"during this trip, ETT was evaluated by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, NJT University in Beijing and the Design Institute for The Chinese Ministry of Rail."
I have some bad news for you guys.
During that trip ALL of your IP was copied and stolen by the Chinese.
You have, unknowingly, given away your IP.
If this ever gets off the ground, you won't make a penny.
One bulldozer destroying one pylon of the 4,000 kph line would kill hundreds, contaminate the tube with air, and lower public acceptance just like a dirigible explosion.
The air has to be removed. This requires pumps and energy to remove and keep removed.
It's just too unsafe and the savings in materials just means that it's easier to sabotage.
Absolutely incredible. One suggestion, I think you need to simplify the home page of ET3.com and bullet point the major benefits of ETT with simple stats that the average person can understand, Bejing to New York in 2 hours (I think thats what you said), 20 000 a year saved, profit margins and other major benefits etc etc etc, leave the technical detail for people that want to get deeper into the website.
The capsule slows down to a halt if the breach is large enough. Hatches located every mile or so can be used to exit the tube in case of malfunction. However the probability of any malfuction would be drastically less then the probability for car accidents for example.
I don't know if I've ever seen and idea so over-inflated as this. This is laid on so thick that I started wondering if it was a spoof...on top of being as presumptuous about what the results would be as one could get.
By the way...in some of the illustrations why are the ETT vehicles aerodynamic?
i have been dreaming of new travel technology just recently and here it is already ready to go ... now what is the holdup ? let me guess... greedy politicians and greedy bankers along with control freaks. ET3 would kick the door in and revolutionize travel and plan for even faster more efficient travel now and in the future.
If it's so cheap then why haven't a full scale model being created? This could be possible in 50 years given the current acceleration in technology but the creation of a 5,000 km de-pressured tunnel across several geological fault lines is about as reasonable as free energy.
@newusername01 how so, technology to absorb seismic activity's at key points could be created, like the technology they used to update the golden bridge support. Rubber/metal combination.
This could be done in less then 5 years given the funding for multiple projects at a time around the world.
@Gaby64TZM "how so, technology to absorb seismic activity's at key points could be created, like the technology they used to update the golden bridge support. Rubber/metal combination."
No, this would have to be incorporated along the entire circuit as not only tectonic plates more but foundations which are not placed on bedrock also shift significantly over time. I bet a working model hasn't even being built. Not possible now may be in 50 years.
@newusername01 dont give the in 50 years bullshit, we already have technology to create a secure foundation that will not shift, also considering that its the support itself that will be putting most of the weight on that foundation.
And yes there could be shock absorbers between the support-tube junction.
All that will be needed in seismic prone areas is a rubber/metal alloy that interconnects the tubes and the support. And seismic detection for immediate system response, evacuation prior to
Am I the only one here who is NOT in favour of this?
Did they ever examine the possible detrimental effects on passengers? So we are supposed to easily put 4,000 m/h behind us? And they still need to be powered - how? Am I REALLY the only one who does NOT support yet another gigantomaniac project devised by inveterate advocates of the bigger-better-faster paradigm? Plus, I for one would not for the life of me board such a tube without windows in it or any means of exerting personal control.
@icke11234 grafeno hermano, hay muchos materiales nuevos, hay que enfocarse en lo positivo y esperar los avances de la verdadera ciencia, que es la ciencia colectiva, no del gobierno o grandes empresas
No digo que soy en contra a lo nuevo de por sí. Solo es que me repugna todo lo demasiado tecnocrático. Y es preciso lo que vemos en este vídeo. Es continuación de la gigantomania tan mal sufrida de la elite. Nuevas invenciones, otra vez disharmonicamente y mal empleadas. Hay que haber un modo de integrar las innovaciones fantásticas de una manera igualmente fantástica, sostenible, y en harmonía con el medio ambiente y el bienestar de los seres que lo inhabitan.
@icke11234 Ya no nse puede acostumbrar a la gente a vivir en comubidades pequeñas, la comunicacion alcanzaria su maxima expresion con esto, probablemnte no sea la respuesta, pero es una manera de avanzar mientras se logra la teleportacion cuantica de material biologico compuesto, tendremos que seguir buscando la manera de transportarnos demanera rapida, eficiente, eco-amigable y lo mas barata posible, enfocandonos en lo positivo, parece una my buena respuesta!
@icke11234 yes it has been previously studied, the affects on the passenger are relative to the coefficient between there current speed and the accelerated speed in a second, acceleration could be limited to prevent to much G forces on a human. Yes they do need power but the required power is greatly reduced by the lack of friction, and allot of it can be regenerated from slowing down.
You for one will suffer in the next decade as automation fully takes over. Artificial OLED windows should do.
Your arrogant tone and language are steeped in inhumanity. "You for one will suffer (...)" - thanks for enlightening me! I repeat, I'm not going to board yet another inhumane, tecnocratic experiment devised for would-be future RFID androids like your presumed self, for whom you assume "Artificial OLED windows should do". Rest assured, they will never, ever do for ME.
I have been runnig vacumm systems for over forty years now. If you have one failure at any point in the line. You will end up with the greatest ammount of shit that has ever been seen in the one place. Turn again. J
Mdern video gaming is the only thing that brings future ideas into a reality. Humans in reallife, a.k.a life with slightly better graphics, never seem to make it happen. What ever happened to the supersonic trans-atlantic maglev that was supposed to go across the ocean?
@kzalldaz Don't be so impatient ... LOL. From the "Dawn of Man" up until 1900, the fastest man could travel was <50 mph by train. In, 110 years "short" years, 500 mph (by Comm. Jet) is the routine. 60 years ago the fastest man could travel was approx 400 mph. (WW2 fighter planes). Now we fairly routinely reach escape velocity of 7 miles per second.
At this rate of technological change (if we don't destroy ourselves), that Trans-Atlantic Mag-Lev will be here in 30 years. All it needs is funding.
@grizzzlyjoe I'm sure there will be one in even less than 30 years but why can't they just make similar protective layers and seals that space materials use? That will at least cover the safety department. I'm pretty sure NASA could easily make it a reality with their resources, let alone be a big part of the tube train operation.
@kzalldaz I'm sure they can ... like I said, "All it needs is funding." The global economy is hindering progress. There needs to be a global shift of mankind's "determination" to make Earth a paradise, rather than a hell-hole of starvation, misery and warfare.
you can build one of these from NYC to london the long way round for 500 billion? mad. how thick are the walls on the tubes and what are they made out of?
Now this is the kind of Project where the stimules funds should have gone, we could build 1,000,000 miles of this around the globe within 10 years, this would revolutionise transport and help massivily towards reducing carbon emissions, would also increase the productivity of Labour, create jobs, and boost scientific innovation in other areas.
Before we put people in these things, I would like to see this done for shipping; I think that idea would sell better. It also will help identified potential bugs that will help advance the sytem to handle humans.
I saw the patent for this idea, and it was waaaay back in 1999. Unfortunately for you, your patent is nearly 12 years old. Why would someone pay you for an idea that they can get for free in a few years? I like "free" much better than paying one cent for something!! And, China will take your technology and "improve" it - leaving you nothing. You better hurry if you're gonna' get someone to buy into your dream.
fo you get your own riding compartments or do you buy one? im picturing super messy taxi cabs and what happens if your tube breaks up in vaccum of air you would die. how will you change transport if a section goes down (unlike railroads being super sturdy and airplanes being so high up weather can be a major problem if we have to get it now so bad i don't imagine it will be to weather sturdy from the hurricanes and tornados of the southern US to the earthquakes of japan)
i really do like this idea. may very well be the future on how we get around locally or internationally. the only thing that worries me is what kind of people will be put in charge of monitoring the tubes or even changing the direction of travel (i.e. taking an exit). because if it is anything like the people they put in charge of the D.C. metro or behind the wheel of the cities buses, i would be very uneasy about riding in one of these evacuated tubes.
@KyleAKAHerm Right now you and i (and everyone else) are travelling 67,000mph in orbit around the sun. The sun and entire solar system is orbiting the milky way galaxy at 200,000mph. The milky way is moving about 400k mph. The average human travels hundreds of billions of miles through the evacuated environment of space during their life time. Travel in an evacuated environment is the most proven form of transportation in the universe!
@EvacuatedTubes i guess i didn't understand what "friction free" meant. so if its an evacuated environment wouldn't these transportation capsules have to have some sort of oxygen supply or pressurization?
@KyleAKAHerm The only problem is acceleration. If you go from 1 mph to 1000 mph in 1 s you will die as the g force will be so enourmous your body will be crushed.
With proper acceleration in a vaccum the maximum speed limit is the speed of light.
@pidromonz only tests have been done so far, and they confirm the technical feasibility. There are many political barriers, and only people like you and i (lots of people) can change that by writing letters and informing more people about this. When the first commercial system is built and publicised, growth can be very rapid because almost all of the key technologies, production capacities, parts, and materials are off-the-shelf items.
when i was a child my parents gave me on chrismas a vacum operated railway, it was a capsule that fly under a tube like the electric car track, this 25 years ago.
@leajo47 perhaps some jobs will be displaced, and far more will be created. The surge of the global economy will allow many more people to be able to afford to fly to remote places that will not get ET3 for many years; -- so air travel is likely to increase for a while, as will trucking (to meet the construction needs for all new infrastructure).
This is a really interesting video and I'm 90% into the concept of such transportation. However, what about transportation between residences? Say I want to go to a friend's house, do I still house a car? Also, terrorism, granted I don't believe there's a terrorist in wait everywhere ready to blow up everything, but the possibility is there, ET3 seems quite vulnerable (carbomb + tube = lolnotube) though I suppose it's not that much different than today.
@DewdInTheNewd It will take awhile before most residences are served -- the "last mile" is the most expensive -- until then, think of ET3 as an airport as close as wallmart, and much more convenient due to demand response (no schedules - the capsules wait on the people, not the other way round). Yes all transportation is vulnerable to terror -- fortunately it causes much less than 1% of transportation related death -- if we are concerned about safety let's focus on what is killing 99%.
@noodlesdefyyou The tubes will not be capable of withstanding a nuke blast (what is??). Most transportation modes can be damaged with bullets, fortunately acts of terror constitute less than 1% of transportation fatalities. ET3 focuses on what kills 99% of people who die in transportation mishaps; AND it is also clear that ET3 will offer less exposure to terror (and "acts of God" like meteorite strikes) than cars, jets, ships, and trains. Let's focus on the positive.
@EvacuatedTubes look around Hiroshima/Nagasaki. Even the Chernobyl meltdown left quite a bit of building in tact. Research it. Anyway, my comment was a jest at technology. It would be wonderful tech, however even the simplest of actions can destroy the greatest of achievements. It's also known as Murphy's Law.
The ratweasels have had this sort of technology decades ago. Is it spilling over to us? Maybe....but listen to what he says about prosperity and 'global security' (the operative word, being 'security') Sounds good, but they hate you, and they're coming for you! Sounds too good to be true? You bet your fucking ass! Brave New World my bum! It's gonna be a blast, Sheeple!
Sounds great and all.. But what's stopping anyone from blowing up a portion on the tube. Maybe you can get some Government Aid to have security posts on the tax payers dime.. But even then, this goes through several different countries and countless Government controls.
It is still expensive to create this thing. Perhaps we could develop a new technology to create a vacuum without the use of tubes..it could be possible.. =) i hope...
Interesting post, generating air excluding forcefields is possible. According to our limited knowledge in generating and maintaining an air tight energy field, it would most likely cost far more and use more energy to maintain a forcefield evacuated environment than to use the simple tube infrastructure we advocate. Perhaps you can find a way to accomplish your vision. ET3 infrastructure cost is about 1/4th the cost of a freeway, or 1/15th the cost of High Speed Rail (HSR).
@EvacuatedTubes Hello, I am confused by your use of The Venus Project imagery in conjunction with narration about patriotism, protected IP, profit, and investment - these things are not at all related or compatible, in fact they are opposites. Please could you explain, this. Do you see this as a monetary investment that will help to "prop-up" the global economy, or something which can help to make monetary economics obsolete and therefore a route towards an RBE?
@TZMReadingJay After learning about ET3, Jacques and Roxanne of TVP suggested that ET3 be mentioned in TZA movie as it was being made, this video returns the favor by mentioning TVP. Much of the world has been a RBE for thousands of years. Ideal money systems allocate resources according to supply and demand. The resource that dominates our economy is energy; but the world is transitioning from a RBE to a TBE (tech based economy). IP makes RBE efficient, ET3 will multiply this.
@EvacuatedTubes I think you misunderstand what RBE means. It means Resource-Based Economy - which is a society designed around the available resources and our ability to manipulate and distribute them (using technology) in order to serve the population based primarily on need - without the concept of money, debt, barter or trade. We are not currently in a RBE we are currently in a monetary based economy, the concept of Intellectual Property does not exist in an RBE.
@TZMReadingJay We have always had a RBE -- (money is more efficient distribution tech than barter). If Fresco believed in no IP, his DVDs would be a free download... people would provide labor, and materials... and his 40 year old project would now cover half of Florida. TVP's "social engineering" is just Marxism - "from each according to ability, for each according to need". Truth is "commune tech" has not done very well. Let's use the best techs (like ET3) to enjoy Fresco's vision.
@EvacuatedTubes I am using Jacque Fresco's definition of RBE, which does not involve any form of money, trade, barter, debt, or servitude. We cannot have a meaningful discussion when we clearly have different understandings of the term RBE, please can you provide your definition? I agree that TVP is similar to Marxism, but today's technology allow us to envision a better society than even Marx could dream of - 'ability' and 'need' are too vague and subjective, we can do even better.
Changing the definition of common words can allow anyone to prevail in any discussion. The global economy IS based on resources, therefore we already have a RBE (that incrementally improves with tech). I like elements of Fresco's future vision, and artwork, a Marxist path to realize it is unrealistic.
TVP calls for a totalitarian determination of "needs" made by a "central computer". We prefer decentralized market transparency, ET3 will greatly amplify what the net did.
@EvacuatedTubes I wish not to prevail, merely to understand, I'm happy to use different terminology if you don't agree with Jacque's definition of RBE. So I ask my original question again using different terminology: Do you see ET3 as a monetary investment that will help to "prop-up" the global monetary economy, or something which can help to make monetary economics obsolete and therefore a route towards a civilized egalitarian society with no money/war/politics, just global human co-operation?
@TZMReadingJay We do not seek to prop up what is built on a faulty foundation and not worth saving. What cannot be transformed into value should be allowed to fail; potentially valuable things should be supported until they thrive. Much of the economy is based on resources. A universal resource is energy, so it could be said that we are in an “EBE” (energy based economy), and energy backs money. We see transport as the most basic resource, with ET3 transportation will not depend on Energy.
@TZMReadingJay 'Global human cooperation'; is rapidly improving with technology. The process of “civilization” caused war death rates to decline for all recorded history. “Politics” is negotiating differences in opinion about how resources get allocated. When asked “who would decide resource allocation?”, Fresco replies “a computer”. Who programs the computer? We see the Internet (and money) as such a “computer”. ET3 will greatly advance allocation computing efficiency and “civilization”.
We have always had a RBE -- (money is more efficient distribution tech than barter). If Fresco believed in no IP, his DVDs would be a free download... people would provide labor, and materials... and his 40 year old project would now cover half of Florida. TVP's "social engineering" is just Marxism - "from each according to ability, for each according to need". Truth is "commune tech" has not done very well. Let's use the best techs (like ET3) to enjoy Fresco's vision.
There's always a country welling to put this technology in too work, who ever achieves first well advance too the next stage of life. Chaos well fade and Zen
well clear the mind so it focuses on more technological advances for the well being of
human kind and for the healing of mother earth to begin. no more oil use, city smog pollution. More parks and places for people to interact, instead of streets ,cars,honking horns, smell of gasoline and traffic being in the way.
Cool idea. But appearently it also heals AIDS, is able to get rid of fundamentalism, secures feeding for billions and also denies corruption of any form.
What I'm saying:
It's a great concept, but don't blow it up with patriotism and exaggerated positivism.
thank you for sharing,... good info could actually be possible riight now,... but here in europe they invest in stupid old railways :( like ave ..of course expensive and subsidised by the EU taxpayer ....
It could be a second revolution after the net. Internet in the last years contributed to combine several cultures, this new sistem can physically combine people...and the psychological effect of this would be magnificent...
They better get cracking at building this technology soon, I'm sick to death of airports, customs and flying for 18 hours in a cramped seat next to total strangers. One could go on touring the world at their leisure, without shitty airline food.
Love ETT tech & the derivative maglev train option as well.
People who claim TZM or TVP is Socialism have no clue what they're talking about & are project their own bias on us.
Here are just 2 of the many differences: Socialism uses money & is about HUGE government controlling people. TVP is about no money & local systems governing themselves using technology (more than flawed people) to service basic human needs.
Drastically different concepts, so no, it's not Socialism.
Yes, I made this video for my friend Daryl Oster who owns the patents and is perhaps, the world's foremost expert on ET3 (Evacuate Tube Transport Technologies.
Im opposed to the use of this technology to maintain a monetary system or the status quo. The idea that this technology can prop up the economys is fullish. All it will do is further unemployment by reducing the existing number of occupations. The only way a monetary system could exist with this technology is population reduction. Which is wicked in every way imaginable. A labor in exchange for goods and services system of living is no longer realistic. And to think so is delusional.
@Limeisback2012 If it is true that technology can't prop up the economy, we would all be living like cave men basic survival no economy at all. Technology IS the economy. This has bee true since cave men discovered the technologies of: fire making, flint napping, and camel riding.
@EvacuatedTubes (@Limeisback2012) No, technology in and of itself can stimulate the economy. But one factor is detremental to the free market: Automation, which is an inevitable side effect of technology, and it is implemented in the hope to furthermore maximise profits. And it does - in the short term - BUT: Automation ultimately leads to less jobs, therefore less purchesing power for the people. This is the cycle of technologycal unemployment. See ZM Orientation Presentation for more info.
@W1z3k Or it means more people can do more productive things. I mean if you take what you say to be the truth than farmers shouldn't use tractor instead they should have more farmhands and animals to till the land or we shouldn't use trucks to haul things that we could carrier ourselves just there would be more jobs
@Darkwizzrobe If you think I said this, you shouls re-read what I wrote. Otherwise, you are completely right. Today this is true: We can either have regulated technological decline (people doing things by hand which machines could do easily, hence there are more jobs) or everincreasing technological unemployment. The latter happens is in a truly free market, the former in a somewhat regulated one. But in this system, these are the only choices we have really. Or we can implement another system..
agreed......the wohle system serves only to ensalve us anyway .... the people could dedicate themseves to their own creativity instead of following mindless jobs.
This technology was conceived, by engineer inventor Henri Coanda in 1930. Name technology is AEROTUBEXPRES. For more details, search Wikipedia Henri Coanda.
@marinohell AEROTUBEXPRES (ATE) was proposed as a Pneumatic Tube Transport (PTT) system where the vehicles are propelled by pressure difference (like at drive up banks). AET (a form of PTT) will not reduce friction like ETT. The first PTT system was BUILT in NYC by Beach (the editor of Scientific American) in the 1800s long before Coanda's proposal. Coanda was a brilliant aerodynamics, I am impressed with Coanda Effect airfoils, and NOTAR helicopters made possible by Coanda's work.
A very useful technology indeed. I reckon it could also be used for a central distribution system; seamlessly transporting goods on demand. This is truly wonderful news. I totally support its implementation. I hope it survives opposition from the big automobile industry and big oil. This technology makes sense!
i absolutely love this idea! i must interject however, i noticed a "venus project" snapshot in there towards the end. zeitgeist does provide accurate information as far as how things are working financially, and it exposes the corruption (federal reserve, ect.) but the solution they offer is socialism. the religious portions of it have been debunked too. venus=lucifer. don't be deceived. i love your videos though. you do an excellent job. one of my favorite channels for sure. =)
I'm not even sure that this is worth responding to. But, Venus = Lucifer? How about NO. I'm sorry, but the concept of Venus was around for 1000's of years before Lucifer was ever thought of. Here you've built a logical fallacy called "False Dichotomy.". The two figures you suggested are not in any way related, regardless of how much you think so.
Furthermore, what do you have against socialism? You're the one spitting around words like "Lucifer", so it should interest you to know that Jesus was the greatest socialist of all time. Now get off you right wing hook and join the rest of us in the 21st century. Good day.
watch zietgeist and the debunking of zietgeist then you'll get it. no thats not what this video is about exactly but the same people behind the venus project are the same people who destroyed our economy. the idea is to destroy the old and create "the new world order." order out of chaos. here's utopia! just give up your sovereignty. remember hitler? lucifer aka the bearer of light is at times embodied as venus btw. do your homework or keep grazing with the rest of the sheeple. lol...
you don't have a goddamn clue woman. odds are, you don't know you're rights. you can't tell the difference between common law and admiralty law. you think the government is here to help you? hahaha... they stage wars for profit. they run drugs. join you in the 21st century? no thanks i prefer paying cash, growing my own food, and walking around free of of RFID chips. you enjoy your GMO food and fluorinated water lady. really... hahaha. you liberals are the new obama youth huh? HIEL OBAMA!!
Go ahead and keep shooting, man. Keep on assuming my position, and then insist I defend it. You'll find that you'll never hit the target, because you're shooting at a ghost. You're very good at building assumptions, unfortunately when you assume you make an ass out of you and me.
Zeitgeist religious section debunked, huh? By whom, I would ask - which is a question I know the answer to. Christian apologists! Of course they'd say that Jesus isn't Horus, it'd refute their entire belief system.
And you can grow your own food if you want, as long as you don't mind the arsenic poisoning, and you can drink unfiltered water too, as long as you don't mind mercurial poisoning. The only way the earth can repair its self and sustain life is if we embrace technology to its fullest. Utilize hydroponic aeroponic technology in order to mass produce foods in skyscrapers. Take our farms in doors. Doing this will allow the earth to heal its self. Not that religious people care about saving the planet
And, go ahead and maintain your false dichotomy. I'm sure you'll maintain your bogus belief that ancient pagan beliefs and Lucifer are connected when indeed the entire idea and concept of lucifer its self is an amalgamation of older belief systems. The idea of the after life, and punishment in the afterlife, are firmly Zoroastrian, Babylonian, Mesopotamian, and even Sumerian belief structures. You can keep believing in the testimony of goat herders, but prepare to be laughed out of the room.
@nwothugslayerboi We visited the Venus Project in Florida, and found the founder Jacques Fresco to be very productive and lucid in his 90s he is a brilliant designer and futurist whom I have great respect for, and we can agree to disagree on politics. We at et3 are not associated with the Zeitgeist movement, yet we are pleased that they recognize the value of ETT, and are thankful to Jacques for introducing them to ETT, and for including ETT briefly in the Zeitgeist movie.
@nwothugslayerboi This is in response to Zeitgeist as ETT is not portrayed correctly; ETT does NOT operate like trains, ETT operates like a freeway. While the ZA and the Venus Project are linked with political ideology, et3 and ETT are neutral. ETT fits in most political climates because transportation is a universal need. We are focused on private implementation of ETT with ownership incentives because that is what usually achieves the quickest global adoption of new technologies.
@EvacuatedTubes (@nwothugslayerboi) TVP is not a political movement. It may be misunderstood as such by many, but in fact it's simply not. Furthermore, I very much like that you were influenced by TVP, and as such, you should be aware 2 facts: (1) Technoloical advencement is useless unless it brings about positive social change, (2) The more cheap automation you have the less healthy the monetary system will get due to technological unemployement. In the end, this is also a move towards TVP.
@EvacuatedTubes How far have you got with private implementation? With all the clear benefits, why aren't we riding it already, do the current transport mogols want to give up such a big slice of the pie? or is this project already underway? In a resource based economy, this would have been realized yesterday, and you'd already be working on v2.0. Be Tesla's, not Morgans
@EvacuatedTubes The Venus Project and The Zeitgeist Movement are NOT political, they want to remove all government. Decisions will be arrived at by looking at all the facts and the best solution will be implemented, no one will use OPINIONS or MONEY to make decisions as done today. I love the concept of safe, fast, clean transportation. It's also logical to implement it. But because of money and personal interests, we don't have it right now.
You're using "socialism" very broadly. TVP is not like anything that has ever been tried. No money, no leaders, no ownership, no prison's, no servitude. Knee-jerk reactions to these ideas are expected, but it is thoroughly thought out and backed by science. Don't take my word for it. This is not something that can happen overnight, of course. It will take a change in values.
As for the "venus=lucifer" claim -- it's called The VENUS Project because it BEGAN in VENUS, Florida!
TZM does not condone or promote socialism. Socialism still requires labour, money and government involvement. If you even bothered to read anything about The Zeitgeist Movement you would know that their proposed system, along with The Venus Project does not require any of those things.
Please educate yourself a little more before you spout off your ignorance.
When you are traveling in a car at 70mph down the highway can you feel anything? No...
Velocity is relative. Force = Mass x Acceleration
Acceleration is change in velocity. (speed up or slow down) you only feel a force when there is acceleration (F=ma) like when you press on the accelerator (gas) or the brakes.
Also when you go around a turn you experience centripetal force (F=mv^2/r) so you would have to make the tubes very straight... These are the only physical limitations though.
It's easy - Remember how they're Evacuated Air Tubes? With all the air sucked out of the tubes, it's almost like a micro-gravity environment. There's no friction, no pressures involved in the traveling process. Therefore there's no chance for going squish when you come to a sudden stop from traveling at high velocities.
You can still get bsquished against the inside of the Vehicle. Take a look at the new Haethrow Unmanned transport POds for a system that is in use, and real. That could be the future of Urban transport or Delivery
Yeah bro, I had this idea too when I was 17. Then I realized that at the speeds involved the slightest change in direction would pancake the entire passenger cabin against the wall. Also, if you want to get mainstream recognition for your proposal you probably shouldn't post it as a reply to a fucking Zeitgeist conspiracy theory video on Youtube.
u mean when you were 17 ,you discovered it all? oh,i wish u were here to kik u in face. have you heard about step bye step technology improvment.
u idiot never could imagine that we can have internet and mobile one day.to find out that idea in 17 needs fantasy ,no negativ person like u have fantasy,just shut up
Ett will exist in a short matter of time, it's not a question of resources or money, but of global human consciousness! Let it be called, The peace on earth tube
Well actually the "news" won't listen... Every time someone tries to even talk about ufology they all turn to skeptics and just start laughing.
Get huge groups of people, thousands. Migrate to the white house and demand the truth. I've never seen anything like this tried, and if everyone truly cares as much as they say I don't see why it's not done.
As for me, I am only 16 years of age. I can't do much, but that doesn't mean I'm not going to try.
You all should watch zeitgeist 2. What "terrorists" are, who invented the term, and if they really exist is mentioned somewhere in there. A lot of other great theories which are most likely true are also mentioned.
small problem with a monorail type traveling system that is connect on two or more different countries...what about the continual expansion of the planet Earth?
It is my understanding that the Planet Earth, along with almost every other planet, is growing in size thus causing the continents to shift further apart from each other...An intercontinental tube traveling system seems to be asking for disaster
You are correct that earth movement, growth, or shrinkage is an important consideration for ETT. The patent document discloses several ways to mitigate this issue - such as expansion joints. Thank you for your pertinent comment.
wow, this is awesome. I hope this is in place in my Life time. Would be cool to travel that way.
ThisFlat 2 months ago
Crude in comparison to The Venus Project,but a good try.
Enzo2284 3 months ago
"during this trip, ETT was evaluated by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, NJT University in Beijing and the Design Institute for The Chinese Ministry of Rail."
I have some bad news for you guys.
During that trip ALL of your IP was copied and stolen by the Chinese.
You have, unknowingly, given away your IP.
If this ever gets off the ground, you won't make a penny.
Knepperify1 3 months ago
One bulldozer destroying one pylon of the 4,000 kph line would kill hundreds, contaminate the tube with air, and lower public acceptance just like a dirigible explosion.
The air has to be removed. This requires pumps and energy to remove and keep removed.
It's just too unsafe and the savings in materials just means that it's easier to sabotage.
Knepperify1 3 months ago
Problem with such speeds is that the distance between stations is necessarily very large due to deceleration and acceleration times and distances.
This would only be useful for trips of 1000km+ or greater. n
Transcontinental or transoceanic voyages only.
Boston to NYC or Atlanta to Chicago out of the question.
Knepperify1 3 months ago
Absolutely incredible. One suggestion, I think you need to simplify the home page of ET3.com and bullet point the major benefits of ETT with simple stats that the average person can understand, Bejing to New York in 2 hours (I think thats what you said), 20 000 a year saved, profit margins and other major benefits etc etc etc, leave the technical detail for people that want to get deeper into the website.
username102030405 3 months ago
@username102030405 ahh I just saw that you do have that...in the flash part, I think it should be a far bigger focal point though, in text.
username102030405 3 months ago
Okay, maybe I'm odd man out as usual....but don't we need to slow things down a bit and not speed things up.
dreamconscious 3 months ago
5:35 two tier tube.
BatusaiJack 4 months ago
Thank you for the upload!
timboslice001 4 months ago in playlist ET3
Remove profit from the equation and that would be a truly brilliant future.
TheUnchainedMind 4 months ago
What happens if the tube springs a leak?
hanGun61 4 months ago
@hanGun61
The capsule slows down to a halt if the breach is large enough. Hatches located every mile or so can be used to exit the tube in case of malfunction. However the probability of any malfuction would be drastically less then the probability for car accidents for example.
TheUnchainedMind 4 months ago
How about doing a video that actually goes with the audio? This video is terrible.
bunnyrabbitorama 4 months ago
I don't know if I've ever seen and idea so over-inflated as this. This is laid on so thick that I started wondering if it was a spoof...on top of being as presumptuous about what the results would be as one could get.
By the way...in some of the illustrations why are the ETT vehicles aerodynamic?
randommagnum 6 months ago
@randommagnum
lol that's a good question. i think it's because they just expanded on the current maglev trains which are shaped in that way.
25alo2514m 6 months ago
14 people think vacuum is only something that cleans the carpet.
DeweyDuck420 7 months ago
dude what hasnt this been built yet?
Future0331 7 months ago
i have been dreaming of new travel technology just recently and here it is already ready to go ... now what is the holdup ? let me guess... greedy politicians and greedy bankers along with control freaks. ET3 would kick the door in and revolutionize travel and plan for even faster more efficient travel now and in the future.
blitzen762 7 months ago
Why can we not all work together so that things like this could be possible. Why do this in 10 years when we can start make this work now :(
TheOhsnapppp 8 months ago
Futurama By Matt Groening?
zorzet85 8 months ago
If it's so cheap then why haven't a full scale model being created? This could be possible in 50 years given the current acceleration in technology but the creation of a 5,000 km de-pressured tunnel across several geological fault lines is about as reasonable as free energy.
newusername01 8 months ago
@newusername01 how so, technology to absorb seismic activity's at key points could be created, like the technology they used to update the golden bridge support. Rubber/metal combination.
This could be done in less then 5 years given the funding for multiple projects at a time around the world.
Gaby64TZM 7 months ago
@Gaby64TZM "how so, technology to absorb seismic activity's at key points could be created, like the technology they used to update the golden bridge support. Rubber/metal combination."
No, this would have to be incorporated along the entire circuit as not only tectonic plates more but foundations which are not placed on bedrock also shift significantly over time. I bet a working model hasn't even being built. Not possible now may be in 50 years.
newusername01 7 months ago
@newusername01 dont give the in 50 years bullshit, we already have technology to create a secure foundation that will not shift, also considering that its the support itself that will be putting most of the weight on that foundation.
And yes there could be shock absorbers between the support-tube junction.
All that will be needed in seismic prone areas is a rubber/metal alloy that interconnects the tubes and the support. And seismic detection for immediate system response, evacuation prior to
Gaby64TZM 7 months ago
anyone else randomly hear futurama theme song while listening to this?
SkandranonOwens 8 months ago
Am I the only one here who is NOT in favour of this?
Did they ever examine the possible detrimental effects on passengers? So we are supposed to easily put 4,000 m/h behind us? And they still need to be powered - how? Am I REALLY the only one who does NOT support yet another gigantomaniac project devised by inveterate advocates of the bigger-better-faster paradigm? Plus, I for one would not for the life of me board such a tube without windows in it or any means of exerting personal control.
icke11234 9 months ago
@icke11234 grafeno hermano, hay muchos materiales nuevos, hay que enfocarse en lo positivo y esperar los avances de la verdadera ciencia, que es la ciencia colectiva, no del gobierno o grandes empresas
prosenko 8 months ago
@prosenko
No digo que soy en contra a lo nuevo de por sí. Solo es que me repugna todo lo demasiado tecnocrático. Y es preciso lo que vemos en este vídeo. Es continuación de la gigantomania tan mal sufrida de la elite. Nuevas invenciones, otra vez disharmonicamente y mal empleadas. Hay que haber un modo de integrar las innovaciones fantásticas de una manera igualmente fantástica, sostenible, y en harmonía con el medio ambiente y el bienestar de los seres que lo inhabitan.
icke11234 8 months ago
@icke11234 Ya no nse puede acostumbrar a la gente a vivir en comubidades pequeñas, la comunicacion alcanzaria su maxima expresion con esto, probablemnte no sea la respuesta, pero es una manera de avanzar mientras se logra la teleportacion cuantica de material biologico compuesto, tendremos que seguir buscando la manera de transportarnos demanera rapida, eficiente, eco-amigable y lo mas barata posible, enfocandonos en lo positivo, parece una my buena respuesta!
prosenko 8 months ago
@icke11234 yes it has been previously studied, the affects on the passenger are relative to the coefficient between there current speed and the accelerated speed in a second, acceleration could be limited to prevent to much G forces on a human. Yes they do need power but the required power is greatly reduced by the lack of friction, and allot of it can be regenerated from slowing down.
You for one will suffer in the next decade as automation fully takes over. Artificial OLED windows should do.
Gaby64TZM 7 months ago
@Gaby64TZM
Your arrogant tone and language are steeped in inhumanity. "You for one will suffer (...)" - thanks for enlightening me! I repeat, I'm not going to board yet another inhumane, tecnocratic experiment devised for would-be future RFID androids like your presumed self, for whom you assume "Artificial OLED windows should do". Rest assured, they will never, ever do for ME.
icke11234 7 months ago
@icke11234 you are welcome, the machines wont mind doing you over, welcome to the collective.
I sure am welcoming the technological transhuman evolution and our efficiency will assure that nature selects us over normal humans for survival.
Gaby64TZM 7 months ago
@Gaby64TZM
If nature was to choose, I fear it wouldn't exactly give preference to transhumans, but I wish you much luck, anyway.
icke11234 7 months ago
I have been runnig vacumm systems for over forty years now. If you have one failure at any point in the line. You will end up with the greatest ammount of shit that has ever been seen in the one place. Turn again. J
leydenjohn 9 months ago
Mdern video gaming is the only thing that brings future ideas into a reality. Humans in reallife, a.k.a life with slightly better graphics, never seem to make it happen. What ever happened to the supersonic trans-atlantic maglev that was supposed to go across the ocean?
kzalldaz 10 months ago
@kzalldaz Don't be so impatient ... LOL. From the "Dawn of Man" up until 1900, the fastest man could travel was <50 mph by train. In, 110 years "short" years, 500 mph (by Comm. Jet) is the routine. 60 years ago the fastest man could travel was approx 400 mph. (WW2 fighter planes). Now we fairly routinely reach escape velocity of 7 miles per second.
At this rate of technological change (if we don't destroy ourselves), that Trans-Atlantic Mag-Lev will be here in 30 years. All it needs is funding.
grizzzlyjoe 9 months ago
@kzalldaz .... I take that back ... in 30 years, we'll be using "anti-gravity" ... how fast can a UFO travel around the globe???
grizzzlyjoe 9 months ago
@grizzzlyjoe I'm sure there will be one in even less than 30 years but why can't they just make similar protective layers and seals that space materials use? That will at least cover the safety department. I'm pretty sure NASA could easily make it a reality with their resources, let alone be a big part of the tube train operation.
kzalldaz 9 months ago
@kzalldaz I'm sure they can ... like I said, "All it needs is funding." The global economy is hindering progress. There needs to be a global shift of mankind's "determination" to make Earth a paradise, rather than a hell-hole of starvation, misery and warfare.
grizzzlyjoe 9 months ago
you can build one of these from NYC to london the long way round for 500 billion? mad. how thick are the walls on the tubes and what are they made out of?
chillz27 10 months ago
@chillz27 great r chillzz great ontrivutio this looks excelletn fantasitc
Mattamafias 10 months ago
You should work together with the Venus Project. Together maybe you will do ti! Good luck. We need your system.
lightsout9999 10 months ago
People have brilliant ideas yet no one seems to be listening!!!
SirFact 10 months ago
I hope to see a new world one day, in which we don't corrupt the envoirment but use technology such as this.
darkpepijn 10 months ago
Would it be a public transportation? Or would you own your own capsule or how would that side of ownership work for the system?
BackyardDirectors 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is amazing. This could truly change everything.
amigodemoose 10 months ago
This is amazing. This could truly change everything.
amigodemoose 10 months ago
Now this is the kind of Project where the stimules funds should have gone, we could build 1,000,000 miles of this around the globe within 10 years, this would revolutionise transport and help massivily towards reducing carbon emissions, would also increase the productivity of Labour, create jobs, and boost scientific innovation in other areas.
AwakenFromTheSlumber 10 months ago
10 people who disliked, are major oil company workers
platinum108 11 months ago 3
Before we put people in these things, I would like to see this done for shipping; I think that idea would sell better. It also will help identified potential bugs that will help advance the sytem to handle humans.
paxmanchris 11 months ago
I saw the patent for this idea, and it was waaaay back in 1999. Unfortunately for you, your patent is nearly 12 years old. Why would someone pay you for an idea that they can get for free in a few years? I like "free" much better than paying one cent for something!! And, China will take your technology and "improve" it - leaving you nothing. You better hurry if you're gonna' get someone to buy into your dream.
mortonman1001 11 months ago
Magnificent. But my guess is we won't see something like this for the next couple hundred years, barring something Big happening.
pelicane136 11 months ago
I wants!
waveskissourfeet 11 months ago
This is essentially the tubes from futurama.
xXWindG0dXx 11 months ago
fo you get your own riding compartments or do you buy one? im picturing super messy taxi cabs and what happens if your tube breaks up in vaccum of air you would die. how will you change transport if a section goes down (unlike railroads being super sturdy and airplanes being so high up weather can be a major problem if we have to get it now so bad i don't imagine it will be to weather sturdy from the hurricanes and tornados of the southern US to the earthquakes of japan)
sneakdagger 11 months ago
Oh and what happens when/if the tube is punctured?
Butmunch666 11 months ago
How fast do the pads accelerate?
Butmunch666 11 months ago
i really do like this idea. may very well be the future on how we get around locally or internationally. the only thing that worries me is what kind of people will be put in charge of monitoring the tubes or even changing the direction of travel (i.e. taking an exit). because if it is anything like the people they put in charge of the D.C. metro or behind the wheel of the cities buses, i would be very uneasy about riding in one of these evacuated tubes.
ChefAid87 1 year ago
in theory, wouldn't the velocity of going 4000mph be a little too much for the average person to handle?
KyleAKAHerm 1 year ago
@KyleAKAHerm Right now you and i (and everyone else) are travelling 67,000mph in orbit around the sun. The sun and entire solar system is orbiting the milky way galaxy at 200,000mph. The milky way is moving about 400k mph. The average human travels hundreds of billions of miles through the evacuated environment of space during their life time. Travel in an evacuated environment is the most proven form of transportation in the universe!
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago 11
@EvacuatedTubes i guess i didn't understand what "friction free" meant. so if its an evacuated environment wouldn't these transportation capsules have to have some sort of oxygen supply or pressurization?
KyleAKAHerm 1 year ago
@KyleAKAHerm The only problem is acceleration. If you go from 1 mph to 1000 mph in 1 s you will die as the g force will be so enourmous your body will be crushed.
With proper acceleration in a vaccum the maximum speed limit is the speed of light.
Butmunch666 11 months ago
@KyleAKAHerm Not at all!! You could travel at speed of light with no problem.. What kills people is acceleration.
So, if train slowly accelerates, it should have no any negative effect on people..
deathfake1 2 months ago
@KyleAKAHerm watch?v=rMmbStKzfWk The whole video is awesome but watch from 6:35 to acquire the answer to your question
nistyboy32 2 months ago
@KyleAKAHerm Speed is not the issue, it's acceleration.
scott98390 2 weeks ago
when will the project start to be built?
pidromonz 1 year ago
@pidromonz only tests have been done so far, and they confirm the technical feasibility. There are many political barriers, and only people like you and i (lots of people) can change that by writing letters and informing more people about this. When the first commercial system is built and publicised, growth can be very rapid because almost all of the key technologies, production capacities, parts, and materials are off-the-shelf items.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
@EvacuatedTubes this would be built instant if we had a resource based economy , not money based... sad world we live in
pidromonz 1 year ago
@EvacuatedTubes
when i was a child my parents gave me on chrismas a vacum operated railway, it was a capsule that fly under a tube like the electric car track, this 25 years ago.
MICMECMEXICALI 10 months ago
what about all the jobs in transportation? train divers airline pilots vehicle manufacturers etc, won't they all be lost?
leajo47 1 year ago
@leajo47 perhaps some jobs will be displaced, and far more will be created. The surge of the global economy will allow many more people to be able to afford to fly to remote places that will not get ET3 for many years; -- so air travel is likely to increase for a while, as will trucking (to meet the construction needs for all new infrastructure).
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
How can ANYONE dislike this!? This has ridiculous potential for epic!
Redcom001 1 year ago 8
@Redcom001 we are in CO now and look forward to meeting the EPIC teams that are working on this!
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
This is a really interesting video and I'm 90% into the concept of such transportation. However, what about transportation between residences? Say I want to go to a friend's house, do I still house a car? Also, terrorism, granted I don't believe there's a terrorist in wait everywhere ready to blow up everything, but the possibility is there, ET3 seems quite vulnerable (carbomb + tube = lolnotube) though I suppose it's not that much different than today.
DewdInTheNewd 1 year ago
@DewdInTheNewd It will take awhile before most residences are served -- the "last mile" is the most expensive -- until then, think of ET3 as an airport as close as wallmart, and much more convenient due to demand response (no schedules - the capsules wait on the people, not the other way round). Yes all transportation is vulnerable to terror -- fortunately it causes much less than 1% of transportation related death -- if we are concerned about safety let's focus on what is killing 99%.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
these tubes will be built to withstand a nuclear blast, yet get destroyed by a single pebble. ...flung at 4000 mph.
noodlesdefyyou 1 year ago
@noodlesdefyyou The tubes will not be capable of withstanding a nuke blast (what is??). Most transportation modes can be damaged with bullets, fortunately acts of terror constitute less than 1% of transportation fatalities. ET3 focuses on what kills 99% of people who die in transportation mishaps; AND it is also clear that ET3 will offer less exposure to terror (and "acts of God" like meteorite strikes) than cars, jets, ships, and trains. Let's focus on the positive.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago 6
@EvacuatedTubes look around Hiroshima/Nagasaki. Even the Chernobyl meltdown left quite a bit of building in tact. Research it. Anyway, my comment was a jest at technology. It would be wonderful tech, however even the simplest of actions can destroy the greatest of achievements. It's also known as Murphy's Law.
noodlesdefyyou 11 months ago
I am not optimist.
FemptMurderOrgy666 1 year ago
This has disaster written ALLLL over it!! haha
gnarkill585 1 year ago
yeah don't see it happening in our lifetime...
jigsaw99 1 year ago
The ratweasels have had this sort of technology decades ago. Is it spilling over to us? Maybe....but listen to what he says about prosperity and 'global security' (the operative word, being 'security') Sounds good, but they hate you, and they're coming for you! Sounds too good to be true? You bet your fucking ass! Brave New World my bum! It's gonna be a blast, Sheeple!
bigkitten 1 year ago
Anyone else thinking "Gundam 00 Space Elevators" watching this? lol
Sounds far fetched, but give or take 50-100 years and watch it actually happen some day.
Shippoyasha 1 year ago
So... the internet IS a series of tubes?
mgschutze 1 year ago
Sounds great and all.. But what's stopping anyone from blowing up a portion on the tube. Maybe you can get some Government Aid to have security posts on the tax payers dime.. But even then, this goes through several different countries and countless Government controls.
xGibsonx 1 year ago
A tube is one of nature's constructs like the dome and sphere. Well done.
aeroseth2k 1 year ago
why u fucking sick ppl mix everything with religion? care about tecnology
then u unusful ppl can go to a church in china in 2 houre ineastead for take our money for more coste trip.
orchid79ful 1 year ago
It is still expensive to create this thing. Perhaps we could develop a new technology to create a vacuum without the use of tubes..it could be possible.. =) i hope...
jamestakeshi 1 year ago
@jamestakeshi
Interesting post, generating air excluding forcefields is possible. According to our limited knowledge in generating and maintaining an air tight energy field, it would most likely cost far more and use more energy to maintain a forcefield evacuated environment than to use the simple tube infrastructure we advocate. Perhaps you can find a way to accomplish your vision. ET3 infrastructure cost is about 1/4th the cost of a freeway, or 1/15th the cost of High Speed Rail (HSR).
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
@EvacuatedTubes Hello, I am confused by your use of The Venus Project imagery in conjunction with narration about patriotism, protected IP, profit, and investment - these things are not at all related or compatible, in fact they are opposites. Please could you explain, this. Do you see this as a monetary investment that will help to "prop-up" the global economy, or something which can help to make monetary economics obsolete and therefore a route towards an RBE?
TZMReadingJay 1 year ago
@TZMReadingJay After learning about ET3, Jacques and Roxanne of TVP suggested that ET3 be mentioned in TZA movie as it was being made, this video returns the favor by mentioning TVP. Much of the world has been a RBE for thousands of years. Ideal money systems allocate resources according to supply and demand. The resource that dominates our economy is energy; but the world is transitioning from a RBE to a TBE (tech based economy). IP makes RBE efficient, ET3 will multiply this.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
@EvacuatedTubes I think you misunderstand what RBE means. It means Resource-Based Economy - which is a society designed around the available resources and our ability to manipulate and distribute them (using technology) in order to serve the population based primarily on need - without the concept of money, debt, barter or trade. We are not currently in a RBE we are currently in a monetary based economy, the concept of Intellectual Property does not exist in an RBE.
TZMReadingJay 1 year ago
@TZMReadingJay We have always had a RBE -- (money is more efficient distribution tech than barter). If Fresco believed in no IP, his DVDs would be a free download... people would provide labor, and materials... and his 40 year old project would now cover half of Florida. TVP's "social engineering" is just Marxism - "from each according to ability, for each according to need". Truth is "commune tech" has not done very well. Let's use the best techs (like ET3) to enjoy Fresco's vision.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
@EvacuatedTubes I am using Jacque Fresco's definition of RBE, which does not involve any form of money, trade, barter, debt, or servitude. We cannot have a meaningful discussion when we clearly have different understandings of the term RBE, please can you provide your definition? I agree that TVP is similar to Marxism, but today's technology allow us to envision a better society than even Marx could dream of - 'ability' and 'need' are too vague and subjective, we can do even better.
TZMReadingJay 1 year ago
@TZMReadingJay
Changing the definition of common words can allow anyone to prevail in any discussion. The global economy IS based on resources, therefore we already have a RBE (that incrementally improves with tech). I like elements of Fresco's future vision, and artwork, a Marxist path to realize it is unrealistic.
TVP calls for a totalitarian determination of "needs" made by a "central computer". We prefer decentralized market transparency, ET3 will greatly amplify what the net did.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
@EvacuatedTubes I wish not to prevail, merely to understand, I'm happy to use different terminology if you don't agree with Jacque's definition of RBE. So I ask my original question again using different terminology: Do you see ET3 as a monetary investment that will help to "prop-up" the global monetary economy, or something which can help to make monetary economics obsolete and therefore a route towards a civilized egalitarian society with no money/war/politics, just global human co-operation?
TZMReadingJay 1 year ago
@TZMReadingJay We do not seek to prop up what is built on a faulty foundation and not worth saving. What cannot be transformed into value should be allowed to fail; potentially valuable things should be supported until they thrive. Much of the economy is based on resources. A universal resource is energy, so it could be said that we are in an “EBE” (energy based economy), and energy backs money. We see transport as the most basic resource, with ET3 transportation will not depend on Energy.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
@TZMReadingJay 'Global human cooperation'; is rapidly improving with technology. The process of “civilization” caused war death rates to decline for all recorded history. “Politics” is negotiating differences in opinion about how resources get allocated. When asked “who would decide resource allocation?”, Fresco replies “a computer”. Who programs the computer? We see the Internet (and money) as such a “computer”. ET3 will greatly advance allocation computing efficiency and “civilization”.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
@TZMReadingJay
We have always had a RBE -- (money is more efficient distribution tech than barter). If Fresco believed in no IP, his DVDs would be a free download... people would provide labor, and materials... and his 40 year old project would now cover half of Florida. TVP's "social engineering" is just Marxism - "from each according to ability, for each according to need". Truth is "commune tech" has not done very well. Let's use the best techs (like ET3) to enjoy Fresco's vision.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
There's always a country welling to put this technology in too work, who ever achieves first well advance too the next stage of life. Chaos well fade and Zen
well clear the mind so it focuses on more technological advances for the well being of
human kind and for the healing of mother earth to begin. no more oil use, city smog pollution. More parks and places for people to interact, instead of streets ,cars,honking horns, smell of gasoline and traffic being in the way.
MotherEarthswarrior 1 year ago
@MotherEarthswarrior China and India.
AwakenFromTheSlumber 1 year ago
Cool idea. But appearently it also heals AIDS, is able to get rid of fundamentalism, secures feeding for billions and also denies corruption of any form.
What I'm saying:
It's a great concept, but don't blow it up with patriotism and exaggerated positivism.
sparefankerl 1 year ago
It needs not to be owned by any one and
All cuntrees should be givven equal money not just us whal outher countres stay behind
buildings1 1 year ago
thank you for sharing,... good info could actually be possible riight now,... but here in europe they invest in stupid old railways :( like ave ..of course expensive and subsidised by the EU taxpayer ....
FINISUNIVERSI 1 year ago 2
It could be a second revolution after the net. Internet in the last years contributed to combine several cultures, this new sistem can physically combine people...and the psychological effect of this would be magnificent...
MrNICCO89 1 year ago 20
is he eating or something? i can not understand a word....
derWalter 1 year ago
@derWalter Get your ears checked.
Sbetsho 1 year ago
They better get cracking at building this technology soon, I'm sick to death of airports, customs and flying for 18 hours in a cramped seat next to total strangers. One could go on touring the world at their leisure, without shitty airline food.
OxygenBurglar 1 year ago
Seriously, I'm all for this technology, but they should come up with a better name. It sounds like some 21st century laxative.
LuminousCosmos 1 year ago
do you know if any company/anonye is building this cus it wold be great!
roberto25721 1 year ago
this idea is so fucking crazy its genius, if only investors were crazy enough to fund it, alas I don't think they are.
frbe0101 1 year ago
Love ETT tech & the derivative maglev train option as well.
People who claim TZM or TVP is Socialism have no clue what they're talking about & are project their own bias on us.
Here are just 2 of the many differences: Socialism uses money & is about HUGE government controlling people. TVP is about no money & local systems governing themselves using technology (more than flawed people) to service basic human needs.
Drastically different concepts, so no, it's not Socialism.
TZMSocialEvolution 1 year ago
Can we send turtles through these?
fgf284 1 year ago
venus=lucifer lol and where in the video of zeitgeist do they condone socialism???
TooChill 1 year ago
is that Alienscientist...?
shadow1910 1 year ago 7
Yes, I made this video for my friend Daryl Oster who owns the patents and is perhaps, the world's foremost expert on ET3 (Evacuate Tube Transport Technologies.
AlienScientist 1 year ago
sounds like a good idea... I'll take five of 'em.
ron7006 1 year ago
how do u think you would stop. just add air or wat??
electronicchronic 1 year ago
@electronicchronic
magnetic strips on the sides go and when it goes by magnetic strips along the tube the magnetic pull slows it until it stops
Takua38000 1 year ago
Im opposed to the use of this technology to maintain a monetary system or the status quo. The idea that this technology can prop up the economys is fullish. All it will do is further unemployment by reducing the existing number of occupations. The only way a monetary system could exist with this technology is population reduction. Which is wicked in every way imaginable. A labor in exchange for goods and services system of living is no longer realistic. And to think so is delusional.
Limeisback2012 1 year ago
@Limeisback2012 If it is true that technology can't prop up the economy, we would all be living like cave men basic survival no economy at all. Technology IS the economy. This has bee true since cave men discovered the technologies of: fire making, flint napping, and camel riding.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
@EvacuatedTubes (@Limeisback2012) No, technology in and of itself can stimulate the economy. But one factor is detremental to the free market: Automation, which is an inevitable side effect of technology, and it is implemented in the hope to furthermore maximise profits. And it does - in the short term - BUT: Automation ultimately leads to less jobs, therefore less purchesing power for the people. This is the cycle of technologycal unemployment. See ZM Orientation Presentation for more info.
W1z3k 1 year ago
@W1z3k Or it means more people can do more productive things. I mean if you take what you say to be the truth than farmers shouldn't use tractor instead they should have more farmhands and animals to till the land or we shouldn't use trucks to haul things that we could carrier ourselves just there would be more jobs
Darkwizzrobe 1 year ago
@Darkwizzrobe If you think I said this, you shouls re-read what I wrote. Otherwise, you are completely right. Today this is true: We can either have regulated technological decline (people doing things by hand which machines could do easily, hence there are more jobs) or everincreasing technological unemployment. The latter happens is in a truly free market, the former in a somewhat regulated one. But in this system, these are the only choices we have really. Or we can implement another system..
W1z3k 1 year ago
agreed......the wohle system serves only to ensalve us anyway .... the people could dedicate themseves to their own creativity instead of following mindless jobs.
FINISUNIVERSI 1 year ago
This technology was conceived, by engineer inventor Henri Coanda in 1930. Name technology is AEROTUBEXPRES. For more details, search Wikipedia Henri Coanda.
marinohell 1 year ago
@marinohell AEROTUBEXPRES (ATE) was proposed as a Pneumatic Tube Transport (PTT) system where the vehicles are propelled by pressure difference (like at drive up banks). AET (a form of PTT) will not reduce friction like ETT. The first PTT system was BUILT in NYC by Beach (the editor of Scientific American) in the 1800s long before Coanda's proposal. Coanda was a brilliant aerodynamics, I am impressed with Coanda Effect airfoils, and NOTAR helicopters made possible by Coanda's work.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
A very useful technology indeed. I reckon it could also be used for a central distribution system; seamlessly transporting goods on demand. This is truly wonderful news. I totally support its implementation. I hope it survives opposition from the big automobile industry and big oil. This technology makes sense!
bad4ever2001 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
i absolutely love this idea! i must interject however, i noticed a "venus project" snapshot in there towards the end. zeitgeist does provide accurate information as far as how things are working financially, and it exposes the corruption (federal reserve, ect.) but the solution they offer is socialism. the religious portions of it have been debunked too. venus=lucifer. don't be deceived. i love your videos though. you do an excellent job. one of my favorite channels for sure. =)
nwothugslayerboi 2 years ago
I'm not even sure that this is worth responding to. But, Venus = Lucifer? How about NO. I'm sorry, but the concept of Venus was around for 1000's of years before Lucifer was ever thought of. Here you've built a logical fallacy called "False Dichotomy.". The two figures you suggested are not in any way related, regardless of how much you think so.
Xeletoph 1 year ago
Furthermore, what do you have against socialism? You're the one spitting around words like "Lucifer", so it should interest you to know that Jesus was the greatest socialist of all time. Now get off you right wing hook and join the rest of us in the 21st century. Good day.
Xeletoph 1 year ago
watch zietgeist and the debunking of zietgeist then you'll get it. no thats not what this video is about exactly but the same people behind the venus project are the same people who destroyed our economy. the idea is to destroy the old and create "the new world order." order out of chaos. here's utopia! just give up your sovereignty. remember hitler? lucifer aka the bearer of light is at times embodied as venus btw. do your homework or keep grazing with the rest of the sheeple. lol...
nwothugslayerboi 1 year ago
you don't have a goddamn clue woman. odds are, you don't know you're rights. you can't tell the difference between common law and admiralty law. you think the government is here to help you? hahaha... they stage wars for profit. they run drugs. join you in the 21st century? no thanks i prefer paying cash, growing my own food, and walking around free of of RFID chips. you enjoy your GMO food and fluorinated water lady. really... hahaha. you liberals are the new obama youth huh? HIEL OBAMA!!
nwothugslayerboi 1 year ago
Go ahead and keep shooting, man. Keep on assuming my position, and then insist I defend it. You'll find that you'll never hit the target, because you're shooting at a ghost. You're very good at building assumptions, unfortunately when you assume you make an ass out of you and me.
Zeitgeist religious section debunked, huh? By whom, I would ask - which is a question I know the answer to. Christian apologists! Of course they'd say that Jesus isn't Horus, it'd refute their entire belief system.
Xeletoph 1 year ago
And you can grow your own food if you want, as long as you don't mind the arsenic poisoning, and you can drink unfiltered water too, as long as you don't mind mercurial poisoning. The only way the earth can repair its self and sustain life is if we embrace technology to its fullest. Utilize hydroponic aeroponic technology in order to mass produce foods in skyscrapers. Take our farms in doors. Doing this will allow the earth to heal its self. Not that religious people care about saving the planet
Xeletoph 1 year ago
And, go ahead and maintain your false dichotomy. I'm sure you'll maintain your bogus belief that ancient pagan beliefs and Lucifer are connected when indeed the entire idea and concept of lucifer its self is an amalgamation of older belief systems. The idea of the after life, and punishment in the afterlife, are firmly Zoroastrian, Babylonian, Mesopotamian, and even Sumerian belief structures. You can keep believing in the testimony of goat herders, but prepare to be laughed out of the room.
Xeletoph 1 year ago
@nwothugslayerboi We visited the Venus Project in Florida, and found the founder Jacques Fresco to be very productive and lucid in his 90s he is a brilliant designer and futurist whom I have great respect for, and we can agree to disagree on politics. We at et3 are not associated with the Zeitgeist movement, yet we are pleased that they recognize the value of ETT, and are thankful to Jacques for introducing them to ETT, and for including ETT briefly in the Zeitgeist movie.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
@nwothugslayerboi This is in response to Zeitgeist as ETT is not portrayed correctly; ETT does NOT operate like trains, ETT operates like a freeway. While the ZA and the Venus Project are linked with political ideology, et3 and ETT are neutral. ETT fits in most political climates because transportation is a universal need. We are focused on private implementation of ETT with ownership incentives because that is what usually achieves the quickest global adoption of new technologies.
EvacuatedTubes 1 year ago
@EvacuatedTubes (@nwothugslayerboi) TVP is not a political movement. It may be misunderstood as such by many, but in fact it's simply not. Furthermore, I very much like that you were influenced by TVP, and as such, you should be aware 2 facts: (1) Technoloical advencement is useless unless it brings about positive social change, (2) The more cheap automation you have the less healthy the monetary system will get due to technological unemployement. In the end, this is also a move towards TVP.
W1z3k 1 year ago
@EvacuatedTubes How far have you got with private implementation? With all the clear benefits, why aren't we riding it already, do the current transport mogols want to give up such a big slice of the pie? or is this project already underway? In a resource based economy, this would have been realized yesterday, and you'd already be working on v2.0. Be Tesla's, not Morgans
Iamthenoi 1 year ago
@EvacuatedTubes The Venus Project and The Zeitgeist Movement are NOT political, they want to remove all government. Decisions will be arrived at by looking at all the facts and the best solution will be implemented, no one will use OPINIONS or MONEY to make decisions as done today. I love the concept of safe, fast, clean transportation. It's also logical to implement it. But because of money and personal interests, we don't have it right now.
Wenona1975 1 year ago
@nwothugslayerboi
You're using "socialism" very broadly. TVP is not like anything that has ever been tried. No money, no leaders, no ownership, no prison's, no servitude. Knee-jerk reactions to these ideas are expected, but it is thoroughly thought out and backed by science. Don't take my word for it. This is not something that can happen overnight, of course. It will take a change in values.
As for the "venus=lucifer" claim -- it's called The VENUS Project because it BEGAN in VENUS, Florida!
SophistAssassin 1 year ago
@nwothugslayerboi
TZM does not condone or promote socialism. Socialism still requires labour, money and government involvement. If you even bothered to read anything about The Zeitgeist Movement you would know that their proposed system, along with The Venus Project does not require any of those things.
Please educate yourself a little more before you spout off your ignorance.
sbtornado 1 year ago
This is brilliant!, I have a one question would the Human body be able to withstand 4000mph?.
ProsperityGlobal 2 years ago
When you are traveling in a car at 70mph down the highway can you feel anything? No...
Velocity is relative. Force = Mass x Acceleration
Acceleration is change in velocity. (speed up or slow down) you only feel a force when there is acceleration (F=ma) like when you press on the accelerator (gas) or the brakes.
Also when you go around a turn you experience centripetal force (F=mv^2/r) so you would have to make the tubes very straight... These are the only physical limitations though.
AlienScientist 2 years ago
Then International Evacuated Tube Transport on every continent must be built ASAP!.
ProsperityGlobal 2 years ago 3
It's easy - Remember how they're Evacuated Air Tubes? With all the air sucked out of the tubes, it's almost like a micro-gravity environment. There's no friction, no pressures involved in the traveling process. Therefore there's no chance for going squish when you come to a sudden stop from traveling at high velocities.
Xeletoph 1 year ago
Thank you for your reply, Im a leyman when it comes to physics.
ProsperityGlobal 1 year ago
You can still get bsquished against the inside of the Vehicle. Take a look at the new Haethrow Unmanned transport POds for a system that is in use, and real. That could be the future of Urban transport or Delivery
PacManJulie 1 year ago
Yeah bro, I had this idea too when I was 17. Then I realized that at the speeds involved the slightest change in direction would pancake the entire passenger cabin against the wall. Also, if you want to get mainstream recognition for your proposal you probably shouldn't post it as a reply to a fucking Zeitgeist conspiracy theory video on Youtube.
SAGEBOT500 2 years ago
shut yout mun,u fucking negativ humanbeing
u mean when you were 17 ,you discovered it all? oh,i wish u were here to kik u in face.
orchid79ful 1 year ago
shut yout mun,u fucking negativ humanbeing
u mean when you were 17 ,you discovered it all? oh,i wish u were here to kik u in face. have you heard about step bye step technology improvment.
u idiot never could imagine that we can have internet and mobile one day.to find out that idea in 17 needs fantasy ,no negativ person like u have fantasy,just shut up
orchid79ful 1 year ago
This is great. But we have teleportation technology HERE TODAY. its just not mainstream yet. But this is still cool non the less.
Munit12 2 years ago
Ett will exist in a short matter of time, it's not a question of resources or money, but of global human consciousness! Let it be called, The peace on earth tube
sinticlase 2 years ago 3
He is thinking that way to easily justify it in the eyes of those who would raise questions of cost.
ArgusPlexus 2 years ago 2
You have stop thinking in terms of money and the economy man
Great video
Whoisafraidofreality 2 years ago
oh mu gud ha ha ha...whoisa fuck u i laughed a lot,,man
orchid79ful 1 year ago
prone to terror & accidents
It would never make the news m8, as long as the oil barrens are still in control
djnero78 2 years ago
this Reminde me of James Bond The Living Day Light, and The World Is Not Enough whare they got pipe travel.
sideslide23 2 years ago
Why aren't you guys taking this to the News, the white house?!
This ideal could change the world as we know it,
EpisodeWatcher 2 years ago
some probably have...what makes you think the news will listen?
Catacipige 2 years ago
Well actually the "news" won't listen... Every time someone tries to even talk about ufology they all turn to skeptics and just start laughing.
Get huge groups of people, thousands. Migrate to the white house and demand the truth. I've never seen anything like this tried, and if everyone truly cares as much as they say I don't see why it's not done.
As for me, I am only 16 years of age. I can't do much, but that doesn't mean I'm not going to try.
EpisodeWatcher 2 years ago
your ETT patent expires in 2019, so bye bye profits !
Martinit0 2 years ago
LOL! Futurama, anyone?
CryoSporeFan043 2 years ago
You all should watch zeitgeist 2. What "terrorists" are, who invented the term, and if they really exist is mentioned somewhere in there. A lot of other great theories which are most likely true are also mentioned.
pseast 2 years ago
Comment removed
pseast 2 years ago
this reminds me of futurama lol, that means you could live in newyork and go to school in china haha
Ihaveamadkr3w 2 years ago
small problem with a monorail type traveling system that is connect on two or more different countries...what about the continual expansion of the planet Earth?
It is my understanding that the Planet Earth, along with almost every other planet, is growing in size thus causing the continents to shift further apart from each other...An intercontinental tube traveling system seems to be asking for disaster
Josue0486 2 years ago 2
Josue,
You are correct that earth movement, growth, or shrinkage is an important consideration for ETT. The patent document discloses several ways to mitigate this issue - such as expansion joints. Thank you for your pertinent comment.
EvacuatedTubes 2 years ago
Fascinating!
academianon 2 years ago
they need tax money for fuel oil. the issue is not co2.
cue7979 2 years ago