Maybe thta explains why they r looking for all the lunar rocks lol because today we can tell if something is fact or fiction thru DNA. I am suspect on everything now these days. I don't believe to much anymore that comes out of NASA or DC.
I am open-minded about this issue but I give the video a bit more cred because of the fact that the top two negative comments come from people whose CHANNEL M.O. looks a bit.. well.. "questionable" (go, look, check 4 urself). People without a firm identity or presence either have something to HIDE or ??? ..anyway, I am a skeptic of all but never close my mind to any possibility.. PEACE! ~a~
The greatest boast of the species is the event in human history most associated with pride in our landing accomplishment on the moon.
Twenty years later and years behind schedule the same space program couldn't put into earth orbit a telescope with a lens with focus but yet two decades earlier a mission one hundred times more complicated worked on its first occasion
@beecoz3001 And two years after the gov allegedly covered up 10,000+ technicians and scientists spread out over the country, they all of a sudden couldnt even cover up 6 losers breaking into a hotel room.
The"hoax" is retarded, and so is anyone who believes it.
(BTW, Hubble was a subcontractor error, not a NASA error. Get your facts straight)
@SpreadingtheMuse IN TWO YEARS, WE WILL KNOW ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WHETHER OR NOT NASA SENT MEN TO THE MOON. AS JAPAN PREPARES TO LAUNCH A LUNAR SATELLITE WHICH WILL BE ABLE TO SHOOT CLOSER THE PICTURES - SHOULD BE ABLE TO REST THE CASE ONCE AND FOR ALL. IF THERE ARE SHUTTLE BASES AND FLAGS, THEN WE CAN ALL CONGRATULATE NASA
Right now, nobody has a telescope good enough to see close-enough ..yet NASA has 'telescopes' such as "Hubble" which can see for billions of light years .seems a bit strange??
@beecoz3001 Japan ALREADY launched a LRO satellite. They ALREADY took pictures. Japan ALEADY said "Lookie it was real." If you cant keep up with rudimentary current events, you'll only get laughed at ;)
"seems strange" Nope. Cause you're a physics retard ;) Its the Hubble TELESCOPE, not the Hubble Microscope. Telescopes are built to focus on LARGE objects trillions of miles away. You cant ask it to work within 1/100000000th of what it was built for only to say "strange" like a newb ;)
@SpreadingtheMuse Oh did they, oh yes and the big hype they promised with how well they will be able to see for sure IF man landed WAS NOT CONFIRMED = "as the images were blurred" LMFAO! If NASA can't even take a decent pic how the hell did they even land anyone on the moon? After comparing the image with it's 25km counterpart, it has become apparent that - despite all the hype - the newer 25km images are in fact no sharper than the earlier 50km images
@beecoz3001 As I predicted, every single last dumb point you tried was due to your own ignorance. You didnt know about telescopes, didnt know about Japan's LRO, didnt know about air pressure, didnt know about frictionless flags etc etc etc. You're the perfect poster boy for the hoax, a GED drop-out with shit for experience who then naively wonders why everything goes over your head. I wonder why...
;)
Next time, dont use dumb talking points that were proven stupid 20 years ago
@SpreadingtheMuse You asked for facts and I give you plenty, you give one LAME answer.
For a so called "Former Instructor of Physical Science and Mathematics, I am now a Health Physics Radiological Control " I say this BIGOT BOY YOU ARE ONE DUMB MISLED TWAT or are we secretly working for someone else? "SHILL"
@SpreadingtheMuse Check out " WhiteJarrah" on you tube BIGOTBOY he will blow everything you mentioned into a thousand pieces. The most overwhelming anomalies to be found in the LRO photographs are the Apollo 15 rover tracks. Although appearing so prominent in the area surrounding the alleged lunar module, the trails from station to station are a different story. They gradually start to fade before disappearing altogether, as though the Photoshop editor drawing them in never finished his work.
@beecoz3001 Jarrah is a lunatic He thinks Shuttle Challenger was a deliberate assassination of Christa MacCliffe. He's the worst of the fear-mongering paranoids and by bringing him up, you just admitted to being every bit the dumbass he is ;)
I've debated jarrah plenty you newb. I've heard it all before. He skips facts and makes stuff up as he goes. You were moronic to think I've never heard of him. And you're retarded to believe him.
@SpreadingtheMuse 1. 1) Under the right circumstances it is possible to photograph the brightest stars with a daylight exposure setting.A Better way to do it is to set the camera up on a tripod and take longer exposures, there is no reason why this could not have been done on Apollo. And the astronauts would indeed have been able to actually see the stars from the moon. Michael Melvil saw them whilst in suborbit on the earth's daylight side. The earth is about five times as bright as the moon.
NUFFF SAID " SHILL " I understand about people like you fighting your masters in the sense of the NWO I have no more time for your completely LAME ASS GOVERNMENT SHILL SHIT!!
UNDERSTAND SHILL that you are NOTHING to these people, I bet you already have the RFID chip!! Keep spreading you intelligent BULLSHIT to the SHEEPLE " I was briefly a Hollywood Effects Artist " = "classic" you really can't make it up!
HOLLYWOOD the land of DECEPTION = GAME OVER BIGOTBOY :):):):)
@beecoz3001 With that eloquent response of crocodile tears, I accept your total surrender on every point ;)
You mean being a gullible conspirasheep did NOT prepare you to argue science with someone who actually works in it for a living? NAH!! You dont say. ;)
A pity you turned into a crybaby so quickly. You posted dumb "evidence" and got stomped like a tard. Cry to jarrah and he'll pat you on the head like a good widdle boy ;)
@beecoz3001 And you bet your ass I was a Hollywood artist. Hell of a time too and I'm damn proud of it. Thats called "Getting out and having a life instead of whining about hoaxes in your parents basement." Dont worry, some day you'll move out of your parents and you can be a big boy. When you're about 45 ;)
@beecoz3001 Your "questions" are all infamous as the first talking points any newb cut and pastes from a dork webpage. We've seen them all before from other newbs who werent dumb enough to post them expecting a gold medal, as you were dumb enough to ;)
@SpreadingtheMuse 2) The Apollo 15 flag waved when David Scott ran past it. The ALSJ ruled the footprint vibrations theory as doubtful. They concluded that Scott bumped it with his elbow, but analysis of the footage shows the initial movement began before he ran past it. This suggests he pushed air into the flag as he came near it.
2) "ran past it" Uh huh. Once you pass 9th grade physics, thats called "vibrational footsteps." Duh.
"Doubtful" So says the hoax spaz ;) I TEACH physics dumbass. I require the opinion of no one, especially a newb hoaxtard. The flag moved via vibration.
@SpreadingtheMuse 3) Wernher von Braun in 1953 anticipated that there would be a huge blast crater beneath his proposed moonship with an exit exhaust pressure of only 0.15psi. Apollo had an exit pressure of 1.3psi.
I could go n on but all this time teaching a misled child like yourself is costing me time I do not have.No wonder I don't see you on Jarrah videos is Bee Coz he will shred your flimsy ass to pieces TARD!!
@beecoz3001 3) Since when does "anticipated" = "proven?" 1953? WTF? Before we had landed a single probe there? Taken a single pic? Before we knew ANYTHING about the surface? You barf out a flying guess and naively wonder why it didnt work out? WTF stupidity is that? ;)
@beecoz3001 For your information we are already able to see small items on the lunar surface. Including some of the left-overs from the landings. Moon Buggy included.
"no dust on footpads" Why would there be? "Settling" and "Floating" only happen in air. No air = no air pressure = no floating = no dust settling on footpads. You've never even seen the footage have you? All dust is thrown in parabolic frictionless arcs. Impossible in any atmosphere. Its a vacuum.
I'm sorry, was of that supposed to be hard? ;)
Those were predictable cut and pastes from the first dork site you found. They've been laughed at for years.
@SpreadingtheMuse And despite LRO being only 25km above the lunar surface, the earth-orbiting GeoEye-1 still takes better pictures of Apollo-sized objects from nearly 700km away. This ultimately calls into question the whole point of dipping into the lower altitude, assuming the LRO even dipped into this lower altitude at all FACT! (WATCH "MoonFaker: LRO at 25km?" and " MoonFaker: LRO, Silhouettes At 25km
Virgil [Gus] Grissom - astronaut - outspoken critic of the apollo missions, died along with 2 others, in Apoolo 1's fire on Jan 21st 1967 when a full-scale simulation burst into flames with the 3 astronauts sealed inside. Gus' family still believe he was intentionally silenced and say NASA know who was responsible
Thomas Ronald Baron was due to submit a 500 page report on findings that NASA would never get to moon !!
@SpreadingtheMuse Baron, his wife and step-daughter, died when their car was struck by a train
Report vanished
1964 -1967 a total of 10 astronauts met with untimely deaths
15% of NASA's Astronaut core were killed in freak accidentsAs this was before the supposed landing, it must have been about removing them from the contest as they were not of a certain disposition - they had an avertion to lies perhaps? - they couldn't be bought?
WATCH " 1969 WE DID NOT LAND ON THE MOON" Mr MISLED LoooL
@beecoz3001 Why is every death always "untimely" or "mysterious?" I wont buy biased assumptions where everything is always a "freak accident." Its just making up your story as you go. Aldrin could die in his sleep tomorrow and you'd still scream "CIA SNIPER!" Its retarded.
Yes. Where are the "we went to the moon" people on this video? They probably ran off to watch that Mythbusters episode they love so much to try to come up with some new arguments.
@NasaFakedItAll It's impossible to reason with you hoaxers, so most people probably don't even care.
But the fact is that this moon footage has been scrutinized many times by all kinds of scientists for all kinds of sources (yes, some of them were independent as well) - and if this was in any way faked then that would be an official truth LONG ago.
Do you see any serious physicist or physics teacher deny the moon landings?
When you see the astronauts covered from head to foot in dust then see the PERFECT photos they took....where was the dust on the camera lens?....how can you wipe clean a lens with a dusty glove and also you cannot see what you are cleaning as its on your chest...try it at home on your own camera cover with dust and point it away from you and clean it...try it oh and stick a goldfish bowl on your head at the same time
Anyone heard of the Glast Burst Monitor? This satellite monitors gamma radiation in space. The energy readings are so high that they register in 100 MeV's and over. During a solar flare, the readings are incredible. The power of the sun and all that radiation flowing through space will kill you quickly. NASA knew this which is why they had to fake the missions. Anyone trying to reach the moon would be dead long before they got there without proper shielding or electromagnetic shields.
@Daddyo930 Awesome point Daddy, I am going to check that out. The Nasa Cheerleaders always say stuff like, "Well the radiation was not that bad, (and) the specks of dust that could have punctured the suits and craft were just not that prevelent when they went." It is such horse shit, when you add all those little things us that they squeeked out you see it was impossible, its all just a string of well thought out lies.
@MrTommYYZ There is also the SOLRAD and CERRES satellite data you can use. There is an article called "Deadly Radiation At and Past the Van Allen Shields". You can also mention the fact that during apollo 12, 10 major solar flares were reported. No one can survive even one of those let alone 10. Some of those solar flares were solar proton events (extreme levels of radiation). Thank you for having an open mind.
@rimmyou69 There is no reason for them to return to the moon, because they have been there six times already - in fact they are preparing for a journey to Mars right now, and that's much more interestin from a publicistic perspective.
But they also have plans on making a moon base in the near future.
@MrTommYYZ ...You frauds go around all day claiming the government and media control the truth and call people who don't agree with "sheep". When the tables get turned what happens? You act like a 5 year old. I knew you were a fake with nothing to say, you just proved it.
Since you decided to step to me (perhaps you were ordered to?), why don't you atleast comment on the information I have presented? No? Don't want to do that? I would not want to either.
@MrTommYYZ ...It got quiet because all the hoax belivers left in shame after the HD LRO photo s came out. Only a few silly boys like you are still around talking to yourself ;)
@teddysalad65 Mmm, no. Its guys like you that are still around, not talking about the points. Just slinging insults and walking away. You are the coward and the fool. I love how you do not talk about ANYTHING, just insult. Can't you see what you are doing? You are the one who is the follower, doing what you have been programmed to do. Scared Coward Child.
@teddysalad65 Ha ha, that is awesome, thank you for degrading yourself for everyone, I just wanted to keep it between you and me but if you want to share. Well are you going to answer my question for everyone? Yeah, that is me, I am slinging an insult and stepping to your coward ass, fuck tard. So now I guess you have two unanswered questions to answer.
@teddysalad65 I am not going anywhere you coward fuck tard, I know you want me to go because you are shitting your pants right now.....but, HOW exactly did you prove that I was a fake? by calling you out as a fucking scared little boy fuck tard? My mission was accomplished with that one. What exactly is fake about distrust of the govt? Why wont you even attempt to disput what I have said? Because you got nothing, nothing you scared little boy.
Ok now here is a great way to separate yourself from the rest of the NASA cheerleaders. You had asked me to back up what I have said, I have done so. Now think clearly before you address this.
For those who are interested, Dave Mcgowan's series, Wagging The Moon Doggie, on his website, A Center For An Informed America. Great series. Before I read this I was a believer in the moon landings.
@MrTommYYZ ...>"Dave Mcgowan's series, Wagging The Moon Doggie, on his website, A Center For An Informed America. Great series. Before I read this I was a believer in the moon landings.<'
-------
You let Dave McGowan flip you over like a 10$ hooker? Lol, I bet even Dave McGowan is laughing at how easy you are. McGowan was doing an experiment to see how gullible people are and how easily manipulated they can be. You fell for it like a little lamb ;)
I love how the video starts with a lie, that is is the internet that makes a moon hoax case. There were probably more AMericans then that knew it was a lie in the 60s than there are now. Shit, go to germany, ask 9 out of 10 people and they will say ofcourse we faked it. The reason the lie is able to live so strongly is because we are sheep in the USA.
@MrTommYYZ The number of Germans believing in a hoax is a figure you have made out. Polls in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and the Benelux countries have shown, that only 5 to 8 percent believe in the fake-theory. Now it would be interesting to know, who is the real liar ;)
@CHSarahBs I will answer that question by giving you a different example but with the same govt process. Would you be suprised to believe that the majority, over 90% of the people in Pakastan, Iraq, afganistan and the region believe Osama Bin Laden to have been CIA? Suprised that Alquida is seen as a CIA front? You should be, because you will never hear that opinion on OUR media, though it is common knowledge in that part of the country, and that is true, the CIA has orchestrated all of it.
@MrTommYYZ So Sarah, I will ask you to do this. When you want to show proof of something, do not go to what has been presented for you, go to the source. That number I gave is right online with the number of Germans I have spoken to PERSONALLY. I believe you will have the same experience. When discussing such large topics, know that there is govt interest in how those conversations go. Know that the govt does not believe in free enterprise, they have fingers in all media pies.
@CHSarahBs Ha ha, well this is how they are able to fool you so well. Now I do not believe you are a fool, just fooled. Because you talk to a few Americans who believe what they have been programed to believe does not make it true. You asked for an example, here is a watered down one, but search for video: "Good Morning America learns that Bin Laden is CIA "
@MrTommYYZ ...you've been leaving a lot of comments here lately. How much do you get paid to leave comments? I know the Chinese and Russian governments pay people like you spread disinformation. I also heard Dave McGowan pays people to mention his book on these channels. You must be making a lot of money doing this. You haven't presented any information about how the Moon landings could have been hoaxed and I don't care what % of the populations believes its a hoax. That's not an argument.
@teddysalad65 Ha ha, Nee How Comrade!!! You heard a lot about Mcgowan huh? What a crock, and what a loser you are. If you have been reading my posts than you will see how I explain how the major world govts are in colusion. If ANYONE is paying people to post it is the US govt, and if ANYONE is getting paid by them it is you. WHat you are doing is text book bait and switch, insult the person and do not address any information, and claim the person has provided no info when they clearly have.
Even though I'm sure they hide away in USA,I have send an email to the European parliament asking to make a decision not to allow entrance in Europe to the Apollo so called "astronauts" for the deception and fraud they commit against humanity.Anyone who agree with this ,please send your emails at will.Let's take some action against these criminals.
With my limited science education I've shot you down in flames without getting very far into the video, so any further argument is futile. Until you can at least get a little science education you should quit with the Hoax nonsense.
Limited computing power? Man was put on the moon with a slide rule. The same thing makes a slide rule work as makes a computer work... logarithms. So you see, a slide rule is a manual computer. The measurements they used to fire the engines for orbital burns were astronomical. Like navigating a ship across the ocean using the stars. Pretty accurate.
If the mountains in the distance were quite a distance away you could move a few hundred yards either direction and the LEM would be out of view, but the perspective of the mountians would remain essentially unchanged...looking as though the module was in one picture but not in the other... IDIOTS... FAIL!
Sunlight from the left side at that low angle would not light all of the way to the horizon. The curvature of the moon would lessen the reflection intensity...OPTICS 101... and also at a much more rapid rate since the moon's curvature is sharper than earth's which is our normal point of reference. FAIL
@MrMic1146 I've seen proof for both sides of this issue, there is a video that seems to show 'faking' but idk. That video may have been edited to look like hoaxing. If it were shown to be real, then it'd be a 'smoking gun' in this arguement. But i haven't seen it shown to be such. I do think we landed on the moon, but people have fair questions. And as for the last part of your comment, belief in God is more rational than a physics defying explosion
The American NAzA astronaut in the 60s and scientific adviser of the Apollo program O' Leary in a 2002 interview stated : " Regarding the Apollo missions I'm not sure these men walked on the Moon,it's possible that NAzA had cover it up"...And I don't think any the fucking trolls here (Windley ,Plait etc) knows any better than Mr O' Leary. watch?v=lOyYZIW0zvY
It never fails to amaze me how many people just can't accept things the way they are. Always trying to see conspiracies around every corner. I suppose you are the same people that think Elvis is still alive. For Christ sake, grow up and drag yourselves into the 21st century.
From what this fucking allan bean clown says ,it seems the "astronauts" never had any instruments to measure the radiation levels going to the"moon" . Great.! Next time they tell us they went to the Moon on horses.
As far as I am concerned, the preponderance of evidence, which in many circumstances has been proven factual, man did land on the moon. Not even taking into account that I personally sat at home as a young boy and watched nearly all the news coverage, every one of the questions you people that cannot seem to pull your head out of your dumb asses that say it was faked has been answered. It was not faked, the moon landings were real. Grow up and accept the facts. anyone that does not, IDIOT.
@bushhunter90001 Go hunter the truth, you sat at home and watched a film. They may have gone to the moon but should we not ask questions or do we accept the moon is flat..
Hmmm, there was a lot of stuff about the 'hoax' moon landing a few years ago and I then thought the evidence for or against was inconclusive- however it now seems to be without a doubt that the Americans were working together with the Russians to produce this elaborate hoax. In so many areas things just aren't what they seem to be... get used to it....
@Modonaut57 It now seems? I am wondering about this term, if you are referring to the questions of this video here. They are totally answered and this for years and decades. Sorry, but there is no shred of evidence for a hoax.
@fanbutton I do not want to offend you, but maybe those indescrepancies are only things, you do not understand. All those evidences has been debunked several times for 40 years now. And this only with a bit of logic and understanding of basic science.
@CHSarahBs Sorry if you took my comment lightly. I should of said that after thoroughly researching all of the available evidence and scientific facts based on the laws of physics, I have come to the conclusion that there are simply too many descrepancies in the whole manned moon landing story. As far as they being "all debunked", well that's a matter of opinion. You are certainly welcome to yours.
@fanbutton I do not think, that this is a matter of opinions. This is only a matter of facts based on science. I would be glad to know, which points you see as discrepancies.
several of those have been debunked by mythbusters, but more to the point if Apollo never left near earth orbit how do you explain the utter silence from the Soviet Union and other nations that would have been able to track the craft and see that it never left earth orbit? The USSR would have had a nice presentation on the floor of the UN long before Apollo 11 ever returned.
or maybe they keep quiet to honor the memory of JFK?
or because of Hunchbacked USSR/US 'reach around' theory?
I live conspiracy theorist… I truly do, any and all evidence anything that suggest they might be wrong is 'propaganda' and clearly wrong.
the LRO takes pics and those are lies, the next generation cameras that will be able to read the USA plaque and show all 50 stars on the flags are all lies and trickery. even if it is a Japanese or Chinese craft.
God or Aliens could come and say it happened and even transport you to the moon to see it and you would still not believe.
@TheZachish LRO took pics of some small dots that always has been there. Amazing that after 40 years no one has ever been taking pics of the hardware supposly left there by NASA, lmao
@TheZachish Who mentioned that?! with taking pics of hardware, i meant REAL closeup pics from moons surface, not some crappy orbit pics thats nothing else than small dots who has always been there. Why not send up a rocket and a lander with a RC car, and simply locate i.e Apollo 11 landing site? it would be extremely easy today, Lunochods was radio controlled and thats 40 years ago! with todays standard it wont be any problem at all!
@xismxist So these small dots had landing pads on them an cast a square shadow did they? what would be the point in sending a space ship to the moon to take pictures of the landing sites? all you odd balls would say is they are faked anyway so no point.
if you add texture to a surface shadows don't flow the same way.... the reason the astronaut is not shadowed by the lander is because the lunar surface itself reflects light ... hence the brightness to his spacesuit
@wizardman42 No, it would not. Take the LRO images. They show all the equipment and the LMs left on the lunar surface. But this is no evidence for the hoax believers. They prefer to say, LRO is faked, too.
of course the LRO pictures are faked: the shadows of the landers don't even correspond with the landers themselves; furthermore there are several landers, and they are always near a hole.
@hunchbacked you will never hear a doctor talk bad of another even if a doctor kills patients right and left. that would not be professinal.Expert, scientific, whatever
@TheJomogogo I'm disappointed with your ignorance, that's a fact. First of all, I never said the moonlandings were faked, but the true is that there isn't one single solid proof that we have been there. Can you deny it? The problem is that you think that everyone with scientific knowledge believe we've been on the moon and that's not true - just face it.
i kinda have a problem with the temperatures on the moon and it's effect on 120 roll film which the hasselblad cameras used. i've been out in snow and the films fogged, not radiation just snow. i don't accept that this film would have survived the extreme conditions at all. AND why havent they gone back to pick up all the trash they left there?
i have no clue about physics but the fact there was an engine noise and the noise was focused on the astronauts as for the waving flag the fabric of the flag has a wire mesh sewn into it. The flag rolls up into a nice little package. When on the Moon, the astronauts extend the pole and stick it into the ground. They can then unroll the flag causing it to move.
i belive it was real parts were faked like the pictures but that dosnt mean we didnt go to the moon but anyway
gefalschte Mondlandung...
Kinderheim511M 3 weeks ago
157 USASHOLES press dislike
TheSubzerogr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
100% Phony moonlandings recorded in a studio
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SpreadingtheMuse beecoz3001 "OWNED" your ass like a whore in a crack house :):):)
beecoz3001 2 months ago
Maybe thta explains why they r looking for all the lunar rocks lol because today we can tell if something is fact or fiction thru DNA. I am suspect on everything now these days. I don't believe to much anymore that comes out of NASA or DC.
PROFILESophiaYates 2 months ago
I am open-minded about this issue but I give the video a bit more cred because of the fact that the top two negative comments come from people whose CHANNEL M.O. looks a bit.. well.. "questionable" (go, look, check 4 urself). People without a firm identity or presence either have something to HIDE or ??? ..anyway, I am a skeptic of all but never close my mind to any possibility.. PEACE! ~a~
AdonisKingAXC 2 months ago
The interplanetary medium is 99,727 degrees celcius and made of plasma.
Psy0psAgent 2 months ago
DON'T BE FOOLED ABOUT THE MISSION TO THE MOON!!
The greatest boast of the species is the event in human history most associated with pride in our landing accomplishment on the moon.
Twenty years later and years behind schedule the same space program couldn't put into earth orbit a telescope with a lens with focus but yet two decades earlier a mission one hundred times more complicated worked on its first occasion
= WAKE UP FROM THE BS!
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001 And two years after the gov allegedly covered up 10,000+ technicians and scientists spread out over the country, they all of a sudden couldnt even cover up 6 losers breaking into a hotel room.
The"hoax" is retarded, and so is anyone who believes it.
(BTW, Hubble was a subcontractor error, not a NASA error. Get your facts straight)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse IN TWO YEARS, WE WILL KNOW ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WHETHER OR NOT NASA SENT MEN TO THE MOON. AS JAPAN PREPARES TO LAUNCH A LUNAR SATELLITE WHICH WILL BE ABLE TO SHOOT CLOSER THE PICTURES - SHOULD BE ABLE TO REST THE CASE ONCE AND FOR ALL. IF THERE ARE SHUTTLE BASES AND FLAGS, THEN WE CAN ALL CONGRATULATE NASA
Right now, nobody has a telescope good enough to see close-enough ..yet NASA has 'telescopes' such as "Hubble" which can see for billions of light years .seems a bit strange??
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001 Japan ALREADY launched a LRO satellite. They ALREADY took pictures. Japan ALEADY said "Lookie it was real." If you cant keep up with rudimentary current events, you'll only get laughed at ;)
"seems strange" Nope. Cause you're a physics retard ;) Its the Hubble TELESCOPE, not the Hubble Microscope. Telescopes are built to focus on LARGE objects trillions of miles away. You cant ask it to work within 1/100000000th of what it was built for only to say "strange" like a newb ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SpreadingtheMuse Oh did they, oh yes and the big hype they promised with how well they will be able to see for sure IF man landed WAS NOT CONFIRMED = "as the images were blurred" LMFAO! If NASA can't even take a decent pic how the hell did they even land anyone on the moon? After comparing the image with it's 25km counterpart, it has become apparent that - despite all the hype - the newer 25km images are in fact no sharper than the earlier 50km images
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001 As I predicted, every single last dumb point you tried was due to your own ignorance. You didnt know about telescopes, didnt know about Japan's LRO, didnt know about air pressure, didnt know about frictionless flags etc etc etc. You're the perfect poster boy for the hoax, a GED drop-out with shit for experience who then naively wonders why everything goes over your head. I wonder why...
;)
Next time, dont use dumb talking points that were proven stupid 20 years ago
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse You asked for facts and I give you plenty, you give one LAME answer.
For a so called "Former Instructor of Physical Science and Mathematics, I am now a Health Physics Radiological Control " I say this BIGOT BOY YOU ARE ONE DUMB MISLED TWAT or are we secretly working for someone else? "SHILL"
beecoz3001 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SpreadingtheMuse Why were there no stars in the background of clear shots of deep-space?
A. Because faking the stars would have been impossible - they would remian fixed even when the men moved.
2. Why was the flag waving, there's no air on the moon?
3. Why was there no blast crater beneath the craft?
4. Why are the same backgrounds viewable at different locations?
There are photos of footprints eveywhere yet no blast crater and no dust on the footpads?
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Check out " WhiteJarrah" on you tube BIGOTBOY he will blow everything you mentioned into a thousand pieces. The most overwhelming anomalies to be found in the LRO photographs are the Apollo 15 rover tracks. Although appearing so prominent in the area surrounding the alleged lunar module, the trails from station to station are a different story. They gradually start to fade before disappearing altogether, as though the Photoshop editor drawing them in never finished his work.
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001 Jarrah is a lunatic He thinks Shuttle Challenger was a deliberate assassination of Christa MacCliffe. He's the worst of the fear-mongering paranoids and by bringing him up, you just admitted to being every bit the dumbass he is ;)
I've debated jarrah plenty you newb. I've heard it all before. He skips facts and makes stuff up as he goes. You were moronic to think I've never heard of him. And you're retarded to believe him.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse 1. 1) Under the right circumstances it is possible to photograph the brightest stars with a daylight exposure setting.A Better way to do it is to set the camera up on a tripod and take longer exposures, there is no reason why this could not have been done on Apollo. And the astronauts would indeed have been able to actually see the stars from the moon. Michael Melvil saw them whilst in suborbit on the earth's daylight side. The earth is about five times as bright as the moon.
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001
1) under "RIGHT" circumstances. So even you admit its dumb to expect stars in ALL circumstances. My point has been validated.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@beecoz3001 And NOW you're ignoring how stupid you were to bring up jarrah. You should ;)
So tell me, do YOU believe his retarded theory about Shuttle Challenger? Cause see, either:
1) You admit its stupid, therefore by extension, you admit jarrah is stupid, or
2) You claim its correct, meaning its now YOUR dumb idea that YOU have to prove, and you will get raked over the coals if you dont
So which will it be newb? ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
NUFFF SAID " SHILL " I understand about people like you fighting your masters in the sense of the NWO I have no more time for your completely LAME ASS GOVERNMENT SHILL SHIT!!
UNDERSTAND SHILL that you are NOTHING to these people, I bet you already have the RFID chip!! Keep spreading you intelligent BULLSHIT to the SHEEPLE " I was briefly a Hollywood Effects Artist " = "classic" you really can't make it up!
HOLLYWOOD the land of DECEPTION = GAME OVER BIGOTBOY :):):):)
beecoz3001 2 months ago
Comment removed
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001 With that eloquent response of crocodile tears, I accept your total surrender on every point ;)
You mean being a gullible conspirasheep did NOT prepare you to argue science with someone who actually works in it for a living? NAH!! You dont say. ;)
A pity you turned into a crybaby so quickly. You posted dumb "evidence" and got stomped like a tard. Cry to jarrah and he'll pat you on the head like a good widdle boy ;)
Newb ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@beecoz3001 And you bet your ass I was a Hollywood artist. Hell of a time too and I'm damn proud of it. Thats called "Getting out and having a life instead of whining about hoaxes in your parents basement." Dont worry, some day you'll move out of your parents and you can be a big boy. When you're about 45 ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse HEY SHILL > where's your comment on the "Evidence that Apollo images are manipulated" video? LMFAS!!!
beecoz3001 1 month ago
@beecoz3001 See one GED mcjob smudge facts about what he's an obvious newb in, and you've seen them all. ;)
If you're gullible enough to believe every 40 year old virgin who posts "FAKE!" on a dork message board, then that about sums you up, now doesnt it?
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@beecoz3001 So if I can name even one reason to explain the tracks, you'll admit to being an idiot? ;)
It never occured to you:
1) The terrain cannot possibly be totally identical everywhere. Some places the dust wasnt deep enough to leave tracks
2) The tracks were determined by how much force was applied, so going slower would leave a more shallow track, if any at all
I'm sorry, was this supposed to be hard? ;)
And no refute for my shooting down of your "points?" Thought so. Newb ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse You are the DUMBASS!
You explanation of the questions I asked you, supposedly such a clever man is feeble and so cringe worthy!
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001 Your "questions" are all infamous as the first talking points any newb cut and pastes from a dork webpage. We've seen them all before from other newbs who werent dumb enough to post them expecting a gold medal, as you were dumb enough to ;)
You got pwned ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse 2) The Apollo 15 flag waved when David Scott ran past it. The ALSJ ruled the footprint vibrations theory as doubtful. They concluded that Scott bumped it with his elbow, but analysis of the footage shows the initial movement began before he ran past it. This suggests he pushed air into the flag as he came near it.
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001
2) "ran past it" Uh huh. Once you pass 9th grade physics, thats called "vibrational footsteps." Duh.
"Doubtful" So says the hoax spaz ;) I TEACH physics dumbass. I require the opinion of no one, especially a newb hoaxtard. The flag moved via vibration.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse 3) Wernher von Braun in 1953 anticipated that there would be a huge blast crater beneath his proposed moonship with an exit exhaust pressure of only 0.15psi. Apollo had an exit pressure of 1.3psi.
I could go n on but all this time teaching a misled child like yourself is costing me time I do not have.No wonder I don't see you on Jarrah videos is Bee Coz he will shred your flimsy ass to pieces TARD!!
YOU ARE A GOVERNMENT SHILL = SIMPLE
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001 3) Since when does "anticipated" = "proven?" 1953? WTF? Before we had landed a single probe there? Taken a single pic? Before we knew ANYTHING about the surface? You barf out a flying guess and naively wonder why it didnt work out? WTF stupidity is that? ;)
Sorry, you still dont know shit ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@beecoz3001 For your information we are already able to see small items on the lunar surface. Including some of the left-overs from the landings. Moon Buggy included.
And it's rude to leave your CAPS LOCK on.
chiltington 1 month ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Questions; Apollo Moon Landing:
1. Why were there no stars in the background of clear shots of deep-space?
A. Because faking the stars would have been impossible - they would remian fixed even when the men moved.
2. Why was the flag waving, there's no air on the moon?
3. Why was there no blast crater beneath the craft?
4. Why are the same backgrounds viewable at different locations?
There are photos of footprints eveywhere yet no blast crater and no dust on the footpads? .
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001
Sorry, didnt see these questions before. But they're all cut and pasted talking points anyway ;)
1) It was Daytime, Duh
2) The flag is a flimsy piece of cloth in a frictionless environment. Try to STOP IT from moving. The slightest vibration or footsept would set it off
3) There shouldnt be. No physicist ever said there should be. Quote one if you can. But it fundemental ignorance. Do you park your car at 100mph? ;)
4) Convenient prejudice. You see what you want to
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse LOL sorry only just seen your other comments.
Actually I'm connected to the site thats been copied and pasted (fallenaliensDOTcom = learn something REAL)
STUPID ANSWER BIGOT BOY!
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001
(cont)
"no dust on footpads" Why would there be? "Settling" and "Floating" only happen in air. No air = no air pressure = no floating = no dust settling on footpads. You've never even seen the footage have you? All dust is thrown in parabolic frictionless arcs. Impossible in any atmosphere. Its a vacuum.
I'm sorry, was of that supposed to be hard? ;)
Those were predictable cut and pastes from the first dork site you found. They've been laughed at for years.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse And despite LRO being only 25km above the lunar surface, the earth-orbiting GeoEye-1 still takes better pictures of Apollo-sized objects from nearly 700km away. This ultimately calls into question the whole point of dipping into the lower altitude, assuming the LRO even dipped into this lower altitude at all FACT! (WATCH "MoonFaker: LRO at 25km?" and " MoonFaker: LRO, Silhouettes At 25km
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
Virgil [Gus] Grissom - astronaut - outspoken critic of the apollo missions, died along with 2 others, in Apoolo 1's fire on Jan 21st 1967 when a full-scale simulation burst into flames with the 3 astronauts sealed inside. Gus' family still believe he was intentionally silenced and say NASA know who was responsible
Thomas Ronald Baron was due to submit a 500 page report on findings that NASA would never get to moon !!
beecoz3001 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@beecoz3001 1. Why were there no stars in the background of clear shots of deep-space?
A. Because faking the stars would have been impossible - they would remian fixed even when the men moved.
2. Why was the flag waving, there's no air on the moon?
3. Why was there no blast crater beneath the craft?
4. Why are the same backgrounds viewable at different locations?
There are photos of footprints eveywhere yet no blast crater and no dust on the footpads?
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Baron, his wife and step-daughter, died when their car was struck by a train
Report vanished
1964 -1967 a total of 10 astronauts met with untimely deaths
15% of NASA's Astronaut core were killed in freak accidentsAs this was before the supposed landing, it must have been about removing them from the contest as they were not of a certain disposition - they had an avertion to lies perhaps? - they couldn't be bought?
WATCH " 1969 WE DID NOT LAND ON THE MOON" Mr MISLED LoooL
beecoz3001 2 months ago
@beecoz3001 Why is every death always "untimely" or "mysterious?" I wont buy biased assumptions where everything is always a "freak accident." Its just making up your story as you go. Aldrin could die in his sleep tomorrow and you'd still scream "CIA SNIPER!" Its retarded.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
Comment removed
beecoz3001 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SpreadingtheMuse Only one answer for so many facts??
LooooooooooooL from a man whose certain man went to the moon :)
I see a pay cut coming from "your" (laughing so much) pay masters unless you really have been MISLED!
Love n Peace
beecoz3001 2 months ago
Look how pathetic the pictures look
mrstevoh123 2 months ago
No man went to the moon !
mrstevoh123 2 months ago
@mrstevoh123 :)
beecoz3001 2 months ago
Comment removed
mrstevoh123 2 months ago
moon landing = fake
yourmajezty 4 months ago
We went to the moon, end of, if you don't belive me, fire lazors at it untill you get one back.
pbrew85 4 months ago
why dont you answer your debunker, and why this piece of shit is still up polluting people mind?
lapmarty 4 months ago
you can check hundreds of "fake" pictures in Nasa website of every Apollo mission on the moon.
echozgus 5 months ago
LOL 2007 post still fooling people today. If your dumb enough to believe this video than your dumb enough to stay in your minimum wage job for life.
WDPlumbing 6 months ago 2
This video must set a record for the amount of nonsense that can be spewed out in 8 minutes and 4 seconds.
johnmo752 6 months ago
Yes. Where are the "we went to the moon" people on this video? They probably ran off to watch that Mythbusters episode they love so much to try to come up with some new arguments.
NasaFakedItAll 7 months ago
@NasaFakedItAll It's impossible to reason with you hoaxers, so most people probably don't even care.
But the fact is that this moon footage has been scrutinized many times by all kinds of scientists for all kinds of sources (yes, some of them were independent as well) - and if this was in any way faked then that would be an official truth LONG ago.
Do you see any serious physicist or physics teacher deny the moon landings?
They are pretty much non-existent.
Laurelindo 6 months ago
When you see the astronauts covered from head to foot in dust then see the PERFECT photos they took....where was the dust on the camera lens?....how can you wipe clean a lens with a dusty glove and also you cannot see what you are cleaning as its on your chest...try it at home on your own camera cover with dust and point it away from you and clean it...try it oh and stick a goldfish bowl on your head at the same time
WELLBRAN 7 months ago
Anyone heard of the Glast Burst Monitor? This satellite monitors gamma radiation in space. The energy readings are so high that they register in 100 MeV's and over. During a solar flare, the readings are incredible. The power of the sun and all that radiation flowing through space will kill you quickly. NASA knew this which is why they had to fake the missions. Anyone trying to reach the moon would be dead long before they got there without proper shielding or electromagnetic shields.
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@Daddyo930 Awesome point Daddy, I am going to check that out. The Nasa Cheerleaders always say stuff like, "Well the radiation was not that bad, (and) the specks of dust that could have punctured the suits and craft were just not that prevelent when they went." It is such horse shit, when you add all those little things us that they squeeked out you see it was impossible, its all just a string of well thought out lies.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ There is also the SOLRAD and CERRES satellite data you can use. There is an article called "Deadly Radiation At and Past the Van Allen Shields". You can also mention the fact that during apollo 12, 10 major solar flares were reported. No one can survive even one of those let alone 10. Some of those solar flares were solar proton events (extreme levels of radiation). Thank you for having an open mind.
Daddyo930 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
210 MeV: The average energy released in fission of one Pu-239 atom.
200 MeV: The average energy released in nuclear fission of one U-235 atom .
17.6 MeV: The average energy released in the fusion of deuterium and tritium to form He-4; this is 0.41 PJ per kilogram of product produced.
1 MeV: Or, 1.602×10−13 J, about twice the rest mass-energy of an electron.
Maximum Energy = 1e+10 MeV (1E+10 = 10,000,000,000 MeV)
No electromagnetic shields = death in space. Quickly.
Daddyo930 7 months ago
40 years ago they walked on the moon. 40 years later, nothing. Yeah,right!
If you believe in a moon landing, online poker isnt rigged either.
rimmyou69 7 months ago
@rimmyou69 There is no reason for them to return to the moon, because they have been there six times already - in fact they are preparing for a journey to Mars right now, and that's much more interestin from a publicistic perspective.
But they also have plans on making a moon base in the near future.
Laurelindo 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
" I'm not sure these men walked on the Moon" Brian O' Leary.
"I don't know how long before I ceased to be known as the Moon man" NeilArmstrong.
"It was a stunt" Buzz Aldrin.
"Maybe you should find Armstrong and ask him" Jan Lundberg
"The old carpenter was ahead of his time" Bill Clinton
"My father's death was no accident. He was murdered.”
Scott Grissom.
"Did you ever wonder why Nixon was not present at the Apollo11 launching?" Nikita Khrouschev
"This whole thing was a hoax" Bill Kaysing.
potrodsas 7 months ago
DeadJesus100 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NO STARS IN NASA'S FAKE APOLLO UNIVERSE
ARMSTRONG the Traitor said he never saw stars in cislunar space
Can you imagine an astronaut saying that he never saw stars in space?
I don't blame him because Nazi Nasa instructed him what to say
when he gave the interview after the FAKE APOLLO 11 MISSION
DeadJesus100 7 months ago
Only retards think the Moon landing was fake. If you think the Moon landing was fake, you are a retard.
1AirStreamDriver1 7 months ago
@1AirStreamDriver1 the Retard
Did you fuck your flkag today?
Tell us what protects the moon from cosmic radiation?
Lol come on kid prove you are not a retard
DeadJesus100 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ ...You frauds go around all day claiming the government and media control the truth and call people who don't agree with "sheep". When the tables get turned what happens? You act like a 5 year old. I knew you were a fake with nothing to say, you just proved it.
teddysalad65 7 months ago
Since you decided to step to me (perhaps you were ordered to?), why don't you atleast comment on the information I have presented? No? Don't want to do that? I would not want to either.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
Wow, got real quiet in here huh? Try and grasp as much info as you can before it is totally removed for you.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ ...It got quiet because all the hoax belivers left in shame after the HD LRO photo s came out. Only a few silly boys like you are still around talking to yourself ;)
teddysalad65 7 months ago
@teddysalad65 Mmm, no. Its guys like you that are still around, not talking about the points. Just slinging insults and walking away. You are the coward and the fool. I love how you do not talk about ANYTHING, just insult. Can't you see what you are doing? You are the one who is the follower, doing what you have been programmed to do. Scared Coward Child.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ ...remember this guy Tommy?---->
"Just slinging insults and walking away. You are the coward and the fool. I love how you do not talk about ANYTHING, just insult."
<-------..that was you yesterday, This is you today:
From: MrTommYYZ
TeddyTossesSalads
Hey fuck twat, why are you such a stupid fuck tard asshole coward?
Sent to: teddysalad65
_________
You're a fake, Tommy, we know why your here and it doesn't have anything to do with the 6 Moon landings. You just want to spew.
teddysalad65 7 months ago
@teddysalad65 Ha ha, that is awesome, thank you for degrading yourself for everyone, I just wanted to keep it between you and me but if you want to share. Well are you going to answer my question for everyone? Yeah, that is me, I am slinging an insult and stepping to your coward ass, fuck tard. So now I guess you have two unanswered questions to answer.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ ....My only point was to show that your were a fake. Mission accomplished. You're free to go ;)
teddysalad65 7 months ago
@teddysalad65 I am not going anywhere you coward fuck tard, I know you want me to go because you are shitting your pants right now.....but, HOW exactly did you prove that I was a fake? by calling you out as a fucking scared little boy fuck tard? My mission was accomplished with that one. What exactly is fake about distrust of the govt? Why wont you even attempt to disput what I have said? Because you got nothing, nothing you scared little boy.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ lol teddysalad the vegetable is a troll and a coward
DeadJesus100 7 months ago
@DeadJesus100 It appears so.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
Ok now here is a great way to separate yourself from the rest of the NASA cheerleaders. You had asked me to back up what I have said, I have done so. Now think clearly before you address this.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
For those who are interested, Dave Mcgowan's series, Wagging The Moon Doggie, on his website, A Center For An Informed America. Great series. Before I read this I was a believer in the moon landings.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ ...>"Dave Mcgowan's series, Wagging The Moon Doggie, on his website, A Center For An Informed America. Great series. Before I read this I was a believer in the moon landings.<'
-------
You let Dave McGowan flip you over like a 10$ hooker? Lol, I bet even Dave McGowan is laughing at how easy you are. McGowan was doing an experiment to see how gullible people are and how easily manipulated they can be. You fell for it like a little lamb ;)
teddysalad65 7 months ago
I love how the video starts with a lie, that is is the internet that makes a moon hoax case. There were probably more AMericans then that knew it was a lie in the 60s than there are now. Shit, go to germany, ask 9 out of 10 people and they will say ofcourse we faked it. The reason the lie is able to live so strongly is because we are sheep in the USA.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ The number of Germans believing in a hoax is a figure you have made out. Polls in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and the Benelux countries have shown, that only 5 to 8 percent believe in the fake-theory. Now it would be interesting to know, who is the real liar ;)
CHSarahBs 7 months ago
@CHSarahBs I will answer that question by giving you a different example but with the same govt process. Would you be suprised to believe that the majority, over 90% of the people in Pakastan, Iraq, afganistan and the region believe Osama Bin Laden to have been CIA? Suprised that Alquida is seen as a CIA front? You should be, because you will never hear that opinion on OUR media, though it is common knowledge in that part of the country, and that is true, the CIA has orchestrated all of it.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ So Sarah, I will ask you to do this. When you want to show proof of something, do not go to what has been presented for you, go to the source. That number I gave is right online with the number of Germans I have spoken to PERSONALLY. I believe you will have the same experience. When discussing such large topics, know that there is govt interest in how those conversations go. Know that the govt does not believe in free enterprise, they have fingers in all media pies.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ I prefer to go to the sources. And guess what? The people I was talking to were laughing about the idea of a moon hoax.
If something that has been showed to me, is peer-reviewed, there is no logic to doubt it.
CHSarahBs 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CHSarahBs Ha ha, well this is how they are able to fool you so well. Now I do not believe you are a fool, just fooled. Because you talk to a few Americans who believe what they have been programed to believe does not make it true. You asked for an example, here is a watered down one, but search for video: "Good Morning America learns that Bin Laden is CIA "
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ It would be interesting to see a valid source for this number, similar to the number of the German hoax believers ;)
CHSarahBs 7 months ago
@MrTommYYZ ...you've been leaving a lot of comments here lately. How much do you get paid to leave comments? I know the Chinese and Russian governments pay people like you spread disinformation. I also heard Dave McGowan pays people to mention his book on these channels. You must be making a lot of money doing this. You haven't presented any information about how the Moon landings could have been hoaxed and I don't care what % of the populations believes its a hoax. That's not an argument.
teddysalad65 7 months ago
@teddysalad65 Ha ha, Nee How Comrade!!! You heard a lot about Mcgowan huh? What a crock, and what a loser you are. If you have been reading my posts than you will see how I explain how the major world govts are in colusion. If ANYONE is paying people to post it is the US govt, and if ANYONE is getting paid by them it is you. WHat you are doing is text book bait and switch, insult the person and do not address any information, and claim the person has provided no info when they clearly have.
MrTommYYZ 7 months ago
why dont u non believers climb out of ur moms basement get a girlfriend and get a life
rich6421 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Even though I'm sure they hide away in USA,I have send an email to the European parliament asking to make a decision not to allow entrance in Europe to the Apollo so called "astronauts" for the deception and fraud they commit against humanity.Anyone who agree with this ,please send your emails at will.Let's take some action against these criminals.
potrodsas 7 months ago
With my limited science education I've shot you down in flames without getting very far into the video, so any further argument is futile. Until you can at least get a little science education you should quit with the Hoax nonsense.
notafraidoffuture 8 months ago
Limited computing power? Man was put on the moon with a slide rule. The same thing makes a slide rule work as makes a computer work... logarithms. So you see, a slide rule is a manual computer. The measurements they used to fire the engines for orbital burns were astronomical. Like navigating a ship across the ocean using the stars. Pretty accurate.
notafraidoffuture 8 months ago
If the mountains in the distance were quite a distance away you could move a few hundred yards either direction and the LEM would be out of view, but the perspective of the mountians would remain essentially unchanged...looking as though the module was in one picture but not in the other... IDIOTS... FAIL!
notafraidoffuture 8 months ago
Sunlight from the left side at that low angle would not light all of the way to the horizon. The curvature of the moon would lessen the reflection intensity...OPTICS 101... and also at a much more rapid rate since the moon's curvature is sharper than earth's which is our normal point of reference. FAIL
notafraidoffuture 8 months ago
They call this a hoax.But yet the same fools want to believe theres an imaginary being watching over them .LOL!!
MrMic1146 8 months ago
@MrMic1146 I've seen proof for both sides of this issue, there is a video that seems to show 'faking' but idk. That video may have been edited to look like hoaxing. If it were shown to be real, then it'd be a 'smoking gun' in this arguement. But i haven't seen it shown to be such. I do think we landed on the moon, but people have fair questions. And as for the last part of your comment, belief in God is more rational than a physics defying explosion
CJFRANKS7 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The American NAzA astronaut in the 60s and scientific adviser of the Apollo program O' Leary in a 2002 interview stated : " Regarding the Apollo missions I'm not sure these men walked on the Moon,it's possible that NAzA had cover it up"...And I don't think any the fucking trolls here (Windley ,Plait etc) knows any better than Mr O' Leary. watch?v=lOyYZIW0zvY
potrodsas 9 months ago
It never fails to amaze me how many people just can't accept things the way they are. Always trying to see conspiracies around every corner. I suppose you are the same people that think Elvis is still alive. For Christ sake, grow up and drag yourselves into the 21st century.
bushhunter90001 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
From what this fucking allan bean clown says ,it seems the "astronauts" never had any instruments to measure the radiation levels going to the"moon" . Great.! Next time they tell us they went to the Moon on horses.
potrodsas 9 months ago
As far as I am concerned, the preponderance of evidence, which in many circumstances has been proven factual, man did land on the moon. Not even taking into account that I personally sat at home as a young boy and watched nearly all the news coverage, every one of the questions you people that cannot seem to pull your head out of your dumb asses that say it was faked has been answered. It was not faked, the moon landings were real. Grow up and accept the facts. anyone that does not, IDIOT.
bushhunter90001 9 months ago
@bushhunter90001 oh man how stupid u r..very sad
sccooty 9 months ago
@bushhunter90001 Go hunter the truth, you sat at home and watched a film. They may have gone to the moon but should we not ask questions or do we accept the moon is flat..
123coining123 9 months ago
@bushhunter90001 Bollocks
Chev4206 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Voice 1 :"Ermm Hoaxton we have a problem.."
Voice 2: " what"
Voice 1 "Ermm Hoaxton there is something wrong with the color of the sky ,it's blue"
Voice 2:" this is because you are in Earth's orbit, NOT in deep space fucking moron!"
Voice 1:" Ermm Hoaxton thanks,ermm lloud and clear"
watch?v=mOY0WkZAnEY
potrodsas 9 months ago
Hmmm, there was a lot of stuff about the 'hoax' moon landing a few years ago and I then thought the evidence for or against was inconclusive- however it now seems to be without a doubt that the Americans were working together with the Russians to produce this elaborate hoax. In so many areas things just aren't what they seem to be... get used to it....
Modonaut57 9 months ago
@Modonaut57 It now seems? I am wondering about this term, if you are referring to the questions of this video here. They are totally answered and this for years and decades. Sorry, but there is no shred of evidence for a hoax.
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi, watch my video.
watch?v=803Oa0CpJ4s
Radiation. Is Human Space Exploration Possible with Todays Shielding Technology
superpowersunit 9 months ago
They aren't sucha idiots, ofcourse there is no wind, thats why they putted iron flag. Duuuuuh
GTAstuntes1 9 months ago
ha! stupid lying cunts. everything uttered by the usurpers of this country is a fraud.
SayNoToBrainWashing 10 months ago
Look at the wires.
watch?v=23_QdAz2tfY
MickeyMouseApollo 10 months ago
I lean towards the side that it was all a big lie and was faked. Why? Simply because of all of the indescrepancies. There are just too many of them.
fanbutton 10 months ago
@fanbutton I do not want to offend you, but maybe those indescrepancies are only things, you do not understand. All those evidences has been debunked several times for 40 years now. And this only with a bit of logic and understanding of basic science.
CHSarahBs 10 months ago
@CHSarahBs Sorry if you took my comment lightly. I should of said that after thoroughly researching all of the available evidence and scientific facts based on the laws of physics, I have come to the conclusion that there are simply too many descrepancies in the whole manned moon landing story. As far as they being "all debunked", well that's a matter of opinion. You are certainly welcome to yours.
fanbutton 10 months ago
@fanbutton I do not think, that this is a matter of opinions. This is only a matter of facts based on science. I would be glad to know, which points you see as discrepancies.
CHSarahBs 10 months ago
In the distant future we may see humans to the Moon.
We are optimistic that the United Hoaxland of America will not exist at that time.
potrodsas 10 months ago
several of those have been debunked by mythbusters, but more to the point if Apollo never left near earth orbit how do you explain the utter silence from the Soviet Union and other nations that would have been able to track the craft and see that it never left earth orbit? The USSR would have had a nice presentation on the floor of the UN long before Apollo 11 ever returned.
or maybe they keep quiet to honor the memory of JFK?
or because of Hunchbacked USSR/US 'reach around' theory?
TheZachish 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheZachish NOTHING has been debunked by mythbusters
xismxist 10 months ago
@TheZachish How would Soviets had track Apollo when they didnt have any radiotelescope that was for Apollos band, 2.3 GHz?
xismxist 10 months ago
@xismxist RATAN-600 radio telescope
TheZachish 10 months ago
@TheZachish BULLSHIT, they couldnt even track their own lunas... it was jodrell bank who tracked them
xismxist 10 months ago
@TheZachish WHO/WHATdid they track with the RATAN-600? do you have the documented transscript?
xismxist 10 months ago
@xismxist you could always go to Wikipedia and search "third party evidence for Apollo moon landings".
apollo(dot)mem-tek(dot)com/weblinks(dot)html
TheZachish 10 months ago
@TheZachish I could, and i did... it just doesnt exists.
xismxist 10 months ago
@xismxist you could and did? then this is a conspiracy since I just did it about an hour ago... WOW you caught them in the act you did.
or maybe you should try it again I think your finger slipped.
OBL is dead… oh wait let me guess you think he was an innocent man or has been dead for years right?
TheZachish 10 months ago
@TheZachish site doesnt exists your moron
xismxist 10 months ago
@xismxist type it in google the page will be the first one
TheZachish 10 months ago
@TheZachish i dont find anything special on that propaganda site
xismxist 10 months ago
@xismxist
I live conspiracy theorist… I truly do, any and all evidence anything that suggest they might be wrong is 'propaganda' and clearly wrong.
the LRO takes pics and those are lies, the next generation cameras that will be able to read the USA plaque and show all 50 stars on the flags are all lies and trickery. even if it is a Japanese or Chinese craft.
God or Aliens could come and say it happened and even transport you to the moon to see it and you would still not believe.
TheZachish 10 months ago
@TheZachish LRO took pics of some small dots that always has been there. Amazing that after 40 years no one has ever been taking pics of the hardware supposly left there by NASA, lmao
xismxist 10 months ago
@xismxist name me a camera or satellite that currently exist that can take a better photo of the moon then the High Res ones from the LRO
PS if you say the Hubble your are wrong.
TheZachish 10 months ago
@TheZachish Who mentioned that?! with taking pics of hardware, i meant REAL closeup pics from moons surface, not some crappy orbit pics thats nothing else than small dots who has always been there. Why not send up a rocket and a lander with a RC car, and simply locate i.e Apollo 11 landing site? it would be extremely easy today, Lunochods was radio controlled and thats 40 years ago! with todays standard it wont be any problem at all!
xismxist 10 months ago
@xismxist So these small dots had landing pads on them an cast a square shadow did they? what would be the point in sending a space ship to the moon to take pictures of the landing sites? all you odd balls would say is they are faked anyway so no point.
musicbruv 9 months ago
what is this music in the beginning? 00:30
tenthousandyearsgoon 10 months ago
if you add texture to a surface shadows don't flow the same way.... the reason the astronaut is not shadowed by the lander is because the lunar surface itself reflects light ... hence the brightness to his spacesuit
Losdouble 11 months ago
100% fake
shagy9111 11 months ago
It was very nice of Jean Michel Jarre to give you permission to use his music for the soundtrack. Have you known him long?
GlowWorm1962 11 months ago
it would be intresting to scan the lunar surface with a big telescope and find the moduel base that was left behind I think that would end the debate
wizardman42 11 months ago
@wizardman42 No, it would not. Take the LRO images. They show all the equipment and the LMs left on the lunar surface. But this is no evidence for the hoax believers. They prefer to say, LRO is faked, too.
CHSarahBs 11 months ago
@CHSarahBs
of course the LRO pictures are faked: the shadows of the landers don't even correspond with the landers themselves; furthermore there are several landers, and they are always near a hole.
Not counting the other incoherencies!
hunchbacked 10 months ago
@hunchbacked So scientists and experts round the world are fooled and we need some YT-user to tell us what is wrong? Nice;)
CHSarahBs 10 months ago
@CHSarahBs
I don't see scientists and experts talking on the net; what I see is amateurs and misinformed journalists.
hunchbacked 10 months ago
@hunchbacked I agree. I prefer to talk with experts and scientists. I am amused about this hoax believer phenomen.
CHSarahBs 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CHSarahBs
And I am amused about this Apollo believer phenomen.
hunchbacked 10 months ago
@hunchbacked you will never hear a doctor talk bad of another even if a doctor kills patients right and left. that would not be professinal.Expert, scientific, whatever
datzfast 10 months ago
@CHSarahBsand why not? the fist thing every body did was look at the pixels. and ask themselves can a camera do this?
datzfast 10 months ago
@TheJomogogo I'm disappointed with your ignorance, that's a fact. First of all, I never said the moonlandings were faked, but the true is that there isn't one single solid proof that we have been there. Can you deny it? The problem is that you think that everyone with scientific knowledge believe we've been on the moon and that's not true - just face it.
xzktplm 11 months ago
@xzktplm >"First of all, I never said the moonlandings were faked, but the true is that there isn't one single solid proof that we have been there."<
_____
There are over 840 pounds of solid Moon rocks that they brought back. Plus LRO photos of the landing sites.
teddysalad65 11 months ago
That last picture..the earth is much too large for being 225,000 miles away
Freeskies 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Freeskies ">That last picture..the earth is much too large for being 225,000 miles away<"
---------------------
How big does it look to you when you're 225,000 miles away? What is your point of reference?
teddysalad65 11 months ago
THE LIE watch?v=BnKlHgDBjUI
NASAHOAX 11 months ago
i kinda have a problem with the temperatures on the moon and it's effect on 120 roll film which the hasselblad cameras used. i've been out in snow and the films fogged, not radiation just snow. i don't accept that this film would have survived the extreme conditions at all. AND why havent they gone back to pick up all the trash they left there?
blakeyonthebuses 11 months ago
@blakeyonthebuses They landed in the lunar morning with relatively accurate temperatures.
You really want to pay for a mission to pick up the trash on several different locations? For what?
CHSarahBs 11 months ago
i have no clue about physics but the fact there was an engine noise and the noise was focused on the astronauts as for the waving flag the fabric of the flag has a wire mesh sewn into it. The flag rolls up into a nice little package. When on the Moon, the astronauts extend the pole and stick it into the ground. They can then unroll the flag causing it to move.
i belive it was real parts were faked like the pictures but that dosnt mean we didnt go to the moon but anyway
great video
19979999 1 year ago
@19979999 i meant to say there was an engine noise
19979999 1 year ago
I have read it, and my conclusion is: Percy lies similar to Wisnewski.
CHSarahBs 1 year ago
read `Dark Moon` by David Percy, and `One Small Step` by Gerhard Wisnewski.
Both books give INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF that the `still pictures` and `camera` footage of the Apollo missions on the moon are fake.
They do not dismiss the possibility we went to the moon entirely, only that the coverage itself was not genuine.
If you don`t read the evidence from the investigations in full,you cannot entirely dismiss their work on the subject.
imurboogeyman4 1 year ago
I belive this!! there is enough evidence.
Raddin619 1 year ago
your fake
Shooterday123 1 year ago
Kurt Cobain, who's been sleeping on my couch since 1994, says it's all a fake.
TacomaPaul 1 year ago