insult
wallopnuts: o yea? Kicks like a sissy*
shaolin master: grabs *SNAP*
wallopnuts: *crys*
asianboi1004 3 years ago
wtf are u on about you fucking bell end go and suck your dad off and when he has finished unloading his salty cargo on your rag head go and learn how to construct a sentence that makes sense now fuck right off
wallopnuts 3 years ago
i understood it
u must be retarded..
FrozLiam 3 years ago 4
sorry i dont argue with girls
wallopnuts 3 years ago
yh.. wow amazing comeback.. dick -.-
since wen did LIAM become a girls name..
and if u think this is shit y watch it in the first place..
if u dont like it click off it.
there's no point in posting argumentative comments on a video u dont like cos u wont win.
every1 else who watched this probly liked it. and the ppl that didn't just probly clicked off of it.
and btw ''ballet dancing motherfuckers''
stop tryin to hide the fact that u do ballet u pussy
FrozLiam 3 years ago 6