Thank YOU Richard for focusing on the I AM US with me.
The title of Your video - above: "Who are we really ?" enticed me to ask us to focus on What We Are Doing Together and How Well We Are Being IT - perceptually.
for example: IF we do not SEE who we really Are, individually, we´re quite familiar with the consequences, yes ?
Are we not ALL awakening - now - here together to the largely-unexamined, untold social, as well as personal benefits, of SEEing Together ?
Thank you for your reply Richard.Yes, I agree, You are making it clear - in words as well as by You pointing IT out - yet, when you pointed to It with Judy, and you both sensed it together, IT became perceptually magnified in ITs beauty. ITs pervasiveness actually becomes visible and felt more deeply by me as as a viewer - with both of You. I find, when a group all looks directly at the looking, - eye to eye - it is qualitatively different than looking at our feet - for instance.
Yes, there is something tremendously powerful when two or more people gather together and see, and celebrate consciously, the I AM in their midst - in our midst now! There is nothing quite like it. It is awe-inspiring, beautiful, loving, peaceful beyond words, deeply satisfying. So glad to share this with you, Sperry!
You responded: "Of course, the stillness here isn't 'private' - we all are this." You know I agree, yet why do you not focus directly on this fact publicly, until it is SEEn by ALL, and instead language it and point to it as private, when there are such dire consequences to keeping it distinctly separate ?
Hi Sperry - I believe I am making clear that this stillness is open to everyone, is our common source, that all are seeing This, as This - there is only, which manifests as us all. When we do the no-head circle, we see this one space. The experience is simple. Many voices, including yours and mine, one consciousness. What a great set-up!
Richard, here´s a quote that - to me - addresses our "misunderstanding". "Love is what makes a family. It's what binds us together as we work through the hard times, so we can enjoy the good ones.I'm going to keep telling this truth. But I'm only one guy. Every single person has an incredible amount of power to shape and change our world for the better, but imagine what we can do together. That's why I am asking for your help in telling this simple truth."
It seems to be an ego'centric choice - to falsely believe in the illusion of privacy and peace within.
What I find is that peace out-here in the world does not happen effortlessly much less consciously until we practice being awake - together - to the stillness that we are at center.
Hi Sperry. Thanks for your comments. I think this may be partly a matter of language. Of course, the stillness here isn't 'private' - we all are this. And what a joy it is to share it with others!
I do not agree with what appears to me to be an arbitrary thought-bound division between public and private. What you are calling "private" can be made perceptually public, to great benefit both personally and socially. I have found it is simply a choice to attend to the stillness at our center - together - until IT is shared "publicly". I do understand you´re concern about being "dependent" on "another or others" to "accomplish" this (yet, "they" are clearly not "others").
You mentioned: "we´re responsible for everything". I agree, though of course it doesn´t mean - as this "private" stillness - that we can readily bring Humanity to Share this perspective. Would You agree ?
I take your point. I think that the experience is non-verbal, and there are different ways of describing this experience. One way is to say that, since there is no one here, there is no one that is responsible.
You lost me with the responsibility for your thoughts comment. If you can't even predict what the next thought will be, how can there be any responsibility for it, and who would be responsible?...I asked a Christian scientist this same question, if this you (ego) you take yourself to be is only a thought, an assumption, the idea of that "me" trying to take responsibility for anything is ignorant ..is it not?
Thank YOU Richard for focusing on the I AM US with me.
The title of Your video - above: "Who are we really ?" enticed me to ask us to focus on What We Are Doing Together and How Well We Are Being IT - perceptually.
for example: IF we do not SEE who we really Are, individually, we´re quite familiar with the consequences, yes ?
Are we not ALL awakening - now - here together to the largely-unexamined, untold social, as well as personal benefits, of SEEing Together ?
What do You find ?
Nysqually 2 months ago
Thank you for your reply Richard.Yes, I agree, You are making it clear - in words as well as by You pointing IT out - yet, when you pointed to It with Judy, and you both sensed it together, IT became perceptually magnified in ITs beauty. ITs pervasiveness actually becomes visible and felt more deeply by me as as a viewer - with both of You. I find, when a group all looks directly at the looking, - eye to eye - it is qualitatively different than looking at our feet - for instance.
Nysqually 2 months ago
Yes, there is something tremendously powerful when two or more people gather together and see, and celebrate consciously, the I AM in their midst - in our midst now! There is nothing quite like it. It is awe-inspiring, beautiful, loving, peaceful beyond words, deeply satisfying. So glad to share this with you, Sperry!
headexchange 2 months ago
You responded: "Of course, the stillness here isn't 'private' - we all are this." You know I agree, yet why do you not focus directly on this fact publicly, until it is SEEn by ALL, and instead language it and point to it as private, when there are such dire consequences to keeping it distinctly separate ?
Nysqually 2 months ago
Hi Sperry - I believe I am making clear that this stillness is open to everyone, is our common source, that all are seeing This, as This - there is only, which manifests as us all. When we do the no-head circle, we see this one space. The experience is simple. Many voices, including yours and mine, one consciousness. What a great set-up!
headexchange 2 months ago
Richard, here´s a quote that - to me - addresses our "misunderstanding". "Love is what makes a family. It's what binds us together as we work through the hard times, so we can enjoy the good ones.I'm going to keep telling this truth. But I'm only one guy. Every single person has an incredible amount of power to shape and change our world for the better, but imagine what we can do together. That's why I am asking for your help in telling this simple truth."
Nysqually 2 months ago
It seems to be an ego'centric choice - to falsely believe in the illusion of privacy and peace within.
What I find is that peace out-here in the world does not happen effortlessly much less consciously until we practice being awake - together - to the stillness that we are at center.
Nysqually 2 months ago
Hi Sperry. Thanks for your comments. I think this may be partly a matter of language. Of course, the stillness here isn't 'private' - we all are this. And what a joy it is to share it with others!
headexchange 2 months ago
I do not agree with what appears to me to be an arbitrary thought-bound division between public and private. What you are calling "private" can be made perceptually public, to great benefit both personally and socially. I have found it is simply a choice to attend to the stillness at our center - together - until IT is shared "publicly". I do understand you´re concern about being "dependent" on "another or others" to "accomplish" this (yet, "they" are clearly not "others").
Nysqually 2 months ago
You mentioned: "we´re responsible for everything". I agree, though of course it doesn´t mean - as this "private" stillness - that we can readily bring Humanity to Share this perspective. Would You agree ?
Nysqually 2 months ago
I take your point. I think that the experience is non-verbal, and there are different ways of describing this experience. One way is to say that, since there is no one here, there is no one that is responsible.
headexchange 8 months ago
You lost me with the responsibility for your thoughts comment. If you can't even predict what the next thought will be, how can there be any responsibility for it, and who would be responsible?...I asked a Christian scientist this same question, if this you (ego) you take yourself to be is only a thought, an assumption, the idea of that "me" trying to take responsibility for anything is ignorant ..is it not?
GG74K 8 months ago
maybe the mango loves you as much as you love the mango
maybe the fire wants your attention as much as the attention you give the fire.
hobokenhunk 1 year ago