Added: 1 year ago
From: IcedEarth426
Views: 724
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Same place you do TARPLEY! You AGENT! YOU AND ALEX AND RON PAUL ARE ALL INSIDE AGENTS. ID Elect my grandma before Ron!

  • I trusted Wikileaks. I now have a doubt about the whole thing simply because what he said about US's agenda to against China and Russia. The points he has made makes sense such as why the US didn't get Julian Assange by assassination or drone attack which US always does. Why does US allow him to stay in Britain where the government is essentially doing everything it can to help out the US?

  • Tarp you are majoring on the minors, Wiki has done much good up to now and why does that make you so itchy. gezzzzz! send me a video of assange denying 911 or whatever is getting Tarp so spooky.

  • I really laugh also because isn't calling names kinda like having a debate with a five year old..."Now little Johnny you shouldn't hit people" "Well I wanted to you big dumb stupid head". Seriously, Tarpley is well educated and knows alot of information about these topics. And on his Defense he is standing up for 'YOUR rights too. But who cares he is just an Educated loser with knowledge right?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • If assange is such a threat is making public appearances, why wasn't he taken out 4 months ago after the 1st dump? Is the CIA/MI that weak, cmon?!

  • people that buy into what this guy is saying are retards who don't know how to look shit up (read: google something). 9/11 truth is a waste of time for people who jack off to the zeitgeist movies.

  • @SilverscreenSurgeon

    I know this is an old comment but it really made me laugh hard. You claim 9/11 truth is a waste of time, yet you sit here watching a tarpley video about assange and 9/11 truth, then take the time to comment about 9/11 truth. Make up your mind sir, or rather, stick your head back into the sand. Also, on the topic of Zeitgeist, shouldn't you be fapping furiously to Zeitgeist Debunked or some other irrational hitpiece slandering people for thinking outside the box?

    HUGZ 4 U

  • Don't get mad @ Assange he's just a Mindless Manchurian Zombie, we should be looking at who's closest to him , traditionally Mk Ultra kept a handlers close to their slaves.. or perhaps they have new technology to keep them under control, from a distance RFID or whatever , just look into who he's hanging around with, then you'll see whats really good ...

  • I am not missing anything! The point is: Osama (and his terrorists) committed a crime on 9/11, but US solders (under US government) committed crimes in Iraq and Afganistan.

  • @avnerrietti

    No you idiots. A rouge network inside the US caused 9/11, then used the IS military to commit crimes in the world.

  • @avnerrietti There is NO proof for Osama Bin Laden's involvement in 9/11 none at all. The FBI have stated this publicly as have members of the Bush administration. Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the Bali bombings amongst other things but NOT 9/11 you can check the FBI website if you want confirmation of this. 7 of the alleged hijackers have since come forward & are alive and living in their native countries, the BBC to name but one has covered this. Stop relying on the TV for your news.

  • If everyone commits crimes that you are all criminals - and you have no right to tell anyone what, and what no to do.

    "Why was Assange allowed to give public appearances out in the open when he was already big target?"

    What difference does it make? I am just so happy there are people like him that expose government corruption.

  • @avnerrietti This is the point, Assange is sold as anti-establishment, but if you actually bothered to read these so called "leaks" and do a bit of research you would discover that anything apparently damaging to the US to come out of them has already been covered by fringe journalists and is not news. Wikileaks' greatest accomplishments so far have been to bolster the very weak and very dodgy case for a war with Iran and provide justification for censorship of the internet.

  • "Who pays for his lifestyle?" Good question. I would like to know too. But in the mean time I am just so happy there are people like him that expose government corruption.

    "If the Invisible Govt. was truly feeling threatened by this guy, they could have shut him up easily." Yes they can but I think they are woried about public opinion, don't they?

  • @avnerrietti The invisible government are using him. Notice how in all the leaks on Afghanistan there has not even been a mention of the opium trade which has flourished with production increasing 10 fold under US occupation. There has also been no mention whatsoever of the pipeline that was the main reason for the invasion. Does that not seem wierd to you? You think Assange is genuine cause he reveals Hillary's true feelings about Putin's hair cut or some shit? Get real and do some research!

  • "He'd be at a black site or in Guantonemo Bay." Yes! He would be. Would that be fair? Would that be a human thing to do?

    "People that have not even committed any crime at all get harsher treatment than this guy, and we're supposed to believe he's "dangerous"?" Absolutely!!! I am glad you agree that there are innocent people jailed and tortured in Guantanamo.

  • Do you realize that what you are saying isn't making any sense.

    You should be thanking Assange for letting you know the thruth about US government.

  • @avnerrietti I think you are missing the point. Tarpley raises some valid points. Why was Assange allowed to give public appearances out in the open when he was already big target? Who pays for his lifestyle? If the Invisible Govt. was truly feeling threatened by this guy, they could have shut him up easily. He'd be at a black site or in Guantonemo Bay. People that have not even committed any crime at all get harsher treatment than this guy, and we're supposed to believe he's "dangerous"?

  • @IcedEarth426 MABY BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT DOESNT HAVE AS MUCH CONTROL OVER US AS YOU THINK!!!!!

  • @avnerrietti

    What "truth." The Truth is as the govt. wants you to see it. Its a self exposure just like the pentagon papers.

  • @avnerrietti The news outlet being used to put the info into the public domain (NY Times) was also the main stream media champion of the case for the Iraq war. The New York Times assigned John Sanger to oversee the Wikileaks press coverage, a senior CFR member who deals regularly with the current head of the world bank and the former head of the CIA. NONE of the documents are top secret with only 6% being "secret" a level below top secret, which 3 Million individuals have clearance to access.

  • sor to say, no offend, but the images of the heli shooting people without real reason , is insane indeed.. but compared to other things kilings etc it's more baby propaganda.. so many people slaughtered all over the world, in too bizar ways..

    from all sides..  etc etc i'll shut up now :D

  • yup this can be very twisted... 9-11 is 100 % home made. noticed he never dropped even a little sweat... always relaxed and aware.. knowing rules etc etc etc as if nothing indeed can happen to him

    good thinkin.!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more