Comparison of 60 FPS video to 300 FPS High Speed video

[BassManNv]

Wow, this is a badly put together video.

[deathsound95]

That's the best p.o.s camera I've seen in a long time.

[Oslokiddo]

youtube is 30 fps :D

[1danyol1]

This is a terrible demonstration...

[wrt54gs7]

This video playback is around 5 to 8fps...

[Megadeth6633]

I think the video is too choppy to appreciate a 300 fps video. compression fail.

[CigaretteSmokes]

I learned: a guy with a 300 fps cam got a lot of friends, while the poor guy with the 60fps cam just do it alone.

[Broadercasting]

@jachvideos The vertical resolution of the eye is about 70Hz - check your monitor refresh rate. Douglas Trumball's experiments with Showscan film suggests it is the OPTIMUM frame rate for motion PORTRAYAL. In a cinema each frame is effectively shown two or three times using a shutter to reduce the flicker which would be unbearable to watch shown at a native 24fps.

[jachvideos]

dont have difference

the human eye see at 24 fps, so dont heve difference for us of 30.000 fps and 30 fps

[mitchellvoy]

@jachvideos we may see 24fps but if you go and watch a 24 frame video and there is fast motion it willl look blury

[wang1433]

@jachvideos

I use a 30 fps camcorder, and it blurs on the down swing.

[ydyammo]

@jachvideos

Filming at 24 frames per second actually means you have a whole list of restrictions as to how fast the camera may move/pan and how fast objects may move without looking distorted.

boallen DOT com SLASH fps-compare.html

Perhaps our consciousness can not separate the images beyond 24fps, but our eyes can certainly see the difference, so please stop spreading this old mis-conception.

[jachvideos]

@ydyammo

ok, if u say :/

[jasontree111]

@jachvideos yes we see at 24 fps but if a video is less then that there are "missed" frames which make things blur thus if theres more frames then theres les frames to "miss" making the video smoother...

[BorkaBonum]

@jachvideos

Uh - the human eye does not work the same as camera optics or LCD panels. Claiming the human eye "sees" at 24 frames per second, as little as any frame-rate, is down-right stupid.

You'll notice a world of differences with a playback of 24 frames and 60 frames per second. Either it'd be viewed from a CRT, LCD, projector or any medium alike.

[jachvideos]

@BorkaBonum thanks for aweser a 11 mounths old comment ¬¬

[Das0s]

yes, it's noticeable when it's slowed down, but this isn't substantial argument that the human eye can see the differance in this sorta fps :P

[dalv11]

Thanks for the cool video!