Hear what God of Israel YAHUSHUA-YAHUWAH (Son and Father are ONE) saying to our generation by His chosen prophets: Trumpetcallofgodonline. com ; Letter called "Purify Your Faith, and Come to the Father as It is Written": EXCERPT: "Only in the Bible and through these very Letters, of which I have given to My prophet of the end of this age, shall you find Him and know Him."
Why not Hades? Angra Mainyu? Mara? Set? Mictlantecuhtli?
Why do you believe in one evil fairytale figure and not any other? Could it be that you were already believing some other african fairly tale, until white men came to your homeland and bought you as slaves then shoved their jewish mythology down your throat? Is that why? Is that why you come off as a complete ignoramus cult fanatic religitard?
Jesus Christ is the real deal. I know, because like many others have experienced, He's visited me. You folks that don't believe in Jesus ought to consider the serious stain of sin that covers the world and who was sent here to deal with it. All I'm saying is that you should at least make an honest effort to get Jesus into your life. Just be sincere and do your best. He knows everything about you and thanks be to Almighty God, Jesus will see to it that you have a wonderful place after you die...!
@guyNbluejeans ''he has visited me'' That's what everyone claims and are unable to prove it. ''Jesus will see to it that you have a wonderful place after you die'' Nope. The people who bury me or perhaps i get killed. I'll just decompose and rot in the fucking ground!
I've had encounters with Jesus throughout my life and so that fact puts a frame around which religion is true as far as I'm concerned. But stay tuned, 'cause I'm sure that soon others will discover the reality of Jesus Christ too, as these, I believe, are the End Times.
Qhy? Because I can value the weight of evidence? Or are you only saying this because you realise that YOUR EGO has placed you on unsolid grounds? I favor the latter.
Well, in a few years, according to you, we will both know. And your claims are not new, others have made the same claims before, and they where wrong.
"You clearly are blind to the Signs of Biblical prophecy. They're ALL around!! "
If they where, we wouldnt have this discussion. And in a few years, according to you, we will both know for sure. Until then, I will dismiss your claims are those of an ignorant sheep. Or a troll.
@guyNbluejeans that may also apply to YOU, because you dont have evidence for your claims - only assertions.
And you would not be the first one to assert with conviction that YOU KNOW THE TRUTH, only to later on be shown to be a complete lune. Harold Camping comes to mind...
If the end doesnt come the way you claim, then you ARE a lune.
Several times in the Old Testament, god says to some town of people who are under seige, but protected by a wall, "I'm going to starve you until you eat your own babies".
I hate how you say you are of God, but you do not do his bidding, even though his yoke is a simple one. I tell you his day is at hand and you even scoff at that. He speaks through his book in parables and you think it is he performing these actions, when it is you who bring the judgments upon yourselves. I speak to you through his mouth that he gave, but will you listen. Read Ezekiel 33:11 he does not want you to go the way you are. But you still do Ezekiel 33:30-31, please turn!
@ndrthrdr1 It is of your opinion and your prerogative to believe that which you believe! But I tell you truly a day is coming when even the most hardened of atheists will believe in the truth about God. You don’t have to believe me now for this Truth is of no importance at this time, and another time is coming. Just watch the news around you! As it was echoed by the Prophets of long ago. Do not for get the bible reads just like a history book and there is history still to come written in it.
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
@Mogley52 IF all you say WERE true, how, logically, does that 'refute atheism' (whatever that means) or point towards a loving god who does not want you to wear clothes of mixed fabrics? IF all you say WERE true then the only logical answer to the riddle of the origin of DNA is 'AT the moment it is unexplained, as, once, was disease, planetary motion, all of chemistry/biology/physics/astronomy/cosmology.' If you fill present ignorance with 'god' you end up looking a twat.
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
mach 10 at sudden speed flying into the wind now i'm flowing at my feet something of likeness to you now i spotted you in the sun i called your name from a distance i knew you were the one i called again i do declare i can float in the air and with some love from above don't caress the weasel and don't fall too soon don't seek the blood from the panther don't take a trip to you soon
@Ciaochowbella: Dude, I agree with you BIG time! I've had the same experience with them myself, coming to my door and all adn then trying to get me to the church.
I also say do your thing, and why not, the reality is there's no cmpulsion in religion we don't care what anyone says, word up! Yet at the same time I have a lot of respect and love for Christ, not the Christ they 'teach' you about but the Christ, the real Jesus who said: I can't do anything without Allah's permission. I rspect U.
I say give the Christian a break. Since the Council of Nacea, they've found themselves trying to extricate a number of religous and social dichatomies. So yes, I do agree. There is absolutely NO god...Except, and we say, Except Him, He to whom the heavens and earth belong to, the One who evolved you from a droplet of sperm only to give you the opportunity to be able speak and say something...I'm still trying to figure out how something as pure as 'milk' comes out a system of of guts and blood..
@lastsaracen So because YOU can't understand something you need to stick god in there?
Oh, and we can give Christians a break as soon as they stop trying to influence EVERY DAMN THING they see. I don't need religious people deciding what medical procedures I can or cannot have, what science I can and cannot learn, what movies I can and cannot watch, what substances I can and cannot use or what thoughts I can and cannot have. I'll give them a break when they give ME a break.
@ciaochowbella Exactly! And I'd like to add to that list, what sexual orientation I am or am not allowed to be endowed with simply through the genetic and hormonal lottery in the womb.
@lastsaracen As pure as milk? You do realise why cow milk is pasteurised, right? That unpasteurised milk or cheese made from unpasteurised milk can give you listeriosis?
In short, it is not 'pure' in the same sense as being uncontamined.
@57worldwide Fair point. But isn't also true that you live in an artificial reality. Where people are depressed, stressed and commit suicide on a daily basis, why do you think that is? Because you're a child of the Matrix that can't escape those settings, the invisible prison. I've lived in the wilderness and drunk all cow, camel and goat milk without the need for pasteurisation and they tasted amazingly pure, wholesome and natural...
@57worldwide ...The system you live in is carefully arranged to give you a distorted verion of reality and nature as if you can't drink milk without processing it. I'm sure you heard this before and yes it's not conspiratorial, it's actually something there that you can't deny, right there in front you right now. I think you've misunderstood my original point,"something as pure as milk coming out of a system of guts, blood and urine, easy for the drinking of those who drink (i.e. babies)"
Do the unbelievers not realize that the heaven and the earth used to be one solid mass that we exploded into existence? And from water we made all living things. Would they (now) believe(Quran 21:30)
"How can you disbelieve in GOD when you were dead and He gave you life, then He puts you to death, then He brings you back to life, then to Him you ultimately return"(Quran 2:28)
W w w . c reationism. Org / articles/quotes. H t m
w w w . i c r . org/article/struggles-michael-ruse /
These 4 links for starters should make any atheist at least not make ridiculous remarks like that.
2)On the other hand,in talking about evolution,what he says is somewhat deceptive.Whichevolution?Christian disagreewith macroevolution.No one denies micro evolutionwithin the species.There is no proof for macro evolution. -MDdoesn'tknow more than the scientistson thelinks.
@outofthebox7 Science is beautiful because it constructs models (theories) that explain phenomena and make predictions that are useful.
The theory of evolution is comprised of many testable hypotheses.
If descent with cumulative change over time from a common ancestor is true, then we would expect:
The deeper, older strata of the Earth to contain fossils of simpler organisms that differ more from modern organisms than those found in the upper, more recent strata. Indeed, this is the case.
@llkeith77 Thank you for your time Likeith77. 1) Yes, we know what science is&does. The issue you want to refer t is evolutionism. 2) You made no mention on the links; evolutionists make the statements within them. 3) Here’s another one for you by a Christian: (remove spaces in between) w w w . heavenlymanna. net / christian Article. ph p? article _ i d = 9 3 -Contin-->
@llkeith77 4) The deeper, older strata of the Earth containing fossils of simpler organisms is a creationist’s evidence as well, pointing to a world flood:
w w w . earthage. Org / EarthOldor Young / scientific_evidence_for_a_worldwide _ flood . ht m
@llkeith77 6) The “phylogenetic tree”… don’t know if you heard: w w w . guardian . c o. uk / science / 2009 / jan /21 / charles - darwin - evolution - species - tree - life.
7) No, there is no macroevolution happening anywhere. You also say” “Viruses and bacteria evolve quite rapidly”, but… w w w . I c r. or g / a r t ic le / study – demonstrates – complex – cells - could/
W w w . I cr. or g / article / just-how-simple-are-bacteria / - - - >
@outofthebox7 Also, if evolution is true, then we would expect:
Those organisms that are more closely positioned to one another on the phylogenetic tree, i.e., those that have a more recent common ancestor, to share a greater similarity in the base pair sequences of their DNA. For example, the genome maps for humans and chimpanzees are approximately 96% similar.
As we map the genomes of various species, we form a comprehensive phylogenetic tree that explains the diversity of life on Earth.
@outofthebox7 I'd also like to point out that we observe evolution happening beneath our very noses. Viruses and bacteria evolve quite rapidly. This is well documented. Creationist label this "microevolution" in an attempt to distinguish it from "macroevolution."
In reality, macroevolution is just microevolution accruing over very long periods of time. Incremental changes over long time horizons lead to cumulative change.
@outofthebox7 If everything were created all at once (as depicted in the Bible), we would expect to see a mixture of all types of fossils of still living animals even in the oldest strata of the Earth. We do not find this to be the case at all. The lower strata contain older fossils of simpler life forms. As we move upward through the strata, more complex organisms appear.
Only descent with modification (evolution) explains this undeniable reality.
@llkeith77 First of all, you didn’t give time to my links of small articles. This is suspicious. So game over. I'm not going to waste my time with you further. I 'm going to refute the rest of AE. -Other than that, what you say here sounds logical, but it’s incorrect logic, since it disregards the world flood that definitely messed everything up.
@outofthebox7 I'm familiar with creationist arguments and have looked at the ICR website before. I have done my homework. There was never a worldwide flood as depicted in the Bible. If there had been, we would see a layer of flood deposits that demonstrate graded bedding. This layer would contain enormous amounts of remains from the mass die-off of all the world's wildlife.
Instead, we find distinct layers of different types of rocks with no indication of worldwide flood.
@llkeith77 No, your wrong. Your answer is in this book: w w w . creationscience. com / onlinebook /
Read online the first three chapters of part two:
*The Hydroplate theory: an overview
*The Origin of Ocean trenches, Earthquakes and The ring of fire
*Liquefaction: The origin of strata and layered fossils -If you have any questions or doubts, he is open to any debate with anyone. Go here& see his challenge: (remove in between spaces)
w w w . creationscience. com / onlinebook / index. html
@outofthebox7 Flood deposits do not form distinct layers. They form a layer with larger particles on the bottom and finer grained particles toward the top. The boundary between these different sized sedimentary particles is muddled. It basically looks like mud.
When we observe strata, we find very distinct bands of different types of rocks. This is not what we would see if a worldwide flood took place.
Why didn't a single dinosaur fossil make it to the "high ground?" If dinosaurs and people lived together (and died together in the flood), why do we never find dinosaur fossils mingled with human remains?
Why are smaller organisms so prevalent in the lower strata? In a flood, they should have sank much slower than the heavier animals. The upper strata should be dominated by smaller organisms, but they are not.
@outofthebox7 We should consider the primary source of creationists' claims. The idea that the Earth is quite young and that all organisms were created at once by a supreme being comes from an ancient book.
How did scientists construct the the theory of evolution? They observed the natural world. They used a rational approach - the scientific method - to draw their conclusions, not a book written in the Bronze Age.
The world around us is telling us that we evolved. Why not listen?
@llkeith77 1) You don’t want to listen, that’s why you didn’t give a chance to the links, that answer your comments 2) Some constructed this “theory” (to me it’s not even that) because they a) did not like the idea that a Creator made everything,since that would mean that they would give word to Him. b) were misguided by Darwin to his hypothesis. There was bias in them, being fed up with catholicism.
3)One proof that all “were created at once” is: w w w . halos. c om / index . h tm - - - >
@llkeith77 4) Well the Book written in the “Bronze age”, gives reasonable answers to the following basic questions: Why is there design order and laws everywhere? Who or what made everything? Why are we alive? Where did all forms of intelligence come from? Is there a soul (some neuroscientists starting to think there is/near death experiences/out of body experiences) that lives on? - - - - >
@llkeith77 1) Come on, what is all this?? Pal do your research on your own. I’m not going get all these answers for you. I’ve done enough. My purpose here is different (AE). Find some creation scientists in your area and ask them. Simple. They’re not hard questions. 2) You send me all these questions, why? Didn’t I say “game over” after I saw you weren’t giving any at all ( and you still haven’t!) attention to the material I gave you? Google this muslim Huran Yahya design (buy them).
@outofthebox7 Also, if God designed the universe with us in mind, it's odd that he created deadly viruses and bacteria to constantly assault us. Smallpox alone killed hundreds of millions of people before scientists developed a vaccine.
A supposedly loving God created smallpox with the foreknowledge that such a virus would lead to hundreds of millions of painful deaths.
Much of the Earth is uninhabitable. Almost every single species that ever existed has gone extinct.
@llkeith77 I’ll just comment on your last comment since it seems logical:a)The earth before the flood was completely different according to the Bible.b)God did not create the earth for “us(today)in mind”,but for a different mankind,1 that did not control the fate of the planet;the first people messed it up&are to be blamed.c)No,it’s not odd that there are viruses, prostate cancer, diseases in general, as it’s not odd there is starvation&wars. Cont- - ->
@llkeith77 I already said, -do never forget this!- Biblically**man is cut off from God**;this has its theological&biological implications. (You will never learn these things from atheists??) TheBible even speaks of curses uponthe 1st people&nature. d)Prove God Himself created the smallpox. But nevermind. - - - >
@outofthebox7 Brown claims that the upthrusting subterranean rock forced the plates to move away from the rising ridge. He says the plates reached speeds of 45 miles per hour before encountering resistance. This resistance led buckling upward (mountains) and downward (trenches).
Trenches are formed by the ongoing process of subduction, not a one-time cataclysmic event. The ocean floor plunges down into the mantle, forming ridges and recycling the crust. We observe this today as it happens.
@llkeith77 e) “Much of the earth is uninhabitable”..today! If Adam&Eve(we are their descendents)stayed under God,& evil did not spread allover(!)before the flood,we’d have no earthquakes,volcanoes, mudslides,floods&of course people polluting the earth every way they can. God would still be in control, not man,not demons.The planet would be WAY WAY different.Their sin&ours–indirectly&directly-brings literal and ethical calamities. Please get it. Weare livingthe resultsofour grand/grandparents.
@llkeith77 Evolution CANNOT give reasonable answers to these basic questions and more. w w w . newciv. org / nl / newslog. p hp / _ v5 50 / __ show _ article / _ a000550 - 000003. h t m
5) The scientific method does not give evidence for evolution. Much of that “evidence” supports creationism and the rest is easily refuted by scientists, some times even by evolutionists as I pointed out.
@outofthebox7 Here is a quote from Answers in Genesis' website:
"By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record."
Creationists believe what the Bible says regardless of any scientific findings. They start with the belief system, then offer odd theories and explanations that supports that dogma.
@outofthebox7 Scientists start by making observations of phenomena in the real world. Scientists conduct experiments to test their hypotheses. These findings are published in peer-reviewed journals and are subject to great scrutiny.
Walt Brown won't subject his hyrdroplate theory to peer review. He won't present his findings at a scientific conference. He challenges others to an open debate, but has nearly two dozen preconditions for anyone who does so.
You mentioned Walt Brown's hydroplate theory. Here are some problems.
1. He claims that the pre-flood Earth had a spherical shell of subterranean water about 1/2 mile thick. This layer was 10 miles below the Earth's surface.
Water has a density of about 1 gram per cubic centimeter. The crust has an average density 2-3 times this. How could the denser crust float on top of the much less dense water?
Brown claims the water, under extreme pressure, formed cracks in the Earth's crust. It exploded through them at supersonic speeds and traveled 20 miles upward into the atmosphere. It then rained down on the Earth for 40 days and 40 nights.
At a depth of 10 miles (where the water supposedly was), the Earth is about 400 degrees Centigrade. The water that escaped would have been boiling hot. It wouldn't have left the crust as water, but as steam.
@outofthebox7 Brown's theory claims that the jutting geysers of water eroded the crust as they shot upward. This eroded crust was deposited over the land and is responsible for the strata we view today.
Brown's model fails to explain how coral reefs hundreds of feet thick and several miles long could have been preserved with fossils beneath them.
His model doesn't explain strata such as chalky limestone, which is formed by billions of microscopic coccoliths over vast stretches of time.
@outofthebox7 Brown also claims that the water blasting through the cracks in the Earth widened those cracks. As the water escaped, the rock of the subterranean chambers pushed up, forming the mid-oceanic ridge.
The mid-oceanic ridge is the result of ongoing volcanic activity, not a one-time cataclysmic event in the past. Magma flows upward from the mantle. It comes out of the ridge as lava, forming new ocean crust and spreading the seafloor. We observe this happening today.
3:22 “Evolution is a fact!” -WHAT??He wishes it was.Evolution is a dangerous doctrine of faith.Thereare scientistswho were evolutionists thatstopped believing inevolution.
w w w . creationists. org / former-evoltionists-who-became-young-earth-creation-scientists. ht ml
w w w. strengthsandweaknesses. org / Weaknesses / evol_quotes. h tm
3:00 “Do you believe in unicorns?” –No. “Why?” This is arrogance and blindness at its worse and of course it sells to people who want to stay ignorant. Comparing it with the issue of the existence of a Creator, when there’s so much order and laws and design around?? When there’s intelligence, out of body experiences, the spirit world, miracle workers. (no, not talking about fakes or placebo).
Indeed, the Bible is right when it says they are fools. They’re just being smart alecs.
1:38“Why would any loving being, order anything like that? [slavery, genocide, infanticide] Would you?!” So,because God is supposedly unloving, therefore the Bible is wrong.Please people!Could it be,that he wants to make a point (..!) that he is not alwaysloving but also wrathful to thosewho –after warning-stillstand against Him?The God that only loves,is ignorantChristian's God,NOT THE BIBLE ONE. PERIOD. In all honesty, you can love Him or leave Him, either way, He's going to get His way. Yep.
this is kinda dumb they talk to the most ignorant people in the world i think there show would be better if they talked to someone who was educated i dont think they would put up any better of an arument lol but it would be easier to listin to
@t0nyram I agree, and in their own way by doing just that they're acting like the religious loons who try to force feed you religion, but just in the athiest direction.
Say;You are a Christian and a true believer thats fine.Now,suppose you were not born on that same place.say a Muslim country anywhere were you want.Were you raised as a Christian? No.. ! So what matters your mind was influenced on the moment you were born(surroundings,parents ect).
Which means you could be a atheist aswell,which concludes that we are all infected with our surroundings,and God got nothing to do with it.Atheists dont wanna be influenced.Not even by 'God'
Matt: "I'm vaccinated against smallpox so all of you who would like for god to demonstrate his power could just pray for him to hit me with smallpox."
Umm, Matt you should be careful for what you are wishing for. Smallpox vaccine wears off over time. Although you still maintain a resistance to smallpox you can still get the disease pretty severely. In fact the last person to die from smallpox was Janet Park. She had previously been vaccinated against smallpox.
A question for atheists. In a world where there's no proof of God's existence or of life after death; how will you explain to your children why you brought them into the world and why they should die?
You atheists are so sad. Many of you were christians but didnt go all the way. You fell in love with sin and said goodbye to God bc he wasnt making u as happy as sin was. SO u sought out way to justify your evil and con youselves into believing there is no hell. Satan said to Eve "You surely shall not die". The rest just rebelled against false religion and the misery it brings.
@ornivb 1. There are many teachings about God but only one God. The teachings that labels God as Zues is erroreous and false.
2. But when I believed Jesus that God was personal and knowable for all who would confess the utter failure of running their own lives and embrace Gods control of their lives, I then received the love of God and it was the most awesome thing that I had, have, and do experience anywhere and ever.
3. The teaching about Zues never states that God is knowable in such a way.
@j919or Jesus promised the end of wicked people, Odin promised the end of ice giants. Which one kept their promise? I don't see any ice giants around.
PS my god will battle your god anyday and is way better than yours in all aspects. I receive so much love(hullucinations) from him sometimes that my brain explodes.
@CntrBrdr Unless I see your brain with my own eyes, I will not believe you have a brain--that's how atheists reason. Resemblence is another problem atheists have everytime they see two or more things alike.
according to modern physics, everything that exists in the mind, exists in reality, therefore God exists, as well unicorns and elves, if only in your mind
Read the Holographic universe
Terence Mckenna once said he was an atheist, until he smoked DMT
@Edubbplate Except those things are only real *to you*. God is every bit real to those who believe in him, they see his influence everywhere, to the true believers it's glaring them in the face, but personal perceptions are not evidence and personal experience is only applicable to yourself.
@override367 Get up to date on modern physics. Quantum Nonlocality, Entanglement, etc. Read any Psychedic guru and he'll tell you there is something else...what that is can differ. So they're all true. The idea of God CAN exist and not exist at the same time. There is no paradox. The only truth is that all is true. Good comment by the way, well written. But I don't think you're getting the point. Look to much smarter people than me to explain these things. READ read read.
i didn't know about this atheist experience, i consider myself in heaven! LOL XD damn it sucks to live in a third world country ruled by the catholic efffin' church :( ugh!!!!! At least i can see america has its own religious nuts itself :S
i made a packt with the devil that i could torture all the christians in hell whos goin to expose hatred toward me, oh yea plus he said female angels in hell are hot and sluty, and i get the honor to chat with dawkins.
@shootomatic I totally agree. They all start sounding the same after 30 mins. Can we get a theologian, a historian, a theistic scientist, a professor, something? There are in actuality a few arguments for god's existence. They aren't good arguments, and are filled with holes, but they ARE there. That's just it, though. Most Catholic defense comes from attacking credibility in atheist opinion, as if Catholic opinion gets to win by default.
@shootomatic Well, you've gotta remember this is a once a week-low budget show based in Austin, it's not that easy to get someone with half a brain on the show.
@hanspeterpitsch He said 'as long as there's an 'or' in there, yes'. Because the question was asking sodomy or homosexuality. Because there's the 'or' he's saying he's done one but not the other.
@MrRoboto81 Ah so you don't believe at one point in time Unicorns could have existed.. i suppose you don't believe in dinosaurs either, Apatosaurs are in the bible...
I love the fact that you guys are soo calm and all these so called christians are soo rudem anything but christ-like.... kepp up the good work guys.... Viva Science and rational thinking!!!!!!!!!!!!
"sodomy or homosexuality?"---"as long as there's an 'or' in there."
zpr880 1 week ago
Haha we love to sin... I LOVE THESE VIDEOS
Twizzlwizzl 2 weeks ago 2
@Glory2god143 It's called a cat scan. I guess you don't have a dick since no one can see it then, right?
SeveredRebel 3 weeks ago
Athiest believe people have brains yet (you cant see em) Christians believe GOD created the brain!! GO FIGURE!!!!
Glory2God143 3 weeks ago
@Glory2God143 what? We can see brains.
TarousDT 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Glory2God143 what? We can see brains.
TarousDT 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hear what God of Israel YAHUSHUA-YAHUWAH (Son and Father are ONE) saying to our generation by His chosen prophets: Trumpetcallofgodonline. com ; Letter called "Purify Your Faith, and Come to the Father as It is Written": EXCERPT: "Only in the Bible and through these very Letters, of which I have given to My prophet of the end of this age, shall you find Him and know Him."
Watch:
" youtube.com/watch?v=YZPmTH6sloo"
"youtube.com/watch?v=lutJYDxP6ys"
"youtube.com/watch?v=R9ike7PKd8U"
Regards.
TrumpetCallofGodLT 4 weeks ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
hahahhahaHAHAHAHAH "yeah you the devil man" BAHHAHAHAHAHAHHA
ukatam 4 weeks ago
doctor Hibbert laugh at the end
xonktrof1 1 month ago
"yeah you the devil man"
Why not Hades? Angra Mainyu? Mara? Set? Mictlantecuhtli?
Why do you believe in one evil fairytale figure and not any other? Could it be that you were already believing some other african fairly tale, until white men came to your homeland and bought you as slaves then shoved their jewish mythology down your throat? Is that why? Is that why you come off as a complete ignoramus cult fanatic religitard?
bigredphenom 1 month ago 8
fits in your butt
dayati 1 month ago 4
3:30... xkcd shirt... win
canadianpearable 2 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
2:56 Priceless!
mvanroy 2 months ago
Jesus Christ is the real deal. I know, because like many others have experienced, He's visited me. You folks that don't believe in Jesus ought to consider the serious stain of sin that covers the world and who was sent here to deal with it. All I'm saying is that you should at least make an honest effort to get Jesus into your life. Just be sincere and do your best. He knows everything about you and thanks be to Almighty God, Jesus will see to it that you have a wonderful place after you die...!
guyNbluejeans 2 months ago
@guyNbluejeans obvious troll is obvious
APRIME 2 months ago
@guyNbluejeans ''he has visited me'' That's what everyone claims and are unable to prove it. ''Jesus will see to it that you have a wonderful place after you die'' Nope. The people who bury me or perhaps i get killed. I'll just decompose and rot in the fucking ground!
MarcusEFN 2 months ago
@guyNbluejeans you should make an honest effort to try to understand reality, and not make silly excuses in order to avoid reality.
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
@MagnusNyborg
I've had encounters with Jesus throughout my life and so that fact puts a frame around which religion is true as far as I'm concerned. But stay tuned, 'cause I'm sure that soon others will discover the reality of Jesus Christ too, as these, I believe, are the End Times.
guyNbluejeans 2 months ago
@guyNbluejeans "...as these, I believe, are the End Times"
Good, so if nothing happens in the next few years, will you stop making foolish claims?
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
@MagnusNyborg In the next few years?? Sure. In the mean time I highly suggest that you get right with the Savior of the World.
guyNbluejeans 2 months ago
@guyNbluejeans "In the next few years?? Sure"
Good, we have a deal - I expect you to honor your part.
In the meanwhile, i already realise the nonsense in your claims, and I will await real evidence before I make a leap-of-faith.
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
@MagnusNyborg Your ego is too much.
guyNbluejeans 2 months ago
@guyNbluejeans "Your ego is too much"
Qhy? Because I can value the weight of evidence? Or are you only saying this because you realise that YOUR EGO has placed you on unsolid grounds? I favor the latter.
Well, in a few years, according to you, we will both know. And your claims are not new, others have made the same claims before, and they where wrong.
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
@MagnusNyborg "They have eyes, but they don't see. They have ears, but they don't hear."
You clearly are blind to the Signs of Biblical prophecy. They're ALL around!!
guyNbluejeans 2 months ago
@guyNbluejeans christianity can make sheep out of men!
"You clearly are blind to the Signs of Biblical prophecy. They're ALL around!! "
If they where, we wouldnt have this discussion. And in a few years, according to you, we will both know for sure. Until then, I will dismiss your claims are those of an ignorant sheep. Or a troll.
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
@MagnusNyborg Clever way to deal with the Truth, when it creeps up on you!
guyNbluejeans 2 months ago
@guyNbluejeans that may also apply to YOU, because you dont have evidence for your claims - only assertions.
And you would not be the first one to assert with conviction that YOU KNOW THE TRUTH, only to later on be shown to be a complete lune. Harold Camping comes to mind...
If the end doesnt come the way you claim, then you ARE a lune.
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
@MagnusNyborg I never stated that I had evidence. So what's the problem?
And isn't it telling that you never asked me about "the Signs of the times"??
guyNbluejeans 2 months ago
@guyNbluejeans "I never stated that I had evidence"
If you dont have evidence, why the fuck would i believe you??
And isnt it telling that you make claims without evidence?
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
"It fits in your butt!"
Theamazingatheist agrees.
Ichiboy900 2 months ago
1:49 he forgot canablism.
Several times in the Old Testament, god says to some town of people who are under seige, but protected by a wall, "I'm going to starve you until you eat your own babies".
Real nice guy.
SinnFein4ever 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Darwin, was a liar. Check out the truth behind his work. Youtube: DARK SIDE DARWINISM
Ratacon2004 3 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
o american christians, thank you for the laughs
Smeagollum86 3 months ago
@ 0:46 that's Dillahunty's future wife.
All hail Poe!
jdubbs530 3 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
FUCK LIFE, ITS ALL GOOD!
greekpanther1 3 months ago
yehh you the devil man. PAHA!!!! WHAT A LEGEND i love crazy christians this is what makes this show
hobbohippy2 3 months ago 22
I hate how you say you are of God, but you do not do his bidding, even though his yoke is a simple one. I tell you his day is at hand and you even scoff at that. He speaks through his book in parables and you think it is he performing these actions, when it is you who bring the judgments upon yourselves. I speak to you through his mouth that he gave, but will you listen. Read Ezekiel 33:11 he does not want you to go the way you are. But you still do Ezekiel 33:30-31, please turn!
Idotgotit 3 months ago
@Idotgotit It's been 2,000 years. When are you going to realize that Jesus was a cult leader, and that he's never coming back?
Can't you take a hint?
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago
@ndrthrdr1 It is of your opinion and your prerogative to believe that which you believe! But I tell you truly a day is coming when even the most hardened of atheists will believe in the truth about God. You don’t have to believe me now for this Truth is of no importance at this time, and another time is coming. Just watch the news around you! As it was echoed by the Prophets of long ago. Do not for get the bible reads just like a history book and there is history still to come written in it.
Idotgotit 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 4 months ago
AAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! WICKED!
dudokozle 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
@Mogley52 IF all you say WERE true, how, logically, does that 'refute atheism' (whatever that means) or point towards a loving god who does not want you to wear clothes of mixed fabrics? IF all you say WERE true then the only logical answer to the riddle of the origin of DNA is 'AT the moment it is unexplained, as, once, was disease, planetary motion, all of chemistry/biology/physics/astronomy/cosmology.' If you fill present ignorance with 'god' you end up looking a twat.
derek24hudson 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
Mogley52 4 months ago
Oh God, Oh Jesus, Oh Holy Ghost!
That Unicorn part was HILARIOUS
JDMadu 4 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
LOL, the banana fits in your but! :))
sergheiadrian 4 months ago
The ultimate Ray Comfort retort: yeah, that banana also fits up your butt! That should be carved in stone somewhere.
ChipArgyle 4 months ago
mach 10 at sudden speed flying into the wind now i'm flowing at my feet something of likeness to you now i spotted you in the sun i called your name from a distance i knew you were the one i called again i do declare i can float in the air and with some love from above don't caress the weasel and don't fall too soon don't seek the blood from the panther don't take a trip to you soon
unclechipper 4 months ago
@Ciaochowbella: Dude, I agree with you BIG time! I've had the same experience with them myself, coming to my door and all adn then trying to get me to the church.
I also say do your thing, and why not, the reality is there's no cmpulsion in religion we don't care what anyone says, word up! Yet at the same time I have a lot of respect and love for Christ, not the Christ they 'teach' you about but the Christ, the real Jesus who said: I can't do anything without Allah's permission. I rspect U.
lastsaracen 4 months ago
I say give the Christian a break. Since the Council of Nacea, they've found themselves trying to extricate a number of religous and social dichatomies. So yes, I do agree. There is absolutely NO god...Except, and we say, Except Him, He to whom the heavens and earth belong to, the One who evolved you from a droplet of sperm only to give you the opportunity to be able speak and say something...I'm still trying to figure out how something as pure as 'milk' comes out a system of of guts and blood..
lastsaracen 4 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
@lastsaracen So because YOU can't understand something you need to stick god in there?
Oh, and we can give Christians a break as soon as they stop trying to influence EVERY DAMN THING they see. I don't need religious people deciding what medical procedures I can or cannot have, what science I can and cannot learn, what movies I can and cannot watch, what substances I can and cannot use or what thoughts I can and cannot have. I'll give them a break when they give ME a break.
ciaochowbella 4 months ago
@ciaochowbella Exactly! And I'd like to add to that list, what sexual orientation I am or am not allowed to be endowed with simply through the genetic and hormonal lottery in the womb.
EdM021 4 months ago
@lastsaracen As pure as milk? You do realise why cow milk is pasteurised, right? That unpasteurised milk or cheese made from unpasteurised milk can give you listeriosis?
In short, it is not 'pure' in the same sense as being uncontamined.
57worldwide 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@57worldwide Fair point. But isn't also true that you live in an artificial reality. Where people are depressed, stressed and commit suicide on a daily basis, why do you think that is? Because you're a child of the Matrix that can't escape those settings, the invisible prison. I've lived in the wilderness and drunk all cow, camel and goat milk without the need for pasteurisation and they tasted amazingly pure, wholesome and natural...
lastsaracen 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@57worldwide ...The system you live in is carefully arranged to give you a distorted verion of reality and nature as if you can't drink milk without processing it. I'm sure you heard this before and yes it's not conspiratorial, it's actually something there that you can't deny, right there in front you right now. I think you've misunderstood my original point,"something as pure as milk coming out of a system of guts, blood and urine, easy for the drinking of those who drink (i.e. babies)"
lastsaracen 4 months ago
I'll never understand how believers can get there minds around the following:
-God created mankind, in his image, with intelligence and curiosity
-God gave mankind free will
-By applying the above two, logical people find it impossible to believe in God
-God punishes non-believers for exercising the common sense and free will he bestowed on them
-God rewards those who dismiss these gifts and believe in him arbitrarily
...and that's religion. I don't expect explanations.
carmium 4 months ago 59
This has been flagged as spam show
God created the Big Bang
Do the unbelievers not realize that the heaven and the earth used to be one solid mass that we exploded into existence? And from water we made all living things. Would they (now) believe(Quran 21:30)
"How can you disbelieve in GOD when you were dead and He gave you life, then He puts you to death, then He brings you back to life, then to Him you ultimately return"(Quran 2:28)
QuranicIslam101 4 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
2# Continues:
W w w . c reationism. Org / articles/quotes. H t m
w w w . i c r . org/article/struggles-michael-ruse /
These 4 links for starters should make any atheist at least not make ridiculous remarks like that.
2)On the other hand,in talking about evolution,what he says is somewhat deceptive.Whichevolution?Christian disagreewith macroevolution.No one denies micro evolutionwithin the species.There is no proof for macro evolution. -MDdoesn'tknow more than the scientistson thelinks.
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 you are a fun moron
KKDragonLord 5 months ago
@KKDragonLord Get over it & get well soon.
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 likewise
KKDragonLord 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 Science is beautiful because it constructs models (theories) that explain phenomena and make predictions that are useful.
The theory of evolution is comprised of many testable hypotheses.
If descent with cumulative change over time from a common ancestor is true, then we would expect:
The deeper, older strata of the Earth to contain fossils of simpler organisms that differ more from modern organisms than those found in the upper, more recent strata. Indeed, this is the case.
llkeith77 5 months ago
@llkeith77 Thank you for your time Likeith77. 1) Yes, we know what science is&does. The issue you want to refer t is evolutionism. 2) You made no mention on the links; evolutionists make the statements within them. 3) Here’s another one for you by a Christian: (remove spaces in between) w w w . heavenlymanna. net / christian Article. ph p? article _ i d = 9 3 -Contin-->
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@llkeith77 4) The deeper, older strata of the Earth containing fossils of simpler organisms is a creationist’s evidence as well, pointing to a world flood:
w w w . earthage. Org / EarthOldor Young / scientific_evidence_for_a_worldwide _ flood . ht m
“Indeed this is the case.” - ->
outofthebox7 5 months ago
Comment removed
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@llkeith77 6) The “phylogenetic tree”… don’t know if you heard: w w w . guardian . c o. uk / science / 2009 / jan /21 / charles - darwin - evolution - species - tree - life.
7) No, there is no macroevolution happening anywhere. You also say” “Viruses and bacteria evolve quite rapidly”, but… w w w . I c r. or g / a r t ic le / study – demonstrates – complex – cells - could/
W w w . I cr. or g / article / just-how-simple-are-bacteria / - - - >
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@llkeith77 8) You say “macroevolution is just microevolution accruing over very long periods of time.” Look at what these evolutionists said:
w w w . I c r. or g / articles / view / 696 / 220
w w w . i c r . or g / a r t i c le/what - difference - between - macroevolution - microevolut/
w w w . ic r. or g / article / fruit - flies - face - macroevolution/
I put in time to finding the above links for you, so at least for your sake, you give time to them.
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 Also, if evolution is true, then we would expect:
Those organisms that are more closely positioned to one another on the phylogenetic tree, i.e., those that have a more recent common ancestor, to share a greater similarity in the base pair sequences of their DNA. For example, the genome maps for humans and chimpanzees are approximately 96% similar.
As we map the genomes of various species, we form a comprehensive phylogenetic tree that explains the diversity of life on Earth.
llkeith77 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 I'd also like to point out that we observe evolution happening beneath our very noses. Viruses and bacteria evolve quite rapidly. This is well documented. Creationist label this "microevolution" in an attempt to distinguish it from "macroevolution."
In reality, macroevolution is just microevolution accruing over very long periods of time. Incremental changes over long time horizons lead to cumulative change.
llkeith77 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 If everything were created all at once (as depicted in the Bible), we would expect to see a mixture of all types of fossils of still living animals even in the oldest strata of the Earth. We do not find this to be the case at all. The lower strata contain older fossils of simpler life forms. As we move upward through the strata, more complex organisms appear.
Only descent with modification (evolution) explains this undeniable reality.
llkeith77 5 months ago
@llkeith77 First of all, you didn’t give time to my links of small articles. This is suspicious. So game over. I'm not going to waste my time with you further. I 'm going to refute the rest of AE. -Other than that, what you say here sounds logical, but it’s incorrect logic, since it disregards the world flood that definitely messed everything up.
Do your homework pal, I provide alot. Peace.
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 I'm familiar with creationist arguments and have looked at the ICR website before. I have done my homework. There was never a worldwide flood as depicted in the Bible. If there had been, we would see a layer of flood deposits that demonstrate graded bedding. This layer would contain enormous amounts of remains from the mass die-off of all the world's wildlife.
Instead, we find distinct layers of different types of rocks with no indication of worldwide flood.
llkeith77 5 months ago
@llkeith77 No, your wrong. Your answer is in this book: w w w . creationscience. com / onlinebook /
Read online the first three chapters of part two:
*The Hydroplate theory: an overview
*The Origin of Ocean trenches, Earthquakes and The ring of fire
*Liquefaction: The origin of strata and layered fossils -If you have any questions or doubts, he is open to any debate with anyone. Go here& see his challenge: (remove in between spaces)
w w w . creationscience. com / onlinebook / index. html
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 Flood deposits do not form distinct layers. They form a layer with larger particles on the bottom and finer grained particles toward the top. The boundary between these different sized sedimentary particles is muddled. It basically looks like mud.
When we observe strata, we find very distinct bands of different types of rocks. This is not what we would see if a worldwide flood took place.
llkeith77 5 months ago
@outofthebox7
Why didn't a single dinosaur fossil make it to the "high ground?" If dinosaurs and people lived together (and died together in the flood), why do we never find dinosaur fossils mingled with human remains?
Why are smaller organisms so prevalent in the lower strata? In a flood, they should have sank much slower than the heavier animals. The upper strata should be dominated by smaller organisms, but they are not.
llkeith77 5 months ago
Comment removed
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 We should consider the primary source of creationists' claims. The idea that the Earth is quite young and that all organisms were created at once by a supreme being comes from an ancient book.
How did scientists construct the the theory of evolution? They observed the natural world. They used a rational approach - the scientific method - to draw their conclusions, not a book written in the Bronze Age.
The world around us is telling us that we evolved. Why not listen?
llkeith77 5 months ago
@llkeith77 1) You don’t want to listen, that’s why you didn’t give a chance to the links, that answer your comments 2) Some constructed this “theory” (to me it’s not even that) because they a) did not like the idea that a Creator made everything,since that would mean that they would give word to Him. b) were misguided by Darwin to his hypothesis. There was bias in them, being fed up with catholicism.
3)One proof that all “were created at once” is: w w w . halos. c om / index . h tm - - - >
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@llkeith77 4) Well the Book written in the “Bronze age”, gives reasonable answers to the following basic questions: Why is there design order and laws everywhere? Who or what made everything? Why are we alive? Where did all forms of intelligence come from? Is there a soul (some neuroscientists starting to think there is/near death experiences/out of body experiences) that lives on? - - - - >
outofthebox7 5 months ago
Arguments from design are shaky because we see much in our world that is sub-optimal.
For example, a woman's egg can implant into her fallopian tube in an ectopic pregnancy.
The pharynx is used for breathing and eating. This makes us prone to choking.
The urethra runs through the prostate, leading to problems with urination because the prostate becomes enlarged later in life.
Consider flightless birds, cave dwelling creatures with useless eyes, and whales with small hind limbs.
llkeith77 5 months ago
Comment removed
outofthebox7 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@llkeith77 1) Come on, what is all this?? Pal do your research on your own. I’m not going get all these answers for you. I’ve done enough. My purpose here is different (AE). Find some creation scientists in your area and ask them. Simple. They’re not hard questions. 2) You send me all these questions, why? Didn’t I say “game over” after I saw you weren’t giving any at all ( and you still haven’t!) attention to the material I gave you? Google this muslim Huran Yahya design (buy them).
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 Also, if God designed the universe with us in mind, it's odd that he created deadly viruses and bacteria to constantly assault us. Smallpox alone killed hundreds of millions of people before scientists developed a vaccine.
A supposedly loving God created smallpox with the foreknowledge that such a virus would lead to hundreds of millions of painful deaths.
Much of the Earth is uninhabitable. Almost every single species that ever existed has gone extinct.
Some design.
llkeith77 5 months ago
@llkeith77 I’ll just comment on your last comment since it seems logical:a)The earth before the flood was completely different according to the Bible.b)God did not create the earth for “us(today)in mind”,but for a different mankind,1 that did not control the fate of the planet;the first people messed it up&are to be blamed.c)No,it’s not odd that there are viruses, prostate cancer, diseases in general, as it’s not odd there is starvation&wars. Cont- - ->
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@llkeith77 I already said, -do never forget this!- Biblically**man is cut off from God**;this has its theological&biological implications. (You will never learn these things from atheists??) TheBible even speaks of curses uponthe 1st people&nature. d)Prove God Himself created the smallpox. But nevermind. - - - >
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 Brown claims that the upthrusting subterranean rock forced the plates to move away from the rising ridge. He says the plates reached speeds of 45 miles per hour before encountering resistance. This resistance led buckling upward (mountains) and downward (trenches).
Trenches are formed by the ongoing process of subduction, not a one-time cataclysmic event. The ocean floor plunges down into the mantle, forming ridges and recycling the crust. We observe this today as it happens.
llkeith77 5 months ago
@llkeith77 e) “Much of the earth is uninhabitable”..today! If Adam&Eve(we are their descendents)stayed under God,& evil did not spread allover(!)before the flood,we’d have no earthquakes,volcanoes, mudslides,floods&of course people polluting the earth every way they can. God would still be in control, not man,not demons.The planet would be WAY WAY different.Their sin&ours–indirectly&directly-brings literal and ethical calamities. Please get it. Weare livingthe resultsofour grand/grandparents.
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@llkeith77 Evolution CANNOT give reasonable answers to these basic questions and more. w w w . newciv. org / nl / newslog. p hp / _ v5 50 / __ show _ article / _ a000550 - 000003. h t m
5) The scientific method does not give evidence for evolution. Much of that “evidence” supports creationism and the rest is easily refuted by scientists, some times even by evolutionists as I pointed out.
outofthebox7 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 Here is a quote from Answers in Genesis' website:
"By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record."
Creationists believe what the Bible says regardless of any scientific findings. They start with the belief system, then offer odd theories and explanations that supports that dogma.
Science does not work this way.
llkeith77 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 Scientists start by making observations of phenomena in the real world. Scientists conduct experiments to test their hypotheses. These findings are published in peer-reviewed journals and are subject to great scrutiny.
Walt Brown won't subject his hyrdroplate theory to peer review. He won't present his findings at a scientific conference. He challenges others to an open debate, but has nearly two dozen preconditions for anyone who does so.
llkeith77 5 months ago
You mentioned Walt Brown's hydroplate theory. Here are some problems.
1. He claims that the pre-flood Earth had a spherical shell of subterranean water about 1/2 mile thick. This layer was 10 miles below the Earth's surface.
Water has a density of about 1 gram per cubic centimeter. The crust has an average density 2-3 times this. How could the denser crust float on top of the much less dense water?
llkeith77 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 More on hyrdoplate "theory."
Brown claims the water, under extreme pressure, formed cracks in the Earth's crust. It exploded through them at supersonic speeds and traveled 20 miles upward into the atmosphere. It then rained down on the Earth for 40 days and 40 nights.
At a depth of 10 miles (where the water supposedly was), the Earth is about 400 degrees Centigrade. The water that escaped would have been boiling hot. It wouldn't have left the crust as water, but as steam.
llkeith77 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 Brown's theory claims that the jutting geysers of water eroded the crust as they shot upward. This eroded crust was deposited over the land and is responsible for the strata we view today.
Brown's model fails to explain how coral reefs hundreds of feet thick and several miles long could have been preserved with fossils beneath them.
His model doesn't explain strata such as chalky limestone, which is formed by billions of microscopic coccoliths over vast stretches of time.
llkeith77 5 months ago
@outofthebox7 Brown also claims that the water blasting through the cracks in the Earth widened those cracks. As the water escaped, the rock of the subterranean chambers pushed up, forming the mid-oceanic ridge.
The mid-oceanic ridge is the result of ongoing volcanic activity, not a one-time cataclysmic event in the past. Magma flows upward from the mantle. It comes out of the ridge as lava, forming new ocean crust and spreading the seafloor. We observe this happening today.
llkeith77 5 months ago
3:22 “Evolution is a fact!” -WHAT??He wishes it was.Evolution is a dangerous doctrine of faith.Thereare scientistswho were evolutionists thatstopped believing inevolution.
w w w . creationists. org / former-evoltionists-who-became-young-earth-creation-scientists. ht ml
w w w. strengthsandweaknesses. org / Weaknesses / evol_quotes. h tm
Continues:
outofthebox7 5 months ago
3:00 “Do you believe in unicorns?” –No. “Why?” This is arrogance and blindness at its worse and of course it sells to people who want to stay ignorant. Comparing it with the issue of the existence of a Creator, when there’s so much order and laws and design around?? When there’s intelligence, out of body experiences, the spirit world, miracle workers. (no, not talking about fakes or placebo).
Indeed, the Bible is right when it says they are fools. They’re just being smart alecs.
outofthebox7 5 months ago
1:38“Why would any loving being, order anything like that? [slavery, genocide, infanticide] Would you?!” So,because God is supposedly unloving, therefore the Bible is wrong.Please people!Could it be,that he wants to make a point (..!) that he is not alwaysloving but also wrathful to thosewho –after warning-stillstand against Him?The God that only loves,is ignorantChristian's God,NOT THE BIBLE ONE. PERIOD. In all honesty, you can love Him or leave Him, either way, He's going to get His way. Yep.
outofthebox7 5 months ago
Comment removed
outofthebox7 5 months ago
the bible was written and edited at the council of nicea
effrin999 5 months ago
this is kinda dumb they talk to the most ignorant people in the world i think there show would be better if they talked to someone who was educated i dont think they would put up any better of an arument lol but it would be easier to listin to
t0nyram 5 months ago
@t0nyram I agree, and in their own way by doing just that they're acting like the religious loons who try to force feed you religion, but just in the athiest direction.
Vr4z1el 5 months ago
0:01 Holy shit! It's the old guy from Family Guy!
koolanator 5 months ago
I'm a true Atheist.
Say;You are a Christian and a true believer thats fine.Now,suppose you were not born on that same place.say a Muslim country anywhere were you want.Were you raised as a Christian? No.. ! So what matters your mind was influenced on the moment you were born(surroundings,parents ect).
Which means you could be a atheist aswell,which concludes that we are all infected with our surroundings,and God got nothing to do with it.Atheists dont wanna be influenced.Not even by 'God'
Flash4ever2007 5 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
Matt: "I'm vaccinated against smallpox so all of you who would like for god to demonstrate his power could just pray for him to hit me with smallpox."
Umm, Matt you should be careful for what you are wishing for. Smallpox vaccine wears off over time. Although you still maintain a resistance to smallpox you can still get the disease pretty severely. In fact the last person to die from smallpox was Janet Park. She had previously been vaccinated against smallpox.
squareatheist 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
But now, Atheists, tell me WHY are you in this world?
Airlightf 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A question for atheists. In a world where there's no proof of God's existence or of life after death; how will you explain to your children why you brought them into the world and why they should die?
QuestionForAtheists 6 months ago
You atheists are so sad. Many of you were christians but didnt go all the way. You fell in love with sin and said goodbye to God bc he wasnt making u as happy as sin was. SO u sought out way to justify your evil and con youselves into believing there is no hell. Satan said to Eve "You surely shall not die". The rest just rebelled against false religion and the misery it brings.
j919or 6 months ago
@j919or once you accept zeus, you will know he is real in your heart. Why can't you accept zeus' love?
ornivb 6 months ago
@ornivb 1. There are many teachings about God but only one God. The teachings that labels God as Zues is erroreous and false.
2. But when I believed Jesus that God was personal and knowable for all who would confess the utter failure of running their own lives and embrace Gods control of their lives, I then received the love of God and it was the most awesome thing that I had, have, and do experience anywhere and ever.
3. The teaching about Zues never states that God is knowable in such a way.
j919or 6 months ago
@j919or Jesus promised the end of wicked people, Odin promised the end of ice giants. Which one kept their promise? I don't see any ice giants around.
PS my god will battle your god anyday and is way better than yours in all aspects. I receive so much love(hullucinations) from him sometimes that my brain explodes.
ornivb 6 months ago
@ornivb That's what I am saying, why can't you accept Zeu's love? Hehehe. LOL. om Atheists friends
Airlightf 6 months ago
@j919or slow clap.....1/10 would not read again
CntrBrdr 6 months ago
@CntrBrdr Do you have a brain?
Airlightf 6 months ago
@Airlightf what an interesting question! I suppose you could make wild guesses either way. Although, I do often resemble a scarecrow.....
CntrBrdr 6 months ago
@CntrBrdr Unless I see your brain with my own eyes, I will not believe you have a brain--that's how atheists reason. Resemblence is another problem atheists have everytime they see two or more things alike.
Airlightf 6 months ago
@Airlightf Thanks very much for your comments.
CntrBrdr 6 months ago
@j919or
try harder, troll.
LegalHeroin 6 months ago
This show is so fucking awesome. Jesus is probablly watching it right now laughing his ass off.
kittykatBflat 6 months ago
Why are atheists called children of the Big Band (Father) and Chance (mother) ?
Airlightf 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Atheists, all of them, can be easily dismissed with a single phrase: I am sorry Atheists but I am a rational being--human being :D
Airlightf 6 months ago
I am sorry atheists but I am not going to take your personal [Cheap/99cent] opinions as evidence that god doesn’t exist.Sorry
Airlightf 6 months ago
@Airlightf No one expects you to. Take the facts presented instead. The facts are there is no proof of God.
fletchers4 6 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
@Airlightf does anything not exist for you?
ornivb 6 months ago
@Airlightf you're twice sorry. Interesting.
CntrBrdr 6 months ago
3:16 he reminds me a lot of billy mays
preragh 6 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
Did you guys know that the word "unicorn" is used in the bible 8 times!
najma50000 6 months ago
LOOOL that hat :D
DeeDub02 6 months ago
Thinking for yourself and examining the world around you is never wrong.
Great stuff guys.. keep up the good work. Make them think.. if nothing else.
PaleHearse 6 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
Gotta love Matt :D
JUSTHELLBENT 6 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
what could be more rational that knowing science, can you answer where did matter come from? and such a complex universe can't happen on its own
MrShahidagha 6 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
Bronze age bollocks.
dilwich123 7 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
according to modern physics, everything that exists in the mind, exists in reality, therefore God exists, as well unicorns and elves, if only in your mind
Read the Holographic universe
Terence Mckenna once said he was an atheist, until he smoked DMT
Edubbplate 7 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
@Edubbplate Except those things are only real *to you*. God is every bit real to those who believe in him, they see his influence everywhere, to the true believers it's glaring them in the face, but personal perceptions are not evidence and personal experience is only applicable to yourself.
override367 7 months ago
@override367 Get up to date on modern physics. Quantum Nonlocality, Entanglement, etc. Read any Psychedic guru and he'll tell you there is something else...what that is can differ. So they're all true. The idea of God CAN exist and not exist at the same time. There is no paradox. The only truth is that all is true. Good comment by the way, well written. But I don't think you're getting the point. Look to much smarter people than me to explain these things. READ read read.
Edubbplate 7 months ago
Comment removed
override367 7 months ago
It fits in your butt.
That totally captures what I was thinking when watching Comfort´s banana video.
Except that I first thought of vagina, not the butt.
54321Adela 7 months ago
"Sodomy or Homosexuality" "as long as there's an or in there, Yes!"
drealgrin 7 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
i didn't know about this atheist experience, i consider myself in heaven! LOL XD damn it sucks to live in a third world country ruled by the catholic efffin' church :( ugh!!!!! At least i can see america has its own religious nuts itself :S
freiheitsalv 7 months ago
@freiheitsalv I'm so sorry that Catholic's are you're primary source of any of God's word....
ikky1007 6 months ago
i made a packt with the devil that i could torture all the christians in hell whos goin to expose hatred toward me, oh yea plus he said female angels in hell are hot and sluty, and i get the honor to chat with dawkins.
hellagesoon 7 months ago
@hellagesoon
Slutty hot female angels?
I hope there is no such thing as aids in hell then :D
PhreakStep 7 months ago
you guys seriously need to interview someone with half a brain, these callers are all thick as shit. They all sound slow. This has no credibility.
shootomatic 7 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
@shootomatic I totally agree. They all start sounding the same after 30 mins. Can we get a theologian, a historian, a theistic scientist, a professor, something? There are in actuality a few arguments for god's existence. They aren't good arguments, and are filled with holes, but they ARE there. That's just it, though. Most Catholic defense comes from attacking credibility in atheist opinion, as if Catholic opinion gets to win by default.
spehizle 7 months ago
@shootomatic Well, you've gotta remember this is a once a week-low budget show based in Austin, it's not that easy to get someone with half a brain on the show.
Aviii 7 months ago
@shootomatic Then why don't you call in, smart boy? They talk to whoever picks up the phone and dials the number.
GregJPreece 6 months ago
What the hell did matt say at 2:04?
hanspeterpitsch 7 months ago
@hanspeterpitsch He said 'as long as there's an 'or' in there, yes'. Because the question was asking sodomy or homosexuality. Because there's the 'or' he's saying he's done one but not the other.
Dgen717 7 months ago
@Dgen717 Thanks, now it seems pretty clear actually.
hanspeterpitsch 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"BURN IN HELL FOR ETERNITY" OR "BELIEVE IN JESUS BEFORE TOO LATE"
THE END IS COMING SOON WITH SUDDEN DESTRUCTION ON EARTH.
fuckmania07 7 months ago
Actually, unicorns are mentioned in the bible. Yet another reason it's just a fairy tale book.
MrRoboto81 7 months ago
@MrRoboto81 Ah so you don't believe at one point in time Unicorns could have existed.. i suppose you don't believe in dinosaurs either, Apatosaurs are in the bible...
ikky1007 6 months ago
I love the fact that you guys are soo calm and all these so called christians are soo rudem anything but christ-like.... kepp up the good work guys.... Viva Science and rational thinking!!!!!!!!!!!!
sinohui3 8 months ago
I love you guys!
TheGoldenwolfeye 8 months ago in playlist The Atheist Experience
"it fits in your butt". HHAHAHAAAHAA!!
dfhdjlfh 8 months ago