Haha funny thing, I've got a '67 parts car that basically got the same treatment as yours. It's undoubtedly a '67 car but has '68 fenders and a '68 grill setup. Funny what parts can be combined.
what bitch! ..i just asked was it a 390 cubic inch or 302 cubic inch since it is a 1967 mustang ..as a historian i know most of the stangs with the exeption of the shelby's in 1967 were either the gt 390 or the 302 . just asked a fuckin simple question waiting an answer from the poster of the vid ... fuckin bastard
That is true. It was in a front end wreck with a previous owner, has a '68 front end. But thats what made me not feel too bad about modding a classic, there really wasn't a whole lot of factory parts left on it by the time I got a hold of it.
How do you stroke a windsor so much? That's insane. Do you have a stroker kit? And I'm builiding up my 1966 coupe. It has a 302 and about 300 horse it's a mild setup. Is there anything I can do besides dumping money into a supercharger?
Yes, But it's extremely hard to keep it maintained. And I havnt ever seen a twin turbo classic mustang, because it ruins it. The mustangs didn't come with turbos back then and I want to keep mine original I was looking into a replica paxton shelby supercharger. But there's no way I'd put twins on it would be to gay.
yeah I agree with a classic muscle car the only FI you can go with is a supercharger but even that isnt a great idea. one should go for higher compression heads, a stroker, or a cam before considering going FI on a classic it just seems out of place.
Exactly, the shelbys came with paxtons from the factory I want to keep it as orginal as possible. By the way I'm getting a stroker crank, and I've got a cam but I have lower compression heads for my superchager set up, the higher compression is like straining the motor and you could warp stuff or even blow something, so I'm at 9.5:1 compression and blower pistons.
yeah bro im taking my 302 and i just bought new trickflo cylinder heads,4 barrel carb,edelbrock intake manifold performer edition,and i gonna change my compression ratio to about 10.8 to 11 to 1 and im trying to get 400 rwhp and its about 2500 dollars worth but im also taking my block to remachined and cleaned up in solvents and stuff my uncle is gonna help me do it within the next 3 to 4 weeks good luck on your car i have a 1969 coupe
If i was you, i would stroke it. also, thise heads better flow really good with a 300+cfms at 600 lift, a big roller cam (250+ .50 duration) and 650 or more lift with a super victor or a victor... and you will be around 500+hp to the crank
You can stroke a 302 to a 331 or a 347 (347s won't last you as long though.) I am probably going to help my friend out by stroking the 302 in his 67 to a 331, more reliable, more torque, and you can still rev the hell out of it.
ive owned a 65 a 67 and a 69 the frame geometry and strength sucks big time carroll shelby himself said we were sticking huge engines in rattraps back then....man he was right
which is why his cars, and all the Mustangs turned race cars since then, have had subframe connectors and roll cages welded in... as have almost al the muscle cars of the era
the windsor is a bad ass motor. I have a 408 stroker windsor in my 68. dude, they run like hell. It made 420rwhp on motor and 581 rwhp on spray. windsor is the best small block for lots of cubic inches and power!
Mustangs don't handle? You have a civic? Bring on your 1967 Civic and let's see it handle. Mustangs handled well enough to pretty much eradicate the SCCA competition of the day, and plenty of parts are available to bring them up to today's standards. Now, who cares how that civic handles when it is 5 miles behind when it gets to the corner?
Is that a 351-W or a 351-C in it, cause i have a 72 Mach with a built, bored and stroked 351-C to a 408, and from wat i know thats as far as you can go with a cleveland because of the coolant passages. In a Windsor I know it can be stroked far more thats why I am asking wat is in yours.
Mine is a Windsor. I've heard of people stroking Cleve's to the amount, but I've also heard it costs more and can have oiling problems. So I went for the Windsor.
american muscle are good drag cars but their handling kinda sucks, but thats my opinion I own a civic, 350Z, and a SS camaro(original power). I never really worked on them yet.
quote: their handling kinda sucks... I own a civic and a 350z
Haha! I'm sorry.... lol
I live in Texas. The roads are flat and straight, handling isn't an issue. The racing is done 1/4 mile at a time, and from stoplight to stoplight, where the muscle car is king.
Sorry. It was running rough and had a smaller cam with a worn out exhaust lobe that day. It made 347hp and 450lbs of torque at the rear wheels. Now it has a bigger cam and hits on all 8. Next time I'm hoping for 400hp and 500lbs of torqe.
OOOOOH i have a 67 mustang too. only its red. i am currently in the process of fixing it up. needs a new muffler, possibly a whole new exaust line, and i think the fuel pump. then some body work. mustangs are awesome.
Thats not true. If it's a GT, coupe/ fastback or convertible, it says GT or in my car's case GTA on the side at the bottom of each fender (among other places throughout the car)
No. It is true. Ford's Vin number log proves it. All cars in 1967 and '68 that were Gt's or GTA's are logged as having the sportsroof option. In non ford lingo, fastbacks. Anything other than that is aftermarket or cloned.
You're misinformed. I have a factory GTA Mustang. It's been documented by Ford and Kevin Marti. I have a Licensed by Ford document stating that my car is an actual GTA or for those not familiar with GTA's a GT with an automatic. It has an emblem, like all other GT's do on the lower half of the front fenders behind the wheel wells. Believe what you want, but I've been building Mustangs for a long time. You can believe it, or don't... either way... fastbacks were not the only real GT's.
I'll look into it further. However, I have never ever come across anything that would be considered hard evidence that suggests your idea to be true. But it is possible. Just like a '67 GT500 convertible, Very very very very rare.
If you really are interested, send me a private message and I will give you some links to check. You can give me your email address and I'll send you some pics of my car and other GT coupes and convertibles. They are kinda rare, but no more rare than a GT fastback... although there seems to be more of those on the road now than there was 10 years ago (clones/ fakes). Kinda like Shelbys.
I like them quite a bit. My knowledge on mustangs is limited when it come to rare types like the couple shelby that has the SAME tail lights as normal coupes. only 3 made I think...
The true definition of HORSEpower!
MrCleanPolo 4 months ago
0:36 Jesus...
stavivaven 9 months ago
right hand car?
fvboss429 9 months ago
Haha funny thing, I've got a '67 parts car that basically got the same treatment as yours. It's undoubtedly a '67 car but has '68 fenders and a '68 grill setup. Funny what parts can be combined.
hightower2011 9 months ago
There needs to be some video of this car...on the road...make it so number 2!
justcaleb 11 months ago
I fucking want that.
chaserr120 1 year ago
is this in Australia ?
lukeshytalker02 1 year ago
wheres my drool bucket
citydriver 1 year ago
It's actually a small block....
silverstanggt2007 2 years ago
Ignore those stupid comments from jealous people.......nice car and love that big block sound!
fanof3lisa 2 years ago
@fanof3lisa its a stroked small block dude ; )
lukeshytalker02 1 year ago
@lukeshytalker02 dude?
fanof3lisa 1 year ago
@fanof3lisa sorry are you a dudette ? lol
lukeshytalker02 1 year ago
@lukeshytalker02 Yes with the name Lisa, I am a dudette! It still has a big block sound though, doesn't it?
fanof3lisa 1 year ago
@fanof3lisa yeah i thought you were a dude that was a fan of a girl named lisa lol, and yes it sounds very badass
lukeshytalker02 1 year ago
@lukeshytalker02 fanof dale earnhardt lisa
fanof3lisa 1 year ago
@fanof3lisa yeah i missed the '3' lol
lukeshytalker02 1 year ago
@lukeshytalker02 tis ok!
fanof3lisa 1 year ago
nice car and a good sound! Pity that in Germany are not so many Mustangs....
harry10071966 2 years ago
what bitch! ..i just asked was it a 390 cubic inch or 302 cubic inch since it is a 1967 mustang ..as a historian i know most of the stangs with the exeption of the shelby's in 1967 were either the gt 390 or the 302 . just asked a fuckin simple question waiting an answer from the poster of the vid ... fuckin bastard
fashizze 2 years ago
Yeah I removed his comment. Its a 351w stroked to 408.
mustangduckk 2 years ago
@fashizze
I assume the guy didn't understand what you were asking fashizze, but yeah back then alot of them did come with 302's!
cooperray76 1 year ago
haha texas licence plate
xox945 2 years ago
OmG VTAK just kicked in y0!
I'm definitely a 4cyl/straight-6 kind of guy but god damn i love this sound
in the end there's never any replacement for good old-fashioned muscle cars
brw147 2 years ago
is that a 390 or 302
fashizze 2 years ago
what numbers did it put down?
cozzey05 2 years ago 5
Vtec!!!!!!
Adam44516 2 years ago
looks like a 1968
ononsual 2 years ago
67 and 68 are basicly the same and look alot alike, however notice the pretend rear 'brake vents' or whatever they're called
mustangduckk 2 years ago
the horse on the grill is 1968 not 1967
ononsual 2 years ago
That is true. It was in a front end wreck with a previous owner, has a '68 front end. But thats what made me not feel too bad about modding a classic, there really wasn't a whole lot of factory parts left on it by the time I got a hold of it.
mustangduckk 2 years ago
I modded my 67 from 200 ci to 351W. It also has the side vents like yours.
ononsual 2 years ago
@mustangduckk this version is a 57 due to the side vents being louvered and not scoop
BRAV0TWOZER0 8 months ago
i call them fake air thingys
wilbertm94 2 years ago
@ononsual its a 67 dude...look at the body not the grill..
68mustangcoupe1 1 year ago
this is a melody for my ears and temptation for my eyes... god I love that car
kajetanadamsamuel 3 years ago 7
that's right, me too ;]
Talibson 2 years ago
the older stangs I THINK are faster than the new ones
34D2234 3 years ago
They are not. That's sad but true.
oskii8888 2 years ago
Stock for stock, nope. But dollar for dollar they sure are, same with 5.0's..
mustangduckk 2 years ago
what are the #'s ?
minitsrule 3 years ago
damn i have this same car, only urs is better! Hands Down!
aimow123 3 years ago
fuk me i actually nutted one off to this vid at 0.38 secs, lol nice car m8
dude054321 3 years ago
beautiful that will rip ass open amazing
smilenowcrylater666 3 years ago
How do you stroke a windsor so much? That's insane. Do you have a stroker kit? And I'm builiding up my 1966 coupe. It has a 302 and about 300 horse it's a mild setup. Is there anything I can do besides dumping money into a supercharger?
Shifterkartsforlyfe 3 years ago
twin turbos
Domman56 3 years ago
Yes, But it's extremely hard to keep it maintained. And I havnt ever seen a twin turbo classic mustang, because it ruins it. The mustangs didn't come with turbos back then and I want to keep mine original I was looking into a replica paxton shelby supercharger. But there's no way I'd put twins on it would be to gay.
Shifterkartsforlyfe 3 years ago
yeah I agree with a classic muscle car the only FI you can go with is a supercharger but even that isnt a great idea. one should go for higher compression heads, a stroker, or a cam before considering going FI on a classic it just seems out of place.
68fastback123 3 years ago
Exactly, the shelbys came with paxtons from the factory I want to keep it as orginal as possible. By the way I'm getting a stroker crank, and I've got a cam but I have lower compression heads for my superchager set up, the higher compression is like straining the motor and you could warp stuff or even blow something, so I'm at 9.5:1 compression and blower pistons.
Shifterkartsforlyfe 3 years ago
shifter
yeah bro im taking my 302 and i just bought new trickflo cylinder heads,4 barrel carb,edelbrock intake manifold performer edition,and i gonna change my compression ratio to about 10.8 to 11 to 1 and im trying to get 400 rwhp and its about 2500 dollars worth but im also taking my block to remachined and cleaned up in solvents and stuff my uncle is gonna help me do it within the next 3 to 4 weeks good luck on your car i have a 1969 coupe
RyanSmith242 3 years ago
If i was you, i would stroke it. also, thise heads better flow really good with a 300+cfms at 600 lift, a big roller cam (250+ .50 duration) and 650 or more lift with a super victor or a victor... and you will be around 500+hp to the crank
408Sleeper 2 years ago
You can stroke a 302 to a 331 or a 347 (347s won't last you as long though.) I am probably going to help my friend out by stroking the 302 in his 67 to a 331, more reliable, more torque, and you can still rev the hell out of it.
1995Lightning 3 years ago
you can actually stroke and bore it to pretty much whatever you want under 355 or so. unless you get a kit, which can be easier.
Wojoray 3 years ago
that rumbling v8 id such an awesome sound, what is that high pitched whistle sound?
jasy87 3 years ago
whistly noise is air flowing into the carb.
mustangduckk 3 years ago
i think petrol pump
lilbHEMI 3 years ago
ive owned a 65 a 67 and a 69 the frame geometry and strength sucks big time carroll shelby himself said we were sticking huge engines in rattraps back then....man he was right
jeffandmissymello 3 years ago
which is why his cars, and all the Mustangs turned race cars since then, have had subframe connectors and roll cages welded in... as have almost al the muscle cars of the era
mustangduckk 3 years ago
for all of u people that think mustangs are wimpy this video will prove u wrong
67stang721 4 years ago
the windsor is a bad ass motor. I have a 408 stroker windsor in my 68. dude, they run like hell. It made 420rwhp on motor and 581 rwhp on spray. windsor is the best small block for lots of cubic inches and power!
408Sleeper 4 years ago
Mustangs don't handle? You have a civic? Bring on your 1967 Civic and let's see it handle. Mustangs handled well enough to pretty much eradicate the SCCA competition of the day, and plenty of parts are available to bring them up to today's standards. Now, who cares how that civic handles when it is 5 miles behind when it gets to the corner?
oldmusher 4 years ago
Is that a 351-W or a 351-C in it, cause i have a 72 Mach with a built, bored and stroked 351-C to a 408, and from wat i know thats as far as you can go with a cleveland because of the coolant passages. In a Windsor I know it can be stroked far more thats why I am asking wat is in yours.
Mach1isaac 4 years ago
Mine is a Windsor. I've heard of people stroking Cleve's to the amount, but I've also heard it costs more and can have oiling problems. So I went for the Windsor.
mustangduckk 4 years ago
cool.
Mach1isaac 4 years ago
siiiicckk man
jesuschristbitch 4 years ago
man that has to be the best looking muscle car around
verroch1234 4 years ago
good noise..lovely car
kevbielo 4 years ago 3
I got voted out of the neighborhood for starting a Ford like that. Now I get a rock when trick or treating.
default99telecom 4 years ago 2
huh
6650roger 4 years ago
lol nice dude
DTFILIPINO 4 years ago
nice dude. makes me want to fire up the 302 right now and piss off the neighbors.
brwilli6 4 years ago
american muscle are good drag cars but their handling kinda sucks, but thats my opinion I own a civic, 350Z, and a SS camaro(original power). I never really worked on them yet.
Numbah1Braddah 4 years ago
quote: their handling kinda sucks... I own a civic and a 350z
Haha! I'm sorry.... lol
I live in Texas. The roads are flat and straight, handling isn't an issue. The racing is done 1/4 mile at a time, and from stoplight to stoplight, where the muscle car is king.
mustangduckk 4 years ago
heeeeeeeeyyyyyyyyyyy never do ANYTHING to that SS or it can lose its value! =D
punk9999643 4 years ago
haha well it's only 42 years old!
Wojoray 2 years ago
In 67 the Japanese had their Toyota version of the VW Bug. To date they still can't match the fire power and good looks of American Muscle.
default99telecom 4 years ago
i tihnk i nutted in my shorts from the sound of this car
speedy650 4 years ago
blue 65 mustang,408, green parking pass hanging from the mirror? this car looks pretty familiar! Haha, can't wait until you get back David.
99LS1TransAm 4 years ago
he saıd" ıts got to be better..but stıll great"
biigron 4 years ago
daha ii olmalıydı.. ama yinede züper
UZUNERC 4 years ago
Anyone know what uzunerc said????
mustangduckk 4 years ago
harika / magnifique
siroccojam 4 years ago
at 0:45 sec nice
07havoc07 4 years ago
AMAZING!!! I have both a '68 GT Fastback and a '67 coupe, but as of now neither run. Can't wait though! Sweet ride man! Mustangs forever!
srouxd162 4 years ago
Cool!
Les
bigblockmustang 4 years ago
ive a got an 07 gt and thats the only car i would trade it for. your a lucky man.
CRoberts91 4 years ago
hell yes texas mustangs cant beat em!!
StupidLogInNames 4 years ago
I'll agree with the first poster, at 37 seconds.....WOW! sweet ride man!
captainrock2002 4 years ago
Rock on man! American horsepower all the way. Imports suck
DTLSinger 4 years ago
Sorry. It was running rough and had a smaller cam with a worn out exhaust lobe that day. It made 347hp and 450lbs of torque at the rear wheels. Now it has a bigger cam and hits on all 8. Next time I'm hoping for 400hp and 500lbs of torqe.
mustangduckk 4 years ago
If you're gonna post a dyno pull, at least give us the results
dukegnarley 4 years ago
American muscle! lol
Billykerr1991 4 years ago
OOOOOH i have a 67 mustang too. only its red. i am currently in the process of fixing it up. needs a new muffler, possibly a whole new exaust line, and i think the fuel pump. then some body work. mustangs are awesome.
baEaglei1 4 years ago
1967 ford mustang gt, that is my car!!
luketrials 5 years ago
It's not a GT. Only Fastbacks wore the GT logo in '67-'68. But still an awesome car. With that motor, it would outrun a stock GT.
srouxd162 4 years ago
Thats not true. If it's a GT, coupe/ fastback or convertible, it says GT or in my car's case GTA on the side at the bottom of each fender (among other places throughout the car)
RWinkler 4 years ago
No. It is true. Ford's Vin number log proves it. All cars in 1967 and '68 that were Gt's or GTA's are logged as having the sportsroof option. In non ford lingo, fastbacks. Anything other than that is aftermarket or cloned.
srouxd162 4 years ago
You're misinformed. I have a factory GTA Mustang. It's been documented by Ford and Kevin Marti. I have a Licensed by Ford document stating that my car is an actual GTA or for those not familiar with GTA's a GT with an automatic. It has an emblem, like all other GT's do on the lower half of the front fenders behind the wheel wells. Believe what you want, but I've been building Mustangs for a long time. You can believe it, or don't... either way... fastbacks were not the only real GT's.
RWinkler 4 years ago
I'll look into it further. However, I have never ever come across anything that would be considered hard evidence that suggests your idea to be true. But it is possible. Just like a '67 GT500 convertible, Very very very very rare.
srouxd162 4 years ago
If you really are interested, send me a private message and I will give you some links to check. You can give me your email address and I'll send you some pics of my car and other GT coupes and convertibles. They are kinda rare, but no more rare than a GT fastback... although there seems to be more of those on the road now than there was 10 years ago (clones/ fakes). Kinda like Shelbys.
RWinkler 4 years ago
weren't the california specials GTs? they weren't fastbacks right?
Wojoray 3 years ago
right
rawls3183 3 years ago
they did have the fender add on that fastbacks had
NextGenerationMovies 2 years ago
your right, that Mustang CS were coupes with a shelby look... but they are still nice cars though
408Sleeper 2 years ago
I like them quite a bit. My knowledge on mustangs is limited when it come to rare types like the couple shelby that has the SAME tail lights as normal coupes. only 3 made I think...
Wojoray 2 years ago
now this is sweet! id love to have that car!
stetchkov 5 years ago
holy shit dude that was awesome.
bonesdsm 5 years ago
what a sound my god i luv it i just listen to 00:37 its the best sound ever
LightningManiac 5 years ago