Such lies and crap. I can smell it from here. Look its like this start showing "MP" footage or us BF Veterans walk. This is Dice's last chance with alot of us. And with us you lose all your PC pre orders. If things changed that much from day to day it would change in the "SP" portion of the game as well.
There is no communication going. The US Forums are dead and we are not hearing anything from Dice. Stop screwing with us.
@Darksoul01 btw seriously, just give em time. Just because they haven't shown any multiplayer doesn't mean they won't maybe they finished with the SP already. Just calm down with all this.
@jblackrupert sorry are you replying to me?.....if you are explain exactly why......you might want to reread my post and realise that I was quoting someone else first....oh and dont forget to address me as sir next time or you'll be ignored.
Several of the BC2 videos were not real time. They used third party or in house software to apply "Super antialiasing" . Screenshots were also treated with super AA.
This was admitted by DICE on their UK forum.
Crytek also admited to faking videos using custom built levels not available in the retail game.
IE... Korean soldier being thrown through a wall leaving a hole.
lol@ warhawk & frontlines.................theres no comparison...they're both shit in the scheme of things..........have you even watched the bf3 trailers?....when you do you'll see why smaller maps and player counts to free up much needed memory for all the goodies are needed on crappy consoles....and that's not even rendering dx11......
Frontlines: fuel of war: 50 players. Don't give me that crap about XBOX 360 and PlayStation 3 not being powerful enough for more then 24 players, it's your overloaded engine and shit servers to blame.
PC should always be top priority for dev's. Thats how we console guys get the best quality, because it has to live up to PC. Also it will keep pushing the console market to strive for perfection and maybe get them to make consoles that actually stand up to PC's and aren't already surpassed by PC upon release
I dont have super computer, i still can run bfbc2 the way i find it good. My fps goes (depending whats happening and how much i can see) from 20 - 130, but usually its around 30 - 40. I cba doing all the work to get my specs here, its just a 700euro comp with dual core, GT220 or something like that with W7.
consoles are for n00b gamers............blah blah blah " I think you can't install BF3 with a 5 year old PC" ......wrong.....a 5 year old gaming pc would have a 7 series nvidia gpu 7800,7900,7950 for arguments sake which is the same g70 as the ps3....your crappy ps3 has a graphics chip in it that a pc gamer can pick up for around £15 or maybe $20 not sure on the exchange rate.
Please take away that nemesis cam thingy, when im trying to be recon sniper and i have a good spot, one kill and half the team is on my as. it will make it more thrilling having to find your enemies when you die instead of leading us straight to them. Just saying.....
But basically since they arent porting consoles onto pc...and since pc is being the main console....then that means they r porting from pc onto console? srry love bf3 want it like crazy!! but just had to play devils advocate sorry!
"...since you're building the engine based on the knowledge that you will release it on the consoles, you actually streamline the whole technology to be able to scale back to the weaker platforms. So in the end, by, you know, painting this high-end target, you actually set a new bar and then when you scale it back, I think people will be surprised to see how good it looks on the consoles."
- DICE
They seem to know what they're doing to me, no need to worry about a bad port or anything such. =)
Zh1nto says consoles are not getting more than 24 players due to hardware limitations and the interviewer butts in with " Yea we dont want players complaining about laggy frame rates etc"
Bach already said they could implement 32 players but some of the consoles makers licensing rules are not supportive...... nice interview btw!
@Zebrahead6000 It's called active listening, it's polite and if you don't do it the person you are speaking with may think you are not engaged in what they are saying. And yes, great interview :D
DICE had to make a choice, either state-of-the-art video quality and network intensive gameplay (eg. many dynamic objects) or maximum scale. They went with the former because it's more visually impressive and hence more marketable to the people who judge games primarily on appearance.
Perhaps if gamers were generally less shallow they would of been confident about prioritizing the player numbers to enable a larger and deeper battle experience.
@k1ll0raffe Ya, i'm sure they would tailor the game for 124 if there weren't hardware limitations. I don't mean on every map btw. 64 is a good number though.
@lordsangone Its not just about the (old) hardware. Sony & Microsoft LIMIT the amount of data that can be transferred to and from the console. 64 players will just end with too much information that cant be passed. It will result in cases like this: Person A destroys a building. The data needs to be sent to the other 63 people. Now multiple the destruction of that house with everything else going on. Its just too much data. Sony & Microsoft does not allow it.
like you said you cant give out curtain info. as a company...I know someone at Intel that gave 2 weeks notice and they made him pack his shit and leave that day so he doesnt know more about the products they are working on then he already knew. makes sence as a buisness. Nothing person just buisness im sure his boss didnt want to but had no choice.
map pack 7 and vietnam was a major fail cause they waited way too long to release. also the patch, the only one ever made, was just the same. they slacked big time for such a good game. and after listening to zhinto, it just reaffirmed all of it. in the end they paid for it by giving it to us free. all in all, the timing of the updates was piss poor. i hope it wont be like this for bf3. much props to you and colin but zhinto really didnt say much.
sorry but his whole explanation for 24 players for consoles is a bunch of hot air. maybe he doesnt know the whole deal but there really is no excuse for more players for consoles. but i can live with it cause i know dice will make the best of it. its just that 24 vs 64 just aint right. thats like two totally different games. is that what they are going for, two totally different battlefield experiences? someone needs to explain better, whats really going on..
@lordsangone how is it an excuse? CONSOLES HAVE LIMITATIONS, well everything has limitations including a gaming PC but you can much more on a Gaming PC than a console. We are talking about a 5-6 year old console that is using old hardware and specs. So how is it an excuse? it just doesn't make sense.
I'll bet my soul bfbc2 will not be played in 2-3 years. Why? it's not competitive. It's nearly impossible to play it competitive. it's a game made for pubwhores. It's the clanwars, league's and cup's that keeps a game alive. Battlefield 2 even had a nations cup no later then 2010(equivalent to world championship) 5 years after it's release. I still play bc2 public thou. And sadly it's the pub-stile games that sell. =/
"A game needs to be finished before it is shipped." A line that many game designers must listen to. "COD" (Cough, Cough) Although I do like COD 4 and MW2 even with all the problems because they're actually fun compared to Black Ops. World at War was also fun even with the awful hit detection.
@Served001 i have a ps3, too, but i own a 360 and a decent gaming pc. i still would rather play on my ps3 out of the three, but i can see the appeal of pc
@randrewm97 I find it that it's quite enjoeyable to play 3rd person games and racing games on my ps3 but it's not that amazing feel when you play a first person shooter on pc
@Served001 Is PC more for hardcore gamers. I am a casual gamer and only really play for fun. So would it be a bad idea to spend so much money on a PC. Because correct me if i am wrong, they can get pretty expensive, right?
@SHCP2010 Not at all. Price of a gaming pc that would run bf3 decently would be around $600-1 000. $600 pc would run it with a lower resolution 1024x768 / 1280x1024 and low/medium graphics settings while 1k pc would most likely run it all maxed up. I'd say that most of the pc gamers are casual but there are still an impressive amount of hc gamers.
@SHCP2010 Decent gaming pc isn't much more than $1000. You don't need to get one of those tho. If you have a semi new pc (vista, 7) then just get yourself a gtx 260 for about $100 and 2gb's of ram ($20). Youll be fine for all the games for the next three years or so at that point.
@SHCP2010 yes its true but you will be at a significant disadvantage. I highly recommend getting used to mouse and keyboard controls, you will like it a lot.
@Served001 Daniel said it - if you don't have a good grafic card you can't play that game on PC (32 vs. 32) ... IMO the consoles are even better than the PC's cause the consoles are 5 years old and I think you can't install BF3 with a 5 year old PC ;-)
@cajobe1971 Yeah i agree a little but i prefer playing the 32 vs 32 with a good community not to be rude, but most people on consoles are little kids :|
@Served001 I know what you mean ... I bought a Tritton HS ... so If they cry too loud I mute ;) ... and there aren't many at the PS3's who have HS's. Most of the time I have fun with my friends and kick asses LOL
@Served001 pc has got loads of crap that am sure console players wish they had, for example steam, does loads of great offers like just the other day they did boarderlands all of its downloadable for just 7:50$!!, then you got fallout, gta etc which you can mod the crap out, you guys got a never ending list!.
@LOL787LOL i know PC is better in some ways but look at some games being made on consoles and actaully working better on consoles look at all the pc exclsuvies going multiplatform. :|
I just can't afford that $2000 computer (building it myself)
LevitatingDuck 7 months ago
@LevitatingDuck you dont need that much money to run bf 3 ;) i guess it will work on my system on highest graphics, but no anti aliasing activated.
elletheking 7 months ago
damn that guy interviewing keeps on saying YA MHM YEP MHM YEP MHM MHM MHM just shut ur mouth
McdonaldsHashbrown 8 months ago
Let your employees live the values they live at home also at work without seperation. View my channel to live better.
slapcompany 8 months ago
Such lies and crap. I can smell it from here. Look its like this start showing "MP" footage or us BF Veterans walk. This is Dice's last chance with alot of us. And with us you lose all your PC pre orders. If things changed that much from day to day it would change in the "SP" portion of the game as well.
There is no communication going. The US Forums are dead and we are not hearing anything from Dice. Stop screwing with us.
Darksoul01 9 months ago
@Darksoul01 You said "all" PC preorders, I'm sure not all PC users share your opinion.
tacoblocko 8 months ago
@Darksoul01 btw seriously, just give em time. Just because they haven't shown any multiplayer doesn't mean they won't maybe they finished with the SP already. Just calm down with all this.
tacoblocko 8 months ago
i hate medics that think there snipers
hyper080 9 months ago
finally consoles get what they deserve
freestylerja16 10 months ago
High level of communication..BWWWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
DICE fled to Failbook and Twatter when they lied, bullshitted and pumped out the BC2 console port turd.
jblackrupert 10 months ago
@jblackrupert sorry are you replying to me?.....if you are explain exactly why......you might want to reread my post and realise that I was quoting someone else first....oh and dont forget to address me as sir next time or you'll be ignored.
JoNN1E71 10 months ago
@JoNN1E71
No, to Daniel's comments about the high level of communication on the forums.
DICE was given an order to stop talking on the UK Forum just before Gordon Van Dyke left
and they fled to Failbook and Twatter because people's reaction to the lies and faked videos
and screens for BC2 and it being an obvious console port.
Released screens and video were processed with "super AA" and NOT realtime. GVD finally admited it.
The US forum is a complete ghosttown.
jblackrupert 10 months ago
@jblackrupert what faked vids
hyper080 9 months ago
@hyper080
Several of the BC2 videos were not real time. They used third party or in house software to apply "Super antialiasing" . Screenshots were also treated with super AA.
This was admitted by DICE on their UK forum.
Crytek also admited to faking videos using custom built levels not available in the retail game.
IE... Korean soldier being thrown through a wall leaving a hole.
jblackrupert 9 months ago
@jblackrupert sorry its getting a bit hectic lol
JoNN1E71 10 months ago
killzone 2 "Better graphics than BF3 and BFBC2"
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
jesus,next you'll be saying the call of duty series is good
JoNN1E71 10 months ago 11
@JoNN1E71 well dude killzone 2 does have better graphics compared to BC2(on consoles) don't know about BF3
lolxjks 10 months ago
@JoNN1E71 killzone 3 has better graphics than bad company 2, but not than bf3
nfsmohpsp 9 months ago
When is Part 3 comming?
GameVidMakerTUSA 10 months ago
Whats with all these trolls
I swear when people have a bad day they jump onto youtube and bitch about everything
InfamousRabbiTT 10 months ago
Look at Killzone 2.
destruction.
Better graphics than BF3 and BFBC2
32 player huge maps.
dont tell me Consoles cant handle 32 or 48 players coz it can,
fucking cunts lazy assholes,
fuclesh 10 months ago
@fuclesh FUCKIN A
Creative1579 10 months ago
lol@ warhawk & frontlines.................theres no comparison...they're both shit in the scheme of things..........have you even watched the bf3 trailers?....when you do you'll see why smaller maps and player counts to free up much needed memory for all the goodies are needed on crappy consoles....and that's not even rendering dx11......
JoNN1E71 10 months ago
Frontlines: fuel of war: 50 players. Don't give me that crap about XBOX 360 and PlayStation 3 not being powerful enough for more then 24 players, it's your overloaded engine and shit servers to blame.
CommanderLukas 10 months ago
@CommanderLukas lol mag can handle 256 players
fuclesh 10 months ago
@fuclesh Yeah, I played MAG on a friends PS3, I didn't like it.
CommanderLukas 10 months ago
@CommanderLukas its not about quality its about the fact that a game can handle a shitload of players on a console
fuclesh 10 months ago
@CommanderLukas I agree they should AT LEAST go for 32-48 players
lolxjks 10 months ago
take a look @ warhawk. huge maps, 32 players on PS3, dedicated servers. DICE is just coughing up excuses for small maps.
speedglass69 10 months ago
PC should always be top priority for dev's. Thats how we console guys get the best quality, because it has to live up to PC. Also it will keep pushing the console market to strive for perfection and maybe get them to make consoles that actually stand up to PC's and aren't already surpassed by PC upon release
jackcepticeye 10 months ago
you are a medic, you have to revive soldiers!
sparato89 10 months ago
My fear about this game is two words: Minimum Requirements
joneunderground 10 months ago
@joneunderground Same here, I'm not worried about the processor or RAM requirements, but the graphic card...
Hi0123456789 10 months ago
@Hi0123456789 If you can play BC2 maxed out, you probably can play BF3 too.
WhiteHawk137 10 months ago
I dont have super computer, i still can run bfbc2 the way i find it good. My fps goes (depending whats happening and how much i can see) from 20 - 130, but usually its around 30 - 40. I cba doing all the work to get my specs here, its just a 700euro comp with dual core, GT220 or something like that with W7.
hcolyle 10 months ago
you have never lived if you have never played a battlefield game
nicktheodorou9 10 months ago
its so funny he is paying out cod so much
nicktheodorou9 10 months ago
Lol y won't people just accept console cant handle 64.. not matter the excuse it can't.. if it could they would implement it..
KINGhotaru11 10 months ago
@KINGhotaru11 i dunno and im a console player, and people neesd to open their eyes
nfsmohpsp 10 months ago
i wish we can have more soldier customization in BF3..like race..complexion..height..etc..
nil1230 10 months ago
@nil1230
lol i would make my soldier the jolly green giant XD
Shinoter187 10 months ago
consoles are for n00b gamers............blah blah blah " I think you can't install BF3 with a 5 year old PC" ......wrong.....a 5 year old gaming pc would have a 7 series nvidia gpu 7800,7900,7950 for arguments sake which is the same g70 as the ps3....your crappy ps3 has a graphics chip in it that a pc gamer can pick up for around £15 or maybe $20 not sure on the exchange rate.
JoNN1E71 10 months ago
yup yup yup huh uh yup yup hmmhmm
alburrito94 10 months ago
8:55 ahhh... nothing! LOL
chelo7 10 months ago
i would hate if they add killstreaks. that would just ruin it for me.
TheNeernitt 10 months ago
Please take away that nemesis cam thingy, when im trying to be recon sniper and i have a good spot, one kill and half the team is on my as. it will make it more thrilling having to find your enemies when you die instead of leading us straight to them. Just saying.....
Creative1579 10 months ago
@Creative1579
Yeah... If only they'd add a mode where you could hide your HUD and erase Kill Cams...
Call it... I don't know... Hardcore Mode or something clever like that..
xNoctis3 10 months ago
But basically since they arent porting consoles onto pc...and since pc is being the main console....then that means they r porting from pc onto console? srry love bf3 want it like crazy!! but just had to play devils advocate sorry!
krishm16 10 months ago
"...since you're building the engine based on the knowledge that you will release it on the consoles, you actually streamline the whole technology to be able to scale back to the weaker platforms. So in the end, by, you know, painting this high-end target, you actually set a new bar and then when you scale it back, I think people will be surprised to see how good it looks on the consoles."
- DICE
They seem to know what they're doing to me, no need to worry about a bad port or anything such. =)
lAmWatchingYou 10 months ago
@lAmWatchingYou alright... k thanks bro! definatly excited for bf3!
krishm16 10 months ago
Zh1nto says consoles are not getting more than 24 players due to hardware limitations and the interviewer butts in with " Yea we dont want players complaining about laggy frame rates etc"
Bach already said they could implement 32 players but some of the consoles makers licensing rules are not supportive...... nice interview btw!
cragz06 10 months ago
Colin, you need to stop saying, 'ya... yep... right on... yep' while your interviewee is talking.
Great interview though. Love you guys!
Zebrahead6000 10 months ago
@Zebrahead6000 It's called active listening, it's polite and if you don't do it the person you are speaking with may think you are not engaged in what they are saying. And yes, great interview :D
DirtKnapp 10 months ago
when the xbox 720 and the ps4 comes out they should make a bf3 that is on pair with the pc version.
dcj991 10 months ago
HAH! now we know, bf3 is gonna have spaceships :D
heilaff 10 months ago 21
Only thing I ask for in Battlefield 3 is some mercenary servers like in Black Ops. Yes I LOVE cod, and yes I have no friends :P
vethop 10 months ago 2
People want bigger dicks. BTW
32cuze32 10 months ago
Can't wait for the BF3! Would that price be a copy of BF3 early??? I would love to win that!
gamingfreakBfBc2 10 months ago
god damn advert won't move to the video, for me it is stuck at the end of the advert.
Musicgamesandvideo 10 months ago
DICE had to make a choice, either state-of-the-art video quality and network intensive gameplay (eg. many dynamic objects) or maximum scale. They went with the former because it's more visually impressive and hence more marketable to the people who judge games primarily on appearance.
Perhaps if gamers were generally less shallow they would of been confident about prioritizing the player numbers to enable a larger and deeper battle experience.
BF2 mods have recently reached 128 players.
Damecos 10 months ago
@Damecos well, in 5 years time, we will have both hopefully. Re-release for the next gen of consoles would be amazing, with 124 players. :)
jony1710 10 months ago
@jony1710 dice tried such numbers of players out but they find 64 players most fitting and enjoyable ;)
k1ll0raffe 10 months ago
@k1ll0raffe Ya, i'm sure they would tailor the game for 124 if there weren't hardware limitations. I don't mean on every map btw. 64 is a good number though.
jony1710 10 months ago
@lordsangone Its not just about the (old) hardware. Sony & Microsoft LIMIT the amount of data that can be transferred to and from the console. 64 players will just end with too much information that cant be passed. It will result in cases like this: Person A destroys a building. The data needs to be sent to the other 63 people. Now multiple the destruction of that house with everything else going on. Its just too much data. Sony & Microsoft does not allow it.
DimDima 10 months ago
like you said you cant give out curtain info. as a company...I know someone at Intel that gave 2 weeks notice and they made him pack his shit and leave that day so he doesnt know more about the products they are working on then he already knew. makes sence as a buisness. Nothing person just buisness im sure his boss didnt want to but had no choice.
wawowhead 10 months ago
YEP
Chazzos 10 months ago
Anyone else accidentally reading the in-game chat, instead of listening to the podcast? :)
TehMightyZarorg 10 months ago
( . Y . )
zZtrafficZz 10 months ago
THIS VIDEO SHIT
zzxxcvbgfhyu 10 months ago
map pack 7 and vietnam was a major fail cause they waited way too long to release. also the patch, the only one ever made, was just the same. they slacked big time for such a good game. and after listening to zhinto, it just reaffirmed all of it. in the end they paid for it by giving it to us free. all in all, the timing of the updates was piss poor. i hope it wont be like this for bf3. much props to you and colin but zhinto really didnt say much.
lordsangone 10 months ago
sorry but his whole explanation for 24 players for consoles is a bunch of hot air. maybe he doesnt know the whole deal but there really is no excuse for more players for consoles. but i can live with it cause i know dice will make the best of it. its just that 24 vs 64 just aint right. thats like two totally different games. is that what they are going for, two totally different battlefield experiences? someone needs to explain better, whats really going on..
lordsangone 10 months ago
@lordsangone how is it an excuse? CONSOLES HAVE LIMITATIONS, well everything has limitations including a gaming PC but you can much more on a Gaming PC than a console. We are talking about a 5-6 year old console that is using old hardware and specs. So how is it an excuse? it just doesn't make sense.
elsenciillo 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thumbs up if you watch it all
HugoSau19 10 months ago
I'll bet my soul bfbc2 will not be played in 2-3 years. Why? it's not competitive. It's nearly impossible to play it competitive. it's a game made for pubwhores. It's the clanwars, league's and cup's that keeps a game alive. Battlefield 2 even had a nations cup no later then 2010(equivalent to world championship) 5 years after it's release. I still play bc2 public thou. And sadly it's the pub-stile games that sell. =/
KinesVildHasse 10 months ago
I really like bigger things wink wink (.)(.) lol
CRIMINANGEL455 10 months ago
"A game needs to be finished before it is shipped." A line that many game designers must listen to. "COD" (Cough, Cough) Although I do like COD 4 and MW2 even with all the problems because they're actually fun compared to Black Ops. World at War was also fun even with the awful hit detection.
InfuriatedHawk 10 months ago
zh1nt0 is truly a legend
jayekaiser 10 months ago 6
@jayekaiser Yes sir he is :D
M3G45P4WN 10 months ago
how many like does that 1 million facebook thing have at the moment?
TheAmazingJayden 10 months ago
@TheAmazingJayden idk, maybe go look for yourself
randrewm97 10 months ago
but consoles could hand 32 couldn't they =(
(sits in corner and cry's for an hour)
TheAmazingJayden 10 months ago
@TheAmazingJayden dont cry please
gladiadori1 10 months ago
@TheAmazingJayden Probably not with the updated engine and graphics. It's such a leap in technology that consoles can't handle the full player load.
mab4110 10 months ago
@TheAmazingJayden no they cant
redwingsfan1516 10 months ago
zh1nto > JD2020
BlameSkillz 10 months ago
I got a ps3 myself but serisouly i think PC should ALWAYS get better things then consoles.
Served001 10 months ago 100
@Served001 i have a ps3, too, but i own a 360 and a decent gaming pc. i still would rather play on my ps3 out of the three, but i can see the appeal of pc
randrewm97 10 months ago
@randrewm97 I find it that it's quite enjoeyable to play 3rd person games and racing games on my ps3 but it's not that amazing feel when you play a first person shooter on pc
Served001 10 months ago
@Served001 why?
SHCP2010 10 months ago
@SHCP2010 because PC is more superior and for the past time it ketp gettin DLC late and sometimes even no add ons
Served001 10 months ago
@Served001 Is PC more for hardcore gamers. I am a casual gamer and only really play for fun. So would it be a bad idea to spend so much money on a PC. Because correct me if i am wrong, they can get pretty expensive, right?
SHCP2010 10 months ago
@SHCP2010 Not at all. Price of a gaming pc that would run bf3 decently would be around $600-1 000. $600 pc would run it with a lower resolution 1024x768 / 1280x1024 and low/medium graphics settings while 1k pc would most likely run it all maxed up. I'd say that most of the pc gamers are casual but there are still an impressive amount of hc gamers.
wizardbliz 10 months ago
@SHCP2010 Decent gaming pc isn't much more than $1000. You don't need to get one of those tho. If you have a semi new pc (vista, 7) then just get yourself a gtx 260 for about $100 and 2gb's of ram ($20). Youll be fine for all the games for the next three years or so at that point.
TheFriendlyCanadian 10 months ago
@TheFriendlyCanadian Ok cool, and is it true you can play with an xbox controller...I do not like the whole idea of playing with a keyboard and mouse
SHCP2010 10 months ago
@SHCP2010 yes its true but you will be at a significant disadvantage. I highly recommend getting used to mouse and keyboard controls, you will like it a lot.
TheFriendlyCanadian 10 months ago
@Served001 Daniel said it - if you don't have a good grafic card you can't play that game on PC (32 vs. 32) ... IMO the consoles are even better than the PC's cause the consoles are 5 years old and I think you can't install BF3 with a 5 year old PC ;-)
I'm waiting for my new PS4 ...
cajobe1971 10 months ago
@cajobe1971 Yeah i agree a little but i prefer playing the 32 vs 32 with a good community not to be rude, but most people on consoles are little kids :|
Served001 10 months ago
@Served001 I know what you mean ... I bought a Tritton HS ... so If they cry too loud I mute ;) ... and there aren't many at the PS3's who have HS's. Most of the time I have fun with my friends and kick asses LOL
cajobe1971 10 months ago
@cajobe1971 :D
Served001 10 months ago
@Served001 oi....thats not fair! :'(
LOL787LOL 10 months ago
@LOL787LOL I think that should be... PC hasen't been getting much good things for the past time
Served001 10 months ago
@Served001 pc has got loads of crap that am sure console players wish they had, for example steam, does loads of great offers like just the other day they did boarderlands all of its downloadable for just 7:50$!!, then you got fallout, gta etc which you can mod the crap out, you guys got a never ending list!.
LOL787LOL 10 months ago
@LOL787LOL i know PC is better in some ways but look at some games being made on consoles and actaully working better on consoles look at all the pc exclsuvies going multiplatform. :|
Served001 10 months ago
@LOL787LOL i love steam but its easy to get hacked, i took a break from it i came back 2 weeks later, it got hacked LOL xD
jakevidzz 10 months ago
hey tell your friends, tell them to tell their friends, one million bf3 likes on facebook
will give us an early reveal!!!
XxLAx2th3MaxXx 10 months ago
dang bl1nk is so beast
EcentC 10 months ago
Comment removed
mrsnipercod498 10 months ago
@mrsnipercod498 wut? joke right?
icmrcd2 10 months ago
@icmrcd2 sorry i thought it was on the 14,th the full reveal will be on the 17th. Sorry.
mrsnipercod498 10 months ago
zh1nto > josh olin
EcentC 10 months ago 58
@EcentC DrDisrespect (comm manager for MW3)<above all.
though MW3 is gonna suck
fuclesh 10 months ago
Noice!
Zaxkcy 10 months ago
:D
themiltarydude 10 months ago
First lol...i never thought.
TheePlaceboEffect 10 months ago
@TheePlaceboEffect Very informative vid :)
TheePlaceboEffect 10 months ago