CO2 Science - Vulnerability to the IPCC Message

[JuanVoyce]

This "vulnerability theory" sounds unscientific.

[alienspacecentereast]

IPCC´s Rajendra K. Pachauri was forced to admit the claim about Himalayan glaciers had no basis in observable scientific fact. I really just don´t understand why people still support IPCC´s obvious fraud and I don´t understand why people accept, that only one side of the climate debate is allowed..? Democracy and objectivity is suddenly a bad thing..?

[JuanVoyce]

@alienspacecentereast

What did he/she claim? I'm here to learn what I can, not pass judgement.

[glebedigital]

Mr Lindzen that's so bang-on.. Thank you! Go sensible science, go! :)

[highhorse313]

They're blinding us with science - who among us can stand up to that? But the truth is out there about our environment and you don't have to be a PhD to understand that burning fossil fuels is not a good thing.

[NostraquedeoTX]

Platitude.

More CO2 is good for Plants to breath.

I'm all for larger crop yields so we can feed more people.

Or do you want people to starve?

It's uncaring people like you who would walk past your fellow man without caring for them at all.

Emotion, it can take you to the silliest places.

How about we discuss facts.

[highhorse313]

With your up-front insults and unfounded accusations you sound like a crazy person. We're not discussing anything jerk.

[m1aws]

@highhorse313 The Carbon from fossil fuels came originally from the atmosphere. Our plants have to comb the atmosphere for their meagre share of 380ppm CO2. Yet, we as animals can breathe 20% oxygen.

Lets not stop there! All the chalk and limestone in the world? All from CO2 which used to be in the atmosphere.

AGW is a blatant lie to make fools of you and tax your fuels.