120million lives were worth the price payed to keep the china intact. Were it not for Mao, the warlords would have returned and china would have suffered the same fate as yugoslavia or the ottoman empire, broken into hopelessly backwards bickering nations.
@AlternateArtisan -- Do you really think Mao was the only person who could have led China to unity and progress (such as it was)? For instance, the founder of the CCP was not Mao. It was Chen Duxiu. Why could the same or better results not have been achieved under his leadership?
@adam13weishaupt thats hard to say really, no one can truely say that anything different would have worked for sure since the events around the PRC's creation were very much a gamble. I'm just happy I have one country and not 100 waring provinces.
@AlternateArtisan. I understand. So would many former citizens of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union. By the same logic, we can be even happier when the whole world is a single country.
Chairman Mao, the greatest leader in the Asia, as for Formosa it is just a renegade bit of china. Funk hole for the landlords and lackeys watched over by a US that is slowly loosing it's influence in Asia as the force of the PLN extends it's influence beyond the third island chain. And the East (will be) Red! Red right up to the coast of California.
I'm a huge Obama supporter... but Obama aint even an ounce as good of a leader as Chairman Mao...
If it was not for Chairman Mao, China would still be a very very backwards place, and they never could have opened up to the west under Deng, without being exploited.
@seanisthelizardking How dare you even compare Barack Obama to Mao Tse-Tung, a man who cant even run the US, a hypocrite who denounced the Iraq war then sent more troops. Mao Tse-Tung a man who industrialized China, and brought it into the 20th century, through tough policies that may have hurt some but benefited many. Never Never compare an american president to Mao
Wow. That's a prime example of a totalitarian communist cult of personality. His name was in practically every line of that hymn. Long live adulation.
Sometimes I find myself wondering why so many catchy songs are made in dictatorships, e.g. 1930´s Germany & USSR. Listening to this beautiful song and watching the beautiful coreography almost make me want to join the Chinese communist party =D ...I mean who remembers any catchy political music made in democracies?
@Paska10 every government carries out propaganda and brainwashes its people. The difference for the "democracies" is that they do it more subtlely than the communist countries. Just look at all the messages Americans are parroting with the War on Terror, etc.
@tritonraider yeah but the democracies are not doing a very good job. I never got very impressed with the Bush regime propaganda for the need and efficiency of so called war on terror...perhaps they should put some composers to work to get the message in the western public, "Chinese style" you know! =7
@Paska10 IDK... but most Americans are very supportive of their troops, and genuinely believe that they are fighting for their freedom, even when all they're doing is occupying another country. I'd say that's the success of western propaganda. Once again, it's the subtleties that appear to work much better than the blatant communist ones.
@tritonraider I realize you posted this 1 year ago, but your saying, "it's the subtleties that appear to work much better than the blatant communist ones" fills me with hope. So few people realize this in our country. If only more knew the extent to which most Americans are brainwashed then, perhaps, things would be different here. Ignorance is not bliss--ignorance is slavery.
Major part of the problem??? If PRC remained Maoist it would be a poor, undeveloped country with decresing power. If PRC want to be a growing superpower, it must gave up the Maoism !! Like or not, this is the truth!
I think you are a western(or japanese or russian or indian) agent who doesn't want PRC an omnipotent superpower!!
Lol, actually I am an Anarcho-Communist who want no super powers. But as long as we deal with these super powers I would much rather have China change the balance of power a bit since the Chinese people in power would mean more people are taken care of financially(due to the fact they have the worlds most populous nation).
In the past, in the present, and in the future the stronger nations want to influence the world, like the stronger persons their social environment! This is a very natural behavior of the mankind.
I don't want to pull out anything, i just don't understand why do you defend the maoism?
The fate of LIU SHAOQI and DENG XIAOPING (+ millions of innocent chinese) shows the brutal, cynical and harmful face of this ideology. The some results what PRC achieved ( e. g. hydrogen bomb, sattelite) were thanks to ZHOU ENLAI's common sense.
I doubt you really know what maoism is. Otherwise, you wouldn't write that PRC stopped to be maoist, or, let's say marxsist, since maoism is not some kind of a separate ideas and philosophy.
Main features: radical and brutal change of the society, killing or prisoned millions of innocent people. Economical deadend wich mean severe starvations.Both mean FEAR in the whole socety (also among communist).
Is it marxism or not? This is not a prior question, it's a machiavellist practice of power managment and covered itself with ideology.
Oddly enough, no one in China ever described "Mao Zedong ideas" to be somehow related to stalinism. They are considered being developed from marxism-leninism.
And, Chinese for some reason tend to awfully disagree with you for some reason.
You are saying that it is not philosophy, but why there were so many maoist students in european and japanese riots in sixties, why there are maoist parties in Europe now (and almost no stalinist), Why are there maoist rebels throughout Asia and in India and
Nepal? And why hasn't the Chinese government ever rejected his ideas?
I doubt that you have ever read Mao, and almost sure you watched a bunch of antimao propaganda programmes and might read few books like Mao-the unknown story.
4. In the 60's the maoist PRC (+Albania) sponsored these groups but there was no stalinist SU at that time.
5. It's not necessery to reject the maoist ideology because of the roots and legitimation of CCP. It's enough to go as far as possible in practice. That's what CCP are doing since 1978.
The Chinese government has rejected his ideas. The two biggest examples would be rejecting class-struggle between 1978-80, and rejecting the Party as leadership of the peasantry with the rise of technocrats after 1976 and the Three Represents in the 1990s. Moreover, they've abandoned world revolution and the notion of revolutionary will being able to overcome historic materialism (i.e. Mao's insistence in Great Leap policies of will being able to speed up socialist transformation).
1. Stalin and Mao were close ideological allies. ("Live for 10000 years the SU-PRC friendship!") The split between the two state become during Khruschev who gave up stalinism and that was hurt Mao!
2. Fundamental paralels in methods, rethorics, and practice! Great Purge(SU)= Culture Rev.(PRC). Paralel fates:Tukhachevsky-Peng Dehuai, Buharin-Liu Shaoqi, Yezhov-Lin Biao.
3. There ARE stalinist cells in Europe but fortunatly as marginals as the maoists.
Mao considered Stalin to be a great thinker who understood Marxism Leninism very well; he is considered to be very influential. You can find references to Stalin in his writings, including at least one place where he talks about Stalin's "genius." Mao said that Stalin was 70% good, and 30% bad, so Stalin gets a passing grade from Mao. "Stalinism" is mostly a term used by Trotskyists as a perjorative, however. Hardly anyone actually identifies as a "Stalinist."
15-20 million peolple died in hunger between 1959-1962. + Culture revolution. It was a big North Korea. Since 1978 (thanks to Deng XiaoPeng) become a rising superpower!!
Are you an idiot? Taiwan(or the Republic of China) is an island. Not even a part of mainland Asia and NEVER a part of the People's Republic of China. Learn some geography idiot.
More probabably you are an idiot asshole.Who said Taiwan is a part of mainland, but isn't it a chinese territory??? (please learn more geography, and history)
You are a tipical demagouge. If somebody is not on your opinion, you become pretty nervous, and the other is idiot.
They have their own governing structures retard, the Chinese government maintains some level of control, but it is not the same as a typical PRC territory.
We speak about the past when there was no PRC control over Taiwan at all!! .There were (are) two China: ROC (not communist) there were no starvations, but political terrorr was. PRC (communist) there were severe starvations because of the irrational economic and political system (great leap forward 1958, cult. rev.1966-1973) I must repeat: Since 1978 (thanks for Deng Xiaoping and NOT for Mao) PRC become a growing superpower!!!
The cult. revolution would be more fatal and harmfull for PRC (sentenced the nuclear physicists, and missile researchers) if ZHOU ENLAI did not soften MAO's idiotism!!! Probably PRC had no hydrogen bomb at 1967, and had no satelitte at 1970.
Well, no wonder you don't understand what is maoism, since you make such statements. Taiwan was a part of Japan, and was considered by them as a core japanese (in other words, not colonial or occupied) territory, so it was an integrated part of far richer nation than China. Not to mention the Chang Kai Shek took all chinese gold reserve and funds and, well, anything he could take and of course, Taiwan was an unticommunist inflatable carrier, while China stood all alone and even isolated.
1. Maoism is a philosophy, and not some kind of economic policy. It is not an independent school either, but implementation and development of marxism. It used some fresh approach comparing to other dogmatic marxists and developed some new theories and ideas. For example, Mao stated that no revolution could lead to any other type of society than the one that is determined by the industrial progress of a country. In chinese or soviet case it was capitalism.
He launched a cultural revolution since he proposed that a permanent revolution could lead to socialism directly, and that the people could establish direct democracy instead of a party bureaucracy. However it failed to do that.
2. That it remains being their philpsophy and methodology. It determines the way they think & generate ideas, and the ideology of course, but that is secondary.
@ timfidotru, if you are chinese in race than you are a traitor. If you are japanese, than I swear in blood, before the day I die, china will unite and take revenge on Japan. Japan will no longer exist.
Call me a communist, a racisit, maoist whatever. I do not care.
My nickname obviously determines my russian origin. I still have some connections with China.
It seems though you didn't understand what I was saying in my comment above. I told nothing about the future of Taiwan, just mentioned the historical fact of the island being a japanese territory and its administrative status to indicate its wealth comming out of it.
I advise you to reread my post and understand it better. It is rather prochinese, not anti-
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hey America...this is what is coming down the pike if Obama remains in office. It's another cultural revolution, except the Red Guards will be Obama's Urban "Green" Gestapo consisting of Acorn supporters, street thugs, and legions of ignorant, obedient, and adoring inner city flunkies. Time to turn this punk out before it is too late.
The American government tricked the whole world into believing he was the hero to save the day so everybody loves the states again after Bush fucked everything up. As if it wasn't planned to do it like this all along.
Mao just was openly evil and the people got along with it.
I prefer Mao over Obama, because you could have done something against him if you want, American "leaders" are the same hypocrits and liars but with a clean suits...
Yes because the Government is one big united mass with a single overmind dictating policy and direction... they're obviously ruled by a bipartisan shadow council ¬_¬
The Republicans wanted you to vote McCain, face it... You yanks have such a backward hostility towards Governments that you'll blame them for anything ¬_¬
Who gives a rat's ass about the Bush cabinet? They're GONE (just in case you haven't noticed). You must be a liberal...always trying to change the argument. Bush and his cronies are history. Deal with the new incompoetent in DC town.
I see. Now you are trying to associate me with the former president? Your unflagging liberalness is showing. Yours is the typical lib eral response to any unflattering observation made of your beloved messiah...change the argument. There is no point attempting to argue rationally, logically or cogently with you since you can't remain true to the core issues of the debate.
Perhaps you should return to the Altar to Obama you have in your bedroom, light a few candles, and bray to the enlightened one. You'll feel better, and stop polluting youtuibe with bullshit. In case you haven't noticed, W has been gone for a long time.
BO is at the helm. Let's see how well he steers the craft.
Yeah citizens really had it worse under the DDR than Hitler... all that blasted socialised healthcare, free daycare, guaranteed housing and consumer products.... terrible.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
fuck mao. he didnt love the people at all. there were many men in the ccp that helped stop the great leap forward which in result saved millions of lives.
Mao was a man, but he was a great man, a man of many triumphs and mistakes. But he indeed changed a nation, the kind of achievements he had (and his comrades in arms - some of whom he later did indeed suppress) are so grand, it's unimaginable. They were much more substantial than some imaginable fable God of the Bible; the old generation of comrades are really "Gods" among humans.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
He was better than waht preceeded him...
But if we're gonna compare tyrants here, I'd pick Stalin over Mao for achievements...
Mao was a feudal despot with no idea over how an economic system worked... he didn't even delegate such tasks due to his amazing paranoia and arrogance, *he* had to be in control. He was no more a Communist than any other Bolsheviks, Stalinists or Maoists we've seen in the world today.
And never *ever* compare him to being a deity :-/ How is that communism?!
I am half Chinese half Guiawlow, my father is portuguese and my mother is chinese, my chinese grandfather was a landlord, he was killed and his possessions, my mother was humiliated and paraded around the streets, she migrated to Macau has a illegal migrant, and worked her way to were she is today, in capitalist macau, what did the communist party achieve? rotting out Chinas intellectuals? killing millions of its own people, my grandfather included, for what?
@portugalreis because your granpa was a reactionary. he deserved it. for all we know, your grandpa might have committed some blood debts against the poor peasants in his village :P
@portugalreis In short, your grandpa deserved to die for being a landlord.... Actually dying that way would have been better than being starved to death as a peasant.
@ubcphysicsyangbo So is the Great Leap and Culture Revolution he created. Absolute power makes a man very corrupted, so much more so on a great man; the addiction to power and worship makes a great man commit crimes 1000 times worse than corruption.
120million lives were worth the price payed to keep the china intact. Were it not for Mao, the warlords would have returned and china would have suffered the same fate as yugoslavia or the ottoman empire, broken into hopelessly backwards bickering nations.
AlternateArtisan 6 months ago
@AlternateArtisan It was 40 million and 1billion people = chinese population 1b divided by 40 milion = 1/25
killstreak88 5 months ago
@AlternateArtisan -- Do you really think Mao was the only person who could have led China to unity and progress (such as it was)? For instance, the founder of the CCP was not Mao. It was Chen Duxiu. Why could the same or better results not have been achieved under his leadership?
adam13weishaupt 5 months ago in playlist dong fang hong
@adam13weishaupt thats hard to say really, no one can truely say that anything different would have worked for sure since the events around the PRC's creation were very much a gamble. I'm just happy I have one country and not 100 waring provinces.
AlternateArtisan 5 months ago
@AlternateArtisan. I understand. So would many former citizens of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union. By the same logic, we can be even happier when the whole world is a single country.
adam13weishaupt 5 months ago
Only the cheap dump love Mao-- the most fucking garbage on earth.
mastmanageangelatsui 10 months ago
love mao ,support mao!!!!
19348 11 months ago
Chairman Mao, the greatest leader in the Asia, as for Formosa it is just a renegade bit of china. Funk hole for the landlords and lackeys watched over by a US that is slowly loosing it's influence in Asia as the force of the PLN extends it's influence beyond the third island chain. And the East (will be) Red! Red right up to the coast of California.
F4foxbravo995 1 year ago
I'm a huge Obama supporter... but Obama aint even an ounce as good of a leader as Chairman Mao...
If it was not for Chairman Mao, China would still be a very very backwards place, and they never could have opened up to the west under Deng, without being exploited.
seanisthelizardking 1 year ago 4
@seanisthelizardking How dare you even compare Barack Obama to Mao Tse-Tung, a man who cant even run the US, a hypocrite who denounced the Iraq war then sent more troops. Mao Tse-Tung a man who industrialized China, and brought it into the 20th century, through tough policies that may have hurt some but benefited many. Never Never compare an american president to Mao
GagarinCCCP 2 months ago
2:55 wow...
Aehere 1 year ago
Wow. That's a prime example of a totalitarian communist cult of personality. His name was in practically every line of that hymn. Long live adulation.
TheAbscondingOutcast 1 year ago
viva el presidente MAO TSE TUNG
Qorianka100 1 year ago
mao also had a loyalty dance - youtube "mao loyalty dance" and watch the first clip - so good :)
is2geoff 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
100岁的民国母亲在呼唤60岁的不孝子回家吧，你还想当黄俄多久呢？
chinawanker 1 year ago
frightening
gloomyoutlook 1 year ago
Beautiful, but so much...bs.
Just finished reading "Son of the Revolution." Opened my eyes about how misguided the CCP was with Mao at the helm.
draug2009 2 years ago
Misguided being an understatement :)
Sometimes I find myself wondering why so many catchy songs are made in dictatorships, e.g. 1930´s Germany & USSR. Listening to this beautiful song and watching the beautiful coreography almost make me want to join the Chinese communist party =D ...I mean who remembers any catchy political music made in democracies?
Paska10 1 year ago
@Paska10 Oh say can you see that star spangled banner yet wave, o'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.
That's a pretty sweet line from a pretty sweet song imo.
I'm not even american and I think that's a sweet song.
IncredibleManx 1 year ago
@Paska10 every government carries out propaganda and brainwashes its people. The difference for the "democracies" is that they do it more subtlely than the communist countries. Just look at all the messages Americans are parroting with the War on Terror, etc.
tritonraider 1 year ago
@tritonraider yeah but the democracies are not doing a very good job. I never got very impressed with the Bush regime propaganda for the need and efficiency of so called war on terror...perhaps they should put some composers to work to get the message in the western public, "Chinese style" you know! =7
Paska10 1 year ago
@Paska10 IDK... but most Americans are very supportive of their troops, and genuinely believe that they are fighting for their freedom, even when all they're doing is occupying another country. I'd say that's the success of western propaganda. Once again, it's the subtleties that appear to work much better than the blatant communist ones.
tritonraider 1 year ago 2
@tritonraider I realize you posted this 1 year ago, but your saying, "it's the subtleties that appear to work much better than the blatant communist ones" fills me with hope. So few people realize this in our country. If only more knew the extent to which most Americans are brainwashed then, perhaps, things would be different here. Ignorance is not bliss--ignorance is slavery.
aroguegurklis 4 months ago
Comment removed
Paska10 1 year ago
Comment removed
Paska10 1 year ago
China doesn't have to give up maoism all the way, they just have to alter parts of maoism,
crusader636 2 years ago
your greedy capitalist pigs no different from us, the only difference is the lack of democracy
portugalreis 2 years ago
Comment removed
derme262 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
中国这个国家已经不行了。空气，水都被污染，自然环境破坏严重，毒食品，到处都是骗子，没有舆论自由，不存在人权概念，愚民教育，没有研发能力，假货充斥市场，汉族没有公德，唱反调性格别扭，没有遵守法律意识，没有宽容精神，慈悲心，人与人间没有信任关系，思想极端爱国主义，很自私，嫉妒别人，猜忌心强，幸灾乐祸。中国还有存在意义吗？
etoile8848 2 years ago
China is no longer Maoist anymore is a major part of the problem. The have simply turned into another greedy Capitalist nation unfortunately.
Tsukae 2 years ago
Major part of the problem??? If PRC remained Maoist it would be a poor, undeveloped country with decresing power. If PRC want to be a growing superpower, it must gave up the Maoism !! Like or not, this is the truth!
I think you are a western(or japanese or russian or indian) agent who doesn't want PRC an omnipotent superpower!!
Xtrail121 2 years ago
Lol, actually I am an Anarcho-Communist who want no super powers. But as long as we deal with these super powers I would much rather have China change the balance of power a bit since the Chinese people in power would mean more people are taken care of financially(due to the fact they have the worlds most populous nation).
Tsukae 2 years ago
In the past, in the present, and in the future the stronger nations want to influence the world, like the stronger persons their social environment! This is a very natural behavior of the mankind.
Xtrail121 2 years ago
Are you trying to pull out some "human nature " argument?
Tsukae 2 years ago
I don't want to pull out anything, i just don't understand why do you defend the maoism?
The fate of LIU SHAOQI and DENG XIAOPING (+ millions of innocent chinese) shows the brutal, cynical and harmful face of this ideology. The some results what PRC achieved ( e. g. hydrogen bomb, sattelite) were thanks to ZHOU ENLAI's common sense.
Xtrail121 2 years ago
@Xtrail121
I doubt you really know what maoism is. Otherwise, you wouldn't write that PRC stopped to be maoist, or, let's say marxsist, since maoism is not some kind of a separate ideas and philosophy.
timfidotru 2 years ago
@timfidotru
But I'm sure you have the illusion you know what maoism is.
Xtrail121 2 years ago
May I ask what do you consider being maoism?
timfidotru 2 years ago
@timfidotru
Maoism is the far eastern version of stalinism.
Main features: radical and brutal change of the society, killing or prisoned millions of innocent people. Economical deadend wich mean severe starvations.Both mean FEAR in the whole socety (also among communist).
Is it marxism or not? This is not a prior question, it's a machiavellist practice of power managment and covered itself with ideology.
Xtrail121 2 years ago
Oddly enough, no one in China ever described "Mao Zedong ideas" to be somehow related to stalinism. They are considered being developed from marxism-leninism.
And, Chinese for some reason tend to awfully disagree with you for some reason.
You are saying that it is not philosophy, but why there were so many maoist students in european and japanese riots in sixties, why there are maoist parties in Europe now (and almost no stalinist), Why are there maoist rebels throughout Asia and in India and
timfidotru 2 years ago
Nepal? And why hasn't the Chinese government ever rejected his ideas?
I doubt that you have ever read Mao, and almost sure you watched a bunch of antimao propaganda programmes and might read few books like Mao-the unknown story.
timfidotru 2 years ago
@timfidotru
4. In the 60's the maoist PRC (+Albania) sponsored these groups but there was no stalinist SU at that time.
5. It's not necessery to reject the maoist ideology because of the roots and legitimation of CCP. It's enough to go as far as possible in practice. That's what CCP are doing since 1978.
Xtrail121 2 years ago
@timfidotru
The Chinese government has rejected his ideas. The two biggest examples would be rejecting class-struggle between 1978-80, and rejecting the Party as leadership of the peasantry with the rise of technocrats after 1976 and the Three Represents in the 1990s. Moreover, they've abandoned world revolution and the notion of revolutionary will being able to overcome historic materialism (i.e. Mao's insistence in Great Leap policies of will being able to speed up socialist transformation).
TylerCo79 1 year ago
@timfidotru
You are WRONG!!
1. Stalin and Mao were close ideological allies. ("Live for 10000 years the SU-PRC friendship!") The split between the two state become during Khruschev who gave up stalinism and that was hurt Mao!
2. Fundamental paralels in methods, rethorics, and practice! Great Purge(SU)= Culture Rev.(PRC). Paralel fates:Tukhachevsky-Peng Dehuai, Buharin-Liu Shaoqi, Yezhov-Lin Biao.
3. There ARE stalinist cells in Europe but fortunatly as marginals as the maoists.
Xtrail121 2 years ago
Mao considered Stalin to be a great thinker who understood Marxism Leninism very well; he is considered to be very influential. You can find references to Stalin in his writings, including at least one place where he talks about Stalin's "genius." Mao said that Stalin was 70% good, and 30% bad, so Stalin gets a passing grade from Mao. "Stalinism" is mostly a term used by Trotskyists as a perjorative, however. Hardly anyone actually identifies as a "Stalinist."
WG164 2 years ago
現在西方紅 (美國)
lezlie2k2 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
毛贼把中华民族变成了马列子孙，罪恶滔天的共惨党把中国人变成五毛，被洗脑的丑陋中国人。
chinawanker 2 years ago
He never thought he was a god. He did many great things for the people of China.
Tsukae 2 years ago
Many great things???
15-20 million peolple died in hunger between 1959-1962. + Culture revolution. It was a big North Korea. Since 1978 (thanks to Deng XiaoPeng) become a rising superpower!!
Xtrail121 2 years ago
China was still poor, they had many more people starving prior to that. Mao turned things around.
Tsukae 2 years ago
Taiwan was one of the poorest region in China before the mid 20-th century, so since then there was no starvation ( and MAO) at all.
Xtrail121 2 years ago
Are you an idiot? Taiwan(or the Republic of China) is an island. Not even a part of mainland Asia and NEVER a part of the People's Republic of China. Learn some geography idiot.
Tsukae 2 years ago
More probabably you are an idiot asshole.Who said Taiwan is a part of mainland, but isn't it a chinese territory??? (please learn more geography, and history)
You are a tipical demagouge. If somebody is not on your opinion, you become pretty nervous, and the other is idiot.
Xtrail121 2 years ago 7
They have their own governing structures retard, the Chinese government maintains some level of control, but it is not the same as a typical PRC territory.
Tsukae 2 years ago
You logically misunderstood something!
We speak about the past when there was no PRC control over Taiwan at all!! .There were (are) two China: ROC (not communist) there were no starvations, but political terrorr was. PRC (communist) there were severe starvations because of the irrational economic and political system (great leap forward 1958, cult. rev.1966-1973) I must repeat: Since 1978 (thanks for Deng Xiaoping and NOT for Mao) PRC become a growing superpower!!!
Xtrail121 2 years ago
The cult. revolution would be more fatal and harmfull for PRC (sentenced the nuclear physicists, and missile researchers) if ZHOU ENLAI did not soften MAO's idiotism!!! Probably PRC had no hydrogen bomb at 1967, and had no satelitte at 1970.
Xtrail121 2 years ago
Well, no wonder you don't understand what is maoism, since you make such statements. Taiwan was a part of Japan, and was considered by them as a core japanese (in other words, not colonial or occupied) territory, so it was an integrated part of far richer nation than China. Not to mention the Chang Kai Shek took all chinese gold reserve and funds and, well, anything he could take and of course, Taiwan was an unticommunist inflatable carrier, while China stood all alone and even isolated.
timfidotru 2 years ago
Despite all above, several regions of China surpassed Taiwan in development.
timfidotru 2 years ago
@timfidotru . 1.Please describe what are the main features of maoism?
2. Which of these features are still determine PRC's internal politics?
Xtrail121 2 years ago
@ Xtrail121
1. Maoism is a philosophy, and not some kind of economic policy. It is not an independent school either, but implementation and development of marxism. It used some fresh approach comparing to other dogmatic marxists and developed some new theories and ideas. For example, Mao stated that no revolution could lead to any other type of society than the one that is determined by the industrial progress of a country. In chinese or soviet case it was capitalism.
timfidotru 2 years ago
He launched a cultural revolution since he proposed that a permanent revolution could lead to socialism directly, and that the people could establish direct democracy instead of a party bureaucracy. However it failed to do that.
2. That it remains being their philpsophy and methodology. It determines the way they think & generate ideas, and the ideology of course, but that is secondary.
timfidotru 2 years ago
@ timfidotru, if you are chinese in race than you are a traitor. If you are japanese, than I swear in blood, before the day I die, china will unite and take revenge on Japan. Japan will no longer exist.
Call me a communist, a racisit, maoist whatever. I do not care.
nunvikingsofthesea 2 years ago
@ nunvikingsofthesea
My nickname obviously determines my russian origin. I still have some connections with China.
It seems though you didn't understand what I was saying in my comment above. I told nothing about the future of Taiwan, just mentioned the historical fact of the island being a japanese territory and its administrative status to indicate its wealth comming out of it.
I advise you to reread my post and understand it better. It is rather prochinese, not anti-
timfidotru 2 years ago
Mao is the true hero of China. All ignorant western monkey men, shut up!
Hanueberalles 2 years ago 2
操！太强大了！不过现在想想还不如回到毛主席时代呢，人人看病上学免费，贫富差距不存在，因为都很穷！怀念我们伟大的毛主席啊！
WINDYCHUNG 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hey America...this is what is coming down the pike if Obama remains in office. It's another cultural revolution, except the Red Guards will be Obama's Urban "Green" Gestapo consisting of Acorn supporters, street thugs, and legions of ignorant, obedient, and adoring inner city flunkies. Time to turn this punk out before it is too late.
Schwarznasen 2 years ago
You compare Obama with Mao... tthat has to be an insaine compairasion.. one of the most insaine..
Eopyk 2 years ago 22
You are right.
Obama is worse.
The American government tricked the whole world into believing he was the hero to save the day so everybody loves the states again after Bush fucked everything up. As if it wasn't planned to do it like this all along.
Mao just was openly evil and the people got along with it.
I prefer Mao over Obama, because you could have done something against him if you want, American "leaders" are the same hypocrits and liars but with a clean suits...
lynth 2 years ago
Yes because the Government is one big united mass with a single overmind dictating policy and direction... they're obviously ruled by a bipartisan shadow council ¬_¬
The Republicans wanted you to vote McCain, face it... You yanks have such a backward hostility towards Governments that you'll blame them for anything ¬_¬
Henners1991 2 years ago
Mao was a hero. He turned an impoverished starving China into a super power.
Tsukae 2 years ago
Yeah, Obama is more like Hitler.
Mavus007 2 years ago
@Eopyk Yeah, Mao was SO much better a leader then Obama!
TheRetardifier 10 months ago
you can't compare communist leader with president because communism and democracy is very different
This song is a well-composed song anyway
25minutesTH 8 months ago
@25minutesTH -- The tune was from an old folk song. It was just set to new lyrics, which are hardly inspiring unless you worship Mao as a god.
adam13weishaupt 5 months ago in playlist dong fang hong
@ Schwarznasen
Obama has been elected. Didn't you vote, too?
Orjas67 2 years ago
He can be turned out of office, you know, via impeachment or recall. It should happen as soon as possible, in my opinion.
Schwarznasen 2 years ago
So all those American citizens that have voted for Obama don't count for you?
You think, in the U.S. democracy should be abolished in order to keep people like Obama from being elected?
Then say so openly.
Orjas67 2 years ago
Mousie Dung.
Schwarznasen 2 years ago
气势轩昂！
xiaomaodamao 2 years ago
thanks for your sharing. how nice of the song
littlechicchic 2 years ago
I heard this film is required viewing for the Obama cabinet.
Schwarznasen 3 years ago
haha
I heard that too
gloryfades107 2 years ago
So is Triumph of the Will required viewing of the Bush cabinet?
7boon 2 years ago
Who gives a rat's ass about the Bush cabinet? They're GONE (just in case you haven't noticed). You must be a liberal...always trying to change the argument. Bush and his cronies are history. Deal with the new incompoetent in DC town.
Schwarznasen 2 years ago
I'm not the one trying to associate Chairman Mao with Obama. Or is that big W sign around your neck making you think unclearly?
7boon 2 years ago
I see. Now you are trying to associate me with the former president? Your unflagging liberalness is showing. Yours is the typical lib eral response to any unflattering observation made of your beloved messiah...change the argument. There is no point attempting to argue rationally, logically or cogently with you since you can't remain true to the core issues of the debate.
Schwarznasen 2 years ago
Nowhere did I mention anything about Obama. I certainly don't adore him, since he is a human being.
Try again.
7boon 2 years ago
Perhaps you should return to the Altar to Obama you have in your bedroom, light a few candles, and bray to the enlightened one. You'll feel better, and stop polluting youtuibe with bullshit. In case you haven't noticed, W has been gone for a long time.
BO is at the helm. Let's see how well he steers the craft.
Schwarznasen 2 years ago
i rather be in a german like fascist society than a communist dictatoral chinese society where everyone is poor and miserable and life sucks.
atleast life was good from germans who were german and nothing else
but il take good old capitalist america above both!
gloryfades107 2 years ago
Ah, another "Mussolini is a good guy because at least he made trains run on time" moran.
7boon 2 years ago 2
maybe you should read more than the first line of my post before you start ASSuming what I believe.
gloryfades107 2 years ago
哪里庖出来的幼稚园孩子？
IbelieveJr 2 years ago
Yeah citizens really had it worse under the DDR than Hitler... all that blasted socialised healthcare, free daycare, guaranteed housing and consumer products.... terrible.
Henners1991 2 years ago
Borat shows up at the end. Jagshemash!
Ropponmatsu2 3 years ago
Orjas67 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck mao. he didnt love the people at all. there were many men in the ccp that helped stop the great leap forward which in result saved millions of lives.
Nightwisher87 3 years ago
crazyanne 点击 2:10
welovechinagogogo 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
看见的评论！真有一点感慨！自从禽兽解放军及共产党赢了国民党的军队後！西方列强已经不再入侵中国及迫害中国人民了！因为西方列强已经有了共产党及解放军这班狗奴才帮助它们迫害中国人民了！不知道禽兽毛泽东及禽兽周恩来偷偷的运了中国多少粮食去苏联！中国人民的血和汗！
brokensocialism 3 years ago
果然是智商无下限
szdp55123 3 years ago
怕! 怕我的言论把你那已经失败! 在世界消失的共产主义打倒吗?
antisocialism 3 years ago
共产主义国家诞生至今不到一百年就有十几个个国家了，当年第一个资本主义国家诞生后一百年世界有几个资本主义国家？一个？当年英国在资本主义国家诞生一百年后才成为资本主义国家的时候，使用的尚且是君主立宪制，照样有封建残留，凭什么要求我们现在的共产主义国家那么纯粹？
szdp55123 3 years ago
SB一个
qtbrmdh 3 years ago
Mao was a man, but he was a great man, a man of many triumphs and mistakes. But he indeed changed a nation, the kind of achievements he had (and his comrades in arms - some of whom he later did indeed suppress) are so grand, it's unimaginable. They were much more substantial than some imaginable fable God of the Bible; the old generation of comrades are really "Gods" among humans.
ubcphysicsyangbo 3 years ago 14
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He was better than waht preceeded him...
But if we're gonna compare tyrants here, I'd pick Stalin over Mao for achievements...
Mao was a feudal despot with no idea over how an economic system worked... he didn't even delegate such tasks due to his amazing paranoia and arrogance, *he* had to be in control. He was no more a Communist than any other Bolsheviks, Stalinists or Maoists we've seen in the world today.
And never *ever* compare him to being a deity :-/ How is that communism?!
Henners1991 3 years ago
rofl apparently kim jong il is a diety like his father was
Edward2616 3 years ago
@ubcphysicsyangbo
I am half Chinese half Guiawlow, my father is portuguese and my mother is chinese, my chinese grandfather was a landlord, he was killed and his possessions, my mother was humiliated and paraded around the streets, she migrated to Macau has a illegal migrant, and worked her way to were she is today, in capitalist macau, what did the communist party achieve? rotting out Chinas intellectuals? killing millions of its own people, my grandfather included, for what?
portugalreis 1 year ago
@portugalreis because your granpa was a reactionary. he deserved it. for all we know, your grandpa might have committed some blood debts against the poor peasants in his village :P
ivanenrile 1 year ago
@portugalreis In short, your grandpa deserved to die for being a landlord.... Actually dying that way would have been better than being starved to death as a peasant.
edarion01 1 year ago
@portugalreis
"for what?"
- For Macau turn to part of continental PR China;)
ruerik 1 year ago
@ubcphysicsyangbo So is the Great Leap and Culture Revolution he created. Absolute power makes a man very corrupted, so much more so on a great man; the addiction to power and worship makes a great man commit crimes 1000 times worse than corruption.
iysum 1 year ago
i want chinese girls
silverio1942 3 years ago
with your attitude, you won't get any girls
ubcphysicsyangbo 3 years ago
hermoso, te hace derramar lagrimas
elchicodelcamino 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
毛泽东,大部份人称它为大肚毛,肥东, 1893-1976, 雄性!死後不能入士为安!死无葬身之地!现在已被中国人製成标本!志大才疏!生前给中国人暗駡!死後给中国人大駡!经常有人大叫 毛泽东万衰!万衰!万万衰!它是卖国贼!马克思,列宁走狗!在全中国人民食草食树根导致骨瘦如柴的时候,它的身体也能长肉!贱肉横生!有人称它是肥猪,马克思的狗奴才!龟公!其实!毛泽东是禽兽都不如的杂种.
brokensocialism 3 years ago
brokensocialism is a brainwashed thug, go back to believing your superstitious nonsense
ubcphysicsyangbo 3 years ago
Go, fuck your mother, taiwanese spy.
wchao1026 3 years ago
操你妈的，台北省间谍！
Liquifier 3 years ago 2
幹你良
fightthespoons 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
起来! 不愿做共产党奴隶的人民! 打倒共产党你们才有生天! 如果不是! 你迟早死在共产党的枪下! 起来! 起来! 起来来!
共产主义及社会主义是注定失败的. 现在全世界只有五个名字叫共产主义国家的国家. 有多少个正在搞资本主义呢? 大家心照明白! 在共产国家的人民. 个个做牛做马. 而共产党的幹部就大鱼大肉. 你看当年毛泽东的肚子那麽大. 中国人民个个都骨瘦如柴. 大家心里就明白了. 穷产党!
当年很多中国人加入共产党! 你们知道为什麽吗. 是因为只有共产党员才好食好住. 如果是平民! 食草就有得食! 如果你拿毛泽东的照片跟中国百姓的照片一比. 你就会明白的了. 为什麽毛泽东的肚子是那麽大的呢? 那时候中国不是很穷吗? 他食了中国人民的屎, 所以肚了那麽大吧!
现在中国不是在共产党带领下一步一步的走向民族复兴! 而是中国人民放弃共产党及共产主义而搞资本主义而令中华民族复兴! 明白未呀! 共产党的龟蛋!
中国共产党应该将大陆归还中华民国政府. 然後实行人民民主选举中国总统.还政於民. 取消一党专政! 中国才有希望呀. 人权! 民主! 自由! 平等!
chukfong 3 years ago
民国是他妈什么狗屁东西？蒋老子早就被赶到台湾去了。现在那么个伪政府早就不敢大肆说什么收复大陆的屁话了！中国共产党的伟大就是在于它解放了穷人！宰了小部分的肥的流油的地主们，把资源投入大部分老百姓里。没有共产党就没有新中国！如果没有共产党，老子我祖辈也不可能有文化，老子我也不会有机会坐在这里教训你这个小孽种！
yangboyangboyangbo 3 years ago
yangboyangboyangbo, 你的口很臭!共产党宰了小部分的肥的流油的地主们，把资源投入共产党党员及支持者的口袋里。自己做改头换面的皇帝. 所以毛泽东食到像猪一样肥!所以很多人称它(毛泽东)死肥猪.
brokensocialism 3 years ago
Are you sure?Two Korean girls?!It's ture or just you think they are Korean
Spinple 3 years ago