@itubenowplease How the hell did evolution get into this? And evolution doesn't have a set speed, his theory said only MAJOR upgrades take about a million years, minor such has bigger brain, getting faster, those take a few dozen thousand years. This kind of thing? Are you talking about the extinctions of bees in china? Extinctions don't happen every 12k years, its fully random. Haarp isn't taking the supercooled air down. The mag. grip weakening? Where did you hear it's weakening?
If someone knocked on my door and said they were my Great great great great great great great grandson/daughter I would shut the door, I wouldn't want to risk the universe's collapse caused by a paradox just to meet him/her.
Time travel already happens. When you crawl at 1mph time slows. When you go on a plane at 500mph time slows a little more. To have meaningful time travel, well that would require travelling at close to six hundred and sixty nine million mph.
@hcvang Just because it's an imagination doesn't make it a theory, an imagination can be anything, from pigs that breath out molten lava to dinosaurs eating a galaxy. A Theory is looked into quite a bit, they fix everything to make it seem as possible as possible (lol), but Theories usually end when a single impossibility hit the scene, but until an impossibility is found, it is a theory. If a theory is disproven, it is not imagination, it is a thought.
its like a bluetooth brain they should make a hologramme who can go into the computer and read emails and what ever you say to the hologramme she tells the other person
can someone inform about the "teleportation" mentioned by michio kaku? does this transfer faster than the speed of light, i.e. instantaneously? can it be used to transmit information? what is this process called?
"I've come across some very energetic people than"
LMFAO!!! That guy wins! When Mr. Kaku was talking about the brain using up a lot more energy when it lies, and the other guy (sorry don't know his name) said that. I had to fight to keep from rolling in my cubical laughing!
Yes... yes....professor....things like teleportation might be possible in near future...
But will we be able to live the life till that time?????? Mother Nature is getting worse than ever …..
Its pity that we people have no concerns towards her…...we always wish to make our life happier … we have no concerns about the thing that die to make us happy……
Ok, he was cool at first, but hes been saying almost exactly the same thing for 4 years now. Like almost word for word. I just heard him on Coast to Coast AM the other day, and he was talking about the same thing, with no updates.
I can't see how time travel backwards would be possible unless space records every second of everything and plants it somewhere. Although the prof here did'nt say that.
only a person from a 0 civilization would come up with the idea that there are 3 categories of civilization and put their own civilization at 0. what a darn shame! no wonder we at 0.
Me and a friend found this gallery, and there is certainly some intensely insane looking things found on it. Have a look at it, just go to ufosecretXnet (replace X with . )
Just simply amazing how far we've come. Let's hope we make it all the way to type 3, we've made it to a point where we are our own worst threat, and can make it if we try.
If the teleported you is you and isn't you, who is it?
But, scientists believe strongly that the universe contains ten dimensions, humans only currently knowing of four; length, width, volume and time. How can we make break-throughs without the knowledge of the six unknown dimensions?
When teleportation becomes accessible, will it be possible to teleport all the religion-adepts to Mars (or whatever available planet) so that they can preach to each other and kill each other off (proven theory: crusades for one) and leave the rest of humanity alone to work on science and progress?
So many people complaining about Michio Kaku's repetition in his speeches. Well you try becoming an internationally recognized and celebrated theoretical physicists who travels around the world to summits, conferences and tv shows on a regular basis. Let's see whether you start repeating yourself or not. Heck even the funniest stand up comedians on earth use the same jokes over and over again. And they claim to be 'stand up' comedians, in reality its all pre-prepared. Learn some respect kids.
@lendmeurears the thing about science is that when you have a theorie you want to use the simpelest way to explain it to others. so Dr. Kaku just keeps saying the same stuff so that everybody can understand. Also he cant just invent random shit to change his speech and stuff.
I'm not an expert. But if the light was 'bending' around the cylinder, then wouldn't you notice a slight shimmer outlining the cylinder or object? Like the effect you get when a black hole bends light and gravity around its entrance?
This guy confuses me. I search for his religious views and I get some stuff claiming he's atheist, and here he is talking about souls. I think he's just using the term "soul" to differentiate between your actual self and an identical clone of yourself.
I believe its not a "soul" in religious terms as such he is refering to. But the life time experience. For example memories- how do you transport memories if you just reconstructing someone. And other behavoural entities such as kindness.
this guy has some great openminded idea's , but its to bad that he thinks people have a ''soul''. it really wouldn't matter accually. the act of telephortion, would be breaking down something and rebuilding it on a difrend place. in this case it doesn't really matter as long as every single atom gets back on the right place, meaning your brain, memory and such intact. theoreticly =p
I wonder how you people live you life, no offence, but do you honestly think that the feelings you feel everyday are mere chemical reactions? Does the love that your parents and friends give you are mere inherited instincts written down in molecules? Is there no meaning in life but to reproduce and continue the gene stream? I don't say I object what you say, but take a long look into your life till now and tell me are you a mere fabric wedged between space and time, or something more ALIVE...
bull %^&*. Eating replenishes cells that die. otherwise we would need to eat 98% of our weight in food every day... Things like bones and nerves are NOT replaced ever usually.
In 2003 there was a boy named Link, and his friends at school were bullying him and laughing at him because his name was the same as a game character. Half a year later he was found in the kitchen with a knife. He had slit his throat. If you don't put this on 3 videos in 10 minutes, he will stab you with the knife in your neck while you're asleep.
The analogy with the plane doesn't hold. The plane was basically a technical achievement, whereby time travel is still in the realm of wild speculation.
And BTW my car still run on gasoline. This is 19th century technology. Our technology is basically upgraded 19th century. Time travel, if is possible, is far far faaaaar away in the future.
I really like listening to Dr. Kaku but he reuses phrases over and over. He's used "Harry Potter, watch out!" in about five separate interviews I've seen so far. He is still very interesting to listen to though.
Lol i get what you mean .....But I think he's using laymans term so people can relay to what ever he's talking about....Sciene can become stale and technical....But he's refering to pop culture just to break it down......lol
Time travel may be a class 3 impossibility; the jury is still out on that one. AFAIK most physicists believe that time travel to the past is impossible.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
at4:40 kaku says that light goes through ppl..lol..light doesnot go THROUGH any of us stupid kaku...it REFLECTS off us into the eye..thats why we can see..if it went through us then it wouldn't hit anything...just like if it went around us..and we wouldn't see.anything..get it..stupid kaku
Visible light doesn't pass through us, but that is just a tiny fraction of the entire spectrum. There are however many forms of light that pass through us.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
everything he says is just DAH!!! so we can all have random theories and become scientists...can scientists stop talking bullshit and actually do something..because nothing is impossible...anything we imagine should be possible
he reminds me of proffessor howell.The reporting is too fast,when does one digest the info.Its obvious people will sit around like jaba,hoping they can just pay for a new reality.People dont even know what reality is,or they could control their dreams.
sadly enough we will be a class 0 civilization as long as we have religions that preach that science is evil and keep humanity ignorant with childish superstitious beliefs
@GodKillerAtheist agree but, that is a very narrow minded view, you also have to take into account emotions about such subjects, emotions like the ones you describe but also the emotions that you show, intensity of passion needs to die as well as many other aspects of our civilization. People have to be free thinking(choosing)but all look desire a common goal which is for the good of the civilization. religion holds this back but so does alot of things including "human rights" & individuality
@TIKIHEAD01 "intensity of passion needs to die as well" I don't agree with that. Many people have passions for their work and for their goals. Perhaps you're talking of a lustful sexual passion of a jealous nature?
"religion holds this back but so does alot of things including "human rights" & individuality" well with no human rights and no individuality we really wouldn't be human..
@GodKillerAtheist exactly, we wouldnt be human, we would be like the cells of a single entity (the civilization). as far as passion im thinking more of personal pride, an example would be like for your local sports team, or pride for your race, basically any feelings that will make you despise or resent another person, or put yourself in a better light than another. total equality would be the outcome.
@TIKIHEAD01 "we would be like the cells of a single entity "
I believe in a conservative form of anarchy. Each individual intelligent enough to self governing respectfully towards one another.No laws No consequences because each would be working to improve Society and quality of life.
"im thinking more of personal pride, an example would be like / pride for your race" Pride can be a good trait but proud for something you didn't accomplish like selecting your genotype is moronic.
Thats great! :), do you have any particular philosopher or/and phycisist that influenced you?
In philosophy my masters are Schopenhauer, B. Russell, J. S. Mill and obviously Plato
In physics, well im not sure since physics used to be a branch of philosophy (natural philosophy) but I suppose is evident that Newton and einstein are impressive!
I don't like the fact that emotions and brain activity can be monitored. I mean I am not one to be paranoid but imagine what terrorist groups or any other organization can do with this technology? With every good thing comes the bad as well it seems.
model/theory of what as been observed and not the thing itself. Unless a model is 100% accurate at all locations (time & space) and therefor becomes the universe itself, you can never know if the model has flaws or will need modifying or even replacing completely
there is probably trillions of people who have touched this earth..(generations of families, people dying, etc.)if we could actually ever have time travel, we would be visited by the future. and since not one person that has been on this earth has had proof or anything, about seeing or showing someone or something from the future, i highly doubt this could exist.
You can't state possible or impossible based upon SCIENCE. Science deals with probabilities, theories, models, do not confuse these with facts, which are only available in CURRENT EMPIRICAL EXPERIENCE. Memories will not do. Also as soon as you label an observation, you have started modeling.
One thing I'd like to make clear is that this idea of "class I, II, III" civilizations was originally the idea of Issac Asimov in his "Guide to Science" series of books. It's quite an older idea than probably most people of this generation realize.
i wish i could meet michio in person hes my idol...i might not have the academics to be a physicist but i have the imagination, intelect, and brightness it takes....he motivates everytime i hear him...everything he talks about is ABSOLUTLY MIND BOGGLING!!
Anyone who claims "impossible" when practicing scientific method is talking out of their ARSEHOLE! Scientific method does not and can not rule out future events as impossible. LEARN SOME SCIENCE!!!!! Science can show a hypothesis to be incorrect/inaccurate ONLY on events as they happen. SCIENCE BASICS!!!! this is why we deal in SCIENTIFIC THEORIES and not SCIENTIFIC FACTS!!! - go back to school.
When you state that "nothing can be declared impossible" you are making the mistake of an approach called "empiricism-positivism". Indeed, if *nothing* can be declared true or untrue with certainty, what will you say to the man who declares "I exist"? It is fallacious and self-contradictory to reject axiomatic statements.
No mistake made. Call it what you like. I never claimed *nothing* can be declared true or untrue. (You are mistaking your idea of "empiricism-positivism" for what I have claimed). I claim as true my CURRENT SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCE and all else is part of my probability model. Do not confuse axioms for the phenomena they try to describe. This tends to happen when people elevate (forget) their probability model to a FACT.
I understand what you're saying. My main point was that some theories/ideas can simply be rejected outright (stated as impossible). I like what you said with regard to present vs. future events.
Claims/theories can be rejected outright on the basis of internal consistency. The claim that "in the future a person will time travel" is fallacious for a variety of reasons, whatever you call the criteria; philosophy, logic, the scientific method etc.
There is no theory that can rule out time travel. The reason for this is theories can not rule out anything. They can be used to estimate a very very low probability of an event occurring. Even some of the interpretations of quantum mechanics allow for time travel, for instance the many worlds interpretation (which follows the math) which has not been falsified and is used as a guide in quantum computation experiments. The theories of relativity do not strictly suggest time travel is impossible.
The idea that "nothing can be proven impossible" is entirely incorrect. This is an idea that stems from the fallacious method of "empiricism positivism". Google it.
I did not say you could not come to conclusions from observation. All I am saying is those conclusions are a model/theory of what as been observed and not the thing itself. Unless a model is 100% accurate at all locations (time & space) and therefor becomes the universe itself, you can never know if the model has flaws or will need modifying or even replacing completely. That is what we have to live with for models/theories, they can NEVER be claimed to be truth, facts or knowledge.
Remember Scientific Theories (and that includes so called laws) are bayesian probability networks and bayesian probability networks rely on estimated probabilities of greater than 0% and less than 100%. I'm afraid impossibility is not a claim that can be made from science and let's not here any more about empiricism positivism. Learn which tools to apply to which arguments! Nothing in science is ever proven, It can not, as science is a collection of models that we trust as useful, NOT FACTS.
Time is the measurment taken when the object in motion is moving throuhg space relatively to another. Time is a subjective value of an objects possiton on trajectory displacement.
Didnt you go to elementary school?
Also an encyclopedic definition:
Time is a component of a measuring system used to sequence events, to compare the durations of events and the intervals between them, and to quantify the motions of objec
Dude if you dont have the capacity to understand what I said you better get your brain checked. I didnt say anything difficult. All I said is that time is a name of meausrment of motion. The same goes for distance, for the freaking whole physics. Also volts, also liters, also amplitude, also seconds and all other measurments. Measurment is measurment. Go and study the basics of phsics. You dont even know the difference between time and movement. How do you expect to understand this vid?
You insult my knowledge, yet you made a statement that, by your own definition, is nonsensical. Simply state a definition of time that makes the phrase "time travel" nonsensical. Simple.
Time is a measurement of successive locations, of which second is a chosen unit. Just like volt is a unit measure of potential, liter a unit measure of extent in three mutually orthogonal directions, and amplitude a measure of the magnitude of oscillation. Shall we volume, potential, or amplitude travel also?
Yes you cant travel the electricity, because thats a syntax error. I get it! But we are not talking about grammar, but about the physical world and measuring events in it. Relativity says that if you go about close to the speed of light you will see the world around you in a fastforward motion. Why do you argue about this obvious thing. We have tome, because our brain is able to process events in such way.
This is not an issue of grammar, but an issue of getting to the root of what time IS. You cite relativity as saying that you will SEE the world around you move differently at high speed. Is a difference in perception equal to reality? Is causality violated simply because an object moves fast? Or because causality *appears* to be violated? Which explanation for this observation is simpler, that our perception is wrong or that the universe is non-causal?
Let's consider relativity carefully. It places an observer at the center of inquiry, it is inherently a theory of observation and measurement. The mechanism of observation is the photon. It is absolutely true that, if an object moves at c, we will no longer observe it. This is perfectly logical, if what we are detecting is moving faster than what we are USING to detect, it is obviously undetectable. Does that mean it actually disappeared or shot off into an alternate dimension or "the future"?
if it is undetectible I cant tell you anything about it. But yes if it does move cloes to the speed of light the time of its own is different than the time of the objects not moving. That is the theory. It has been observed. It was observed for instance on space stations that rotate around the earth at incredible speeds. When they compared the atomic clocks in space and on our planet they realised there is split second missing on the space station.
In analyzing these experiments it is important to remember that time is only measured with reference to a standard, and this standard is *assumed* immutable. For instance, at one time it was assumed the earth circled the sun in a perfectly regular fashion, so all time was measured in fractions of earth rotations (from years to months to days, hours, minutes, and seconds). The standard was discarded because it was found that the earth does not return to the exact same location every "year".
Now they use an atomic clock, another *assumed* perfect standard. If the clocks appear to disagree then this is, first and foremost, an issue of the internal machinations of the atomic clock. Just as before discrepancies were an issue of the rotation of the earth. Nuclear decay is not perfectly understood by any means. The correct scientific question to resolve is, why does an atom decay differently at high velocity?
Search the Einstains 3main equations. The time dilation. Contraction of lenght. Relative change of mass. But for the record your not the only and first person to question the validity of atomic decay. The answer is high velocity makes the sub-atomic particles move at greater distance(greater velocity, greater distance covered in shorter time). The particles arrive in "later time" making the time dilatation, thus proving the theory of relativity.
By the way, I have read all of Einstein's original work in addition to other scientists too numerous to name. I know the equations by heart, I am a trained physicist getting a Ph.D in chemical physics. I have arrived at my conclusions through research and subsequent thought and analysis. If one studies relativity objectively there can simply be no other conclusion than that it is a theory of *measurement* and *observation*.
This is so not cool! You know I had many people say the same thing you say now_:D
"I am a high school student and I know everything!" You can go and whipe your ass with that diploma. Maybe your employer thinks its cool, but not me. And if you really did read his work WTF is still your problem? Do you even know why he concluded what he concluded? I know Descartes said that doubt is the sign of thinking, but you are still tampering in the realm of wordplay, I am sorry to confirm.
Too many people discredit anyone who disagrees with mainstream claims if they have no credentials. I just don't want you to dismiss me out of hand, assuming I do not have the background, have not done the research, or simpl do not know what I'm talking about.
This is not wordplay. Time dilation cannot be interpreted as anything except a change in measurement. Time itself is a human measurement. You are unable to refute any of my statements.
Talk of "time travel" is a matter of reification of mathematical concepts. Measurement!=Reality. If I am counting photons from an object to measure time and I count 0 photons it is NOT because time stopped for the object, it is because my measurement is flawed. The measurement itself is not time, it is a human invention and inherently subjective. You may be interested to read about "empiricism-positivism".
loook dude! I dont know what your trying to prove. It has worked for other 100 000 scientists, it should work for you. The theory of relativity is almost 100 years old so if someone had a problem with the stuff it would eventually come up.
Plenty of people have problems with it, actually. Not with the quantitative results, obviously, but with the conceptual core and the physical interpretation. Google "A Rational Cosmology".
This has been flagged as spam show
di naman native english speaker si Kaku .. ang galing na nga nya magenglish kumpara sa ibang japanese
The1211deep 1 month ago
hes full of shit not a physisyts asshole
TKBOMBER666 3 months ago
space elevators like the gundam shit
langkaers09 5 months ago
Anyone else find it ironic that there is a kung fu panda behing the good japanese doctor? :)
spiritronin 8 months ago
@itubenowplease what about 40mpy?
Deliphin11 10 months ago
@itubenowplease How the hell did evolution get into this? And evolution doesn't have a set speed, his theory said only MAJOR upgrades take about a million years, minor such has bigger brain, getting faster, those take a few dozen thousand years. This kind of thing? Are you talking about the extinctions of bees in china? Extinctions don't happen every 12k years, its fully random. Haarp isn't taking the supercooled air down. The mag. grip weakening? Where did you hear it's weakening?
Deliphin11 10 months ago
@itubenowplease Only Canada and US has bees becoming rare and China is the only known place where they're extinct.
Deliphin11 10 months ago
If someone knocked on my door and said they were my Great great great great great great great grandson/daughter I would shut the door, I wouldn't want to risk the universe's collapse caused by a paradox just to meet him/her.
Deliphin11 10 months ago
damn jimmy page is smart!
earlgreyification 10 months ago
Dr. Michio Kaku is one of the most brilliant people alive at this time . on the planet IMHO.
wildvidz 10 months ago
I really enjoyed the video, thanks for sharing
Jasy1988able 10 months ago
Time travel already happens. When you crawl at 1mph time slows. When you go on a plane at 500mph time slows a little more. To have meaningful time travel, well that would require travelling at close to six hundred and sixty nine million mph.
valarmanwe 11 months ago
@itubenowplease dude i see bumble bees like every day in aus
bertos09 11 months ago
but then again every single thing we create starts in the mind as an idea
naemasufi 1 year ago
time to cash in on that tv-show of his, apparently(!)
hcvang 1 year ago
awesome, already stuff I saw as a kid on sci-fi films is now possible
naemasufi 1 year ago
@naemasufi err... theories do not mean possibilities. you can imagine anything, but without the means to maked it reality - it's not possible.
hcvang 1 year ago
@hcvang Just because it's an imagination doesn't make it a theory, an imagination can be anything, from pigs that breath out molten lava to dinosaurs eating a galaxy. A Theory is looked into quite a bit, they fix everything to make it seem as possible as possible (lol), but Theories usually end when a single impossibility hit the scene, but until an impossibility is found, it is a theory. If a theory is disproven, it is not imagination, it is a thought.
Deliphin11 10 months ago
@Deliphin11 thats what i just said...
hcvang 10 months ago
its like a bluetooth brain they should make a hologramme who can go into the computer and read emails and what ever you say to the hologramme she tells the other person
doggypower1 1 year ago
can someone inform about the "teleportation" mentioned by michio kaku? does this transfer faster than the speed of light, i.e. instantaneously? can it be used to transmit information? what is this process called?
egokick 1 year ago
"I've come across some very energetic people than"
LMFAO!!! That guy wins! When Mr. Kaku was talking about the brain using up a lot more energy when it lies, and the other guy (sorry don't know his name) said that. I had to fight to keep from rolling in my cubical laughing!
KingLantto 1 year ago
If only men like Michio Kaku will be the rulers of an United Earth
GrayShark09 1 year ago 2
@GrayShark09 only broken men desire to be ruled.
egokick 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'd like to see as starship built. XD
darktreason 1 year ago
I'd like to see as tarship built. XD
darktreason 1 year ago
Yes... yes....professor....things like teleportation might be possible in near future...
But will we be able to live the life till that time?????? Mother Nature is getting worse than ever …..
Its pity that we people have no concerns towards her…...we always wish to make our life happier … we have no concerns about the thing that die to make us happy……
A physics student…..
sreerajt90 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The big bad Oil corporations r trying their best to stop free energy technology from spreading to common ppl.
We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating ur own electricity now.
Visit LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints . Join the Revolution!!
checksummedchest 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and it's here but the coverup is strong, if u r interested in a REAL free energy magnet motor
just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it's probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
ivylsp 1 year ago
Ok, he was cool at first, but hes been saying almost exactly the same thing for 4 years now. Like almost word for word. I just heard him on Coast to Coast AM the other day, and he was talking about the same thing, with no updates.
MrKevMan 1 year ago
I can't see how time travel backwards would be possible unless space records every second of everything and plants it somewhere. Although the prof here did'nt say that.
kezadrone 1 year ago
only a person from a 0 civilization would come up with the idea that there are 3 categories of civilization and put their own civilization at 0. what a darn shame! no wonder we at 0.
caribbeangirl100 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@caribbeangirl100 Is it that difficult to believe that we are not as advanced as we may think?
wtfbbqhacks 1 year ago
michael kaku seems crazy nice. totally random but just saying. i've never seen him mad even in a debate
Jackleandcheese 1 year ago
hmm....
GoReRoTTedDeAtH 1 year ago
He's a theorist... -.-
Sussedsubber 1 year ago
Me and a friend found this gallery, and there is certainly some intensely insane looking things found on it. Have a look at it, just go to ufosecretXnet (replace X with . )
rommel1975100 1 year ago
somesome should knock on his door asking for money because hes his great grandson from the future
TheSeeker18161 1 year ago
that music at the begining was like bieng in africa
ghazalhora 1 year ago
Just simply amazing how far we've come. Let's hope we make it all the way to type 3, we've made it to a point where we are our own worst threat, and can make it if we try.
If the teleported you is you and isn't you, who is it?
abdishtar 1 year ago
What has this got to do with how to make Cottage Pie?
RossHardmanHarvey123 1 year ago
@RossHardmanHarvey123 I like pie
DeeDub02 1 year ago
@DeeDub02 No you don't, cunt.
RossHardmanHarvey123 1 year ago
people who say things can't be possible are the same people who use 2 say the earth was flat
Herdstudio 1 year ago
perhaps people have traveled back to our time from the future but while being invisible. perhaps this explains ghost sightings.
lhatebobsaget1989 1 year ago
But, scientists believe strongly that the universe contains ten dimensions, humans only currently knowing of four; length, width, volume and time. How can we make break-throughs without the knowledge of the six unknown dimensions?
musicmaniacguy 2 years ago
When teleportation becomes accessible, will it be possible to teleport all the religion-adepts to Mars (or whatever available planet) so that they can preach to each other and kill each other off (proven theory: crusades for one) and leave the rest of humanity alone to work on science and progress?
ngocnudang 2 years ago 9
that would be an interesting experiment. but i doubt there will be change.
rionn214 1 year ago
@ngocnudang Good idea ;)
Lakopa8 1 year ago
*You know vertical?
robotsky8 2 years ago
So many people complaining about Michio Kaku's repetition in his speeches. Well you try becoming an internationally recognized and celebrated theoretical physicists who travels around the world to summits, conferences and tv shows on a regular basis. Let's see whether you start repeating yourself or not. Heck even the funniest stand up comedians on earth use the same jokes over and over again. And they claim to be 'stand up' comedians, in reality its all pre-prepared. Learn some respect kids.
lendmeurears 2 years ago 20
You know how vertical leap? How would you jump higher and windmill from 10 ft? Practice? Don't train kid! Vertical leap ain't genetics though.
robotsky8 2 years ago
@lendmeurears the thing about science is that when you have a theorie you want to use the simpelest way to explain it to others. so Dr. Kaku just keeps saying the same stuff so that everybody can understand. Also he cant just invent random shit to change his speech and stuff.
ilovemilou94 9 months ago
Oww, i just got a brain cramp.
Ronsidat 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
he keeps repeating same words with same expression and tone in every video.
impulsive2urge 2 years ago
well feroz0307, i believe you feel so strongly about that because your brain is so advanced. hahahaha
MrAweeze 2 years ago
the closer we get to time travel the closer we get to interact with aliens. We will interact with other civilisations before we master time travel.
TuBig4Life 2 years ago
I'm not an expert. But if the light was 'bending' around the cylinder, then wouldn't you notice a slight shimmer outlining the cylinder or object? Like the effect you get when a black hole bends light and gravity around its entrance?
K24Productions 2 years ago
i have listen to many of his speech and they are pretty much the same.
Rayner1234 2 years ago
This guy confuses me. I search for his religious views and I get some stuff claiming he's atheist, and here he is talking about souls. I think he's just using the term "soul" to differentiate between your actual self and an identical clone of yourself.
killsourenemy 2 years ago
I believe its not a "soul" in religious terms as such he is refering to. But the life time experience. For example memories- how do you transport memories if you just reconstructing someone. And other behavoural entities such as kindness.
shagster1970 2 years ago 2
this guy has some great openminded idea's , but its to bad that he thinks people have a ''soul''. it really wouldn't matter accually. the act of telephortion, would be breaking down something and rebuilding it on a difrend place. in this case it doesn't really matter as long as every single atom gets back on the right place, meaning your brain, memory and such intact. theoreticly =p
sagemaster 2 years ago
I wonder how you people live you life, no offence, but do you honestly think that the feelings you feel everyday are mere chemical reactions? Does the love that your parents and friends give you are mere inherited instincts written down in molecules? Is there no meaning in life but to reproduce and continue the gene stream? I don't say I object what you say, but take a long look into your life till now and tell me are you a mere fabric wedged between space and time, or something more ALIVE...
feroz0307 2 years ago
Educate yourself plz....
pippodeltrappeto 2 years ago
but if you get a chip in your brain to use the internet wouldnt you also get viruses
fernandoblackstar 2 years ago 2
they woud of make super antiviruses so no virus can damage us,
bluedrink00 2 years ago
i have herpes...
helltrackrider 2 years ago
lol the chip in his brain wasent conected to the internet it was only conected to the mouse cursor ;)
Erik3E 2 years ago
time travel is better left undiscovered. humankind would just fuck everything up as is their nature.
gamehazard101 2 years ago
Sins of a Solar Empire!!
redcommand85 2 years ago
where can i get his book? could it be at borders?
deaddevils1 2 years ago
98% of all the atoms in ur body are replaced daily
backspace8908 2 years ago
thats gotta be a lie, why does it take more than 1 day to decompose?
SharkyRoll 2 years ago
they are replaced with new ones by the food we eat and air we breath
its not the fact that they are "broken" its just they are removed to make room for new ones
it takes more to decompose b/c the atoms are stuck in the cells when we die
and are not let out until they are eaten by other creatures
backspace8908 2 years ago
ah i see
SharkyRoll 2 years ago
bull %^&*. Eating replenishes cells that die. otherwise we would need to eat 98% of our weight in food every day... Things like bones and nerves are NOT replaced ever usually.
Ranoake 2 years ago
most of ur body is water
which is made of h20
u breath oxygen
and u get hydrogen from light
backspace8908 2 years ago
Haha, and is that suppose to prove you replace 98% of the atoms in your body daily? Keep trying.
Ranoake 2 years ago
Well its good to know its somewwhere makin music......
shaz2oo6 2 years ago
wow, finally an interview of Dr. Michio Kaku where the host asks mostly interesting or smart questions :D
FelipeChoque 2 years ago 5
Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator is the sequel to Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
The Space Elevator idea reminds me of Wonka's Elevator.... Wikipedia tells the plot of the story.
TerrahDawn 2 years ago
YEAH WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR SOUL ?
shaz2oo6 2 years ago
This guy comes off sounding about 1/4 bullshit at times, it's pretty interesting though.
rudenoodle 2 years ago
Looks like he's coming direct from the set of The Fifth Element.
RebelVoDKa 2 years ago 5
Haha
rudenoodle 2 years ago
ooh i love this stuff. so exciting
justme252009 2 years ago
I was really surprised when he said "telepathy". Aliens are said to use telepathy according to eye witnesses. I believe its possible anyway.
JargonDragon 2 years ago
Nothing but respect for Michio.
GoogleThoughtPolice 2 years ago 36
This has been flagged as spam show
In 2003 there was a boy named Link, and his friends at school were bullying him and laughing at him because his name was the same as a game character. Half a year later he was found in the kitchen with a knife. He had slit his throat. If you don't put this on 3 videos in 10 minutes, he will stab you with the knife in your neck while you're asleep.
filli2 2 years ago
The analogy with the plane doesn't hold. The plane was basically a technical achievement, whereby time travel is still in the realm of wild speculation.
And BTW my car still run on gasoline. This is 19th century technology. Our technology is basically upgraded 19th century. Time travel, if is possible, is far far faaaaar away in the future.
cgmp84 2 years ago
9:15 that's a question I've always wondered about teleportation myself.
Also does anyone know the name of the man he mentioned that was able to operate a computer with his mind? I'd really like to read more about that.
RaynorX 2 years ago
I really like listening to Dr. Kaku but he reuses phrases over and over. He's used "Harry Potter, watch out!" in about five separate interviews I've seen so far. He is still very interesting to listen to though.
Robbie2188 2 years ago
Lol i get what you mean .....But I think he's using laymans term so people can relay to what ever he's talking about....Sciene can become stale and technical....But he's refering to pop culture just to break it down......lol
66kompis 2 years ago
Time travel may be a class 3 impossibility; the jury is still out on that one. AFAIK most physicists believe that time travel to the past is impossible.
Blacksun1942 2 years ago
why is it that when they talk about imposobilities in physics they always mention movies
bigvic22sti 2 years ago
just something to relate to i guess...
ah4fecksake 2 years ago 3
have you allready seen the mind controled toy? teleport was done but with a proton or light photon i believe...
doldei 2 years ago
science fiction often become's science fact !
howgar7 2 years ago 8
Our civilization is a BIG ZERO. Time to become #1 ASAP. Dr. Kaku is awesome.
CoolDojo9000 2 years ago 17
Yes, we're type ZIP, ZERO, NADA lol
Zigahertz 2 years ago
I totally agree. I wish the rest of the world would realize this. I hope to contribute to the process though :)
AlderDragon 2 years ago
With time everything is possible.
Zaphkielonoma 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
at4:40 kaku says that light goes through ppl..lol..light doesnot go THROUGH any of us stupid kaku...it REFLECTS off us into the eye..thats why we can see..if it went through us then it wouldn't hit anything...just like if it went around us..and we wouldn't see.anything..get it..stupid kaku
t0rta 2 years ago
You're a fool.
Visible light doesn't pass through us, but that is just a tiny fraction of the entire spectrum. There are however many forms of light that pass through us.
atheistnarnia 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
everything he says is just DAH!!! so we can all have random theories and become scientists...can scientists stop talking bullshit and actually do something..because nothing is impossible...anything we imagine should be possible
t0rta 2 years ago
Wtf Michio... soul?
H4X !!!
pran1zzle 3 years ago
he reminds me of proffessor howell.The reporting is too fast,when does one digest the info.Its obvious people will sit around like jaba,hoping they can just pay for a new reality.People dont even know what reality is,or they could control their dreams.
creten69 3 years ago
sadly enough we will be a class 0 civilization as long as we have religions that preach that science is evil and keep humanity ignorant with childish superstitious beliefs
GodKillerAtheist 3 years ago 46
This comment has received too many negative votes show
don't worry science don't care about religion...
^^ , all labs works with this in mind "We the gods,we are the makers"
Cruz182 3 years ago
"science don't care about religion"
why would it? religion is silly
GodKillerAtheist 3 years ago
hahaha your a moron. How can you not see your own mistake.
moidixmois1 3 years ago
"How can you not see your own mistake. "
I can totally see YOUR mistake
GodKillerAtheist 3 years ago
of course.
moidixmois1 3 years ago
couldn't have put it better!!
tetiraelian 3 years ago
@GodKillerAtheist couldnt agree more
AsakuraAvan 1 year ago
@GodKillerAtheist well said, religion was only Invented! to keep public order.
SuperBigMan27 1 year ago
@GodKillerAtheist I love you.
RIOT690 1 year ago
@GodKillerAtheist agree but, that is a very narrow minded view, you also have to take into account emotions about such subjects, emotions like the ones you describe but also the emotions that you show, intensity of passion needs to die as well as many other aspects of our civilization. People have to be free thinking(choosing)but all look desire a common goal which is for the good of the civilization. religion holds this back but so does alot of things including "human rights" & individuality
TIKIHEAD01 1 year ago
@TIKIHEAD01 "intensity of passion needs to die as well" I don't agree with that. Many people have passions for their work and for their goals. Perhaps you're talking of a lustful sexual passion of a jealous nature?
"religion holds this back but so does alot of things including "human rights" & individuality" well with no human rights and no individuality we really wouldn't be human..
GodKillerAtheist 1 year ago
@GodKillerAtheist exactly, we wouldnt be human, we would be like the cells of a single entity (the civilization). as far as passion im thinking more of personal pride, an example would be like for your local sports team, or pride for your race, basically any feelings that will make you despise or resent another person, or put yourself in a better light than another. total equality would be the outcome.
TIKIHEAD01 1 year ago
@TIKIHEAD01 "we would be like the cells of a single entity "
I believe in a conservative form of anarchy. Each individual intelligent enough to self governing respectfully towards one another.No laws No consequences because each would be working to improve Society and quality of life.
"im thinking more of personal pride, an example would be like / pride for your race" Pride can be a good trait but proud for something you didn't accomplish like selecting your genotype is moronic.
GodKillerAtheist 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
We cant go to the sun never ever that is a fact no level so ha ha nerds
BABABOOBZ 3 years ago
Who said about going to the sun? He said harness "the power" of the Sun. Yes I might be a nerd but I'm not a retard.
Airbender19 3 years ago 16
"We cant go to the sun never ever that is a fact"
No that is a hypothesis not a fact.
GodKillerAtheist 3 years ago
agreed!
things we take for granted now seemed impossible to people really far back
thus things that people can easily do in the future would seem impossible to us!
zomgscissors 3 years ago
No, what he meant was that we can never go to the... if we want to live. lol
Zigahertz 2 years ago
Physics + Philosophy + History = My life
comicfan88 3 years ago 3
take the history out and thats my life ;]
anurangax27 3 years ago
Thats great! :), do you have any particular philosopher or/and phycisist that influenced you?
In philosophy my masters are Schopenhauer, B. Russell, J. S. Mill and obviously Plato
In physics, well im not sure since physics used to be a branch of philosophy (natural philosophy) but I suppose is evident that Newton and einstein are impressive!
Have a good day;)
comicfan88 3 years ago 3
that guy is freakin awesome......
modern day einstien
outlawkelb 3 years ago 29
I don't like the fact that emotions and brain activity can be monitored. I mean I am not one to be paranoid but imagine what terrorist groups or any other organization can do with this technology? With every good thing comes the bad as well it seems.
foreverago02 3 years ago
model/theory of what as been observed and not the thing itself. Unless a model is 100% accurate at all locations (time & space) and therefor becomes the universe itself, you can never know if the model has flaws or will need modifying or even replacing completely
kewlkill20 3 years ago
Thanks for posting this up.
steven1990v 3 years ago 4
fuck you and your types////did you drink any stalynskaia before the show....
widwarlock 3 years ago
i read that time travel into the past is impossible, but time travel into the future is possible...
DarqueSock 3 years ago
there is probably trillions of people who have touched this earth..(generations of families, people dying, etc.)if we could actually ever have time travel, we would be visited by the future. and since not one person that has been on this earth has had proof or anything, about seeing or showing someone or something from the future, i highly doubt this could exist.
bbenson94 3 years ago
Models are not facts, only theories.
you can find out more at probabilitymodeling
markgilbert1 3 years ago
You can't state possible or impossible based upon SCIENCE. Science deals with probabilities, theories, models, do not confuse these with facts, which are only available in CURRENT EMPIRICAL EXPERIENCE. Memories will not do. Also as soon as you label an observation, you have started modeling.
markgilbert1 3 years ago
One thing I'd like to make clear is that this idea of "class I, II, III" civilizations was originally the idea of Issac Asimov in his "Guide to Science" series of books. It's quite an older idea than probably most people of this generation realize.
altonhare 3 years ago
i wish i could meet michio in person hes my idol...i might not have the academics to be a physicist but i have the imagination, intelect, and brightness it takes....he motivates everytime i hear him...everything he talks about is ABSOLUTLY MIND BOGGLING!!
headbanger940 3 years ago
I like this...cooperation, animated discussion. Good job, people.
Fryitonapanandstuff 3 years ago
did a search for michio kaku and planet X and all that 2012 stuff, thank god there's none..
InvisiblePinkUnic0rn 3 years ago
he says the exact same lines like the harry potter thing in all of his interviews.
yutziy 3 years ago
I love the guy, but i hate the fact that he used the word "soul", how he said where does our soul go? there is no soul.
Omid45 3 years ago
Anyone who claims "impossible" when practicing scientific method is talking out of their ARSEHOLE! Scientific method does not and can not rule out future events as impossible. LEARN SOME SCIENCE!!!!! Science can show a hypothesis to be incorrect/inaccurate ONLY on events as they happen. SCIENCE BASICS!!!! this is why we deal in SCIENTIFIC THEORIES and not SCIENTIFIC FACTS!!! - go back to school.
markgilbert1 3 years ago
Watch the vid and you will have the answer.
mjufpn 3 years ago
When you state that "nothing can be declared impossible" you are making the mistake of an approach called "empiricism-positivism". Indeed, if *nothing* can be declared true or untrue with certainty, what will you say to the man who declares "I exist"? It is fallacious and self-contradictory to reject axiomatic statements.
altonhare 3 years ago
No mistake made. Call it what you like. I never claimed *nothing* can be declared true or untrue. (You are mistaking your idea of "empiricism-positivism" for what I have claimed). I claim as true my CURRENT SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCE and all else is part of my probability model. Do not confuse axioms for the phenomena they try to describe. This tends to happen when people elevate (forget) their probability model to a FACT.
markgilbert1 3 years ago
I understand what you're saying. My main point was that some theories/ideas can simply be rejected outright (stated as impossible). I like what you said with regard to present vs. future events.
Claims/theories can be rejected outright on the basis of internal consistency. The claim that "in the future a person will time travel" is fallacious for a variety of reasons, whatever you call the criteria; philosophy, logic, the scientific method etc.
altonhare 3 years ago
There is no theory that can rule out time travel. The reason for this is theories can not rule out anything. They can be used to estimate a very very low probability of an event occurring. Even some of the interpretations of quantum mechanics allow for time travel, for instance the many worlds interpretation (which follows the math) which has not been falsified and is used as a guide in quantum computation experiments. The theories of relativity do not strictly suggest time travel is impossible.
markgilbert1 3 years ago
The idea that "nothing can be proven impossible" is entirely incorrect. This is an idea that stems from the fallacious method of "empiricism positivism". Google it.
altonhare 3 years ago
I did not say you could not come to conclusions from observation. All I am saying is those conclusions are a model/theory of what as been observed and not the thing itself. Unless a model is 100% accurate at all locations (time & space) and therefor becomes the universe itself, you can never know if the model has flaws or will need modifying or even replacing completely. That is what we have to live with for models/theories, they can NEVER be claimed to be truth, facts or knowledge.
markgilbert1 3 years ago
All I'm saying is that a theory/idea can be rejected outright without a single observation.
altonhare 3 years ago
Remember Scientific Theories (and that includes so called laws) are bayesian probability networks and bayesian probability networks rely on estimated probabilities of greater than 0% and less than 100%. I'm afraid impossibility is not a claim that can be made from science and let's not here any more about empiricism positivism. Learn which tools to apply to which arguments! Nothing in science is ever proven, It can not, as science is a collection of models that we trust as useful, NOT FACTS.
markgilbert1 3 years ago
In my experience, clear thinking is largely democratically unpopular.
markgilbert1 3 years ago
For anyone who still believes time travel is possible, check the link in my profile.
altonhare 3 years ago
Yes its possible.
mjufpn 3 years ago
Before you can state "X is possible" you have to say exactly what "X" is.
So, what is time?
altonhare 3 years ago
Time is the measurment taken when the object in motion is moving throuhg space relatively to another. Time is a subjective value of an objects possiton on trajectory displacement.
Didnt you go to elementary school?
Also an encyclopedic definition:
Time is a component of a measuring system used to sequence events, to compare the durations of events and the intervals between them, and to quantify the motions of objec
mjufpn 3 years ago
"Time is the measurement..."
So time travel is translated as:
"Movement through a measurement"
Does that make any sense?
altonhare 3 years ago
Dude if you dont have the capacity to understand what I said you better get your brain checked. I didnt say anything difficult. All I said is that time is a name of meausrment of motion. The same goes for distance, for the freaking whole physics. Also volts, also liters, also amplitude, also seconds and all other measurments. Measurment is measurment. Go and study the basics of phsics. You dont even know the difference between time and movement. How do you expect to understand this vid?
mjufpn 3 years ago
You insult my knowledge, yet you made a statement that, by your own definition, is nonsensical. Simply state a definition of time that makes the phrase "time travel" nonsensical. Simple.
Time is a measurement of successive locations, of which second is a chosen unit. Just like volt is a unit measure of potential, liter a unit measure of extent in three mutually orthogonal directions, and amplitude a measure of the magnitude of oscillation. Shall we volume, potential, or amplitude travel also?
altonhare 3 years ago
I was talking about measurments in general OK?
Yes you cant travel the electricity, because thats a syntax error. I get it! But we are not talking about grammar, but about the physical world and measuring events in it. Relativity says that if you go about close to the speed of light you will see the world around you in a fastforward motion. Why do you argue about this obvious thing. We have tome, because our brain is able to process events in such way.
mjufpn 3 years ago
This is not an issue of grammar, but an issue of getting to the root of what time IS. You cite relativity as saying that you will SEE the world around you move differently at high speed. Is a difference in perception equal to reality? Is causality violated simply because an object moves fast? Or because causality *appears* to be violated? Which explanation for this observation is simpler, that our perception is wrong or that the universe is non-causal?
altonhare 3 years ago
Let's consider relativity carefully. It places an observer at the center of inquiry, it is inherently a theory of observation and measurement. The mechanism of observation is the photon. It is absolutely true that, if an object moves at c, we will no longer observe it. This is perfectly logical, if what we are detecting is moving faster than what we are USING to detect, it is obviously undetectable. Does that mean it actually disappeared or shot off into an alternate dimension or "the future"?
altonhare 3 years ago
if it is undetectible I cant tell you anything about it. But yes if it does move cloes to the speed of light the time of its own is different than the time of the objects not moving. That is the theory. It has been observed. It was observed for instance on space stations that rotate around the earth at incredible speeds. When they compared the atomic clocks in space and on our planet they realised there is split second missing on the space station.
mjufpn 3 years ago
In analyzing these experiments it is important to remember that time is only measured with reference to a standard, and this standard is *assumed* immutable. For instance, at one time it was assumed the earth circled the sun in a perfectly regular fashion, so all time was measured in fractions of earth rotations (from years to months to days, hours, minutes, and seconds). The standard was discarded because it was found that the earth does not return to the exact same location every "year".
altonhare 3 years ago
Now they use an atomic clock, another *assumed* perfect standard. If the clocks appear to disagree then this is, first and foremost, an issue of the internal machinations of the atomic clock. Just as before discrepancies were an issue of the rotation of the earth. Nuclear decay is not perfectly understood by any means. The correct scientific question to resolve is, why does an atom decay differently at high velocity?
altonhare 3 years ago
Search the Einstains 3main equations. The time dilation. Contraction of lenght. Relative change of mass. But for the record your not the only and first person to question the validity of atomic decay. The answer is high velocity makes the sub-atomic particles move at greater distance(greater velocity, greater distance covered in shorter time). The particles arrive in "later time" making the time dilatation, thus proving the theory of relativity.
mjufpn 3 years ago
So, then, time dilation is purely an artifact of measurement. Thank you, I think "time travel" can be put to rest then.
altonhare 3 years ago
By the way, I have read all of Einstein's original work in addition to other scientists too numerous to name. I know the equations by heart, I am a trained physicist getting a Ph.D in chemical physics. I have arrived at my conclusions through research and subsequent thought and analysis. If one studies relativity objectively there can simply be no other conclusion than that it is a theory of *measurement* and *observation*.
altonhare 3 years ago
This is so not cool! You know I had many people say the same thing you say now_:D
"I am a high school student and I know everything!" You can go and whipe your ass with that diploma. Maybe your employer thinks its cool, but not me. And if you really did read his work WTF is still your problem? Do you even know why he concluded what he concluded? I know Descartes said that doubt is the sign of thinking, but you are still tampering in the realm of wordplay, I am sorry to confirm.
mjufpn 3 years ago
Too many people discredit anyone who disagrees with mainstream claims if they have no credentials. I just don't want you to dismiss me out of hand, assuming I do not have the background, have not done the research, or simpl do not know what I'm talking about.
This is not wordplay. Time dilation cannot be interpreted as anything except a change in measurement. Time itself is a human measurement. You are unable to refute any of my statements.
altonhare 3 years ago
Talk of "time travel" is a matter of reification of mathematical concepts. Measurement!=Reality. If I am counting photons from an object to measure time and I count 0 photons it is NOT because time stopped for the object, it is because my measurement is flawed. The measurement itself is not time, it is a human invention and inherently subjective. You may be interested to read about "empiricism-positivism".
altonhare 3 years ago
loook dude! I dont know what your trying to prove. It has worked for other 100 000 scientists, it should work for you. The theory of relativity is almost 100 years old so if someone had a problem with the stuff it would eventually come up.
mjufpn 3 years ago
Plenty of people have problems with it, actually. Not with the quantitative results, obviously, but with the conceptual core and the physical interpretation. Google "A Rational Cosmology".
altonhare 3 years ago