MtronSSD Lightning fast startup in 8 sec, NO LOADING BAR!

[faxmanloveswaffles]

not even the drivers or any programs r installed. THIS DOESNT COUNT!!

[GH2mainiac]

wow its only loading that fast cause well theres nothing to really load on the desktop or hardrive for that matter im guessing thats a freshly installed XP put some shit on it then lets see if the same thing happens

[Gamer031711]

he didnt paus shit he just fucking turned on his monitor at a point where he knew it was done loading

[hondaracingnet]

and where is the bios boot screen ???

fake fake fake

[222Dome222]

@hondaracingnet how about to watch it until the end?

[leefost]

dogshit monitor

[Neksotus]

@leefost Thats just bad ass...

[greenfishticks]

chinese xp lol it says its fake xD

[N2K10]

fake

[N2K10]

HE PAUSED THE CAM!! RETARD!!

[MultiYippee]

yeah ur right thats why he tried to hold the cam really straight who agrees with me

[TedPark1025]

@greenfishticks if im not mistaken, that's korean, not chinese

[greenfishticks]

@TedPark1025 oh lol

[hlnio]

@TedPark1025 I think you are right

[atxjohnnyboi]

The most impressive startup I have seen on youtube from a average home user. You can still make your current boot up in 4 seconds easy.

[zomhby]

OMG !

[13Sakke13]

You really have a modern screen lolz

[raceking007]

he would, wouldnt he, after spending almost £200 on that particular ssd

[iJomo08]

dude having to lie just to make windows look good...bad times.

[pundit96]

all of you are really stupid look at the reflection in the beggining, it playing at like 4x speed

[NxtGretzky88]

i dont see whats wrong with reflection. what am i missing?

[pundit96]

actually maybe i was wrong, sorry guys

[Yoksua]

Look closely, and you will see that the video is faster than normal... i think he put X2 or x4 speed.

[MoonCross10]

hell this is fast

[josnelihurt]

Amazing, do you imagine running Ubuntu 9.04 with Ext4?? uffff....

[55hashim55]

this is amazing men nice video 10/10

[marcvie9]

THIS IS A SPEEDUP

[derekk1220]

lol nice

[BillyMambo]

this is not boot up... this is power up from hilbernate mode

[AoDTheAnonymousPH]

Description

[purplegumibear]

You obviously did not watch the video... he clicks restart and shows the entire process...

[BillyMambo]

you are right i didnt notice. forgive my stupid comment

[atari26003]

seeing as the SSD cards can easily lose their memory wouldn't it be smart to Have this JUST boot XP and then use a secondary hard drive for apps etc?

i think its good idea!

speed + the reliability of the second HDD

:D

[failharderpl0x]

This + MicroXP = amazing

[dstefanescu]

SSD driver are damn fast .... so is the i-ram/

[Fujin005]

Actually he isn't. ;)

----

Fujin.

[fjayrockst]

sped up, you can notice this when you move your mouse for the carr

[icugigasoft]

mice move pretty fast actually. It doesn't disprove anything

[fjayrockst]

yes it does it proves the vids sped up

[ginjopowder]

there's no loading bar.. perhaps it is windows 95 - so he faking it XP. you can try it- no loading bar

[xLordJeevesx]

Spent so much on the drive, you couldn't afford an LCD.

[bf2films]

I NEED A SOLID STATE DRIVE!!!!

[m0eme]

CRT screen...so retro

[Twisted86]

Dunno CRT has better performance and picture then any LCD. Also no risk of pixels. Personally I love my CRT for gaming and my LCD for browsing the net.

[j5689]

Some people, such as myself, can't afford an LCD.

[HiddenAbilities]

@m0eme CRT pwns though for quality, maybe not color but still o.o

[mavamaarten]

wooh.

[starfoxacefox]

Lame, SSD is that fast.. You don't know what he ass under the hood. I have tested SSD in riad 0 on 6 drives 8gb each. Not even the controller can keep up..

Foxler

[thelargeorange]

u fag u installed windows and deleted evrything JACKASSS!!!

[SmokinAce0001]

i was going to say the same thing. i mean it loads nothing, so its tecnically not fast at all.

[j5689]

I third this

[1337subz3r0]

I disagree.

A few of these SSD's in raid 0 and you will expect to see sub 10 second boot times even in vista.

[latuman]

Deleted everything? Like how?

[WILLINGsss]

guys don't let this dude eat your mind. As you can see he just installed a new windows in his computer and that why the computer is loading very fast, because he doesn't have any document in his computer and any program installed.....

[rudewolf89]

anyone's computer loads windows xp if you haven't installed any programs onto it.

[rudewolf89]

loads it fast**

[latuman]

Ummmmm not that fast. I guarantee it will take, from a fresh install, about 25 seconds to fully boot up. From the flashing indicator to HDD light stop flashing.

[1337subz3r0]

I guarantee you this is real, 9 of these 16gb SSD drives in raid 0 config and your getting upwards of 1000mb/s with 0.1ms access time, making these insanely fast drives that will blow any conventional hdd out of the water.

So please do some reasearch before you post.

[latuman]

I was talking about normal hard drives, as I think rudewolf meant.

[1337subz3r0]

sure :)

[8309400]

try an iram or rocketdrive and an ssd and compare, the iram will boot xp in 4 to 6 seconds! look at this you tube clip watch?v=Q0v_49DRi30

the reason why the gigabyte iram is faster than an ssd is the random access write speed in milliseconds. write times is the speed difference between them.

[ultimatexpka]

this dosent show iram start up this is still a mtiron read the info before writing

[PoetbyDay]

this is obviously some chinese shit black market, whats with the chinese language on this stolen computer, also your not fooling anyone I can see that girl in the room with you. Also their's not a fucking thing on that damn computer so of course it's start-up is fast! your chink mother cocker!

[KyleStilkey]

It's called a Solid State Drive

[steblublu]

racist and ignorant and classless. you've hit the trifecta.

[Flophole]

How do you know it's chinese? How do you know it's a stolen PC? How do you know it's a girl in the room (and why the fuck would that make a difference)? Holy shit, wait a minute.. YOU'RE SUPERMAN! :O NO WAY

[bjwil32]

Wow, that was fast.

SSD Time... 1.2 seconds to 9 seconds.

HDD Time...3 minutes to an hour.

SSD --- 1

HD --- ZIP

[iCookie1]

Lol are you sure that's SSD and not a RAM disk of some sort? That seemed awfully fast, even for a SSD...

[Thorn2200]

SSDs kick ass

[tingokuman]

AHHHHHH IM SOO JEALOUS THATS AWESOME

[rhoxthebeast]

Looks like it would take more time for that CRT to fully light up than it does for XP to load. Nice!

How expensive are the SSD's anyway?

[BurtWilson1]

OCZ Core series is cheap.

[coresnake]

currently $300 for 64gb, im set!

[b2flsdc]

Also it doesn't matter how fast a memory you put into the iram the SATA connector is still the same speed.

[b2flsdc]

wow i have an iram and this is faster. Omg if you put these on a raid 0. Too bad the raid controller adds time to the boot up.

[pr0wnz]

clean install XD it aint hard then my hdd does the same thnx to my c2quad and 2gigs of ddr3 dominator ram...

[Wrathlon]

No it doesnt.

[Alex0856]

Wow, that is fast. Almost makes me want to buy an SSD! If only I had the money...

P.S. Looks like you need to increase your screen res. That looked to me like 800x600, and that monitor looks like it could support 1024x1280. But, I guess you were just trying to get a fast bootup. Really impressive.

[Branhower1]

Nice monitor ;) .

[uN1Qu3DZ]

Yea that's fast alright. But the person posting this is a moron because NOTHING is faster than the i-ram.

[bovlch]

supercomputers are

[uN1Qu3DZ]

True, but we're talking about regular PC hardware here. Anyone run a ramdisk on DDR2? 3500MB/sec baby! I'll post a video to prove it soon.

[b2flsdc]

on the ddr box it says DDR unbuffered non ecc ddr 400 MHz as max so i'd say try it but i think you are wasting your time.

[b2flsdc]

i meant "on the iram box" not "on the ddr box"

[uN1Qu3DZ]

You don't need a Gigabyte i-ram device to create a RAM disk. I'll make that video right now...

[b2flsdc]

Oops you said ramdisk not iram. my bad.

[b2flsdc]

But you can't install the OS on the ramdisk right? Also do you lose data on the ramdisk if you reboot?

[alphaod]

This is a SSD which is not the same as a RAM disk. The SSD is nonvolatile flash memory and does not require power to retain the data.

[uN1Qu3DZ]

You're right, you can't. When you reboot the OS normally you don't lose the data, it is written on the HDD and reloaded on the next boot, but if you reset the machine the data in the ramdisk is lost.

Agreed, SSDs are a good technology, but we need something else for truly fast speeds and high reliability, flash memory isn't the way to go.

[TheParadox2]

i disagree, the i-ram uses SATA 1.5GB/s, SSDs can use SATA 3.0GB/s you just need to raid them, so in a RAID for RAID 3 iRAM's vs 3 SSD's I'll bet the SSDs win

[fibertech9]

actually the iram can use pci express which beats all sata interfaces!

[Lisho]

It does not.. it only uses the PCI connector for power. This means when the PC is powered down, the battery on the iRAM board wont go flat.

[salimras123]

LOL. I laughed when the loading bar disappeared.

That was FAST.

[chimpy72]

I totally agree with the previous poster. The rest of you read up on SSD! Read times of 90 MB/s!! And write times even faster (!) at 109 MB/s! A standard HD just *cannot do that*.

[bvasic]

what!?! NO ordinary harddrive can boot up xp that fast. That is the power of SSD.

I have 2 150gb raptors in raid0 (one of the fastest performances drive consumer setups you can get today) And a fresh install of xp doesnt boot up that fast. All of you who are saying that they can get that time on an ordinary harddrive IS JUST BS. Stop lying

[turboisken]

that was so funny

[nloli]

who cares if its newly installed or not, this guy is just trying to show how fast it can get

[moisessteven]

cheap ass computer

[kevinjaviercruz]

jajajaja, yeah

[vangstaz]

You guys wanna know the truth to this video? This persons XP has nothing installed onto it. It's newly installed. My PC boots up way faster than this when it has nothing installed. When you have tons of stuff installed onto it, it will boot slower, and I don't like cheaters, I can tell if it's newly installed of not! lol!

[stegopainx2]

I was about to say, WOW that's fast! but then I noticed that it's a fresh install of Windows XP, and ALL of my pc's are that fast with just sata 500 GB Western Digital hard drives and fresh installs of Windows XP. It even shows the "Take a tour of XP" balloon thingy! This vid sucks!

[ecch]

lol! the newly installed xp can stand up 21 sec on my 4 years old pc too :)

[DonPatch44]

OMFG

[imrano1210]

noob shit!

it a newly installed windows..

u can see..

after logon screen..

on the desktop.

it ask TAKe a tour of windows xp.

so that mean its newly installed!

[Criblo456]

Of course they tested it with a fresh version of windows....You test the boot using a fresh OS to see the optimum boot time so you have a control to compare to other boot times. Please don't make stupid posts.

[stegopainx2]

Criblo456, uhh.. ok.. optimum boot time my ass. My friggin Athlon XP 2800+ with a SATA 150 hard drive boots just as fast. That's like showing us "LOOK HOW FAST DOS BOOTS ON MY NEW 10GHz PC!" Fresh installs of Windows... HAH. You want fast? Create a ramdisk, set up a virtual machine with a virtual hard drive on the ram disk, install the OS on it, THEN see what is fast.

[Criblo456]

I didn't say it's the fastest boot possible by any machine on earth. I said when testing boot speeds you want to get its optimum boot with a clean install to have a control to compare other machines. The more you do to try to MAKE the boot faster, the more variables you add, and any comparative tests would be skewed . He's testing the drive, nothing else.

[imrano1210]

man..

of course all new installed XP boot that fast!..

thats why i said its noob!

if i wanna prove the speed..

use a old install of XP..

only then people will be impressed..

[imrano1210]

man..

of course all new installed XP boot that fast!..

thats why i said its noob!

if i wanna prove the speed..

use a old install of XP..

only then people will be impressed..

[TheParadox2]

i don't care if it was newly installed, its fast enough for my ass.

[JohnHashCode]

blow this monitor back to hell

[TheBigBorg]

I think this is a great invention, and the lifetime is at least 5.000.000 writing cycles;). so it's an upgraded flash disc, if it works XD!

[Abercr0mbie4life]

This method of data storage pre-dates HDD. Kinda funny how we did a full circle.

[zvegasz]

capacity vs size.

[chris746568462]

And capacity vs price.

[rootbrian]

Consider this...

A SSD (Solid State Disk) is basicly a very expensive compact flash card, stuffed in the case of a 3.5" or 2.5" hard disk.

It's life cycle is limited to 300,000-330,000 write cycles... After that, it's useless. Windows XP/Vista using virtual memory will make it have a shorter life span.

Talk about sector killing & waste of money for speed :P

No offence tho, I'll stick to hard disks.

[breddin]

Some SSD disks can read and write 50gig everyday for 140years. So I'dont think that the lifespan is a problem. (don't remeber if it was mtron or samsung or maybe both). I will use a SSD for system and a normal for stroing. And ofcourse turn of the windows virtual memory function. I don't think anyone would compain over a broken SSD drive 140 years from now ;) .

with a acesstime of 0,1ms and readspead at 100+ mb/s and writespeed of 80mb/s makes them totaly kickass.

Speed=fun=happy=worth every$

[rootbrian]

Most likely, the one your talking about has a backup battery system. Those use standard, lifetime-working SD or DDR RAM sticks slotted in a 5.25" CD/DVD-ROM case. Those will outlast any computer, but the battery must'nt die or everything is lost.

[Abercr0mbie4life]

You have no idea what you are talking about, please stop making the internet dumber with your comments.

[rootbrian]

Those types might use rechargeable batteries OR have a hard disk in them to store everything before powerdown. It's basicly a Mega Cache.

Those things REALLY cost money.

[kcfckiller]

I have a mtron 7000 drive in my macbook at its awesome. Yea, lifespan is no longer an issue. And rootbrian is talking about ram drives which are totally different than ssd, it's just all together a different technology. Ram drives are actually faster than ssd, but there are a lot of problems with them, primarily physical size and data loss.

[rootbrian]

Also wear-leveling. That applies to RamDisks and SSD's (Flash memory disks).

[kcfckiller]

rootbrian, I would highly suggest that you do some research on current tech before replying. With the current generation I'd nand, wear levelling isn't really a problem anymore. And ram drives don't need wear levelling as they use ram.

[TheParadox2]

lol, the MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) for the OCZ SSDs are 1.5 Million hours.... um, thats 171 years genius.

[therock27374]

I'm always confused with this MTBF 1.5million hours. That IS 171 hours, would it mean you can have the drive doing its thing for 171 years? I mean thats what it means right?

[TheParadox2]

um, pretty much yes.

Say you had a light bulb, and average joe turns on this light 3 times a day. Using the light bulb long enough doesn't seem damage it, it's the heating up, cooling down that wears it out.

A test would be to turn on/off the light every 2 minutes until it fails... so say 1k flips is about 3 years (3x365 is about 1k).

Basically, the MTBF tries to make a drive fail. Which ever is the most critical point under NORMAL conditions. So under NORMAL conditions, its good for 171yrs

[PissedJelly]

lol the splash screen was like "h-bye"

[rayrodrigo]

woah