@MikaCuber Nah. The tiles you see in this video come with the cube itself (It is a QJ 4x4). They are similar to the tiles that come with the mefferts 4x4
I see these people chat about the 5x5x5 Cube, but isn't that easier than this? there's a predicided center, so you basically solve a 3x3x3 and then just do edges and corners, which shouldn't be too hard.
@FreshPrinceOfHolland Yes...and no. It does eliminate the bother of having to determine the colours of the appropriate sides. However, 5x5x5 centres must be done in a similar fashion...as they don't 'act' like edges and corners, because they are not attached to one another, you would quickly get parity errors in the centres.
Edges are basically the same, except time must be taken to find the central edge also.
I have started to learn 4-4-2-2 (forming 4 edges at once, then 4, then 2 then 2) edge pairing and also devised a method of doing the 3x3x3 cross part of the solve in the edge pairing step. I am currently on a sub- 1:50.xx average.
Cubesmith tiles?
MikaCuber 1 year ago
@MikaCuber Nah. The tiles you see in this video come with the cube itself (It is a QJ 4x4). They are similar to the tiles that come with the mefferts 4x4
TheTwoCubers 1 year ago
I see these people chat about the 5x5x5 Cube, but isn't that easier than this? there's a predicided center, so you basically solve a 3x3x3 and then just do edges and corners, which shouldn't be too hard.
FreshPrinceOfHolland 1 year ago
@FreshPrinceOfHolland Yes...and no. It does eliminate the bother of having to determine the colours of the appropriate sides. However, 5x5x5 centres must be done in a similar fashion...as they don't 'act' like edges and corners, because they are not attached to one another, you would quickly get parity errors in the centres.
Edges are basically the same, except time must be taken to find the central edge also.
TheTwoCubers 1 year ago
it would help if you learn edge paring via chainsolving
LouisMcG123 2 years ago
I have started to learn 4-4-2-2 (forming 4 edges at once, then 4, then 2 then 2) edge pairing and also devised a method of doing the 3x3x3 cross part of the solve in the edge pairing step. I am currently on a sub- 1:50.xx average.
TheTwoCubers 2 years ago
excellent, i use 6 pair chin solving and two pair chain solving
LouisMcG123 2 years ago
lol , i get this time on my 5x5 :P, but still a good solve,hopefully for you :)
concretecubes 2 years ago
Hahahaha. Thanks, back when this was filmed (Three months before up load) it was fast. Don't worry, my average is getting better; ~2:19 now. :)
I'll bet that's still worse than your 5x5 average :P
TheTwoCubers 2 years ago
lol its that same now for my 5x5,but i recently got a sub 2, so im happy about that. see, you are improving!!! nice! :)
concretecubes 2 years ago
Nice. I was happy with a sub-2 on the 4x4x4 :)
TheTwoCubers 2 years ago