Added: 3 years ago
From: promonument
Views: 414,220
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,798)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Chomsky got me started to think outside the box on many issues. I am now a Ron Paul supporter but still think a guy like Noam is a valuable asset in exposing our foreign policy for what it is.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • interviewer: If US is a leading terrorist state, IF Britain is another...what is Canada?

    Chomsky: Where's Canada?

  • Note to interviewer: let the MIT, world renowned, published man finish a thought without interrupting! Sheehs!

  • Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges = "libtard idiots" and "far-left loons." Ann Coulter, Michele Bachmann, Sean Hannity = intellectual geniuses of our time.

  • @PompousPreacher Haha, good one.

  • Chomsky = Genius

  • Chomsky; still ignorant, still irrelevant.

  • "those who defend suicide bombing don't have a leg to stand on" LOL

  • I don't usually disagree with Chomsky but it is inappropriate to equate the Uzbek government with the Taliban.

  • I love this guy.. finally someone who wants to criticize his own country. He is right. The west is the main exporter of terror and violence in the world.

  • Chomsky just destroyed this guy

  • my boy chomsky telling it like it is

  • So what does Chomksy think, that Germans were wrong to fear communism? I mean, what, only 100 million people were killed by communism right? Yeah, no big deal. Germans should have ignored all of that.

  • "US criminal actions around the world". "The U.S. is a leading terrorist state"

    By what definitions of criminal and terrorist? Answer: Chomsky's definitions.

    Maybe I'll write books entitled "Chomsky's Manufactured Definitions" and "Chomskyites: How they Threaten the Survival of the West". Prof Chomsky can be excused since he suffers the effects of advanced age. It's time the old fool called it a day. He should not be in a position of influence in academia or government

  • @gangster3591

    He goes by the official definition of what terrorism is, according to the U.S.

  • @gangster3591 So the killing of hundreds of thousands is not terrorism if it is done by the US?

  • @gangster3591 you say the words terrorist and criminal are subjective. And that chomosky is just going by his own definitions. So basicaly there is no real truth as to what a terrorist or criminal is. Using that logic, which i agree with, then in a sense you are supporting chomsky's position. THat the us should support or go after what they deem to be terrorist or criminals, because what they deem is just subjective and there is no real weight behind their values.

  • @DxsPro .."you say the words terrorist and criminal are subjective"

    I did not say that. Prof Chomsky applies the words criminal and terrorist incorrectly and irresponsibly, in a way that conveys an image of the U.S., in particular, as the moral equivalent of the world's genuine thugs and criminals -Hamas, Taliban, Hugo Chavez, The Partido Comunista de Cuba, muslim terrorist groups. Chomsky deserves to be censured by academia and ignored by everyone else. Of course, neither will happen

  • @gangster3591 lol your comment is so extremely ingorant it hurts to read it. You just refuse to apply it to the people you support, just like taliban supporters do.

    Who has toppled most democratic regimes? who has soldiers around the world, occupying countries? I sure as hell dont see any foreign soldiers in the US.

    The biggest murderer is the US. news flash: your hated around the world because of your actions. Wake the fuck up from your coma. your logic is not flawed, its non-existing.

  • @br0dskalk .."your comment is so ingorant it hurts. You refuse to apply it to the people you support, just like taliban supporters. Who toppled most democratic regimes? who has soldiers around the world occupying countries? I dont see foreign soldiers in the US. Biggest murderer is the US. news flash: your hated around the world because of your actions. Wake up from your coma. your logic is not flawed its non-existing"?

    Thanks for an erudite analysis son. I'll take it under advisement

  • This dude seems to know what he's talking about, on a sidenote: RON PAUL 2012!

  • Headshot

  • Chomsky is phenomenal! This man is incredibly logical, insightful and compassionate. He should be put on a pedestal, celebrated and made to be listened to by our government.

  • Chomsky is very honest in this video.

  • I am no Chomsky fan, but this reporter makes him look like The Intellect Itself.

  • What is this guy talking about, the Taliban are still around. What continent is this guy living in?

  • @408Magenta

    you pretend to know more about the continent you are living in rather than Chomsky?

    guy, he knows what he is saying, respect our society intellectuals as at least these people know what they are saying rather than babbling others sayings.

    he is not trying to convict you and I, he is here to say what our governments do today are wrong. and remember, Taliban and any other fucking islamist groups have been manipulated by our own lovely state!

  • @MrJkjkhd I'm 100 percent for Mr. Chomsky. There isn't a word that I doubt and I'm serious about this. Probably referring to the interviewer.

  • Chomsky is a world clown of deceit..a smart one yes!

    `International terrorism` has an objective 2 vanquish bigoted threatening organisations that can`t be appeased by other means.Those(real terrorists)has one goal,regardless..seeking to provoke chaos and destruction.

    Real terrorist organisations are not bound by moral dilemas,nor healthy internal dialogues.

  • @MrLamalo1

    The us is not bound by moral dilemmas nor healthy internal dialogues either - exactly Noam's point. Go case by case and explain the "bigoted threatening organizations" and Noam will take you apart piece by piece.

  • @MrLamalo1 I think i will take an MIT professors word over some random person on YT.

  • @Bilderbergz lulz so true

  • @MrLamalo1 go back to your meds and try and sleep it off, come back in about 3 months.

  • Snark aside, you refer to The Bilderberg Group. I presume it is simply one of the many exclusive and persistent institutions of America's wealthy elite for indoctrinating corporate and political leaders. See the section on social clubs in Domhoff's Who Rules America (1967-2010) for a general discussion.

    Trilateral Commission is interesting for its The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies (1975) in which our betters fret about the public forgetting their place. LOL.

  • You seem well informed. You type like me when I'm 100% right on this mater.You read deep in to the comments but are selective in to whom you will respond to. You target those that seem to be misinformed on topics that carry significance and you speak in a classic format. My perceptive conclusion is that you must be one of the few that knows what truly lies behind the smoke that shrouds THE truth.I seek truths regarding Builder Berg group.Please?

  • Every war has been made valid to the public like this. There has to be an enemy X that is then portrayed as a threat to the nation, and it's always "self-defence". What's so funny about it is that the both parties are doing this, so who's actually to blame?

  • Kennedy was shot because he was planing to pull out of Vietnam among other things the government did not like. Kennedy should not be listed with the rest of the Builder Berg piked presidents.

  • @justinwoolee You have been bamboozled by historical revisionism. JFK was no dove. Under his administration the covert war against South Vietnam became overt replete with bombing of civilians and napalming food crops. After the assassination his historian and his colleagues set about softening and romanticizing the Camelot image. I challenge you to find documentation that demonstrates that John "Bay of Pigs" Kennedy was making secret plans to halt the destruction of Vietnam before his death.

  • @DB0blivion You seem well informed. You type like me when I'm 100% right on this mater.You read deep in to the comments but are selective in to whom you will respond to. You target those that seem to be misinformed on topics that carry significance and you speak in a classic format. My perceptive conclusion is that you must be one of the few that knows what truly lies behind the smoke that shrouds THE truth.I seek truths regarding Builder Berg group.Please?

  • @DB0blivion He was assinated six months after he started to print $2 and $5 bills amounting to billions with the intent of shutting down the FED. For good measure they also took out his brother.

  • Noam Chomsky has slipped into irrelevancy.

  • @greenback001 keep telling yourself that if you need to if it helps you sleep at night. I can't imagine why it would.

  • Evan Solomon is such a piece of. I lost all respect for him after this interview. He pretends to be a fan of his, saying "always a pleasure" at the end. At the beginning, he describes the propaganda model, as though he actually understood it. He was probably reading a teleprompter.

    Everything in the middle showed he had not a clue of what he was talking about. Complete idiot.

  • Our world is looking like 1984, the everlasting war against an enemy that we can't see, our freedoms if we ever had any are lost, the middle class is supporting the weight of this disaster of an economy, only exception is that the U.S is at the forefront

  • :D*

  • Evan Solomon is annoying

  • @Threeli maybe so, but he definitely gets the best out of Chomsky. I think his best interviews come out of interviewers who are slightly antagonistic (or wrong with the facts!)

  • Yes, the US commits unacceptable crimes around the world... But is it equivalent to Nazi Germany? Not in the slightest. I don't support many of the actions of the US government, but neither does it deserve, when examined objectively, to be vilified as some sadistic, tyrannical regime. Such accusations are hysterical and ill-founded.

  • @Bangell99

    How many countries does US need to bomb before it can also be characterised as tyrannical regime ? Wikileaks dares to let out a video showing US atrocities in Pakistan, no ones goes in jail, instead of the man who revealed this atrocity. Never before in history were there so many people imprisoned as in today' s USA. Hitler burned the Parliament and blamed the communist, Bush may have done the same with 9/11 and Muslims. In both occasions military was the most funded gov. spector

  • US is prepared for a war against Iran as we re speaking. US still has military bases all over the world and thousands of soldiers in many countries.And all of these in these times of huge public debt.

    I could go on and on. The facts are overwhelming. It is hardly any criticism to say "US commits unacceptable crimes". Only a fasist would argue that. You need to take it one step further. Ask someone in Europe, Latin America, Asia or Africa what they think of US.See the big picture.

  • Why on earth is an intelligent professor like Noam Chomsky interviewed by a an eighteen year old boy??

  • I have to point out that close to the end, when he starts in about the just causes, he makes the fallacious argument of presenting injustices that the U.S. has committed, and alluding to the conclusion that because there have been some acts committed by the U.S. without just cause, that means all acts committed by the U.S. must ave no just cause. This is the fallacy of composition. I'm not taking any side in this issue, just pointing out a flaw I noticed in the argument.

  • Chomsky schooled this kid

  • 3:28 "George Bush's favorite philosopher: Jesus Christ". LOL

    Noam Chomsky is a brilliant man....

    He makes sense!

  • *thanks* for this interesting upload !

    --

    this was recorded(aired?) WHEN ? and (taken from?) where?

    (PLEASE ADD TO THE DESCRIPTION ! (a/o title)

    

  • Diplomatic accountant resource assassins, jackals, insurgents, and when all else fails military force, to claim resources land and power while leaving country's and nations impoverished and slaved. Stealth destruction through aggressive business tactics, backed by IA and military might.

  • Brilliant... 

  • You are a great man sir!

  • Mrandrewshepard- I understand your defense JFK. I liked him too for what he tried to do. But Mr. Chomsky is supremely studied scholar, with a lifetime of wisdom and knowledge on politics and foreign policy. Most importantly, he's honest! We would be wise to listen to what he has to say.

  • @piperadio We should listen to what Chomsky has to say but we should then carefully analyze what is said, for I believe he is a dangerous man. For instance, he offers statement after statement comparing the United States to Nazi Germany. We are not Nazi Germany. Fuck Chomsky.

  • @beeroosterm

    that is a very sophisticated analysis. thanx for sharing

  • @badseed86 Not much I can do with 500 characters; I must be succinct and to the point. For example: Eat my shorts. Thank you.

  • @beeroosterm no germany was focused on jews, you guys go for muslims

  • 128 people still believe in the u.s government and are still awaiting change...RETARDS!

  • kennedy? he is not a suspect, unless youre talking from an international bankers point of view when he signed an act to create our currency (money) from our treasury. shortly after he was killed and the following president disguarded that act. the reason for the act in the first place was that we dont need the fed reserve, it is the biggest fraud ever, every dollar they make they loan it to the banks and our government with interest! do the math we will never get out of debt. END THE FED RESERVE

  • A brilliant man - please watch some of my efforts - 911 by GMM pts 1 - 9.

  • I don't care what has to be done to maintain power and freedom in the country I live in. The world is not a pretty place. Chomsky is an idealist who doesn't seem to consider the undeniable, unstoppable nature of men in his idealism.

    "Pacifism is a nice idea but it can get you killed. We're not there yet. Evolution is slow, small pox is fast."

    - George Carlin

  • Modern US is just like Hitler's Germany, only more successful.

  • @huevosteve Maybe the "4th Reich"... Enough time to work out the "kinks".

  • @huevosteve - no it isn't. Not in the slightest.

  • @justabloke1

    1)Starts imperialist wars (Irak, Afghanistan, Palestina, in support of Israel, here in Mexico with the war against drugs etc?

    2)Has a huge propaganda machine against other kinds of thought (FOX news), even race (i am mexican, so i know)

    3) Tortures and experiments with prisioners in concentration camps (Guantanamo, Irak, and who knows where else)

    4) Has (not lately, but has had for a while) an enormous popular suppport, only because the people ignore what their government does

  • @huevosteve

    only modern us?

  • @huevosteve Definitely alot of Jews killed since 2009, too!

  • @huevosteve

    *modern* US?

  • @huevosteve more subtle

  • @huevosteve That's a very broad and bold statement and I think any ignorant person would like your comment. Could you point out exact examples on how they are similar? Because I can tell you now that all countries have to persuade their people to believe in their cause. Same thing when the US declared war on Japan and Germany, only in that era it was completely obvious.

  • @woopsme One thing is to persuade, other is to manipulate. One and maybe the most important similarity is the fact that US government commits atrocities it believes are justified, but keeps it's people ignorant of them. Murder, tourture, terrorist actions, are now known to be regular procedures of the government to "fight terrorism", wich is an excuse for it's interventionist policies.

  • @huevosteve Ok my first question to you is, how can you define an act of terrorism vs. an act of defense and retaliation. It seems to me that any class of war is defined by you as "Terrorism." When is an act terrorism and when is one defense to the terrorism? Of course, it is obvious that every government in recorded history has covered up things. If you can provide me with an example of when this did not occur in a government then I will stand corrected, but until then...

  • @woopsme ..it has forever been the common denominator in society. Where you are wrong is on the scale of which you are comparing. Yes, in principle you are correct both countries covered things, just like ever other government that ever existed. But, what the Nazi Germany did was one of the most grotesque crimes against humanity that ever happened. There's no way to compare it in scale. So why was our war against the Taliban in Afghanistan not justified and considered Terrorism?

  • @woopsme It was not terrorism, in fact it was a declared war. Our intent was not to strike fear into the Afghan people, but to take the Taliban out of power. We did just that, but our plan to sustain Afghan governmental power was weak and we lost the initiative. I think it's very easy and weak to call any super power who stands up for itself and declares war on smaller countries a "terrorist" state. Everything you said is simple, the argument is weak and a 7th grader could make it.

  • @woopsme There are just and unjust wars. WWII was a just war against a serious threat. The subsequent wars US started are not easy to justify. For example (since i'm mexican and i know the US has regularly intevened in latinamerica) the School of the Americas was a clear case of state terrorism. The CIA trained assassins to fight popularly elected revolutionary left-wing leaders, democratic regimes. Why? Because their corporatist interests were threatened.

  • @huevosteve United Fruit. Nuff said.

  • @huevosteve .."The CIA trained assassins to fight popularly elected revolutionary left-wing leaders, democratic regimes because their corporatist interests were threatened"

    This should be seen in a cold war context; ie, the relentless encroachment of Soviet/Cuban influence in the region. Corporate interest was a relatively minor factor for the U.S. Much more important were issues of security. The U.S. could not allow Soviet/Cuban meddling in Latin America to go unchallenged

  • @woopsme "Terrorism" is a greatly abused concept, and missinterpreted. Chomsky says it clearly: when we do it is defense, is counterterrorism; when they do it is terrorism. Isn't it a terrorist action to break into civilinas houses, torture them, kill them randomly, bomb cities, etc? The true meaning of terrorism is to create a violent environment to deter a specific type of action or thougt. US's invations have this function: deter everything that opposes to them.

  • @huevosteve I think you're greatly abusing it. By your definition all acts of war are Terrorism. In what war in history have houses of civilians not been broken into, cities not bombed, civilians killed? Seriously name me one where the nation's soldiers followed every rule. Please enlighten me.

  • @woopsme No. Legitimate defense actions and terrosist actions are different. Cuban revolution for example, was against an oppresive regime, and the killing of Batista's followers were justified by the greater good. When a country is invaded for no good reason, it's normal the population to defend what's theirs. They'll try to slow down the invasion at any cost, even if they need to blow up themselves. The US says this is terrorism, and they kill and torture whoever they suspect will fight back

  • @woopsme The US is the greatest terrorist State because, to deter terrorism, it will hunt you down, torture you and kill you under the slightest suspect. You need to be more critical. People who defend the establishment are almost never fair with their arguments. You can't be a fair judge for your own cause. To know your country you must not only listen to what your government tell you, but what other peoploe from other countries tell you.

  • @huevosteve You're retarded, you just repeated what those nimwits just said, and you said that America is a terrorist state fighting terror. We didn't start this, Osama bin laden started this, don't forget that and don't take you're freedom to say dumb things for granted.

  • @woopsme I'm retarded? Your'e the one who isn't able to see that there is some people who have reasosns to lie to you. You think it's impossible, don't you? I wanted to point out that the excuse for fighting terrorism has justified to the eyes of the american herd the horrible things their government does, and that's because they know nothing about them. Have you ever heard a meaningful substantial speech, one that actually says something from the president, not emotive manipulated crap?

  • @woopsme I'd like to see how you debate Chomsky's books, other than calling him retarded or nimwit. He's just pointing out facts that ordinary citizens like you are just too blind to see, due to the official speech, the xenophobic propaganda and the extreme ignorance of things. Have you ever heard of a little document about something called Operation Northwoods? Of course not. Look for it. It's a little expamle of my point on why The US is a terrorist state. 

  • @huevosteve Finally! Someone responds with something real. Never heard of Operation Northwoods, but I am an open minded person so I will check it out.

  • @woopsme Osama is just a lame excuse for the elites to fuck up the middle east. Do you think they hate you because of your religion and your prosperity, and they're envious or something? That is retarded. He was just responding to the invasion, like any other person would. What you believe is what they tell you on fox news or something, wich isn't the reality at all. Do you know why the rest of the world hates the US? Because it's always sticking its nose in other countries lives.

  • @huevosteve The attacks on the twin towers is an excuse for us to fuck up the middle east? What is happening to people these days? Seriously are people losing their minds? When someone attacks a person's country someone has to be held accountable, and a message had to be sent to the world that you don't attack the US.Period. I hate Fox news by the way, I'm not a conservative or a christian. I'm an Atheist Libertarian.

  • @woopsme you're taking your apostrophes for granted.

  • @akanoez thanks, for, point, that, out.

  • @woopsme Nazis fought the "jew question" with horrible methods it's people didn't know about, because if they had known, popular support would've vanished. It's just what's happening in the US: people is finally starting to realize the government conceals and manipulates the truth, not because it's necessary for security and the common good, but because they know their actions are reprehensible. One good way to know that an action is correct is when you want people to know about it.

  • chomsky save us!

  • ALL YOU FUCKERS THAT DONT HEAR WHAT THIS MAN IS SAYING YOU ARE ALL GOING TO DIE BY THE HANDS OF YOUR GOVERNMENTS & GOOD BLOODY JOB

  • This guy isn't interviewing Chomsky, he's trying to argue with him! Which is impossible, b/c Chomksy is always right! hehe.

  • there is no lie clever enough to keep noams mouth shut, because his answers are so true, i wish there was more people like him

  • I love this man...he makes me smile and have faith again.

  • CHINA has a brutal regime

  • @MsTommyknocker @MsTommyknocker true fact. but what r u trying to say with ? China has a brutal regime so america can be brutal aswell? doesnt make any sense to me

  • Chomsky takes no shit.

  • @HIM0G chomsky feeds us shits with his persistent grey fantasies.

    I don`t blame him!He`s got to sell books and give lectures about free thinking to make a living..so he sculptures the reality to fit his needs..

  • @MrLamalo1 So you're saying that Chomsky is just making stuff up? A grey fantasy- what is that anyway? Sounds like it's not him but you're the one making stuff up.

    And speak for yourself when you say "feeds us shits" I think Chomsky tells things as he sees it. I don't see any logical reasoning in your post. He's a tenured prof. he could bugger sheep and publish it and MIT wouldn't say peep. However, he publishes erudite analysis that has documented facts. You most likely are a sheep fucker.

  • @edvvard1 Hi Mr follower of the grey guru of partial bit of truth.

    Don`t need U little man with your diminished expressive ability to B my semantic interpretor.

    I wrote what I meant and I meant what I wrote.That`s cleared,we can move on!

    The fact that someone dedicated his whole life to studies, doesn`t negate the fact that he could have political agendas or still be `wrong` in analysing/presenting his knowledge.It`s a bit like digging 4 gold with best technology but in the wrong place.Dig it?

  • @edvvard1 .."Chomsky tells things as he sees it"

    He has every right, even a duty to do so. Here's how I and many others see Prof Chomsky: a malignant anti-western parasite promulgating his twisted worldview in academia and elsewhere; a crackpot purveyor of western self-loathing who presumes to exert his enormous influence in areas where he is no sort of expert.

    Chomskyites represent a serious threat to the west, a threat more pernicious than radical islam

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @edvvard1 I used to hate Noam Chomsky.

    Then I decided to stop being a fucking idiot.

  • @edvvard1 haha. A sheep fucker indeed.

  • @edvvard1 Thats what he is for sure a sheep fucker

  • Comment removed

  • Chomsky for President

  • @bluegreen1138 Ron Paul shares with Chomsky pretty much the same ideas. Ron Paul leads the Rep Party polls. You'll concede it's easier to get Ron Paul elected than Chomsky. Right?

  • thumbs up

  • chomski is a fraud, he said the 911 wasnt an inside job, when he knos al quaida is a cia cell an always was in afg, they were main cell connecting with sis in pakistan whilk soviets where there, hes a fraud hes a disenf guy, says half truths and then leaves person in wrong way... really think a guy telling the truth would work in mit or the gov... he would be dead by now

  • @ukusapillage

    perhaps you should listen to the interview again

  • @ukusapillage "He said the 911 wasnt an inside job" No he didn't. He said it was far too dangerous for anyone to do something like this because it would have leaked out an been the end of the GOP.

  • This interviewer is a walking collection of hackneyed half-truths and moralistic babble that kills---a fine American. Chomsky's views amount to "take responsibility for your own behavior." Too much for the flag-waving pseudo-moralists dropping death wherever it's convenient to profit.

  • @TheTollundWoman Schmarrn! Es geht nur darum dass der Westen zur gleichen Zeit Suharto unterstützte. Kein mux in den westlichen Zeitungen darüber. Dass Menschen dort in Cambodien dann den starken Mann suchten nachdem die Amis 3 Millionen Tonnen Bomben auf Indochina und Kambodscha warfen, ist eine logische Konsequenz des überleben wollen. Erst Geschichte Denken, dann Schreiben.

  • noam chomsky should be sued for hatespeech and racism against america ;) YE U HEARD IT.....hes an american hating soviet loving idiott.

  • @Thastorcyclone

    In Germany its illegal to publicly deny the Nazi Holocaust. Chomsky repeatedly denied the Khmer Rouge genocide and defended Pol Pot's regime, saying that refugee reports were "atrocity stories" that couldn't be trusted. If the logic of the German law is correct, and publicly denying genocide and insulting its victims is wrong, then Chomsky would certainly be liable to prosecution.

  • i remember this guy 30 plus years ago .and he was so on it then .to the point where they wanted him gone ! love fernecktic humans !! and not phonetic sheeple

  • remove caps lock please...

  • SEIG HEIL TALLSWEDE

  • "we are defending the populations and the legitimate governments of europe" That is EXACTLY what Hitler was doing, as proven incontrovertibly by HALF of Europe descending into Bolshevism after the end of WW2. Why did the allies turn over half of Europe to Communist butchers?

  • @tallswede80 TO POLARIZE THE REGION ,WHY? TO STEM OR EVEN STOP INDUSTRY,PRODUCTION,DEVIDE & CONQUOER.TO PREOCCUPY,TO TAKE THE EYE OF THE GOAL

  • @zhyarnkatie

    RHETORICAL QUESTION, DUMBASS!

  • @tallswede80 SORRY IM FROM NZ WHAT DO I KNOW

  • WE ARE MORE FREE THAN MOST ,DUMBASS

  • @zhyarnkatie

    SO WHAT? WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN? MORE FREE THAN MOST DOESN'T MEAN FREE, NOW DOES IT? AND THE REASON THEY TURNED HALF OR EUROPE TO COMMUNISM IS THAT THE JEWS CONTROLLED BOTH RUSSIA AND US. FAILED HISTORICAL ANALYSIS FAGGOT.

  • @tallswede80 MORE FREE WHEN IT COMES TO OPINIONS WE NO HOW TO DEBATE WITHOUT THE SLANDER THERE ANDER.THANKS FOR YOUR GENERAL RAMM THERE MANN

  • @zhyarnkatie

    WHAT ARE YOU BABBLING ABOUT? WHY ARE YOU TALKING TO ME? DEBATE WITHOUT INSULTS HAS LITTLE OR NOTHING TO DO WITH FREEDOM. WHEN YOUR GOVERNMENT LIES TO YOU, THROWING INSULTS REALLY IS KIND OF A MOLEHILL ISN'T IT? YOU'RE QUITE THE LITTLE WHINER AREN'T YOU?

  • @tallswede80 JESUS IM TALKING ABOUT YOUR VERNACULAR DUMBASS ,FAGGOT,REALLY THAT SORT OF SPEECH IS FOR THE SCHOOL YARDS ..YOU USE THOSE WORDS LIKE YOU ARE SUPERIOR TO ME ,YEAH THE COUNTRY THAT I LIVE IN HAS DONE ALOT OF BAD ,BUT THROUGH DEBATE WE AS PEOPLE {MAORI THAT IS }..HAVE COME OUT ON TOP...

  • @zhyarnkatie

    SO YOU DON'T LIKE MY "VERNACULAR", EH? WELL I DON'T LIKE IT WHEN PEOPLE USE ALL CAPS IN YOUTUBE COMMENTS, WHEN THEY REPLY. IT'S FOR THE ATTENTION WHORES WHO HAVE NOTHING MEANINGFUL TO SAY. IT'S ALSO FOR THE "SCHOOL YARD", DIPSHIT. AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT I HAVE TO SAY, THEN YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE INITIATED THE CONVERSATION, AND THEN CONTINUED THE CONVERSATION. I STILL DON'T KNOW WHY YOU ARE BLUBBERING TO ME.

  • @tallswede80 ITS JUST A MOLEHILL ISNT IT,SO YOU GO BACK & SUCK YOUR MAMMAS TITTY,LITTLE BOY..

  • ALL GOOD WHEN YOU CAN HIDE MILES AWAY EH BOY

  • ITS PURE SEMANTICS ,REBELS,INSURGENCE,..HAS TAKEN THE PLACE OF FREEDOM FIGHTERS,,

  • WHATS THE DIFFERENCE ON HOW YOU KILL SOMEONE? IF YOU KILL SOMEONE YOU HAVE COMMITTED MURDER IN DEFENCE OR NOT

  • israel does not carry any attrocities in the west bank. IDF is carrying a war against terrorists with suicide bombs that blow the heads of women and children

    this fact is entirely "forgotten" by this serial liar

  • This old commie still around? I thought he was an embalmed mummy living at Red Square?

  • is noam chomsky gay??

  • I would love to see a debate between Chomsky and Obamma or Cameron/Blair. But I get the feeling that if any of our (UK) or US leaders even tried it would be a KO in the first minute and they would be exposed. Whenever I hear Chomsky speak I just think how can you disagree with the man… intelligent, polite and simply right.

  • Chomsky is right that we shouldn't be hypocrites and that the west has been hypocritical, but it doesn't mean we don't have real enemies (i.e. Islamofascits) or that we would be better off if these fanatics got their way. Whoever sees his enemy's enemy as his friend in all situations is his fool. I agree as regards Israel but if Palestine were liberated Muslims of the zealous bent would find something else to be outraged about.

  • raging debate?? dude, chomsky killed you

  • The USA has about as much blood on their hands and if not more than the Brits!! America is no better than Hitler was and the Kaiser in WWI.

  • "George Bush's favorite philosopher.. Jesus Christ" :)

  • And Obama received the nobel prize...not Chomsky....I don't want to live in this world.

  • @nikolasbelmont I personally have no respect to intelligent people, nor any respect to nobel prize. Everything and everyone who support this system is a shitface regardless of what house they own and what car they drive.

  • @nikolasbelmont Obama got a Nobel Peace Prize on a noble promise. One that he hasn't kept. Depressing isn't it?

  • @nikolasbelmont

    you think Noam Chomsky, a man who defended the Khmer Rouge, deserves the nobel peace prize? WTF??

  • @nikolasbelmont thats why awards and scores mean nothing to me

  • @nikolasbelmont You say you don't want to live in this world and you get a thumbs up, now that is sad... I'm not criticizing your comment btw.

  • @DawnofTheTruth obama can order people to kill others yet chomsky loves peace.. yet he doesn't get the prize... if that isnt sad then idk what is.

  • @sniped101 Both are equally sad...

  • Comment removed

  • poor guy, it must be difficult being so much smarter then everyone else