@chloexchloexchloe yeah the last book has WAY too many things happening to leave anything out. I read it more than once because I felt I missed stuff the first time and plus I really liked it..
@tillylovestheworld I really agree about all the leaving out keeping the movies from making sense. Some of the directors don't seem to care I wonder if they will remedy anything in the last. Dumbledor wasn't just strolling down memory lane showing the memories. Harry learned vital things to the end fight and knowing his mind. They completely cut out what was important about the first memory. The facts he hated dependancy on others or being considered adverage.
@Miracle490d WHY CAN'T THEY JUST GO BACK TO HOW THEY DID IT IN TWO AND THREE? I CAN'T BELIEVE IT'S THE SAME SCREEN WRITER OR EVEN THE SAME AUTHOR LATELY. THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO GET BETTER AT MAKING MOVIES NOT WORSE !!!
@tillylovestheworld .....And they didn't even show any other memories. They didn't fix things like them calling Petigrew worm tail in 4 when Lupin never told the story of the map and all 3 animagus. And in 5 Cho was supposed to have been forced to tattle from the potion, so Harry should be considered a Jerk for not going back to her, but that wasn't what happened. Unless you read the books you wouldn't understand these things.
@Miracle490d i totally agree with everything you just said it just frustrates me so much that people who dont read or just cant be bothered reading harry potter books wont understand anything thats going on. i think if i had not read the hp books i wouldn't have a clue what was going on.
harry potter and the philosophers stone would probably have to be the most accurate movie. :P
@tillylovestheworld What frustrates me the worst is that all these movies are doing is cutting off the possibility that they'll ever be done right. I think I'd rather have waited years to see five the best book done right then what we got. Even if they had to do it with another cast. They missed one of the best points of doing them back to back. I was really looking forward to seeing the Riddle from part2 again. He was perfect !!! .......
@tillylovestheworld ..........He was perfect !!! Now he would be a little older, but the memory Riddle was older too. he would've been perfect to play Riddle's father too. THAT RIDDLE THEY GOT WAS AWFUL !!!! He was smug and evil looking in Slughorns memory, even as a kid. Nothing Charming about him at all !!!! They are missing he whole point to voldemorts manipulation !!!! No one would be fooled by that. Voldemort would've been stopped at the start. They just want him shown always evil. STUPID
@Miracle490d yea the first riddle was pretty much what i had imagined from reading the book. the thing that does annoy me quiet alot is the fact that dobby and other houselves are supposed to be in pretty much every book and dobby is supposed to help harry quiet alot and there isnt anything in the movies about Hermiones obsession with SPEW so how are they going to make the kissing scene make any sense?
@tillylovestheworld I said the exact same thing about doby and kreatcher to someone else on youtube. I've especially missed doby. He really should've been there on 5 and 6. Spew was important to him helping Harry find the room of requirement. The Neville bit sucked!!!!!!!!!!! But the biggest point I made about doby is since he’s been so cut out it will mean much less at his end. Harry had a bond with his do anything for you persona. 2 alone didn’t show that. JK should’ve objected heavily.
@tillylovestheworld But the worst part of all is how they’ve killed Harry’s passion. I loved it when Harry yelled at Ron and Hermione in 5. Then the twins say ducile tones in the movie its stupid!! They never let him rail on them. When they suggested DA he got frustrated “Stop that laughing!!!” It’s like the dummies think if harry gets angry the audience won’t like him.....
@tillylovestheworld ....I know they’re going to ruin the scene when he hates on dumbledor over grindelwald in the next one. He has every right to be angry. It makes him real. Daniel is a great actor, he showed it in 2 and 3. But the writers or directors keep pulling him backwards. In part 5 when he says to everyone joining the DA at the 1st meeting “….you can’t know what that’s like,” instead of what JK wrote he sounds like a wuss...
@tillylovestheworld ...What happened to, ‘when it’s just you and your guts or nerve to stop you or someone you care about from being killed,’and “it sounds great when you say it all together like that, but I had lots of help and if this hadn’t happened…” That line actually comes back in the end when Ron gets heroic. Why doesn’t JK object on important stuff instead of to dumbledor having a date with a woman? And why do these idiots waste making scenes like a date instead of making the books?
@iamhanabiyuu AMEN!!! wish They'd stop thinking JK's stuff isn't exciting enough or visual, so they mess it up for loyal readers. Has anyone else realized how the new quidich outfit is another inconsistancy? Even her reasons she states. If it's cuz they're older how come Wood never had one? If it's for protection against more risk, why didn't Fred and george have it? The beaters go after the hard hitting Bludgers!!!
@iamhanabiyuu@iamhanabiyuu .....The quaffle looked pretty light for the keeper and the snitch sure wouldn't hurt! Just another way to make the stars more maucho. Crap!!!
@iamhanabiyuu .....why don't they put more money in what was really in the book instead of that junk and making excuses on what can fit. If a movie is great you don't mind sitting 3hrs. Appollo13 never got complaints.
i prefered the origion dumberlore in the 1st and 2nd movie to the new one by far, dumbeldor is ment to be kind and loving which was the way the origional played him but the one doesnt seem to care in a way :(
She also said though, while she was writing the books... She always thought of Dumbledore as gay. Maybe, she just wanted to tell everyone her perspective.
He's not gay, you cant go though all the books with not a hint of homosexuality in his character and then suddenly anounce that he is gay.
If its not in the book, then hes not gay.
Its like sayin "Acually, its not written in the book, but on harrys broom, he has a slot where he put his dick in and that made it go faster", i dont think any of u would beleve that if she said it now.
Jk rowling only said that for media attention and money from newspapers now that her main income is now over.
@DeToXdAnGlz ROTFLMAO I love that broom bit. Daniel might do it too, since he's into nudity..LOL. But you're right. Dumbledor couldn't be gay. He could be abstinent, since he never seemed to marry. But if he were gay it would've been in wizard papers and Rita definately would've put it out there. He was too famous to have that big secret. It may be likely that JK was thinking of a gay person when she made the character's demeanor. Maybe even someone specific; inspiration comes from all over.
@DeToXdAnGlz It may be likely that JK was thinking of a gay person when she made the character's demeanor. Maybe even someone specific; inspiration comes from all over.
........But that doesn't make the character gay. It's just inspired by gay.
dean thomas gets married to luna so hes not gay or it might have been nevel i can't remember at the moment and draco also gets married so hes not gay the only person whos into penis is dumbledore so there
and that doesnt take away from dombledore's character at all hes still awesome
dean doesn't marry luna you moron- Luna marries Rolf -the grandson of Newt Scamander( the author of fantastic beasts and where to find them) Nevel marries Hannah Abbott -yea someone doesn't have a clue
Look I love Rowling a lot, but since she failed to make Dumbledore's sexuality known in the books it is still up in the air. That is like if Tolken a few years after the LOTR series was published told everyone that after the elven ships take Frodo and company away, Lord Sauron comes back and takes over Middle-earth. Once an author steps away from her characters they no longer are their's to change.Gay or straight Dumbledore is still a brilliant character.
seriously, she doesn't need to write in the book that dumbldore is gay! she wrote the book and this is how she designed the character. and the only reason it came out that he was gay was that in one of the movies they wanted to have an old girlfriend of his come in and since she is able to say yes or to the movie she said they couldn't have that scene in because he is gay.
And why would she say it just for money? shes richer then the QUEEN, She doesn't need more money whens shes that rich!!!!
lol im sure she is richer then the queen, there broke atm apparently :)
No but yeh ur right she dosent need nomey, but, honestly did you think he was gay when you read the books?
I dont think anybody did, so the character cant be gay if it isent even hinted on though out all the books, dosent matter if she ment ppl to think he was gay, cuz if she didnt say he was, he isent!
just because he doesn't act gay doesn't mean it's impossible for him to be gay. i know ppl that are gay but done't act gay. and about the money, she gets part of every harry potter merchindise that are sold world wide, and so far has like 1.1 billion dollars to her name.
...yeh i know, thats why i said "yeh your right she dosent need the money"
And so what if u know ppl who are gay but dont act it, if the book dosent describe a character as gay , and dosent have them do gay things, then its not in the text, so the characters not.
But if you consider that - what about the people who don't act heterosexual? You just assume they are because they are a majority. It sounds like you're putting too much stock in how gay people "should" act. We didn't really have a chance to see Dumbledore in a situation which would have him acting as gay. Not all gay people fall into stereotypical categories. Besides, if you need -something- to go off, he did dress very flamboyantly.
yes, but a book is a little different from real life dont you think?
A writer has to discribe the character to the reader, on my opinion, if its not in on the page, its not her interpritation of the character - not gay.
@grade9man Okay. That makes sense now that I know what she said on set. Writers do make up extensive side lines about their characters, even if details aren't mentioned in the books. It helps develop the character, so I can fully believe in her mind he was gay. But the only kind of gay he could've been that would make sense would be a closet gay that never acted on his sexuality.
@grade9man@grade9man ................... I think we've all accepted Dumbledor as a character far too busy with his goals, then saving the world to make up for his past to take any time to pursue intimate relationships with anyone man or woman. He was in effect sexless, so his preference makes little difference.
They found a building in Liverpool. I live in Liverpool!!! :-) They won't be coming down to Liverpool though they will probs just re-build it. (Just my luck) LOL xx
gosh, no.. put that new quidditch outfit away. its not supoosed to be anything like football. the old one was brilliant... this one, nah... just put it away.
I think the problem is that everyone kept complaining that Harry was looking too old so they tried to make him look younger by cutting off his hair, bu that was a mistake, it makes him look older, and the character is supposed to have really messy hair not close cropped hair. plus it is just plain ugly on him lol
woooo! the quidditch outfits....i don't like the padding but its still cool looking, im so excited, SO SO SO SO excited, i wonder if the "weasly is our king" will be in this one, or if they make ron and hermione prefects, lol thanks for posting this video.
They left alot out of the OotP movie like Ron was on the quidditch team wasn't he? And him and Hermione were prefects... i remember "weasley is our king"...that was funny
I CAN'T WAIT! AT Ieast they ACTUAIIY HAVE QUIDTAGE IN THIS ONE! I wish they showed Tonks! I can't wiat for the movie! Especiay with Quittage it's going to be great! Thanks for adding this!
This has been flagged as spam show
Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows was stunning! My younger brother and I actually noticed it released online. We found it at watchharrypotter.us
PamalaiAcevedo 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why all of my friends said that this movie wasnot interesting enough?
idontwannawaitinvain 2 years ago
yeah, i like th way th lady says th word 'mature' and 'further'. SO COOL.
xD
lekhaatwilight 2 years ago
in movie 6 harry looks younger than in movie 5 ^^
NatschePatsche 2 years ago 2
I love the accent of that woman in the end! <3
kinneyslave 2 years ago
whaha, me too
Jordyep 2 years ago
i hope this will be better than the last! i LUV the hp series
kitty12345678900 3 years ago 6
yea i like the old dumbledore this one is very agro and isnt very kind and understanding like in the books hes kinda scary in a way
the directed has missed out soo many things i think hes going to have trouble making the last movie makes scence
tillylovestheworld 3 years ago 7
i agree.
you need to include everything or the last one will be confusing [for anyone who doesnt read the books =p]
chloexchloexchloe 2 years ago
@chloexchloexchloe yeah the last book has WAY too many things happening to leave anything out. I read it more than once because I felt I missed stuff the first time and plus I really liked it..
Arizonaicedtea90 1 year ago
@tillylovestheworld I really agree about all the leaving out keeping the movies from making sense. Some of the directors don't seem to care I wonder if they will remedy anything in the last. Dumbledor wasn't just strolling down memory lane showing the memories. Harry learned vital things to the end fight and knowing his mind. They completely cut out what was important about the first memory. The facts he hated dependancy on others or being considered adverage.
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@Miracle490d WHY CAN'T THEY JUST GO BACK TO HOW THEY DID IT IN TWO AND THREE? I CAN'T BELIEVE IT'S THE SAME SCREEN WRITER OR EVEN THE SAME AUTHOR LATELY. THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO GET BETTER AT MAKING MOVIES NOT WORSE !!!
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@tillylovestheworld .....And they didn't even show any other memories. They didn't fix things like them calling Petigrew worm tail in 4 when Lupin never told the story of the map and all 3 animagus. And in 5 Cho was supposed to have been forced to tattle from the potion, so Harry should be considered a Jerk for not going back to her, but that wasn't what happened. Unless you read the books you wouldn't understand these things.
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@Miracle490d i totally agree with everything you just said it just frustrates me so much that people who dont read or just cant be bothered reading harry potter books wont understand anything thats going on. i think if i had not read the hp books i wouldn't have a clue what was going on.
harry potter and the philosophers stone would probably have to be the most accurate movie. :P
tillylovestheworld 1 year ago
@tillylovestheworld What frustrates me the worst is that all these movies are doing is cutting off the possibility that they'll ever be done right. I think I'd rather have waited years to see five the best book done right then what we got. Even if they had to do it with another cast. They missed one of the best points of doing them back to back. I was really looking forward to seeing the Riddle from part2 again. He was perfect !!! .......
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@tillylovestheworld ..........He was perfect !!! Now he would be a little older, but the memory Riddle was older too. he would've been perfect to play Riddle's father too. THAT RIDDLE THEY GOT WAS AWFUL !!!! He was smug and evil looking in Slughorns memory, even as a kid. Nothing Charming about him at all !!!! They are missing he whole point to voldemorts manipulation !!!! No one would be fooled by that. Voldemort would've been stopped at the start. They just want him shown always evil. STUPID
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@Miracle490d yea the first riddle was pretty much what i had imagined from reading the book. the thing that does annoy me quiet alot is the fact that dobby and other houselves are supposed to be in pretty much every book and dobby is supposed to help harry quiet alot and there isnt anything in the movies about Hermiones obsession with SPEW so how are they going to make the kissing scene make any sense?
tillylovestheworld 1 year ago
@tillylovestheworld I said the exact same thing about doby and kreatcher to someone else on youtube. I've especially missed doby. He really should've been there on 5 and 6. Spew was important to him helping Harry find the room of requirement. The Neville bit sucked!!!!!!!!!!! But the biggest point I made about doby is since he’s been so cut out it will mean much less at his end. Harry had a bond with his do anything for you persona. 2 alone didn’t show that. JK should’ve objected heavily.
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@tillylovestheworld But the worst part of all is how they’ve killed Harry’s passion. I loved it when Harry yelled at Ron and Hermione in 5. Then the twins say ducile tones in the movie its stupid!! They never let him rail on them. When they suggested DA he got frustrated “Stop that laughing!!!” It’s like the dummies think if harry gets angry the audience won’t like him.....
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@tillylovestheworld ....I know they’re going to ruin the scene when he hates on dumbledor over grindelwald in the next one. He has every right to be angry. It makes him real. Daniel is a great actor, he showed it in 2 and 3. But the writers or directors keep pulling him backwards. In part 5 when he says to everyone joining the DA at the 1st meeting “….you can’t know what that’s like,” instead of what JK wrote he sounds like a wuss...
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@tillylovestheworld ...What happened to, ‘when it’s just you and your guts or nerve to stop you or someone you care about from being killed,’and “it sounds great when you say it all together like that, but I had lots of help and if this hadn’t happened…” That line actually comes back in the end when Ron gets heroic. Why doesn’t JK object on important stuff instead of to dumbledor having a date with a woman? And why do these idiots waste making scenes like a date instead of making the books?
Miracle490d 1 year ago
very cool
yasmincikk 3 years ago
oh mr director, please go by the book. or else.
xDDD
iamhanabiyuu 3 years ago 14
@iamhanabiyuu AMEN!!! wish They'd stop thinking JK's stuff isn't exciting enough or visual, so they mess it up for loyal readers. Has anyone else realized how the new quidich outfit is another inconsistancy? Even her reasons she states. If it's cuz they're older how come Wood never had one? If it's for protection against more risk, why didn't Fred and george have it? The beaters go after the hard hitting Bludgers!!!
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@iamhanabiyuu @iamhanabiyuu .....The quaffle looked pretty light for the keeper and the snitch sure wouldn't hurt! Just another way to make the stars more maucho. Crap!!!
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@iamhanabiyuu .....why don't they put more money in what was really in the book instead of that junk and making excuses on what can fit. If a movie is great you don't mind sitting 3hrs. Appollo13 never got complaints.
Miracle490d 1 year ago
i dont think the new quidditch uniform is nice. is it?
myhakai 3 years ago
i prefered the origion dumberlore in the 1st and 2nd movie to the new one by far, dumbeldor is ment to be kind and loving which was the way the origional played him but the one doesnt seem to care in a way :(
AilishRowley 3 years ago 6
:0 whhyy?? lol.
kikiibaby 3 years ago
isn't it the same director as last time?
doomelf 3 years ago
i hope this director is gonna be really specific w/this one cuz if it's not...i'll be pissed!!! the last one was noothiinng. boring like heckk
kikiibaby 3 years ago 3
i reckon they shood just redo the 5th.
liamurphy62 3 years ago 3
whoa, strong words. i was just saying that Dumbledore IS gay.
StarWarsDude123 3 years ago 4
the books are so much better
mcdonaldjosh7 3 years ago
Harry Potter & The Half Blood Prince Trailer #1 REAL!
watch?v=mDJ8uF4KDF0
apnatv7 3 years ago
i know and now shes said it it makes me think that he liked harry haha
but maybe she did think that he was and just didnt put it in incase peiple didnt like the fact that he was =s but i dnt know
jake1sayer 3 years ago
She also said though, while she was writing the books... She always thought of Dumbledore as gay. Maybe, she just wanted to tell everyone her perspective.
DoDaPoomLaka 3 years ago
does it really matter if dumbldores gay? it makes no difference, its still a brilliant series!!
grade9man 3 years ago
He's not gay, you cant go though all the books with not a hint of homosexuality in his character and then suddenly anounce that he is gay.
If its not in the book, then hes not gay.
Its like sayin "Acually, its not written in the book, but on harrys broom, he has a slot where he put his dick in and that made it go faster", i dont think any of u would beleve that if she said it now.
Jk rowling only said that for media attention and money from newspapers now that her main income is now over.
DeToXdAnGlz 3 years ago
@DeToXdAnGlz ROTFLMAO I love that broom bit. Daniel might do it too, since he's into nudity..LOL. But you're right. Dumbledor couldn't be gay. He could be abstinent, since he never seemed to marry. But if he were gay it would've been in wizard papers and Rita definately would've put it out there. He was too famous to have that big secret. It may be likely that JK was thinking of a gay person when she made the character's demeanor. Maybe even someone specific; inspiration comes from all over.
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@DeToXdAnGlz It may be likely that JK was thinking of a gay person when she made the character's demeanor. Maybe even someone specific; inspiration comes from all over.
........But that doesn't make the character gay. It's just inspired by gay.
Miracle490d 1 year ago
OH NO !!!!! ROTFLMAO If he were gay I guess that explains all of his and Snapes secret rendezvous. I wouldn't have guessed Snape as a butch. ROTFLMAO
Maybe Snape really hated Harry cuz he was Jealous Dumbledor saw so much of him. Get real people! Next you'll be thinking he's a pedophile.
Miracle490d 1 year ago
I cant wait for november,is so long time again:(
lovesleyton007 3 years ago
ok
harry gets married to ginny so hes not gay
ron gets married to hermione so hes not gay
dean thomas gets married to luna so hes not gay or it might have been nevel i can't remember at the moment and draco also gets married so hes not gay the only person whos into penis is dumbledore so there
and that doesnt take away from dombledore's character at all hes still awesome
truffleshuffle16 3 years ago
dean doesn't marry luna you moron- Luna marries Rolf -the grandson of Newt Scamander( the author of fantastic beasts and where to find them) Nevel marries Hannah Abbott -yea someone doesn't have a clue
lottavideo 3 years ago
Look I love Rowling a lot, but since she failed to make Dumbledore's sexuality known in the books it is still up in the air. That is like if Tolken a few years after the LOTR series was published told everyone that after the elven ships take Frodo and company away, Lord Sauron comes back and takes over Middle-earth. Once an author steps away from her characters they no longer are their's to change.Gay or straight Dumbledore is still a brilliant character.
RuinerxxSINCITY 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
actually in an interview jk rowling said that dumbledore was gay. so ur the idiot.
lexie11294 3 years ago
ummmm no one is gay. idiots
MaryRose55 3 years ago 3
Actually Dumbledore is but he is still cool.
Laryes2 3 years ago
no he isent, he cant be because it was never said, or hinted at in the books.
DeToXdAnGlz 3 years ago
Dumbledore is NOT gay!
He cant be because it was never said or hinted on in the books.
You cant finish a book and then just anaounce out of teh blue that a character is gay.
She only sead it for money from newspapeers and such cuz her main income is now over.
DeToXdAnGlz 3 years ago
seriously, she doesn't need to write in the book that dumbldore is gay! she wrote the book and this is how she designed the character. and the only reason it came out that he was gay was that in one of the movies they wanted to have an old girlfriend of his come in and since she is able to say yes or to the movie she said they couldn't have that scene in because he is gay.
And why would she say it just for money? shes richer then the QUEEN, She doesn't need more money whens shes that rich!!!!
grade9man 3 years ago
lol im sure she is richer then the queen, there broke atm apparently :)
No but yeh ur right she dosent need nomey, but, honestly did you think he was gay when you read the books?
I dont think anybody did, so the character cant be gay if it isent even hinted on though out all the books, dosent matter if she ment ppl to think he was gay, cuz if she didnt say he was, he isent!
DeToXdAnGlz 3 years ago
just because he doesn't act gay doesn't mean it's impossible for him to be gay. i know ppl that are gay but done't act gay. and about the money, she gets part of every harry potter merchindise that are sold world wide, and so far has like 1.1 billion dollars to her name.
grade9man 3 years ago
...yeh i know, thats why i said "yeh your right she dosent need the money"
And so what if u know ppl who are gay but dont act it, if the book dosent describe a character as gay , and dosent have them do gay things, then its not in the text, so the characters not.
Thats just my view on it.
DeToXdAnGlz 3 years ago
well your intitled to your opinion
grade9man 3 years ago
But if you consider that - what about the people who don't act heterosexual? You just assume they are because they are a majority. It sounds like you're putting too much stock in how gay people "should" act. We didn't really have a chance to see Dumbledore in a situation which would have him acting as gay. Not all gay people fall into stereotypical categories. Besides, if you need -something- to go off, he did dress very flamboyantly.
Padfoot934 3 years ago
yes, but a book is a little different from real life dont you think?
A writer has to discribe the character to the reader, on my opinion, if its not in on the page, its not her interpritation of the character - not gay.
DeToXdAnGlz 3 years ago
You're right !
ninip0w 3 years ago
@grade9man Okay. That makes sense now that I know what she said on set. Writers do make up extensive side lines about their characters, even if details aren't mentioned in the books. It helps develop the character, so I can fully believe in her mind he was gay. But the only kind of gay he could've been that would make sense would be a closet gay that never acted on his sexuality.
Miracle490d 1 year ago
@grade9man @grade9man ................... I think we've all accepted Dumbledor as a character far too busy with his goals, then saving the world to make up for his past to take any time to pursue intimate relationships with anyone man or woman. He was in effect sexless, so his preference makes little difference.
Miracle490d 1 year ago
no, he IS gay, dumbass.
StarWarsDude123 3 years ago
4 fuck sake ron is NOT gay He kisses hermione.
dumbledore is gay
and harry kisses ginny!
there u go
TB1991TB 3 years ago
They found a building in Liverpool. I live in Liverpool!!! :-) They won't be coming down to Liverpool though they will probs just re-build it. (Just my luck) LOL xx
edwardcullenxx1901 3 years ago
quiddich outfits are really cool ... i like the slythering outfits .. too bad draco doesnt want to wear them.
AccioSmileyFace 3 years ago
okay, no lie but i heard that ron turns out to be gay.
I swear to God!
that's what i heard.
TiAmo729 3 years ago
O.o WHAT?!
kibasmybadboy 3 years ago
ron's not gay ... he marries hermione and has 2 kids ,.. rose and hugo ...
dumbledore is gay with gwindlewald ... j.k rowling said it herself
AccioSmileyFace 3 years ago 3
Oh Em Gee! I just love how you give away what happends later.
Jeez, you coulda just said that ron's not gay i read the book or w/e!
TiAmo729 3 years ago
well the books been out for months now .. i mean if u havent read it yet then ,, omg
AccioSmileyFace 3 years ago 4
Plus, everyone knows Ron gets together with Hermione... it's obvious since book 4
jess1z1 3 years ago
def ... even in book 3 when they touch hands .. or is that just the movie? i havent read it in a while
AccioSmileyFace 3 years ago
i know!
like i totally agree!
if people really liked the harry potter series, they would have finsihed it a long time ago
kris10210 3 years ago
shut up.
Elle1Tree 3 years ago
Ron isn't gay it is dumbledore
alinasofya 3 years ago
Yeah right...
zizigreece 3 years ago
even if you heard that in the 7th book Ron and Hermione kiss straight on the mouth passionly for a while.....
masterchief335 3 years ago 3
Um that kiss is harry and ginny not ron and hermione. R/Hr foreva!!!
alinasofya 3 years ago
no at the battle of hogwarts in the 7th book they kiss read that chapter again
masterchief335 3 years ago 3
I know but there talking about that kiss in the video and they said it was ron and hermione but it is harry and ginny
alinasofya 3 years ago
thats one hundred percent of a lie.
kris10210 3 years ago
Ron isn't gay it is dumbledore!!
alinasofya 3 years ago
Amazing awesome, i am already quivering with anticipation
onigiri815 3 years ago
LOL i know. but i still believe him to look great with the Goblet of Fire hair but i personally am in love with rupert and neville
onigiri815 3 years ago
I think dans hair in normal!!! So not EVERYONE thinks his hair is weird! Sheesh
Ginnyrox888 3 years ago
There's nothing wrong with Dan's hair.
Why don't you all SHUT UP about it, bloody moaning ALL THE TIME.
You make me puke with your constant whining about everything!!!!!
ccdrlt 3 years ago
gosh, no.. put that new quidditch outfit away. its not supoosed to be anything like football. the old one was brilliant... this one, nah... just put it away.
au6057 3 years ago 2
I am agree, I hate his hair, now..XD I liked it when it was like the 4th or the 3rd movie..
Bayyau 4 years ago
yeh.. Dans hair is getting worst...
Ginnyrox888 4 years ago
No, it really isn't.
mellyxmorphine 4 years ago 2
i liked it better when it was longer and not really short like it was in the 5th movie
xbassistx87 4 years ago 11
I think the problem is that everyone kept complaining that Harry was looking too old so they tried to make him look younger by cutting off his hair, bu that was a mistake, it makes him look older, and the character is supposed to have really messy hair not close cropped hair. plus it is just plain ugly on him lol
Bowie281 3 years ago 2
I love Dan and everything.. but his hair is getting worse with each film...
:/
But Dan is still totally hot xD
o0o0Issy0o0o 4 years ago
hehe. his hair was best in the 3rd, just normal hair i guess. not too long or short. in the 4th its a bit long but still cute.
ngdebby 4 years ago 5
Yeah! Exactley. Now it justs looks.. uhh. bowl cuttish. aha.
o0o0Issy0o0o 4 years ago
haha :) agreed!
ngdebby 4 years ago
Aha, Yay! xD
o0o0Issy0o0o 4 years ago
wait....how did you get all the sneak peaks of the upcoming movie?
disneyfilipina 4 years ago
Bloody perfect you are! Thanks so so so much! Merlin, I can't wait for it to come out! Blimey, this feels weird LOL
Kay, that was stupid of me! I just love their accents && the way they talk, it's just..yeah LOL Thx for postin!
PreciousHunnii 4 years ago 3
woooo! the quidditch outfits....i don't like the padding but its still cool looking, im so excited, SO SO SO SO excited, i wonder if the "weasly is our king" will be in this one, or if they make ron and hermione prefects, lol thanks for posting this video.
weasly7gryffindor 4 years ago 5
Thanks for posting ^_^
LeanceHP 4 years ago 3
its alright...
gslice55 4 years ago
its alrite
gslice55 4 years ago
I CANT WAIT YAYAYAY
Wendy2champ95 4 years ago 2
They left alot out of the OotP movie like Ron was on the quidditch team wasn't he? And him and Hermione were prefects... i remember "weasley is our king"...that was funny
mariposahierra08 4 years ago
I CAN'T WAIT! AT Ieast they ACTUAIIY HAVE QUIDTAGE IN THIS ONE! I wish they showed Tonks! I can't wiat for the movie! Especiay with Quittage it's going to be great! Thanks for adding this!
ActingFireAqua 4 years ago 5
its quidditch u narb
wizrdgrl 4 years ago
I KNOW BEAST. I just don't know how to speII it, so get over it... quidditch quidditch quid ditch quidditch quidditch ... kk... I think I got it now!
ActingFireAqua 4 years ago 3
lol hilarious not that you mispelled it just because of this er...conversation
nattielicious2006 4 years ago
haha! : ) Thanks!
ActingFireAqua 4 years ago
exelent!!
vanessakid 4 years ago 6
Perfeito... esta excelente esse Sneek peak
RUTECSIGIRL16 4 years ago 6
can't wait for this movie. its going to rock
shipleykristen 4 years ago 7