I realise nobody is gonna like what I'm gonna say, but here it goes. If Albert Einstein hadn't invented nuclear fission and thus the atom bomb, wouldn't more lives be lost? Let me put it this way. The Atomic bomb has horrible consequences and nobody is disputing that, but isn't it used more as a deterrent than a weapon? If there were no nukes in during the cold war, wouldn't there just have been a ground offensive? Counties (like Israel) all over the world are safe from attack thanks to nukes.
M.A.D. is the acronym they use to describe nuclear deterrents Mutual Assured Destruction. put simply if two parties go to war with nukes both parties get blown to sh*t. no winner.
Nuclear power is the only real answer for clean power. IT takes more fossil fuel to create hydrogen than it saves. It is ironic and it figures the NoNuke crowd is responsible for more pollution & dependence on foreign oil today!
The best thing you can do for the Environment is kill an environmentalist and the best thing for animal conservation is kill a PITA idiot if they ever wonder in the woods!
Until the day the fusion is acceptably controlled, we can still use the hydro-electrical / natural-gas methods (both still have some negative impact) and also choose an efficient way to use energy.
And last but not least, I must say that I do agree with the complete suppression of nuclear weapons.
Yea, I can do without any loose nukes, I am glad Bush went in and made sure Saddam was disarmed for sure. He was much closer than anybody speculated to having a functional warhead.
"shall the rest of the world do the same things with USA?.." I wished they would, we could just sit back and ignore the rest of the world and play arm chair General for a while.
I would almost agree if you were talking about fusion and without military aims. Anyway, the artificial fusion is not yet completely controlled. I might support research projects that intends to control it just in case they where for peaceful purposes (i.e. producing energy in a clean and cheap way) and with a strict international control.
Nowadays energy nuclear obtaining process means to use nuclear fission, and it has proven to be an extremely contaminating one.
The bones of every living vertibate on earth (including every human) contains trace amounts of Strontium 90 which comes from the above-ground nuclear tests by america in the 50's and 60's. New evidence shows the Japanese wanted to surrender before the US nuked them in 1945, but these were deliberately ignored by Truman, who wnated to scare the russians. NO NUKES! If your leader tells you we need nukes, kill them.
Whats the point of even having nukes theres no logic to it. We shouldn't have to defend ourselfs from ourselfs. Im likeing ya videos so far. And there trippy in some parts=cool man.
America, bring the soldiers home.Iraqi war is an altar of blood sacrifice Freemasons have erected for bleeding American soldiers as offering to Satan and the Temple.Around 5000 American soldiers have died since 20-03-2003 when GW Bush invaded Iraq.After hanging Saddam Hussein and confirming that he was dead the Illumanati had his throat slit with a raser and his blood shed as a ritual because hanging only could not shed Saddam Hussein's BLOOD. It's the BLOOD of American soldiers that Bush wants.
Love this video. I have done tons of research into how society has been created. Currently looking into converting our vehicles to run on hydrogen. Any info you have on that would be great.
Gold is a diagmetic that vibrates at 1,000 Hz. Platinum + Cobalt make strong magnets (Bedini motors). There is no God particle, they are wasting billions of dollars. E=MC2 is fine if you assume the magnetic vacuum of space is holding the matter together and the vortex center (#9) is that energy source. Everything around you is frequency. Einstein was an Ashenazi Jew, those oligarchs who control us.
Good message! Well done. Bring them home now. Arrest Bush and Cheney for the lies that led to an illegal war, war crimes and other atrocities. They are criminals.
As I was growing up during the Cold war. during the 60's I lived with 5 miles of Rocky Flats where they made the plutonium triggers. In broomfield Co there is a high rate of leukemia nd infant mortality . I lived in Arvada and I do not know the stats there.I can find out. The rate of radiation is high. Thyroid disease has picked by 75% over the alst 20 yrs.
I heard that radon gas in Leadville, CO, is among the highest in the world. For example, living in a house in Leadville without proper ventilation can expose people to the equivalent of 2,000 cigarettes per day.
true. The mines up there are the leading cause of lung cancer and emphzyma. My great grandfather worked those mines when he first came here from milan italy in the 1900.I believe most my family were born up there after that. Than moved to denver. Than mined in crisman colo. Leadville is the highest elevation in colorado and hard to breath anyway if not from the region. I had no problem until i got older. Now since i have lived here in the nw for 22 yrs.. I am unable to live in high altitude
Thanks for your reply and sharing. I visited Leadville for a few days several years ago. Very beautiful town and country, indeed. But I found it very difficult to breath because I have emphyzema - gosh, it's over 14,200 feet in elevation and is the highest municipality in the U.S.
Sam Colt made us equal,='s The need to fight the unjust unfair rules of inslavement,When anyone gets the short end of the stick they will never give up on fighting to set things right!The Last Union's rules are rules of peace.
This video is awesome at full screen. Really great imagery and other special effects. Thanks for this, the message and song are overwhelmingly great too. You deserve some kind of award or at least acknowledgement for this video.
Like Yoko Ono has said, we need to learn to make money from the Peace Industry instead of the War Industry. By making products that are peaceful to people and the evironment is the only way we are going to survive on this planet as a species. The irony is Hydrogen is what brought this planet life and humans have used it to bring nothing but death and destruction. Like all things, it can be used for good or evil, the choice is our own.
How we go about our daily lives with this threat of annihilation hanging over our heads is hard to fathom. Are we unconscious? Oblivious? Retarded? Moronic? So lost in the daze and drug induced electro-euphoria that we can't comprehend the idiotic careless self indulgent pathology of our living? Wake.
Since the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings, nuclear weapons have been detonated on over two thousand occasions for testing purposes and demonstration purposes. The only countries known to have detonated such weapons are (chronologically) the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, France, the People's Republic of China, India, Pakistan, and North Korea.
The use of any nuclear weapon capable of destroying a buried target will necessarily produce enormous numbers of civilian casualties.
No earth-burrowing missile can penetrate deep enough into the earth to contain an explosion with a nuclear yield even as small as 1 percent of the 15 kiloton Hiroshima weapon.
The explosion simply blows out a massive crater of radioactive dirt, which rains down on the local region with an especially intense and deadly fallout.
The Pentagon claims that the use of the B61-11 minimizes the risks of "collateral damage". According to US. military planners, "potential adversaries" are hiding their WMDs in "fortified bunkers" below more than 100 feet of concrete. Yet test results indicate that the low yield B61-11 has never penetrated more than 20 feet below the ground.
The Bush administration has gone one step further in defining the use of tactical nuclear weapons, which are now part of America's preemptive arsenal. Essentially they are described defensive weapons. Under the preemptive nuclear doctrine, they are specifically identified for use in conventional war theaters.
The B61-11 is casually described as causing an underground explosion without threatening "the surrounding civilian population".
The Pentagon has blurred the distinction between conventional battlefield weapons and nuclear bombs. Already during the Clinton Administration, the Pentagon was calling for the use of the "nuclear" B61-11 bunker buster bomb, suggesting that because it was "underground", there was no toxic radioactive fallout which could affect civilians.
In an utterly twisted logic, the nuclear bunker buster bomb is presented as an instrument of peace-making and regime change, which will enhance global security. It is intended to curb the dangers of WMD proliferation by "nonstate organizations (terrorist, criminal)" and "rogue states". Pentagon propaganda has carefully distorted the nature of this bomb.
The use of the B61-11 was also contemplated during the 2003 bombing and invasion of Iraq. In this regard, the B61-11 was described as "a precise, earth-penetrating low-yield nuclear weapon against high-value underground targets", which included Saddam Hussein's underground bunkers: "If Saddam was arguably the highest value target in Iraq, then a good case could be made for using a nuclear weapon like the B61-11 to assure killing him and decapitating the regime" - Defense Dept.
In October 2001, in the immediate wake of 9/11, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld envisaged the use of the B61-11 in Afghanistan. The targets were Al Qaeda cave bunkers in the Tora Bora mountains.
Rumsfeld stated at the time that while the "conventional" bunker buster bombs "'are going to be able to do the job', ... he did not rule out the eventual use of nuclear weapons."
There are indications that the Bush administration does not exclude using thermonuclear bunker buster bombs in the Middle East war theater. These weapons were specifically developed for use in post Cold War "conventional conflicts with third world nations".
While the "guidelines" do not exclude other categories of nukes in the US or Israeli nuclear arsenal, Pentagon "scenarios" in the Middle East are currently limited to the use of tactical nuclear weapons including the B61-11 bunker buster bomb, a so-called Nuclear Earth Penetrator. It is a Weapon of Mass Destruction in the real sense of the word. Its utilization by the US or Israel in the Middle East war theater would trigger a nuclear holocaust.
In the showdown with Tehran over its alleged nuclear weapons program, these Pentagon "guidelines" would allow, subject to presidential approval, for the launching of punitive bombings using "mini-nukes" or tactical thermonuclear weapons.
The Bush administration's new nuclear doctrine contains specific "guidelines" which allow for "preemptive" nuclear strikes against "rogue enemies" which "possess" or are "developing" weapons of mass destruction.
The preemptive nuclear doctrine which applies to Iran and North Korea calls for "offensive and defensive integration". It explicitly allows the preemptive use of thermonuclear weapons in conventional war theaters.
Current US nuclear weapons policy is immoral, illegal, militarily unnecessary, and dreadfully dangerous. The risk of an accidental or inadvertent nuclear launch is unacceptably high.
Far from reducing these risks, the Bush administration has signaled that it is committed to keeping the US nuclear arsenal as a mainstay of its military power - a commitment that is simultaneously eroding the international norms that have limited the spread of nuclear weapons and fissile materials for 50 years.
Much of the current US nuclear policy has been in place since before I was secretary of defense, and it has only grown more dangerous and diplomatically destructive in the intervening years.
- Robert S. McNamara (US Secretary of Defense under the Kennedy and Johnson administrations)
Within two weeks after an attack the occupants of most shelters could safely stop using them, or could work outside the shelters for an increasing number of hours each day. Exceptions would be in areas of extremely heavy fallout such as might occur downwind from important targets attacked with many weapons, especially missile sites and very large cities. To know when to come out safely, occupants either would need a reliable fallout meter to measure the changing radiation dangers.
Fortunately for all living things, the danger from fallout radiation lessens with time. The radioactive decay, as this lessening is called, is rapid at first, then gets slower and slower. The dose rate (the amount of radiation received per hour) decreases accordingly.
By that time their extremely wide dispersal and radioactive decay would make them much less dangerous. Only where such tiny particles are promptly brought to earth by rain- outs or snow-outs in scattered "hot spots," and later dried and blown about by the winds, would these invisible particles constitute a long-term and relatively minor post-attack danger.
The smallest fallout particles those tiny enough to be inhaled into a person's lungs are invisible to the naked eye. These tiny particles would fall so slowly from the four-mile or greater heights to which they would be injected by currently deployed Soviet warheads that most would remain airborne for weeks to years before reaching the ground.
The largest, heaviest fallout particles reach the ground first, in locations close to the explosion. Many smaller particles are carried by the winds for tens to thousands of miles before falling to earth. At any one place where fallout from a single explosion is being deposited on the ground in concentrations high enough to require the use of shelters, deposition will be completed within a few hours.
Each contaminated particle continuously gives off invisible radiation, much like a tiny X-ray machine while in the mushroom cloud, while descending, and after having fallen to earth. The descending radioactive particles are carried by the winds like the sand and dust particles of a miles-thick sandstorm cloud except that they usually are blown at lower speeds and in many areas the particles are so far apart that no cloud is seen.
Many thousands of tons of earth from the crater of a large explosion are pulverized into trillions of particles. These particles are contaminated by radioactive atoms produced by the nuclear explosion. Thousands of tons of the particles are carried up into a mushroom-shaped cloud, miles above the earth. These radioactive particles then fall out of the mushroom cloud, or out of the dispersing cloud of particles blown by the winds thus becoming fallout.
An all-out nuclear war between Russia and the United States would be the worst catastrophe in history, a tragedy so huge it is difficult to comprehend. Even so, it would be far from the end of human life on earth. The dangers from nuclear weapons have been distorted and exaggerated, for varied reasons. These exaggerations have become demoralizing myths, believed by millions of Americans.
Today, the United States is the only nuclear power that continues to deploy nuclear weapons outside its own territory. The approximately 480 nuclear bombs in Europe are intended for use in accordance with NATO nuclear strike plans against targets in Russia or countries in the Middle East such as Iran and Syria.
Despite claims that the U.S. nuclear stockpile is safe and reliable, the number of accidents involving America's atomic arsenal is a matter of concern. The Department of Defense first published a list of nuclear weapon accidents in 1968 which detailed 13 serious nuclear weapon accidents between 1950-1968. An updated and revised list released in 1980 cataloged 32 accidents between1950-1980. However, this second compilation failed to include some of the accidents covered in the 1968 list.
The U.S. has 12,000 nuclear weapons of all types stockpiled.
The US Air Force currently operates just over 500 ICBMs at around 15 missile complexes.
The US Navy currently has 14 SSBN Ohio-class submarines deployed. Each submarine is equipped with a complement of 24 Trident II missiles. Approximately 12 U.S. attack submarines are equipped to launch, but do not currently carry nuclear Tomahawk missiles. Sea-launch weapons make up the majority of weapons declared under START II rules.
The U.S. conducted an extensive nuclear testing program. 1054 tests were conducted between 1945 and 1992. The exact number of nuclear devices detonated is unclear because some tests involved multiple devices while a few failed to explode or were designed not to create a nuclear explosion. The United States ceased atmospheric testing after November 4, 1962 before the Partial Test Ban Treaty.
Two nuclear weapons were used by the United States against Japan in World War II in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Altogether, the two bombings killed an estimated 200,000 Japanese citizens and injured another 130,000. The overwhelming majority of the casualties were civilian.
Self preservation is the stronger part. Self destruction comes only from not understanding or not being able to express the true self. It is last resort in the face of utter unhappiness, I think.
There's an international treaty, called the Fissban, to ban production of fissile materials except under international control. The United States has been strongly opposed to it. Nevertheless, it did come to the General Assembly which overwhelmingly voted in favour of it. The disarmament commission vote was 147 to 1, the United States being the 1.
Unless a verifiable fissile materials treaty is passed and implemented, the world very well may move towards nuclear disaster.
Beautiful, awesome, fantastic, your video is in a word: Art.
People who talk of peaceful use never factor in the huge hydrocarbon cost of building the plant, extracting the ore, tearing down the building after its very short life.
The plants have 2 vent radio-isotopes (poisons) to keep the containment dome from over pressurizing, putting poison into the air we breath. They use some of the waste to build bombs & bullets that spread more poisons into our air when used.
As a kid I used to think: it's ok for hydrogen to be the energy source of the sun (fission/fusion) where it's a stable system and there are no people, but it's stupid to be used in nuclear power stations on earth where billions of people live. As kids we are told it's clean and safe. Maybe I need to go back to being and thinking as the child I once was though. It's like: our technology is so unsound and we shouldn't use it until it is sound - but they keep rushing things here - mostly for money.
Methinks the W.O.P.R. summed up thermonuclear war the best:
A strange game; the only way to win is not to play.
Snarkbutt 2 years ago
Having nukes kept us out of nuclear war since WW2 ended.
Maybe you can explain how you're going to talk China Russia India Pakistan and soon Iran into getting rid of their nukes.
Conan568 2 years ago
great video!!!!!!!!!!!!!
gete0 2 years ago
HUMAN ARE JUST INSECTS
THE ABOMB IS OUR RAID
SPRAY AT WILL
and have a nice LAST day on this...
...toilet earth that
MAN CREATED ON THE 8th DAY
B3boy 3 years ago
I realise nobody is gonna like what I'm gonna say, but here it goes. If Albert Einstein hadn't invented nuclear fission and thus the atom bomb, wouldn't more lives be lost? Let me put it this way. The Atomic bomb has horrible consequences and nobody is disputing that, but isn't it used more as a deterrent than a weapon? If there were no nukes in during the cold war, wouldn't there just have been a ground offensive? Counties (like Israel) all over the world are safe from attack thanks to nukes.
Davotheravo123 3 years ago
That is my thinking aswell...
Bombs are used to equal the powers of nations. It's for scaring ppl.
MaDrung 3 years ago
No Nations! No Nukes!;)
aatmaa 3 years ago
/user/NufffRespect
/user/JipsiIsDrunk
/watch?v=ceLyrKPhJIk
When seeking truth people should be careful what they ask for.
T
TRUTHINLIEZ 3 years ago
Do you think you're helping? Do you think this is helpful? Where do you go from here?
This isn't very good.
Azaradell 3 years ago
It helps you change your inner picture of the world.
MaDrung 3 years ago
I think we are capable of doing that ourselves.
Davotheravo123 3 years ago
Image sucked, word sucked, manipulator of mind reduced to emotional mistrust of all things.
qizalia 3 years ago
Good job!
TheFlocklessShepherd 3 years ago
awesome! great vid man
freequeshowe 3 years ago
good video!
aires12345678 3 years ago
That was artistically poignant.
druidess01 3 years ago
wow what kind of drugs did i just inhale
charlievrw 3 years ago
beautiful, haunting song.
you sing great,
thanks for your thoughts and work.
wisjoh 3 years ago
good job.
blk59 3 years ago
Actually in my opinion, the nukes have kept the peace for 60 years, but if that Iranian madmen has them. I fear for our safety.
duzaman7 3 years ago
im confused. whats that about no more nukes? whos got nukes? and home who home?
PassionOfTheHeist321 3 years ago
Awesome, good point
burnoutnt 3 years ago
your singing skill sucks
lrroberb 3 years ago
????????????????
wisjoh 3 years ago
he sent me a friend invite. so i checked his vid. i don't mind getting random invite from amateur singers who can at least sing though.
lrroberb 3 years ago
The song is Creep by Radiohead.
desheik 3 years ago
LOL, so, Thom Yorke is a bad singer and can't sing trough. Come on now!
FIDESetRATIOihtys 3 years ago
comment bellow is for "Irroberb"
p.s. Thom is the best!
FIDESetRATIOihtys 3 years ago
truly excellent.
antigurus 3 years ago
man this some deep video... good job...
justielira 3 years ago
A Japanese company, Genepax, watch?v=CrxfMz2eDME
has built a device that quickly cracks hydrogen
from water and are running a car with it.
Our Hydrocarbon Economy is a dinosaur.
tomkenn8dy 3 years ago
Assured mutual destruction shouldn't be the deterrent for war. Love Radiohead
CarrieSnider 3 years ago
Pretty sure this one holds your most active 10 seconds on YouTube.
qizalia 3 years ago
Very well done, I love the song by radiohead btw
shaniquatheguineapig 3 years ago
M.A.D. is the acronym they use to describe nuclear deterrents Mutual Assured Destruction. put simply if two parties go to war with nukes both parties get blown to sh*t. no winner.
Kabuki0009 3 years ago
Nuclear power is the only real answer for clean power. IT takes more fossil fuel to create hydrogen than it saves. It is ironic and it figures the NoNuke crowd is responsible for more pollution & dependence on foreign oil today!
FreedomsPatriot 3 years ago
You're hilarious ;)
Crusading4Truth 3 years ago
All true too!
The best thing you can do for the Environment is kill an environmentalist and the best thing for animal conservation is kill a PITA idiot if they ever wonder in the woods!
FreedomsPatriot 3 years ago
He said 'Having harnessed the power of the sun and stars, we have chosen to make warheads.'
That statement is pro-nuclear power, anti-nuke.
Pay attention...
meeputube 3 years ago
Until the day the fusion is acceptably controlled, we can still use the hydro-electrical / natural-gas methods (both still have some negative impact) and also choose an efficient way to use energy.
And last but not least, I must say that I do agree with the complete suppression of nuclear weapons.
KybernetesWintermute 3 years ago
Yea, I can do without any loose nukes, I am glad Bush went in and made sure Saddam was disarmed for sure. He was much closer than anybody speculated to having a functional warhead.
FreedomsPatriot 3 years ago
mmm... curious excuse... shall the rest of the world do the same things with USA?.. I mean, in case they hide some nukes...
KybernetesWintermute 3 years ago
"shall the rest of the world do the same things with USA?.." I wished they would, we could just sit back and ignore the rest of the world and play arm chair General for a while.
FreedomsPatriot 3 years ago
I would almost agree if you were talking about fusion and without military aims. Anyway, the artificial fusion is not yet completely controlled. I might support research projects that intends to control it just in case they where for peaceful purposes (i.e. producing energy in a clean and cheap way) and with a strict international control.
Nowadays energy nuclear obtaining process means to use nuclear fission, and it has proven to be an extremely contaminating one.
KybernetesWintermute 3 years ago
TO FREEDOMSPATRIOT:
KybernetesWintermute 3 years ago
lucid methodology fo a message, two thumbs up.
verndewd 3 years ago
great video man, love the message nice job. Peace! Joey
JoeyJr702 3 years ago
Why is "don't kill people" so confusing to some I will never understand. Nice work.
Kiraly222 3 years ago
i'm declaring you and anyone that watches this video unlawful enemy combatants.
if you could just meet me at guanotanamo that would be great. bring a towel.
REVHATCHELL 3 years ago
The bones of every living vertibate on earth (including every human) contains trace amounts of Strontium 90 which comes from the above-ground nuclear tests by america in the 50's and 60's. New evidence shows the Japanese wanted to surrender before the US nuked them in 1945, but these were deliberately ignored by Truman, who wnated to scare the russians. NO NUKES! If your leader tells you we need nukes, kill them.
alien8ted 3 years ago
Yeah, but that's not the ONLY way its in our bodies. It's also used in medicine. Strontium 90 that is.
L3THALx1NJ3CT10N 3 years ago
Funny thought, Mr Lay was the name of my math teacher. Geometry, think i got a c- .
Or was it Algebra? chalkboards and chalk rub me the wrong way.
qizalia 3 years ago
Actually.. you sound a bit like Leonard Cohen.! at least to me. Great video and message..a very importasnt video did you produce. excellent!
ladydawn1973 3 years ago
where have all the girls gone? it feels so mannish here anymore, unless patrikas is one. pattiLTL i refuze to click on you.
qizalia 3 years ago
Nuclear power is dangerous and they have no way to safely deal with waste!
nowellian 3 years ago
Well said.
arrrrghSky 3 years ago
Whats the point of even having nukes theres no logic to it. We shouldn't have to defend ourselfs from ourselfs. Im likeing ya videos so far. And there trippy in some parts=cool man.
666HellKnight 3 years ago
No Nukes!
Peace Peace Peace Peace Peace Peace Peace Love Love Love Love Love Love Love Love
RevolutionaryJam 3 years ago
Make peace not nukes!
No Nukes!
nowellian 3 years ago
all ur videos r very high quality stuff!!
longjoy 3 years ago
You look so stevie wonder in that shot. I want to hear you sing now. Go on dance more too.
qizalia 3 years ago
that sounds like creep by radiohead. i was just playing that on my guitar.
NWOkillininthenameof 3 years ago
its def the same riff
ledzppln45 3 years ago
bring
them
home
.
skibby 3 years ago
America, bring the soldiers home.Iraqi war is an altar of blood sacrifice Freemasons have erected for bleeding American soldiers as offering to Satan and the Temple.Around 5000 American soldiers have died since 20-03-2003 when GW Bush invaded Iraq.After hanging Saddam Hussein and confirming that he was dead the Illumanati had his throat slit with a raser and his blood shed as a ritual because hanging only could not shed Saddam Hussein's BLOOD. It's the BLOOD of American soldiers that Bush wants.
adikiny 3 years ago 2
Very true, great video..not overdone with stock footage. Well done for getting the message just right!
melbguy1 3 years ago
Love this video. I have done tons of research into how society has been created. Currently looking into converting our vehicles to run on hydrogen. Any info you have on that would be great.
lots of luv
Deanna
xoxoxoxoxo
selfoasis 3 years ago 3
Good message, great video.
The clean up will take great effort, but its most definately worthwhile, a future for all is of course more promising
not a select few.:)
urquiza78 3 years ago 3
Hare Krishna,
Yes i don't belong here.....this is not my home. i belong with the Lord.
Jhulanyatradd 3 years ago
Peace to you bro'
We are one.
Gold is a diagmetic that vibrates at 1,000 Hz. Platinum + Cobalt make strong magnets (Bedini motors). There is no God particle, they are wasting billions of dollars. E=MC2 is fine if you assume the magnetic vacuum of space is holding the matter together and the vortex center (#9) is that energy source. Everything around you is frequency. Einstein was an Ashenazi Jew, those oligarchs who control us.
"A child has beaten me at simplicity."
Diogenes of Sinope
wasuretta 3 years ago
excelente!!!
stylechuntaro 3 years ago
Oh wow, very nice;)
missgriffin77 3 years ago
Sorry about the Atari, It Slipped~
CoollyThat 3 years ago
You message is
Megaphone
to hear , Luv the sound of Radiohead
Will add to my favorite to help in SHOUT !
luv n peace
adam2dahlia 3 years ago
Brill video great msg, crazy old world. thank you for sharing.
madzndean 3 years ago
excellent work on this vid. great message, thnx for posting :)
jadeevalley 3 years ago
Thanks for video,peace and love...
dieneshugi 3 years ago
Mr DS
You are my Ally
Stay Cool and Keep Warm
Feel the breathe as you bathe in Her sweet mystery
Spirit NEVER SURRENDERS
We are ready for ALL that is due to the CHILDREN OF the LOGOS
Love over death over gold over all else
M A
bloomingslowly969 3 years ago
nicely done video, peace from Logan's World
hollyslater65 3 years ago
Excellent video. If we can't stop this insanity, many will lose their lives.
Love, Hope, Peace, & Christ Is With Us All,
Cal-el
CalJennings 3 years ago
Hey I really enjoyed this, what version of Creep did you use?
urbanfleur 3 years ago
It's live from an acoustic radio station performance.
desheik 3 years ago
Wow i wish I could find it somewhere to download
urbanfleur 3 years ago
Great video and message. Thanks for sharing.
GuildOfAbundance 3 years ago
one of the sweetest video i have seen on here.
HHO Peace to you
This rules in my world
czarwright 3 years ago
Excellent Message*****
BRING THEM ALL HOME SAFE!
Peace~
Cindy
karaokeoriginal1s 3 years ago
great video and message!
filmzRcool 3 years ago
excellent vid. peace :)
Kohl93 3 years ago
The bomb was built, and science wept.
120casst 3 years ago 2
Good message! Well done. Bring them home now. Arrest Bush and Cheney for the lies that led to an illegal war, war crimes and other atrocities. They are criminals.
terraceterra 3 years ago 2
As I was growing up during the Cold war. during the 60's I lived with 5 miles of Rocky Flats where they made the plutonium triggers. In broomfield Co there is a high rate of leukemia nd infant mortality . I lived in Arvada and I do not know the stats there.I can find out. The rate of radiation is high. Thyroid disease has picked by 75% over the alst 20 yrs.
aliveformyself 3 years ago
I heard that radon gas in Leadville, CO, is among the highest in the world. For example, living in a house in Leadville without proper ventilation can expose people to the equivalent of 2,000 cigarettes per day.
desertjournalonline 3 years ago
true. The mines up there are the leading cause of lung cancer and emphzyma. My great grandfather worked those mines when he first came here from milan italy in the 1900.I believe most my family were born up there after that. Than moved to denver. Than mined in crisman colo. Leadville is the highest elevation in colorado and hard to breath anyway if not from the region. I had no problem until i got older. Now since i have lived here in the nw for 22 yrs.. I am unable to live in high altitude
aliveformyself 3 years ago
Thanks for your reply and sharing. I visited Leadville for a few days several years ago. Very beautiful town and country, indeed. But I found it very difficult to breath because I have emphyzema - gosh, it's over 14,200 feet in elevation and is the highest municipality in the U.S.
desertjournalonline 3 years ago
I need a 62 inch plasma.
aliveformyself 3 years ago
good message, lets hope somebody do something. and only death and pain will win a nuclear war.
rommel5055 3 years ago
Very cool message & vid! (post-bonghit! LOL!)
Fav'd & five! :)
ShortbusMooner 3 years ago
Very good message!
citizenkong 3 years ago
Wow that was trully powerful. Great vid
Joy
Fringe111 3 years ago
Sam Colt made us equal,='s The need to fight the unjust unfair rules of inslavement,When anyone gets the short end of the stick they will never give up on fighting to set things right!The Last Union's rules are rules of peace.
richardbolin 3 years ago
Wow. That was some kind of genius. Scary, unnerving, yet somehow beautiful. Great work.
1966BOBBY 3 years ago
This video is awesome at full screen. Really great imagery and other special effects. Thanks for this, the message and song are overwhelmingly great too. You deserve some kind of award or at least acknowledgement for this video.
desertjournalonline 3 years ago 3
desertjournalonline - thanks for this great share!
5*s - awesome job on the vid, desheik!
nameofthepen 3 years ago
Thanks.
desheik 3 years ago
That was awesome. Quite apocalyptic. Loved the unplugged 'Creep.'
dnHooligan 3 years ago
Like Yoko Ono has said, we need to learn to make money from the Peace Industry instead of the War Industry. By making products that are peaceful to people and the evironment is the only way we are going to survive on this planet as a species. The irony is Hydrogen is what brought this planet life and humans have used it to bring nothing but death and destruction. Like all things, it can be used for good or evil, the choice is our own.
Peace, Love and Pride always.
Take Care, Chuck :)
chuck1967 3 years ago
Well put, Chuck, I thought.
One trail leads to a better world for all life ... the other path straight to hell.
Our choice.
Wolfiemouse 3 years ago
True, well done.
MiGP1981 3 years ago
Very nice.
ACORCASE 3 years ago
How we go about our daily lives with this threat of annihilation hanging over our heads is hard to fathom. Are we unconscious? Oblivious? Retarded? Moronic? So lost in the daze and drug induced electro-euphoria that we can't comprehend the idiotic careless self indulgent pathology of our living? Wake.
MistiCal147 3 years ago
WAke and then what. I think most are aware something is wrong but it is so overwhelming that, alone, one feels sterile.
Shultzgti 3 years ago
Smokin'
jezeppie 3 years ago
Exceptional.
Peace.
IamYournot33 3 years ago
You're the fuckin man. Fived. Faved. You make kick ass vids...your words are venomous...your message is TRUTH. BigRespect!
ItsFilthy 3 years ago
I liked it.
Somalid 3 years ago 2
Since the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings, nuclear weapons have been detonated on over two thousand occasions for testing purposes and demonstration purposes. The only countries known to have detonated such weapons are (chronologically) the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, France, the People's Republic of China, India, Pakistan, and North Korea.
imnotretardedyo 3 years ago
Righteous.
e74ever 3 years ago 2
The use of any nuclear weapon capable of destroying a buried target will necessarily produce enormous numbers of civilian casualties.
No earth-burrowing missile can penetrate deep enough into the earth to contain an explosion with a nuclear yield even as small as 1 percent of the 15 kiloton Hiroshima weapon.
The explosion simply blows out a massive crater of radioactive dirt, which rains down on the local region with an especially intense and deadly fallout.
aROSHOMATIC 3 years ago
I like the smug puffed up smirk the General's wear on TV as they relish the possibility of using their death toys. God help us.
dermonkeyboi 3 years ago
The Pentagon claims that the use of the B61-11 minimizes the risks of "collateral damage". According to US. military planners, "potential adversaries" are hiding their WMDs in "fortified bunkers" below more than 100 feet of concrete. Yet test results indicate that the low yield B61-11 has never penetrated more than 20 feet below the ground.
aROSHOMATIC 3 years ago
The Bush administration has gone one step further in defining the use of tactical nuclear weapons, which are now part of America's preemptive arsenal. Essentially they are described defensive weapons. Under the preemptive nuclear doctrine, they are specifically identified for use in conventional war theaters.
aROSHOMATIC 3 years ago
The B61-11 is casually described as causing an underground explosion without threatening "the surrounding civilian population".
The Pentagon has blurred the distinction between conventional battlefield weapons and nuclear bombs. Already during the Clinton Administration, the Pentagon was calling for the use of the "nuclear" B61-11 bunker buster bomb, suggesting that because it was "underground", there was no toxic radioactive fallout which could affect civilians.
aROSHOMATIC 3 years ago
In an utterly twisted logic, the nuclear bunker buster bomb is presented as an instrument of peace-making and regime change, which will enhance global security. It is intended to curb the dangers of WMD proliferation by "nonstate organizations (terrorist, criminal)" and "rogue states". Pentagon propaganda has carefully distorted the nature of this bomb.
aROSHOMATIC 3 years ago
The use of the B61-11 was also contemplated during the 2003 bombing and invasion of Iraq. In this regard, the B61-11 was described as "a precise, earth-penetrating low-yield nuclear weapon against high-value underground targets", which included Saddam Hussein's underground bunkers: "If Saddam was arguably the highest value target in Iraq, then a good case could be made for using a nuclear weapon like the B61-11 to assure killing him and decapitating the regime" - Defense Dept.
aROSHOMATIC 3 years ago
In October 2001, in the immediate wake of 9/11, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld envisaged the use of the B61-11 in Afghanistan. The targets were Al Qaeda cave bunkers in the Tora Bora mountains.
Rumsfeld stated at the time that while the "conventional" bunker buster bombs "'are going to be able to do the job', ... he did not rule out the eventual use of nuclear weapons."
aROSHOMATIC 3 years ago
There are indications that the Bush administration does not exclude using thermonuclear bunker buster bombs in the Middle East war theater. These weapons were specifically developed for use in post Cold War "conventional conflicts with third world nations".
aROSHOMATIC 3 years ago
While the "guidelines" do not exclude other categories of nukes in the US or Israeli nuclear arsenal, Pentagon "scenarios" in the Middle East are currently limited to the use of tactical nuclear weapons including the B61-11 bunker buster bomb, a so-called Nuclear Earth Penetrator. It is a Weapon of Mass Destruction in the real sense of the word. Its utilization by the US or Israel in the Middle East war theater would trigger a nuclear holocaust.
aROSHOMATIC 3 years ago
In the showdown with Tehran over its alleged nuclear weapons program, these Pentagon "guidelines" would allow, subject to presidential approval, for the launching of punitive bombings using "mini-nukes" or tactical thermonuclear weapons.
aROSHOMATIC 3 years ago
The Bush administration's new nuclear doctrine contains specific "guidelines" which allow for "preemptive" nuclear strikes against "rogue enemies" which "possess" or are "developing" weapons of mass destruction.
The preemptive nuclear doctrine which applies to Iran and North Korea calls for "offensive and defensive integration". It explicitly allows the preemptive use of thermonuclear weapons in conventional war theaters.
aROSHOMATIC 3 years ago
Exquisite. Really.
e74ever 3 years ago
Current US nuclear weapons policy is immoral, illegal, militarily unnecessary, and dreadfully dangerous. The risk of an accidental or inadvertent nuclear launch is unacceptably high.
4I8EP 3 years ago
Far from reducing these risks, the Bush administration has signaled that it is committed to keeping the US nuclear arsenal as a mainstay of its military power - a commitment that is simultaneously eroding the international norms that have limited the spread of nuclear weapons and fissile materials for 50 years.
4I8EP 3 years ago
Much of the current US nuclear policy has been in place since before I was secretary of defense, and it has only grown more dangerous and diplomatically destructive in the intervening years.
- Robert S. McNamara (US Secretary of Defense under the Kennedy and Johnson administrations)
4I8EP 3 years ago
Within two weeks after an attack the occupants of most shelters could safely stop using them, or could work outside the shelters for an increasing number of hours each day. Exceptions would be in areas of extremely heavy fallout such as might occur downwind from important targets attacked with many weapons, especially missile sites and very large cities. To know when to come out safely, occupants either would need a reliable fallout meter to measure the changing radiation dangers.
Jonaslk 3 years ago
Fortunately for all living things, the danger from fallout radiation lessens with time. The radioactive decay, as this lessening is called, is rapid at first, then gets slower and slower. The dose rate (the amount of radiation received per hour) decreases accordingly.
Jonaslk 3 years ago
By that time their extremely wide dispersal and radioactive decay would make them much less dangerous. Only where such tiny particles are promptly brought to earth by rain- outs or snow-outs in scattered "hot spots," and later dried and blown about by the winds, would these invisible particles constitute a long-term and relatively minor post-attack danger.
Jonaslk 3 years ago
The smallest fallout particles those tiny enough to be inhaled into a person's lungs are invisible to the naked eye. These tiny particles would fall so slowly from the four-mile or greater heights to which they would be injected by currently deployed Soviet warheads that most would remain airborne for weeks to years before reaching the ground.
Jonaslk 3 years ago
The largest, heaviest fallout particles reach the ground first, in locations close to the explosion. Many smaller particles are carried by the winds for tens to thousands of miles before falling to earth. At any one place where fallout from a single explosion is being deposited on the ground in concentrations high enough to require the use of shelters, deposition will be completed within a few hours.
Jonaslk 3 years ago
Each contaminated particle continuously gives off invisible radiation, much like a tiny X-ray machine while in the mushroom cloud, while descending, and after having fallen to earth. The descending radioactive particles are carried by the winds like the sand and dust particles of a miles-thick sandstorm cloud except that they usually are blown at lower speeds and in many areas the particles are so far apart that no cloud is seen.
Jonaslk 3 years ago
Many thousands of tons of earth from the crater of a large explosion are pulverized into trillions of particles. These particles are contaminated by radioactive atoms produced by the nuclear explosion. Thousands of tons of the particles are carried up into a mushroom-shaped cloud, miles above the earth. These radioactive particles then fall out of the mushroom cloud, or out of the dispersing cloud of particles blown by the winds thus becoming fallout.
Jonaslk 3 years ago
FACT - When a nuclear weapon explodes near enough to the ground for its fireball to touch the ground, it forms a crater.
Jonaslk 3 years ago
MYTH - Fallout radiation from a nuclear war would poison the air and all parts of the environment. It would kill everyone.
Jonaslk 3 years ago
An all-out nuclear war between Russia and the United States would be the worst catastrophe in history, a tragedy so huge it is difficult to comprehend. Even so, it would be far from the end of human life on earth. The dangers from nuclear weapons have been distorted and exaggerated, for varied reasons. These exaggerations have become demoralizing myths, believed by millions of Americans.
Jonaslk 3 years ago
For supposedly being so smart we sure show a lot of stupid.
fereznekoff 3 years ago
Great video!!!!!!
LOVE
PEACE
FLOWER POWER
Psychedalien 3 years ago
What kind of paranoid delusional idiots would build thousands of nuclear weapons and spread them all over the world?
papago094 3 years ago
An American President.
chopin65 3 years ago
Today, the United States is the only nuclear power that continues to deploy nuclear weapons outside its own territory. The approximately 480 nuclear bombs in Europe are intended for use in accordance with NATO nuclear strike plans against targets in Russia or countries in the Middle East such as Iran and Syria.
ACORCASE 3 years ago
Despite claims that the U.S. nuclear stockpile is safe and reliable, the number of accidents involving America's atomic arsenal is a matter of concern. The Department of Defense first published a list of nuclear weapon accidents in 1968 which detailed 13 serious nuclear weapon accidents between 1950-1968. An updated and revised list released in 1980 cataloged 32 accidents between1950-1980. However, this second compilation failed to include some of the accidents covered in the 1968 list.
damontanablu 3 years ago
The U.S. has 12,000 nuclear weapons of all types stockpiled.
The US Air Force currently operates just over 500 ICBMs at around 15 missile complexes.
The US Navy currently has 14 SSBN Ohio-class submarines deployed. Each submarine is equipped with a complement of 24 Trident II missiles. Approximately 12 U.S. attack submarines are equipped to launch, but do not currently carry nuclear Tomahawk missiles. Sea-launch weapons make up the majority of weapons declared under START II rules.
Occlane 3 years ago
The U.S. conducted an extensive nuclear testing program. 1054 tests were conducted between 1945 and 1992. The exact number of nuclear devices detonated is unclear because some tests involved multiple devices while a few failed to explode or were designed not to create a nuclear explosion. The United States ceased atmospheric testing after November 4, 1962 before the Partial Test Ban Treaty.
Occlane 3 years ago
Two nuclear weapons were used by the United States against Japan in World War II in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Altogether, the two bombings killed an estimated 200,000 Japanese citizens and injured another 130,000. The overwhelming majority of the casualties were civilian.
Occlane 3 years ago
Well done!
grasshopper321 3 years ago
Watch here on YT:
The Lies Will Not Stand !! Politics in the USA
The TRUTH will set you free
... but first, it will piss you off
;-)
NeaFrea 3 years ago
it seems self destruction is part of our nature.
woohoo1551 3 years ago
Self preservation is the stronger part. Self destruction comes only from not understanding or not being able to express the true self. It is last resort in the face of utter unhappiness, I think.
Jonaslk 3 years ago
Beautiful!
zegreeenbuds 3 years ago
Good argument, great vid.
saguaro88 3 years ago
nice editing. very nice. you got skillzzzz.
yeah... hydrogen...
peace
IChoseTheRedPill 3 years ago
Yes, it looks very beautiful burning light years away. Pictures of people living near Chernobyl, not so beautiful.
Peace.
sinorcemoss 3 years ago
stop watching TV
saltnpepper101 3 years ago
There's an international treaty, called the Fissban, to ban production of fissile materials except under international control. The United States has been strongly opposed to it. Nevertheless, it did come to the General Assembly which overwhelmingly voted in favour of it. The disarmament commission vote was 147 to 1, the United States being the 1.
Unless a verifiable fissile materials treaty is passed and implemented, the world very well may move towards nuclear disaster.
jezeppie 3 years ago
Very cool.
dazootoob 3 years ago 2
hydrogen can be seperated from oxygen(water) and burnt, we can fuel cars on water, now.
wasy35 3 years ago 3
Exactly. But in order to do so we must first dethrone the oil syndicate and convince people into reworking the infrastructure around hydrogen.
zamore333 3 years ago
good luck with that.
wasy35 3 years ago
So why aren't we?
desheik 3 years ago
Beautiful, awesome, fantastic, your video is in a word: Art.
People who talk of peaceful use never factor in the huge hydrocarbon cost of building the plant, extracting the ore, tearing down the building after its very short life.
The plants have 2 vent radio-isotopes (poisons) to keep the containment dome from over pressurizing, putting poison into the air we breath. They use some of the waste to build bombs & bullets that spread more poisons into our air when used.
TexanCyclist 3 years ago 2
Thanks, and good points.
desheik 3 years ago
As a kid I used to think: it's ok for hydrogen to be the energy source of the sun (fission/fusion) where it's a stable system and there are no people, but it's stupid to be used in nuclear power stations on earth where billions of people live. As kids we are told it's clean and safe. Maybe I need to go back to being and thinking as the child I once was though. It's like: our technology is so unsound and we shouldn't use it until it is sound - but they keep rushing things here - mostly for money.
fr3thinker 3 years ago 2
Radiation belongs in outerspace. Our atmosphere protects us from it so why should we be releasing it from the inside? It's quite ridiculous.
zamore333 3 years ago
Preserve and nourish the inner child.
desheik 3 years ago