Added: 3 months ago
From: rerousey
Views: 10,084
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (369)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wrong 1,000% :) u fight in a ring u all see marquez won really clear

  • @w3r0ification you need to watch it in replay this time. OH by the way... Please dont smoke that crack before watching it.

  • correct 100%

  • I watched this fight over and over and over.. I didn't see marquez winning it.. My advice to marquez and his followers; U need to attack, be aggressive and dictate the fight. U are trying to get the belt from a champion but that's not what happened. Pacquiao is the champion and he was d aggressor. He was the one dictating the fight.. Who in their right mind thinks marquez win this? absolutely absurd..

  • at first watching the fight live, I really thought marquez won the fight coz you can see clearly his counter punches connected to pac. but after seing the HBO replay in slow motion I changed my mind pac really won the fight fair and square. you can see it clearly that most of JMM punches did not connect, some connected to pac's arms and elbows. while pac landed more combination on Jmm's face. we can see on JMM's swollen Face post fight

  • Are you related to the female MMA fighter Ronda Rousey?? or is it just a coincidence??

  • Men your back! Nice to hear from you !

  • champ is still the champ the challenger lose period next mayweather hahaha.i hope he step on the ring and stop the alibis and fight now lool mayweather youhuuuu hahaha

  • I liked so much how you raised the odds 9-1.That made a great illusion for others uplifting Marquez to have won the fight.

  • pactard!

  • I know that when a south paw and a conventional stances meet that foot stepping would occur. I watched the fight three times now and noticed that the foot stepping by JMM was in my opinion was too excessive. I felt he was doing it purposely. What do you think?

  • Another nice view from rerousey. Exactly what I have in mind and the minds of all logical thinking boxing followers.

  • its Nacho Beristáin not Nacho Bernstien. He's not Jewish sir. You got the name wrong and the winner wrong sir..

  • Manny was very cautious. He didn't agressivly fight. He backed off many times he even started the foot stepping.

    watch?v=JCaTySM3CZE

    Most of CompuBox punches landed by Pacman were scrapping shots above the head. Marquez punched the sweat off Manny. Marquez ripped Pacmans mouth open. Marquez knocked hi mouth piece off.

    Marquez eye was only swolen because of the headbutts.

  • @MiguelCottoEsLoMejor Evey line in your comment is wrong. 1) Manny was the agressive one in the fight. 2) compubox was accurate and Manny did land a lot. 3)The busted lower lip is very common in fights. 4) Manny's mouthpiece came off by itself. 5) Marquez' swollen eyes were already there before their head banged. No disrespect but watch the fight again.

  • You are the only one who thinks Manny won. Smitty thought he won. ON HBO POLL 90% boxing experts, people from the UK, USA, Amir Khan, LInares, Chavez Jr. and most of all Roach fighters thought he won. African Americans think he won. We Puerto Ricans thought he won.

  • @MiguelCottoEsLoMejor Too bad they all didn't have to do with the fight. All the judges thought manny won. The commentators, Emmanuel Stuart, Jim Lampley, Max Kellerman & Lederman clearly couldn't express themselves enough and what rerousy is saying here are the very thought I exactly have in mind. This is what happens when the fight is close. Fans tend to favor their fighters and when they don't get the results they want they accuse and disrespect the judges and authorities. It's a shame..

  • @MiguelCottoEsLoMejor UK is still holding grudge against Manny putting Hatton to sleep. Mayweather fans and Mexicans, well do I need to say more? This is a PERFECT time to attack Pacquiao, kinda' like when the Mayweathers accused him of using steroids every haters in the planet all of a sudden came out with their own opinions ranting about him using steroids when we all know that they just heard that and wanted to ride the wagon so to speak. C'mon man.. Judges made the right judgement period.

  • @edbosch1 I guess the whole world is holding a grudge against pacman. Because 9 out of 10 boxing experts and even non experts saw Marquez win.

    Stevie wonder saw pacman lose haha

  • @MiguelCottoEsLoMejor since Stevie wonder is literally blind, maybe he thinks pac lose because of the Mexicans hearsay. LOL

  • R.I.P boxing!

  • u stupid man! I'm sick of these dumb ass pactards bringing up "oh we expected that pac wud steamroll jmm and when he didnt it justed appeared like Marquez won". Man that is some stupid ass sh!t!!! Cmon now. We saw a fight where one guy was dictating the fight completely. The other guy was flailing around. C'mon now man!! u a pactard. I've seen ur other vids. manny's been fighting statues and straight up guys. it showed he never improved his boxing skills since last tym they fought.

  • Dude, u dont wanna see pac v floyd!!!!! it will be like floyd vs gatti. A floyd mayweather smack down from start to finish!!!! Marquez will win a rematch easy

  • Dude, manny looked amatuerish. Marquez controlled the fight from start to finish. Expectations don't come into it. The fact is that Marquez was doing what he wanted to do and made manny fight his fight. That's the top and the bottom of it. I gave pacquiao rounds 1, 6 and 12. That's all. There wasn't one SINGLE ROUND that manny won definitively. NOT ONE. Marquez gave him a counterpunching lesson.

  • @brendos444 Yup, thank you! Well said.

  • Many believe that Pacquiao lost this fight, including Al Bernstein and Dan Rafael. They say that Pacquiao didn't look like the same fighter, didn't have his rhythm, or was off balanced. What they should do is re-examine the fight, and watch Marquez's foot. Marquez doesn't even try to remove his foot ; instead, he takes advantage of Manny's trapped foot and throws a couple of punches. This foot trapping by Marquez should explain why Manny looked off balanced , or out of rhythm.

  • Dude.. i dont know what fight u seen but my co-workers who are filipinos said pacquiao lost this fight and that marquez got robbed...so that tells u everything pacquiao clearly lost this fight.. after the fight he was interviewd and he could not talk like if he was in a state of shock that he won...then he said "i want to thank god for giving me the decision to win the fight" manny should not thank god on your decision..the desicion was made by people whos poketing the money h.b.o. bob arum.

  • @MrManny7426 Just because your filipino friends thinks he lost doesnt mean he really did.. do you believe everything your friends tell u?lol

  • @whothefkamiwatching and why would they lie..they said they seen the first and second fight and it was fair scores.. but this third time they said he clearly got robbed and i also agree..whats so hard to understand?

  • @MrManny7426 why you mad? marquez fan are we? looool

  • @whothefkamiwatching And what do u know about boxing youre a canadian lol

  • @MrManny7426 is that why all your people come over here for a better life? HAHAHAHHAHAH

  • @whothefkamiwatching the same reason why you and your relatives fled your country and live in america haha

  • @MrManny7426 HAHAHA u keep failing dude this is our homeland even my great great grandfather was born here HHAHAHAHHAAAHA too bad for your family.. they have to work so hard to be able to go here pathetic losers haha

  • @whothefkamiwatching DumbAss!! Im native american tribe called blackfoot from montana...hahahaha respect ..u sounding so weak much less your appearance lol

  • @MrManny7426 You type like an Asian guy which means you're lying.. that means you fail.. and so is your country and your whole family hhahaha.. Nice name MrManny HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • That's a good analysis sir!

    when pacquiao-marquez 4 is set, mexican fans should CONVINCE their warrior to give a good, AGGRESSIVE fight he used to be doing.....

    marquez fans say, that trilogy made pacman look bad and off night......

    marquez look worst...JUST WAITED and counterpunched, he look TERRIBLY AFRAID and never attacked like real mexican warriors are known for.

    Honestly, we were expecting marquez to give manny a fight like he did to mayweather----agressive and real warrior!....

  • pacquiao accurately hits marquez (face/head) a lot at rounds 10,11,12 where marquez is missing his jabs. . Play it in SLOMO to see how the heck you could say marquez won. marquez had good rounds but pacquiao had most.

    Just because pacman did not give marquez a " one-sided fight in his favor" would mean he doesn't deserve to win.

    Had marquez fought the way he did with Mayweather (aggressive and attacking) he would have been knockd out.

  • you can be a boxing judges someday dude.nice analysis,I watch the fight 3 times and i score 118-110 pacman.i give round 5 and round 7 for marquez,,marquez is a challenger he must push the fight and not backpedaling.

    pls watch the reply and mute it.you will see who won the fight.

  • @SuperVash01 This is just stupid. Manny only wins rounds 1, 6 and 12... and round 12 only just. The rest of the fight was Marquez controlling the tempo and the range of the fight.

  • @brendos444 what do you mean controlling the tempo?by backpedaling and waiting for the counter punch?come on like i said marques is challenger he must be the aggressive but afraid to make a move.

  • @SuperVash01 lol.... Manny was frustrated. He didn't throw any combination cos he was scared of getting countered. Marquez dictated the fight. If manny ever fights floyd he'll get whooped! u pactards need to learn about boxing lol

  • @brendos444 you must learn the boxing rules.manny is not frustrated.marques is frustrated because he is afraid to pacmans punch that why he is backpedaling.are you crying?LOL

  • @SuperVash01 lol u werent watching the fight. Manny was losing. Freddie knew it. They didn't have any answers. Marquez wasn't backpeddling. he was circling to manny's right. If Marquez was backpeddling he would have been conrned on the ropes. This never happend. They fought in the centre of the ring with Marquez stepping out of range, Manny getting off balance then countered. perfect tactics by jmm. pac got exposed and floyd will ko this pretender.

  • @brendos444 i understand you,because u cant accept your lost,

  • ...But 1st, they should get on with the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight already. Floyd said he reserved May 5 for Manny and Pacman said let's get it on. Pacquiao-Marquez IV could wait anyway since win, lose or draw against Floyd, people will still buy it. On the other hand, Even if Pacquiao wins against JMMon the 4th match, the stock of the superfight won't go up anymore.

    The economics of Pac-May is dependent on each other continuing to win, while Pac-JMM 4 is already independent of everything else.

  • I agree..except the part that it was a clear win. I got it 115-113 for Pacquiao but it could be a draw or 115-113 in favor of Marquez and I wouldn't really complain due to the closeness.

    If this fight indeed did more than 1.5M buys, they should put the rematch at Cowboy Stadium because I feel it would be filled up. Secondly it should be open scoring like to see if either should keep pressing or can coast already. Thirdly, give Marquez his $10M because he deserves it...

  • Nice analysis.. you nailed it...

  • PROFESSIONAL FIGHTERS ARE SPORT, THEY DO NOT CRY AS FAR AS I CAN RECALL.

  • rousey ive been looking for u for months man someone said u died

  • @MikeJustDidit No, I am alive and well.

  • Pls people,if you wonder why Marquez landed solid punches on Pacquiao watch this link...

    "Pacquiao vs Marquez 3 Foot Stopper Count Challenge - YouTube"

  • 100% true.

  • Great fight analysis as usual. Totally agree with you man. Marquez could have won it had he showed more aggressiveness specially in those championship rounds. He fought well but just didn't do enough to take the belt from Pac. Its either he got tired or he was very confident that he was way ahead in the score cards.

  • MARQUEZ STAYED AWAY PACQUIAO. COZ HES AFRAID TO BE KO BY PACQUIAO. MARQUEZ CANT KO PACQUIAO. PACQUIAO CAN KO MARQUEZ. LOOK AT THEIR FACES. PACQUIAO STILL THE SAME EXCEPT FOR CUTS, MARQUEZ SWOLLEN FACE COZ BY PACQUIAO POWER PUNCH IN LONG DISTANCE. IF PACQUIAO HITS HIM IN SHORT DISTANCE SURELY HE WILL BE KO'ed. MARQUEZ AND MOSLEY ARE JUST THE SAME..RUNNING RUNNING..FIGHT PACQUIAO TOE TO TOE. PACQUIAO IS UNBEATABLE COZ HES VERY STRONG AS BEAST , STRONG AS SAMSON...PLS REFLECT

  • agree....

  • TO EVERYONE: what matters last saturdays fight is all about the style. Pacquiao-attacker; marquez-defensive; marquez always waiting for pacquiao to initiate. Pacquiao-champ and marquez-challenger. marquez should fight as he wants to grab the fight. Indeed, its very hard for manny to KO marquez coz always backtracking/backpedalling. When pacquiao as challenger HE KO ALL THE CHAMPS--LEDWABA, BARRERA, MORALES, DIAZ,HATTON, COTTO, MARGARITO(EXCEPT 17LBS BIGR). ALL OF THEM HAD BEEN KO. THANKS

  • thumbs up rousey.

  • Did you watch that radio interview last Sat in VA where Floyd himself said he's fighting in Feb next year and still looking for an opponent, but he never mentioned Pacquiao as his opponent. Ellerbe and GBP said that Floyd wants to fight Pacquiao on May 5 last week, yet last Sat Floyd denied it. Another deception by Mayweather?

  • First time i saw it i was like every1 else, thought marquez got robbed

    watched it a second time without the crowd screaming after pretty much every throw marquez threw hit or miss, and no ring announcers. It made a difference. i had it 115-113 for pac.

    round 5 was the best for marquez, he landed good shots. besides that, eh, it was pretty much 2-4 clean shots between pac peppering marquez's face per round. thats why his faced looked like he overdosed on botox at the end of the fight.

  • I watched this on TV and I thought Marquez won as well by a point or 2.

    HOWEVER, when i rewatched this fight with sound *OFF*, amazingly I can understand how the judge scored it for Pacquiao. I came up with 2 scores:

    1. Pac wins by 1

    2. Pacwins by 4

    In other words I change my opinion and I believe Pacquio won. It was close but he won.

    Also I felt Pacquiao was a *BETTER* boxer than before and has definately improved. Conclusions of decline are way premature. I'm actually impressed by Pac!

  • @midlc88 And for the record I'm neither hispanic or from the philippines. I repeat again, Just watch the fight again. Our initial viewing is biased by our expectations before fight, that Pac would just walk over Marquez and over power him. So as a result Pac performance looks so "bad" to even say he lost. Couple that with Marquez putting on a hell of a performance better than any one expected... then first viewing it looks like clear Marquez win. Remove the bias then you will see. Its a Pac win.

  • @midlc88 "Also I felt Pacquiao was a *BETTER* boxer than before and has definately improved. Conclusions of decline are way premature. I'm actually impressed by Pac!"

    Spot on man, Pac fought and beat him in JMM's own style of fighting. As well as Marquez countered Pac, if you watched it very closely, JMM got tagged by Pac's own right hand counters. Pac definitely improved as a boxer.

  • Pacquiao landed 178 to marquez 134. Was far more aggresive. Marquez was only countering one punch at a time! IF UR IN A RACE IT DOESNT MATTER IF U WIN BY AN INCH OR 3 FT. A WIN IS A WIN!!!!. manny fought harder than jmm did. If u want the champs belt u need to take it! Marquez did great but not enough! Manny won simple as that. Threw more landed more. Everyone stop crying. Facts r there

  • Marquez is really like a kryptonite to Superman Pacquiao. Pacquiao is best to forward fighters but not to counter puncher like Marquez or Mayweather. Pacquiao needs to listen to Roach and analyze his mistake. Compubox and judges both scored high for Pacquiao. We must agree to this even though we know that Marquez threw the more hard punches. He lost because he threw less punches and did not show the aggression like Manny.

  • Yea another white that thinks that pac really won the fight just cause he was the agresor! He says that pac won just cause pac is noy mexican thats why this white deffend pac! Other videos that i have seen about this puerto ricans, african americans, mexicans you know! They say that marquez won and the other hand the white dudes they give the fight to pac just cus marqhez is mexican so fuk those racist bitches!

  • U a fool.. You are the same dude that said Manny will beat Floyd.. Why was it easy for Floyd to beat Marquez and Manny was crying in his corner at the end of the fight?

  • hmm too bad you disapoint me rerousey. i used to like your vids and respect your opinions. but to have pacquiao winning this fight is just plain bad judging. watch the fight again and look at CLEAN PUNCHING not INEFFECTIVE AGgRESION or punches missed.

  • Comment removed

  • @karpathiian The minority that included the judges. I am glad my channel has given you the opportunity to whine. Thanks for watching.

  • For all of u Pacman fans who think Marquez deserved to lose because he wasn't the aggressor, go watch some classic footage Muhammad Ali and see if he was the aggressor in his fights.

    Counter punching is a fundamental part of boxing, u can win a fight backing up or moving away the entire time. If u think only aggressors should win fights u must think Ali (who danced around the ring and created the rope-a-dope) was a loser. Marquez chose to fight going backwards and did it well.

  • Comment removed

  • @Adrianology101

    you have a point bro... but Ali dominantly jabs while boxing backward.. Marquez does not.. and everytime Ali hits a backpedalling jabs his opponents gets groggy... Marquez didnt hurt Pacman at all... he got a clean face except for the cut caused by headbutt.. and it was not agression BUT EFFECTIVE AGGRESSION.. and Pacman been aggressive EFFECTIVELY, meaning he landed MOST POWER PUNCHES for being aggressive.. and not just aggressive for nothing..

  • Comment removed

  • @Rerousey

    You're right dude. A dwarf hurting a giant is something amazing. That every hit by a dwarf seems spectacular in the eyes of the other but the giant doesnt feel any hurt at all. bcoz of this, they tend to judge the match as a whole and tend to forget the proper way of scoring.. Didnt Marquez was claiming he won the first 2 fights and got robbed? So why did he listened to his coach that they are leading? They want it to be judged by score? And leave it to the judges again? Thats stupid.

  • TAKE THE BAIT FLOYD!

  • @Adrianology101 dude, there's a huge difference in you argument that marquez should win bcoz of his fighting style he choose to fight last saturday. ALI and Marquez style is not the right way to compare and judge who won the fight. Marquez was the challenger, and Pacman is the champion. Even though it was a close fight the challenger didn't make any risk to attack and win by convincingly to impress the judges- while Pacman was the more aggressive fighter throughout the fight.

  • @Adrianology101 ali wins because he connected more.read the ten point system.

  • Terrible. Make sure before you record you get the fighter's name correct. Also aggression shouldn't win a fight, clear punches is suppose to win. Which is suppose to be the job of the judges. I can tell you are a Pacman fan because you used the word "clearly". The whole world would disagree that it was clear even if you do give him the victory.

  • Finally you are back. I have been missing your post fight reviews, they are always great, balance and enjoyable to watch. Godspeed to you .

  • I enjoy all your fight breakdowns! The 1st time I saw this fight, I really did believe that JMM won just on having the more explosive hits. It was definitely a chess match and upon a 2nd review, I believe Pacquiao won the fight, but barely by 2 rounds. Manny was the busier fighter, still I NEVER believed JMM would be a pushover. He's too technically sound as a counter-puncher/boxer. Pacquiao fought a smart/cautious fight. Both fighters are BEASTS! Good fight! Renegade Rousey = Awesome! =] - JD

  • well said rerousey!! you're doing awesome job!! keep it up man!!

  • marquez won dumb idiot!!!!

  • nice comment man

    

  • MARQUEZ was CHEATING during the fight!

    17 times marquez stepped on pacquiao's foot compared to two  for pacquiao! look at the link below;

    /watch?v=4v5bss1VTyY&feature=s­hare

  • If you're the challenger who is making a statement that you won the previous fight, you have to proove yourself, and be more aggressive than that. Throughout the fight Marquez is just there waiting for Pacquiao to attack.... But we have to give credit to Marquez, he was trained really well, "Stomp, Punch, stomp punch"

  • i respect ur point of view but u need to learn about oxing my friend is a profesional boxer i box to n we all see how pac man lost 8 rounds clearly marques didnt have to be agresive he use his head smart fighter he throw combinations that when u get more points 90% of ppl think he won the rest is ppl like u who dont know nothing about boxing like u say u feel like he pac man won but for ppl who knows about boxing we all know he los the fight marquez was way better n it was the big stealth ever

  • I saw this watch?v=BVV0x9TAD1Y

  • @adrianology101, this was not obvious on the first 2 fights

  • i think, so many people got too spoiled by manny pacquaio.. that he always win by knocking out his opponents, no doubt marquez is a great boxer and the best mexican fighter in my opinion, but.... he didn't fight like he wants to take the belt, people should stop joking themselves of saying marquez won the fight...nacho beristain not only fooled marquez that he's winning the fight but also fooled a lot of people,try watching it in slowmo u'll see who won..u people score it

  • I agree w/ you bro...

  • Pacquiao should be given agression points if he uses it effectively. However, Marquez nullified Pac left hook & he set the pace of the fight. So the judges shouldn't give Pac points for that. The fight in its totallity catered to Marquez style. This is Boxing, the agressor shouldn't get points for simply being agressive unless he uses it effectively. The fight wasn't a brawling fest, so the judges were wrong in that regard or anybody who says otherwise.

  • In close figths like these, the guy who's style dictated the fight & waas able to nullify their opponents offense or impose their will offensely should be the victor. Marquez should of won, because the fights catered to Marquez counter-punch style. They can't simply give Paac the decision because he's the agressor. Haad he used it effectively then yes, but that wasn't the case. Maarquez kept Pac at bay, & nullified his left aswell. Fight should go to Marquez.

  • Just tuned in to hear your thoughts again.

    I agree with everything you said. Everything. You nailed my sentiments right on the head.

    Pacquiao won. It was really close, though. And Marquez' corner got themselves swayed by the crowd. Pacquiao won. I've been a big fan of Marquez for a very long time and he's really turning me off by the whining.

  • @rerousey Boxers have styles. Marquez style is to counter thats where his skill is. Paquiao is aggressive by style but this shows that Paquiao can not overmatch Marquez. He has beat bigger guys but this smaller guy handled him with pure skill and even tho Paquiao was the Champion coming to the fight but these guys have previous fights that have been close so it was more about who can beat who. Marquez is a better smarter boxer.

  • Anyone noticed marquez stepping on manny's foot? Done multiple times

  • @metallinic When left-handed fighters (Pacquiao) fight right-handed fighters (Marquez) it's extremely common for their front feet to get tangled. Its completely accidental and not unusual.

  • marquez is a great counter fighter thats why pac cant execute his killier punch,but it doestnt mean his not accurate? the truth is he land more punches than marquez,many people didnt see that cause its to fast and he can connect in a short distance,why marquez punch more appriciative than pac,cause it landed clear,but it is not enough to make him win cause pac is really a head in landing,connecting punches,just look at marquez face? you must be the agresor to win the fight.if u want smtng 2 prv

  • Pacquiao win clearly. Pacquiao pressing the fight more agressive. marquez counter puches only. fight a this magnitude marquez have too come out more agressive but he didn't espcially late round......i wouldn't be surprise if pacquiao come out beat maywheather this fight pacquiao trying to lure maywheather to sign the fight if he look explosive with marquez. maywheather wouldn't want any of that....now mayhweather reconsidering fight pacquiao....

  • this guy is a joke you will give a fight to a fighter that was aggresive but got counterpunch all day? next thing you know this guy thinks pac can still be mayweahter, not after this fight.

  • The fight was tied at the 10th, manny knew this and did all he could to win 11&12 which is y he won the fight, 115-113 Manny, dont worry tho floyd will avenge u

  • please see FOOT STOPPER TRICK BY JMM>>cheater

  • just because he was the aggressor it doesnt mean he won the fight, he was coming forward but missing, marquez gave him a boxing masterclass all this bullshit about he wasnt the champion and needed a knockout is the biggest load off crap ive heard where is the reward for using his boxing skills? manny was hitting fresh air all night and marquez was countering everyone picked pacman to win inc me be man enough to admit you got it wrong like everyone did, the decision was a disgrace to boxing

  • Marquez's gameplan cost him dearly. Him and his corner should have known better. To be the challenger and to have a gameplan of just backing off and just waiting to counter-punch is a misguided plan. Especially in this kind of a fight. Marquez is a victim of his own doings.

    This is not Olympic amateur boxing, this is Professional boxing.

    It was razor thin close fight I would admit, but at the end of day if its an even fight, the determining factor is who was the aggressor.

  • rerousy what audio and video gears are you using its so clear?

  • @xblueps,that's what happens when a lefty fights a righty. U don't know a thing about boxing.

  • watch the fight replay. Marquez aint a clean fighter. He stepped on Pacman's foot 7 times! Go and figure

  • I am filipino & I admire marquez for giving pacquiao a hard time on the ring. As a spectator, I can agree to give the win to marquez for his brilliant acuracy & timing. But I don't think that the promoter or the commission will declare marquez as winner simply because of a small margin. Let me ask you this, When pacquiao fought barrera the SUPERSTAR & the PRIZE FIGHTER the 1st time, do you think pacquiao will win against barrera if he didn't knocked him out? No, because barrera is a STAR & MONEY

  • according to punchstats pacquiao landed more power punches than marquez right. So are you talking about super power punches or what? Bottom line pacquiao was the busier fighter and he controlled the fight. If marquez landed so many of those power shots why didnt pacquiao get cut, he had issues with his right eye in the last marquez fight right? Volume punching counts, thats who is dictating the fight... Why do you think paul williamns had so many wins early in his carrer

  • omg...you people that think marquez won are idiots...first of all make manny miss did you guys see marquez's face after...red and swollen...what was wrong with mannys face nothing ok now the stats...manny threw about 150 more punches...manny landed more power shots and his percentage of hits landed were more than marquez...if you see the stats its all there...you fuckin pacquiao haters keep hating

  • MAYWEATHER VS MORALES ON MAY 12, 2012

  • very good analysis. i was actually a victim of my own expectations. after the fight, at first i thought marquez won on a close decision but when i watched it again and set aside my expectations, i was convinced pacquiao clearly won. marquez had his chances, on the later rounds, he went to being conservative. should he been that aggressive enough to win round 12, it should have been a draw.

  • Correct. =)

  • I am a Filipino and as a Boxing fan, I believe that Floyd Mayweather is P4P Best in the world. If Pacquiao does not improve by the time he gets a rematch with Marquez or a big fight with Floyd, he is going to get humiliated.

  • @DonJuanDeLaCruz i'm pretty sure you're a meixcan

  • @tdusffx I am Filipino dumbass. Check my page.

  • I agree you mate, challenger must be the aggressor

  • @rollynapa I disagree guys. What does it mean to be an aggressor. I think you guys have a forget what boxing is about, but its the society we live in today. they want to see agression, blood and guts. Marquez doesn't believe he's a challenger for one. If he was aggressive it wouldn't have been his style. EFFECTIVELY, Marquez won the fight on boxing. Making the guy miss, landing clean effective punches, using great footwork to avoid punches. In that fight I would have rather been Marquez by far.

  • i agree with the analysis.. if you are a challenger, you would normally be the aggressor. obviously Marquez here was not. You dont just take the belts, you should grab it from the champion.

  • Let me just think about this logically.

    The first two fights were virtually even right? Could have gone either way...

    in this 3rd fight pacquiao clearly didnt do as well in the previous two fights....

    and jmm clearly did better than he did in the previous two fights.

    So how does pac come out with a more decisive victory than the previous two fights?

    And by the way no disrespect but being more aggressive in a fight doesnt mean anything. The criteria is "EFFECTIVE" aggression

  • ur dumb

  • In "Boxing"judges tend to favor the fighter who controls and proposes the fight, not the one who is simply counter punching. If you are going to counter punch then dont get hit, that's how mayweather always does it. Pacquiao threw and landed more punches, how can you not notice that marquez's face took more punishment after the fight.

  • u want the dick of Paquiao !

  • Comment removed

  • Now here's one smart fight analyzer. Spot on man. The last 3 or 4 rounds Marquez coasted. I would blame Nachos for losing the fight for Marquez.

  • Good analysis rerousey

  • good vid man. Good points, Paquiao was the agressor and controlled most of the fight. If marquez really thought that pacquiaos punches didnt hurt him then why didnt he take more chances, he said he was going to leave everything on the line and he didnt.Look at pacquiaos face and look at marquez's face after the fight, how can anyone say marquez landed the cleaner blows.im mexican and i still think pacquiao won. What does anyone think about Mosley Vs. Marquez?

  • @tbuenro Look at Marquez & look at Pacquiao's? Pacquiao had more damage, what are you talking about?! This is "Boxing" the technical figther should of won this one, not the slugger.

  • @tbuenro - You do know that some people cut and bruise easier than others right? Watch the fight again and see how many times Pacquiao's head gets snapped back from a Marquez punch. That whiplash is a symptom of a clean punch. Marquez landed more of those punches than Pacquiao.

  • I had Marquez winning by 4 points. I gave 117-113 for Marquez.

  • Even as a Manny Pacquiao fan, i think Marquez did well. But i do still believe Pacquiao edged out a win. The real twist is that so many ppl expected Pacquiao to knock him out, so ppl were disappointed bc it wasn't the spectacular win they've come to expect from Pacquiao.

  • dammmmmm gringo you are really stupid!!!

  • You do have good points, nice vid. Responce

  • Pacquiao had just a 117-100 edge in power shots landed , while Marquez landed the cleaner shots. Pac was busier, averaging 49 punches thrown per round to 36 per round for Marquez.

  • Pacquiao Clearly won this I am an amateur boxer.Styles make fights these two will have a similar fight no matter how many times they fight. BUT Every boxer knows in order to take the title for from the champ you need to beat the champ. Manny Pressed the fight and actually made it a fight. not to mention that he landed nearly more punches and power punches. The fight was close JMM is a tremendous fighter with great technique but still fell a little short in the end.

  • Was the pace of the fight as fast as Pacquiao would have liked it? No.

    Did Pacquiao land his combinations? No.

    Was Pacquiao able to hit Marquez with straight left hands? No.

    Did Marquez control the pace of the the fight? Yes.

    Was Marquez able to make Pacquiao miss? Yes.

    Did Marquez counterpunch effectively? Yes.

    Pacquiao clearly couldn't do what he wanted to do while Marquez did everything he wanted to do. How could possibly give Marquez less than 6 rounds when he is dictating the fight.

  • @Adrianology101 marquez was not dictating the fight lmao. How is backing up more than 70% of the fight "dictating the fight" lol.......

  • @waterflowzz U mean backing up to avoid punches then come right back with counters? Do u even know what a counterpuncher is?

  • @Adrianology101 Marquez did not control the pace of the fight, what are you talking about. Marquez did land the showier punches, but Pac landed more, and when neither fighter hurts the other, the one who landed more will win the rounds. If it wasnt Pac and JuanMa fighting, no one would have a problem with the decision. Marquez was backpedaling the whole time. And in the championship rounds Marquez did not do anything, no one landed a significant punch but Pac was aggressive

  • @Adrianology101 Lewis vs Holyfield was a robbery...Whitaker vs. Chavez was a robbery...This fight was not..

  • @Adrianology101 5-10 years from now, when all the heat and excitement over these current fighters are over, we will watch this fight again on youtube and we all would say.."Hey, that decision wasn't bad after all"

  • @Adrianology101 lol maybe marquez punched his own face to look like that, and the crowd is overeacting even JMM's punches missed lol

  • @br00ms- I didn't know judges score fights by looking at a boxers face, I always though it had something to do with rounds. It would be misleading since some people bruise easier than others. The Majority of boxing experts and fans who aren't Filipino either gave the fight to Marquez or a called it a Draw, but none of them claimed Pacquiao won decisively.

  • @Adrianology101

    So experts think its a draw, let me ask you this do judges usually give a draw on fights like this? I think not, they usually favor the champ not the challenger....

  • @promilemac Actually one judge, Robert Hoyle, scored the fight 114-114, which is a draw. Judges score fights round by round so draws can happen unintentionally in any fight. A Judge is suppose to be objective and fair in how they score a fight. A Judge should have no bias, if they do they're corrupt.

  • @Adrianology101 PROOF that Marquez is CHEATING to get points => watch?v=ycLnpJGChvw

  • @brennaregan Damn!

  • estas echo un imbecil gringo ciego marquez gano bien no sabes nada de boxeo carechimba