This should have a technical answer. Something like the response from carlsonap16. I also believe that our brains to too small to understand of the ways of God same as a child of age 2 wont be able to understand anything about college mathematics.
Great question! Anyone who ACTUALLY makes the effort to test the NT claims against the OT will find themselves doubting how J-C could atone for all mankind's sin. Requiring that one must believe J-C as their "Lord and savior" breaks the first, second and third commandments right off. Check how many times YHWH says "I am ONE", "I am your only SAVIOR/REDEEMER/KING" and "beside me there is no savior/god/none else". The NT is nothing but fiction, "New Test", "Goodspell". Gen to Mal is truth!
How important is getting the answer to this question in relation to having you get down on your knees and ask God to have mercy on your soul and turning from your sins against God? What is necessary for you to place your trust in Jesus Christ for your eternal salvation? Are you interested in a relationship with the one who created you or are you more interested in trying to poke holes into His Word? Anyone can poke holes into anything, I think you are smarter than that.
what say i then? That the idol is any thing, or that which is offered in sacrifice to idols is any thing? But i say, that the things which the gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to god: and i would not that ye should have fellowship with devils.
See (from Letter 1st below) cutting it;'s throat, and bleeding it into a bucket, the splashing the blood on the burning alter to please God. Jesus was not a vegan or member of PETA, he objected that they were charging for it and the poor could not afford it.(yes, religion is and always has been a business) He was killed 3 days later as a public nuisance in the regular round up of trouble makers. The charge was sedition (Inciting rebellion) not blasphemy (which was not a crime then)
(From Letter to Laura Schlessinger) 4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is, my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them? This was part of the kosherizing processes from the time of Moses. The Rabies in the time of Jesus where performing the same rituals. People would bring their livestock to the temple or purchase livestock at the temple. Priest would charge for cutting its-
Ezekiel was before Jesus. Jesus changed everything in such a way Ezekiel couldn't see. Only a fool believes a prophet is 100% right all the time. They are still human! Revaluations is a book of the Bible based on a dream. Now here's where you use the brain God gave you kids. The man was a Godly man, okay but he fell asleep on a rock and had a wacky dream. and I'm thinking too much Ouzo!
I have prophetic dreams, but I'm smart enough to not base my life on them! They just are there to help.
Earth will never get so out of God's control that He has to come down here personally and rule with a "hammer, dashing to pieces" all the dissidents like some earthly tyrannical dictator. THE ALL-POWERFUL GOD DOES NOT NEED TO FIGHT ANYONE. The Book of Revelation makes God out to be a sorcerer, a tyrant, a cannabal, and an Earth Destroyer. It misrepresents our Creator HORRIBLY.
wow i love your knowlegde of the word. well throughout the millenial age sin offerings will continue this is just to honour the great work of our lord Jesus Christ
Your chronology is a little off but that can be fixed. The prophetic books were written thematically, not as event sequential. Zeke's Gog/Magog battle is after the millennial rule of Christ on earth. It is during this rule that the sacrifices are reinstated as a memorial to the earth dwellers living beyond the age of grace before Jesus' return to rule. The judgment happens after that 1000yr reign. For a good primer on the subject read"Advancing the Watch" from Tate Publisher's
Chapter 39, is about the end, chapter forty goes back, to another vision in the future, but before christs return. It starts out saying," In the five & twentieth year of our captivity (574 B.C.),in the beginning of the year, in the tenth day of the month, in the fourteenth year, after that the city was smitten, in the selfsame day, the hand of the lord was upon me, and brought me thither." So chapter forty is NOT in the time after chapter 39, its a vision of the second temple not yet built.
@2skullscrushing Nice try. Ez 43:2-7 Describes God returning to earth and entering the temple and talking to Ezekiel where he says "And he said unto me, Son of man, the place of my throne, and the place of the soles of my feet, where I will dwell in the midst of the children of Israel for ever" (verse 7)... descriptions of offerings starts at verse 18.
@azsuperman01 Its still a vision, and says nothing of God coming to earth. in verse 5 it says he took ezekial up. And the kingdom of heaven is supposed to come down to earth, at least for the 1000 sabbat years. Besides dont you understand the archetype of the exodus? Pharoah=satan,bondage=sin,passover lamb=yahushua,wilderness=burden of sin,manna=bread of life, it was all to teach is ra el of the coming of their deliverer.which was told he'd be rejected & crucified in psalm 22. & jesus is not it?
simple answer once again..Heb.10:3-4 says animal sacrifice cannot take away sins..it never did and never will. this question #10 and outlook is faulty by this scripture alone. The sacrifice in the millennial reign is a reminder to the people of the price payed and cannot nor will it ever forgive sins. question was is Jesus enough.. YES especially since sacrificing worldly animals never was!!
These are some of the problems christians get into following incorrect doctrine. It takes an unbeliever to see 'the emperor has no clothes' and post this to your shame. Christ as the lamb has already been sacrificed. Thats like saying NT christions needed to continue sacrificesas a remebrance instead of partaking in the Lords Supper. It is simply blasphemy. And I will say it again Blasphemy!
@TheSkymega there is.. simple answer once again..Heb.10:3-4 says animal sacrifice cannot take away sins..it never did and never will. His question and outlook is faulty by this scripture alone. The sacrifice in the millennial reign is a reminder to the people of the price payed and cannot nor will it ever forgive sins. question was is Jesus enough.. YES especially since sacrificing worldly animals never was!!
@69fordf250 I see where it says partiaking of the last supper is a remindier but nowhere does it say your future sacrificing is a reminder. The blood on the alter will be quite literal and the death of the sacrificed will be quite literal too. What will God be trying to do by allowing this? It is senseless and mans doctrine. Just show me where it will be a reminder?
simple answer....Zechariah chapter 14... there will be people born ( yes regular people) in the millennial reign of Christ on earth who will see the sacrifices for a rememberance of what Christ did on the cross. This is the same reason he still has the pierced hands in the 1000 year reign. You will also not the Feasts will still be in affect in the 1000 year reign in this same chapter.... SHALOM
ok so far ive answered all ur questions. i would probably need 2 go back & read that cos im not a bible scholar but i generally dont bother with technicalities esp those that arent detrimental 2 my faith. All i can say is God does mysterious things and its not until he has done them would we understand why. if u look in the bible at diff stories like abraham sacrificing isaac u ask urself "why would God demand that" but it not until its been done that u will understand why so im not bothered
Your question rests upon the false assumption that the animal sacrifices really took away sins. Heb 10 says animal sacrifice do not take away sins, they were only a shadow of the Messiah who was the true sacrifice for His people for all times, past, present and future. So if there'd be sacrifices in the future they would have the same function to illustrate what Jesus has done once for all. And that's just even IF Ezekiel's prophecy were to be taken literally.
I have your answer my friend. The Christ did not sacrifice Himself for anyones sins! He was Murdered! As a sacrifice to Moloech whom the high priests secretly worshipped. We are told many times in scripture that the Israelites kept worshipping false gods, this is why God kept punishing them.
God tells us in Jeremiah that there was never to be animal sacrifice!!! Animal sacrifice was written into the book by "the lying pen of the scribes" that Jeremiah warns us about!!! Creator/Father=love
azsuperman01 is the first american man i have listened to that actually makes sense. he deals with your book your writings your rules and shows them to be the pure unadulterated ramblings of once wise and iwerd men they were.
I think the Left Behind Series by LeHaye ann Jenkins may talk about these sacrifices. . It has been a while since I read those books. I found them to be very interesting.
I am not an expert on prophecy by any means, but what little I know did not
conflict with my religious beliefs re the great tribulation.
The note i bible states these sacrifices are memorials of the past, as the ones past looked forward to the coming of Christ. these look back. In Daniel -9 Antiochus, a type of the beast in Rev., offered a sow on the altar. The Beast is going to do something
similar? Revelation 19:20 Matthew 24:15 refers to prophecy of the
Abomination of Desolation.. is this a reference to blasphemous offerings in the temple, by te beast of
To put it simple, animal sacrifices are a means for temporal atonement and Yeshua's sacrifice is a means for eternal atonement. Also the animal sacrifices are a means to be ritually clean, in order to take part in temple service. Since the Israelites were and those in the millennium will be in a temporal realm, in order to take part in temple service they will need to be ritually clean. Also Ezekiel says why in 45:17 "to make reconciliation for the house of Israel."
If you are a christian, forgive so that you will be forgiven your sins, if not, you are a PAULITE/ANTI-CHRIST SERVANT...look it up. Don't detroy your own soul with your unforgiveness.
14For ifG1437 ye forgiveG863 menG444 their trespassesG3900, yourG5216 heavenlyG3770 FatherG3962 will alsoG2532 forgiveG863 you
you have done a good job and obviously you have done your research but I must point out one other thing about revelations that few seem to mention.ONE: revelations states very clear that only 150,000 people will dwell with the lamb(assumed to be jesus).that means that from all the people that ever lived, let alone just the millions that exist today,only one hundred and fifty thousand people will be saved. How many christians who are "saved" really are? Not many if any are at all. keep it up.
@MrKmurphy6661 He didn't mention it because even he knows enough about the Bible to know that the 144,000 aren't the ones going to heaven. The 144,000 will be 12,000 descendants from each tribe of Judah that will be protected while here on Earth. They will be able to preach the Word without persecution. It has nothing to do with salvation.
seriously dude you need to do a covenant study,,covenant study,,covenant study.....as i said before & i'll say again.....just because it's written in the new testament ..doesn't mean it's not 1ST covenant teaching...hence animal sacrifice??..what really happened at the cross of christ??
this poor chap can't even see what a miserable hard hearted mean spirited person he's become since he's gone on a 'crusade' against Jesus Christ the Lord of glory.
No sane person would invest so much time, effort and emotion into an issue/topic that don't believe in.
you're a particularly sad man.
you cannot even see that Every man/woman who consciously fights God/Jesus becomes a miserable sod as yourself.
@EvolutionLIE My life is full of joy and happiness. I have a wonderful wife who loves me, a beautiful daughter who brightens everyday with her smile, close friends, a good job, good health, etc. If I were still a believer I would say I have been "blessed."
Sorry to disappoint you, but I am neither "sad" nor "miserable." LMAO!!
(P.S. I don't invest that much time, YouTube is just a hobby.)
@EvolutionLIE yea thats a great way to witness to an unbeliever. so proud you're on my side... its hard to convey sarcasm in the written word so i'll just blatantly tell you that was sarcasm.
You have once again used one of my arguments. The answer is that the doctrine you are hearing coming from these churches is wrong. You just gave the answer. Jesus was the final sacrifice. There is no future time in which we will be sacrificing. They didn't sacrifice in Noah's day after he entered the ark, if they did it didn't do any good, they didn't do it after Lot left Sodom either. They will certainly not do it and the end of the world. Another easy question when you have the truth. Next!
@TheSkymega You should really read the Bible before you try to defend it. Yes, they did sacrifice in Noah's day (Gen 8:20) "And Noah builded an altar unto the LORD; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar."
And the verses mentioned in the video make it clear that sacrifices will continue after God returns. The question isn't IF, the question is WHY?
@azsuperman01 I do read the bible, evidently I was fatigued after answering so many other easy questions. Of course sacrifice continued until it was officially ended at the crucifixion. The first sacrifice being at the garden of Eden. Anyway, Ezekiel was having visions. Visions aren't always sequential. Sometimes God goes back and adds more information to the previous vision. You have to harmonize it with all scripture also. You just plucked a verse a misapplied to for your intention.
@TheSkymega Ezekiel is given a vision of the New Jerusalem. He reports specific measurements for the building, the throne where God will sit, and the alter where the sacrifices will take place. The same angel giving him the guided tour also gives specific instructions about what animals to sacrifice and when... Please explain how this is not sequential and how I "misapplied" anything.
@azsuperman01 I would also like to know where in Ezekiel you feel this temple that is being mentioned is being prophesied to be present in the millennium? scholars have attributed it that period of time but not all.
@azsuperman01 When Christ returns, he will not be instituting sacrifice again. He is the final sacrifice as it is written. When he comes it will be the end of the world. Earth will be in its final days. So you are responding to incorrect doctrine.
@azsuperman01 Who said it was incorrect. I said your interpretation was incorrect. You are not studying or searching the scripture, you are merely looking for what you believe are errors. The bible stated that sacrifice and oblation ceased at the cross. Jesus Was the final sacrifice. If you read or hear anything different, THEY are wrong, whoever they are.
@azsuperman01 God is not going to re-establish the sacrificial system. There is a lot to this and takes a great deal of study to understand this. The temple that Ezekiel described is already being built. The animal sacrifices are types and shadows of what is fulfilled in Jesus. The new temple that is being built is the church. We are living stones in this temple. Most people do not realize that most of revelation has already come to pass on the spiritual plane.
@azsuperman01 it is not incorrect doctrine your interpretation is obviously incorrect. there are many things about ezekiel vs revelation that would come up infinitely more difficult to answer due to their appearance of conflict such as Christ not being from the tribe of Levi, circumcision vs non circumcision and the fact Revelation teaches there will be no temple whatsoever in the millennium. it makes more sense if you are not trying to misinterpret scripture here. it is a difficult passage.
@humanistheart There is more written about Jesus than any other figure in history. Closing your eyes and wishing he goes away will not help your situation.
@TheSkymega No, there's only about 2 lines, if your talking historically. Of course if you count anything written, there's a lot on winnie the pooh. Does that, in your mind, qualify him as a 'historical' figure?
@humanistheart no such being has existed? are you one apt to say you only believe in facts? if you are why would you deny so easily the facts of there being an actual historical figure called Jesus Christ? please share on how you side step His earthly ministry?
@azjmiles "are you one apt to say you only believe in facts?"
Not at all, when something is a fact, it's not a believe, it's just knowledge and truth.
"why would you deny so easily the facts of there being an actual historical figure called Jesus Christ?"
"Jesus christ" is a fictional character in a collection of religious books. That does not, in any way, qualify him as an historical figure. If it did harry potter, aslan, neo and any number of characters could be called historical figures.
@humanistheart you may not want to believe what the bible actually says however if you appreciate facts you cannot deny the historical implications the NT has. it was written. people read it, died for it. the NT contains historical facts from that era and even predicts some (fall of Jerusalem). if Jesus was fictional no one would believe from that era and certainly no one would have died for Him. you cannot deny the facts surrounding the NT, there was a Jesus. you may not believe...
@azjmiles Yes, christianity, the belief in jesus, and the bibles have played a big role in history over the last millennium, however if you look into there is virtually no truth in the NT, or the hebrew bible for that matter. As I said the bibles are a collection of fictional stories, nothing more.
By you're reasoning than there must have been a zues too.
@humanistheart no you are not hearing me here. there are historical facts inside the NT, people, places events etc that serve as a nice back drop to the "fictional" story that is taking place. However it does not end there. The NT was written and had an impact near the time of Christ, within the generation of Jesus himself, when people would have actually heard of Jesus. If He were not real the religion would have died right away. The Jews did not reject Jesus because He did not exist, they ...
@azjmiles "no you are not hearing me here. there are historical facts inside the NT, people, places" It's true there are real places. But sex in the city is placed in NY, and NY is a real place. By your logic the characters in sex and the city must be real.
As for events, no. For example, from real historical sources we know that Herod never called for a mass infanticide, let alone committed one.
Books were written on bhudda, on Muhammid, on krishna. By you're logic all their books must make
just because Josephus didn't mention it does not mean it didn't happen. the bible stands as a rather reliable historical record whether or not atheists choose to accept it or not. it kind of goes against the whole "base our reality on facts" mantra. you can't pick and choose which facts you want to believe and then pretend you are not believing a lie. why does the bible need verification and not Josephus?
@azjmiles "the bible stands as a rather reliable historical record whether or not atheists choose to accept it or not. "
You saying it does doesn't make it so. The fact is through real historical sources and archeology we know the bibles are very inaccurate historically.
"why does the bible need verification and not Josephus?" First of all, we do verify joshephus' work against other historians of the time. It's called MULTIPLE ATTESTATION. Interesting side note, several historians, including
@azjmiles jospehus mention John the baptist but Josephus is the only one that mentions jesus.
2nd of all, when something is written from a rather objective historical point rather than from believers it's more likely. Of course people who believe jesus was real, not to mention the son of god, but who never actually witnessed these events are going to be more biased than someone that has no personal stake in their writing.
@humanistheart thats just it. the writings of Jesus were written in His generation where tens of thousands were witness to Him. There is no writings denying Jesus existed even though these popular historical accounts were being circulated. In the Bible it gives the names of eye witnesses the readers could question if they were so inclined. This is hardly the case for Narnia so comparing the two is not in good form. of course atheists would like to put it on the same level for sure.
@azjmiles "thats just it. the writings of Jesus were written in His generation "
No, first of all to say that you'd have to prove jesus actually lived, which you can't do. But even if we assume that the 1st gospel wasn't written for 35 years after jesus' supposed death. 35 was pretty much the max life span for the people of that time and place. So no that's not in his generation as most if not all the people born in jesus' generation would be about 70, that's not even bad today, but it would
@humanistheart thats interesting because it would have made Jesus one of the oldest men alive in His day yet he and many others mentioned had mothers and fathers. Jesus died at 33, his mother probably was 16 when she had Him making here almost 50! when Jesus died. in those days I believe it was common to include infant mortality as part of the LE making the numbers slightly askew.
Herod was around 70 and Josephus was in his late 60's, old age was not uncommon.
@azjmiles You'll note that after his childhood joseph, his step father, is never mentioned again. What he's not important enough? Perhaps he left all those kids because he couldn't handle it? Or maybe, because he died.
I'm not sure what you're basing herod on, by all means provide a source. But josephus lived a comfortable life payed for by rome. And he lived in rome. I didn't say no one in that time lived long, I said in that time AND PLACE.
@azjmiles And without historical verification, ANYTHING would have to count as 'historical'. You might as well ask, why do the chronicles of Narnia need historical verification.
@azjmiles them real and thus their religions must be true. So that creates a problem for you. After all, if they were not real, their religions would have died out, by your logic.
There is no historical value in the NT as none of the events actually took place.
@humanistheart no you are not using logic properly. we are only trying to establish Jesus as a real person, someone who actually existed not if He is who He claimed to be. so my logic is not that buddha muhammad et al are right just because they were real and neither to I apply that to Jesus. I think given the evidence there is very little doubt as to whether any or all of these figures actually existed. Jesus being the most written about and closest to His actual life.
@azjmiles And what of krishna? I noticed you left out krishna.
"Jesus being the most written about and closest to His actual life. " Outside the bible there's only one source to indicate jesus was ever a real person, and that's quite questionable. That hardly qualifies him as the most written about.
@humanistheart ...rejected Him because they did not believe He was the Messiah. The historical value of the books alone prove Jesus actually existed. As for who He was thats for you to decide. The material written about Jesus was done so closer to the time of His life than that of Alexander the Great yet we don't question his existence.
@therealfriday13th I am attempting to break it down in simpler terms for you. For number one knowing that God is spirit the temple he dwells in is not built with human hands. He builds his temple with believers. Also Christ is defined as the temple of God. God can however go in and out usings mixtures of these terms in both prophetic and literal terms. The time of animal sacrifice is over. Period. Try understanding what God is telling you instead of finding a pretense for objection and disbelief
@TheSkymega Here's the problem which YOU don't seem to understand: If the time of animal sacrifices are over, WHY ARE THERE TABLES(descrbed being used as alters) FOR THEM? That is the issue. I get that he builds the temple with believers, and that Christ is defined as the temple of god, and the passaging of god through prophetic and literal terms. THE PROBLEM IS THE TABLES FOR THE SACRIFICE IN GODS TEMPLE BUILT AFTER JESUS'S "DEATH"! And yes, I dohave a right to be angry, you're dodging.
@therealfriday13th What you don't seem to understand is that to people who understand the scriptures most of your arguments are based on unreasonable accusations or just bad doctrine you got from somewhere else. When Jesus returns the world is ending. The world is remade and their is no sacrifices because there is no need for one. If you read or see something like that you need to 1. place it in proper context..which you can't'. or Learn TO INTERPRET SCRIPTURE.
@therealfriday13th I know you're trying to prove that you know enuff to critic the bible but you don't. God did not make the bible easy to understand. Those that have no root soon grow tired and start making excuses for apparent contradictions and such. You will never get blessed enough to understand anything. So you try to justify the darkness that is within you by your post. If you had truly used that energy humbly seeking and calling upon the Lord you may have gotten somewhere.
@TheSkymega NO, I am trying to understand why there are sacrificial alters in a temple that is to be constructed/will be used(and was constructed for the time such when) AFTER SACRIFICES BECAME MOOT. THAT is what I am trying to do. Stop making excuses and dancing around the issue. A simple "I DON'T KNOW" will suffice here. But stop dancing around the question...it's annoying and only highlights your own ignorance.
@therealfriday13th Please listen, this is a spiritual temple of God. Not a literal temple to be built at some future time.If someone told you that, they are wrong. Each gate and object has a meaning. To find the meaning you must interpret it using the bible. You want the bible to be simple but it is more complex than you can possibly imagine. Why should God honor you with understanding seeing that the spirit you approach His word is so perverse. Therefore it is hidden from you.
@TheSkymega simple answer....Zechariah chapter 14... there will be people born ( yes regular people) in the millennial reign of Christ on earth who will see the sacrifices for a rememberance of what Christ did on the cross. This is the same reason he still has the pierced hands in the 1000 year reign. You will also not the Feasts will still be in affect in the 1000 year reign in this same chapter.... SHALOM
@TheSkymega ..its the end of the age, not the end of the world and the New Jerusalem will be on EARTH as it is seen comming down from heaven in the book or revelation. The AGE will change and the World will change but the world will never end (Ephesians 3:21). I hope this helps clear up...the answer to this question is simple if you know the scriptures and God'' s plan in total.
@69fordf250 Jesus said if you believe in him you will never die. I know what he means when he says that so of course I know what he means by saying the end of the world. The end of the world will come but it will be remade a new heaven and earth, Just as our bodies die and is raised incorruptible. His question is on a continuation of animal sacrifices when Jesus returns. I claim he is going off wrong biblical interpretations, there will be no further sacrifice. Evidently you believe there is.
@TheSkymega there is.. simple answer once again..Heb.10:3-4 says animal sacrifice cannot take away sins..it never did and never will. His question and outlook is faulty by this scripture alone. The sacrifice in the millennial reign is a reminder to the people of the price payed and cannot nor will it ever forgive sins. question was is Jesus enough.. YES especially since sacrificing worldly animals never was!!
Why did God create the universe billions of years ago rather than quadrillions of years ago? If God would have created the universe two hundred years ago, then I would ask why didn't he create the universe thousands of years ago. That is what I mean when I ask why didn't God create the universe sooner. If God has always existed then it was possible for him to create the universe quadrillions of years ago. If God does not operate in time, why isn't the universe older than what it is?
@Aditinggi who's to say God didn't have a universe a "quadrillion" years ago? maybe He did. this question presumes to know things we can't possibly know. its an invalid question that leads to no real possible answer. with all there is to think about and study I wouldn't spend any more time thinking about why isn't the universe older than it is.
It should be seen from the foregoing that Jesus did not come to save the world, or to save any one in the world; that he came to show to the world, that is, to the disciples or any others, that each one could save himself by changing his mortal body into an IMMORTAL body. There is enough left in the books of the New Testament as evidence that Jesus was one of The "Order of Immortals", of The Order MELCHISEDEC. The story of Jesus will be the story of the one who by thinking discovers himself.
ahhhhh my friend, awesome question. but to answer this we must understand that ezekial is speaking of the millenia of the messiahs reign. now here there is still sin but when the new earth is born (after the reign) that is when sin ends
Jesus's sacrifice was made so that people have a chance to go to heaven even though no one deserves to (thats where mercy comes in). And how about you tell me yourself how its gonna be. Oh wait I wont be able to visit you in Hell... my bad.
Surely christians are starting to see that this is all a croc of sh!!t by now. What will it take for you to see this is all a fantasy created in a time of immaturity in our early human history? Only now through constructive criticism in a non church state can we scrutinise and raise this religion story to the ground.
You've got a good point. Personally, I think the only way to avoid this problem is by animal sacrifice. Human sacrifice is better, but since federal laws prohibit it my church uses sheep and chickens.
@smt505 because it hasn't happened yet so therefore it must be in the future? Seriously I know some Christians can be dumb, but surely you know how time works.
Over the years we have all been lied to by many false religous leaders and so called prophets. Many things we have been taught are not even in Scripture and millions have swallowed so many lies by these false leaders. If you are a truth seeker, please visit the web site which is displayed in my picture and user name and take the time to read some of the articles... You will be very shocked. There is an audio there that will shock you.
No offence taken. Taking the life of the animal in itself is not referred to as the actual sacrifice (Even Muslims get confused with this). God Almighty likes to see his servants caring for one another and it is by the sacrifice of giving away food (meat) through which God is pleased. And in pleasing him, our sins are more likely to be forgiven. This concept is drastically different from Pagan views that have unfortunately crept into modern Judaeo-Christian beliefs. God Bless
@ahmedas786 Pleasing God does not increase our chances of forgiveness. Read the Bible.
For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. Ephesians 2: 8-9
Brother, I disagree with Paul`s teachings which place words in Christ's mouth. If I take these words to be true, then I question why Christians go through baptism. Why is this human action needed for eternal salvation? Dosnt this verse say that faith is enough without actions? Also Why shouldnt i just continue stealing, fornicating and cheating? I wont be punished right? Words should be followed by actions. Saying "I luv you" isnt enough in my view. Just my two cents.Peace and God Bless :)
You clearly have NOT read Pauls letters or the gospels.
First things first. Faith without works is dead. IF you have true faith you will show the fruits of the spirit.
"But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law. And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires." Galations 5: 22-24
Once you truely become a christian you receive the holy spirit. Once you truely become a christian you want to do what is right. Even if sometimes you still make mistakes.
For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh. For I have the desire to do what is right, but not the ability to carry it out. For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me. Romans 7: 18-20
As for baptism, This act does not provide salvation. It is an outward sign that we have received the holy spirit and forgiveness of sins.
And he preached, saying, After me comes he who is mightier than I, the strap of whose sandals I am not worthy to stoop down and untie. I have baptized you with water, but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit
Finally, Its important to note the following from the Quran:
It is not their meat nor their blood, that reaches Allah: it is your piety that reaches Him: He has thus made them subject to you, that ye may glorify Allah for His guidance to you: And proclaim the Good News to all who do right Chapter 22, verse 37
Sacrifice in the Islamic context is taking the life of the animal, thank God for it and distribute it to the needy. And by giving one humbles hm or her self.
@ahmedas786 I do respect all religions. Did you mean give the sacrificed animal to the needy? If so then how can you call it a sacrifice to God? No disrespect I'm genuinely curious.
* God himself has always remained separate from his creation & will continue to do so. He will not physically come down to defeat Gog and Magog. However, the prophet Jesus will be sent down
-Jesus was never crucified , he was lifted into heaven in both spirit and body. There is speculation that the man that did die was the traitor Judas.
-Thus Jewish practice is still relevant
- Its too late to give sacrifice once death falls upon us.
MAY 21, 2011 - WORLDWIDE EARTHQUAKE MAY 21, 2011 - THE RAPTURE MAY 21, 2011 - JUDGMENT DAY OCT, 21, 2011 - END OF WORLD 7 Billion - World Population (most will perish) 2 Billion - Christians (so called) - (most perish) 2 Hundred Billion - Saved (Raptured) (Rev 9) Left Behind - All members of Churches & local Congregations who refused GODS command come out of her my people (Rev 17-18 05/21/11 to 10/21/11 - Judgment day - 153 Days (5 Months) of Hell on Earth - No Hope
"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies[1] will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed." 2 Peter 3:10
Visit Family Radio web site for local radio station Listings AM/FM shortwave, internet broadcasting 24 X 7, Now 50 languages covering the world pro- claiming GODS timeline for the history of the World from start to finish Call 1 800 543 1495 for ALL FREE material or Order on line. Suggested reading WE ARE ALMOST THERE I HOPE GOD WILL SAVE ME TIME HAS AN END THE END OF THE CHURCH AGE AND AFTER ADAM WHEN? READ THE BIBLE!
@quitelywait Family Radio ! - What a fuckin joke ! Harold Camping has made numerous false prophecies in the past. Do your research AND `don`t believe everything you hear
What you did was too not "Properly Divide the Word of Truth"
See If you have really read the scriptures with the Holy Ghost as a residing presence within these questions would've been answered with the first few months.
In other words these are Easy Questions that you are asking.
I see some were confused by the question and were scared to answer,but you challenged Christians not people who just like Jesus.
You are an agnostic not an atheist if you are seeking truth other wise you are a Fool!!!!
just because in the chapter before this one? ezekiel kinda jumps around a bit in his book. Read the NT and you will find Jesus was the last sin offering, pleasing to God.
More specific in relation to the funny video posted above about a war between a godlike figure called Satan, and another Godlike figure... called.. erm.. God.. or whatever... It's really realy funny how confused christians are.. about their all powerful god, who can do anything.. doing battle.. It's a bit like me doing a sketch of a lion.. ripping it to pieces then declaring myself victor... pretty hollow acheivment.
Every few months, I like to dip into the youtube forums to see christians quoting bibles.. getting into a tricky debate, then saying.. well.. yeah.. well I believe... so there.. it's all about faith... Fortunately I'm able to take that as closure on a debate these days and reconcile that the person is happy to just stop thinking.... it means theirs more left for the rest of us to enjoy discovering.
with the exception of his constant mispronounciation of the book of Revelation (not RevelationS) he's right on. the notes in my Bible state the same conundrum.. even the scholars cant quite come up with any good answer for it other than it could possibly be symbolic of Christs sacrifice, which is flimsy by any standard.
good thing my faith is founded on a personal relationship with Christ and not scientific or theological rationale.
@benway90 "good thing my faith is founded on a personal relationship with Christ and not scientific or theological rationale.its a matter of faith..."
then don`t condemn someone else if they have FAITH (with no evidence or reason) in easter bunnies, santa claus, unicorns or just their perception of who God is.
What is in the text to suggest that the vision that Ezekiel saw concerning the rebuilt temple in chp 40 is after or has anything to do with the vision he saw concerning the battle of armageddon in chps 38-39?
Are you even aware of the scholarship on this subject?
I happened to stumble on question #10 but now i see you have a whole host of straw men videos on your channel.
Here I'll tell you the future. At the end of your 100th question you will realize that rather than asking people this question which you can't seems to get an answer. You will go after the main source by praying. which in time you will recieve an answer and realize that you wasted your time by asking people rathan than asking him the one that created humanity. Learn to pray, open your soul, and your heart to what you can't understand. Than I believe you'll understand things a lot better.
NO, Jesus' sacrifice is enough. The follow up need not be answered, question is invalid. You pressumed what God will do after something happens in the future. I mean how could you know that God will reinstate animal sacrifices after the armageddon which is yet to happen? Do you have some kind of a more godly power than God that you can be certain what He will do next?
I LOVE THIS!!!! He askes ten legitamate questions and these closed minds give ten versions of the same pathetic answer. God and I are greater than you so fuck you. (Or atleast that's what I get from it). I have to give them credit...trying to use the bible to beat them at thier own game is pointless. Because no matter how you fold bullshit...it's still bullshit. BUT DAMN IT'S FUN!!!! LMFAO
the answer is simple... Ezequiel saw the descriptions of the temple of God, and the instructions he gave were for the animal sacrifices, you can see He started speaking about it changing the subject and reffering to the sins people made on the last one. After Jesus' second coming, maybe new orders mey come... maybe not. only God knows
Interesting question. I've found that the Bible is not in very good chronological order. Kinda like Pulp Fiction. And no I'm not a Bible thumper, just a hobby historian. The Bible itself was canonized by people who were so uptight, they left out half the story of Adam and Eve because they were so appalled by what seemed to be incest. So then we ask how Cain took a wife when there was only 3 people on earth. Answer: Why do you have to get hung up on stuff like that? Next question?
Uhhh.....yaaaa! That's what pissed me off when I asked that question. That was the answer "I" got. I thought at least they'd try to be creative.....LOL ....That's okay I researched it and found my own answer in the Book of Adam and Eve which was conveniently left out of the Bible. Whether it's true or not isn't the issue. I just wanted some kind of answer. I found they answer a lot of questions with a question. No biggie.....LOL
Urm,I just checked,and it said nothing about making animal sacrifices in revelations.Only about an angel coming down with a chain and a key to the bottomless pit.Throwing satan down into the bottomless pit forever.Then pretty much everyone who was not cast into hell lived happily ever after.eh,I see nothing about animal sacrifices.What bible do you have?Emperorvoid may be right about the torah.I dunno about the Torah,I'm not Jewish though.heh.
jesus' offering was the bread and wine my dear friend. instead of animals we use the bread and wine, 2 things which god has given us and we giv them to him. he then returns them to us blessed. jesus told us that this was the only offering we needed. he said " do this in commemoration of me UNTIL i come again. once he comes his sacrifice will be finished and so he will give us a different way to sacrifice to him.
brother, bread and wine have exactly wat ur body needs to survive. they have all the nutrients ur body needs to function and yet they are so simple and holy.
This should have a technical answer. Something like the response from carlsonap16. I also believe that our brains to too small to understand of the ways of God same as a child of age 2 wont be able to understand anything about college mathematics.
yuvanrockstar 1 month ago
Great question! Anyone who ACTUALLY makes the effort to test the NT claims against the OT will find themselves doubting how J-C could atone for all mankind's sin. Requiring that one must believe J-C as their "Lord and savior" breaks the first, second and third commandments right off. Check how many times YHWH says "I am ONE", "I am your only SAVIOR/REDEEMER/KING" and "beside me there is no savior/god/none else". The NT is nothing but fiction, "New Test", "Goodspell". Gen to Mal is truth!
2winfight 2 months ago
How important is getting the answer to this question in relation to having you get down on your knees and ask God to have mercy on your soul and turning from your sins against God? What is necessary for you to place your trust in Jesus Christ for your eternal salvation? Are you interested in a relationship with the one who created you or are you more interested in trying to poke holes into His Word? Anyone can poke holes into anything, I think you are smarter than that.
kimkerchner 3 months ago
what say i then? That the idol is any thing, or that which is offered in sacrifice to idols is any thing? But i say, that the things which the gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to god: and i would not that ye should have fellowship with devils.
I Corinthians 10:19-20
LeviJacksonGuitarist 3 months ago
See (from Letter 1st below) cutting it;'s throat, and bleeding it into a bucket, the splashing the blood on the burning alter to please God. Jesus was not a vegan or member of PETA, he objected that they were charging for it and the poor could not afford it.(yes, religion is and always has been a business) He was killed 3 days later as a public nuisance in the regular round up of trouble makers. The charge was sedition (Inciting rebellion) not blasphemy (which was not a crime then)
irreverentjim 5 months ago
(From Letter to Laura Schlessinger) 4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is, my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them? This was part of the kosherizing processes from the time of Moses. The Rabies in the time of Jesus where performing the same rituals. People would bring their livestock to the temple or purchase livestock at the temple. Priest would charge for cutting its-
irreverentjim 5 months ago
Poor man... he realy think God doesnt exist...
helgardmuller1983 8 months ago
@helgardmuller1983 God's don't exist. And calling your god God is like calling your dog Dog.
humanistheart 7 months ago 2
The Jews are already doing animal sacrifice...where is jesus?
232323C 8 months ago
Ezekiel was before Jesus. Jesus changed everything in such a way Ezekiel couldn't see. Only a fool believes a prophet is 100% right all the time. They are still human! Revaluations is a book of the Bible based on a dream. Now here's where you use the brain God gave you kids. The man was a Godly man, okay but he fell asleep on a rock and had a wacky dream. and I'm thinking too much Ouzo!
I have prophetic dreams, but I'm smart enough to not base my life on them! They just are there to help.
etonks 9 months ago
Earth will never get so out of God's control that He has to come down here personally and rule with a "hammer, dashing to pieces" all the dissidents like some earthly tyrannical dictator. THE ALL-POWERFUL GOD DOES NOT NEED TO FIGHT ANYONE. The Book of Revelation makes God out to be a sorcerer, a tyrant, a cannabal, and an Earth Destroyer. It misrepresents our Creator HORRIBLY.
truthbknwn 9 months ago
wow i love your knowlegde of the word. well throughout the millenial age sin offerings will continue this is just to honour the great work of our lord Jesus Christ
MissChaceurz 10 months ago
Your chronology is a little off but that can be fixed. The prophetic books were written thematically, not as event sequential. Zeke's Gog/Magog battle is after the millennial rule of Christ on earth. It is during this rule that the sacrifices are reinstated as a memorial to the earth dwellers living beyond the age of grace before Jesus' return to rule. The judgment happens after that 1000yr reign. For a good primer on the subject read"Advancing the Watch" from Tate Publisher's
Gbmtmas2 10 months ago
Chapter 39, is about the end, chapter forty goes back, to another vision in the future, but before christs return. It starts out saying," In the five & twentieth year of our captivity (574 B.C.),in the beginning of the year, in the tenth day of the month, in the fourteenth year, after that the city was smitten, in the selfsame day, the hand of the lord was upon me, and brought me thither." So chapter forty is NOT in the time after chapter 39, its a vision of the second temple not yet built.
2skullscrushing 10 months ago 2
@2skullscrushing Nice try. Ez 43:2-7 Describes God returning to earth and entering the temple and talking to Ezekiel where he says "And he said unto me, Son of man, the place of my throne, and the place of the soles of my feet, where I will dwell in the midst of the children of Israel for ever" (verse 7)... descriptions of offerings starts at verse 18.
azsuperman01 10 months ago
@azsuperman01 Its still a vision, and says nothing of God coming to earth. in verse 5 it says he took ezekial up. And the kingdom of heaven is supposed to come down to earth, at least for the 1000 sabbat years. Besides dont you understand the archetype of the exodus? Pharoah=satan,bondage=sin,passover lamb=yahushua,wilderness=burden of sin,manna=bread of life, it was all to teach is ra el of the coming of their deliverer.which was told he'd be rejected & crucified in psalm 22. & jesus is not it?
2skullscrushing 10 months ago 2
@azsuperman01 Was that before of after the alien visitation?
etonks 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
simple answer once again..Heb.10:3-4 says animal sacrifice cannot take away sins..it never did and never will. this question #10 and outlook is faulty by this scripture alone. The sacrifice in the millennial reign is a reminder to the people of the price payed and cannot nor will it ever forgive sins. question was is Jesus enough.. YES especially since sacrificing worldly animals never was!!
69fordf250 10 months ago
These are some of the problems christians get into following incorrect doctrine. It takes an unbeliever to see 'the emperor has no clothes' and post this to your shame. Christ as the lamb has already been sacrificed. Thats like saying NT christions needed to continue sacrificesas a remebrance instead of partaking in the Lords Supper. It is simply blasphemy. And I will say it again Blasphemy!
TheSkymega 10 months ago
@TheSkymega there is.. simple answer once again..Heb.10:3-4 says animal sacrifice cannot take away sins..it never did and never will. His question and outlook is faulty by this scripture alone. The sacrifice in the millennial reign is a reminder to the people of the price payed and cannot nor will it ever forgive sins. question was is Jesus enough.. YES especially since sacrificing worldly animals never was!!
69fordf250 10 months ago
@69fordf250 I see where it says partiaking of the last supper is a remindier but nowhere does it say your future sacrificing is a reminder. The blood on the alter will be quite literal and the death of the sacrificed will be quite literal too. What will God be trying to do by allowing this? It is senseless and mans doctrine. Just show me where it will be a reminder?
TheSkymega 10 months ago
By the way..Cool questions..Thanks!
69fordf250 10 months ago
simple answer....Zechariah chapter 14... there will be people born ( yes regular people) in the millennial reign of Christ on earth who will see the sacrifices for a rememberance of what Christ did on the cross. This is the same reason he still has the pierced hands in the 1000 year reign. You will also not the Feasts will still be in affect in the 1000 year reign in this same chapter.... SHALOM
69fordf250 10 months ago
ok so far ive answered all ur questions. i would probably need 2 go back & read that cos im not a bible scholar but i generally dont bother with technicalities esp those that arent detrimental 2 my faith. All i can say is God does mysterious things and its not until he has done them would we understand why. if u look in the bible at diff stories like abraham sacrificing isaac u ask urself "why would God demand that" but it not until its been done that u will understand why so im not bothered
sweetdietqueen 10 months ago
Your question rests upon the false assumption that the animal sacrifices really took away sins. Heb 10 says animal sacrifice do not take away sins, they were only a shadow of the Messiah who was the true sacrifice for His people for all times, past, present and future. So if there'd be sacrifices in the future they would have the same function to illustrate what Jesus has done once for all. And that's just even IF Ezekiel's prophecy were to be taken literally.
nilzor 1 year ago
I have your answer my friend. The Christ did not sacrifice Himself for anyones sins! He was Murdered! As a sacrifice to Moloech whom the high priests secretly worshipped. We are told many times in scripture that the Israelites kept worshipping false gods, this is why God kept punishing them.
God tells us in Jeremiah that there was never to be animal sacrifice!!! Animal sacrifice was written into the book by "the lying pen of the scribes" that Jeremiah warns us about!!! Creator/Father=love
Rush6477 1 year ago
azsuperman01 is the first american man i have listened to that actually makes sense. he deals with your book your writings your rules and shows them to be the pure unadulterated ramblings of once wise and iwerd men they were.
jfmn24 1 year ago
Against you ! Leave animals alone !!!!!!! --- Please people to do away with rumors of animal !
1111goodmorning 1 year ago
animal sacrifice ???? NOO00oo ! FORBIDDEN !! my rules to do AWAY with rumors of animal ! and baby sacrifice ! I learn from satanic bible, sincere.
1111goodmorning 1 year ago
I think the Left Behind Series by LeHaye ann Jenkins may talk about these sacrifices. . It has been a while since I read those books. I found them to be very interesting.
I am not an expert on prophecy by any means, but what little I know did not
conflict with my religious beliefs re the great tribulation.
HALLELUZZ777 1 year ago
The note i bible states these sacrifices are memorials of the past, as the ones past looked forward to the coming of Christ. these look back. In Daniel -9 Antiochus, a type of the beast in Rev., offered a sow on the altar. The Beast is going to do something
similar? Revelation 19:20 Matthew 24:15 refers to prophecy of the
Abomination of Desolation.. is this a reference to blasphemous offerings in the temple, by te beast of
resuming animal sacrifices.
HALLELUZZ777 1 year ago
To put it simple, animal sacrifices are a means for temporal atonement and Yeshua's sacrifice is a means for eternal atonement. Also the animal sacrifices are a means to be ritually clean, in order to take part in temple service. Since the Israelites were and those in the millennium will be in a temporal realm, in order to take part in temple service they will need to be ritually clean. Also Ezekiel says why in 45:17 "to make reconciliation for the house of Israel."
Nazarene4Life 1 year ago
Wow great Video!!
Have you seen this one?? watch?v=dNFBF1QBLBg
rawhoopstar3 1 year ago
If you are a christian, forgive so that you will be forgiven your sins, if not, you are a PAULITE/ANTI-CHRIST SERVANT...look it up. Don't detroy your own soul with your unforgiveness.
14For ifG1437 ye forgiveG863 menG444 their trespassesG3900, yourG5216 heavenlyG3770 FatherG3962 will alsoG2532 forgiveG863 you
bouKntyhuKnterblood5 1 year ago
you have done a good job and obviously you have done your research but I must point out one other thing about revelations that few seem to mention.ONE: revelations states very clear that only 150,000 people will dwell with the lamb(assumed to be jesus).that means that from all the people that ever lived, let alone just the millions that exist today,only one hundred and fifty thousand people will be saved. How many christians who are "saved" really are? Not many if any are at all. keep it up.
MrKmurphy6661 1 year ago
@MrKmurphy6661 He didn't mention it because even he knows enough about the Bible to know that the 144,000 aren't the ones going to heaven. The 144,000 will be 12,000 descendants from each tribe of Judah that will be protected while here on Earth. They will be able to preach the Word without persecution. It has nothing to do with salvation.
OpulentRedrum 1 year ago
@MrKmurphy6661 nope not even close to being true.
azjmiles 1 year ago
seriously dude you need to do a covenant study,,covenant study,,covenant study.....as i said before & i'll say again.....just because it's written in the new testament ..doesn't mean it's not 1ST covenant teaching...hence animal sacrifice??..what really happened at the cross of christ??
lunabirdie 1 year ago
Rev 19 coming of Jesus (to be King and Priest)
Rev 20 Jesus reigns over the earth for 1000 years
Rev 21 God comes to the Earth to defend Jesus after the devil is loosed!
The error that confuses is the belief Jesus is his own God the coming of Jesus is not the coming of YAH.
ProveYourFaith 1 year ago 3
this poor chap can't even see what a miserable hard hearted mean spirited person he's become since he's gone on a 'crusade' against Jesus Christ the Lord of glory.
No sane person would invest so much time, effort and emotion into an issue/topic that don't believe in.
you're a particularly sad man.
you cannot even see that Every man/woman who consciously fights God/Jesus becomes a miserable sod as yourself.
Repent whilst you still have breathe !
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
@EvolutionLIE My life is full of joy and happiness. I have a wonderful wife who loves me, a beautiful daughter who brightens everyday with her smile, close friends, a good job, good health, etc. If I were still a believer I would say I have been "blessed."
Sorry to disappoint you, but I am neither "sad" nor "miserable." LMAO!!
(P.S. I don't invest that much time, YouTube is just a hobby.)
azsuperman01 1 year ago
@EvolutionLIE yea thats a great way to witness to an unbeliever. so proud you're on my side... its hard to convey sarcasm in the written word so i'll just blatantly tell you that was sarcasm.
azjmiles 1 year ago
you seem like a smart enough guy...why not spend your time thinking and working on problems that are actually real?
zbyszek654 1 year ago
@zbyszek654 The consequences of ignoring those who would push their religion into schools and government ARE very real.
azsuperman01 1 year ago
You have once again used one of my arguments. The answer is that the doctrine you are hearing coming from these churches is wrong. You just gave the answer. Jesus was the final sacrifice. There is no future time in which we will be sacrificing. They didn't sacrifice in Noah's day after he entered the ark, if they did it didn't do any good, they didn't do it after Lot left Sodom either. They will certainly not do it and the end of the world. Another easy question when you have the truth. Next!
TheSkymega 1 year ago
@TheSkymega You should really read the Bible before you try to defend it. Yes, they did sacrifice in Noah's day (Gen 8:20) "And Noah builded an altar unto the LORD; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar."
And the verses mentioned in the video make it clear that sacrifices will continue after God returns. The question isn't IF, the question is WHY?
azsuperman01 1 year ago 3
@azsuperman01 I do read the bible, evidently I was fatigued after answering so many other easy questions. Of course sacrifice continued until it was officially ended at the crucifixion. The first sacrifice being at the garden of Eden. Anyway, Ezekiel was having visions. Visions aren't always sequential. Sometimes God goes back and adds more information to the previous vision. You have to harmonize it with all scripture also. You just plucked a verse a misapplied to for your intention.
TheSkymega 1 year ago
@TheSkymega Ezekiel is given a vision of the New Jerusalem. He reports specific measurements for the building, the throne where God will sit, and the alter where the sacrifices will take place. The same angel giving him the guided tour also gives specific instructions about what animals to sacrifice and when... Please explain how this is not sequential and how I "misapplied" anything.
azsuperman01 1 year ago
@azsuperman01 I would also like to know where in Ezekiel you feel this temple that is being mentioned is being prophesied to be present in the millennium? scholars have attributed it that period of time but not all.
azjmiles 1 year ago
@TheSkymega "Ezekiel was having visions" A statement with no plausible substantiation whatsoever.
MzHellinahandbasket 1 year ago
@azsuperman01 When Christ returns, he will not be instituting sacrifice again. He is the final sacrifice as it is written. When he comes it will be the end of the world. Earth will be in its final days. So you are responding to incorrect doctrine.
TheSkymega 1 year ago
@TheSkymega If the prophecy in Ezekiel is "incorrect doctrine," why is it included in your Bible? Why include a false prophet?
azsuperman01 1 year ago 5
@azsuperman01 Who said it was incorrect. I said your interpretation was incorrect. You are not studying or searching the scripture, you are merely looking for what you believe are errors. The bible stated that sacrifice and oblation ceased at the cross. Jesus Was the final sacrifice. If you read or hear anything different, THEY are wrong, whoever they are.
TheSkymega 1 year ago
@azsuperman01 God is not going to re-establish the sacrificial system. There is a lot to this and takes a great deal of study to understand this. The temple that Ezekiel described is already being built. The animal sacrifices are types and shadows of what is fulfilled in Jesus. The new temple that is being built is the church. We are living stones in this temple. Most people do not realize that most of revelation has already come to pass on the spiritual plane.
jwednall 1 year ago
@azsuperman01 it is not incorrect doctrine your interpretation is obviously incorrect. there are many things about ezekiel vs revelation that would come up infinitely more difficult to answer due to their appearance of conflict such as Christ not being from the tribe of Levi, circumcision vs non circumcision and the fact Revelation teaches there will be no temple whatsoever in the millennium. it makes more sense if you are not trying to misinterpret scripture here. it is a difficult passage.
azjmiles 1 year ago
@TheSkymega "When Christ returns"
To return there would have to have been a christ to begin with. No such being has existed.
humanistheart 1 year ago
@humanistheart There is more written about Jesus than any other figure in history. Closing your eyes and wishing he goes away will not help your situation.
TheSkymega 1 year ago
@TheSkymega No, there's only about 2 lines, if your talking historically. Of course if you count anything written, there's a lot on winnie the pooh. Does that, in your mind, qualify him as a 'historical' figure?
humanistheart 1 year ago
@humanistheart no such being has existed? are you one apt to say you only believe in facts? if you are why would you deny so easily the facts of there being an actual historical figure called Jesus Christ? please share on how you side step His earthly ministry?
azjmiles 1 year ago
@azjmiles "are you one apt to say you only believe in facts?"
Not at all, when something is a fact, it's not a believe, it's just knowledge and truth.
"why would you deny so easily the facts of there being an actual historical figure called Jesus Christ?"
"Jesus christ" is a fictional character in a collection of religious books. That does not, in any way, qualify him as an historical figure. If it did harry potter, aslan, neo and any number of characters could be called historical figures.
humanistheart 1 year ago
@humanistheart you may not want to believe what the bible actually says however if you appreciate facts you cannot deny the historical implications the NT has. it was written. people read it, died for it. the NT contains historical facts from that era and even predicts some (fall of Jerusalem). if Jesus was fictional no one would believe from that era and certainly no one would have died for Him. you cannot deny the facts surrounding the NT, there was a Jesus. you may not believe...
azjmiles 1 year ago
@azjmiles Yes, christianity, the belief in jesus, and the bibles have played a big role in history over the last millennium, however if you look into there is virtually no truth in the NT, or the hebrew bible for that matter. As I said the bibles are a collection of fictional stories, nothing more.
By you're reasoning than there must have been a zues too.
humanistheart 1 year ago
@humanistheart no you are not hearing me here. there are historical facts inside the NT, people, places events etc that serve as a nice back drop to the "fictional" story that is taking place. However it does not end there. The NT was written and had an impact near the time of Christ, within the generation of Jesus himself, when people would have actually heard of Jesus. If He were not real the religion would have died right away. The Jews did not reject Jesus because He did not exist, they ...
azjmiles 1 year ago
@azjmiles "no you are not hearing me here. there are historical facts inside the NT, people, places" It's true there are real places. But sex in the city is placed in NY, and NY is a real place. By your logic the characters in sex and the city must be real.
As for events, no. For example, from real historical sources we know that Herod never called for a mass infanticide, let alone committed one.
Books were written on bhudda, on Muhammid, on krishna. By you're logic all their books must make
humanistheart 1 year ago
just because Josephus didn't mention it does not mean it didn't happen. the bible stands as a rather reliable historical record whether or not atheists choose to accept it or not. it kind of goes against the whole "base our reality on facts" mantra. you can't pick and choose which facts you want to believe and then pretend you are not believing a lie. why does the bible need verification and not Josephus?
azjmiles 1 year ago
@azjmiles "the bible stands as a rather reliable historical record whether or not atheists choose to accept it or not. "
You saying it does doesn't make it so. The fact is through real historical sources and archeology we know the bibles are very inaccurate historically.
"why does the bible need verification and not Josephus?" First of all, we do verify joshephus' work against other historians of the time. It's called MULTIPLE ATTESTATION. Interesting side note, several historians, including
humanistheart 1 year ago
@azjmiles jospehus mention John the baptist but Josephus is the only one that mentions jesus.
2nd of all, when something is written from a rather objective historical point rather than from believers it's more likely. Of course people who believe jesus was real, not to mention the son of god, but who never actually witnessed these events are going to be more biased than someone that has no personal stake in their writing.
humanistheart 1 year ago
@humanistheart thats just it. the writings of Jesus were written in His generation where tens of thousands were witness to Him. There is no writings denying Jesus existed even though these popular historical accounts were being circulated. In the Bible it gives the names of eye witnesses the readers could question if they were so inclined. This is hardly the case for Narnia so comparing the two is not in good form. of course atheists would like to put it on the same level for sure.
azjmiles 1 year ago
@azjmiles "thats just it. the writings of Jesus were written in His generation "
No, first of all to say that you'd have to prove jesus actually lived, which you can't do. But even if we assume that the 1st gospel wasn't written for 35 years after jesus' supposed death. 35 was pretty much the max life span for the people of that time and place. So no that's not in his generation as most if not all the people born in jesus' generation would be about 70, that's not even bad today, but it would
humanistheart 1 year ago
@humanistheart thats interesting because it would have made Jesus one of the oldest men alive in His day yet he and many others mentioned had mothers and fathers. Jesus died at 33, his mother probably was 16 when she had Him making here almost 50! when Jesus died. in those days I believe it was common to include infant mortality as part of the LE making the numbers slightly askew.
Herod was around 70 and Josephus was in his late 60's, old age was not uncommon.
azjmiles 1 year ago
@azjmiles You'll note that after his childhood joseph, his step father, is never mentioned again. What he's not important enough? Perhaps he left all those kids because he couldn't handle it? Or maybe, because he died.
I'm not sure what you're basing herod on, by all means provide a source. But josephus lived a comfortable life payed for by rome. And he lived in rome. I didn't say no one in that time lived long, I said in that time AND PLACE.
As I said, go look it up.
humanistheart 1 year ago
@azjmiles have been extremely long in that time. The fact is, NO accredited historian considers the NT a historical account for many reasons.
humanistheart 1 year ago
@azjmiles And without historical verification, ANYTHING would have to count as 'historical'. You might as well ask, why do the chronicles of Narnia need historical verification.
humanistheart 1 year ago
@azjmiles them real and thus their religions must be true. So that creates a problem for you. After all, if they were not real, their religions would have died out, by your logic.
There is no historical value in the NT as none of the events actually took place.
humanistheart 1 year ago
@humanistheart no you are not using logic properly. we are only trying to establish Jesus as a real person, someone who actually existed not if He is who He claimed to be. so my logic is not that buddha muhammad et al are right just because they were real and neither to I apply that to Jesus. I think given the evidence there is very little doubt as to whether any or all of these figures actually existed. Jesus being the most written about and closest to His actual life.
azjmiles 1 year ago
@azjmiles And what of krishna? I noticed you left out krishna.
"Jesus being the most written about and closest to His actual life. " Outside the bible there's only one source to indicate jesus was ever a real person, and that's quite questionable. That hardly qualifies him as the most written about.
humanistheart 1 year ago
@humanistheart ...rejected Him because they did not believe He was the Messiah. The historical value of the books alone prove Jesus actually existed. As for who He was thats for you to decide. The material written about Jesus was done so closer to the time of His life than that of Alexander the Great yet we don't question his existence.
azjmiles 1 year ago
@humanistheart .... that He is the Son of God but it remains that it is harder to say there was no Jesus than that there was.
azjmiles 1 year ago
@TheSkymega are you not paying attention? Reread Ezekiel 40, describing god's palace. verses 41 and 42 are the relevant passages here.
therealfriday13th 11 months ago
@therealfriday13th and I forgot verse 39...so specifically read ezekiel 40:39-42.
therealfriday13th 11 months ago
@therealfriday13th I am attempting to break it down in simpler terms for you. For number one knowing that God is spirit the temple he dwells in is not built with human hands. He builds his temple with believers. Also Christ is defined as the temple of God. God can however go in and out usings mixtures of these terms in both prophetic and literal terms. The time of animal sacrifice is over. Period. Try understanding what God is telling you instead of finding a pretense for objection and disbelief
TheSkymega 11 months ago
@TheSkymega Here's the problem which YOU don't seem to understand: If the time of animal sacrifices are over, WHY ARE THERE TABLES(descrbed being used as alters) FOR THEM? That is the issue. I get that he builds the temple with believers, and that Christ is defined as the temple of god, and the passaging of god through prophetic and literal terms. THE PROBLEM IS THE TABLES FOR THE SACRIFICE IN GODS TEMPLE BUILT AFTER JESUS'S "DEATH"! And yes, I dohave a right to be angry, you're dodging.
therealfriday13th 11 months ago
@therealfriday13th What you don't seem to understand is that to people who understand the scriptures most of your arguments are based on unreasonable accusations or just bad doctrine you got from somewhere else. When Jesus returns the world is ending. The world is remade and their is no sacrifices because there is no need for one. If you read or see something like that you need to 1. place it in proper context..which you can't'. or Learn TO INTERPRET SCRIPTURE.
TheSkymega 11 months ago
@therealfriday13th I know you're trying to prove that you know enuff to critic the bible but you don't. God did not make the bible easy to understand. Those that have no root soon grow tired and start making excuses for apparent contradictions and such. You will never get blessed enough to understand anything. So you try to justify the darkness that is within you by your post. If you had truly used that energy humbly seeking and calling upon the Lord you may have gotten somewhere.
TheSkymega 11 months ago
@TheSkymega NO, I am trying to understand why there are sacrificial alters in a temple that is to be constructed/will be used(and was constructed for the time such when) AFTER SACRIFICES BECAME MOOT. THAT is what I am trying to do. Stop making excuses and dancing around the issue. A simple "I DON'T KNOW" will suffice here. But stop dancing around the question...it's annoying and only highlights your own ignorance.
therealfriday13th 10 months ago
@therealfriday13th Please listen, this is a spiritual temple of God. Not a literal temple to be built at some future time.If someone told you that, they are wrong. Each gate and object has a meaning. To find the meaning you must interpret it using the bible. You want the bible to be simple but it is more complex than you can possibly imagine. Why should God honor you with understanding seeing that the spirit you approach His word is so perverse. Therefore it is hidden from you.
TheSkymega 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheSkymega simple answer....Zechariah chapter 14... there will be people born ( yes regular people) in the millennial reign of Christ on earth who will see the sacrifices for a rememberance of what Christ did on the cross. This is the same reason he still has the pierced hands in the 1000 year reign. You will also not the Feasts will still be in affect in the 1000 year reign in this same chapter.... SHALOM
69fordf250 10 months ago
@TheSkymega ..its the end of the age, not the end of the world and the New Jerusalem will be on EARTH as it is seen comming down from heaven in the book or revelation. The AGE will change and the World will change but the world will never end (Ephesians 3:21). I hope this helps clear up...the answer to this question is simple if you know the scriptures and God'' s plan in total.
69fordf250 10 months ago
@69fordf250 Jesus said if you believe in him you will never die. I know what he means when he says that so of course I know what he means by saying the end of the world. The end of the world will come but it will be remade a new heaven and earth, Just as our bodies die and is raised incorruptible. His question is on a continuation of animal sacrifices when Jesus returns. I claim he is going off wrong biblical interpretations, there will be no further sacrifice. Evidently you believe there is.
TheSkymega 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheSkymega there is.. simple answer once again..Heb.10:3-4 says animal sacrifice cannot take away sins..it never did and never will. His question and outlook is faulty by this scripture alone. The sacrifice in the millennial reign is a reminder to the people of the price payed and cannot nor will it ever forgive sins. question was is Jesus enough.. YES especially since sacrificing worldly animals never was!!
69fordf250 10 months ago
@azsuperman01 wow you pwned that guy.
Insomnia418 1 year ago
If God has always existed, what compelled him to create, and why wasn't he compelled to create sooner?
Aditinggi 1 year ago
@Aditinggi sooner? this implies first God operates in time and second you are aware of how old God is.
azjmiles 1 year ago
@azjmiles
Why did God create the universe billions of years ago rather than quadrillions of years ago? If God would have created the universe two hundred years ago, then I would ask why didn't he create the universe thousands of years ago. That is what I mean when I ask why didn't God create the universe sooner. If God has always existed then it was possible for him to create the universe quadrillions of years ago. If God does not operate in time, why isn't the universe older than what it is?
Aditinggi 1 year ago
@Aditinggi who's to say God didn't have a universe a "quadrillion" years ago? maybe He did. this question presumes to know things we can't possibly know. its an invalid question that leads to no real possible answer. with all there is to think about and study I wouldn't spend any more time thinking about why isn't the universe older than it is.
azjmiles 1 year ago
It should be seen from the foregoing that Jesus did not come to save the world, or to save any one in the world; that he came to show to the world, that is, to the disciples or any others, that each one could save himself by changing his mortal body into an IMMORTAL body. There is enough left in the books of the New Testament as evidence that Jesus was one of The "Order of Immortals", of The Order MELCHISEDEC. The story of Jesus will be the story of the one who by thinking discovers himself.
KAIZERCZAR 1 year ago
ahhhhh my friend, awesome question. but to answer this we must understand that ezekial is speaking of the millenia of the messiahs reign. now here there is still sin but when the new earth is born (after the reign) that is when sin ends
soldier9718 1 year ago
Jesus's sacrifice was made so that people have a chance to go to heaven even though no one deserves to (thats where mercy comes in). And how about you tell me yourself how its gonna be. Oh wait I wont be able to visit you in Hell... my bad.
AZcristian623 1 year ago
Surely christians are starting to see that this is all a croc of sh!!t by now. What will it take for you to see this is all a fantasy created in a time of immaturity in our early human history? Only now through constructive criticism in a non church state can we scrutinise and raise this religion story to the ground.
wackydan74 1 year ago
lol this video was AWESOME!!! lmao
Bornagain... XD I want those lottery number too
javonne 1 year ago
stop
gg08glade 1 year ago
You've got a good point. Personally, I think the only way to avoid this problem is by animal sacrifice. Human sacrifice is better, but since federal laws prohibit it my church uses sheep and chickens.
frozenparrot 1 year ago
@smt505 because it hasn't happened yet so therefore it must be in the future? Seriously I know some Christians can be dumb, but surely you know how time works.
supermanlypunch 1 year ago
besides he doesn't even talk about war, he's talking about the sin offerings.
supermanlypunch 1 year ago
Over the years we have all been lied to by many false religous leaders and so called prophets. Many things we have been taught are not even in Scripture and millions have swallowed so many lies by these false leaders. If you are a truth seeker, please visit the web site which is displayed in my picture and user name and take the time to read some of the articles... You will be very shocked. There is an audio there that will shock you.
Blessings as you seek truth
Thanks
2besavedcom 1 year ago
im gunna go with, jesus sacrificed for humans and they sacrificed the goats for the angels......that or its fun to sacrifice..
danyandmarc 1 year ago
how did you comeup in the book of EZIK...that he is talking about future war?
jhweh2007 1 year ago
ndlynn08 says it best.
seanfenrir 2 years ago
Hey Seabfenrir
No offence taken. Taking the life of the animal in itself is not referred to as the actual sacrifice (Even Muslims get confused with this). God Almighty likes to see his servants caring for one another and it is by the sacrifice of giving away food (meat) through which God is pleased. And in pleasing him, our sins are more likely to be forgiven. This concept is drastically different from Pagan views that have unfortunately crept into modern Judaeo-Christian beliefs. God Bless
ahmedas786 2 years ago
@ahmedas786 Pleasing God does not increase our chances of forgiveness. Read the Bible.
For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. Ephesians 2: 8-9
LachlanJG 1 year ago
Brother, I disagree with Paul`s teachings which place words in Christ's mouth. If I take these words to be true, then I question why Christians go through baptism. Why is this human action needed for eternal salvation? Dosnt this verse say that faith is enough without actions? Also Why shouldnt i just continue stealing, fornicating and cheating? I wont be punished right? Words should be followed by actions. Saying "I luv you" isnt enough in my view. Just my two cents.Peace and God Bless :)
ahmedas786 1 year ago
@ahmedas786
You clearly have NOT read Pauls letters or the gospels.
First things first. Faith without works is dead. IF you have true faith you will show the fruits of the spirit.
"But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law. And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires." Galations 5: 22-24
LachlanJG 1 year ago
@ahmedas786
Once you truely become a christian you receive the holy spirit. Once you truely become a christian you want to do what is right. Even if sometimes you still make mistakes.
LachlanJG 1 year ago
@ahmedas786
For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh. For I have the desire to do what is right, but not the ability to carry it out. For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me. Romans 7: 18-20
LachlanJG 1 year ago
@ahmedas786
As for baptism, This act does not provide salvation. It is an outward sign that we have received the holy spirit and forgiveness of sins.
And he preached, saying, After me comes he who is mightier than I, the strap of whose sandals I am not worthy to stoop down and untie. I have baptized you with water, but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit
Mark 1: 7-8
LachlanJG 1 year ago
your mom is a whore
jefferyeat 2 years ago
Finally, Its important to note the following from the Quran:
It is not their meat nor their blood, that reaches Allah: it is your piety that reaches Him: He has thus made them subject to you, that ye may glorify Allah for His guidance to you: And proclaim the Good News to all who do right Chapter 22, verse 37
Sacrifice in the Islamic context is taking the life of the animal, thank God for it and distribute it to the needy. And by giving one humbles hm or her self.
ahmedas786 2 years ago
@ahmedas786 I do respect all religions. Did you mean give the sacrificed animal to the needy? If so then how can you call it a sacrifice to God? No disrespect I'm genuinely curious.
seanfenrir 2 years ago
Interesting Video, Here is an Islamic Response:
* God himself has always remained separate from his creation & will continue to do so. He will not physically come down to defeat Gog and Magog. However, the prophet Jesus will be sent down
-Jesus was never crucified , he was lifted into heaven in both spirit and body. There is speculation that the man that did die was the traitor Judas.
-Thus Jewish practice is still relevant
- Its too late to give sacrifice once death falls upon us.
ahmedas786 2 years ago
Animal sacrifices are bad.
lex798 2 years ago
quitelywait 2 years ago
@quitelywait: I thought the bible said nobody knows the time and day of the Lord's coming...?
inphanta 2 years ago
@quitelywait
"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies[1] will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed." 2 Peter 3:10
Only God knows the Dates.
LachlanJG 1 year ago
@quitelywait more like 1 billion christians in a world slightly over 6 billion ppl.
great God 1 in 6 perish. 5 out of 6 foreknew by God. yeah good God of yours.
God yes - hell no
ModernDeism 1 year ago
quitelywait 2 years ago
@quitelywait Family Radio ! - What a fuckin joke ! Harold Camping has made numerous false prophecies in the past. Do your research AND `don`t believe everything you hear
ModernDeism 1 year ago
Look at the commentary of Dr. John C. Whitcomb for Ezekiel 40-48.
srglepore 2 years ago
What you fail to realize is in Ezekiel it is referring to the 1000 year reign of Jesus Christ on Earth. Called the Millennium!!!
In this Millennium before the period in Rev 20:11 which is the Final End or what is refereed to in Daniel as the Consummation
Dan 9:24
In the Kingdom there will be Resurrected, Translated and Normal Human beings.
Christ will reign with His Saints as The King of Kings until Rev 20:7
Then Gog and Magog again try to rise up against God.
Then the Great White Throne!!!
revelashaun68 2 years ago
What you did was too not "Properly Divide the Word of Truth"
See If you have really read the scriptures with the Holy Ghost as a residing presence within these questions would've been answered with the first few months.
In other words these are Easy Questions that you are asking.
I see some were confused by the question and were scared to answer,but you challenged Christians not people who just like Jesus.
You are an agnostic not an atheist if you are seeking truth other wise you are a Fool!!!!
revelashaun68 2 years ago
just because in the chapter before this one? ezekiel kinda jumps around a bit in his book. Read the NT and you will find Jesus was the last sin offering, pleasing to God.
chappachaddy 2 years ago
He prophesied that some Christian would try to answer your questions of Christianity even BEFORE you asked them?! TESTIFY!!!
ristinraccoon 2 years ago
More specific in relation to the funny video posted above about a war between a godlike figure called Satan, and another Godlike figure... called.. erm.. God.. or whatever... It's really realy funny how confused christians are.. about their all powerful god, who can do anything.. doing battle.. It's a bit like me doing a sketch of a lion.. ripping it to pieces then declaring myself victor... pretty hollow acheivment.
GordieRoss 2 years ago
Every few months, I like to dip into the youtube forums to see christians quoting bibles.. getting into a tricky debate, then saying.. well.. yeah.. well I believe... so there.. it's all about faith... Fortunately I'm able to take that as closure on a debate these days and reconcile that the person is happy to just stop thinking.... it means theirs more left for the rest of us to enjoy discovering.
GordieRoss 2 years ago
we can all coexist in peace. its possible.
happy holidays
benway90 2 years ago
Well said! Happy Holidays brother!
camillaross21 2 years ago
@camillaross21
and to you too camillaross.
love is all ya need...
benway90 2 years ago
with the exception of his constant mispronounciation of the book of Revelation (not RevelationS) he's right on. the notes in my Bible state the same conundrum.. even the scholars cant quite come up with any good answer for it other than it could possibly be symbolic of Christs sacrifice, which is flimsy by any standard.
good thing my faith is founded on a personal relationship with Christ and not scientific or theological rationale.
its a matter of faith...
it always has been.
peace
benway90 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@benway90 "good thing my faith is founded on a personal relationship with Christ and not scientific or theological rationale.its a matter of faith..."
then don`t condemn someone else if they have FAITH (with no evidence or reason) in easter bunnies, santa claus, unicorns or just their perception of who God is.
ModernDeism 1 year ago
@ModernDeism or evolution.
azjmiles 1 year ago
AZsuperman,
What is in the text to suggest that the vision that Ezekiel saw concerning the rebuilt temple in chp 40 is after or has anything to do with the vision he saw concerning the battle of armageddon in chps 38-39?
Are you even aware of the scholarship on this subject?
I happened to stumble on question #10 but now i see you have a whole host of straw men videos on your channel.
I'll browse a few and leave comments.
Pormilous 2 years ago
Here I'll tell you the future. At the end of your 100th question you will realize that rather than asking people this question which you can't seems to get an answer. You will go after the main source by praying. which in time you will recieve an answer and realize that you wasted your time by asking people rathan than asking him the one that created humanity. Learn to pray, open your soul, and your heart to what you can't understand. Than I believe you'll understand things a lot better.
baldueza21 2 years ago
So why are prophesies so instrumental in "proving" that Jesus was the messiah? If no one knows the future.
paleosmoker 2 years ago
No one(person) knows what the future holds. Not even Ezekiel. Only God knows. And He CAN do anything He want.
ponkadolz 2 years ago 2
NO, Jesus' sacrifice is enough. The follow up need not be answered, question is invalid. You pressumed what God will do after something happens in the future. I mean how could you know that God will reinstate animal sacrifices after the armageddon which is yet to happen? Do you have some kind of a more godly power than God that you can be certain what He will do next?
ponkadolz 2 years ago
It seems strange to me that a kind, benevelant god needs blood offerings in the first place
stethespaniard2 2 years ago
benevolent*
Get this child a dictionary.
Linkinparknice 2 years ago
Benevolent*
Get this prick a life
stethespaniard2 2 years ago
That's what I said, if you had spelled it right in the first place,we wouldn't be in this mess,am I right?
Linkinparknice 2 years ago
true but you can't expect everybody to spell every word right every time
stethespaniard2 2 years ago
I LOVE THIS!!!! He askes ten legitamate questions and these closed minds give ten versions of the same pathetic answer. God and I are greater than you so fuck you. (Or atleast that's what I get from it). I have to give them credit...trying to use the bible to beat them at thier own game is pointless. Because no matter how you fold bullshit...it's still bullshit. BUT DAMN IT'S FUN!!!! LMFAO
Mikedogg13666 2 years ago
the answer is simple... Ezequiel saw the descriptions of the temple of God, and the instructions he gave were for the animal sacrifices, you can see He started speaking about it changing the subject and reffering to the sins people made on the last one. After Jesus' second coming, maybe new orders mey come... maybe not. only God knows
dronokan 2 years ago
a stupid man used a poor and void scripture such as the bible to prove god and preach truth.
an even more stupid man uses it to disprove god etc
why u even bothering to use the bible in context with jesus and God??? intelligent people don't even pick it up.
don't say a word about Jesus in connection withe the bible, the bible is Roman bullshit.
all you do is prove romans are arseholes and christians are stupid, you prove nothing about jesus or God.
TheyBastardisedJesus 2 years ago
hence "tough questions for christians" he was intending to make christians look stupid..
Gnomercii718 2 years ago
i just got done doing battle with bornagain001. he really is a twit.
johnnythesailorman 2 years ago
omg teach me travel in time:O
Oxstayne 2 years ago
Interesting question. I've found that the Bible is not in very good chronological order. Kinda like Pulp Fiction. And no I'm not a Bible thumper, just a hobby historian. The Bible itself was canonized by people who were so uptight, they left out half the story of Adam and Eve because they were so appalled by what seemed to be incest. So then we ask how Cain took a wife when there was only 3 people on earth. Answer: Why do you have to get hung up on stuff like that? Next question?
ZodiacTeacher 2 years ago
"Answer: Why do you have to get hung up on stuff like that?"
That's AVOIDING the question, not answering it.
Gilmaris 2 years ago
"That's AVOIDING the question, not answering"
Uhhh.....yaaaa! That's what pissed me off when I asked that question. That was the answer "I" got. I thought at least they'd try to be creative.....LOL ....That's okay I researched it and found my own answer in the Book of Adam and Eve which was conveniently left out of the Bible. Whether it's true or not isn't the issue. I just wanted some kind of answer. I found they answer a lot of questions with a question. No biggie.....LOL
ZodiacTeacher 2 years ago
Urm,I just checked,and it said nothing about making animal sacrifices in revelations.Only about an angel coming down with a chain and a key to the bottomless pit.Throwing satan down into the bottomless pit forever.Then pretty much everyone who was not cast into hell lived happily ever after.eh,I see nothing about animal sacrifices.What bible do you have?Emperorvoid may be right about the torah.I dunno about the Torah,I'm not Jewish though.heh.
BodhisattvaxChihiro 2 years ago
jesus' offering was the bread and wine my dear friend. instead of animals we use the bread and wine, 2 things which god has given us and we giv them to him. he then returns them to us blessed. jesus told us that this was the only offering we needed. he said " do this in commemoration of me UNTIL i come again. once he comes his sacrifice will be finished and so he will give us a different way to sacrifice to him.
another stupid question answered by a 14yr old
soldier9718 2 years ago
hey virgin nerd look. bread is for sandwiches and wines for parties.. now go on and watch disney channel
xovux 2 years ago
brother, bread and wine have exactly wat ur body needs to survive. they have all the nutrients ur body needs to function and yet they are so simple and holy.
soldier9718 2 years ago