thats funny my hands are cold and it spins for me ? and i don't use my hands and it works for me I can place a ping pong ball in water and it will come to me without my hands every time.
So if I use one hand, and stop, change the direction, back and forth, this is convection too? With a glass over it? And if I impale the paper without touching it? Not so sure. Being able to replicate the visual elements of an effect does not mean you have replicated the effect itself.
In the interest of truth we should question -any- proposed cause as much as the created effect.
retards they probily just post these things cause they cant do them i did it on the other side of my cold room fool grow some balls and focus instead of trying to disprove it
He's not saying that ALL video's are fake just that there are alot of people out there who pray on other people ignorance (alot of the times to gain money under wrongful circumstances). You are free to make up your own minds on said videos, just use you head and feel free to question things if you're not certain on them! That's the real point here! THINK!!! Thanks for reading [=
Typically those who cannot make rational, logical comments without anger and swearing are themselves, irrational and foolish. Facts are barely relative in science, it's called quantum. PSI is nothing more than another form of energy. It has been proven in many scientific studies many times over, do your research before speaking out of ignorance. PSI wheels moved by actual PSI energy can be made to move under glass, stopped, and made to move in the other direction, this has been done many times
And what if you move it from 2 meters away? Or within a bowl of plastic? Or if you first rub your hand in ice? All of that examples I have made them in my videos to prove it's not heat, so, until you get a better hipothesis GTFO ¬¬"
@steelefist I plan to make a Vaccum Chamber to prove exactly that my friend, so just wait for it... If it was as easy as going to an University and they lend me one, I'll make the video tomorrow
I have a video that covers the PSI wheel with a glass bowl, and use a hair dryer to show that it is air-tight (and that heat doesn't create convection currents in a small enclosed space.
Do believe me about the convection currents? I have a second video showing that even when heated to 140+ degrees, still not even a twitch.
@ASmattman Funnily enough 10x that many people have watched Justin Beiber's Baby vid and I'm fairly sure they're standards of music fall into what rational humans call "wrong". Proof of psychic talents? Then do something original, not perform a trick that has been proven just that, a trick, in a new fashion. Tie your shoe laces without touching them, or stack pennies for example.
hi people to be honnest on the hole disclosure thing and if people beleve a scam artist like him then there the fools. not everything can be proven. they only want us to know so much. one word DISCLOSURE he is just another puppet of the industry there to make us think this but to be honnest if he scamed us on national tv then why beleve him now what u think im gonna be silenced like dmx pac jackson i think not. I AINT GOT NO STRINGS HAAAAAAAAAAAAA
anyone who believes in the paranormal is a stupid twat who needs to rethink their life and stop watching ghost videos on youtube, im glad people are finally confronting this mystic-mumbo-jumbo crap, too many people still believe in fairy tales in a modern era when almost everything can be explained by science, and by 'almost' i mean if it hasnt been explained by science already then it soon will be, nothing is left to the suppose'd super-natural for it does not exist
You sound like one of those wanna be skeptics with condescending agendas to ridicule and discredit anything that opposes their prejudices/orthodoxy. So, if someone believes in a peer-reviewed, meta-study that showed evidence of ESP under double-blind, automated controlled conditions is a stupid twat??
ive seen a girl make it go in both directions.... and she keeps her hand far away most of the time, explain this one to me please, if its a scam id like to know how she does it
these videos are what are making these things into scams. you never are shown a real youtube video allways a FAKE one they make so they are disproving shit.
@Wezdons7 The problem with disproving the "real" ones is that the people doing them often make so many excuses as to why their so called powers are not working when questions are asked or they are they are trying to prove their powers it under scientific conditions.
either way it is irrelevant because you shouldn't believe something until it is proven false, believe it when its proven true, and so far no psychic claim has ever been proven to be the result of supernatural powers,
I love that the psychic idustry is making 'millions of pounds every year' off supposedly scamming people (science of "Scams"), yet this chick has an erasor a pin and a peice of paper!!
@LUTHR0N If there is no air in the room how do you manage to breathe? I guess when you say there is no temperature, the room must be at absolute zero, which would make it hard for anything to move.
its people like you that make me sick. i despised this generation its full of skeptics no one believes anything you say even if you have solid facts and proof.
the thing is i understood that the warmth of the hands can make the psi wheel spin before i even started to work with psi... why am i still practicing it?
Because we are all capable of being psychic! I know this isnt gonna get through to many people but hey im just here to bring people confidence in their practices through chi and psi :)
Dont let this video fool you into the real power you are capable of!
/watch?v=H5NwRfMJgOQ&feature=related I would absolutely loveee for you guys to try and explain that. And stop talking down about this saying it's paranormal. Just because we can't explain it doesn't mean it's not real.
Exactly, there was a vid with someone doing it with a glass covering it. pretty much no heat wind or anythting was flowing through it, atleast not enough to make it move. What a party pooper. i actually do think it could work/
@RingstingDJ There are explanations for that too, look them up, there's a website called forgetomori(dot)com, there are plenty explanations for "paranormal" stuff
@RingstingDJ Well have no fear, asshole scientists can explain that! Obvious science can explain how the person must have dipped their hands in acid, and dissolved the glass why you weren't noticing. Then the person MUST have quickly shoved a metallic probe up their anus while your eyes were averted! Secretly, the object must have metal infused into it. Then the person simply used the air currents caused by the magnets to make it spin! Science explains everything!
There are some fakers who blow air across the surface of the table which bleeds under an uneven glass.
James Hydrick was caught doing this. They actually later sealed the fish tank he was using and he couldnt do it.
(keep in mind I believe in chi but I believe there are also a lot of fakers who should get exposed. Alot of the fakers are there to exploit others for their money. Real genuine teachers on the other hand are hard to find.)
@thesparitan wheater or not chi is real, the truth about energy surronding us all Is.. : / since no matter how you look at it, we're all just made out of matter which Is energy condenced.
@andypmz07 You haven't said anything other then energy is the main property of the universe, so how does that prove chi? Sure energy surrounds us and in fact we are energy, that does not than logically follow that we can control it with our minds. Chi doesn't exist and instead of trying to prove that it does you have only pointed out an obvious fact or also called a deepity. Something profound but untrue or true but trivial.
@thesparitan I wasn't trying to proove that you can control energy... and Its my fault the message makes no sence.. I must of thought of a reply, but only typed half of It up. I didn't re read any of it either.
Ah cmon no need hands for psiwheel.Only newbies using hands,cuz they can only turn it with hands.Your power central is your brain not your hands.So dislikes.
@SY4173 So hes not allowed to use science to find more reasonable explanations for what he cannot understand, where are you from the dark ages or something, seriously believing this shit without questioning it is the dumbest thing a human can do, the people perpetuating these hoax's and profiting off them them whilst exploiting those who are recently bereaved are the dark ones, course the use of the term dark being sounds like a religious buzz term, so u can can fuck off with that language
@tyson5476 Ikr? when you put aluminum foil in the oven it certainly doesn't spin :P fact, how come it takes practice to do this? BECAUSE IT IS NOT CONVECTION.
THIS IS ONLY PROOF TO PEOPLE WHO FEAR THEIR TRUE POTENTIAL. I used to be a hardcore skeptic until I realized that the main hurdle was not psychokinesis, it was SKEPTICISM! Your reality can only be what you believe is possible... why limit yourself?
@Alvsyn They made that video, but some people make videos claiming that they actually have psychic powers. Don't be disingenuous. They didn't invent the psi wheel. -.-
@LtShock You're missing the point, I never said they invented it and I know there are fakes out there; but what these people are doing is simply denouncing ALL possibility of it completely based on their own construction. It does seem like the most logical way to see it but stranger things have happened and I'm yet to see more evidence before I believe what these people say.
One thing I would like to point out about all these "scams" is that for the most part, there is no profit. Most of the videos "documenting" this make no profit, and few are even done in a gloating form. So what's the point?
this is just using a bad example of people attempting this as a parlour trick. however, the ones who do it through the jar arent using heat currents or wind. more info is found by researching noetic science. how the physical can be altered or affected by mental waves."the weight of a thought"
"The greatest stupidity I ever read ! Do you know what is a molecule ? Do you know the size of a molecule ?"
Do you know what is a necessary airflow in this case and what is a differential pressure ? You contributed nothing additonal with your latest post. The mechanism you describe is correct but it would only lead to a little shaking of a wheel (which is not a propeller but a symetric umbrella usually). it depends from distant of hand/bowl to judge it. It is no explanation for what i saw.
Oh God ! Are you really talking about PRESSURE, in this stupid open system ?
You should use your toilet paper in your mouth !
First of all, the airflow is turbulent, it is not laminar, as your little mind thinks.
Second, your hands will NEVER, be symmetrically arranged around the wheel, because they are not symmetrical and because you cannot stop your hands in the perfect position.
@dioginnnn "Can you prove that a unicorn does not exist?"
That is completely irrelevant to this subject. You had claimed that telekinesis doesn't exist; therefore, the onus lies on you to prove it. The burden of proof always lies on the person making a claim, regardless of it. If you made a claim, you either have justification for it; otherwise, you are being outright dishonest. If you don't know telekinesis doesn't exist, you could have at least said I don't know, or I don't believe....
@Witiinho "Don't be stupid. I just used this sentence as an example of something you can't prove,"
Such as the fallacious, gambit argument of the Invisible Pink Unicorn? Nope, The burden of proof always lies on the person making a claim, regardless of it. The concept, "The Burden of Proof Lies On Extraordinary Claims" is a common misconception & fallacious at all levels: 1) Extraordinary is very subjective. 2) This concept suggests that the onus lies only on the extraordinary, etc.
@dioginnnn Wow, you really do have that profound stupidity, bigotry, pseudo-skepticism, pseudo-intellectualism, and special pleading pumped up on your ass.. let me demonstrate your profound ignorance. First of all, the term, "Scientific proof" is an oxymoron. Second, in order for something to be scientific, it must be explanatory, testable, and falsifiable; otherwise, it's not science. Third, all scientific concepts are at best tentative and never proven whether you like it or not.
@dioginnnn Shove up your mathematical proofs are scientific proofs, your opinions/conclusions like telekinesis doesn't exist are based on the scientific method, your scientific theory that telekinesis is crap, telekinetic people are retarded, your Jesus, you saw the unicorn, Eastern Bunny, small cock, stupidity, bigotry, pseudo-skepticism, pseudo-intellectualism, and special pleading, and stick it right up to your ass!
@IceAges14Aces "Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs... " Shake your booty ! hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ! None of these three things you listed excludes a mathmatical proof. They are explanatory, testable, and falsifiable. Use your telekinetic powers to produce psiballs, which will replace the balls you don't have, you freak ! Telekinesis has no good evidences. You are bound to strive for things useless and misleading. FUCK YOU MOTHERFUCKER ! HHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
@dioginnnn You had mistaken. The scientific method doesn't possess the burden of proof application whatsoever and it's just a method of inquiry based on hypothesis testing facilitated by data collection. Furthermore, there's no such thing as proofs in the scientific method. All hypotheses, as well as theories, are tentative at best, concrete at worst. Nope, it's not ignorance, it's simple logic. Again, you're not expressing intellectual honesty. You either put up or just say I don't believe...
"All hypotheses, as well as theories, are tentative at best, concrete at worst."
You are tottaly wrong.
"The scientific method doesn't possess the burden of proof application whatsoever and it's just a method of inquiry based on hypothesis testing facilitated by data collection. "
You're shitting using your mouth.
The scientific method is a method ! Don't be stupid !
I can prove scientifically a proposition, using mathmatics.
@dioginnnn "You can use this method.... and maths."
Yeah sure you can. Tell you what: I'll call myself a retard if you can scientifically prove to me 1+1=2 using only the scientific method XD!!
Thanks for the stating the obvious. It is clear that you lack critical thinking & what is even worst is you had failed to grasp & abused the theory terminology. In addition, your arguments are fallacious & they show your profound bigotry.
Pseudo-skepticism & Pseudo-Intellectualism at its finest.
I'm still waiting for an evidence, only one, that teleikinesis exist.
IT DOESN'T EXIST.
" I'll call myself a retard if you can scientifically prove to me 1+1=2 using only the scientific method XD!!"
Lack of comprehension. It is a counterexample, for what you said. As I said, the scientifc method is used to investigate, but, based on it, you can conclude, and hopefuly, create a theory.
"In addition, you don't have any argument to defend the existence of the telekinesis"
Why should I? I'm not the one claiming it exist, but you're the one who stubbornly claims it doesn't exist, when it is in fact intellectual dishonesty and faith-based disbelief.
"it has no value for somone who believes in science."
Yeah, to the ones who accept scientific concepts as true and absolute, which is pretty much bigotry.
That means: "Oh god, I can't, because IT DOESN'T EXIST"
hahahahahahahahahahahahah
Telekinesis is something, that can be perfectly reproduced by science and science has a great relliability for the mankind. If you prefer to believe in something without positive evidences, with several negative evidences, and that can be reproduced by something well accepted, great ! Don't forget your medication little boy !
@dioginnnn "Can you prove I'm not telling the truth?"
1) Jesus is history and even if he were here at this time he wouldn't surf on the fucking Internet and start cussing like an imprudent moron! 2) & 3) Yeah, you did saw the unicorn and the Easter Bunny, under LSD! 4) Telekinesis you say? Well, why don't you start proving it by telekinetically lifting my balls up. Oh wait, you failed XD!
"If you want to believe in this stupidity, fuck you !"
"My theory : Telekinesis is a crap, telekinetic people are retarded AND unicorns does not exist" "That's not a theory, those are propositions, dumb-ass! I bet you even confused the terminology between theory in general and theory in science."
No, you are wrong.
These are not propositions. Decontextualization is not a good argumentative solution.
This sentence does not consist a proposition dumbass.
@dioginnnn "I can prove scientifically a proposition, using mathmatics."
Albert Einstein would definitely laugh his ass off if he heard you saying this. Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs due to the fact that they are a complete different beasts than scientific proofs. Even though Albert Einstein General Theory of Relativity has mathematical proofs, he has never stated that his scientific theory has been proven.
@dioginnnn What the fuck do those theories have to do anything with the justification that mathematical proofs are scientific proofs? Seriously, you're fucking retarded. Math proofs don't scientifically prove theories. Scientific theories are just hypotheses that have been prevalently supported by many experiments. Furthermore, there's always the possibility of it being rejected or modified. Even Newton's Theories (Which contained mathematical proofs) have been rejected you dimwit fuck...
"Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs... "
Newton is now dancing inside his tomb:
"Shake, shake, shake, shake, shake, shake, shake your booty"
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Let me teach you something. Expanding the kinetic theory of gases you can mathmatically prove by impossibility that you cannot reach the zero kelvin temperature.
If someone reach this temperature, the whole physics you know is not valid.
"Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs... "
@dioginnnn I'm not going to waste my time with an imprudent moron who has horrendously confused the terminology between scientific concepts and mathematical concepts, so let's put this to an end. Furthermore, your conclusions/opinions are not based on the scientific method, but bigotry. You think you know scientific methodology, but you don't. As I said, you're just a fucking bigot who lacks good judgmental skills and is highly, self-confident in prejudices.
Can really someone believe in unicorns, dwarves and telekinesis ?
We can't prove it doesn't exist, but if you want to believe it does, you should be sleeping now !
Take your propositions without hypotheses/theses, your mathematical proofs not scientific and use your telekinetic power to shut it inside your aaaaaaasssssssss you dick smeller !
@dioginnnn "My main evidence is that telekinesis tricks can be reproduced by phisical and chemical principles."
Again, that isn't evidence to the contrary. That is evidence that telekinetic feats can be easily duplicated by mundane factors & cause self-delusion if not done under controlled conditions.
"I have my opinion, based on the scientific method."
For the last time, If you want to express your opinon honestly, just say I don't believe in telekinesis since it has no burden.
@IceAges14Aces "That's not a theory, those are propositions, dumb-ass! I bet you even confused the terminology between theory in general and theory in science." Hahahahahahahaha Oh, god ! I'm talking to a door ! hahahahahahhahaha ! hahahahahahahahahaha ! hahahahahahahahahahaha ! Can you give ONE evidence that telekinesis exist ? "That's not a theory, those are propositions" OH GOOOOOOOOOOD ! These are not propositions, sice they don't have hypotheses/theses.
@dioginnnn "I have my opinion, based on the scientific method." "sice they don't have hypotheses/theses."
You clearly said your so-called theory or opinions are based on the scientific method, yet you admited that they don't have hypotheses? Yeah sure whatever retard. You just made a complete ass out of yourself....
and no estupido a proposition is a statement that affirms or denies something, which is either true or false.
"a proposition is a statement that affirms or denies something, which is either true or false."
It is consisted by a hypotheses/theses.
If you look at my sentence, only a stupid person, who believes he can move cocks all around the world without touching then, whould call it a proposition, since this sentence has no explicit hypotheses and theses.
lt's more reliable, in this case, to work in the second option.
Every stupid video about telekinsis on youtube can be explained and reproduced using basic phisical principles. This is a good evidence that it does not exist;
Now, you give me good evidences for the option 1.
@dioginnnn "Every stupid video about telekinsis on youtube can be explained and reproduced using basic phisical principles. This is a good evidence that it does not exist;"
Not really. It's actually evidence that the Youtube videos regarding telekinesis can be BS. Furthermore, the fact that telekinesis has been duplicated by trickery doesn't mean all the aspects of it are done that way. The logical fallacy here is the comparison of fraudulent telekinesis with all the aspects of it.
thats funny my hands are cold and it spins for me ? and i don't use my hands and it works for me I can place a ping pong ball in water and it will come to me without my hands every time.
gregknightstemplar 3 days ago
i can do it without using hands.
WargoDsssss 5 days ago
wtb i can do it without hands?
psychokoza 1 week ago
HE MUST BE AN ALIEN OR SUTIN!!
2012felixx 1 week ago
YOUR NOT WATCHING MY VIDEOS THX KAT!! Mark
MrMastermcz7 1 week ago
Kate is just the one who does everything lol
LoadingzX4 1 week ago
So if I use one hand, and stop, change the direction, back and forth, this is convection too? With a glass over it? And if I impale the paper without touching it? Not so sure. Being able to replicate the visual elements of an effect does not mean you have replicated the effect itself.
In the interest of truth we should question -any- proposed cause as much as the created effect.
TheSulphyr 1 week ago
Get fucked
turkanator123 2 weeks ago
retards they probily just post these things cause they cant do them i did it on the other side of my cold room fool grow some balls and focus instead of trying to disprove it
kiman9000 2 weeks ago
as to why the wheel spins underneath a glass bowl with no hands, check my latest video
toukoqouko 2 weeks ago
*prey
MissStephie1013 3 weeks ago
He's not saying that ALL video's are fake just that there are alot of people out there who pray on other people ignorance (alot of the times to gain money under wrongful circumstances). You are free to make up your own minds on said videos, just use you head and feel free to question things if you're not certain on them! That's the real point here! THINK!!! Thanks for reading [=
MissStephie1013 3 weeks ago
ive done the psi wheel sitting pretty far away so my breath or heat wouldnt effect it and i still got it to spin
obuscus1 3 weeks ago
disinfo. they conducted this scenario just to disprove the ability and then profit off it via a T.V. show
PipeSkin1 1 month ago
This proved a "video" was fake, but does that mean I will think its fake?, no.
Darkdragon3157 1 month ago
i stopped watching when he said ufo's were fake.
Bullpuma 1 month ago
Typically those who cannot make rational, logical comments without anger and swearing are themselves, irrational and foolish. Facts are barely relative in science, it's called quantum. PSI is nothing more than another form of energy. It has been proven in many scientific studies many times over, do your research before speaking out of ignorance. PSI wheels moved by actual PSI energy can be made to move under glass, stopped, and made to move in the other direction, this has been done many times
roma9292 1 month ago 2
And what if you move it from 2 meters away? Or within a bowl of plastic? Or if you first rub your hand in ice? All of that examples I have made them in my videos to prove it's not heat, so, until you get a better hipothesis GTFO ¬¬"
HULE88 1 month ago
@HULE88 lol. u go do it in a vacuum then (where there are no air currents)
steelefist 1 month ago
@steelefist I plan to make a Vaccum Chamber to prove exactly that my friend, so just wait for it... If it was as easy as going to an University and they lend me one, I'll make the video tomorrow
HULE88 1 month ago
i drank milk wile this wuz on
bigsybear 1 month ago
ok so the wheel under glass is heat from eeeeeeeeh? from what?
HitokageProduction 1 month ago
so if you dont use your hands to make a psi wheel spin is it the heat off your head
Treasurehunter11001 1 month ago 2
@Treasurehunter11001 hahahahah
lwrkj 1 month ago
Chi can create heat.
daboodeef179 1 month ago
what if the hands are farther away that it would not make a difference.
daboodeef179 1 month ago
How many of you did this to freak out your gullible friends?
LondonIrishRover 2 months ago
Paranormal isn't about things that can't be explained? So how someone can proper explain it?
And if it's explained, then still not a satisfied answer. Or worst, it's a scam.
Oh, what a dilemma!
Shaidon7 2 months ago
It's a rubber
LLOYD19851012 2 months ago in playlist More videos from scienceofscamsc4
ehem...
I have a video that covers the PSI wheel with a glass bowl, and use a hair dryer to show that it is air-tight (and that heat doesn't create convection currents in a small enclosed space.
Do believe me about the convection currents? I have a second video showing that even when heated to 140+ degrees, still not even a twitch.
650,000 people can't be wrong
ASmattman 2 months ago
@ASmattman Funnily enough 10x that many people have watched Justin Beiber's Baby vid and I'm fairly sure they're standards of music fall into what rational humans call "wrong". Proof of psychic talents? Then do something original, not perform a trick that has been proven just that, a trick, in a new fashion. Tie your shoe laces without touching them, or stack pennies for example.
sk8rfella 2 months ago
hi people to be honnest on the hole disclosure thing and if people beleve a scam artist like him then there the fools. not everything can be proven. they only want us to know so much. one word DISCLOSURE he is just another puppet of the industry there to make us think this but to be honnest if he scamed us on national tv then why beleve him now what u think im gonna be silenced like dmx pac jackson i think not. I AINT GOT NO STRINGS HAAAAAAAAAAAAA
spook290 2 months ago
if the PS I wheel is fake how am I able to move it just by starring at it not using my hands
knuckles991001 2 months ago
Now, telekinesis people, come with me, I'll pick a random car, and you make it fucking fly.
NO I WANT TO BE IN A ROOM WITH REALLY LIGHT OBJECTS LIKE, PAPER, AND HEATED AIR. BUT RLYZ IZ TEKLINESY.
LasseLundster 2 months ago 5
What is that music piece called in the beginning and at the end?
Matthijs3476 2 months ago
If all this is true and that heat is what makes the psi wheel spin the why is it that im able to spin it when my hands are freezing cold
MAC321ist 2 months ago
Wait hold on a Second, I'm seeing something wrong here.
how does a psi wheel work? Apparently, this can be done two ways.
This is a way that is a my favorite, and that is Energy. focusing your energy into the wheel to make it turn.
Definition of Convection: the transfer of energy in a fluid by the movement of the heated particles.
Ryhmproductions 2 months ago
anyone who believes in the paranormal is a stupid twat who needs to rethink their life and stop watching ghost videos on youtube, im glad people are finally confronting this mystic-mumbo-jumbo crap, too many people still believe in fairy tales in a modern era when almost everything can be explained by science, and by 'almost' i mean if it hasnt been explained by science already then it soon will be, nothing is left to the suppose'd super-natural for it does not exist
FunkyMunky1595 2 months ago
@FunkyMunky1595 How typical.....
You sound like one of those wanna be skeptics with condescending agendas to ridicule and discredit anything that opposes their prejudices/orthodoxy. So, if someone believes in a peer-reviewed, meta-study that showed evidence of ESP under double-blind, automated controlled conditions is a stupid twat??
This isn't skepticism....
IceAges14Aces 2 months ago
pause at 4:18
TheOnlineBusker 3 months ago
This is so exciting!
MrSupersonic113 3 months ago
ive seen a girl make it go in both directions.... and she keeps her hand far away most of the time, explain this one to me please, if its a scam id like to know how she does it
slikmix2005 3 months ago
@slikmix2005 how far is far away?
RelativelyHostile1 3 months ago
these videos are what are making these things into scams. you never are shown a real youtube video allways a FAKE one they make so they are disproving shit.
Wezdons7 3 months ago
@Wezdons7 The problem with disproving the "real" ones is that the people doing them often make so many excuses as to why their so called powers are not working when questions are asked or they are they are trying to prove their powers it under scientific conditions.
either way it is irrelevant because you shouldn't believe something until it is proven false, believe it when its proven true, and so far no psychic claim has ever been proven to be the result of supernatural powers,
Netruic 2 months ago in playlist More videos from scienceofscamsc4
I love that the psychic idustry is making 'millions of pounds every year' off supposedly scamming people (science of "Scams"), yet this chick has an erasor a pin and a peice of paper!!
harrothahobo 3 months ago
before i even see the answer, im guessing something to do with positive/negative charges :/
davelikescake1 3 months ago
@davelikescake1 hehe. Its all about the heat.:P
MJFAN666 3 months ago
@MJFAN666 DAMNIT! yeah kinda failed there :P but the telekinisis vid i was right :P
davelikescake1 3 months ago
This is bullshit, i can do it while my hand is a meter away from it while there is no air or temprature or whatever in the room
LUTHR0N 3 months ago 3
@LUTHR0N If there is no air in the room how do you manage to breathe? I guess when you say there is no temperature, the room must be at absolute zero, which would make it hard for anything to move.
Android18uk 2 weeks ago
nah its real, i can do it with my hands 1 foot away from it.
TheZephyrKid 3 months ago
Do we really need Kat (who has a BSc don't you know) to tell us how it works? Can't Derren do it? Or can't he be arsed.
dan4boi 3 months ago
Please, prove that video so..
/watch?v=H5NwRfMJgOQ&feature=fvwrel
Thanks.
guiso1207 3 months ago
@guiso1207 That telekinetic video you provided is nothing but another idiotic, waste of time bullshit telekinetic videos in Youtube.....
IceAges14Aces 3 months ago
For your skeptics..... How do you explain a psi wheel inside a box?
johnrpotter 3 months ago
or she just blew on it...
Tvmonster666 3 months ago
its people like you that make me sick. i despised this generation its full of skeptics no one believes anything you say even if you have solid facts and proof.
telekinovice 4 months ago
@telekinovice I've got a bridge for sale.
kidslovesatan 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@telekinovice its retards like you that get ripped off by dicks.
mrfanlogan 3 months ago
this chick is stupid
theavatarstoneburner 4 months ago
the thing is i understood that the warmth of the hands can make the psi wheel spin before i even started to work with psi... why am i still practicing it?
Because we are all capable of being psychic! I know this isnt gonna get through to many people but hey im just here to bring people confidence in their practices through chi and psi :)
Dont let this video fool you into the real power you are capable of!
Peace x
liquud 4 months ago
what they did not say was that you do not actually need hands to practice with psi wheel...
Aronther 4 months ago
118 people have cold hands.
videos4mydad 4 months ago 17
/watch?v=H5NwRfMJgOQ&feature=related I would absolutely loveee for you guys to try and explain that. And stop talking down about this saying it's paranormal. Just because we can't explain it doesn't mean it's not real.
SkiIIyx 4 months ago
Now expose it beneath glass bowls
Overlord76 4 months ago
k k but then how can i spin it in bowth ways to left and to right?
csongi12 4 months ago
why so many dislikes?O_O
freiheitsalv 4 months ago
Exactly, there was a vid with someone doing it with a glass covering it. pretty much no heat wind or anythting was flowing through it, atleast not enough to make it move. What a party pooper. i actually do think it could work/
RingstingDJ 4 months ago
@RingstingDJ There are explanations for that too, look them up, there's a website called forgetomori(dot)com, there are plenty explanations for "paranormal" stuff
freiheitsalv 4 months ago
@RingstingDJ Well have no fear, asshole scientists can explain that! Obvious science can explain how the person must have dipped their hands in acid, and dissolved the glass why you weren't noticing. Then the person MUST have quickly shoved a metallic probe up their anus while your eyes were averted! Secretly, the object must have metal infused into it. Then the person simply used the air currents caused by the magnets to make it spin! Science explains everything!
TheMummy516 4 months ago
Then how do some people move the psi wheel by covering it by an inverted glass jar.
pinealshiva 5 months ago
@pinealshiva
There are some fakers who blow air across the surface of the table which bleeds under an uneven glass.
James Hydrick was caught doing this. They actually later sealed the fish tank he was using and he couldnt do it.
(keep in mind I believe in chi but I believe there are also a lot of fakers who should get exposed. Alot of the fakers are there to exploit others for their money. Real genuine teachers on the other hand are hard to find.)
1NX9 4 months ago
@1NX9 You believe in chi, yeah I think you are just as ignorant as the people that believe the scam artist.
thesparitan 4 months ago in playlist More videos from scienceofscamsc4
@thesparitan
I believe what I have experience.
I dont promote it nor do I expect others to believe it.
1NX9 3 months ago
@thesparitan wheater or not chi is real, the truth about energy surronding us all Is.. : / since no matter how you look at it, we're all just made out of matter which Is energy condenced.
andypmz07 3 months ago
@andypmz07 You haven't said anything other then energy is the main property of the universe, so how does that prove chi? Sure energy surrounds us and in fact we are energy, that does not than logically follow that we can control it with our minds. Chi doesn't exist and instead of trying to prove that it does you have only pointed out an obvious fact or also called a deepity. Something profound but untrue or true but trivial.
thesparitan 3 months ago
@thesparitan I wasn't trying to proove that you can control energy... and Its my fault the message makes no sence.. I must of thought of a reply, but only typed half of It up. I didn't re read any of it either.
andypmz07 3 months ago
@andypmz07 Cool
thesparitan 3 months ago
Well it is still real
Darkdragon3157 5 months ago
the Illuminati just doesnt want us to know what our minds are capable of
atomicdude91 5 months ago 31
@atomicdude91 I completely agree.
seanievortex 4 months ago
@atomicdude91 Yeah, you're fucking mental.
nolovelost92 3 months ago
@atomicdude91 How do you know the illuminati exists?
roboneko77 1 month ago
Ah cmon no need hands for psiwheel.Only newbies using hands,cuz they can only turn it with hands.Your power central is your brain not your hands.So dislikes.
mithriandil 5 months ago
funny. i used one hand, and when my sister did the same it didnt work for her. convection currents circulate. search telekinesis legit
goo5976 5 months ago
this still dosent prove how the average human only uses 34% of the brian
MrCheesefrog 5 months ago
I can move a psi wheel inside of a glass cake dome.
MakoRuu 5 months ago
@MakoRuu My hands are no where near it.
MakoRuu 5 months ago
just another estimation.
vpluscurubaa 5 months ago
Comment removed
SY4173 5 months ago
@SY4173 WAKE UP ! HE HAS ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO SAY IT WAS A HOAX , IDIOT.
sammyBBes 5 months ago
@sammyBBes How about a glass cover????
IceAges14Aces 5 months ago
@IceAges14Aces What do you mean by a glass cover?
sammyBBes 5 months ago
@sammyBBes A psi wheel inside a glass dome......
IceAges14Aces 5 months ago
@IceAges14Aces Sorry i still dont understand what your saying, probably just me. At least im not so thick sculled to realize it was a hoax.
sammyBBes 5 months ago
@SY4173 Since when is science evil? Lol you sound like a Creationist right now.
PureSkill900 5 months ago
@SY4173 So hes not allowed to use science to find more reasonable explanations for what he cannot understand, where are you from the dark ages or something, seriously believing this shit without questioning it is the dumbest thing a human can do, the people perpetuating these hoax's and profiting off them them whilst exploiting those who are recently bereaved are the dark ones, course the use of the term dark being sounds like a religious buzz term, so u can can fuck off with that language
theblahman 5 months ago
Comment removed
SY4173 5 months ago
@tyson5476 Ikr? when you put aluminum foil in the oven it certainly doesn't spin :P fact, how come it takes practice to do this? BECAUSE IT IS NOT CONVECTION.
ryourhm 5 months ago
Rofl Do these guys seriously believe it's convection? It doesn't explain how you could do it across the room or with a glass dome over it.
also, What is heat? Heat is scientifically proven to be energy "which is what a psi or chi ball is made of. It's Just Energy!"
how come we have body heat? ENERGY.
ryourhm 5 months ago
THIS IS ONLY PROOF TO PEOPLE WHO FEAR THEIR TRUE POTENTIAL. I used to be a hardcore skeptic until I realized that the main hurdle was not psychokinesis, it was SKEPTICISM! Your reality can only be what you believe is possible... why limit yourself?
godzpark 5 months ago
@godzpark Amen.
ryourhm 5 months ago
A SCAM THAT THEY THEMSELVES INVENTED TO PROVE THEMSELVES THAT THEY WERE... Scamming... People... Using... Science..?
Either way, of course it was a scam... YOU MADE IT!
Alvsyn 5 months ago
@Alvsyn They made that video, but some people make videos claiming that they actually have psychic powers. Don't be disingenuous. They didn't invent the psi wheel. -.-
LtShock 5 months ago
@LtShock You're missing the point, I never said they invented it and I know there are fakes out there; but what these people are doing is simply denouncing ALL possibility of it completely based on their own construction. It does seem like the most logical way to see it but stranger things have happened and I'm yet to see more evidence before I believe what these people say.
Alvsyn 5 months ago
how do they make money off of chi energy?
sgtmjames 5 months ago
or you could just say there was a fan behind the camra ether way
scorpo187 6 months ago
science is depressing.
sgtmjames 6 months ago
So.... can some MONKS really LEVITATE then?
recyclecongress 6 months ago
oh look, derren brown. legit.
davosonic60 6 months ago
@davosonic60 haha!
darkpenguincowboy 6 months ago
Derren is such a spoil-sport!
PhilipOMeara 6 months ago
One thing I would like to point out about all these "scams" is that for the most part, there is no profit. Most of the videos "documenting" this make no profit, and few are even done in a gloating form. So what's the point?
mychinisnamedpaco 6 months ago
this is just using a bad example of people attempting this as a parlour trick. however, the ones who do it through the jar arent using heat currents or wind. more info is found by researching noetic science. how the physical can be altered or affected by mental waves."the weight of a thought"
TheNameIsFirefly 6 months ago
"The greatest stupidity I ever read ! Do you know what is a molecule ? Do you know the size of a molecule ?"
Do you know what is a necessary airflow in this case and what is a differential pressure ? You contributed nothing additonal with your latest post. The mechanism you describe is correct but it would only lead to a little shaking of a wheel (which is not a propeller but a symetric umbrella usually). it depends from distant of hand/bowl to judge it. It is no explanation for what i saw.
neo200772 6 months ago
Comment removed
dioginnnn 6 months ago
Comment removed
dioginnnn 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@neo200772
Oh God ! Are you really talking about PRESSURE, in this stupid open system ?
You should use your toilet paper in your mouth !
First of all, the airflow is turbulent, it is not laminar, as your little mind thinks.
Second, your hands will NEVER, be symmetrically arranged around the wheel, because they are not symmetrical and because you cannot stop your hands in the perfect position.
Third, heat transfer is a turbulent phenomena.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@neo200772
Fourth
Only a perfect crystal has the zero entropy, and so, this fucking piece of paper if not symmetrical, as nothing in your life.
TELEKINESIS DOES NOT EXIST.
Fifth
You cannot preview such a turbulent phenomena. Don't say it would shake the wheel, because there are too much variables to do that.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn "TELEKINESIS DOES NOT EXIST."
What evidence/reason do you have that justify this claim? By the way, the onus lies on you to prove it.
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
This is impossible to anyone to prove it.
Can you prove that a unicorn does not exist ?
I'ts the same problem.
The question here is made of evidences, but we can work in two directions;
1 - Search for evidences that suggest that telekinesis exists.
2- Search for evidences that suggest that telekinesis does not exist.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn "Can you prove that a unicorn does not exist?"
That is completely irrelevant to this subject. You had claimed that telekinesis doesn't exist; therefore, the onus lies on you to prove it. The burden of proof always lies on the person making a claim, regardless of it. If you made a claim, you either have justification for it; otherwise, you are being outright dishonest. If you don't know telekinesis doesn't exist, you could have at least said I don't know, or I don't believe....
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IceAges14Aces
"Can you prove that a unicorn does not exist?"
"That is completely irrelevant to this subject."
Don't be stupid. I just used this sentence as an example of something you can't prove,
but the evidences suggests that it doesn't exist.
Another example: The Big Bang.
Can you prove that it really heappened ? No.
But there are echoes in the universe, that are used as evidences.
Witiinho 6 months ago
@Witiinho "Don't be stupid. I just used this sentence as an example of something you can't prove,"
Such as the fallacious, gambit argument of the Invisible Pink Unicorn? Nope, The burden of proof always lies on the person making a claim, regardless of it. The concept, "The Burden of Proof Lies On Extraordinary Claims" is a common misconception & fallacious at all levels: 1) Extraordinary is very subjective. 2) This concept suggests that the onus lies only on the extraordinary, etc.
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IceAges14Aces
@IceAges14Aces
You are based on ignorance and cut by stupidity.
You think you know science, but you don't. (At all)
You are just a stupid person, who thinks that can move cocks all around the world without touching them.
In the next level, you will try to burn balls from distance.
hahahahahahahaha
If you want to believe in telekinesis instead of something well accepted as science, FUCK YOU !
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"As I said, you're just a fucking bigot who lacks good judgmental skills and is highly, self-confident in prejudices."
You forgot I'm Jesus, with some published papers !
I'm sending you to hell when you die, you son of a bitch !
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Give a hug in the Easter bunny for me, you freak!
"The burden of proof always lies on the person making a claim, regardless of it"
It means: OH GOD ! I CAN'T PROVE IT, BECAUSE IT IS FAKE !
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn Wow, you really do have that profound stupidity, bigotry, pseudo-skepticism, pseudo-intellectualism, and special pleading pumped up on your ass.. let me demonstrate your profound ignorance. First of all, the term, "Scientific proof" is an oxymoron. Second, in order for something to be scientific, it must be explanatory, testable, and falsifiable; otherwise, it's not science. Third, all scientific concepts are at best tentative and never proven whether you like it or not.
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@dioginnnn Shove up your mathematical proofs are scientific proofs, your opinions/conclusions like telekinesis doesn't exist are based on the scientific method, your scientific theory that telekinesis is crap, telekinetic people are retarded, your Jesus, you saw the unicorn, Eastern Bunny, small cock, stupidity, bigotry, pseudo-skepticism, pseudo-intellectualism, and special pleading, and stick it right up to your ass!
*Albert Einstein sticks out his tongue at you*
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs... "
This is the level of a telekinetic person, without good evidences.
hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahaha
Who told you that, a psi-friend ?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Go take your medicine you pink unicorn cock sucker.
Use your powers to die ! It will be worth you cocaine sniffer !
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"You had claimed that telekinesis doesn't exist; therefore, the onus lies on you to prove it."
This is not the scientific method, this is the method of fucking ignorance.
In the scientific method, you can propose theories even without proofs.
You take your evidences, you propose a theory, and then, based on your experiments, you make a conclusion.
I propose that telekinesis does not exist.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn You had mistaken. The scientific method doesn't possess the burden of proof application whatsoever and it's just a method of inquiry based on hypothesis testing facilitated by data collection. Furthermore, there's no such thing as proofs in the scientific method. All hypotheses, as well as theories, are tentative at best, concrete at worst. Nope, it's not ignorance, it's simple logic. Again, you're not expressing intellectual honesty. You either put up or just say I don't believe...
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"All hypotheses, as well as theories, are tentative at best, concrete at worst."
You are tottaly wrong.
"The scientific method doesn't possess the burden of proof application whatsoever and it's just a method of inquiry based on hypothesis testing facilitated by data collection. "
You're shitting using your mouth.
The scientific method is a method ! Don't be stupid !
I can prove scientifically a proposition, using mathmatics.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn "You can use this method.... and maths."
Yeah sure you can. Tell you what: I'll call myself a retard if you can scientifically prove to me 1+1=2 using only the scientific method XD!!
Thanks for the stating the obvious. It is clear that you lack critical thinking & what is even worst is you had failed to grasp & abused the theory terminology. In addition, your arguments are fallacious & they show your profound bigotry.
Pseudo-skepticism & Pseudo-Intellectualism at its finest.
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Ace
This is a conclusion, based on propositions.
I'm still waiting for an evidence, only one, that teleikinesis exist.
IT DOESN'T EXIST.
" I'll call myself a retard if you can scientifically prove to me 1+1=2 using only the scientific method XD!!"
Lack of comprehension. It is a counterexample, for what you said. As I said, the scientifc method is used to investigate, but, based on it, you can conclude, and hopefuly, create a theory.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn "IT DOESN'T EXIST."
Argument from ignorance (again)
"In addition, you don't have any argument to defend the existence of the telekinesis"
Why should I? I'm not the one claiming it exist, but you're the one who stubbornly claims it doesn't exist, when it is in fact intellectual dishonesty and faith-based disbelief.
"it has no value for somone who believes in science."
Yeah, to the ones who accept scientific concepts as true and absolute, which is pretty much bigotry.
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"Why should I?"
That means: "Oh god, I can't, because IT DOESN'T EXIST"
hahahahahahahahahahahahah
Telekinesis is something, that can be perfectly reproduced by science and science has a great relliability for the mankind. If you prefer to believe in something without positive evidences, with several negative evidences, and that can be reproduced by something well accepted, great ! Don't forget your medication little boy !
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
I'm Jesus, I saw an unicorn, Easter Bunny gave me a chocolate bar and I have telekinetic powers.
Can you prove I'm not telling the truth ?
If you want to believe in this stupidity, fuck you !
While I'm publishing papers in US, you are trying to move my cock without touching it.
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
I think you should believe in magic tricks too, they are more interesting !
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn "Can you prove I'm not telling the truth?"
1) Jesus is history and even if he were here at this time he wouldn't surf on the fucking Internet and start cussing like an imprudent moron! 2) & 3) Yeah, you did saw the unicorn and the Easter Bunny, under LSD! 4) Telekinesis you say? Well, why don't you start proving it by telekinetically lifting my balls up. Oh wait, you failed XD!
"If you want to believe in this stupidity, fuck you !"
Wow, great argument
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"My theory : Telekinesis is a crap, telekinetic people are retarded AND unicorns does not exist" "That's not a theory, those are propositions, dumb-ass! I bet you even confused the terminology between theory in general and theory in science."
No, you are wrong.
These are not propositions. Decontextualization is not a good argumentative solution.
This sentence does not consist a proposition dumbass.
5)Telekinesis exist. hahahahahahahahahaha
dioginnnn 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IceAges14Aces
1) No, that proves that people cannot understand the behavior of Jesus nowadays.
2) & 3) The Unicorn and the Easter Bunny are telekinetic beings !
4) Yes I failed, you don't even have balls. hahahahahahhahaah
"If you want to believe in this stupidity, fuck you !" [2]
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn "I can prove scientifically a proposition, using mathmatics."
Albert Einstein would definitely laugh his ass off if he heard you saying this. Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs due to the fact that they are a complete different beasts than scientific proofs. Even though Albert Einstein General Theory of Relativity has mathematical proofs, he has never stated that his scientific theory has been proven.
You sir, made my day!
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs... "
OOOOOOOOOOHHHHHH MYYYYYYYYY GOOOOOOOOOOD !
Hhahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha !
Newton is now shaking inside his tomb !
hahahahahahahahahahahahha
I took a print of this moment, and I'm sending it to the Guiness for you !
Have you ever heard, for exemple, of the Quantum Theory of Molecules ?
Have you ever heard of the Born-Openheimer theory ?
Have you ever heard of the kinetic theory of gases ?
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn What the fuck do those theories have to do anything with the justification that mathematical proofs are scientific proofs? Seriously, you're fucking retarded. Math proofs don't scientifically prove theories. Scientific theories are just hypotheses that have been prevalently supported by many experiments. Furthermore, there's always the possibility of it being rejected or modified. Even Newton's Theories (Which contained mathematical proofs) have been rejected you dimwit fuck...
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs... "
Newton is now dancing inside his tomb:
"Shake, shake, shake, shake, shake, shake, shake your booty"
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Let me teach you something. Expanding the kinetic theory of gases you can mathmatically prove by impossibility that you cannot reach the zero kelvin temperature.
If someone reach this temperature, the whole physics you know is not valid.
"Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs... "
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn I'm not going to waste my time with an imprudent moron who has horrendously confused the terminology between scientific concepts and mathematical concepts, so let's put this to an end. Furthermore, your conclusions/opinions are not based on the scientific method, but bigotry. You think you know scientific methodology, but you don't. As I said, you're just a fucking bigot who lacks good judgmental skills and is highly, self-confident in prejudices.
Have a nice day estupido!
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs... "
Shake shake shake !
Are you really insisting in this epic stupidity ?
You don't even know what is a proposition !
It doesn't matter. The important thing here is that "telekinesis" can be reproduced by scientific principles.
This is a negative evidence.
As there are none good evidences to defend "telekinesis", it is not reliable.
Furthermore, your propositions doesn't have hypotheses and theses.
hahahahahahahaha
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs... "
hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahaha
I just can't stop laughing !
You really made my year !
dioginnnn 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IceAges14Aces
Ok, go lick th balls you need to, then come back to shit through your mouth.
I'm sending you some toilet paper, to use after brushing teeth.
hahhahhahahahahahahahahahahahaha
"Mathematical proofs are not scientific proofs... "
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
You made my whole year !
Shake shake shake !
As you CANNOT give us good evidences for telekinesis, and you know that,
I think the unicorn is more relliable then telekinesis.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
You are better than Jerry Seinfeld !
Please continue shitting through the mouth !
Can really someone believe in unicorns, dwarves and telekinesis ?
We can't prove it doesn't exist, but if you want to believe it does, you should be sleeping now !
Take your propositions without hypotheses/theses, your mathematical proofs not scientific and use your telekinetic power to shut it inside your aaaaaaasssssssss you dick smeller !
dioginnnn 6 months ago
Comment removed
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"Scientific theories are just hypotheses that have been prevalently supported by many experiments. "
You should buy a good book and start reading it.
Let's go Newton !
Shake shake shake ! Shake shake shake ! Shake your booty !
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I'm still waiting for an evidence that telekinesis is relliable.
TELEKINESIS DOES NOT EXIST. IT IS FAKE !
Man, I never thought I could find such a silliness in a person.
Congratulations ! You changed my life !
dioginnnn 6 months ago
Comment removed
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
Sorry to burst your bubble happy castrated boy.
dioginnnn 6 months ago in playlist Documentaries 2
The ignorance is the greatest problem of mankind. [3]
Telekinesis my ass !
dioginnnn 6 months ago
Comment removed
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
My main evidence is that telekinesis tricks can be reproduced by phisical and chemical principles.
Psi-Wheel -> Heat Transfer
Pirokinesis -> Exothermic reactions
Moving an object without touching -> Eletrostatics
Therefore, the conclusion based on this evidences cannot be other than this.
"TELEKINESIS DOES NOT EXIST"
And someone can try to prove I'm wrong.
I have my opinion, based on the scientific method.
This is not the absolute truth, as I can't prove it.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn "My main evidence is that telekinesis tricks can be reproduced by phisical and chemical principles."
Again, that isn't evidence to the contrary. That is evidence that telekinetic feats can be easily duplicated by mundane factors & cause self-delusion if not done under controlled conditions.
"I have my opinion, based on the scientific method."
For the last time, If you want to express your opinon honestly, just say I don't believe in telekinesis since it has no burden.
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
Scientists all around the world use this method to investigate.
You can use this method in physics, chemistry and maths.
As I said, I used the method, to make my conclusion.
"That is evidence that telekinetic feats can be easily duplicated
by mundane factors & cause self-delusion if not done under controlled conditions."
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha !
Or, that is evidence that telekinesis is only ordinary scientific principles.
(Which can be fuly observed and explained)
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
Can you give ONE evidence that telekinesis exist ?
ONLY ONE !
hahahahahahahahah !
It doesn't exist !
Telekinesis is like an unicorn.
You cannot prove it does not exist, but, based on evidences you can suggest a theory,
wich is truth, till someone proves you are wrong.
My theory : "Telekinesis is a crap, telekinetic people are retarded AND unicorns does not exist"
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn "ONLY ONE !.......haha....It doesn't exist!"
-Argument from ignorance.
"You are tottaly wrong."
Justify it then.
"My theory : Telekinesis is a crap, telekinetic people are retarded AND unicorns does not exist"
That's not a theory, those are propositions, dumb-ass! I bet you even confused the terminology between theory in general and theory in science.
"The scientific method is a method ! Don't be stupid !"
Duh, that's what I said, estupido.
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn "I have my opinion, based on the scientific method." "sice they don't have hypotheses/theses."
You clearly said your so-called theory or opinions are based on the scientific method, yet you admited that they don't have hypotheses? Yeah sure whatever retard. You just made a complete ass out of yourself....
and no estupido a proposition is a statement that affirms or denies something, which is either true or false.
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"a proposition is a statement that affirms or denies something, which is either true or false."
It is consisted by a hypotheses/theses.
If you look at my sentence, only a stupid person, who believes he can move cocks all around the world without touching then, whould call it a proposition, since this sentence has no explicit hypotheses and theses.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
In addition, you don't have any argument to defend the existence of the telekinesis.
As all telekintic stupid powers can be reproduced by scientifc principles, it has no reliability.
"That is evidence that telekinetic feats can be easily duplicated by mundane factors & cause self-delusion if not done under controlled conditions."
It is a possibility, but as you cannot prove, or do something that only telekinetic people can do,
it has no value for somone who believes in science.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
"That's not a theory, those are propositions, dumb-ass! I bet you even confused the terminology between theory in general and theory in science."
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
You don't even know what is a proposition !
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I just can't stop laughting,
You said, at least, three stupid things in only one sentence !
Congratulations, I think you're going to the Guinness !
dioginnnn 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IceAges14Aces
I prefer to believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
lt's more reliable, in this case, to work in the second option.
Every stupid video about telekinsis on youtube can be explained and reproduced using basic phisical principles. This is a good evidence that it does not exist;
Now, you give me good evidences for the option 1.
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@dioginnnn "Every stupid video about telekinsis on youtube can be explained and reproduced using basic phisical principles. This is a good evidence that it does not exist;"
Not really. It's actually evidence that the Youtube videos regarding telekinesis can be BS. Furthermore, the fact that telekinesis has been duplicated by trickery doesn't mean all the aspects of it are done that way. The logical fallacy here is the comparison of fraudulent telekinesis with all the aspects of it.
IceAges14Aces 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IceAges14Aces
I have my opinion, based on the scientific method.
This is not the absolute truth, as I can't prove it.
Now we can try to make an analysis on the other side of the coin.
Let'stry to prove that telekinesis exist:
Which evidences do I have, tha suggests that telekinesis is a reliable thing ?
None. (You may give some)
Which conclusion can I make based on it ?
"TELEKINESIS DOES NOT EXIST" (again).
dioginnnn 6 months ago
@IceAges14Aces
People who believes in telekinesis are always trying to respond with vague statements,
and does not present favorable evidence, which naturally causes mistrust.
"Furthermore, the fact that telekinesis has been duplicated by trickery doesn't mean all the aspects of it are done that way."
Yes, and we believe in the Easter Bunny.
It produces a hole in telekinesis and makes it unreliable.
If you want to believe in telekinesis even without favorable evidence, good luck !
dioginnnn 6 months ago