Great video up until the "how can creationists explain" part just after 6 minutes. That's the argument they always try to pin on us. Well, how do you explain XYZ? Their magic can be used to explain anything they want it to, but it can't make testable predictions.
It is true to a certain extent that we did originate from apes but how do you explain how humans came with the ability to speak? Apes don't have the same ability to speak as humans do.. This is another missing link that NO scientists have been able to proof. It is this speech gene called FOXP2 that makes us unique and evolution cannot explain this change..
actually, new discoveries say that in human DNA there are several missing links that make us not monkeys, these are muscles in the Jaw that you see in gorillas such as in 3.53 massive jaw structure. By the age of 10 the scull plates would have fused together with such powerful jaws, this means that without this the monkeys or gorillas can not eat usual food and must adapt, basically we formed from a mutation, think about it
I'm going to go and destroy every evolution video if I have to. There is none evidence for evolution this all is a hoaz. All the evidence ths video gives are lies! I'm a creationist of the bible and anyone who wants to challenge me can do so. There is no evidence for this theory and I will pick it all apart.
@NorthCitySider Actually its down to about 3 percent. Well 3-5 but to give you a benefit of the doubt. That does nothing for evolution. This s because when you look at how many different nucleotides we have the number is huge. Don't have the exact number one me but I can get it. Plus the real problem s a change of 3 nucleotides is fatal to a species. So no possibility of change. All the missing linke fossils are proven wrong. And only 3 nucl... There is hundred of thousands diff.
@thinkagainism The most convincing proof of evolution doesn't come in the form of any one piece of evidence - it comes from the overwhelming number of pieces of evidence that all support the theory.
DNA, countless fossils, new understanding of geology, meteorite finds, ice cores, coral analysis, about 50,000 new species discovered and analysed every year for the past 150 years and, surprise, surprise all the data support evolution.
@fingleur1 I can tear all of them apart but I want to start with ice cores. Show me how they help evolution. Old earth or what. Age of the earth is important but how do they help evolution.
@thinkagainism Several reasons. As you say Ice cores provide valuable data to apply to the huge array of data we have to use when aging the earth, but ice cores also contain pollen and fungal spore DNA and mineral and radiometric traces than can be correlated against minerals and decay signatures in fossil remains.
@fingleur1 Ice cores don't prove anything for an old but it is a young earth anyway. Those aren't yearly rings they are warm, cold, warm ,cold. In the 1990's they uncovered a plane that crashed in greenland under ice cores. It crashed there in the 1940's. So in about roughly 50 years there was hundreds of thousnads of rings over it. So the rings can't date to show old earth. Plus the deepest they've ever found of feet of ice based on rates dated only to 2,000 years.
@fingleur1 That plane proves it takes half a century and considering how many there are less than 50 years to from hundreds of thousands of layers. No such things as ice core dating. It is warm, cold, warm, cold that forms them. It is could be a few years and you have a hundred or 500 who knows. Those aren't annual rings. There is nothing that shows old earth. Everything young. 11 million years ago the earth would be touching the sun. It is shrinking 5 feet per hour so in the past..
@thinkagainism It was bigger. 1 million years ago or around then it was twice as big. Based on helium depletion rates from zircon crystals and how much helium is in the atmosphere the earth is 6,000. There are many factors that limit the age of the earth. I know like around 40 of them. So how does DNA prove evolution. That is the most complex molecule in the universe only showing design.
LOL deny evolution, deny atmoic bomb and power with that one. Sorry but if you are going to claim they got the age of the erath wrong,t hen they know nothing about atomic decay and therefore theres no atomic bombs or power! YOU CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!
Also every scientific field contradicts the bible, engineering, maths, etc etc You dont deny everything they give you even tho you must!
@gorilla199uncensored Everything contradicts the bible. You better be carfeul with that one your wrong. The biblical flood is the most scientifcally proven thing from the flood. Yes global flood. Ask me any question you don't get about a global flood. How do you explain literally hundreds of arceological discoveries that have proven critics wrong and the bible right. The bible is backed by excavations and not one contradict. How do you explain that.
" The biblical flood is the most scientifcally proven thing from the flood."
LOL DISPROVEN WITH DNA.
Not that anyone with half a brain 200 years thought it was real. Thats why every greta university in the world says its a myth IT DIDNT HAPPEN!
Bible having some real place names in it doesnt make the magic real. It also doesnt prove every frield of science wrong as they all prove the bible wrong. The bible is wrong, thats why even majority of xtians accept this fact.
@fingleur1 The last part I don't know how that shows anything. That is just imagination and pure speculation. That doesn't show the Dna changes at all and it can't much or it is fatal to a species. It just takes 3 nucleotides. That isn't even close to 1 percent of DNA. So change can't happen.So that doesn't show the DNA changed nor any missing links are in the fossil record. If you find a couple of bones in the dirt all you know is that they died.
@fingleur1 You use the argument that ape dna and human proves common ancestry. No no change can ever happen in the dna more than 3 nucleotides which isn't even close to 1 percent of the dna. If 3 nucleotides changed then the species dies. It is fatal. So no DNA change can happen.
When they mapped the human genome and located the inactive DNA for tails (Which explain why somtimes people are born with fully functional tails) your whole argument fails!
So another lie from you? LOL
Is pretending the baby slaughtering god of the bible is real that important to you?
@gorilla199uncensored First off what your referring to goes away after either a few weeks or months. Secondly it isn't even a tail it swells back up to nothing. It is a birth problem. That thing can't be a tale because it isn't even connected to the spine. Plus to believe tale you need to believe in a vestigal talebone. That is a lie it isn't. It is great design. It has 9 muscles attached to it that support digestive release. Without it your doomed. It also supports the ..
@thinkagainism Supports the colon. It is also just like another bone of the spine at the bottom. Take away that tale bone you'll have serious problems in hours. There is no tale that no human has. It isn't connected to the spin, has no tissue of nothing and swells back up in not long and has to do with birht effects. Besides why would we lose a tail. No other animal does. Doesn't make sense.
@fingleur1 you gave animals that don't have a tail. Ok..., show me one that loses one. They never use to have one. It has never been observed that they lossed a tail. That is neve observed anywhere. Animals that have one don't lose it that is ever observed so why would we if we did have one.
@thinkagainism All of the apes' ancestors used to have a tail. We share a close common ancestor with all the apes so all of these animals' ancestors used to have a tail too.
The Barbary macaque has no tail but it's not an ape - it lost its tail independently. The Manx cat also has no tail. Tail loss mutation is also seen in several other species.
Many domesticated animals like the pig have had their tails reduced to virtually nothing through artificial selection.
@thinkagainism If your ancestors lived up trees then a tail would confer them a fitness advantage. Once they came down out of the trees like the apes (and like the cats as well as it happens) - the tail no longer confers an advantage.
@fingleur1 First off why would we come down from trees. Why not stay where your adapted to. Why not adapt even better to trees. Why would a lion become civilized from the wild. Doesn't make sense. You can't prove nor was it ever observed that we had an ancester from a tree or that we came down from one. Where are you getting this from. Why does it appeal to you. We came down from a tree. That was never observed and the whole tail thing doesn't make sense either.
@thinkagainism The farmers who've bred pigs to make their tails smaller and smaller will have observed it. Also the spontaneous tail loss caused by the Manx tail gene is witnessed.
But so what if nobody witnessed it. Lots of things happen without us seeing them happen - it's our job to play detective and work out that happened and why.
@fingleur1 Ya and the things that happened without us seeing them we don't know of. See we don't know about what we don't know about. That is not our job at all. Our job is to go off what we can observe and test. Why would I believe about some speculation that is totally unconsistent from source to source and half of it is made up and was not observe. Do you hear yourslef. Everyday things happen in China and I don't see it. Okay... Also the pig tail your talking about is not.....
@thinkagainism is not what happens in nature. Not natural selection its human selection. Besides look what your talking about to proove your thoery. A pig tail that we bread is suppose to be evidence for us coming from non life and all matter from nothing. And that all things have a common ancester. Give me real evidence I'm listening. What else you got. Tails being lossed that aren't observed is not evoluiton. Vestigal organs, missing links, geologic coulmn anything you know.
@thinkagainism But we so test things in the here and now. We make a hypothesis that all life has a common ancestor. We ask ourselves, what would the world look like, and what evidence would we expect to find if we are to uphold that hypothesis.
We do those tests and make those observations here and now - it's real science. Just happens you don't want to hear the answers.
@thinkagainism You come home and find your front door kicked in, your cupboards ransacked and half your stuff missing.
You weren't there to witness it - do you examine the facts and the evidence and conclude that, even though you weren't there to see it happen - you were actually burgled. Or do like you're trying to do with evolution - just go LA LA LA LA - not listening?
@fingleur1 I agree with that. Now give me evidence that life evolved on its own and it wasn't created by an inteligent first cause. Ponder that and really think about that....
Also give evidence you haven't. You tried ice corest but that didn't work. The best you have right now to prove life made itself is that we had a tail. ....
No evidence has supported that and how a tail can show life made itself isn't evidence for that. Bring that into a cour of law. Give me other evidence.
@thinkagainism The inactive DNA and all the pseudogenes you have is only a small part of the modern evidence of evolution.
We understand very well the process of cellular respiration and even the fundamental process of glycosis contains the ancestral highly inefficient energy extraction steps of anaerobic fermentation.
Early life on earth evolved in an oxygen-free environment, that's why. The evidence of evolution is all around you - from your cells, to your goose bumps.
@fingleur1 There is nothing in DNA that is evidence for evolution. That thing is so complex how could you explain that coming from non life. DNA made itslef along with proteins amino acids and RNA. The ribsomes. That all made itself. Why would you choose to believe that? I'll ask you a question what is the odds of all that along with everything else happening and that needs to happen for life to evolve on its own. What are the odds?
@fingleur1 There was never an oxygen free enviroment. There never could have been that is what evolutionists won't tell you about or lie. In rocks we find oxygen about 50 % more in the lowest rocks in the geologic coulmn. Plus in other rocks deep in the surface we find in amber bubbles that have 35 to 50 % more oxygen. The earth always did and used to have more. Plust one of the key gases is ammonia. If no oxygen no ozone and no ozone uv lights will destroy ammonia....
@fingleur1 My reply to the oxygen this is the second so see the other first. Plus they need hydrogen because they say there has to be water vapor but a process that rips that up is uv light rays will come in and seperate the hydrogen from the oxygen that makes water vapor. The hydrogen that is split will be to light of gas and slip out of the atmosphere and oxygen stays. If there is oxygen it will oxidize and destory ammino acids so there always was oxygen which would destory life.
@thinkagainism I'm talking about older than 2.5 Billion years ago! To find high concentrations of oxygen in bubbles in amber will hardly tell you what the atmosphere was like before the evolution of plant life, will it?
We see little or no banded iron formation or red bed formations prior to about 2.3bya plus isotopes of sulphur in deposits prior to 2.3 bya don't show significant oxidation.
@fingleur1 I have a question. Will get back to the science in a little bit. I happen to have a question though. You said the odds are small so why do you choose to believe it happened that way? If the odds are way agasint you and totally illogical by all probability why do you believe it happened that way? Please explain that because it doesn't make sense to me. There are to choses to believe about the world- either someone made it or no one made it.
@thinkagainism It doesn't matter how small the odds are - all the evidence we have points to a single common ancestor and evolution. The odds of that happening could approach zero and that wouldn't change any of the evidence. Abiogenesis and evolution would still be the only candidate.
It's an event that only needs to have happened once in 13 billion years on just one of trillions of planets for us to end up discussing it.
@fingleur1 I have another question. A termite eats wood and can't digest it. It has little criters inside the intestines to digest it. Neither can live without the other and couldn't have came into existence without the other which evolved first. How did the brain evolve or the eyes, heart etc. It all has to be there at once. Can't evolve. DNA needs life for that molecule to exist and life needs it to exist which evolved first? Stars need the elements and elements need the stars.
@fingleur1 There is none evidence for evolution. Absolutly zero. You said it doesn't matter if the odds are zero you said you would believe it. There is no evidence give me some. You haven't given me any yet. In your next reply give me some evidence. The blood clotting system has the right design stop stop the bleeding process from a cut but at the right amount to not clott to kill you how did that evolve. It had to be there all at once.
@fingleur1 Now why did you say serious scientists. I know that answer to that but anyway, so what your telling me is that your not basing you conclusion and what you think. Your not thinking for yourself but if a scientist says so then it is right. Your basing it on what they think. The first part was wrong anyway. Every branch of science was started by a creationist and of the bible. Chew on that one for a while. You still believe everything came from nothing and life from non life.
@fingleur1 Just think about that. You said the odds doesn't matter. Maybe your not looking at the evidence but have a presupposition. You believe life came from non life what? Everything came from nothing. Either somebody made the earth or no one made it. Why would you choose to believe that no one made it and it made itself? How can there be any evidence for that? Give me some evidence in your next reply because I've never seen any.
"Give me some evidence in your next reply because I've never seen any."
You are the one claiming your imaginary friend did it, so its up to you to provide evidence. But theres none offcourse because it wants you to believe for no reason (FAITH) just like every other god! or it will punish you after death JUST LIEK EVERY OTHER GOD! instead of rewarding you after death JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER GOD!
@gorilla199uncensored That is a loaded reply so I don't no where to start but I'll try. okay, The god of the bible doesn't want you to believe for no reason. You need faith but not blind faith. No matter the evidence it still takes faith because I can't see god or wasn't there when jesus was here. So faith is believeing based on the evidence of what is not seeing. I don't know where you got that from the bible that you have no reason to believe. Jesus question people....
@thinkagainism To my first reply Jesus question a guy who believed for a simple reason. John 1:50 and the next few verses. There is a lot of good evidence that most people don't know that I am egar to give you but even without that it should be obvious that there is a god. How did everything come into existence. Someone made it. You rather believe nothing made it. Explain that. I think that calls for more evidence because that is beyond the obvious. I won't shy to give evidence..
@thinkagainism But I won't give the evidence till the right time. We have to work through these points first. Imaginary friend? I didn't make him up. No christian did. The bible did. Again it is obvious there is a god because nothing can't make anything. Punishing you after death? How much eaiser does it get than someone dying for your wrong and all you have to do is say and mean it I believe and poof eternal life. You can't beat a deal like that. So anyway before I give you my...
@thinkagainism Before I give you scientific evidence explain to me THREE THINGS. How nothing makes something and how it isn't logical and evidence enough for you to see all the stars and the universe and all the nature and creation on earth and conclude someone made it. Doesn't make sense if something is made that someone made it not nothing.
@thinkagainism "Before I give you scientific evidence" Great I didnt know there was a scientific theory of your god or any god! Or even any peer reviewed articles. "How nothing makes something" Science doenst claim that SO STOP LYING PLEASE! "creation on earth and conclude someone made it" Why someone? Why not somthing? Do you think the world is 600 years old as yoru bible says? How did your god get the bible so wrong? THATS NOT MUCH OF GOD!
@gorilla199uncensored You never responded to one of my lasts reply's about symbiotic relationships and all the other stuff. Reply to all of those points please. There is no scientific story to yours. To not believe in a god you have to believe everything came from nothing and life from non life. Still doesn't make sense. "Why not something" Because whatever posses the power and knowledge to do this is someone. Has to be or it is nothing, what you believe for some reason.
@thinkagainism Yes I believe the earth is 6000 years old. I know like 50 limiting factors and is probably my best area of apologetics. Earth has to be young. I still don't get why you don't believe in a creative force (god) because then nothing made everything. Non life made life. Explain it.
@gorilla199 How do you explain arceological discoveries that proof the bible true. Hundreds. We know who wrote the and who there to. Who they are true is adressed everytime. We know who wrote the gospels. That is a historical debate we can get into if you want. How do you explain hundreds of arceological discoveries that proov the bible true? It is strong evidence the bible is accurate in what it sais. I'll give you example after example of excavations if you want.
@thinkagainism "How do you explain arceological discoveries that proof the bible true. " Theres none for JJesus existing It beign a goid It did magic It created the universe. Science does disprove The cretaion myth. The tower of bable The ark/flood fairy tale "We know who wrote the Bible" LOL Really care to care to explain this lie, so I can get to the Bible 101 lesson for you/ "We know who wrote the gospels." NO Or who the stories where about.
@thinkagainism "symbiotic relationships and all the other stuff" What points? LOL "To not believe in a god you have to believe everything came from nothing and life from non life." LOL NO HOW STUPID OF YOU "believe everything came from nothing" THTS YOUR STUPID BASELESS BELIEF NOT WHAT SCIENCE PROVES! ""Why not something" Because" Because insert basless belief here......... Trees cant grow from seeds it by magic!
@gorilla199 You still didn't answer my last question. Out of everything there is possible to know do you think you even know 1% of it? just answer that. It is realevant.
@thinkagainism "I don't know how to reply unless you answer it." "Out of everything there is possible to know do you think you even know 1% of it?" OH good argument. This means it possible you are a pedofile as I dont know otherwise. Lets see what science PROVES IT disproves Ceartion myth Flood/ark fairy tale Tower of Bable fairy tale. Every field of science proves the bible wrong. Now make your basless plead.
Theres none for JJesus existing It being a god, It did magic, It created the universe.
IS THERE?
Science does disprove The cretaion myth. The tower of bable The ark/flood fairy tale "We know who wrote the Bible" LOL Really care to care to explain this lie, so I can get to the Bible 101 lesson for you/ "We know who wrote the gospels." NO Or who the stories where about.
@gorilla199 Yes there is historical evidence about who wrote the bible. All the gospels were written by first hand accounts and in the same generation of his death. Paul in his letters calims to be so serious and claims so many times he isn't lying and sais to have met Jesus on the road to damascus. So what led you to conclude that he was lying. Doesn't make sense does it. I have a question for you. Of every single thing there is to know do you think you know 1 % of it?
@thinkagainism "istorical evidence about who wrote the bible" We have no idea Who wrote the gospels Who the gospels are about. We know who paul is a person who never met jesus. CORERECT? "Paul in his letters calims " WOW so any writting it claims something LOL let me geuss this only applys to your baseless belief this doent apply to anything else? "met Jesus" READ YOUR STORY BOOK VISION VISION VISION "I have a question" Nice - The plead from ignorance!
@gorilla199uncensored Better yet why don't you explain how we got DNA without and inteligent sender. Explain to me how DNA made itself and why you believe that.
@thinkagainism "how we got DNA without and inteligent sender." WOW moce begging the question and plead from ignorance! Like to explain how we got your god if I didnt invent it? "Explain to me how DNA made itself" LOL thanks for demonsatrating your ignorance but we already knew. Ill pretend im a totally ignornat fool just like you. Science doesnt exists, it hasnt proven anything. NOW PROVIDE EVIDNECE YOUR GOD EXISTS IT DID IT LOL YOU WONT BECUASE? THERE IS NONE!
@gorilla199uncensored So basically what your telling me is a tail prooves there isn't a god and that we came from nothing. That is your logice. But yes you are wrong no human has a tail never been seen. Plus I don't know why it even matters at all. So if someone did have a tail who cares. That shows there is no god. What your talking about doesn't even connect to the spine otherwise there would be another bone and ther isn't.
"So basically what your telling me is a tail prooves there isn't a god "
Proves your creation myth of the bible false, also every field of science proves th ebible wrong in many ways.
"But yes you are wrong no human has a tail never been seen."
LOL LIES OR JUST IGNORANCE?
Go google the answer, theres a couple of dozen papers written by surgeons who have removed them. SO THEY DO EXIST! (BTW other ignornat fundies have dumb excuses so they know thye exist aswell :)
@gorilla199uncensored So you go to google which anyone who is anything can put up there what they want. Yo type of few words into google and if a human has a tail and google says so then you say there isn't a god and life made itself. Do you see what you are saying. What kind of logic is that. It in no way shows there isn't a god. A tail shows that. I want to debate your logice right now. Plus you do a little search on google and conclude your right. Just listen to that.
@gorilla199uncensored How do you explain areceological discoeries that proove the bible right. Hundreds of them have been found. That means it is accurate. I could give you evidence only if you give me a chance and are willing to hear it.
@gorilla199uncensored I want to prove the bible is right and accurate with what it says. There has been hundreds literaly, of discoveries and excavations that prove the bible to be right. It's not just evidence. They've found digs that prove events, dates, titles, and many other things. If the bible is right every time when it says in the beggining god then I trust its right if everything else shows it to be right.
@gorilla199uncensored You believe you came from a rock. That takes a lot of faith. That's the evolution theory. In my next comment I'll give you evidence to prove the bible true. In the mean time explain to me how nothing created everything and life came from non life and why you chose to believe that. Also I'm going to provide evidence to prove the bible right at the same time you've shown me no evidence to prove the bible wrong.
@thinkagainism "In my next comment I'll give you evidence to prove the bible true." No net comment let alone evidence for the bible being 100% true, which I have been asking for several messages! LOL "nothing created everything" Why do you say it was nothing, Why do you say it was cretaed PROVIDE EVIDENCE THIS IS THE CASE (OR READ A BASIC SCIENCE BOOK) "life came from non life" Magic pixies did it, not your god. "prove the bible wrong." LOL its up to you to prove it right!
@gorilla199uncensored IF you want my evidence it is a lot. Could you give me your e-mail and I can send you a good reply. That way I can type a good reply efficiently
@gorilla199uncensored I do. I have a lot of evidence that will take some time to discuss but to go over this amount I need your e-mail other wise I can't give much of it in detail but only in broad terms because the replys on this are limited. So to get a good and detail reply as many other replys I can give I need your e-mail.
@gorilla199uncensored Yes and a lot more than that. Lots of evidence. I've researched this my self because I question blind faith so I searched and grew closer to god. James chapter 4 verse 8-draw near to god and he will draw near to you. I think that is the reference. But yes I have all the evidence we'll need to discuss but what your looking for takes longer replys so if you could give me your e-mail and we can do an e-mail debate so I have room for longer replys.
@thinkagainism "Yes and a lot more than that" Is that all from Bible Your delusions Pleads from ignorance? Do you have any read evidence? " I think that is the reference." Do you have the references for the 6000 year old world, thats teh shape of a bowl/plate, that doesnt moveth, that sits on pillars and will last forever? How do you explain that being wrong int he bible? Also the bible getting the creation myth wrong? The flood and tower being fairytales?
@thinkagainism I don't see how you can't fit the answers one at a time if your proof is so clear. I think you need the extra space just for prancing around the subject without touching it.
Also, if your evidence is so overwhelming, why do you waste time on youtube comments when you can just write a real scientific paper about it and have it peer-reviewed? Will give you a whole lot of space too.
@thinkagainism If you can prove any of it(as the first person in history), you will be very rich and probably be awarded nobel prices and whatnot..so go for it now, hehe! : )
@thinkagainism Sorry - I don't think there's any point discussing these issues with you. You think you're doing research but you're not and I've seen no evidence that you are interested in genuine honest inquiry.
Throwing in the Bush reference just makes you look like a dick. I agree with you about evolution, but pissing me off about politics is no way to get me interested in your video. Looks like you're the stupid one.
For people who have brain, i invite you to watch this video: "Stem Cells & the Nephilim - Chuck Missler - 1 6.avi". Indeed, people with brain are few. winners are few.
God created the world from literally nothing. This is impossible to understand, but this is the truth. Math agree with this. everything else is self-contradiction.
This retarded are so ignorants bks of their beliefs, that they dont understand laws, definitions, and maths. Obvious, they come from chance. One single example? e.g: Monkey, what is the answer of this: 1/0 ? This is too much for them. Evolutionist = Retarded.
not science. Science is debating this matter. We believe this by faith.
God created the world from literally nothing.
3) It's imposible for the universe to be always existing because of the laws it is governed in.
Evolution, theory of homosexuals, and family's haters. Religion with no support in science. Target. The New world order. No God is allowed, but men. Satan governs the world.
Creation, Religion with strong support in science. Target. God is the ruler, no man.
Evolution is a joke easy to note, but unfortunatelly believed by many. Why? Many like to be ignorants. All the time i spoke to evo-, they self-contradict their own words, and they dont notice that.
truth:
1)Abiogenesis the core of evolution, never happend, the law of abiogenesis states that life comes only from life, why do we need to go forward?. why to explain every wrong of that fairy tale.
2) the universe had an absolute beginning in the past, this is religion, not
@xchris1800 "Evolution is a joke easy to note, but unfortunatelly believed by many. Why? "
I think you'll find it's because these people have had something called "education". They've looked at the "facts" and come to the sensible conclusion that evolution offers the only possible explanation for the variety of life on earth.
Science, history, math, chemistry, bible, all of them speak of a Creator, that's why i like knowledge, real knowledge come from intelligence, real human science perceive intelligence, knowledge from the source. What is the fact about reproduction of species? one species produce always its own species. this is a law, it never changes. Fact, no fairly tale. God the Designer of each species. A religion hidden in science is not science. Science comes from Intelligence. Science testify God. Obvious.
Every retard and ignorant believe in evolution lies, intelligent people believe in intelligence as Designer-Creator, that means God, I know now by evidence that losers are increasing, and winners are diminishing. 99 percent of science history belongs to God's believers scientist, this evo-parasites are taken control of science with religious-political purpose now. what a sadness.
@xchris1800 Your use of grammar is definitely in need of some evolution. Learn the proper use of the English language before you try to post some nonsensical argument. Intelligent people believe in what is scientific fact, not fairy tale. Religion and deities were made up by man to explain the unexplainable before science was widespread.
Christ' Hitchens' books aren't hoisted to the top by free-market forces. There's no great hue & cry by the public for what he produces. His books fit the agenda of the tax-funded public library system which ALWAYS champions books & films that promote degeneracy, Marxism and ruination. One needs only to read a local paper to see that the slant of every feature favors cultural Marxism: collectivism, aborticide, internationalism, sacred victims' groups, thought-crime laws & Earth worship.
I think somebody has to wash his mouth first before start speaking, Can we imagine how dirty is his mind? it's logical right? A dirty mind cannot think well.
@fingleur1 you dont want to go to hell, then you prefer to believe in evolution as fact, idiot, it changes nothing, hell exists and you will go there unless you repent.
@xchris1800 I've decided I'm not going to Hell thanks.
If your celestial coward of a God wants to communicate to me directly why and how he's going to send me to hell, then fair enough. I'll listen to the organ grinder but why should I listen to what his monkey says?
@xchris1800 Hell doesn't exist! Have you ever seen it? You live your life based on the IDEAS of other men and not REALITY who's the idiot?
OMG a "The End is Nigh" Christian. How many of you have there been over the course of the past 1000 years? The end is always nigh, but it just never comes, does it. Oh how the Lord doth tarry.
I think you need a more detailed video to shut these fucking morons up. and I agree with achilles, the U.S. is becoming a backward reatarded country because of people denying obvious facts like these, open a Webster Dictionary and look up the fucking definition of THEORY, then slap yourself.
@metalfaced0om I don't believe in religion. I use the word believe ironically. I think people take religion too literally there. It should be taken as stories that teach morals, like Aesop's fables, and no more believeable. Evolution is not taken literally enough! Religious people demand evidence for evolution like one thing evolving. Individuals don't evolve; populations do. Where's the evidence of God? The bible doesn't count. Am I less retarded than the average American?
To an evolutionist you cannot ask him what is good or bad, bks for him everthing evolves, what is good today maybe is bad tomorrow or what is bad today maybe is good tomorrow.
However if you ask a Jew/Christian the same question, he will give you the answer that gave you long ago, bks long ago till today they say the Earth is young and God created the world in six days.
is There overwhelming proof that the Earth is young, and Dinos and men lived together? Yes.
When it comes to evolution vs creation debate, what creationists do is start poking holes in evolutionary theory OR take well know established scientific facts and twist them. Why do they do that? Well because they can't provide evidence for creation.
@OptimalElement " Well because they can't provide evidence for creation." Evidence for something that is no repeatible is not an obstacle, by the way what about physics? if you can prove time is eternal, the creation never happend. The evidence would be the concept of time.
When something is not testable, observable, predictable and does not yield same results then it is an obstacle. And creation is just that. Physicists know that Universe as well as space and time had a beginning and yes you can refer to it as creation. How it was initiated no one knows. We know it happened about 13 billion years ago. Abiogenesis didn't start until 4 billion years ago. Evolution didn't start until 3 billion years ago. Either way this creation is different from genesis
@OptimalElement "When something is not testable, observable, predictable and does not yield same results then it is an obstacle. And creation is just that." you are right, the same happens with Evolution, right? Creation happend one time in the past.
Remember your words "well know established scientific facts", and you didnt give the concept of time, just accepted that time had a beginning, that's not enough to deal the issue of creation. What are the scientific facts (1)
@OptimalElement we know about time? In based of that facts, how can we define Time?. if you dont investigate this, you cannot have an idea what was before time and trying to make a general definition of it.
"How it was initiated no one knows", do you accept history as science? History belong to science too, and the bible(history of the hebrews and humanity) tells us the answer. This book never lies.Test it.
"We know it happened about 13 billion years ago." Tell me which tools have(2)
@OptimalElement been used to get that measured please, and which kind of logic was used? I get around 6000 years.
"Abiogenesis didn't start until...years ago". Show me known established scientific facts of this. Get life from no-life, and remember "When something is not testable, observable, predictable and does not yield same results then it is an obstacle", And Abiogenes is just that, right?
"Evolution didn't start until 3 billion years ago." Show me known established (3)
@OptimalElement scientific facts of this. My friend, you have more faith than I, did you notice that?, look:
a) You dont know what is time, that is crucial, b)you dont know that we dont have any idea how old is The Earth until now, we have many ways to do so. c) Science cannot prove Abiogenesis ever happend, life comes from life can be proven true. d)Evolution is hold in abiogenesis, and there is no transitional forms. what we see is that long ago there were (4)
@OptimalElement more species than today, the tree of Darwin is in reverse in certain way. What is the problem accepting God's Theory as the origin of Life? Ask your questions. (5)
The fossils are the ancestors of current species. Some species hit evolutionary dead end because they were unable to adapt to their environment. Those that survived adapted to their environment and diversified into separate species because each population over time found itself in different environment. To truly understand how this happens you need a degree in zoology which takes 4 years to complete.
I leave God theory to simple minded, because unfortunately the world is not that simple
Amazing facts!!!, why am i not convinced at all, May I say the cat and the lion had a common ancestor? Evolunist would say yes, Creationist would say no, and I say this is not evidence. I believe in God, it is logical. There is no evidence of evolution, there are group of animals with similarities, that study has its name, and it was a christian who elaborate that idea. No evidence, then Creation remains as stronger theory and religion, Evolution weak theory-religion.
@gorilla199uncensored surely you are a gorila that became human, and call me creatard who has been created by God, please cut your inactive tail off since it is inactive, are you ready?
@gorilla199uncensored "Yes humans have inactive DNA for tails" my ignorant friend, i cannot have any intelligent conversation with you because i can translate like this you words: "Yes humans have inactive INFORMATION for tails", we belong to different worlds. If we both want to have a conversation, we must start from the beginning of this, that meas definitions of what we talk. Bye. However if you want to speak define what is DNA in terms of information.
@xchris1800 you are not convinced because you are wilfully ignorant of the overwhelming evidence for evolution. If given a choice between wilful ignorance and stupidty I would choose stupidity every time, because at least I would have an excuse for appearing stupid.
@uknowispeaksense "overwhelming evidence for evolution." Oh yes many evidence, like the similarity of human skull/hand with gorilas skull/hand as example, I wonder why the father of taxonomy never thought of that, even though evolution as pagan-religion existed long ago before Darwin. Read his life.
@j919or lol! i didnt type 'vague terms' it just is all over your head. You might as well stick with your simple bible stories because the science is beyond your comprehension. so sad.
Evolution is a theory that is not observable, reproducable and it fails every test. Start with the length of time necessary. There is abundant proof that the earth is younger than 10k years and your radiometric proof is based on many assumptions and is inconsistent. IOW evolution is a forced theory. Why do u force it? Cuz you have nothing else except to submit to your creator and ur arrogance is too thick.
@j919or Nobody 'observes' a theory. Do you know what a theory is? You can't 'reproduce' a theory either. All the evidence so far makes me think you're talking total bollocks. 'scuse the French.
@j919or No, that's Intelligent Falling. The divine noodly appendages of his holiness the Flying Spaghetti Monster are pushing objects towards the ground.
There is much proof for Jesus as God come in the flesh. There is more proof that God is not material and that u spaghetti monster reflects ur own insanity.
@j919or The theory of evolution says that there is variation of form, there is inheritance and there is differential survival and reproduction between forms.
You havent done anything but type some vague terms. I have a problem with ur own ignorance. You havent even begun to approach the flaws in evolution and the flaws in ur own warped mind. You are evil, playing God and thinking that in any way you care about truth and not just survival.
@j919or The theory of gravity says that massive objects assert a force on each other proportional to the product of the masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The object is falling to the earth and the earth is falling towards the object.
What you think of as 'the theory of gravity' is actually your conceptualisation of the results of these assumptions which I presume you accept.
Blah blah blah. That theory is observable and repeatable. I can see it work and I can see it work over and over again without fail. Therefore its a theory that is fact. Evilution is only observable in adaptation which just proves the inherent info that the awesome creator revealed in Jesus Christ programmed into the genes.
Great video up until the "how can creationists explain" part just after 6 minutes. That's the argument they always try to pin on us. Well, how do you explain XYZ? Their magic can be used to explain anything they want it to, but it can't make testable predictions.
blurglide 1 day ago
''Oversimplified evidence for human evolution.''
oversimplify =to describe or explain something in such a simple way that it is no longer right or true
:D
esraretin 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is true to a certain extent that we did originate from apes but how do you explain how humans came with the ability to speak? Apes don't have the same ability to speak as humans do.. This is another missing link that NO scientists have been able to proof. It is this speech gene called FOXP2 that makes us unique and evolution cannot explain this change..
mikemiamionline 5 days ago
i don't like the music
MusicFoyreverh 2 weeks ago
actually, new discoveries say that in human DNA there are several missing links that make us not monkeys, these are muscles in the Jaw that you see in gorillas such as in 3.53 massive jaw structure. By the age of 10 the scull plates would have fused together with such powerful jaws, this means that without this the monkeys or gorillas can not eat usual food and must adapt, basically we formed from a mutation, think about it
mastergmoore 2 weeks ago
most creation scientists are frauds!
multisnootylives1 1 month ago
I'm going to go and destroy every evolution video if I have to. There is none evidence for evolution this all is a hoaz. All the evidence ths video gives are lies! I'm a creationist of the bible and anyone who wants to challenge me can do so. There is no evidence for this theory and I will pick it all apart.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism
I hope you're just a troll.
NorthCitySider 1 month ago
@NorthCitySider I'm not sure what you mean by that please tell me. Any evidence you have for evolution just give me one thing. Just one.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism
Humans share about 99% of their DNA with Chimpanzees. What about that?
NorthCitySider 1 month ago
@NorthCitySider Actually its down to about 3 percent. Well 3-5 but to give you a benefit of the doubt. That does nothing for evolution. This s because when you look at how many different nucleotides we have the number is huge. Don't have the exact number one me but I can get it. Plus the real problem s a change of 3 nucleotides is fatal to a species. So no possibility of change. All the missing linke fossils are proven wrong. And only 3 nucl... There is hundred of thousands diff.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism The most convincing proof of evolution doesn't come in the form of any one piece of evidence - it comes from the overwhelming number of pieces of evidence that all support the theory.
DNA, countless fossils, new understanding of geology, meteorite finds, ice cores, coral analysis, about 50,000 new species discovered and analysed every year for the past 150 years and, surprise, surprise all the data support evolution.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 How do ice cores help evolution. I don't think anyone of them help but how do ice cores help evolution.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@fingleur1 I can tear all of them apart but I want to start with ice cores. Show me how they help evolution. Old earth or what. Age of the earth is important but how do they help evolution.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism Several reasons. As you say Ice cores provide valuable data to apply to the huge array of data we have to use when aging the earth, but ice cores also contain pollen and fungal spore DNA and mineral and radiometric traces than can be correlated against minerals and decay signatures in fossil remains.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 Ice cores don't prove anything for an old but it is a young earth anyway. Those aren't yearly rings they are warm, cold, warm ,cold. In the 1990's they uncovered a plane that crashed in greenland under ice cores. It crashed there in the 1940's. So in about roughly 50 years there was hundreds of thousnads of rings over it. So the rings can't date to show old earth. Plus the deepest they've ever found of feet of ice based on rates dated only to 2,000 years.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism The Antarctic EPICA core extends back and provides data going back 800,000 years.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 That plane proves it takes half a century and considering how many there are less than 50 years to from hundreds of thousands of layers. No such things as ice core dating. It is warm, cold, warm, cold that forms them. It is could be a few years and you have a hundred or 500 who knows. Those aren't annual rings. There is nothing that shows old earth. Everything young. 11 million years ago the earth would be touching the sun. It is shrinking 5 feet per hour so in the past..
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism It was bigger. 1 million years ago or around then it was twice as big. Based on helium depletion rates from zircon crystals and how much helium is in the atmosphere the earth is 6,000. There are many factors that limit the age of the earth. I know like around 40 of them. So how does DNA prove evolution. That is the most complex molecule in the universe only showing design.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism
" the earth is 6,000"
LOL deny evolution, deny atmoic bomb and power with that one. Sorry but if you are going to claim they got the age of the erath wrong,t hen they know nothing about atomic decay and therefore theres no atomic bombs or power! YOU CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!
Also every scientific field contradicts the bible, engineering, maths, etc etc You dont deny everything they give you even tho you must!
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@gorilla199uncensored Everything contradicts the bible. You better be carfeul with that one your wrong. The biblical flood is the most scientifcally proven thing from the flood. Yes global flood. Ask me any question you don't get about a global flood. How do you explain literally hundreds of arceological discoveries that have proven critics wrong and the bible right. The bible is backed by excavations and not one contradict. How do you explain that.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thinkagainism
" The biblical flood is the most scientifcally proven thing from the flood."
LOL DISPROVEN WITH DNA.
Not that anyone with half a brain 200 years thought it was real. Thats why every greta university in the world says its a myth IT DIDNT HAPPEN!
Bible having some real place names in it doesnt make the magic real. It also doesnt prove every frield of science wrong as they all prove the bible wrong. The bible is wrong, thats why even majority of xtians accept this fact.
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@fingleur1 The last part I don't know how that shows anything. That is just imagination and pure speculation. That doesn't show the Dna changes at all and it can't much or it is fatal to a species. It just takes 3 nucleotides. That isn't even close to 1 percent of DNA. So change can't happen.So that doesn't show the DNA changed nor any missing links are in the fossil record. If you find a couple of bones in the dirt all you know is that they died.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism what do you mean by "It just takes 3 nucleotides"?
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 You use the argument that ape dna and human proves common ancestry. No no change can ever happen in the dna more than 3 nucleotides which isn't even close to 1 percent of the dna. If 3 nucleotides changed then the species dies. It is fatal. So no DNA change can happen.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism
"No no change can ever happen in the dna "
LOL the science illiterate fundy is talking about things it doesnt understand.
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@thinkagainism
When they mapped the human genome and located the inactive DNA for tails (Which explain why somtimes people are born with fully functional tails) your whole argument fails!
So another lie from you? LOL
Is pretending the baby slaughtering god of the bible is real that important to you?
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@gorilla199uncensored First off what your referring to goes away after either a few weeks or months. Secondly it isn't even a tail it swells back up to nothing. It is a birth problem. That thing can't be a tale because it isn't even connected to the spine. Plus to believe tale you need to believe in a vestigal talebone. That is a lie it isn't. It is great design. It has 9 muscles attached to it that support digestive release. Without it your doomed. It also supports the ..
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism Supports the colon. It is also just like another bone of the spine at the bottom. Take away that tale bone you'll have serious problems in hours. There is no tale that no human has. It isn't connected to the spin, has no tissue of nothing and swells back up in not long and has to do with birht effects. Besides why would we lose a tail. No other animal does. Doesn't make sense.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism
"No other animal does. "
All the other great apes for one thing.
"Doesn't make sense."
Sorry reality is reality no matter how dumb you make yourself, or are.
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@thinkagainism "why would we lose a tail. No other animal does"
Gorilla, Chimpanzee, Bonobo, Orangutan, Gibbon.
No, no other animal does, oh no.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 you gave animals that don't have a tail. Ok..., show me one that loses one. They never use to have one. It has never been observed that they lossed a tail. That is neve observed anywhere. Animals that have one don't lose it that is ever observed so why would we if we did have one.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism All of the apes' ancestors used to have a tail. We share a close common ancestor with all the apes so all of these animals' ancestors used to have a tail too.
The Barbary macaque has no tail but it's not an ape - it lost its tail independently. The Manx cat also has no tail. Tail loss mutation is also seen in several other species.
Many domesticated animals like the pig have had their tails reduced to virtually nothing through artificial selection.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 If they lost it through artifical selection why did they get one in the first place through selection.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism If your ancestors lived up trees then a tail would confer them a fitness advantage. Once they came down out of the trees like the apes (and like the cats as well as it happens) - the tail no longer confers an advantage.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 First off why would we come down from trees. Why not stay where your adapted to. Why not adapt even better to trees. Why would a lion become civilized from the wild. Doesn't make sense. You can't prove nor was it ever observed that we had an ancester from a tree or that we came down from one. Where are you getting this from. Why does it appeal to you. We came down from a tree. That was never observed and the whole tail thing doesn't make sense either.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@fingleur1 Along with my other point this tail losing you speak of wasn't observed.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism The farmers who've bred pigs to make their tails smaller and smaller will have observed it. Also the spontaneous tail loss caused by the Manx tail gene is witnessed.
But so what if nobody witnessed it. Lots of things happen without us seeing them happen - it's our job to play detective and work out that happened and why.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 Ya and the things that happened without us seeing them we don't know of. See we don't know about what we don't know about. That is not our job at all. Our job is to go off what we can observe and test. Why would I believe about some speculation that is totally unconsistent from source to source and half of it is made up and was not observe. Do you hear yourslef. Everyday things happen in China and I don't see it. Okay... Also the pig tail your talking about is not.....
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism is not what happens in nature. Not natural selection its human selection. Besides look what your talking about to proove your thoery. A pig tail that we bread is suppose to be evidence for us coming from non life and all matter from nothing. And that all things have a common ancester. Give me real evidence I'm listening. What else you got. Tails being lossed that aren't observed is not evoluiton. Vestigal organs, missing links, geologic coulmn anything you know.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism But we so test things in the here and now. We make a hypothesis that all life has a common ancestor. We ask ourselves, what would the world look like, and what evidence would we expect to find if we are to uphold that hypothesis.
We do those tests and make those observations here and now - it's real science. Just happens you don't want to hear the answers.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@thinkagainism You come home and find your front door kicked in, your cupboards ransacked and half your stuff missing.
You weren't there to witness it - do you examine the facts and the evidence and conclude that, even though you weren't there to see it happen - you were actually burgled. Or do like you're trying to do with evolution - just go LA LA LA LA - not listening?
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 I agree with that. Now give me evidence that life evolved on its own and it wasn't created by an inteligent first cause. Ponder that and really think about that....
Also give evidence you haven't. You tried ice corest but that didn't work. The best you have right now to prove life made itself is that we had a tail. ....
No evidence has supported that and how a tail can show life made itself isn't evidence for that. Bring that into a cour of law. Give me other evidence.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism The inactive DNA and all the pseudogenes you have is only a small part of the modern evidence of evolution.
We understand very well the process of cellular respiration and even the fundamental process of glycosis contains the ancestral highly inefficient energy extraction steps of anaerobic fermentation.
Early life on earth evolved in an oxygen-free environment, that's why. The evidence of evolution is all around you - from your cells, to your goose bumps.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 There is nothing in DNA that is evidence for evolution. That thing is so complex how could you explain that coming from non life. DNA made itslef along with proteins amino acids and RNA. The ribsomes. That all made itself. Why would you choose to believe that? I'll ask you a question what is the odds of all that along with everything else happening and that needs to happen for life to evolve on its own. What are the odds?
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism "What are the odds?" By all probability - extremely small odds indeed as it didn't appear to have happened a number of times.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 There was never an oxygen free enviroment. There never could have been that is what evolutionists won't tell you about or lie. In rocks we find oxygen about 50 % more in the lowest rocks in the geologic coulmn. Plus in other rocks deep in the surface we find in amber bubbles that have 35 to 50 % more oxygen. The earth always did and used to have more. Plust one of the key gases is ammonia. If no oxygen no ozone and no ozone uv lights will destroy ammonia....
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@fingleur1 My reply to the oxygen this is the second so see the other first. Plus they need hydrogen because they say there has to be water vapor but a process that rips that up is uv light rays will come in and seperate the hydrogen from the oxygen that makes water vapor. The hydrogen that is split will be to light of gas and slip out of the atmosphere and oxygen stays. If there is oxygen it will oxidize and destory ammino acids so there always was oxygen which would destory life.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism I'm talking about older than 2.5 Billion years ago! To find high concentrations of oxygen in bubbles in amber will hardly tell you what the atmosphere was like before the evolution of plant life, will it?
We see little or no banded iron formation or red bed formations prior to about 2.3bya plus isotopes of sulphur in deposits prior to 2.3 bya don't show significant oxidation.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 I have a question. Will get back to the science in a little bit. I happen to have a question though. You said the odds are small so why do you choose to believe it happened that way? If the odds are way agasint you and totally illogical by all probability why do you believe it happened that way? Please explain that because it doesn't make sense to me. There are to choses to believe about the world- either someone made it or no one made it.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism It doesn't matter how small the odds are - all the evidence we have points to a single common ancestor and evolution. The odds of that happening could approach zero and that wouldn't change any of the evidence. Abiogenesis and evolution would still be the only candidate.
It's an event that only needs to have happened once in 13 billion years on just one of trillions of planets for us to end up discussing it.
fingleur1 1 month ago
@fingleur1 I have another question. A termite eats wood and can't digest it. It has little criters inside the intestines to digest it. Neither can live without the other and couldn't have came into existence without the other which evolved first. How did the brain evolve or the eyes, heart etc. It all has to be there at once. Can't evolve. DNA needs life for that molecule to exist and life needs it to exist which evolved first? Stars need the elements and elements need the stars.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@fingleur1 There is none evidence for evolution. Absolutly zero. You said it doesn't matter if the odds are zero you said you would believe it. There is no evidence give me some. You haven't given me any yet. In your next reply give me some evidence. The blood clotting system has the right design stop stop the bleeding process from a cut but at the right amount to not clott to kill you how did that evolve. It had to be there all at once.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism "There is none evidence for evolution. Absolutly zero."
Yeah, right - I think we call this wishful thinking. Why do you think that all the serious scientists disagree with you?
fingleur1 4 weeks ago
@fingleur1 Now why did you say serious scientists. I know that answer to that but anyway, so what your telling me is that your not basing you conclusion and what you think. Your not thinking for yourself but if a scientist says so then it is right. Your basing it on what they think. The first part was wrong anyway. Every branch of science was started by a creationist and of the bible. Chew on that one for a while. You still believe everything came from nothing and life from non life.
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
@fingleur1 Just think about that. You said the odds doesn't matter. Maybe your not looking at the evidence but have a presupposition. You believe life came from non life what? Everything came from nothing. Either somebody made the earth or no one made it. Why would you choose to believe that no one made it and it made itself? How can there be any evidence for that? Give me some evidence in your next reply because I've never seen any.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism
"Give me some evidence in your next reply because I've never seen any."
You are the one claiming your imaginary friend did it, so its up to you to provide evidence. But theres none offcourse because it wants you to believe for no reason (FAITH) just like every other god! or it will punish you after death JUST LIEK EVERY OTHER GOD! instead of rewarding you after death JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER GOD!
Now why is that......
gorilla199uncensored 4 weeks ago
@gorilla199uncensored That is a loaded reply so I don't no where to start but I'll try. okay, The god of the bible doesn't want you to believe for no reason. You need faith but not blind faith. No matter the evidence it still takes faith because I can't see god or wasn't there when jesus was here. So faith is believeing based on the evidence of what is not seeing. I don't know where you got that from the bible that you have no reason to believe. Jesus question people....
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism To my first reply Jesus question a guy who believed for a simple reason. John 1:50 and the next few verses. There is a lot of good evidence that most people don't know that I am egar to give you but even without that it should be obvious that there is a god. How did everything come into existence. Someone made it. You rather believe nothing made it. Explain that. I think that calls for more evidence because that is beyond the obvious. I won't shy to give evidence..
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism But I won't give the evidence till the right time. We have to work through these points first. Imaginary friend? I didn't make him up. No christian did. The bible did. Again it is obvious there is a god because nothing can't make anything. Punishing you after death? How much eaiser does it get than someone dying for your wrong and all you have to do is say and mean it I believe and poof eternal life. You can't beat a deal like that. So anyway before I give you my...
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism Before I give you scientific evidence explain to me THREE THINGS. How nothing makes something and how it isn't logical and evidence enough for you to see all the stars and the universe and all the nature and creation on earth and conclude someone made it. Doesn't make sense if something is made that someone made it not nothing.
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@gorilla199uncensored You never responded to one of my lasts reply's about symbiotic relationships and all the other stuff. Reply to all of those points please. There is no scientific story to yours. To not believe in a god you have to believe everything came from nothing and life from non life. Still doesn't make sense. "Why not something" Because whatever posses the power and knowledge to do this is someone. Has to be or it is nothing, what you believe for some reason.
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism Yes I believe the earth is 6000 years old. I know like 50 limiting factors and is probably my best area of apologetics. Earth has to be young. I still don't get why you don't believe in a creative force (god) because then nothing made everything. Non life made life. Explain it.
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism
"Non life made life"
Ah thats what you jkust claimed!
Without any reason, let alone evidnece. Theres a reason it requires faith, for your baseless belief.
Science only has evidence etc.....
Which is better? (AVOID QUESTION HERE)
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@gorilla199 How do you explain arceological discoveries that proof the bible true. Hundreds. We know who wrote the and who there to. Who they are true is adressed everytime. We know who wrote the gospels. That is a historical debate we can get into if you want. How do you explain hundreds of arceological discoveries that proov the bible true? It is strong evidence the bible is accurate in what it sais. I'll give you example after example of excavations if you want.
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@gorilla199 You still didn't answer my last question. Out of everything there is possible to know do you think you even know 1% of it? just answer that. It is realevant.
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism
"just answer that."
Then you will proceed to a plead from ignorance.
So get to your point. :)
Provide evidence
Your god exists!
It did it!
You havent as you dont have any.
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@gorilla199uncensored I don't know how to reply unless you answer it.
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@gorilla199uncensored You seem to want to shy away from arceology. There are hundreds. They prove the bible accurate. That all there is to it.
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism
Provide evidence
Your god exists!
It did it!
You havent as you dont have any.
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism
"You seem to want to shy away from arceology. "
NO I REFUTED THAT HERE IT IS AGAIN
Theres none for JJesus existing It being a god, It did magic, It created the universe.
IS THERE?
Science does disprove The cretaion myth. The tower of bable The ark/flood fairy tale "We know who wrote the Bible" LOL Really care to care to explain this lie, so I can get to the Bible 101 lesson for you/ "We know who wrote the gospels." NO Or who the stories where about.
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thinkagainism
"gain it is obvious there is a god because nothing can't make anything."
Well even if we agree with you lie about what science says.
It doenst mean t was god let alone your god!
"Punishing you after death? "
YES JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER GOD!
Why doesnt your god give me some reason to believe its real? :)
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism
"ohn 1:50"
Do you think the bible is all true?
No contradictions?
Why does your god fail to get across even what an xtian is, as xtians disagree!
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism
"The god of the bible doesn't want you to believe for no reason."
Well I hear alot about faith, how faith is required to believe, so your claim is not inline with the facts.
No evidence of your god.
Your god ahsnt supplied any to me.
It never supplied any to the humans that live 10ks 100ks years before it had it first failed religion.
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism
"I don't know where you got that from the bible that you have no reason to believe."
Name one other thing in your life that you belive that no evidence like your religion?
Hers some facts
1) Bible only reference to jesus
2) Bible written 40-110 after by people who didnt see it.
3) We have no idea who wrote the gosepls or who the people whos gosepls they are claimed to be
4) Paul the only person we know existsed NEVER met jesus, again nothing written by him.
Evidence?
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@gorilla199 Yes there is historical evidence about who wrote the bible. All the gospels were written by first hand accounts and in the same generation of his death. Paul in his letters calims to be so serious and claims so many times he isn't lying and sais to have met Jesus on the road to damascus. So what led you to conclude that he was lying. Doesn't make sense does it. I have a question for you. Of every single thing there is to know do you think you know 1 % of it?
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism
We have inactive tail DNA, explain that LOL
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@gorilla199uncensored Better yet why don't you explain how we got DNA without and inteligent sender. Explain to me how DNA made itself and why you believe that.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@thinkagainism
"First off what your referring to goes away after either a few weeks or months."
LOL WRONG! Bones just dont dissapear!
"Secondly it isn't even a tail it swells back up to nothing."
WRONG again, but then again you have to be wrong to argue for the god myth.
Speaking of your gods great designs care to make EXCUSES (just like religion I wont ask for evidence you can make up any old crap)
Why do manatees have hip sockets but no legs? LOL
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@gorilla199uncensored So basically what your telling me is a tail prooves there isn't a god and that we came from nothing. That is your logice. But yes you are wrong no human has a tail never been seen. Plus I don't know why it even matters at all. So if someone did have a tail who cares. That shows there is no god. What your talking about doesn't even connect to the spine otherwise there would be another bone and ther isn't.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism
"So basically what your telling me is a tail prooves there isn't a god "
Proves your creation myth of the bible false, also every field of science proves th ebible wrong in many ways.
"But yes you are wrong no human has a tail never been seen."
LOL LIES OR JUST IGNORANCE?
Go google the answer, theres a couple of dozen papers written by surgeons who have removed them. SO THEY DO EXIST! (BTW other ignornat fundies have dumb excuses so they know thye exist aswell :)
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@gorilla199uncensored So you go to google which anyone who is anything can put up there what they want. Yo type of few words into google and if a human has a tail and google says so then you say there isn't a god and life made itself. Do you see what you are saying. What kind of logic is that. It in no way shows there isn't a god. A tail shows that. I want to debate your logice right now. Plus you do a little search on google and conclude your right. Just listen to that.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thinkagainism
" So if someone did have a tail who cares. That shows there is no god. "
Shows your bible wrong, do you pretend the bible is 100% true? LOL
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@gorilla199uncensored How do you explain areceological discoeries that proove the bible right. Hundreds of them have been found. That means it is accurate. I could give you evidence only if you give me a chance and are willing to hear it.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism
"Ho do you explain areceological discoeries that proove the bible right"
None of them prove anything positive as far as magical gods, or even jesus.
Just like I said your evidence is the same as for brother grimm fairy tales.
"I could give you evidence"
State what you want to prove exactly.
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@gorilla199uncensored I want to prove the bible is right and accurate with what it says. There has been hundreds literaly, of discoveries and excavations that prove the bible to be right. It's not just evidence. They've found digs that prove events, dates, titles, and many other things. If the bible is right every time when it says in the beggining god then I trust its right if everything else shows it to be right.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
@thinkagainism
" I want to prove the bible is right"
Yet you havent provided anything.
Do you know why your religion is based on faith? (science only has evidence etc etc)
Do you know what faith means?
THATS RIGHT A BASELESS (NO REASON TO BELIEVE) BELIEF!
Thats why theres no scienctific theory of the proven false bible story book.
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@gorilla199uncensored You believe you came from a rock. That takes a lot of faith. That's the evolution theory. In my next comment I'll give you evidence to prove the bible true. In the mean time explain to me how nothing created everything and life came from non life and why you chose to believe that. Also I'm going to provide evidence to prove the bible right at the same time you've shown me no evidence to prove the bible wrong.
thinkagainism 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gorilla199uncensored 1 month ago
@gorilla199uncensored IF you want my evidence it is a lot. Could you give me your e-mail and I can send you a good reply. That way I can type a good reply efficiently
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism
"IF you want my evidence it is a lot. "
I want real evidence.
Theres none for Jesus existing It being a god, It doing magic, It created the universe.
Do you have any evidence for this please?
Provide it or state you dont haver any.
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@gorilla199uncensored I do. I have a lot of evidence that will take some time to discuss but to go over this amount I need your e-mail other wise I can't give much of it in detail but only in broad terms because the replys on this are limited. So to get a good and detail reply as many other replys I can give I need your e-mail.
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism
Do you have any evidence For
Jesus being a god
YES or NO?
It doing magic
YES or NO?
It created the universe.
YES or NO?
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@gorilla199uncensored Yes and a lot more than that. Lots of evidence. I've researched this my self because I question blind faith so I searched and grew closer to god. James chapter 4 verse 8-draw near to god and he will draw near to you. I think that is the reference. But yes I have all the evidence we'll need to discuss but what your looking for takes longer replys so if you could give me your e-mail and we can do an e-mail debate so I have room for longer replys.
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gorilla199uncensored 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism I don't see how you can't fit the answers one at a time if your proof is so clear. I think you need the extra space just for prancing around the subject without touching it.
Also, if your evidence is so overwhelming, why do you waste time on youtube comments when you can just write a real scientific paper about it and have it peer-reviewed? Will give you a whole lot of space too.
clerlic 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism If you can prove any of it(as the first person in history), you will be very rich and probably be awarded nobel prices and whatnot..so go for it now, hehe! : )
winterstellar 2 weeks ago
@fingleur1 You seemed to ignor not my last reply but the one before that with the termites and everything else
thinkagainism 3 weeks ago
@thinkagainism Sorry - I don't think there's any point discussing these issues with you. You think you're doing research but you're not and I've seen no evidence that you are interested in genuine honest inquiry.
fingleur1 3 weeks ago
Throwing in the Bush reference just makes you look like a dick. I agree with you about evolution, but pissing me off about politics is no way to get me interested in your video. Looks like you're the stupid one.
Cocteau120 1 month ago
2:34 LOL
floopy312 1 month ago
For people who have brain, i invite you to watch this video: "Stem Cells & the Nephilim - Chuck Missler - 1 6.avi". Indeed, people with brain are few. winners are few.
xchris1800 2 months ago
@xchris1800
"Chuck Missler "
Hes that retarded creationist (i say that as if theres a cretaionist who isnt retarded) that thinks life should start in his peanut butter! LOL
gorilla199uncensored 2 months ago
God created the world from literally nothing. This is impossible to understand, but this is the truth. Math agree with this. everything else is self-contradiction.
xchris1800 2 months ago
This retarded are so ignorants bks of their beliefs, that they dont understand laws, definitions, and maths. Obvious, they come from chance. One single example? e.g: Monkey, what is the answer of this: 1/0 ? This is too much for them. Evolutionist = Retarded.
xchris1800 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God will govern the world in Jesus.
xchris1800 2 months ago
not science. Science is debating this matter. We believe this by faith.
God created the world from literally nothing.
3) It's imposible for the universe to be always existing because of the laws it is governed in.
Evolution, theory of homosexuals, and family's haters. Religion with no support in science. Target. The New world order. No God is allowed, but men. Satan governs the world.
Creation, Religion with strong support in science. Target. God is the ruler, no man.
xchris1800 2 months ago
Evolution is a joke easy to note, but unfortunatelly believed by many. Why? Many like to be ignorants. All the time i spoke to evo-, they self-contradict their own words, and they dont notice that.
truth:
1)Abiogenesis the core of evolution, never happend, the law of abiogenesis states that life comes only from life, why do we need to go forward?. why to explain every wrong of that fairy tale.
2) the universe had an absolute beginning in the past, this is religion, not
xchris1800 2 months ago
@xchris1800 "Evolution is a joke easy to note, but unfortunatelly believed by many. Why? "
I think you'll find it's because these people have had something called "education". They've looked at the "facts" and come to the sensible conclusion that evolution offers the only possible explanation for the variety of life on earth.
fingleur1 2 months ago
Science, history, math, chemistry, bible, all of them speak of a Creator, that's why i like knowledge, real knowledge come from intelligence, real human science perceive intelligence, knowledge from the source. What is the fact about reproduction of species? one species produce always its own species. this is a law, it never changes. Fact, no fairly tale. God the Designer of each species. A religion hidden in science is not science. Science comes from Intelligence. Science testify God. Obvious.
xchris1800 2 months ago
Every retard and ignorant believe in evolution lies, intelligent people believe in intelligence as Designer-Creator, that means God, I know now by evidence that losers are increasing, and winners are diminishing. 99 percent of science history belongs to God's believers scientist, this evo-parasites are taken control of science with religious-political purpose now. what a sadness.
xchris1800 2 months ago
@xchris1800 Your use of grammar is definitely in need of some evolution. Learn the proper use of the English language before you try to post some nonsensical argument. Intelligent people believe in what is scientific fact, not fairy tale. Religion and deities were made up by man to explain the unexplainable before science was widespread.
vf74tomcat 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Christ' Hitchens' books aren't hoisted to the top by free-market forces. There's no great hue & cry by the public for what he produces. His books fit the agenda of the tax-funded public library system which ALWAYS champions books & films that promote degeneracy, Marxism and ruination. One needs only to read a local paper to see that the slant of every feature favors cultural Marxism: collectivism, aborticide, internationalism, sacred victims' groups, thought-crime laws & Earth worship.
procommenter 2 months ago
Africans haven't evolved 100% yet. True story.
XMasterDragon 3 months ago
@XMasterDragon Oh, well done flying the flag for the educated classes! You ignorant worthless moron.
fingleur1 3 months ago
I think somebody has to wash his mouth first before start speaking, Can we imagine how dirty is his mind? it's logical right? A dirty mind cannot think well.
xchris1800 3 months ago
@xchris1800 I don't know. Compared to torturing people in hell for eternity, a bit of course language is hardly much of a problem behaviour, is it?
fingleur1 3 months ago
@fingleur1 you dont want to go to hell, then you prefer to believe in evolution as fact, idiot, it changes nothing, hell exists and you will go there unless you repent.
xchris1800 2 months ago
@xchris1800 I've decided I'm not going to Hell thanks.
If your celestial coward of a God wants to communicate to me directly why and how he's going to send me to hell, then fair enough. I'll listen to the organ grinder but why should I listen to what his monkey says?
fingleur1 2 months ago
@fingleur1 " I've decided I'm not going to Hell thanks" LOL, idiot.
xchris1800 2 months ago
@fingleur1 " why and how he's going to send me to hell
why? bks HE has come, and has die for you, and you dont repent.
How? You will know it when you die(in your body). Keep wasting your life in fairy tales. Time is short, the end of human history is at hand.
xchris1800 2 months ago
@xchris1800 Hell doesn't exist! Have you ever seen it? You live your life based on the IDEAS of other men and not REALITY who's the idiot?
OMG a "The End is Nigh" Christian. How many of you have there been over the course of the past 1000 years? The end is always nigh, but it just never comes, does it. Oh how the Lord doth tarry.
fingleur1 2 months ago
I think you need a more detailed video to shut these fucking morons up. and I agree with achilles, the U.S. is becoming a backward reatarded country because of people denying obvious facts like these, open a Webster Dictionary and look up the fucking definition of THEORY, then slap yourself.
metalfaced0om 3 months ago
@metalfaced0om I don't believe in religion. I use the word believe ironically. I think people take religion too literally there. It should be taken as stories that teach morals, like Aesop's fables, and no more believeable. Evolution is not taken literally enough! Religious people demand evidence for evolution like one thing evolving. Individuals don't evolve; populations do. Where's the evidence of God? The bible doesn't count. Am I less retarded than the average American?
MelyssaAKASkittlez 2 months ago
To an evolutionist you cannot ask him what is good or bad, bks for him everthing evolves, what is good today maybe is bad tomorrow or what is bad today maybe is good tomorrow.
However if you ask a Jew/Christian the same question, he will give you the answer that gave you long ago, bks long ago till today they say the Earth is young and God created the world in six days.
is There overwhelming proof that the Earth is young, and Dinos and men lived together? Yes.
xchris1800 3 months ago
@xchris1800
Creatard
Provide evidence
Your god exists
It did it.
LOL only joking you wont even try as you know there is none!
gorilla199uncensored 3 months ago
You cannot show any evidence for what does not exist.
Mutations never order anything so there is never any order resulting from mutations.
watch?v=HoKVVYJ8KJM
JungleJargon 3 months ago
When it comes to evolution vs creation debate, what creationists do is start poking holes in evolutionary theory OR take well know established scientific facts and twist them. Why do they do that? Well because they can't provide evidence for creation.
OptimalElement 3 months ago
@OptimalElement " Well because they can't provide evidence for creation." Evidence for something that is no repeatible is not an obstacle, by the way what about physics? if you can prove time is eternal, the creation never happend. The evidence would be the concept of time.
xchris1800 3 months ago
@xchris1800
When something is not testable, observable, predictable and does not yield same results then it is an obstacle. And creation is just that. Physicists know that Universe as well as space and time had a beginning and yes you can refer to it as creation. How it was initiated no one knows. We know it happened about 13 billion years ago. Abiogenesis didn't start until 4 billion years ago. Evolution didn't start until 3 billion years ago. Either way this creation is different from genesis
OptimalElement 3 months ago
@OptimalElement "When something is not testable, observable, predictable and does not yield same results then it is an obstacle. And creation is just that." you are right, the same happens with Evolution, right? Creation happend one time in the past.
Remember your words "well know established scientific facts", and you didnt give the concept of time, just accepted that time had a beginning, that's not enough to deal the issue of creation. What are the scientific facts (1)
xchris1800 3 months ago
@OptimalElement we know about time? In based of that facts, how can we define Time?. if you dont investigate this, you cannot have an idea what was before time and trying to make a general definition of it.
"How it was initiated no one knows", do you accept history as science? History belong to science too, and the bible(history of the hebrews and humanity) tells us the answer. This book never lies.Test it.
"We know it happened about 13 billion years ago." Tell me which tools have(2)
xchris1800 3 months ago
@OptimalElement been used to get that measured please, and which kind of logic was used? I get around 6000 years.
"Abiogenesis didn't start until...years ago". Show me known established scientific facts of this. Get life from no-life, and remember "When something is not testable, observable, predictable and does not yield same results then it is an obstacle", And Abiogenes is just that, right?
"Evolution didn't start until 3 billion years ago." Show me known established (3)
xchris1800 3 months ago
@OptimalElement scientific facts of this. My friend, you have more faith than I, did you notice that?, look:
a) You dont know what is time, that is crucial, b)you dont know that we dont have any idea how old is The Earth until now, we have many ways to do so. c) Science cannot prove Abiogenesis ever happend, life comes from life can be proven true. d)Evolution is hold in abiogenesis, and there is no transitional forms. what we see is that long ago there were (4)
xchris1800 3 months ago
@OptimalElement more species than today, the tree of Darwin is in reverse in certain way. What is the problem accepting God's Theory as the origin of Life? Ask your questions. (5)
xchris1800 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xchris1800
"What is the problem accepting the God begging the ignorance as the origin of Life"
Provide evidence
Your god exists
It did it
LOL you wont as you know you have NONE!
You still havent made an excuse why god gave humans INACTIVE TAIL DNA!
Thats because yet again no excuse for proof of evolution and disproof of the primative buybull.
gorilla199uncensored 3 months ago
@xchris
The fossils are the ancestors of current species. Some species hit evolutionary dead end because they were unable to adapt to their environment. Those that survived adapted to their environment and diversified into separate species because each population over time found itself in different environment. To truly understand how this happens you need a degree in zoology which takes 4 years to complete.
I leave God theory to simple minded, because unfortunately the world is not that simple
OptimalElement 3 months ago
Amazing facts!!!, why am i not convinced at all, May I say the cat and the lion had a common ancestor? Evolunist would say yes, Creationist would say no, and I say this is not evidence. I believe in God, it is logical. There is no evidence of evolution, there are group of animals with similarities, that study has its name, and it was a christian who elaborate that idea. No evidence, then Creation remains as stronger theory and religion, Evolution weak theory-religion.
xchris1800 3 months ago
@xchris1800
"Creationist would say no,"
So what does a creatard syuch as yourself to the fact humans have inactive tail DNA? :)
gorilla199uncensored 3 months ago
@gorilla199uncensored surely you are a gorila that became human, and call me creatard who has been created by God, please cut your inactive tail off since it is inactive, are you ready?
xchris1800 3 months ago
@xchris1800
WOW what an ignornat creatard.
Yes humans have inactive DNA for tails, thats why somtimes humans are born with tails as prove by the genome project :)
As I siad youhave no excuse why a cretaor would give humans DNA for tails thenmake it inactive so it doenst show!
Perhaps you could explain why manatees have hip sockets but no legs to go in them? LOL
gorilla199uncensored 3 months ago
@gorilla199uncensored "Yes humans have inactive DNA for tails" my ignorant friend, i cannot have any intelligent conversation with you because i can translate like this you words: "Yes humans have inactive INFORMATION for tails", we belong to different worlds. If we both want to have a conversation, we must start from the beginning of this, that meas definitions of what we talk. Bye. However if you want to speak define what is DNA in terms of information.
xchris1800 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xchris1800
"Yes humans have inactive INFORMATION for tails"
You can call it what ever you want.
You still dont have an excuse why a designer would do it tho! LOL (thats cause there is no excuse)
"Define what is DNA in terms of information"
I dont need to define it, dont you know what it is? Try wiki.
Your welcome to provide evidence
Your god exists
It did it!
LOL no answer there yet again as again there is none!
gorilla199uncensored 3 months ago
@xchris1800 you are not convinced because you are wilfully ignorant of the overwhelming evidence for evolution. If given a choice between wilful ignorance and stupidty I would choose stupidity every time, because at least I would have an excuse for appearing stupid.
uknowispeaksense 3 months ago
@uknowispeaksense "overwhelming evidence for evolution." Oh yes many evidence, like the similarity of human skull/hand with gorilas skull/hand as example, I wonder why the father of taxonomy never thought of that, even though evolution as pagan-religion existed long ago before Darwin. Read his life.
xchris1800 3 months ago
@xchris1800 ok, so you are choosing wilful ignorance.
uknowispeaksense 3 months ago
@j919or lol! i didnt type 'vague terms' it just is all over your head. You might as well stick with your simple bible stories because the science is beyond your comprehension. so sad.
fingleur1 3 months ago
Evolution is a theory that is not observable, reproducable and it fails every test. Start with the length of time necessary. There is abundant proof that the earth is younger than 10k years and your radiometric proof is based on many assumptions and is inconsistent. IOW evolution is a forced theory. Why do u force it? Cuz you have nothing else except to submit to your creator and ur arrogance is too thick.
j919or 3 months ago
@j919or Nobody 'observes' a theory. Do you know what a theory is? You can't 'reproduce' a theory either. All the evidence so far makes me think you're talking total bollocks. 'scuse the French.
fingleur1 3 months ago
@fingleur1 Example: the theory of gravity.
1. I see gravity attract things to earth
2. I see it over and over and over.
3. That theory stands
Evolution cant be seen, cant be repeated and fails.
j919or 3 months ago
@j919or No, that's Intelligent Falling. The divine noodly appendages of his holiness the Flying Spaghetti Monster are pushing objects towards the ground.
And you can't prove otherwise!
fingleur1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fingleur1 ""can't prove otherwise!""
There is much proof for Jesus as God come in the flesh. There is more proof that God is not material and that u spaghetti monster reflects ur own insanity.
j919or 3 months ago
@j919or The theory of evolution says that there is variation of form, there is inheritance and there is differential survival and reproduction between forms.
Which of these three do you have a problem with?
fingleur1 3 months ago
@fingleur1 "" you have a problem with?""
You havent done anything but type some vague terms. I have a problem with ur own ignorance. You havent even begun to approach the flaws in evolution and the flaws in ur own warped mind. You are evil, playing God and thinking that in any way you care about truth and not just survival.
j919or 3 months ago
@j919or The theory of gravity says that massive objects assert a force on each other proportional to the product of the masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The object is falling to the earth and the earth is falling towards the object.
What you think of as 'the theory of gravity' is actually your conceptualisation of the results of these assumptions which I presume you accept.
fingleur1 3 months ago
@fingleur1 "" 'the theory of gravity""
Blah blah blah. That theory is observable and repeatable. I can see it work and I can see it work over and over again without fail. Therefore its a theory that is fact. Evilution is only observable in adaptation which just proves the inherent info that the awesome creator revealed in Jesus Christ programmed into the genes.
j919or 3 months ago
@j919or God bless you my friend, i am not alone.
xchris1800 3 months ago
@xchris1800 Nope, not alone, you'll be right at home there with the other bottom feeders.
fingleur1 3 months ago
There is no evidence that we were ever knuckle walkers.
watch?v=qZev7hb40uk
JungleJargon 3 months ago