After initializing and parametrizing hundreds of unknown factors,inserting divergent proxy data and ignoring any difficult natural forcing factors,we ran hundreds of simulations until we obtained the results we wanted–an ensemble of meaningless projected results,which we then averaged. We utilized the liberally unprincipled component method to homogenize and sensitize this to produce a new hockey stick,which gave a very robust prediction (95% probability) that we are totally screwing all of you
Bad luck Colin, your long term beachside investment strategy was just a little too ambitious in Blackburn. And of course I miss out also, being just around the corner in Nunawading.
It is a clear indictment of our agenda driven "main stream media", that the only place that an intelligent counter argument to AGW can be presented is via YouTube. Why if the science is so settled is there such resistance to airing of these concerns. The actions that are proposed are extreme and the roll on effects vast. It therefore stands to reason that all available view points and all evidence should be examined thoroughly.
Keep up the great work and bring on a Royal Commission!!
Although the production values are low, the presentation is lengthy (15 mins) and a little stilted, and the graphics non-existent, the arguments are sound and have worked in person and I trust will work on YouTube.
Hopefully, every person will send this on to ten others. This will constitute a significant chain reaction and send in viral (in the modern lingo)
The word 'conclusive' and definite' have never been used in any IPCC report.
They say 'high probability' of AGW.
If a doctor tells me that smoking will increase my chances of lung cancer why should I disbelieve him?
Similarly, if eight trillion cars are on the road and there's no trees or algae left to absorb the CO2, why should I disbeliieve the scientist who says a shotgun might be kinder?
"There's always an interest in the annual temperature numbers and on a given year's ranking, but usually that misses the point," said James Hansen, the director of GISS. "There's substantial year-to-year variability of global temperature caused by the tropical El Niño-La Niña cycle. But when we average temperature over five or ten years to minimize that variability, we find that global warming is continuing unabated."
After initializing and parametrizing hundreds of unknown factors,inserting divergent proxy data and ignoring any difficult natural forcing factors,we ran hundreds of simulations until we obtained the results we wanted–an ensemble of meaningless projected results,which we then averaged. We utilized the liberally unprincipled component method to homogenize and sensitize this to produce a new hockey stick,which gave a very robust prediction (95% probability) that we are totally screwing all of you
1000frolly 1 week ago
there is no anthropogenic global warming it is about giving control over to the U.N
deeunitt 5 months ago
The "Australian Sovereignty Party" supports The CSP And hope one day to work together..
ASPAustralia 1 year ago
Peoples egos will not admit that there are other peoples opinions on many matters. I welcome this discussion!!!
brianfknight 1 year ago
It's a pity that AGW is all crap. I was looking forward to having a beachside property in Blackburn! ;-)
COLINJELY 1 year ago
@COLINJELY
Bad luck Colin, your long term beachside investment strategy was just a little too ambitious in Blackburn. And of course I miss out also, being just around the corner in Nunawading.
Chris D
sirchristopherdawson 1 year ago
It is a clear indictment of our agenda driven "main stream media", that the only place that an intelligent counter argument to AGW can be presented is via YouTube. Why if the science is so settled is there such resistance to airing of these concerns. The actions that are proposed are extreme and the roll on effects vast. It therefore stands to reason that all available view points and all evidence should be examined thoroughly.
Keep up the great work and bring on a Royal Commission!!
Emersonfan100 1 year ago
@Emersonfan100
Thanks Emersonfan100!
Although the production values are low, the presentation is lengthy (15 mins) and a little stilted, and the graphics non-existent, the arguments are sound and have worked in person and I trust will work on YouTube.
Hopefully, every person will send this on to ten others. This will constitute a significant chain reaction and send in viral (in the modern lingo)
Regards
Chris D
sirchristopherdawson 1 year ago
2.
The word 'conclusive' and definite' have never been used in any IPCC report.
They say 'high probability' of AGW.
If a doctor tells me that smoking will increase my chances of lung cancer why should I disbelieve him?
Similarly, if eight trillion cars are on the road and there's no trees or algae left to absorb the CO2, why should I disbeliieve the scientist who says a shotgun might be kinder?
TheElasticJesus 1 year ago
@TheElasticJesus
So you have no objection to a Royal Commission?
sirchristopherdawson 1 year ago
@sirchristopherdawson
none at all.
TheElasticJesus 1 year ago
Let's see if this man believes in free speech -
--
"There's always an interest in the annual temperature numbers and on a given year's ranking, but usually that misses the point," said James Hansen, the director of GISS. "There's substantial year-to-year variability of global temperature caused by the tropical El Niño-La Niña cycle. But when we average temperature over five or ten years to minimize that variability, we find that global warming is continuing unabated."
FROM GISS (NASA)
TheElasticJesus 1 year ago
@TheElasticJesus
So you have no objection to a Royal Commission?
sirchristopherdawson 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheElasticJesus 1 year ago