Awesome Air Race Stunt!!!

[professoralbano]

It was on Discovery

[jallen6969]

that had to be chuck norris flying that!!

[MrKrysto6]

fake :D



[daguy1234]

watch?v=naSZBdJoEbM&NR that's a "Behind the scenes video"

[8bennugent]

ive meet people who thought this was real wtf

[zottypotty1]

Great fake! Well done!

[checkCZECHitOUT]

fake

[ccsecond]

lol plane got a new paint job while flying too. fail!

[Th3zios96]

fake... but not bad :D

[nutkinscrat]

was on uk tv. proved it was a model plane, different colours on nose. GOOD BUT FAKE

[allhailrat]

Proved to be fake on the tv show Is This Possible?

Fail.

[spareful]

extreamly faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk­kkkkkeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee fake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!

[LeetKrew090]

what a gay fake lol

[RetroBanana84]

FAKE AND GAY

[detha123456789]

~c=3 HOLY CRAP THART WAS fake!!!



[747LufthansaPilot]

a german tv show made this fake

[cache505]

Fake. Why not have both wings break off, and then the wheels fall off ,and the engine drops out and THEN it lands safely!! LOL!!!

[MrSchluffi]

Wow! A good Fake! very good

[hyperweirddudewithu]

why would u wast ur time one that

so fake

[Daviduzz90]

ahahahah...Stupid FAKE!!!

[Livingreciever]

that was terrible attept of CG

[GTAmyths94]

This is a fake. In the German television Pro 7 they showed how they made it. They've made an homepage too, does anyone know how it's called.

Weiß jemand noch wie die homepage von Pro 7 zu diesem tema heist? Die hatten ja auch den Piloten gefaket

[playernl2]

I know it's fake... but if the wing would brake off, the plane would spin in the opposite direction

[igenther99]

yep it is fake probably a rc plane

[Nickbreaker1]

haha i like 3d modelz

[Bobsucks34]

its a fake...the real one the pilot died....

[bugattigrandsport]

pumpin plane lol! xD fake

[smitty9997]

Who the hell cares if its fake its freakin funny...

[cafefavorito]

hahahahaha

[TRUTHSHALLMAKEYOUFRE]

fake

[dojanggirl13]

its an rc hellocopter

[bd5789b5f]

fake but cool

[AtlantiXYL]

but what kind camera tracking is this?????

[leimi111]

galileo hats nachgemacht

[jpwc1971]

I know it's a fake but great fake,

[NaFenn12]

fake video is fake

[planb1200]

well done fake^^

[CaptainPlanetcpf]

It is definitely fake , but very well done

[GeroWannaKeks]

galileo xDD

[StuffedDom]

fake, at the end the graphics are terrrible

[mozzmann]

Complete and utter fake, the CGI replacement is ridicules to the point that if a real Aircraft smacked the ground like that the tail wheel alone would collapse let alone the mains.

If you look closely you will see an oval shaped transparency shadow occupied the space where the aircraft is. the control surfaces are no where near where I would expect them to be to achieve ANY sort of stability.

Given these aircraft can be trailered the wing can be separated and so would have a fuel breakaway.

[StuffedDom]

yeh, and when i say terrible there good but noticable

[tatatox80]

if a real plane lost its wing there would be no control + an accelerated stall = crash.

[oggybodoggy]

and fuel loss

[tatatox80]

yes offcourse, the fuel is stored in the wing so if you lost it, there could an explosion too..

[skikimo]

You people cant tell fake from real... i was at this show FYI...

[planb1200]

shut tha fuck up this is a fucking fake

*photoshoped*

[skikimo]

shut tha fuck up hahaha u is worthless talking thru a damn comp like that... would love to see u on the street u white trash... Its not fake.. u probably r but NOT FAKE.. was there and u werent u fucking tard.. learn to grow some fucking balls stop talking shit thru a computer..

[planb1200]

what? this vid is a fucking fake you fagot !

[peuknee]

Your grammar skills are a disgrace to your country. Try and act like you have at least made it through grade school. You sound like a complete fool....I guess you are if you thought this video is real.

[Bagels108]

on Dogfights a B-17 lost half of its empennage, making it home and landing with differential engine control instead of rudders. Good stuff.

[tidis78]

fukking fake forever what ever you say

[powerbreak11]

yiha Ilove galileo fakes

[knarleysurfer54]

This isn't fake lol I love the knife edge before the land!

[mtyboltar]

Good job but totally FAKE...You can tell by the start of the vid and the amount of space between the killathrill decal and the tail and then look again at the end of the vid...

[mossdee]

So fake! Hahaha

[dwarflord812]

FAKE FAKE FAKE

[ericsharesvideo]

however, it could be possible

An f15 or 14, dont remember landed only with one wing during the early stages of the war

[Shitcuntz]

its real. look at all the rudders. there in all the right positions so it makes sence. i say its real and fukin awsome

[skateteampiss]

this guy did

[Rolandhinio]

That game had a really nice quality lol

[harveyh504]

yea its real, the pilot was ace, it was just a stunt though not a accident

[olivrig83]

if it's real......this pilot is an ace

[6bonsctt]

definatly fake look at the landing!

[skateteampiss]

yea, totaly fake. the wheels are round and all. look at all those things that dont realy happen like the plane having a shadow

[ccubsfan94]

the wheels are encased in that drop figure to lessen drag you tardface

[ricardotheretardo]

youre fucking spot on there bro the bounce was shitty enough alright

[onebadassspoiti]

look it is easy to tell its fake from the parts were they fuced up the physics of it the begining is some what real and hin losing the wing looked ok but the landing was full of it its posible with a model plane/glider but its like yall said too many gees for the pilot and the plane could not take a landing like that. sound affects were pretty good though

[aleks1warham1artist]

animated. first , the bounce, cant happen. too many gees for pilot and too much pressure on gear. second, the flight,again, pilot cant handle soooo many gees

[snozdog]

Fake? Realyy? No shit Sherlock...

[icaroff]

Fake to the bone.

[sdrfgvrfgvsfravgdsvS]

very bad

the plane turns in the incorrect dicertion when loses the wing haha

[darkshap33]

yeah.. just a stupid animatd video

[Corzsair25]

so fake

[bigvolgin]

the first part could be real, i've seen a rc modelplane in the same trouble and the pilot landed it on it's side safety. it is possible.

[Nikdiver1234]

That right in the german tv show galileo they showed how they made this fake but its really cool^^

[zed9111]

So fake but still preety neat

[sepppel9]

Galileo hat das gemacht ihr depp

en

[leimi111]

FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE

[montedjuro]

No this is real. I have look that on TV.

[leimi111]

I had watched that on TV in Galileo

Thats a Fake

[Fait2]

Wow on TV so that makes it real? I have a bridge and some land for sale, just for you!

[twistedyogert]

@leimi111 yes but how was it done?

[7261635]

its obviously real 6bonsctt you fuckin dumbass ur tryin to sound smart but your not

[cruelangeltesis]

what softwares are those? 3dmax? maya? nice work.

[422christian]

This video is from GALILEO(A GERMAN TV SHOW),it is really a fake!!!!!!!!

hehehehe!!!

They show it last week in the TV,how they do it!!!!!GAAAAAAAAAAALIIIIIIIIII­LEEEEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!­!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[NoFearNoGutsNoGlory]

Is that real or fake??? !!!

[6bonsctt]

tell me, how many landings in REAL airplanes have you seen on youtube? None of them bounce like that! that is as fake as it gets.they start off with a real airplane, move the camera away, then show the rest off the simulator, they are not even the same stripe color on the airplane.

[Th3d4rk355]

you really need to use your eyes...

[ustasaaa]

I'm constantly amazed how many people can't see obvious speciall effects on You tube!! If you're here to watch videos than W-A-T-C-H!!! Damnit.

[ndawsome]

dude thats not fake thats real

[Crazylogie]

FAKE

[ianrose666]

I'm going to spell it out for you, in nice, easy, simple terms that you will understand. I was originally trying to point out your use certain terms were not correct int the context used. This whole thread was started about flying, not science. So who is using the correct terminology? Not you. But you couldn't see that. You argue with a pilot, telling him what the correct terminology is??? Thats not pointing out a mistake, thats being ignorant. I give you the police as an example of context...

[ianrose666]

And all you could do was then say everyone who doesnt use the physics terms is idiots. I used the example of arcs to show you the difference between distance and displacement which is what you looked like you were talking about with change in position, etc, and all you can do is attack all over again. What you really not seem to realise is, I have been replying to all you say, not instigating it.

[ianrose666]

Lets just leave it at this. We are going round in circles, and no-one else is interested. We agree to disagree on some things, and agree on others.

Its definately a fake tho!

[onjoFilms]

Fake as hell.

[darkNeo1992]

That is a fake Video from Germany. The Video is Uploaded first by a Television broadcasting station, called Galileo. They worked on with specalists for Effects.

Sry for the word mistakes.^^

[ThomasPeitl]

Fake from Galileo xD

the flight looks quite real but the landing shows that it is a fake

[dannymatt22]

m8, i don't have a problem with you wanting to be educated in physics cos i respect you guys who can understand it cos i don't get it at all and because of physics we get nice stuff like planes. The only thing i thought was stupid was you guys sayin stuff like 'agree with yourself' and' Christ, it's so hard talking to you'. I didn't see how u were helping yourselves by bein so abusive.

As for the whole 'dannymatt' bein a niggerap thing, i have no idea, that's jus what i get called at school.

[ianrose666]

Dannymatt22, don't take any notice of agadharg. He obviously never learned social skills at school. Your completely right with your comment on our comments, but I dont think he would agree on that either...

[19969111]

so damm fake

[Ilgxon]

This video is put in the internet by "galileo" (german knowledge-programm) for an experiment...to show how a buzz can extend.

[kiler2death]

its Computer graphics, very bad computer graphics, im 15 and i do alot of this, very bad, U FAIL

[neil694]

class

[austinpowers1977]

its fake nothing more nothing less!

[MrRangerTom]

Snopes debunks this video is false.

[MrRangerTom]

Imagine being a cameraman on foot trying to keep up with this aircraft to keep it in an amazing close up parallel shot for 10 seconds. Heck, he could hardly keep it on the plane when it was high in the air. I'm persuaded that most of the final moments of this video are CGI. Although I've seen RC models do this trick, I have yet to see one pulled off so smoothly.

[apek445566]

it looks like a fake vid

[ianrose666]

Christ, this is so hard talking to you. I refered to what you were talking about as change in position, ie displacement, and how it is a vector. I then point out what I was refering to in the first place, ie distance d, a scalar product. They are not the same in any way, nor have I said that. I have done nothing bar point out the DIFFERENCE! Change in position can be in 3 dimensions, distance is not. Vector does not equal scalar, that is basic physics, you should know this!

[ianrose666]

p2-p1 can be smaller than the distance actually travelled, therefore NOT FULLY EXPLAINED by the equation s*t=p2-p1. This is my point, distance is a defined product of s*t. Its just not as complicated as you show, its as easy as I show. You are talking from the standpoints of vectors, I talk about the scalar. You talk of delta position, NOT ME!

[compynick]

Hi,

it is an model plane! A friend of me flew the plane - you can find it also in the internet by powermodellbau (.) da

[ianrose666]

The word is CONTRADICT. Obviously english is not your strong point...

At "high school" they teach you that distance is speed multiplied by time. As you progress through school, and through to university in physics, you start to get delta position, displacement, etc. TO START WITH ITS DISTANCE!!! Not everyone on here is university educated, this is what I am trying to say, GENERAL RUN OF THE MILL DESCRIPTIONS!!!!

"Open the book" indeed. What a presumptious comment from an arrogant nobody.

[ianrose666]

70 metres per second, for 2 seconds, makes 140 metres travelled. Thats your distance from start to finish. Basic maths. No differentiation, not need to do any change in position speach, just distance travelled. When you travel in an arc, p1-p2 would be DISPLACEMENT, ie change in position, a vector quantity. Distance is not a vector however, it is a recognised scalar quantity...

[dannymatt22]

hahaha, u losers, get a life

[ianrose666]

Gee, now that grown up reply wasn't a surprise at all...

[dannymatt22]

my bad

[ronaldofan1st]

tht looks so fake but still is quite kwl!!

[footieolly]

tht is mint!!

[ianrose666]

One reason why your p2-p1 doesnt hold water is if the distance travelled is greater than the distance between the 2 points, ie an arc. Therefore, you would use distance travelled, d.

Not displacement between 2 points, distance travelled.

Look up the 4 kinematic equations, you'll see what I mean...

[L4rs88]

its 100% fake. it was a project from a german tv show called "galileo". they made this fake video to see how it spreads in the internet...

[ianrose666]

Names Ian, not Ivan you ignorant educated numpty

[MAxileinchen1995]

100% Fake watch the landing and while flying he had an helmet while he get get out not and i think its unrealistic that someone puts his helmet off dicrectly after doing thigs like that

[ianrose666]

No, you talk of CHANGE IN POSITION, relative to anything that can move. The actual scalar denotion is distance, ie, d. Not dx, or dy. And its measured in metres. You confuse the issue with differentiation, whereas anyone else would recognise it as distance.

Seriously, i'm not going to bother with you again, all you posts just prove how you confuse the issue with jargon and irrelevant comments. Not everyone here will have an background in physics, and will regard you as irrelevant, or boring.

[xtechx]

u can see how fake it is at about 50 seconds.

[ianrose666]

d=v X t. You dont know what that is?HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!d is distance, v is velocity (X is a multiplication sign, as opposed to lower case x, a variable.) and t is time. 1st ever equation in school mate, distance is velocity multiplied by time. YOU obviously failed physics at high school, this is well before high school! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!You just proved you know NOTHING!

[kevanator34]

this is so fake i mean if the wing would fall off well the plane would start doing barrol rolls and then it would of been impossible for the pilot to get out of

[danlegoman100]

cool even though its fake

[Robik59]

it`s a BIG fake, that isn`t your VIDEO thats GALELEO fake!

[freakyfreak90]

well the flight as such was a really good fake, but when it landed you clearly saw :)

[gp1470]

This is a fake from a german tv show called galileo...

[wolfie00]

Dou you really believe that? Galileo is so crappy, they could never produce such a video. They simply saw it on youtube and put it in their show.

[josho421]

this is fake

[SensationHunter]

Just another one wing landing video...lol

[tommyitaliarf]

look how the prop stops when lands

[tommyitaliarf]

ok its a fake lol

[hernerev2007]

And apparently you cant understand the definition context. Remember me refering to the police? That would be my point, using the wrong word in a given context. I'venot said speed is not a scientific term, just not in that reference, Velocity, v, commonly defined as metres per second. As such, d=v X t. Using position? Ok, speed. Distance, its velocity. I'm not going to continue this with you, as we are argueing the same point (As I have said before.)

agadharg (vor 5 Tagen) Anzeigen Ausblenden

0 f

[fleckenstein777]

you fokers! you fokers! you....well, that was cool anyway ha!

[hernerev2007]

fake look at galileo

[tnzfki]

do not look really realistic

[alexororro]

FAKE FAKE!!!

LOOK GALILEO , BE SMART xD

They showed that this is just a fake,not real.

By the ending you see very good that it's animated

[Therwiler93]

it s a fake galileo I have see it on galileo it s a german tv programm

it s true

I swear

[ianrose666]

And apparently you cant understand the definition context. Remember me refering to the police? That would be my point, using the wrong word in a given context. I'venot said speed is not a scientific term, just not in that reference, Velocity, v, commonly defined as metres per second. As such, d=v X t. Using position? Ok, speed. Distance, its velocity. I'm not going to continue this with you, as we are argueing the same point (As I have said before.)

For the record, I have a degree in physics.

[ianrose666]

You want to call police idiots, be my guest, I certainly wouldn't.

In physics, it is velocity, never speed. Like I said, I told you about credentials in science, so dont try to teach me.

End point, I give up. Keep your bone no-one else wants, I'm tired of this.

[JFN9982]

I see it on Galileo (german soap) it is a fake!

[PelzHimself]

ne soap ? man, unser fernsehprogramm ist eh schon scheiße, lass es doch nicht noch schlechter aussehen !

[kaan008]

haha :D me too

[ianrose666]

No, maybe not altitude in feet...

...in english. Anyway, I did say 'speak', not read.

And I have already told you my science background, I know what your definaition is. Many terms are used differently to how science calls it. I dont hear of the police saying "The cars velocity was..." They say 'speed' yet we both know which one is scientifically right. My point is, not everyone in this planet speaks in science terms. HENCE THE CONFUSION!!!

[ianrose666]

I refuse to argue with a pilot what the correct definition of spin is in reference to his field of expertise. Apparently you find it hard to accept that I fully agree with your point of different people using different terms around the world. That is my point, I dont tell them what to use, I use their terms in the relevant context. So I use the pilots definition of spin in aviation, and OUR definition of spin in science contexts. Last I saw, this was a general internet site, not a science forum.

[Brunzki]

aber jeder hat es geglaubt. lol

[sm4rsch]

hehe,auf arbeit hat mir das vor 3 wochen keiner geglaubt das es ein fake is ^^ zum glück hat es prosieben heute aufgeklärt =P

sieht aber lustig aus^^

[xxxkpinoyxxx]

ja is jetzt gut wir hams alle in galileo gsehn^^

xDD is en fake :D net schlecht bearbeitet ..

aba wo das [modelflugzeug] aufkommt sieht man

eindeutig das es en fake is :D

[Scooby00815]

hat sich Galileo aber ganz schön angestrengt um einen zu verar.... löl

[Scooby00815]

will keinen neuen Kommentar aufmachen, aber wenn man genau hinschaut, ist in dem Moment, wo der Flügel abfällt, der Hintergrund um das Flugzeug heller, als der Rest des Himmels....

[2gay2play2day2]

habs auch grad eben in galileo geschaut und war echt überrascht...

[soulstripper91]

ist aber auch interessant zu sehen wie viele leute das video von galileo geklaut und einfach nochmal geposted haben ^^

[jamy234]

eben galileo geguckt xD

[grassgott]

hahahahahahhahahha zuu geil galileo roxx ^^

hätt nie gedacht das es wirklich SO viele sind =)

[p4ige]

hey das is ja mal geil^^

liebe grüße an alle galileozuschauer

[RkoLeague]

jaja Galileo hat alles gezeigt^^

alle schauen galileo^^

[Freditony]

haha... alle schauen galileo XD

[gaaiil]

FAKE

FAKE

FAKE

Hab grad GALILEO gegucht

HaHaHa

als ob euch jemand glaubt

[herati840]

ich hab auch gerade galileo geguckt die haben euch alle voll verascht

[Mey002]

Ich sagte doch fake die ganze zeit schon ehy jetzt sieht man es im tv wie ich gesagt habe 1.Die landung ist sehr unecht da ich jahr auch ein model flugzeug hatte hatte ich es germankt.

MFG MEY002

[dietNoodle]

Ich auch!! :)

[nioolix]

klar man

alle galileo geguckt^^

[Anuschboy56]

Achja ^^ auch alle grad galileo geguckt ^^ haha

[direalpatois]

das is echtmal scheiße :D habs auch grad bei galileo gesehen

[Uffschnitt]

soviel scheiße galileo auch macht, wenn ihr euch die Commis von vor ein zwei wochen durchlest is des mal übelst lustig :D

[RDDeViLJoeXx]

da sieht man mal wieviele leute galileo schauen xD

und im video nebendran wo die 3mio sind steht ab und zu mal scheiss galileo, warum schauen dies denn? xD

[samthepspuser]

WOA sieht das scheise aus :D meeega billige ausrede von galileo " wir haben den merkwürdigen sprung am ende mit absicht gemacht, dass auch was zum diskutieren da is " OMFG!!!

[mike362152]

Echt schlechte Animation!!! Gebt euch mal mehr Mühe.....

[CarlosOlivera000]

Yeah i saw it too and pro sieben xD

[cOncepT1991]

hab ich auch grad bei galileo gesehen :D

[Tritratrallatritra]

Mein Gott ist das schlecht

[pirolempacher]

des is von galileo

[SaschaK94]

mei des is galileo

[plaeumchen]

echtma..wie die auf ihren film stolz sind...

läuft ja grad bei galileo

[Onlype]

Galileo Fake :D

[b00nanza]

yea :D