The Supreme Court has ruled that "income" equals profits and gains derived from capital. You cannot "derive" gain or profit from wages--an even exchange. Wages are not "income." But the courts are now so corrupt they pay no attention to previous rulings. Milking the wage earner has just become too easy. We are all slaves to the banksters and the money they create out of nothing and loan to us (and our government) at interest. What a scam!
The IRS uses devilish fraud in its wording of the documents--fooling the people into believing they have to pay taxes legally on wages. The up side is they are all going to burn in hell. The down side is, you will pay taxes on your wages, slave, or they will throw you in jail. They are the bill collectors for the PRIVATE BANKSTER outfit called the Federal Reserve. I say pay your extortion money if you work--I don't want anyone to go to jail.
"Income" was never meant to cover a person's wages. A person's wages is even exchange. There is no PROFIT when you trade an hour of your life for an hour's wages. In fact, you lose money as it costs money to work. Wages were a means to obtain capital so one could invest it and thereby make a GAIN--then pay taxes. The whole system has been turned on its head. Watch Aaron Russo's "Freedom to Fascism." That being said, they will put you in jail. Extortion and racketeering. Welcome to USA.
Danny. I know you will likely never see this, but I am your Nephew's best friend, and I want to let you know that you are a hero. A true patriot. 36 years is a long time, but you should be proud that your actions have inspired me to continue the fight in your honor.
LOL. Wrong. Explain how the IRS Code is relevant to a Direct or Indirect tax? You cannot do that can you? You must show that it is one or the other, or it is Unconstitutional. LOL IRS tax code law.. LOL!
Hmm..another idiot who thinks "code is not law". Okay...
code(n): 1.a body of laws, as of a nation or city, organized for easy reference.
Your question is meaningless (and misleading) . You're asking me if Title 26 deals with capitations and non-apportioned taxes - which the Brushaber decision flatly rejected.
You do not understand the meaning of either, or their application. No wonder you are confused. You state to uphold the Constitution, yet you admit the income tax meets neither requirement mandated by the Constitution (LAW). Yet you still say that the 16th ammendment is legal and overrides the Constitution. You are insane in your contradiciton. You are saying you are again Right and Wrong at the same time. That is INSANE!
No, it's just insane when you don't understand what you're dealing with.
If you're saying the 16th wasn't ratified, then neither were the first 15. The 16th removed the apportionment clause to taxation - it didn't grant any more power to Congress to tax than they already had.
Life's hard when you're purposely ignorant. Go back and read the Constitution again, specifically Article I, Section 8.
Are you saying that all those "first 15" ammendments were ratified at the same time? LOL you don't understand "Article I, Section 8"
Congress cannot give their power to coin and regulate "money" away! They can only excersize it. Congress does not regulate our money system. The (not)Federal Reserve does.
You contadict your own statements.. You support the Constitution yet at the same time support Congress giving their responsibility/power away. What is up with that?
Hitler had the courts and alot of guns ("victory" as you say) on his side. You would of supported him also. No question about it.
Nice contradictions, you are a master at them. I do not need to prove Congress outsourced their fiscal responsibilities. It's simply reality. Also they don't do much that is in a formal manner so you again are an idiot.
It's an illegal income tax. No questions about it.
William, you would of been a bad German and a great Nazi. Just as you are here, and for your information. Dead people can't shoot guns.
You respond to intelligent debate with immature insults. Something children that are confused and do not know how to socially interact with other human beings do. A result of your military training? I think so, along with your upbringing by Television and Public Schooling.
I don't expect you to change. You have done a great job of a making an ass of yourself for eveyrone here. That was my intent, to show what an idiot you are without any doubt remaining.
Hah! your just pissed that you've been brainwashed into paying taxes just as your parents and grandparents. And you have no ability to change your own way of thinking! Wake up fool! The only reason this so called "tax law" exists is because the masses perpetuate this repetitive behaviour out of developed fear
chapter 1 does show tax liability, for several taxes as you said "Determination of Tax Liability" Then you showed the IMPOSITION of a tax on taxable income, remember a tax must be imposed on something, then SOMEONE has to be made liable for it. Where is the liability clause for income tax? you have shown a deceitful attempt to hide the truth that there is no law making anyone Liable for the income tax, i can't believe your mind can not figure that out, but i know your soul knows the truth.
I suggest everybody watch two videos on google video: "Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception" and "Magnificent Deception". Learn how they deceive you in these defacto courts. Ed Brown is a true patriot, if you don't support him they will be knocking on your door next, for what ever reason they make up. Stop funding these tyrants and fight for freedom, stop paying illegal taxes NOW. Don't expect freedom from this regime, take it.
Listen to infowars updates on Ed Brown through streaming audio on the web for free. Download winamp and look for the shoutcast radio group, then go to the talk section. There are constant refeeds of the day's show. Support Alex and Ed!!
By the way, EVERY American adult should see Aaron Russos' astounding documentary, "Freedom to Fascism". Then check out "Terror Storm" by Alex Jones! Your lives will never be the same again, especially when you find out how easy it is to confirm the facts via countless reputable sources! WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!!!
Right on Dan! I think you just spoke for MILLIONS of law abiding American citizens who are sick and tired of being hoodwinked and extorted. Perhaps a You Tube revolution of solid evidence and overwhelming support for the Browns' would be a great place to start! These are truly some good, law abiding American Citizens. I've talked with Ed via email and he couldn't be any more genuine or modest. God bless them and all of their supporters!
I am so happy that their people out there supporting Ed and Elaine Brown, it gives me hope for them as well as my husband and I. We are also having a bad time with the IRS. However, so far, not as bad a time as the Brown's are having. They are good people and they are correct in saying there is no law that makes us required to pay income taxes on our labor.
The Supreme Court has ruled that "income" equals profits and gains derived from capital. You cannot "derive" gain or profit from wages--an even exchange. Wages are not "income." But the courts are now so corrupt they pay no attention to previous rulings. Milking the wage earner has just become too easy. We are all slaves to the banksters and the money they create out of nothing and loan to us (and our government) at interest. What a scam!
MrHalified 1 week ago
The IRS uses devilish fraud in its wording of the documents--fooling the people into believing they have to pay taxes legally on wages. The up side is they are all going to burn in hell. The down side is, you will pay taxes on your wages, slave, or they will throw you in jail. They are the bill collectors for the PRIVATE BANKSTER outfit called the Federal Reserve. I say pay your extortion money if you work--I don't want anyone to go to jail.
MrHalified 1 week ago
"Income" was never meant to cover a person's wages. A person's wages is even exchange. There is no PROFIT when you trade an hour of your life for an hour's wages. In fact, you lose money as it costs money to work. Wages were a means to obtain capital so one could invest it and thereby make a GAIN--then pay taxes. The whole system has been turned on its head. Watch Aaron Russo's "Freedom to Fascism." That being said, they will put you in jail. Extortion and racketeering. Welcome to USA.
MrHalified 1 week ago
Can't have the sheeple learning the truth can we now?
MrHalified 1 week ago
have Ed and Elaine been detained?
SK3Nives 2 years ago
Danny. I know you will likely never see this, but I am your Nephew's best friend, and I want to let you know that you are a hero. A true patriot. 36 years is a long time, but you should be proud that your actions have inspired me to continue the fight in your honor.
OktoberForceAirsoft 2 years ago
Danny's an extremely motivated and capable patriot. Something tells me, he'll be out of prison before long.
Mojopokey 3 years ago
After having been convicted on federal weapons charges?!? God you're thick.
bosunbilly 3 years ago
I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but you're a fucken douche bag!
Mojopokey 2 years ago
Let me spell this out for you:
He's doing federal time to the tune of 36 years. That means he's going to do...
...36 years.
There is no parole in the federal system.
This is a life sentence for Danny as it is unlikely he's going to live long enough to see his release.
bosunbilly 2 years ago
He's going to die of old age before he gets out of prison.
36 years is a long time, and in the federal system, he has to do 34 years before he's eligible for early release.
bosunbilly 2 years ago
Prison is full of geniuses like you, Danny.
bosunbilly 4 years ago
You are correct for once. Our prisons are full of good smart people like Danny.
You sir, remind me of the movie Idiocracy.
P.S. I'm still waiting for you to show us the law that makes us liable for the "Voluntary Income Tax" LOL!
AngryHateMusic 2 years ago
Title 26 USC.
What was so hard about that question?
bosunbilly 2 years ago
LOL. Wrong. Explain how the IRS Code is relevant to a Direct or Indirect tax? You cannot do that can you? You must show that it is one or the other, or it is Unconstitutional. LOL IRS tax code law.. LOL!
AngryHateMusic 2 years ago
Hmm..another idiot who thinks "code is not law". Okay...
code(n): 1.a body of laws, as of a nation or city, organized for easy reference.
Your question is meaningless (and misleading) . You're asking me if Title 26 deals with capitations and non-apportioned taxes - which the Brushaber decision flatly rejected.
Our income tax system is neither.
Someone is wrong between us - and it's not me.
bosunbilly 2 years ago
You do not understand the meaning of either, or their application. No wonder you are confused. You state to uphold the Constitution, yet you admit the income tax meets neither requirement mandated by the Constitution (LAW). Yet you still say that the 16th ammendment is legal and overrides the Constitution. You are insane in your contradiciton. You are saying you are again Right and Wrong at the same time. That is INSANE!
AngryHateMusic 2 years ago
No, it's just insane when you don't understand what you're dealing with.
If you're saying the 16th wasn't ratified, then neither were the first 15. The 16th removed the apportionment clause to taxation - it didn't grant any more power to Congress to tax than they already had.
Life's hard when you're purposely ignorant. Go back and read the Constitution again, specifically Article I, Section 8.
bosunbilly 2 years ago
Are you saying that all those "first 15" ammendments were ratified at the same time? LOL you don't understand "Article I, Section 8"
Congress cannot give their power to coin and regulate "money" away! They can only excersize it. Congress does not regulate our money system. The (not)Federal Reserve does.
AngryHateMusic 2 years ago
No, and you know I didn't.
Look, if you want to play assclown games and pretend your a sovrun, that's fine - I've explained to you what the law is.
Do what you want from here on out - just accept the consequences of whatever happens to you.
bosunbilly 2 years ago
"If you're saying the 16th wasn't ratified, then neither were the first 15."
What did you mean by that then? It's ridiculous as is your argument all along.
AngryHateMusic 2 years ago
It means that the mechanism by which the 16th was ratified was also the same mechanism by which the first 15 were ratified.
bosunbilly 2 years ago
You really need to study history. Search "Federal Reserve" here at YouTube and watch what you find.
AngryHateMusic 2 years ago
A bunch of tin-foil hat, historically inaccurate half-assed videos by people like Aaron Russo who don't know what the fuck they're talking about.
I'll break it down for you like this:
Number of courts who agree with you = none of them.
Number of courts who agree with me = all of them.
Number of victories the sovrun/tax protestor movement have gotten = none.
I think that speaks volumes.
bosunbilly 2 years ago
You remain completely uneducated about history. Completely...
AngryHateMusic 2 years ago
Says the guy who knows little or nothing himself.
bosunbilly 2 years ago
You contadict your own statements.. You support the Constitution yet at the same time support Congress giving their responsibility/power away. What is up with that?
Hitler had the courts and alot of guns ("victory" as you say) on his side. You would of supported him also. No question about it.
AngryHateMusic 2 years ago
You haven't proved that Congress abdicated their responsibilities.
Only thing I hear from you is a lot of whining about an income tax you don't like.
Ahh yes, the old "good German" argument.
Dead Germans also shot at Panzers - what's your point?
bosunbilly 2 years ago
Nice contradictions, you are a master at them. I do not need to prove Congress outsourced their fiscal responsibilities. It's simply reality. Also they don't do much that is in a formal manner so you again are an idiot.
It's an illegal income tax. No questions about it.
William, you would of been a bad German and a great Nazi. Just as you are here, and for your information. Dead people can't shoot guns.
AngryHateMusic 2 years ago
"I do not need to prove"
Yup, that's about the most honest statement you've made since this conversation began.
"I do not need to prove "
Just make shit up when you can't offer any tangible evidence to support your claims.
You're a good tax protestor, alright.
bosunbilly 2 years ago
You respond to intelligent debate with immature insults. Something children that are confused and do not know how to socially interact with other human beings do. A result of your military training? I think so, along with your upbringing by Television and Public Schooling.
I don't expect you to change. You have done a great job of a making an ass of yourself for eveyrone here. That was my intent, to show what an idiot you are without any doubt remaining.
Thanks. You have helped our cause.
AngryHateMusic 2 years ago
Yeah, right. I'm sure your sovrun buddy Roeder said the same thing.
Shoot any doctors lately?
bosunbilly 2 years ago
Hah! your just pissed that you've been brainwashed into paying taxes just as your parents and grandparents. And you have no ability to change your own way of thinking! Wake up fool! The only reason this so called "tax law" exists is because the masses perpetuate this repetitive behaviour out of developed fear
sickasso72 2 years ago
chapter 1 does show tax liability, for several taxes as you said "Determination of Tax Liability" Then you showed the IMPOSITION of a tax on taxable income, remember a tax must be imposed on something, then SOMEONE has to be made liable for it. Where is the liability clause for income tax? you have shown a deceitful attempt to hide the truth that there is no law making anyone Liable for the income tax, i can't believe your mind can not figure that out, but i know your soul knows the truth.
dnrly 4 years ago
nice! you ought to try educating yourself on this issue before you go calling people names over something you have shown that you know nothing about.
dnrly 4 years ago
Well said Dan!
Everyone, Support Ron Paul for president, he wants to abolish the IRS, the Federal Reserve and restore the integrity of the monetary system.
BeerBottleSlide 4 years ago
I suggest everybody watch two videos on google video: "Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception" and "Magnificent Deception". Learn how they deceive you in these defacto courts. Ed Brown is a true patriot, if you don't support him they will be knocking on your door next, for what ever reason they make up. Stop funding these tyrants and fight for freedom, stop paying illegal taxes NOW. Don't expect freedom from this regime, take it.
drkaos0909 4 years ago
ONE DAY WE'LL ALL STAND UP AND FIGHT THE New World Order
JTjohn00792 4 years ago
I just read an article about you... I apologize for my earlier comment.
Souljoro 4 years ago
So where are you going to be when the storm troopers blow this guy back to the stoneage? Will you support him then?
Souljoro 4 years ago
infowars dotcom
Listen to infowars updates on Ed Brown through streaming audio on the web for free. Download winamp and look for the shoutcast radio group, then go to the talk section. There are constant refeeds of the day's show. Support Alex and Ed!!
johninfl 4 years ago
HELL YA ALEX JONES
JTjohn00792 4 years ago
I am Jared Parsley,and I will not pay income taxes from now on.Thanks Ed Brown.
Come get some!
Thrashed07 4 years ago
Another AMERICAN here who supports the Browns!! Its time that everyone wakes up!! God Bless the Browns!!
okie44t 4 years ago
By the way, EVERY American adult should see Aaron Russos' astounding documentary, "Freedom to Fascism". Then check out "Terror Storm" by Alex Jones! Your lives will never be the same again, especially when you find out how easy it is to confirm the facts via countless reputable sources! WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!!!
Phonehed 5 years ago
Right on Dan! I think you just spoke for MILLIONS of law abiding American citizens who are sick and tired of being hoodwinked and extorted. Perhaps a You Tube revolution of solid evidence and overwhelming support for the Browns' would be a great place to start! These are truly some good, law abiding American Citizens. I've talked with Ed via email and he couldn't be any more genuine or modest. God bless them and all of their supporters!
Phonehed 5 years ago
I am so happy that their people out there supporting Ed and Elaine Brown, it gives me hope for them as well as my husband and I. We are also having a bad time with the IRS. However, so far, not as bad a time as the Brown's are having. They are good people and they are correct in saying there is no law that makes us required to pay income taxes on our labor.
dianeandray 5 years ago