Added: 3 years ago
From: LukeJ60
Views: 2,337
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (341)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Everyone can agree on what a pen looks like and how it works. There's no controversy there. Among believers, there has never been any universal consensus on who/what 'God' is, as proven by endless debates and wars.

  • You believe in the pen, but then science prooves that it actually was a paint brush.

    But the pen promised you eternal life, even though it is actually someone elses wishfull thinking. So, contrary to all the evidence, you keep on believing in the pen because you so want to go to heaven, imaginary as it is.

    And er... no, we live in a 4D world! Not a 2D or 3D world.

  • @VonVladimierVoltar Science hasnt proved the pen is a paintbrush. you cant diss-proove God. And it was an analorgy (think thats spelt right) We can't see the spiritual relm around us.

  • @LukeJ60 Yes, Analogy.

    Pen = God (6000 yr old earth, Genesis story etc).

    Paintbrush = Scienctific explanation (Big bang, evolution etc)

    Science HAS proven the Paintbrush, in many ways. Just DNA is sufficient prove of evolution. Not to mention geology, paleontology, biology, physics, etc.,

    I can not dissprove 'god', simply because 'god' could have used the big bang and evolution to create.

    But it is NOT the 'god' of the bible or koran or whatever book we created here in earth.

  • @VonVladimierVoltar noooo Scientific is that its just smudges over time and bits dropping onto the paper over time.

    Science hasn't proven it, DNA is a launguage, and no known launguage exsists without a creator. DNA beeing the launguage of life. Geology is with young earth, saw a doctumentry on the natural history channel that there was a world wide flood about 4,000 years ago (comeing from athiests) and we've been saying this for years, Palaentology, and the rest can give many examples.

  • @LukeJ60 Sorry, I just noted your age.

    Listen kid, when I was your age I also believed and defended god. But then I grew up, experienced life, got an education and got a mature view of life.

    With respect, you know nothing of life or the god you worship. First grow up and get an education to start with before mouthing of again about things you do not even begin to understand.

    The we can discuss as adults. OK?

    At least it explains you terrible spelling... you are just a kid.

  • « DNA is a launguage »

    Ehr, no, DNA is a chemically active molecule.

  • « Geology is with young earth »

    Well yes: in every respect - except for where it concerns reality, of course. Geology sides with physics: 4.5 billion years since the Earth accreted.

  • @XGralgrathor This is just a kid!

    Do not be harsh on him.

    He is a good example of how unscrupilous religious people manipulate and mess up children. Everything he says is just repitition of some deceiver's lies.

    He has to walk his own path and discover how he has been lied to.

    We can guide and show the obvious lies, but he has to understand this himself.

    I did this only when I was in my late 20's.

  • @VonVladimierVoltar

    You're lucky, I guess. Many people never see reason to question the faith they were raised with.

  • « saw a doctumentry on the natural history channel that there was a world wide flood »

    How cute! Especially cute that they would call it a "documentary", as there is NOT EVEN A SINGLE scientific letter or paper making such a claim.

  • Hmm, a mystical sky daddy poofed us into existence or we slowly evolved? hmm which sounds more likely? magic.. or science? and that statistic was bullshit btw. its not by random chance, its natural selection. Those which are better suited to their environment survive better and are more likely to reproduce. Simple.

  • @UnseenAtheist hes not mystical, nor does he live in the sky. hes a loveing omnipresent beeing.

    Science is test repeat and observe, we cannot do that with the creation of the universe or evolution therefor its not science.

    it is random, evolution is composed of mutatians speicies, certain mutains benifit the creature and so it spreads.

    adaptation. birds getting bigger, stronger wings coz they fly more - truth

    evolution. lizards growing wings because they jump up and flap about.

  • @LukeJ60 The good mutations help the things survive. yes it is random when it happens but them surviving and breeding is not. And adaption is evolution. The birds you are talking about had a mutation and that made them better suited to survive and thrive in their environment.

  • « Science is test repeat and observe »

    Almost, kiddo. Science is testing claims through repeatable observations. The *observations* must be able to be repeated, not the events that caused them. Example: the Hubble redshift is one of the clues that first led to the formulation of the Big Bang model (by a priest called LeMaitre). The Big Bang itself occurred only once, but the observation on the redshift can be repeated as many times as you like, and will give identical results each time.

  • AWESOME ! God bless you Luke :)

  • yes there is a tiny chance of life , but in the infinitely expanding universe and possible multiverse's its a 1 in 100000000000000000 chance that life would not occur ..so your logic here is flawed. the origins of the universe and evolution are separate things. evolution has been proven with DNA alone, not to mention fossils and transitional forms etc. the origins of the universe is believed to be a simple state that expanded. if this is not true how does not knowing make god the default answer?

  • The is Scientific evidence in evolution, and Catholic Charles Darawin he discovered it. Hey i know the bible makes you dumb, but try researching before you try an argement. I'll try the bible way to make my point. Harry Potter beats Lord Voldemort in the book, it must be true even without evidence. lol

  • @supersaiyan3elite there is no Scientific evidence in evolution, evolution is a faith. it has no proof its all specualtion.

    the difference between a book stated to be fiction versus a book written thousands of years ago predicting the future, claiming to be a valid souce of information. hmm hard choice. Also if you dissmiss the bible then why don't you dissmiss the other thousands of history documents we get all of our moder day understadning of history from?

  • @creationdebunked if u don't believe in god thn u don't believe tht he/she/GOD didn't need a creator, so u therefor cundredicted yourselve, by using an example tht u say is wrong

  • @yigoto yes it duz stupid, if u believe we evloved from monkeys (highly iliogical, proven to b impossible BY SCIENCE) thn u also believe in the big bang theory, becuase all other theories r religistict meaning the earth waz made by A GOD, and the god this video is tlking about made humans first, not monkeys, o and btw THE PEN IS REAL!!!!!!

  • You are an idiot. The origin of the universe has noting to do with evolution thicko.

  • @yiggoto No but its just as stupid :P nothing exploded and created everything roflmfao

  • @LukeJ60 that is true and no one ever said that it did, i suggest you research it more, the big bang theory isnt actually a bang at all. but of course you already know this ? hmmm guess not

  • Analogy #FAIL . You never saw a god make a world, so you don't know what a world made by a god would look like. Therefore, you have no way of distinguishing between a god made world and one that was made by natural processes. Only science provides us with a reasonable explanation that accounts for the evidence we see.

  • @freethinker923 Your like Jake from Adventure time when he lost his imagination, he said, and I quote "I cannot tell you something amazing, for there is nothing amazing happening around us that I can describe for you." To which Finn replied, "Dude, you totally suck now." I believe the same of you.

  • The human brain is programmed to believe that everything has a beginning and an end. This simply is not true. Many cosmologists believe that there have been countless big bangs and big crunches. All matter in the universe has always existed, it just changes forms through geologic time. We do not have to posit magic and tell our selves "goddunit". Time to grow up people.

  • @SkullVodka "All matter in the universe has always existed" Is false, With matter you need to measure it in time, you CANNOT have matter without time, if there is no time then the matter cannot exsist, becuase it needs to be counted for. Its like having a ruler that has no legnth... And time cannot have always exsitsed! if time was eternal. then we would never have reached this moment in time, 'coz it never had a start

  • If god doesn't need a creator, why does the universe need one. Matter cannot be created or destroyed, it can only change states. What if the universe has always existed ? Matter and energy are interchangeable there is no evidence to suggest that there was ever absolutely nothing. Only creationists think once there was nothing, a perfect god came out of nothing and created everything out of nothing.

  • @CreationDebunked With matter comes time and space. Which DID have a start, as for amtter, iv'e never heard from anywhere that matter can't be created or destroyed. Its Energy that Can't be destroyed or created. Time/space had a start, they CANNOT have always exsisted. therfore they had a start. God lives outside of our dimension, his power in our dimension would be energy/matter, God always exsisted. He is supernatural, the universe/life isnt. its complex, there is no way a cell created itself

  • @

    You're an  idiot.

  • Even if it were true that the chances of life spontaneously forming from naturally occurring protiens were 1 in 1,000,000,000, (the truth is, no one knows what the ratio would be. There's no way to test how probable the natural formation of life is) it would be irrevelant because of the fact that there are billions of stars in our galaxy alone. So based on your math, life would have formed without the benefit of a creator atleast once in this galaxy.

  • I find it really archaic to believe in a god/gods that have humanlike personalities. I find mankind to be really primitive and stupid at times, so why do people call their god perfect when he/she/it itself often (in their holy books) show the same feelings/do the same acts? Hate, love, disgust, the need to kill people he/she/it hates, giving orders that would be considered as inhuman and sick if a person gave those orders. This whole "perfec god" shit is just strange to me.

  • Firts I just wanna ask where you got this 1 out of 1,000,000,000 etc chanse of life ever emerging. Secondly dont try to describe big bang as "something out of nothing" its a really childish oversimplification. Its so easy for people who havent read anything about the different theories to just spew out half truths. Besides, if god dosent need a cause then why would the universe need it? Also why does this god have to be the christian god?

  • but right as i said im christian and stuff i just dont believe in stuff,, but i have something to say about it,, who create the pen (god),, who is the god in the first place ? what he used to create this ? how did he made the human ? and all that sort of stuff ? i suppose everyone believes what they want and thats theirs choise and you cant go against it because you never seen the truth with your on eyes ? but i got to say you good at making videos,, keep on doing these stuff :) i like watchin

  • You either belive Nothing created everything, or something always exsitsed

    The universe HAD a start. Do you belive in cause and affect? God is that cause. God is an omnipresent beeing... He is outside of our universal laws. matter time and space, those 3 things HAD to have had a start, thy cannot be eternal. Whatever created Matter time and space, Doesnt not subject to the laws of M,T&S, and therfore can create matter time and space.

  • mate,, i meant to be a christian lol although i dont believe in stuff like that but you know music and this video you made is damn goos seriously i love it why wont you try to apply to be as youtube partner and try get some money of that ? :) i like the fact that you like feeder :) high fives mate

  • I didnt know you could be a youtube partner making music videos? i thought it was for like comdy and vloggers..

  • I would just like to ask this one question. Can you define evolution in a biological context?

  • The process by which the genetic structure of populations changes over time...

  • You know (pretty much) the biological definition of evolution. This means you must know that by definition it has been observed and tested in labs and in nature.

    I wonder now, why did you make this straw man if you knew what evolution was.

  • ahem, no creature has ever been veiwd to gain information in the gene pool...

    No fish has ever become a mammel, it cannot be tested repeated, observed, it is a theory.. not a fact

    also missing about 70 billion fossils... i meen come on?! if an ape like creatue became a man. you would find thousands of fossils of the tranformation.. also, If everything evolves.. how would you explain grass?? Its still here yes.. but? after billions of years, grass could be soo much more... fruit? strawberries?

  • Yes it has, nylon eating bacterium and wall lizards evolving a cecal valve (and I can cite you source for both of those if you like).

    You just defined evolution, and by that definition, it has been observed. So again, I have to ask, why are you creating straw men of evolution if you know what evolution really is?

  • 70 billion fossils? Why are you missing that many? Because you say so?  Nevertheless, we do find transitional fossils in many different lineages such as hominins, horses, whales, and birds (the list could go on).

    The way I would explain grass is that it has found a niche to exploit. There is no reason for it to produce fruit; it is robust in the environment it is found in.

  • I'll also re-explain it.. BS!!!

  • What are you talking about? Where did you re-explain it? What is BS?

  • you: can you define evolution in a biological context?

    Me: yes its BS

  • Yet you did define evolution in a biological context and got it mostly right. In addition, by the definition it has been observed and tested. Just because you think, it is BS does not make those facts away.

    It seems like you are trying to have your cake and eat it too.

  • First off, you spelt atheism wrong.

    Second, the whole video is just two logical fallacies, one within another. The first one is a false dichotomy. You state that there are two opinions and being the pen (god) and the other evolution (which was the second fallacy because it was a straw man of evolution). It could be possible that both of those answers are wrong and there is a third that no one has thought up yet that is true.

  • you are cheating, you showed the existing pen and compired it with non exixting angry God.

  • Yes, our chances are slim be in such a perfect position from our sun & have our other bells & whistles, but when you consider the amount taking part in the lottery, someones going to win. Say an est 1 billion stars per galaxy to the est 100 billion galaxies. if the chances are 1/100 billion harbor life & suitable atmosphere on a planet. That's still 1 billion earths. & your hypothisis brings up a bigger question then it answers, but you hide him in your 'inconceivable' shroud.

  • AHHHHh I love those straw man.. So easy to detect that even a 12 years old kid could find that your example does not make any sence. Seems you IQ is lower than the one of a 12 years old though...

  • You strawman our position because you can't refute our actual position.

  • This is a dumb video. Its dumb because the analogy starting out with the pen is not correct. A pen DOES exist and everyone has seen one. Try using something to represent god that no one has never actually ever seen.. like a unicorn, leprechaun, bigfoot.. etc. Your logic skewed from the beginning.

  • @napavines wat its meant to represent is tht we are outside of God dimension, we are simple 2-D comapred to God in a 3-D world, we are flat on a pice of paper and cannt see outisde, meanwhile God is outside and can enter at any time he wants anywhere he wants and so watever he wants..

  • Not every athiest believes in the big bang if there is god, why would he let hundreds of thousands of innocent people die in the catastophic destruction of all human life except for seven people

  • well. we let sin in the world so its our own fault.. :O

    and wat catastophic destruction of all human life are you tlaking about??

    if u meen the flood id be happy to explain..

  • Facepalm

  • who made god?

    lololol

  • hes eternal!

    who made the big bang?

  • no, i just owned ur entire argument about athiesm, check ur own comments.

    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.

    Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?

    Then why call him God?

  • God is able to prevent evil, and willing. but he allows it so we can learn.. simple.. and so big bang?? where did it come from?

  • i never said i was for evolution or creation i dont have the answers i was just giving you some thought provoking questions.

    remember that youre a slave to chemical reactions in your brain.

    if god is all knowing then why did he give us such a shit hole to live in. Surely he knew what it would become? I never even asked for life he just gave it me out of the blue, what a strange guy.

  • God gave us the perfect world. where we cud live life loud! ^.^ but he HAD to give us a choice. we had to choose. and we choose to rebel agaisnt God.

    then this world became a shit hole, nothing bad on this world is off God, its all mans doing..

    so how do you think we got here?

  • very nice =)

  • John 17:3 Now this is eternal life. That they may know you, the only true God and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.

  • in order for the pen to exist there must be a factory that makes pens, your argument in this video proves nothing , just makes creationists look even dumber.

  • we live on a piece of paper, compared to God who lives out side it all. we cant see like him, but he can see like us, coz he made us. from nothing!

  • @grimysoldja- thats not the point, he was just using it as an example

  • Wow I will use this video to explain myself. SO MUCH SMARTER THAN ME! XD

  • very good way to put it! its nice to know that there are some people that love god the way i do! and all you nonbelievers yes hes real no we havent seen him but look at all the stuff he left us! the bible, churches, even movie about him he is real as it gets.

  • Very nice and inspirational video!

  • Another indication is the prophecy of the life and death of the Messiah. It is proved to be written hundreds of years before Jesus Christ lived, and all of the prophecies were perfectly fulfilled. The whole New Testament is full of eye-witnesses of that. To me it is very clear... But I respect ppl who have different thoughts...

  • First of all, great video!

    I also believe God created us. But I also think there is some kind of evolution. Creatures can change over time when placed in a different environment. But they will never become an animal of a different kind! This is what is proven. Besides that, humans can also change. People used to be a lot smaller then we are now, because we are better fed and we live in better circumstances. But like I said, a monkey will never become a human.

  • Where is any evidence whatsoever of your god's presence. There isn't any. If you were born in Iraq you'd be telling us that Muhamed was gawd.

  • The "god made us" theory does not follow physics. Where did you get the number for the chance of evolution? And the odds of it happening are irrelevant in an infinite universe, for every 1 time there is evolution, there is

    1, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00­0,000 times it isnt there.

  • You may ask "How can you trust the bible?"

    I trust it because the bible is God inspired and was written by more than 40 (I don't remember an exact number) men, who most had never even met each other, and it was written over a period of about 3000 years!!! And on top of that there is not one contradiction!!! How could that even be possible without a higher being telling them what to say?!?!?! To me that is pretty convincing!!!

  • How can you trust the bible?

    It is god inspired.

    How do you know it's god inspired?

    Says so in the bible.

    statement x is true because y is true.

    statement y is true because x is true.

    Circular=/=logic

  • I'm glad you see my point! :)

  • Since I believe in intelligent design I believe God created us like I said before. There might have been evolution for other creatures but humans haven't evolved over millions of years. In Genesis 2:7 it says "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul."

  • At first, well done, great vid!

    Then, I also believe God created us and every living thing. But creatures and human can actually envolve, but they stay the same kind. What I wanna say is: an animal can adjust to it's environment, but will never become an animal of a different kind. That's exactely what's been proven...

  • Comment removed

  • Besides that, human can also change. People used to be a lot smaller then we are now, because we are better fed and we live in better circumstances. But like I said, a monkey will never become a human.

    You can never prove a believe, but there are some indications. Look at the nature and it's perfect balance. If something would be slightly different the earth wouldn't exist after such a long time. I don't believe that's all just coincidence. I believe Someone made it with greatest accuracy.

  • yes i completely agree!!! God had to have had a say in this! lol He does in everything else!!! :) but actually u're talking about adapting and not evolving...but yes i agree with u wholeheartedly!!!

    GOD BLESS U!!!

    MARANATHA!!!!

  • actually people used to liuve to 900 years old and grow too like 10 foot.... now we r getting smaller.. and shorter life spans..

    a dog can change into a bigger dog, a beak can grow a bigger beak.. thats micro evolution or adaptation, which is proven!

    macro.. is not proven,, and never can be!

  • Yeah that's what I mean, adaption might be a better word for it ;).

    You're right about the very tall people, and people in the Dark Ages used to be a lot smaller :)

  • I love your video and it's awesome but I didn't agree with some of the comments that you said. I am a creationist of course but I'm not going say I know that there is no such thing as evolution, because honestly I'm not sure...since God is so incomprehendable and so vast we have no idea how long God's days are, but no matter how long it took I think God made the world in 6 of His days and rested on the 7th.

  • great video!!! thnx!!!

    God bless!!!

  • So you say that there is a 1/1,000,000,000,000,000 chance that something like life will start to exist, fair enough. But what confuses me is that you find it more logical that a magic power that no one thought of until about 2000 years ago, would have created everything. And that power wasn't written down until a couple of hundred years after this magical death of Jesus = the person who wrote it took a wild guess about what had happened!

  • evolution is a fairytale.

  • 3 things Evolution - big bang atruggles wiv

    1. before the big bang was?

    2. The human population, if u say like: the human population doubbles every so many years, then if u take us bak, it takes around 5,000-6,000 years ago, not 3 million trillion years or however old they say we are.

    3. sexual organs? how do they explain that?

  • most of these arguments on here will not be solved. this was evidenced when i had a debate in my r.s. class. i basically counter argued every evidence for the big bang and theory of evolution that the opposing side put forward and then some. but, at the end, when asked which theory the class supported more, they put their hands up for evolution.

  • this is because it is the only theory with so-called 'evidence' that is taught to them by our wonderful education system, which only values the scientific, which is as narrow-minded as any so-called 'religious fanatic'. as it is the only thing taught to people as a 'factual' way of explaning creation, they will stubbornly defend it.

  • this stubborn defense, which leads to some of the ridiculous arguments i have seen on here, is because you don't understand both sides of these ideas, both their strengths and flaws. the main reason i know i won the argument is because, after looking at both sides of the argument, i have made my decision, know what the truth is, and know how to use it to prove these ideas over others. but most people on here cannot accept it.

  • urs isnt proof of evolution!

    if the big bang is true then surly the universe has always been expanding

  • HAHAHAHAHA - evolution, LOL

    either you're being sarcastic, or you're brain damaged.

  • the universe is a lot more complicated than this.

    and clearly you don't know what Atheism or evolution really is, so if i were u I wouldn't put these things in the public eye.

  • i believe in EVOLUTION. Why do i, well because there is EVIDENCE to support it. Where is your evidence to support creation?(and no quotes from the bible, thats not proof) but good vid. I cant understand how you dont believe in evolution when you demonstrated it so well. you clearly know alot about it yet you choose to ignore it. You have been brainwashed into believing in this so called sky daddy. I feel sorry for you :'(

  • retard. what is the chance that some guy (it HAS to be a guy according to many christians) creates the whole fking world in 7 days? and how about the arch of noach with every single animalspecie on it that exists? and that jesus while being dead 'rose' from his grave? And once again you´re wrong: you say atheists say that there was nothing that exploded and created everything? there was something, called tiny parts.they exploded and there was the beginning of earth, and that beginnining evolved

  • this is so childish. if you cannot understand science because of a sub-standard education then that is your problem....stop trying to inflict your faithful ignorance on everyone else. the bible doesn't teach physics or biology, it teaches mythology.

  • The only ones that believe something very complicated popped out of nothing is the religious (god).

  • I'm a Christian and hate to tell you this, but this is an incredibly weak argument. There's a fallacy of a weak analogy when comparing a pen and God. It is within our spectrum of knowledge to know how the pen writes, but how the universe was created is beyond our comprehension. Either way; if the world was created in six days, or if God put a process into motion millions of years ago it shouldn't really matter to believers in God. What matters is that God is the creator regardless of how...

  • not regardless, because all the things that come with God have to be logical, and scientifically correct in order for a god to make sense. you won't believe me if i tell you theres a purple hippo with a hat and rabbits on his back moonwalking in the sky, do u?

  • Did we evolve or did a pen draw us?

    *Joke Topic*

  • No Arsehole did we Evolve or God create us? did the paint randomly form on the paper to make us or did a pen draw us?

  • if the universe randomly apeard than we are all living a random pointless life. if some one creater us life suddenly hase a point! (good arguement) what do you bieleve in?

  • Well if some being just created everything I guess that's easy for you to understand.

  • What a wanker.

    btw: it's ATHEIST - not ATHIEST you moron!

  • nothing constructive to say? no arguments to make? not defending your pointe? no u call me wanker, ure not helping any1

  • your arguments are too weak and full of unlogical crap, not necessary to argument on that.

  • if i told you any evidence for God you wouldn't believe me and say "that's just your imagination". i'm not prepared to be bashed because of my arguments.

  • This isn't a good example...at all. The only people you are going to get to agree with you on it are people who already agree. I'm not an atheist but I don't see a point in this video. You're making atheism more attractive to me however. Good job on doing the devil's work for him.

  • tell me how a random explosion can occure create everything we have today and rearrange itself to form complicated life forms

  • exactly! all the atheists out there still seem to be avoiding that main argument!

  • you can not say that because A didn't create B, then therefore, B must be created from C. That is faulty logic. You can only state that A didn't create B, therefore, something other than A created B. A being the big bang, B being the universe and C being God.

    And btw, it is you guys that has improper arguments. All your arguments seems to not understand fully the theory of evolution and/or the big bang theory.

  • in that weird way of putting things you basically just that the Big Bang created the universe without any back-up evidence. Wow! great argument! definitely converted me! keep up the gr8 work *coughs sarcastically*

  • well, if you don't do the intellectual thinking and understanding of the Big Bang theory, then there's no point in arguing with you. It's like arguing to a brick wall. Please educate yourself before you state another argument. There is plenty more proof for the Big Bang than for God's existence. The only proof you can go by is the Bible and it lacks serious historical evidence and has many contradictions. It's a good back drop for faith but not in the world of logic and science.

  • okay, let's have a quiz.

    Question 1)

    What two past events lack historical evidence?

    a - The Big Bang and Evolution

    b - The Big Bang and Evolution

    c - The Big Bang and Evolution

    According to you there is evidence for The Big Bang. Like what?

  • "galaxies appear to be moving away from us at speeds proportional to their distance. This is called "Hubble's Law," named after Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) who discovered this phenomenon in 1929. This observation supports the expansion of the universe and suggests that the universe was once compacted."

  • where did the compact universe come from? and who packed it?

  • God can just have always been there, but it's not possible that the universe was just always there. That's crazy talk.

    *I hope you note the heavy use of sarcasm.

  • the compact universe has always been here, and will always be here. "who packed it" why do you as who? its obvious how it compacted, its called GRAVITY. the universe right now, at this very moment is EXPANDING. Due to the big bang. But it will not expand forever, it will slow down and once again begin to contract. Once again creating the big bang.

    But what id like to know from you is. How big do you think the universe is? like do you see a limit to its size? or do you think it does on forever?

  • just coz the universe is expanding now doesnt meen it always has. i bielive that God made the universe just big enough so we cant see out... God knew about our microscopes that we wud make to see the stars so he built the universe according to how much we can see. when the universe ends, there is nothing, out side that nothing is Gods dimension

  • "he made the universe just big enough so we cant see out" thats impossible. our technology is constantly adnvacing. we can see further and further all the time. What about when we create spceships capable of traveling vast distances, and see even further. there is no end to the universe. and if god knew that we would create telescopes to see further and further that means he knows the furture which also means he knew that some humans would go against him. so he created us to go to hell.

  • wat if we never get that far, to see things beyond, and to travel that deep into space, god knows wen the worlds gonna end, so he built the universe large enough so we cudent see out.

    god wanted to love and be loved. so he made us, most of us love him, but some of us, hate him, refuse, reject and ignore him, God gave us freedom! to love him or to hate him, you dont create sumthing and force it to love u!

  • if u have a child u care for him, you love him, and if he does somthing wrong you punish him.

    god made us, and for those who dont love him, to hell.

    its hard sending sum1 to hell, dnt think god hates you! coz he loves u and im sure sending sum1 to hell is a really tough choice, but Gods so kind, that once you have learnt your lesson in Hell. u can come and join him in heaven. yes hell is not "eternity" that word is nvr used in the original bible.

  • So everyone that lived before the death of Jesus was forced to live in hell, just because they hadn't thought of the (pretty insane) god theory?

  • answer my 3 questions, PROPERLY!

  • "if the universe was initially very, very hot as the Big Bang suggests, we should be able to find some remnant of this heat. In 1965, Radioastronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson discovered a 2.725 degree Kelvin (-454.765 degree Fahrenheit, -270.425 degree Celsius) Cosmic Microwave Background radiation (CMB) which pervades the observable universe. This is thought to be the remnant which scientists were looking for."

  • "the abundance of the "light elements" Hydrogen and Helium found in the observable universe are thought to support the Big Bang model of origins."

    Now tell me, what solid physical evidence of God do we have?

  • okay ... but first let me point out a few things. the universe may have once been compacted, but loads of things could have made it expand. the big bang is ONE of those possibilities among many others.

  • Once again with this second argument, many things could have been very hot in the past. The Big Bang is ONE of those possibilities among many others.

  • okay ... with the third argument. you just said "hydrogen and helium were created by the big bang" without any back-up.

  • there is a large flaw with the creation of gases after the big bang. if only helium and hydrogen were made, which is what scientists say, then how did all the others come into being?

  • you're joking, right?

  • no, i'm not. why would i? they say only two gases were produced, and not how every other one appeared. unless someone can explain to me how every single other one came into existence, then evolution has at least one considerable flaw in it. if you can't provide evidence for how they came about, then you are just as deluded as you seem to think us 'unenlightened' religious folk are. and i'll probably post more problems in a theory which is taught as fact without sufficient evidence to back it up.

  • okey, let's have another quiz.

    Question 2)

    What two past events lack historical evidence?

    a - God and Jesus

    b - God and Jesus

    c - God and Jesus

    According to you there is evidence for Jesus and God. Like what?

  • its a religion..... DUH! u belive! but i do think, there is evidence, but arsholes keeps covering up the evidence to try n prove us wrong... id type out pages and pages, but im on my wii internet, so i cant :P talk in about 2 weeks wen i get my computer.

  • you just summed everything i've ever wanted to say into one video. thankyou and God bless you too!

  • I believe pens exist because I have seen and used pens.

    By the way, you misspelled "Atheist."

  • I believe in the existence of ignorant, poorly presented arguments that neither understand the rules of logic or the actual topic being presented.

    This video is a perfect example of the above.

  • Saying "We were created" is just your short way of saying "I understand nothing about Genetics, Geology, or Biology, but I believe in magic!"

  • and saying "we evolved" is your way of saying "we are complete accidents and used to be monkies". next time watch the video isismoon.

  • No, saying "we evolved" is a way of saying "WTF do you think the reason is that you shouldn't take antibiotics when you don't need them? BECAUSE VIRUSES EVOLVE." It is also a way of saying "FOSSIL!!"

    Next time, read a book that is less than 2,000 years old... If you can't look at the evidence for yourself, there is no point in even attempting to answer you, because it will fly over your head and you'll reply with something as stupid as what you just said.

  • viruses dont evolve! its STIL a virus DUH! can viruses turn into frogs? NO!

    so you dont bielive what the egyptions wrote was true?

    or the greks?

    or the romans?

  • You just proved my point. Go learn something.

  • you still seem to be avoiding all our arguments. and last time i was sick i don't think the virus turned into a chicken. just like LukeJ60 said, viruses DO NOT EVOLVE!!!

  • Yes, they do. It's actually been proven in a lab. :/ A virus was introduced to an antidote, killing off a major portion. However, over time... the virus evolved to be completely immune to the antidote.

  • Go learn something, I'm not going to waste my time on your ignorance.

  • point proven. all you are able to is throw abuse at us, without any proper arguments.

  • Viruses are carriers of DNA. They are not able to reproduce in a way in which they can select for or against a set of DNA thus you are correct, viruses do no evolve. However, viruses are not considered "alive" either so they can't be classified in the evolution theory because viruses don't reproduce and thus can not be selected for or against.

  • Okay so you got the creation story 4 a cartoon and yourself as a weak puncline.

    Good Work!!

  • WHAT???

  • The arguement "the painting requires a painter" is a very weak one. That same arguement can be made using any religion and any god ever made up by man but you call call the pen "God/Yahweh".

  • I never knew as an atheist I never believed pens exist. Thank you for clearing that up for me. .......idiot

  • well, if god "drew" the earth, then it would not have water on it, as when the earth was originally formed, it had no water on it. It took 250 million years of asteroid bombardment to bring water on to the earth....

  • praise the sweet baby jesus

  • 6 pound 7 ounce

  • I think you may want to learn a bit more about science and the laws of physics before you start saying it's total bs. I mean, if you actually studied and understood science and THEN tried to disprove it it would be a better argument. But you don't, and you didn't, so stop trying to disprove everything the modern world, including computers, is based on

  • There is more than sufficient evidence for evolution just within the DNA in every cell in our bodies. I totally believe that God made everything, being active in the whole of the process which still continues today. Personally I have no problem with evolution being the way God makes living things.

  • God's not a pen.

  • Darwin has already proved that evolution occurred.....creationism scientists have been trying to prove for years and years that creationism is fact, and they cant prove it. Because it didn't happen. So, yes, 0/1 is a certainty, a certainty that we were not "created" by god. Evolution did occur, you can still believe in god and evolution, the bible is nothing but contradictory anyways. Well, contradictions and made up fairy tales.

  • To me, it follows that there would therefore be no physical constants. And therefore no laws of physics, matter or existance.

    Therefore by completely underestimating the role that God supposibly plays in nature, the world would not seem to work well and sustain life without the pen.

    Because it wouldn't exist!

  • Johuth- "well you fail to see that the world seems to work well and sustain life with out the pen."

    You weren't even considering that the pen exists to start with, and you were completely underestimating the role that the pen supposibly plays in nature. Consider that God does exist, and that he is responsible for setting the physical constants(hence the definition of God)which fundamentally make our universe how it is.

    Then remove the pen....

  • Prove it ewolferman! Waiste a lot of time trying to make people very unhappy. This argument has been going on for a long time, and i'm seriously not convinced!