911 The Pentagon Witnesses (Part 3 of 4)

[sleonardelli]

There was an E-4B (a.k.a. ghost plane) there that day but I assume it didn't get the comms necessary to indicate this was going to happen or that the defense system could respond quickly enough. There had been a Patriot battery there at one time but for some reason (I don't recall) it was not there on this day. Had it been, it may have engaged but there is other "collateral" damage to consider. I have researched both sides of this topic and still stand tall on the debunkers!

[realistromeo]

bumper to bumper traffic, and they only had 120 witnesses? no overturned cars (from the tremendous 500mph wake....no downded trees..you know the ones that would have blocked the view of some witnesses,and the lamp posts would have been FLUNG TO HIGH HEAVEN! 500MPH! they would be found right near the pentagons wall pimp daddy! THINK it would take less than 1/2 a second from the time they were cliped to the time the plane hit the pentagon..wings remained functional after hiting lamp posts? huh?

[SlimeBuster]

realistromeo -- You played too many video games.

[realistromeo]

From the government sponsored re-enactments i might as well have played video games, they seem to think that is proof? allongside the now abandoned pancake theory! The heart of AMERICAN DEFENSE was incapable of stopping this plane from hitting and in addition have 5 frames of video to show for it?........lol nice to know american taxpayers are getting their moneys worth....

[SlimeBuster]

realistromeo -- How many pages of the 911 report did you read?.. Let me answer for you.. ZERO

Your comments prove you are just a puppet, and listen to a bunch of losers instead of using your own brain. The collapse was called "progressive" not a pancake. The security camera took one frame per second... with a jet traveling almost 500 MPH, what did you expect to see, the highjackers waving at you?

[realistromeo]

You are correct i have not read the 9/11 report..maybe i will go to a library to read up....you must remember the NOVA pancake theory that ignored the core..you seen it buddy.

But this is the PENTYGONE they even knew a plane was comming toward them 20 minutes beforehand.. only 2-3 camera footage NO NO DISCERNABLE PLANE!..FOR THE TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS of dollars the american public has dished out to the military THEY SHOULD HAVE HAD BETTER CAMERA SECURITY Penty hit was a joke

[jeffmay1]

You act like we had fighter jets and warships and guys on the ground with a shoulder fired rocket launchers ready to shoot down hijacked jets precisely on 9/11 at 8 am, like we knew it was coming

Did you forget that pre-9/11, terrorists had never flown a jet (like a missile) into a building? Were you really ready for that to happen on 9/11? Were you sitting at home saying, "Damn I saw that coming!" No, IT HAD NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE

And is that all you care about? Better pictures for you?

[realistromeo]

It never happened before true, but the USA KNEW that the twin towers were a target and had surmised and anticipated that an attack like this could "go down".

No one was ready except the players in the game...media,military and the political higher ups who would benefit from waging war.

Mall security has better cameras than the PANTYGONE...even the traffic cameras failed to capture this "PLANE" or anything resembling. the fbi set up shop at traffic control. perhaps to control traffic!!

[GreenVI]

realistromeo, prove it.

[realistromeo]

It was in a youtube video that i saw where some people were interviewing traffic control and they said that as soon as the attacks happened they took over the traffic control nerve center in that area setting up shop (this was durring-after the pentagon attack) obviously they had confiscated the tapes.

[wheelst]

For your info, the nova program you are talking about was an early estimate of how the buildings collapsed. Once NIST did their investigation they came up with the actual physics of the collapse. The official story is not the one on Nova, for the official story you need to read, start with the 9/11 commission report.

[jeffmay1]

ha, highjackers waving, i love it, too funny

[1americaforall]

realistromo...what are you 12 years old???  how ignorant are you?

[arkgunslinger]

The police officer interview is the same one the "Truthers" are always playing only the 15secs of where he talks about about people on 27 southbound would have their view blocked but, in the other direction they could have seen it and the "people on 395 had a great view".

[arkgunslinger]

Thanks for posting.

[lyden2006]

proof positive of 'blowback' 9/11 comission report even confirms it. ill give it a fair rating only on the basis that there is no attempt to portray gorillas and such hanging off the side of the building =)

[ArmchairRevolution]

Stop bouncing in between LIHOP and MIHOP please, it's weird.

[lyden2006]

Isn't letting it happen, also to help make it happen?

Example: from the P.O.V. of current foreign policy. If we LET Iran have a nuke, then we are MAKING future threats to the middle-east possible for what were letting them do NOW.

[ArmchairRevolution]

Ed Hudson is an idiot; planting the myth that somehow "oceans protect[ed] us". They never have! It is complete bullshit.

Thanks for these.

[Falco98]

Um.. huh? They very muchso did in WWII. I don't get your reasoning.

[ArmchairRevolution]

Look up Japanese occupation of Alaska.

Or the war of 1812.

Oceans never protected us.

[Falco98]

Sorry, you're taking the meaning of the statement completely out of context.

[ArmchairRevolution]

Oceans never protected us; I don't get your reasoning.

[Falco98]

Of course they did. Nobody ever claimed they kept us *completely* safe, but they've always served as a buffer that keep us reasonably safe from homeland attacks. Come off it.

[ArmchairRevolution]

If the two oceans protected us then they kept us completely safe, seeing as they protected us.

The talking point is not worth arguing over.

[lyden2006]

Falco go back to history class, and pay attention this time.