9/11 (and the 10th anny media hype) was a Psych Ops designed to further propagate Global Governance while taking away American's rights, privacy plus bankrupting its Institutions into a Global currency via wars.
The Media is the 4th branch (Executive Legislative Judicial) of the Government!
Media ='s Medium ='s Hypnotizing Minds
This Corporate puppet news (propaganda) reporter is part of the Government- recognize!
The Government (power elite) doesn't give a fuck about us (regular citizens)!
@IranContraScumDid911 Palisades seismic data recorded a 2.1 magnitude earthquake. Falling crap turning to dust does not cause 2.1 magnitude earthquakes. We also have Dimitri Khalezov watch?v=b7UB6hF0kbU and the ash people of 9/11 Firefighter Peter Blaich And inside the elevator were about I didn’t recognize them initially, but a guy from 1 Truck said oh my God, those are people. They were pretty incinerated and a security guard still in a chair and almost completely incinerated. only a nuke
@danp5648 Then we have a top down sequence with hundreds of visible explosive detonations, with flashes in the dust that leave smoke puffs. There are four clear loud audible explosions in the core implosion. I can easily verify the building did not drop into its basement, not even several feet during the blasting of the exterior facade. A nuke would be one big sloppy blast, not the surgical precision sequence we see on 9/11. I can go on, but lets not worry about it. Nukes cannot be controlled
@IranContraScumDid911 I believe all that data is still valid 1. hundreds of visible explosive detonations, with flashes in the dust that leave smoke puffs etc. The nuke was in the bedrock and I not sure what effect it had. However the incinerated security guard and the seismic data combined with Dimitri Khalezov does point to mini nuke for the center. Maybe the nuke was part of the directed energy weapon theory by Dr. Judy Woods. This combination with nano thermite metal flakes.
@danp I am not trying to debate the subject, just using scientific observation. When all the evidence is unified both Judy and Khazelov are debunked. They choose isolated evidence to build a theory, even when other evidence disproves the possibility of their theory. We know what they use to demolish buildings, we know how it demolishes buildings, we see its effects on 9/11, and we find evidence of it on the steel and in the dust. There is no need for alternate theories, the most likely is likely
@IranContraScumDid911 I believe your scientific observation leaves out too many data points to be complete. NIST uses the same words i.e likely .. so we know likely does not equal valid. I don't see how a unified theory has internal conflicts just yet and you have yet to listed the conflicts. If you know of any conflicts please list them for me. thanks
@danp Aliens had bigfoot fart on the towers, watch any collapse video and tell me there was a nuke at the base that caused the top to shoot out like fireworks. Explain in detail the dynamics of how that is possible. If some idiot approached you and said use a nuke, but dont collapse the surrounding buildings, except WTC 7, you would laugh in their face. There are THOUSANDS of explosion videos, not one have I seen or heard a nuke. Energy weapons that cause internal high velocity gas ejections?
@IranContraScumDid911 The nuke at the base data is consistent with data I already listed and has nothing to do with the WTC fireworks and Energy weapons i.e mini nukes had nothing to do high velocity gas ejections. They do have something to do (maybe) with the NASA heat map. Also the NASA heat map shows one heat source away from the WTC complex. I don't think you understand what unified theory is. Also Infrared FLIR Video of WTC Burning by Carol Ciemiengo shows a second hotspot.
@dan The evidence confirms what really happened, no theories needed. The destruction of the towers was highly engineered, not some slop job with a bomb at the base that would have caused the towers to topple over 1/4 mile in an unknown direction, nor some new top secret frequency or light weapon. In science, the engineering Judy was taught, they tell her exactly what causes a high velocity gas ejection, how to determine its power, and that explosives turn concrete to dust and demolish buildings
@IranContraScumDid911 unified theory means a large very mini nuke with highly engineered Nano Thermite implosion. The NASA heat maps I am talking about also contain heat sources that lasted for over three months and large part of the WTC was NOT removed but rather buried over. Air samples and cancer rates also suggest mini-nuke. Cancer location match the Chernobyl disaster. 9/11 Birth defects also match the Chernobyl disaster. Land fills around NYC complained about ratio active material.
From what I can discern, the reason the 1st responders were told it was “safe” to breath asbestos 3x the maximum OSHA level is because any hesitancy in cleanup could reveal bomb parts, fuses, unburned nano-thermite, etc. It would also allow time for debate on the very questionable legality of Bush’s September 18th “Authorization for Use of Military Force against Terrorists”, the executive order which allowed him to install the US military in Afghanistan with or without congressional approval.
Shut the front door Boys.. We need a powwow
TheSherrykelly 1 month ago
9/11 (and the 10th anny media hype) was a Psych Ops designed to further propagate Global Governance while taking away American's rights, privacy plus bankrupting its Institutions into a Global currency via wars.
The Media is the 4th branch (Executive Legislative Judicial) of the Government!
Media ='s Medium ='s Hypnotizing Minds
This Corporate puppet news (propaganda) reporter is part of the Government- recognize!
The Government (power elite) doesn't give a fuck about us (regular citizens)!
IceManLikeGervin 5 months ago
Russia and the Earthquake data say the towers where mini nuked.
danp5648 5 months ago
@danp5648 They werent.
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 Palisades seismic data recorded a 2.1 magnitude earthquake. Falling crap turning to dust does not cause 2.1 magnitude earthquakes. We also have Dimitri Khalezov watch?v=b7UB6hF0kbU and the ash people of 9/11 Firefighter Peter Blaich And inside the elevator were about I didn’t recognize them initially, but a guy from 1 Truck said oh my God, those are people. They were pretty incinerated and a security guard still in a chair and almost completely incinerated. only a nuke
danp5648 5 months ago
@danp5648 Then we have a top down sequence with hundreds of visible explosive detonations, with flashes in the dust that leave smoke puffs. There are four clear loud audible explosions in the core implosion. I can easily verify the building did not drop into its basement, not even several feet during the blasting of the exterior facade. A nuke would be one big sloppy blast, not the surgical precision sequence we see on 9/11. I can go on, but lets not worry about it. Nukes cannot be controlled
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 I believe all that data is still valid 1. hundreds of visible explosive detonations, with flashes in the dust that leave smoke puffs etc. The nuke was in the bedrock and I not sure what effect it had. However the incinerated security guard and the seismic data combined with Dimitri Khalezov does point to mini nuke for the center. Maybe the nuke was part of the directed energy weapon theory by Dr. Judy Woods. This combination with nano thermite metal flakes.
danp5648 5 months ago
@danp I am not trying to debate the subject, just using scientific observation. When all the evidence is unified both Judy and Khazelov are debunked. They choose isolated evidence to build a theory, even when other evidence disproves the possibility of their theory. We know what they use to demolish buildings, we know how it demolishes buildings, we see its effects on 9/11, and we find evidence of it on the steel and in the dust. There is no need for alternate theories, the most likely is likely
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 I believe your scientific observation leaves out too many data points to be complete. NIST uses the same words i.e likely .. so we know likely does not equal valid. I don't see how a unified theory has internal conflicts just yet and you have yet to listed the conflicts. If you know of any conflicts please list them for me. thanks
danp5648 5 months ago
@danp Aliens had bigfoot fart on the towers, watch any collapse video and tell me there was a nuke at the base that caused the top to shoot out like fireworks. Explain in detail the dynamics of how that is possible. If some idiot approached you and said use a nuke, but dont collapse the surrounding buildings, except WTC 7, you would laugh in their face. There are THOUSANDS of explosion videos, not one have I seen or heard a nuke. Energy weapons that cause internal high velocity gas ejections?
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 The nuke at the base data is consistent with data I already listed and has nothing to do with the WTC fireworks and Energy weapons i.e mini nukes had nothing to do high velocity gas ejections. They do have something to do (maybe) with the NASA heat map. Also the NASA heat map shows one heat source away from the WTC complex. I don't think you understand what unified theory is. Also Infrared FLIR Video of WTC Burning by Carol Ciemiengo shows a second hotspot.
danp5648 5 months ago
@danp5648 Explosives release a very high amount of energy in a very short period of time creating heat, they also are used to demolish buildings.
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago
@dan The evidence confirms what really happened, no theories needed. The destruction of the towers was highly engineered, not some slop job with a bomb at the base that would have caused the towers to topple over 1/4 mile in an unknown direction, nor some new top secret frequency or light weapon. In science, the engineering Judy was taught, they tell her exactly what causes a high velocity gas ejection, how to determine its power, and that explosives turn concrete to dust and demolish buildings
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 unified theory means a large very mini nuke with highly engineered Nano Thermite implosion. The NASA heat maps I am talking about also contain heat sources that lasted for over three months and large part of the WTC was NOT removed but rather buried over. Air samples and cancer rates also suggest mini-nuke. Cancer location match the Chernobyl disaster. 9/11 Birth defects also match the Chernobyl disaster. Land fills around NYC complained about ratio active material.
danp5648 5 months ago
From what I can discern, the reason the 1st responders were told it was “safe” to breath asbestos 3x the maximum OSHA level is because any hesitancy in cleanup could reveal bomb parts, fuses, unburned nano-thermite, etc. It would also allow time for debate on the very questionable legality of Bush’s September 18th “Authorization for Use of Military Force against Terrorists”, the executive order which allowed him to install the US military in Afghanistan with or without congressional approval.
freddietz96 5 months ago
He should be reporting the story, not trying to protect the Government....dickhead reporter.
Born2Flesh 5 months ago
the reporter is such a scumbag for even attempting to defend the government scientists who said the responder's cancer wasn't from 9/11
wearechangenj 5 months ago
You should have free health care periot!
TheIcelandicPatriot 5 months ago 2