Well all can say is that you should watch the unedited version of this debate. After you have done so you might want to ponder why this clip has been edited so tightly and the popular mechanics teams reply to this statement about two hoses was not included.
In the real "un-edited" debate Bermas and the other weird looking dude are absolutely smacked down by the explanations of popular mechanics ie professionals. Quit wasting your lives truthers!
The dislikes on this video are like lady gaga's penis.... Small and shouldn't be there. To all the doubters keep trusting the government run and go sign up for all there programs, turn in all your weapons and sign up to be chipped, for your safety of course
Jason Bermas owns no one here. All this is is another typical truther edited bullshit vid. Try showing the entire video where the person responds to every one of Bermas bullshit claims with facts that prove him wrong to the point that Bermas just mad and starts his typical truther yelling and crying.
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers
Hahahah I can't believe people actually believe the nonsense spewing out Bermas' mouth. Who gave this asshole a camera anyways, he has no engineering background and he uses the least credible sources of information. Pathetic
There are enough holes in the official story. There is no need to fake anything in order to prove it.
I cant understand how "Believers" can buy into this Official Story that was dreamed up from a guy living in a cave. THEN, they all think it would have been just too hard for insiders to do the same thing. How Lame. LOL!
@Humantidote Woww... Seriously?? Really?? Your saying they photoshopped images in Loose Change? Woah, why don't you go and actually watch it first. Racist peice
You guys that say negative things about Jason or anyone else...it don't take a rocket scientist to know it was all fixed. Maybe years later it will come out, just like the JFK assassination did.
@JohnnyStorm2007 Pales in comparison to the release of the fake moon landings, big foot, and any other conspiracy theory that Alex Jones is ranting on this week.
Seriously, you need to get better front men for the truther movement than complete idiots like Bermas, Jones, and Avery before more than half the idiots in america (don't worry there, there are a ton of idiots) buy into a bullshit story.
Yeah! Popular mechanics and their book of facts and footnotes has nothing on Loose Brains and their "mockumentary" with no facts, just spooky music and photoshopped images!
The boys sure have a funny definition for truth!
I would love to be able to sue those three infants for the lies in their video and take the money and actually give it to the families of 9/11 victims like the hypocrites said they would! Why have they not?
Popular mechanics is hiding behind "experts" while loose change is asking plain and simple common sense questions (exp. where the fuck is the engine?) .
The fact that these two guys are - as many of you wannabe elitists are calling them - are just your average "uneducated" US citizens with no access to the types of resources that those two dry old men would've had only makes their statements more credible.
We all know that a typical house fire can get up to temperatures to about 1000 degrees right?? I know this because i am a fire science major and all my professors have 30+ years experenice in the Fire service...plus i have also read the NIST reports, and have not seen anything stating what the temperature was on the floors that were hit.
I like Jason Bermas for his quest for truth...However, he needs to go away from the acting tough act. He can't pull it off. Whenver someone tries to act tough and they clearly are not, it is embarrassing to watch. The way he fidgets and his facial expressions are a clear sign of a non-fighter trying to give off vibes that he is one. Again, I love Loose Change and I respect Jason for doing it, but please don't embarrass yourself anymore.
For anyone to believe in a conspiracy theory in 2010, they are beyond the average moron. An average moron believed it within the first 2 or 3 years of 911. Now you have to be something called a super monogoloid. 98 percent of shit they are saying have been showed to be bullshit. 98 percent of the quotes and shit they use have been proven to be totally out of context. Like the news reporter saying "its a cruise missile"
@Northeastbaseball The top temperatures fightfighters can stay in for only a short time is 500% F. This is information that NIST has out. And thats with full protective suit. So no firefighters cannot stay in fires of around 600% F for any ammount of time to combat fires.
I really cannot understand anyone that watched the movie and this debate to call Jason a fraud, liar, how he dressed disrespectfully (come on, really?) or what have you. He was an AVERAGE American, a YOUNG one, that saw 9/11 and DID SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
Even if you didn't watch the movie, you must realize throughout the whole debate the Loose Change people kept speeding through facts with numbers and names to back them up while the other side kept using big adjectives to waste time. WAKE UP!!
OWNS? Let's examine the participants of this "debate." You have two, snickering, boorish children with no formal education (one was denied entry to film school). And two older, calm, meticulous men, both professional and college educated. The children's assertions are laughable and I doubt they could withstand a real debate on the subject past the introduction.
@OrionEffects ya go watch loose change then try and say there not educated, that college degree means dick shit when you deal with something as specific as this, they don't exactly teach a 9/11 class in college.
Jason is a Homo who has no clue. Hes the liar as is Alex Jones. These assholes are doing nothing but exploiting 9/11 to line there pockets and make a name for themselves. Hell even negative publicity is still good publicity. Let him call me a liar and see what happens.
o Jimmy Walters, who appeared at St Marks church at a 9/11 Truth event and showed a film focusing on the sexual habits, homosexuality, bestiality and sexual perversions (in detail) of members of the Bush administration. Many of those in attendance left, appalled at the content being presented at a Les Jamieson promoted 9/11 event.
Bermas & Avery did own in that debate. So much so Popular Mechanics made the famous back pedal quote...."124ft in change, not loose change" when they were discussing the pentagon. You losers are pathetic to think the guys coming out against the truthers are not bought and paid for by the criminals that did it. Go ahead and live in the dark, and the rest of you "debutt buddies" keep licking the balls of the NWO
9/11 WAS an inside job.. now thumb down my comment like a good little bitch
Prove it wasn't. I have no idea what to believe, there just seems proof for both sides. im leaning more towards the inside job. I want to be able to trust our government, but I just don't know.
I have no need to prove that it was terroists. Planes fly into a bunch of buildings in the US...mmm looks like an attack by terrorists to me. This is definatly a cae where can swicth the question around. The truthers are th ones who have to prove something.
Just ignore loose change and compare the 9 11 research website and journal of 9 11 studies. Compare these to the debunking sights. For instance journal of debunking 9 11. Compare the two. The controlled demolition hypothesis (as yet un explored by any official investigation) fits the collapses far better than the fantastical fallacy that is the NIST final report.
Why has no one pointed out that at teh beginning he talks of the building 'IMPLODING' like a controlled demo, then he shows this video of debris 'EXPLODING' out of the floors below which according to him is also like a controlled demo below. You can't argue that way, makes you look like a akid who doesn't get enough ice cream
How does Bermas own? He starts off by directly and immediately discrediting himself: "I'm not calling anybody a liar. I am calling you a liar." Brilliant. Then the rest of his diatribe makes zero sense. A lack of evidence of burning is evidence that its NOT air pressure causing the windows to blow out?
waddsworth: You guys make me laugh, wouldn't doubt it if you were all one person. No truth seekers or Activists are going to debate this. So get off your ass and go bother someone else. We know the truth.
I am glad this is humorous to you. Its obvious that you don't take the subject matter seriously, especially when you regard this clown as the ring-leader of your circus.
I hope you take comfort in the fact that your shephard is a bona-fide retard.
What I've noticed on youtube is a handful of people who are posting scientific questions because they question the official 911 story. They have valid questions, many of which can't be answered by YouTubers.
Then there's a group of people pretending that anyone who questions 911 is a tin foil hat wearing loon. These people resort to personal attacks and vulgar language to discredit their opposition. It's called being a propagandist. I say both sides should refute politely with science.
This is the type of conspiracy theorist I usually run into (see quote below) all talk. I'd love to actually debate someone who sticks to the issues and does not resort to personal attacks.
"i can and will intellectually dominate you in this debate, enter it at your own risk . i can refute guys like you all day long, with clear precise logic, reason, objectivity and rationale. " -jblaz1024
its a waste of time we should stop arguin with these people... they spend several hours a day posting the same old offensive messages over and over ... just give their comment a thumbs down and ignore them and they'll go away.
"We made that film essentially as a bunch of kids... we were a bunch of kids tackling a subject far beyond the scope of one documentary. I will be the first to admit that our film definitely contained errors and it still does contain some dubious claims and it definitely does come to some conclusions that are not 100% backed up by the facts" -Dylan Avery Regarding Loose Change and Loose Change 2nd edition. See Hardfire video : Loose Change Debate 911 program Part I
why don't you get your facts straight and watch how none of these 9/11 questions have been answered. You're an idiot if you believe the official story.
Steven Jones states that NIST used a model to simulate the collapse and compares the warping of the physical model (3in) to the warping used in the computer model (42 in). He makes a big deal about the difference in these values but fails to mention the scale of the model. Second, Kevin Ryan states that there was no energy source to remove the fireproofing. Is he ignoring the kinetic energy of the planes?
Finally (for now) Kevin Ryan states that NIST does not address the collapse itself. However, on its website NIST addresses the issue of collapse time, conservation of energy and other topics in the frequently asked questions section.
For example, he makes the argument that the fire was too hot for people near the impact zone to survive. Does he think the heat was uniformly distributed for a fixed amount of time? His arguments are weak and only a very uninformed person would believe them. And avooz you can put me on your list if you want...that's not even a very good cyber threat.
Yes. I'm the one that posted this video. I'm the one who has my face plastered all over my profile.
For anyone who would like to see Bermas getting owned once again check out the Hardfire clip. Each and every one of his ridiculous claims is destroyed.
physman2011- you're the idiot, you haven't proved anybody wrong because you have no facts. Sit back before I add you too my list of debunkers who get fucking owned like bitches.
Maybe you didn't quite understand my comment. I said that if you want to see Bermas owned you should watch the hardfire clip. Each of Bermas' ridiculous claims is taken apart by a true researcher. Bermas has a fundamental lack of scientific knowledge and apparently does not even bother to think before he speaks.
A perfect example of Bermas' childlike tactics. "I'm not calling anybody a liar sir, I'm calling you a liar. Cause you are a liar". LOL , I laugh at that everytime. Shouldn't the title of this be Jason Bermas owned?
Well all can say is that you should watch the unedited version of this debate. After you have done so you might want to ponder why this clip has been edited so tightly and the popular mechanics teams reply to this statement about two hoses was not included.
ma049 4 weeks ago
In the real "un-edited" debate Bermas and the other weird looking dude are absolutely smacked down by the explanations of popular mechanics ie professionals. Quit wasting your lives truthers!
thomasmargollesable1 1 month ago
if you believe 9/11 was an inside job and distrust our government so much....why not just move? Seems simple enough
Suspectcobra 3 months ago
The dislikes on this video are like lady gaga's penis.... Small and shouldn't be there. To all the doubters keep trusting the government run and go sign up for all there programs, turn in all your weapons and sign up to be chipped, for your safety of course
scionrider1 3 months ago
Jason Bermas owns no one here. All this is is another typical truther edited bullshit vid. Try showing the entire video where the person responds to every one of Bermas bullshit claims with facts that prove him wrong to the point that Bermas just mad and starts his typical truther yelling and crying.
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers
12weasel100 3 months ago
Once again, Bermas is just spouting lies and half truths, get used to it, it's just what he does.
MrMZaccone 8 months ago 2
Bernas accuses people of lying, he is lucky he doesn't get his bitch face punched in.
playadominical 10 months ago
There is not a single educated person who believes this idiot...
End of story!
RonPielep 11 months ago
Hahahah I can't believe people actually believe the nonsense spewing out Bermas' mouth. Who gave this asshole a camera anyways, he has no engineering background and he uses the least credible sources of information. Pathetic
RonPielep 11 months ago
There are enough holes in the official story. There is no need to fake anything in order to prove it.
I cant understand how "Believers" can buy into this Official Story that was dreamed up from a guy living in a cave. THEN, they all think it would have been just too hard for insiders to do the same thing. How Lame. LOL!
infoseeker264 1 year ago
@Humantidote Woww... Seriously?? Really?? Your saying they photoshopped images in Loose Change? Woah, why don't you go and actually watch it first. Racist peice
Of shit
TheDemonDisturbed 1 year ago
You guys that say negative things about Jason or anyone else...it don't take a rocket scientist to know it was all fixed. Maybe years later it will come out, just like the JFK assassination did.
JohnnyStorm2007 1 year ago
@JohnnyStorm2007 Pales in comparison to the release of the fake moon landings, big foot, and any other conspiracy theory that Alex Jones is ranting on this week.
Seriously, you need to get better front men for the truther movement than complete idiots like Bermas, Jones, and Avery before more than half the idiots in america (don't worry there, there are a ton of idiots) buy into a bullshit story.
Stoolie33 9 months ago
LOL sadly, this is actually "owning" for a conspiracy theorist. Name-calling. Best they can do, unfortunately.
eatwoodman 1 year ago
Yeah! Popular mechanics and their book of facts and footnotes has nothing on Loose Brains and their "mockumentary" with no facts, just spooky music and photoshopped images!
The boys sure have a funny definition for truth!
I would love to be able to sue those three infants for the lies in their video and take the money and actually give it to the families of 9/11 victims like the hypocrites said they would! Why have they not?
Humantidote 1 year ago
Popular mechanics is hiding behind "experts" while loose change is asking plain and simple common sense questions (exp. where the fuck is the engine?) .
The fact that these two guys are - as many of you wannabe elitists are calling them - are just your average "uneducated" US citizens with no access to the types of resources that those two dry old men would've had only makes their statements more credible.
Rsinal331 1 year ago
We all know that a typical house fire can get up to temperatures to about 1000 degrees right?? I know this because i am a fire science major and all my professors have 30+ years experenice in the Fire service...plus i have also read the NIST reports, and have not seen anything stating what the temperature was on the floors that were hit.
Northeastbaseball 1 year ago
I like Jason Bermas for his quest for truth...However, he needs to go away from the acting tough act. He can't pull it off. Whenver someone tries to act tough and they clearly are not, it is embarrassing to watch. The way he fidgets and his facial expressions are a clear sign of a non-fighter trying to give off vibes that he is one. Again, I love Loose Change and I respect Jason for doing it, but please don't embarrass yourself anymore.
fletchdrebon 1 year ago
For anyone to believe in a conspiracy theory in 2010, they are beyond the average moron. An average moron believed it within the first 2 or 3 years of 911. Now you have to be something called a super monogoloid. 98 percent of shit they are saying have been showed to be bullshit. 98 percent of the quotes and shit they use have been proven to be totally out of context. Like the news reporter saying "its a cruise missile"
Guinea54 1 year ago
Actually a firefighter can stay in a building up to about a 1000 degrees F. Most house fires get that hot.
Northeastbaseball 1 year ago
Firefighters can...With proper protective clothing
Northeastbaseball 1 year ago
@Northeastbaseball The top temperatures fightfighters can stay in for only a short time is 500% F. This is information that NIST has out. And thats with full protective suit. So no firefighters cannot stay in fires of around 600% F for any ammount of time to combat fires.
darion65 1 year ago
I really cannot understand anyone that watched the movie and this debate to call Jason a fraud, liar, how he dressed disrespectfully (come on, really?) or what have you. He was an AVERAGE American, a YOUNG one, that saw 9/11 and DID SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
Even if you didn't watch the movie, you must realize throughout the whole debate the Loose Change people kept speeding through facts with numbers and names to back them up while the other side kept using big adjectives to waste time. WAKE UP!!
spiritfired 1 year ago
LMAO Bermas pwnt those liars lolll
hamid954 1 year ago
That's interesting, you decided not to include the rebuttal to his point.
Anghellik9 1 year ago
JASON BERMAS FTW
jesse5jesse 1 year ago
OWNS? Let's examine the participants of this "debate." You have two, snickering, boorish children with no formal education (one was denied entry to film school). And two older, calm, meticulous men, both professional and college educated. The children's assertions are laughable and I doubt they could withstand a real debate on the subject past the introduction.
OrionEffects 1 year ago
@OrionEffects ya go watch loose change then try and say there not educated, that college degree means dick shit when you deal with something as specific as this, they don't exactly teach a 9/11 class in college.
719joseph 1 year ago
Mike Toreno knows the truth
Velasca 2 years ago
lier lier pants on fire. This guy is talking out of his arse.
krissyeh 2 years ago
Jason is a Homo who has no clue. Hes the liar as is Alex Jones. These assholes are doing nothing but exploiting 9/11 to line there pockets and make a name for themselves. Hell even negative publicity is still good publicity. Let him call me a liar and see what happens.
BeerDrinkersParty 2 years ago
pwned
uwmbigb 2 years ago
Bermas is spittin' like a rapper over this casio beat! LOL! Great video. 5 stars.
FanatikJ 2 years ago 4
True patriots at work here.
m1ke905 2 years ago 8
o Jimmy Walters, who appeared at St Marks church at a 9/11 Truth event and showed a film focusing on the sexual habits, homosexuality, bestiality and sexual perversions (in detail) of members of the Bush administration. Many of those in attendance left, appalled at the content being presented at a Les Jamieson promoted 9/11 event.
Les Jamieson NYCCAN
NYsentinel 2 years ago
Bermas & Avery did own in that debate. So much so Popular Mechanics made the famous back pedal quote...."124ft in change, not loose change" when they were discussing the pentagon. You losers are pathetic to think the guys coming out against the truthers are not bought and paid for by the criminals that did it. Go ahead and live in the dark, and the rest of you "debutt buddies" keep licking the balls of the NWO
9/11 WAS an inside job.. now thumb down my comment like a good little bitch
2Freedom1Fighter7 2 years ago 5
Awesome comment. The gaylords putting down Jason are punk ass bitches who haven't done any research.
tooniverse 2 years ago 6
watch screw loose change.,
Transmissionwould 2 years ago
@tooniverse What constitutes as research for you? If you think research is about smoking joints and finding gaps I have some bad news...
While we might not have all the evidence to support the standard theory , there is much less evidence to support the claim that it was an inside job.
In fact the only evidence that supports that it was is a "lack" of evidence.
The truth is the truth regardless of how you feel.
feshberd 3 months ago
It was an inside job?
Prove it right here right now. Please don't send me some video of Jason Bermas or Dylan Avery, those guys are full of shit.
Transmissionwould 2 years ago
Prove it wasn't. I have no idea what to believe, there just seems proof for both sides. im leaning more towards the inside job. I want to be able to trust our government, but I just don't know.
jabacha580 2 years ago
I have no need to prove that it was terroists. Planes fly into a bunch of buildings in the US...mmm looks like an attack by terrorists to me. This is definatly a cae where can swicth the question around. The truthers are th ones who have to prove something.
Transmissionwould 2 years ago
Just ignore loose change and compare the 9 11 research website and journal of 9 11 studies. Compare these to the debunking sights. For instance journal of debunking 9 11. Compare the two. The controlled demolition hypothesis (as yet un explored by any official investigation) fits the collapses far better than the fantastical fallacy that is the NIST final report.
finncroesor 2 years ago
He is a complete moron, he keeps using straw man arguments and twisting actual words.
SUNSNARE06 2 years ago
You are the moron. Get a degree!
josephericlopez 2 years ago
How is this owning someone? He's just listing truther myths and whoever posted this video edited out the part with the rebuttal. It's a rant.
oldhatrs25 2 years ago
Comment removed
kcuf7 2 years ago
jason owned these guys the whole time.
2Freedom1Fighter7 2 years ago
no he didnt, he cant debate worth shit, he's just an uneducated assclown
Dumb fuck
SUNSNARE06 2 years ago
Comment removed
kcuf7 2 years ago
Rambling idiot. He has a total scatter-gun approach to this subject. The only people he manages to dupe are dunces.
b0ris360 2 years ago 2
Why has no one pointed out that at teh beginning he talks of the building 'IMPLODING' like a controlled demo, then he shows this video of debris 'EXPLODING' out of the floors below which according to him is also like a controlled demo below. You can't argue that way, makes you look like a akid who doesn't get enough ice cream
21stCenturyPala 3 years ago
How does Bermas own? He starts off by directly and immediately discrediting himself: "I'm not calling anybody a liar. I am calling you a liar." Brilliant. Then the rest of his diatribe makes zero sense. A lack of evidence of burning is evidence that its NOT air pressure causing the windows to blow out?
waddsworth 3 years ago
waddsworth: You guys make me laugh, wouldn't doubt it if you were all one person. No truth seekers or Activists are going to debate this. So get off your ass and go bother someone else. We know the truth.
JohnnyStorm2007 3 years ago
I am glad this is humorous to you. Its obvious that you don't take the subject matter seriously, especially when you regard this clown as the ring-leader of your circus.
I hope you take comfort in the fact that your shephard is a bona-fide retard.
waddsworth 3 years ago
@waddsworth your 50 cent words mean nothing when spoken from a real idiot, "diatribe" <-- contextually misused.
donmajikjuan 1 year ago
What I've noticed on youtube is a handful of people who are posting scientific questions because they question the official 911 story. They have valid questions, many of which can't be answered by YouTubers.
Then there's a group of people pretending that anyone who questions 911 is a tin foil hat wearing loon. These people resort to personal attacks and vulgar language to discredit their opposition. It's called being a propagandist. I say both sides should refute politely with science.
brown55061 3 years ago 2
This is the type of conspiracy theorist I usually run into (see quote below) all talk. I'd love to actually debate someone who sticks to the issues and does not resort to personal attacks.
"i can and will intellectually dominate you in this debate, enter it at your own risk . i can refute guys like you all day long, with clear precise logic, reason, objectivity and rationale. " -jblaz1024
Physman2011 3 years ago
brown55061- well put
WulfgarCommand 2 years ago
its a waste of time we should stop arguin with these people... they spend several hours a day posting the same old offensive messages over and over ... just give their comment a thumbs down and ignore them and they'll go away.
ScootleRoyale 3 years ago
Physman2011 3 years ago
sweet!!!
izzysykopth 3 years ago
And one more thing to avooz..
Having a picture of he-man up on your profile is not intimidating it is , in fact, creepy.
Feel free to put me on your list if it makes you feel better.
By the power of greyskull!!!!!!
Physman2011 3 years ago
v=JUaRb0Z1KgU
why don't you get your facts straight and watch how none of these 9/11 questions have been answered. You're an idiot if you believe the official story.
avoozl07 3 years ago
Another great argument. Can you tell me exactly where the NIST report is mistaken?
Thanks
Physman2011 3 years ago
v=-IACdhpfZjk
it's right here.
avoozl07 3 years ago
Why don't you look at how that turned out?
Physman2011 3 years ago
Attention Avooz:
The link did not post....send it to me. Also, you are a total dumbass.
Good day sir
Physman2011 3 years ago
the link works. but then again when you don't wanna look at truth there is no link that will work. Beat your feet like a bicycle clown.
avoozl07 3 years ago
Do you see how the link turned out?
You are starting to scare me.
Physman2011 3 years ago
great argument! typical debunker, foot in mouth, head up ass.
avoozl07 3 years ago
Does anyone else see what I'm dealing with here?
Physman2011 3 years ago
Ok I watched the video. Here are my questions..
Steven Jones states that NIST used a model to simulate the collapse and compares the warping of the physical model (3in) to the warping used in the computer model (42 in). He makes a big deal about the difference in these values but fails to mention the scale of the model. Second, Kevin Ryan states that there was no energy source to remove the fireproofing. Is he ignoring the kinetic energy of the planes?
Physman2011 3 years ago
Finally (for now) Kevin Ryan states that NIST does not address the collapse itself. However, on its website NIST addresses the issue of collapse time, conservation of energy and other topics in the frequently asked questions section.
Physman2011 3 years ago
I'm waiting for your reply avooz.
Physman2011 3 years ago
For example, he makes the argument that the fire was too hot for people near the impact zone to survive. Does he think the heat was uniformly distributed for a fixed amount of time? His arguments are weak and only a very uninformed person would believe them. And avooz you can put me on your list if you want...that's not even a very good cyber threat.
Physman2011 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yes I saw the video....Bermas acted like a little baby. Thanks for posting
Physman2011 3 years ago
You're an idiot. End of story.
JohnnyStorm2007 3 years ago
I think you've demonstrated your lack of intellect. You sound just like Bermas with comments like "end of story" lol.
Physman2011 3 years ago
You need attention, don't you...
JohnnyStorm2007 3 years ago
Yes. I'm the one that posted this video. I'm the one who has my face plastered all over my profile.
For anyone who would like to see Bermas getting owned once again check out the Hardfire clip. Each and every one of his ridiculous claims is destroyed.
Physman2011 3 years ago
physman2011- you're the idiot, you haven't proved anybody wrong because you have no facts. Sit back before I add you too my list of debunkers who get fucking owned like bitches.
avoozl07 3 years ago
Maybe you didn't quite understand my comment. I said that if you want to see Bermas owned you should watch the hardfire clip. Each of Bermas' ridiculous claims is taken apart by a true researcher. Bermas has a fundamental lack of scientific knowledge and apparently does not even bother to think before he speaks.
Physman2011 3 years ago
The way you did this video really makes Jason look like the idiot he is. Thank you for that!
Sharky2055 3 years ago
Agreed. He's an immature idiot. My dogs behave better than he does. They're smarter than he is too.
Sharky2055 3 years ago
Oops almost forgot. Note to Jason Bermas
"A fool can ask more questions than a wise man can answer"
Physman2011 3 years ago
A perfect example of Bermas' childlike tactics. "I'm not calling anybody a liar sir, I'm calling you a liar. Cause you are a liar". LOL , I laugh at that everytime. Shouldn't the title of this be Jason Bermas owned?
Physman2011 3 years ago
no.. not at all . did you even watch the video ?
guaranaa 3 years ago
Great vid ji9mmy as always! :)
JimmysJuicyGem 3 years ago
That's awesome bout time someone finally told'em!!!!!
jselzer07 3 years ago