Pye has never claimed that the mother of the child wasn’t human, he only claims that father has not been confirmed as human, and until such a time when the parentage can be proved with useful lengths of nuclear DNA opinions will remain divided.
@SpartanSalvation I am sorry, but that is not how science works. Until such time as Pye provides evidences to the contrary, then the skull is presumed to be human. There has never been evidence provided to dispute this and there is not a single scientist on the planet who has supported Pye.
Answer: Because they KNOW that the results then must be a hoax or flawed.
If this is not a indication of a belief system then I don’t know what is. How can we move knowledge forward if we aren’t even willing to look? It is time for mainstream to wake up and look for alternative ideas.
The fact that archeologists aren’t clamoring over this skull, a skull that has been know of for many many years is just another indication that it falls outside their “box” of beliefs. Now in 2010 the skull has been shown to contain DNA that has NEVER been catalogued before. Why then aren’t the academics interested?
@SpartanSalvation No, archeologists are not clamoring over this because as far as they are concerned, there is nothing that strange about it. Malformed skulls do happen and have happened through the ages, with never any need for alien intervention. Have you been watching too many sci-fi movies instead of finsihing high school biology? Come on man, seriously. What grade did you finish in public school?
It is very hard for a skeptic to break free from a l lifetime of indoctrinated thought. Just reflect on how it took for the church to accept changes. (You know like the the earth is not in the center of the universe),… The scientific community is having similar issues as it too has become a “belief” system, and this is why they cannot accept the possibility that this is not a hoax.
@SpartanSalvation The argument here is simply one that has never been supported with evidence. Never has there been a single publication in a credible scientific journal where a single piece of data has ever been provided to support this crap. If you are using a computer, then a scientist invented all that you rely on, yet you refuse to acknowledge that there is no science to support Pye's assertions about this skull. You simply do not possess the education necessary to understand the science.
Ah yes, that word: Science. What a loaded word. Almost as loaded as the word "God".
I'm with Pye on this. I don't align with the paid off "community" that are too afraid of their own shadows to step outside the box, unless of course their masters let them..grow up and realize the Reality Around You.
@omaxpi But you will align with someon who uses the lexicon of "science" when it conveniently makes what he is doing sound legitimate? Sounds to me like you don't know anything at all about science. Any scientist would give their left arm to have their name on a study that legitimately demonstrated what Pye is claiming. My suggestion to you is either get the education in science, or leave it to the experts.
@omaxpi How about you explain then how someone can come to a conclusion as Pye has, with abslutely no data to support his hypothesis? Never has he published a single word in a credible scientific journal, never has he ever demonstrated evidence for what he has claimed, no over 10 years of spewing nonsense. Perhaps you can explain what "logical fallacies" even means. Go to school and get the degrees in science and then comment.
I think you're extremely brainwashed. Your brand of elitist attitude and propagandized learning won't work on me. I am free, creative, intuitive and I can see Reality for what it is. I'm sorry you need to keep referencing useless trinkets given by the criminal officials from colleges instead of your own ability to discern information on your own. good luck with that left brain of yours.
@omaxpi Simply because you don't have an education does not make it my fault, nor does it make me "brainwashed". What kind of lame excuse is that for your own choices and limitations? If you were too frigging lazy to go to university, how is that society's problem? What have you contributed to society in any way that has made it a better place? Have you cured a disease? Don't tell me, you work for NASA. Give me a break. Use science and fact, and don't cry like a baby.
@omaxpi Next time you or your family need to go to the doctor, be thankful that the folks providing the care are far better educated and have much more expertise than either you or Pye. The problem is, you are just so ignorant, you just don't know it. It is difficult to imagine how people can be so profoundly stupid and removed from the best and brightest minds that society has.
@SpartanSalvation For someone who has no education, your comment is a bit ironic, no? I mean, what do you know of the science that you comment on? When people talk about "hoaxes", they do so given that Pye has no education whatsoever in science and yet makes claims regarding the genetics of this skull. He has likewise no expertise in any discipline of study and he has never provided evidence to support claims. For people like you who have no education, you believe what he tells you.
Taken by itself criticism of the the star child skull makes some sense. However the case for authenticity of the skull is greatly strengthen by the confluence of many other pieces of evidence. The more you take time to understand the hard core studies of UFOlogists the more you’ll come to understand that this skull is very likely real. Also if you actually spend time studying what proponents of the “Ancient Astronaut” theory are saying then you are even more likely to understand .
@SpartanSalvation I am sorry, but there is simply no "confluence" of evidence when none of the "evidence" has ever been corroborated by any independent investigative scientists. You speak about this skull as if you are in possession of such expertise, yet I bet that you do not possess such education. I would bet that you have never taken a single university-level science course before, have you?
By the way buddy , I got my own house , car , job and a good education and a shit load of money saved up , motherfucking bum SkepticUn as nothing else to do , hahaha , pussy .
@SpartanSalvation "I got my own house , car , job and a good education and a shit load of money saved up , motherfucking bum SkepticUn as nothing else to do , hahaha , pussy ."
How impressive. Now that I know that about you, I will just drop the entire issue because you are an expert.
hahaha dummy SkepticUn underneath me , seems like your on youtube more than me , lol . Pretty mad too . Seriously to come back on the solidity of the Skull check out Lloyd Pyes website and they talk about it and on other videos too , if you believe in the DNA test then you ll believe this . I dont know why you keep freaking out about that , are you afraid ?
@SpartanSalvation Why would anyone refer to Pye's website for information? And what does "solidity of the Skull" refer to? Have you finished high school? Seriously, just get a real education instead of reading bs from some clown who you want to believe. Reading your comments gives me the impression that you believe everything on the Internet because you just don't know one way or the other.
they said that the bone was 2 to 3 times stronger when they mentioned that they had to use a diamond cutter saw to remove a piece of the starchild skull , Skeptic your a dummy , read more .
@SpartanSalvation Are you so under educated that you can type what you heard on a frigging YouTube video and believe it to be true with no supporting scientific research? Have you finished high school? Who says that the bones is 2-3 times as strong as anything?? That is my question to YOU because simply because someone says this does not make it factual. Holy crap man, get a frigging education.
@SpartanSalvation Are you serious? Simply because somebody claims that they used a "diamond cutter", doesn't mean that they actually did. That is why findings have to be published in credible scientific journals, so that they have undergone "peer-review". Then, other researchers can repeat the experiments to actually see if they get the same of different results. Why don't you know anything about how science, real science, is actually conducted? Go to university and get an education.
Someone should go back to that location in Mexico and dig up the rest of the washed up bones from the storm . I am sure that they are still bones somewhere in that desert . Lloyd Pye mentioned that those bones are 2 to 3 times stronger than human bones , so I would assume that there still out there somewhere . Lloyd Pye is an extremely smart man and I have learned a lot about the world because of him (bigfoot , yeti, pre-humans , aliens and humans) . Were all connected some how .
@SpartanSalvation Who says that the bones that you claim Pye refers to are "2 to 3 times stronger than human bones"?? Pye? Come on, why do you think that experts in a field of research actually have the education in that area to make the expert statements? Pye has a psychology degree and has never conducted and published a single piece of credible research. Expert in taking a warm bubble bath, but nothing else.
@rehsab01 Providing a link to a video is not "peer-review", idiot. How about you try going to university and get the degrees in science so that you know what you are talking about, k? Perhaps then you would have enough knowledge to see that this crap is laughable.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Haha I completely agree. Hes a bit of a nut. Think its about time to retire old man. This is borderline pseudoscience just broadly waffeling on getting the most rudimentary science wrong.
@LcoolJfiveoh Here is a "counter statement": He has never published a single word of credible research in a single scientific journal on the planet, yet he makes claims that are not supported by science. Simply because some claown makes claims on his personal website does not make it science or factual.
@TheSkepticUn well since you are on such a mission are you going to provide a counter statement over why DNA test's show the starchild only has 1 human parent or are you just going to sit there and call him lier?
its been a week and i think you nor anybody else can in the mainstream science community can explain it so u call him lier and fluff it off why are you so qiuet all of a sudden?
@LcoolJfiveoh If you actually knew anything about science, you would appreciate that it is not (ever) up to the auidnece to disprove the claims made by anyone. The burden of proof always lies in the lap of the claimee to provide evidence. In this case, no evidence has ever been provided that has passed the test of science. Nothing has ever been published in any scientific journal that supports this bs.
@LcoolJfiveoh As for your comment on the "DNA tests", well lets' start out with the two that demonstrated that there was nothing "alien" about the parents. How did a 'Y' chromosome present itself if it can only come from a human father? But more importantly, do you really know what you are talking about? I mean, really, do you have any education on biological science at all at the level of anyone who is considered to have expertise in such a topic?
@LcoolJfiveoh I just did give you the counter...He has used 'sciency'-sounding words, but he has not used the scientific method to derive any findings. He has provided no data anywhere and never described his methodology (ie. procedure, statistical analysis, etc.). Without this, there is simply nothing that any scientist would look twice at. How can he draw a conclusion BEFORE deriving the findings? He already claimed that the father must have been an alien prior to the evidence.
@LcoolJfiveoh Every single statement that he makes should be supported by independent analyses. Videos and photos are not what scientists use as evidence. DATA derived from whatever methodology he has used should be reported and it is this that his conclusions should be based. Where is that part, I wonder? Never been presented = BOGUS.
The Starchild project is not up against scientific counter arguments but is up against the 3 stages of truth. The first stage is ridiculed, the second stage is violently opposed and the third stage it is accepted as being self-evident. TheSkepticUn is a very fine example of the three stages of truth as it is clear he is in the second stage. Notice how none that argue against the Starchild do so in a calm manor but instead use ridicule before violently opposing!
It was decided that no star can reach high enough temperature for the process of nuclear fusion to produce the heavier elements and as such it was concluded that all stars in the universe must have existed as a single star. Fred Hoyle PHD and nuclear physicists proved that one star can produce all known elements. The scientific evidence against the big bang is overwhelming but because of popular belief no one knows anything about it. Alternative knowledge is science just not popular science!
The Starchild project is not up against scientific counter arguments but is up against the 3 stages of truth. The first stage is ridiculed, the second stage is violently opposed and the third stage it is accepted as being self-evident. TheSkepticUn is a very fine example of the three stages of truth as it is clear he is in the second stage. Notice how none that argue against the Starchild do so in a calm manor but instead use ridicule before violently opposing!
Lloyd really puts things into perspective! He makes so many points that really make you think. I’ve researched his work and you should too. The new DNA results prove the Starchild is not human! Are you on the edge of your seat because I am? Lloyd Pye may just be the first person ever to prove that we are not alone in the universe! Soon he will have enough evidence to show the world he has made the greatest discovery in the whole of human history!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@wlfmi Enough of your whacked out BS! You don't have a clue what you are talking about. This guy is a LOON with absolutely no research history whatsoever, and not a stitich of science to support these ridiculous contentions. Ask you self why there has never been published a single word of any of this in a credible, peer-reviewed scientific journal. The answer is that it is laughable and no scientist has ever stood behind any of it, despite all the talk of "DNA analysis". BULLSHIPS!
This guy is the biggest hoakster going. There is no evidence that this skull is not human. Sorry, but, hydrocephaly is mosat certainly a reasonable explanation. Anything other-worldly requires substantially more evidence than is present now.
This all raises myriad philosophical questions.If we are genetically altered slaves cloned from an advanced species, then things like God, morality, free will, freedom, self-realization, the self, being, existentialism, justice, empathy, meaning of life, and I guess most of philosophy and all of theology.We know there will be philosophical changes but will there also be technological changes?Those which can solve the more tangible issues we face today like hunger, shelter, poverty and pollution.
Completely agree, it can't/won't be blown open for multiple reasons. What strikes me is my own reaction to the facts presented. I needed to 'wake up' and focus on the hard evidence to 'believe'. Lloys recognises that 'for extra ordinary finds you require extra ordinary evidence'. Even if he should obtain this I have a feeling the 'smokescreen' of false evidence in his way may lessen the realisation. We may miss the truth and carry on regardless due to the social conditioning we've had.
I've been a believer pretty much all my life and I feel better now that more tangible evidence is popping up.I know people only believe things based on tangible, objective, quantifiable evidence and here we have it and it's still being "ignored". I'm interested in seeing how this all plays "in Peoria" as they say.And even then who will we trust for our information after a few truths have been revealed?How much truth are they going to give us?How much can we handle?
I think we're missing the point? Even if science can't/won't prove this is E.T, the fact science also can't prove it's human in the 21st century is huge news. Why can't someone tell me what it is in an age where we have the tools to take a 1000 year old tooth, extract the DNA and accurately detail that beings mother and father; their origin, ethnicity, hair colour, eyes etc. why can't we prove this is human? Something is wrong here? It should be easy to disprove Pye's claims yet nobody has?
I agree but for some reason it's just not registering on the radar that this is a huge discovery. It's an unknown to science which alone should be mega news... but it's not being treated like it is.
Let's say they did make this mega news. How would that play out? It's a Pandora's box that would change everything instantly.I'd love to see it but there are very powerful forces in control who don't want to lose their control.Someone alluded to the Project Bluebeam false flag stunt being kicked off by the find of an archaeological relic which rewrites our known history and turns the world upside down.Maybe the technical software isn't ready and that's why it is taking so long to hit mainstream?
I have never been a 'believer' and listen interestedly with an open mind to what people say regarding the paranormal and the extraterrestrial, but remain sceptical until there is proof and evidence. Because I have seen so much rubbish ( mainly on youtube ) when you eventually see some credible science behind something associated with the 'rubbish' you almost get a slap in the face and have to wake yourself up. Lloyd hay need to do this to everyone if his work is to get recognition.
yes because weve been so fine tuned from cradle to grave for years by these elite people who run the show.. like david icke says we police each other now on whats real or not.. the manipulators have done a good job on limiting the human brain on what it can perceive.. and its this sort of programming we need to delete from our minds and start to except that ther is extrodinary things happening.
thanks for the uploads, this is the second set i've watched from the leeds exopolitics expo. remarkable that here we an ET skull and it's largely unknown to the world a decade after its discovery.
Pye has never claimed that the mother of the child wasn’t human, he only claims that father has not been confirmed as human, and until such a time when the parentage can be proved with useful lengths of nuclear DNA opinions will remain divided.
SpartanSalvation 9 months ago
@SpartanSalvation I am sorry, but that is not how science works. Until such time as Pye provides evidences to the contrary, then the skull is presumed to be human. There has never been evidence provided to dispute this and there is not a single scientist on the planet who has supported Pye.
TheSkepticUn 8 months ago
Answer: Because they KNOW that the results then must be a hoax or flawed.
If this is not a indication of a belief system then I don’t know what is. How can we move knowledge forward if we aren’t even willing to look? It is time for mainstream to wake up and look for alternative ideas.
SpartanSalvation 9 months ago
The fact that archeologists aren’t clamoring over this skull, a skull that has been know of for many many years is just another indication that it falls outside their “box” of beliefs. Now in 2010 the skull has been shown to contain DNA that has NEVER been catalogued before. Why then aren’t the academics interested?
SpartanSalvation 9 months ago
@SpartanSalvation No, archeologists are not clamoring over this because as far as they are concerned, there is nothing that strange about it. Malformed skulls do happen and have happened through the ages, with never any need for alien intervention. Have you been watching too many sci-fi movies instead of finsihing high school biology? Come on man, seriously. What grade did you finish in public school?
TheSkepticUn 8 months ago
It is very hard for a skeptic to break free from a l lifetime of indoctrinated thought. Just reflect on how it took for the church to accept changes. (You know like the the earth is not in the center of the universe),… The scientific community is having similar issues as it too has become a “belief” system, and this is why they cannot accept the possibility that this is not a hoax.
SpartanSalvation 9 months ago
@SpartanSalvation The argument here is simply one that has never been supported with evidence. Never has there been a single publication in a credible scientific journal where a single piece of data has ever been provided to support this crap. If you are using a computer, then a scientist invented all that you rely on, yet you refuse to acknowledge that there is no science to support Pye's assertions about this skull. You simply do not possess the education necessary to understand the science.
TheSkepticUn 8 months ago
@TheSkepticUn
Ah yes, that word: Science. What a loaded word. Almost as loaded as the word "God".
I'm with Pye on this. I don't align with the paid off "community" that are too afraid of their own shadows to step outside the box, unless of course their masters let them..grow up and realize the Reality Around You.
omaxpi 7 months ago
@omaxpi But you will align with someon who uses the lexicon of "science" when it conveniently makes what he is doing sound legitimate? Sounds to me like you don't know anything at all about science. Any scientist would give their left arm to have their name on a study that legitimately demonstrated what Pye is claiming. My suggestion to you is either get the education in science, or leave it to the experts.
TheSkepticUn 7 months ago
@TheSkepticUn
you argue with logical fallacies. Appeal to Authority, eh?
"leave it to the experts"
fuck the experts.
omaxpi 7 months ago
@omaxpi How about you explain then how someone can come to a conclusion as Pye has, with abslutely no data to support his hypothesis? Never has he published a single word in a credible scientific journal, never has he ever demonstrated evidence for what he has claimed, no over 10 years of spewing nonsense. Perhaps you can explain what "logical fallacies" even means. Go to school and get the degrees in science and then comment.
TheSkepticUn 7 months ago
@TheSkepticUn
I think you're extremely brainwashed. Your brand of elitist attitude and propagandized learning won't work on me. I am free, creative, intuitive and I can see Reality for what it is. I'm sorry you need to keep referencing useless trinkets given by the criminal officials from colleges instead of your own ability to discern information on your own. good luck with that left brain of yours.
omaxpi 7 months ago
@omaxpi Simply because you don't have an education does not make it my fault, nor does it make me "brainwashed". What kind of lame excuse is that for your own choices and limitations? If you were too frigging lazy to go to university, how is that society's problem? What have you contributed to society in any way that has made it a better place? Have you cured a disease? Don't tell me, you work for NASA. Give me a break. Use science and fact, and don't cry like a baby.
TheSkepticUn 7 months ago
@omaxpi Next time you or your family need to go to the doctor, be thankful that the folks providing the care are far better educated and have much more expertise than either you or Pye. The problem is, you are just so ignorant, you just don't know it. It is difficult to imagine how people can be so profoundly stupid and removed from the best and brightest minds that society has.
TheSkepticUn 7 months ago
@SpartanSalvation For someone who has no education, your comment is a bit ironic, no? I mean, what do you know of the science that you comment on? When people talk about "hoaxes", they do so given that Pye has no education whatsoever in science and yet makes claims regarding the genetics of this skull. He has likewise no expertise in any discipline of study and he has never provided evidence to support claims. For people like you who have no education, you believe what he tells you.
TheSkepticUn 7 months ago
Taken by itself criticism of the the star child skull makes some sense. However the case for authenticity of the skull is greatly strengthen by the confluence of many other pieces of evidence. The more you take time to understand the hard core studies of UFOlogists the more you’ll come to understand that this skull is very likely real. Also if you actually spend time studying what proponents of the “Ancient Astronaut” theory are saying then you are even more likely to understand .
SpartanSalvation 9 months ago
@SpartanSalvation I am sorry, but there is simply no "confluence" of evidence when none of the "evidence" has ever been corroborated by any independent investigative scientists. You speak about this skull as if you are in possession of such expertise, yet I bet that you do not possess such education. I would bet that you have never taken a single university-level science course before, have you?
TheSkepticUn 8 months ago
By the way buddy , I got my own house , car , job and a good education and a shit load of money saved up , motherfucking bum SkepticUn as nothing else to do , hahaha , pussy .
SpartanSalvation 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SpartanSalvation "I got my own house , car , job and a good education and a shit load of money saved up , motherfucking bum SkepticUn as nothing else to do , hahaha , pussy ."
How impressive. Now that I know that about you, I will just drop the entire issue because you are an expert.
Retarded goof.
TheSkepticUn 9 months ago
hahaha dummy SkepticUn underneath me , seems like your on youtube more than me , lol . Pretty mad too . Seriously to come back on the solidity of the Skull check out Lloyd Pyes website and they talk about it and on other videos too , if you believe in the DNA test then you ll believe this . I dont know why you keep freaking out about that , are you afraid ?
SpartanSalvation 9 months ago
@SpartanSalvation Why would anyone refer to Pye's website for information? And what does "solidity of the Skull" refer to? Have you finished high school? Seriously, just get a real education instead of reading bs from some clown who you want to believe. Reading your comments gives me the impression that you believe everything on the Internet because you just don't know one way or the other.
TheSkepticUn 9 months ago
they said that the bone was 2 to 3 times stronger when they mentioned that they had to use a diamond cutter saw to remove a piece of the starchild skull , Skeptic your a dummy , read more .
SpartanSalvation 9 months ago
@SpartanSalvation Are you so under educated that you can type what you heard on a frigging YouTube video and believe it to be true with no supporting scientific research? Have you finished high school? Who says that the bones is 2-3 times as strong as anything?? That is my question to YOU because simply because someone says this does not make it factual. Holy crap man, get a frigging education.
TheSkepticUn 9 months ago
@SpartanSalvation Are you serious? Simply because somebody claims that they used a "diamond cutter", doesn't mean that they actually did. That is why findings have to be published in credible scientific journals, so that they have undergone "peer-review". Then, other researchers can repeat the experiments to actually see if they get the same of different results. Why don't you know anything about how science, real science, is actually conducted? Go to university and get an education.
TheSkepticUn 9 months ago
Someone should go back to that location in Mexico and dig up the rest of the washed up bones from the storm . I am sure that they are still bones somewhere in that desert . Lloyd Pye mentioned that those bones are 2 to 3 times stronger than human bones , so I would assume that there still out there somewhere . Lloyd Pye is an extremely smart man and I have learned a lot about the world because of him (bigfoot , yeti, pre-humans , aliens and humans) . Were all connected some how .
SpartanSalvation 10 months ago
@SpartanSalvation Who says that the bones that you claim Pye refers to are "2 to 3 times stronger than human bones"?? Pye? Come on, why do you think that experts in a field of research actually have the education in that area to make the expert statements? Pye has a psychology degree and has never conducted and published a single piece of credible research. Expert in taking a warm bubble bath, but nothing else.
TheSkepticUn 9 months ago
Why no "scientific peer review"? Check this: watch?v=ePUy4npHOmQ
Simply said, due to current dogmatic science policies will not touch highly extraordinary (or "controversial") subjects.
rehsab01 1 year ago
@rehsab01 Providing a link to a video is not "peer-review", idiot. How about you try going to university and get the degrees in science so that you know what you are talking about, k? Perhaps then you would have enough knowledge to see that this crap is laughable.
TheSkepticUn 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Haha I completely agree. Hes a bit of a nut. Think its about time to retire old man. This is borderline pseudoscience just broadly waffeling on getting the most rudimentary science wrong.
ritjo870 1 year ago
@ritjo870 ok
give me some counter statements against his arguments
LcoolJfiveoh 9 months ago
@LcoolJfiveoh Here is a "counter statement": He has never published a single word of credible research in a single scientific journal on the planet, yet he makes claims that are not supported by science. Simply because some claown makes claims on his personal website does not make it science or factual.
TheSkepticUn 9 months ago
@TheSkepticUn no thats not what i meant...
i dont mean for u to simply say "he dosent know what hes talking about"
i dont care about his credentials i care about what he is saying.
instead of crying out "LIER" like a simpleton, why not make a worthy
effort and give a counter statement as to how the DNA test's show the starchild only has 1 human parent
LcoolJfiveoh 9 months ago
@TheSkepticUn well since you are on such a mission are you going to provide a counter statement over why DNA test's show the starchild only has 1 human parent or are you just going to sit there and call him lier?
its been a week and i think you nor anybody else can in the mainstream science community can explain it so u call him lier and fluff it off why are you so qiuet all of a sudden?
what is the explanation for the DNA test's? cmon
LcoolJfiveoh 9 months ago
@LcoolJfiveoh If you actually knew anything about science, you would appreciate that it is not (ever) up to the auidnece to disprove the claims made by anyone. The burden of proof always lies in the lap of the claimee to provide evidence. In this case, no evidence has ever been provided that has passed the test of science. Nothing has ever been published in any scientific journal that supports this bs.
TheSkepticUn 9 months ago
@LcoolJfiveoh As for your comment on the "DNA tests", well lets' start out with the two that demonstrated that there was nothing "alien" about the parents. How did a 'Y' chromosome present itself if it can only come from a human father? But more importantly, do you really know what you are talking about? I mean, really, do you have any education on biological science at all at the level of anyone who is considered to have expertise in such a topic?
TheSkepticUn 9 months ago
@TheSkepticUn
-_-
u sound just like the people who argued the Earth was the center of the universe.
take care
LcoolJfiveoh 9 months ago
@LcoolJfiveoh I just did give you the counter...He has used 'sciency'-sounding words, but he has not used the scientific method to derive any findings. He has provided no data anywhere and never described his methodology (ie. procedure, statistical analysis, etc.). Without this, there is simply nothing that any scientist would look twice at. How can he draw a conclusion BEFORE deriving the findings? He already claimed that the father must have been an alien prior to the evidence.
TheSkepticUn 9 months ago
@LcoolJfiveoh Every single statement that he makes should be supported by independent analyses. Videos and photos are not what scientists use as evidence. DATA derived from whatever methodology he has used should be reported and it is this that his conclusions should be based. Where is that part, I wonder? Never been presented = BOGUS.
TheSkepticUn 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Starchild project is not up against scientific counter arguments but is up against the 3 stages of truth. The first stage is ridiculed, the second stage is violently opposed and the third stage it is accepted as being self-evident. TheSkepticUn is a very fine example of the three stages of truth as it is clear he is in the second stage. Notice how none that argue against the Starchild do so in a calm manor but instead use ridicule before violently opposing!
wlfmi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It was decided that no star can reach high enough temperature for the process of nuclear fusion to produce the heavier elements and as such it was concluded that all stars in the universe must have existed as a single star. Fred Hoyle PHD and nuclear physicists proved that one star can produce all known elements. The scientific evidence against the big bang is overwhelming but because of popular belief no one knows anything about it. Alternative knowledge is science just not popular science!
wlfmi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Starchild project is not up against scientific counter arguments but is up against the 3 stages of truth. The first stage is ridiculed, the second stage is violently opposed and the third stage it is accepted as being self-evident. TheSkepticUn is a very fine example of the three stages of truth as it is clear he is in the second stage. Notice how none that argue against the Starchild do so in a calm manor but instead use ridicule before violently opposing!
wlfmi 1 year ago
Lloyd really puts things into perspective! He makes so many points that really make you think. I’ve researched his work and you should too. The new DNA results prove the Starchild is not human! Are you on the edge of your seat because I am? Lloyd Pye may just be the first person ever to prove that we are not alone in the universe! Soon he will have enough evidence to show the world he has made the greatest discovery in the whole of human history!
wlfmi 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@wlfmi Enough of your whacked out BS! You don't have a clue what you are talking about. This guy is a LOON with absolutely no research history whatsoever, and not a stitich of science to support these ridiculous contentions. Ask you self why there has never been published a single word of any of this in a credible, peer-reviewed scientific journal. The answer is that it is laughable and no scientist has ever stood behind any of it, despite all the talk of "DNA analysis". BULLSHIPS!
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
@TheSkepticUn you are crying in the rain pally
LcoolJfiveoh 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This guy is the biggest hoakster going. There is no evidence that this skull is not human. Sorry, but, hydrocephaly is mosat certainly a reasonable explanation. Anything other-worldly requires substantially more evidence than is present now.
Con-man ripping people off to buy his book!
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
The SEM results are certainly interesting. Could suggest it evolved in a different environment.
SpruikerSlayer 1 year ago
He keeps saying "design" to describe the development and form of this skull. Might be best to avoid that.
coaldusty 2 years ago
7:25; 8:00; 8:50; 9:40;
HuckleberrySlim 2 years ago
This all raises myriad philosophical questions.If we are genetically altered slaves cloned from an advanced species, then things like God, morality, free will, freedom, self-realization, the self, being, existentialism, justice, empathy, meaning of life, and I guess most of philosophy and all of theology.We know there will be philosophical changes but will there also be technological changes?Those which can solve the more tangible issues we face today like hunger, shelter, poverty and pollution.
bottleslingguy 2 years ago
to finish my point earlier on philosophy and theology; they will go the way of the dinosaurs.
(sorry editing mistake)
bottleslingguy 2 years ago
Completely agree, it can't/won't be blown open for multiple reasons. What strikes me is my own reaction to the facts presented. I needed to 'wake up' and focus on the hard evidence to 'believe'. Lloys recognises that 'for extra ordinary finds you require extra ordinary evidence'. Even if he should obtain this I have a feeling the 'smokescreen' of false evidence in his way may lessen the realisation. We may miss the truth and carry on regardless due to the social conditioning we've had.
celebritysketches 2 years ago
I've been a believer pretty much all my life and I feel better now that more tangible evidence is popping up.I know people only believe things based on tangible, objective, quantifiable evidence and here we have it and it's still being "ignored". I'm interested in seeing how this all plays "in Peoria" as they say.And even then who will we trust for our information after a few truths have been revealed?How much truth are they going to give us?How much can we handle?
bottleslingguy 2 years ago
I think we're missing the point? Even if science can't/won't prove this is E.T, the fact science also can't prove it's human in the 21st century is huge news. Why can't someone tell me what it is in an age where we have the tools to take a 1000 year old tooth, extract the DNA and accurately detail that beings mother and father; their origin, ethnicity, hair colour, eyes etc. why can't we prove this is human? Something is wrong here? It should be easy to disprove Pye's claims yet nobody has?
celebritysketches 2 years ago
That's because he is correct.
bottleslingguy 2 years ago
I agree but for some reason it's just not registering on the radar that this is a huge discovery. It's an unknown to science which alone should be mega news... but it's not being treated like it is.
celebritysketches 2 years ago
Let's say they did make this mega news. How would that play out? It's a Pandora's box that would change everything instantly.I'd love to see it but there are very powerful forces in control who don't want to lose their control.Someone alluded to the Project Bluebeam false flag stunt being kicked off by the find of an archaeological relic which rewrites our known history and turns the world upside down.Maybe the technical software isn't ready and that's why it is taking so long to hit mainstream?
bottleslingguy 2 years ago
I have never been a 'believer' and listen interestedly with an open mind to what people say regarding the paranormal and the extraterrestrial, but remain sceptical until there is proof and evidence. Because I have seen so much rubbish ( mainly on youtube ) when you eventually see some credible science behind something associated with the 'rubbish' you almost get a slap in the face and have to wake yourself up. Lloyd hay need to do this to everyone if his work is to get recognition.
celebritysketches 2 years ago
yes because weve been so fine tuned from cradle to grave for years by these elite people who run the show.. like david icke says we police each other now on whats real or not.. the manipulators have done a good job on limiting the human brain on what it can perceive.. and its this sort of programming we need to delete from our minds and start to except that ther is extrodinary things happening.
Anubisrunner08 2 years ago
thanks for the uploads, this is the second set i've watched from the leeds exopolitics expo. remarkable that here we an ET skull and it's largely unknown to the world a decade after its discovery.
uranian23 2 years ago
Shame about the tank top.
If this bloke was in a leather jacket and ray bans it would be cool.
ccharlie100 2 years ago