Climate Change Debate : NPC Canberra 19/07/2011 Part II of V

[winterstellar]

When I see that deformed, ugly face, I switch off. Moncton is a madman and has NO credentials whatsoever in any field of science! He\s an ignorant and uneducated nutter!!

[BigDon62]

@winterstellar {1} Your comments hear disgust me, it seems to pass muster from left scum like you to use as a perverse form of argument someone's physical differences in an attempt to score a political point. Your intellect can't even stretch to spelling his name correctly & the left media like The ABC, Sydney Morning Herald & The Age had the gall to jump up & down when Lord Monckton made certain comments about Garnaut ! For which Lord Monckton apologised unreservedly.

[BigDon62]

@winterstellar {2} You & others likes you remind me of the Nazi filth we all thought was eradicated in 1945 clearly the raise of The Greens & the extreme ALP are on a par with The Third Reich & as a consequence don't be surprised if the likes of me crush you into submission like we did to your perverse Nazi heroes were all those years ago ! If you think I'll ever apologise for calling low life filth like you a Nazi, think again sunshine. Now fuck off from my You Tube channel idiot !

[taranbaker]

@winterstellar Another ad hominem attack like that idiot from Channel 7. What Lord Monckton says is entirely uncontroversial and is basically taken directly from the IPCC reports. Take Box 10.2 on p.798 of the 2007 Fourth Assessment Report: Delta temp(equilibrium) = 4.7±1 x ln (future CO2 concentration / 270 ppm). When you take into account that anthropogenic sources account for 3% of the total CO2 output, any impact by an individual country is completely insignificant.

[winterstellar]

@taranbaker That's why all countries must reduce the missions. By the way, neither the emissions fron the USA nor China or other big countries are totally insignifant.

[taranbaker]

@winterstellar My point is that any anthropogenic reduction in emissions will need to be massive to make any meaningful difference. Even if we shut down all economic activity we'd achieve an insignificant reduction in equilibrium global temperature at massive cost (you can live like a caveman if you want). This fact is indisputable and why no politician is willing to state how much their carbon minimisation plan will reduce temperature by because the answer is basically nothing.

[edd9139]

Lord Monckton is not a scientist. At least Dr Dennis makes it clear that he himself is not and focuses on the economics instead.

Insurance principle eitherway...