Added: 3 years ago
From: LogicRespect
Views: 7,194
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (145)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nothing is sincere with the religious

    And that's why Shawniemaggot is back on the internets again acting like nothing happened.

    I knew that little fuckface wouldn't leave Youtube

  • A partial list of "missing link" diabolical frauds presented by Satanists posing as scientists to create an Evil Illusion:

    1913-53 Piltdown Man HOAX, Manufactured Planted Evidence

    Nebraska Man, Discarded Pigs Tooth. lol

    Peking Man, Conglomeration of Co-Mingled Fossils, lol

    Lucy, Manipulated Fossil Using Plaster, lol

    Orce Man, 4 Month Old Donkey Bone, lmao

    2009 Ida, Grossly Unsupportable Classification, lol

    2010 Sebida, equivelant of a deceased PetsMart Gerbil, roflmao

  • @waketheoblivious "Piltdown Man" Considering Piltdown Man contradicted evidence emerging on human evolution and ultimately was exposed by evolutionary anthropologists using legitimate transitional fossils and absolute dating methods it's not as wise a choice for creationists as they have been led to believe.

    "Nebraska Man" Discoverers of Nebraska Man were the most outraged at the media's treatment of it and those responsible for its correct identification (Which was still an extinct species)

  • @waketheoblivious "Peking Man, Conglomeration of Co-Mingled Fossils" Now that just simply isn't true, whatever source told you that is basically lying because there is no way that could be misunderstood. Peking man is also one of many (including 8 major independent finds) individual specimens of holotype, Homo Erectus.

    "Lucy, Manipulated Fossil Using Plaster" Again, this is simply untrue and besides, ther are around 130 known specimens of A. afarensis, Lucy is simply the most famous

  • @waketheoblivious "Orce Man, 4 Month Old Donkey Bone" Can you name anybody who ever attempted to use "Orce man" as an example of a transitional form? For that matter it was considered the oldest European human ancestor remains (it is still 1.8 million years old). Furthermore the identification is tenuous as to whether it is from a donkey or a human relative. Either way its significance is exaggerated by creationist dishonesty.

  • @waketheoblivious "Ida" Ida's classification is well established as an extinct prosimian. It lacks specializations of lemurs and retains traits that are still retained in monkeys making it a transitional form. It is no closer related to humans as modern lemurs however making it more of a missing link in the lemur line. But then why should humans get them all?

    As for A. sediba well...again you've been lied to. Nobody could honestly mistake a homonim for a rodent

  • @ProcInc

    For Evolution in 2009 to have again submitted another fossil as the missing link that was a grossly unsupportable classification, shows why evolutionists are the laughing stocks of science. They begin with a Piltdown Man Hoax, follow that up with a series of more diabolical manipulated fossils presented as the missing link, and are somehow surprised the integrity and credibility of science has suffered a fatal blow.

  • @waketheoblivious "a grossly unsupportable classification" what does this even mean? the scientific classification was always well supported. I think you are confusing the media's lack of expertise in attempting to report the find with the aspects that the scientists themselves were excited about. I suggest you read the original and sebsequent papers on Darwinius massilae to properly understand this before making things up.

    I've already answered Pildown man, once again you are 60 years behind

  • @ProcInc

    research, you lazy fucking Satanic Nazi. Mommy still wipe your ass for you? Instead of reading the responses a government training manual provides, how bout pulling your head our of your ass and do your own investigation. If you think government is not involved with conspiracies then you need to type Iran Contra into a Web Browser and pull your head out of your lazy Satanic Nazi Ass.

  • @waketheoblivious You're quite the hateful one aren't you? You don't seem to be all in with this discussion because after I requested you research the appropriate papers your only retort is a rude demand to "research" without any indication as to what it is that requires researching?

    If you are referring to my requests for sources I have indeed done the research and no research indicates the unjustifiable claims you are making

  • @ProcInc

    ClimateGate, the Global Warming Hoax that has had several well known scientists resign in professional disgrace for their role in manipulating the data. All validated by 1000's of emails traded amongst themselves to orchestrate the fraud.

  • @waketheoblivious incidentally, in your erroneous list you left out my own example KNM-ER 1470. Is it just an ape or just a human? which creationist was wrong? and how could they get it wrong if they claim these transitionals can be so easily partitioned into one group or the other?

    The fact they can't decide is a glaring testament to its transitional nature is it not?

    Also, you have yet to cite your claims regarding Peking man, (and why you left out the other H. Erecti), Lucy and A sediba

  • @waketheoblivious "ClimateGate, the Global Warming Hoax"

    The independent inquiry found no evidence of manipulated data and no charges of wrongdoing were found to be justified. On the other hand the so-called "climate sceptics" were found to have dishonestly taken various comments out of context. So this was a fraud of the climate change denialists, not the scientists

    "that has had several well known scientists resign in professional disgrace"

    Name. One.

  • @ProcInc

    Oh please, the data actually shows a slight cooling and Al Gore is facing over 60,000 pending lawsuits for his role in perpetrating the fraud. Once the media posterchild, Global Warming is now treated as a sexually transmitted disease with everyone denying they ever touched the subject.

  • @waketheoblivious "Al Gore is facing over 60,000 pending lawsuits" No he isn't. Even a quick search debunks this lie.

    I also asked you to name one scientist who resigned over "climategate", can't you name one? you said there were several. This is a direct challenge to your honesty.

  • @ProcInc

    Quick and half assed, that seems consistent with the depth of your intelligence. When you are asked to write a middle school paper, will the extent of your research be an encyclopedia?

  • @waketheoblivious It was a demonstrably false claim to make (60,000 lawsuits would require one a day for 164 years!). It is people like you who offer a quick window to demonstrate how incompetent your people's camp of belief is. Your statements are false, your accusations dishonourable and your language hateful.

    Your claims are separate from and inferior to those established by science and in the limited space I have been given I have provided sufficient evidence for that.

  • @ProcInc

    You demonstrated you are a lazy ass Satanic Nazi Shill incapable of researching anything past what is written in a government textbook or training manual. Equating evolution to science is absurd unless you believe science is in the business of manufacturing evidence to support theorys and sustain that Hoax with more diabolical fraud. Satanists posing as scientists to create an Evil Illusion is hardly the "irrefutable evidence" science adopted to distance itself from Mideival Sorcery

  • @waketheoblivious It seems as though you don't have a basic understanding of all subjects you feel the urge to touch upon. You have this strange charge of fraud in evolutionary theory fuelled by a 100 year old hoax of unknown culprit which was exposed by 'evolutionists' (Oakley, Weiner and Le Cros Clark) using legitimate transitional fossils (such as A africanus, discovered in 1922 by Raymond Dart) and chemical dating methods.

    Can you name a climatologist who resigned yet?

  • @ProcInc

    Independent inquiry?? OMG, your statement is so laughable you might get mistaken for trying to be a comedian. The emails traded between scientists, directors of scientific institutions and science departments gave explicit instruction on how to misinterpret the data to support the concept of a Global Warming trend. Even though the data demonstrated a slight cooling, it was deliberately manipulated to show warming. Those involved should have been charged with a crime against humanity

  • hnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

  • LOL RLY?

  • An apology does not heal scars. Send him to prison!

    A crime unpunished is as bad as a crime committed again!

  • you're a loser. congratulations to all the fat bastards who invest themselves in meaningless youtube drama.

  • If VFX had such an unshakable belief in God, why didn't he ask GOD to defend him in court?

  • @The8thDOCTOR Pray a million times, and God gives you a special helmet!

  • @MOPEDBRAD

    I hope that it's EPIC !

  • This Young man has more spine then 3/4ths of the people who write comments. Professing to believe in freedom of speech then denying it's use is hypocritical. Many are those who piss on the graves of the Patriots who died to provide that freedom. Research the world leaders and celebrities who have been trading the Satanic Salute for the past 40 years. "For the Leader/Prince of this world is coming and he has nothing in Me" Jesus Christ, some of His last words before returning to Heaven.

  • @waketheoblivious EVERY BODY IS LAUGHING AT YOU... You're such a moron. Do you make this shit up you're self>?

  • Your right there is not a missing link that has been discovered, there are now more than 30. This argument is as old as when Darwin presented his case and at the time it was legitimate. However now this argument has long been blown out of the water. See Dawkins missing link, and please stop referencing from 30 year old text books.

  • Generate a legitimate missing link or STFU.

  • What are you too lazy to type in the key words in google to find them? Or are you afraid that you'll be proven wrong? Or how about you pick up a scientific journal or a book. I'm telling you they exist I'm not holding your hand and explaining little details to people unless I'm getting paid. I do that all day 'cause people don't want to read, they just want to be told. So how about you show some effort and at least follow the link I hand fed you.

  • Evolution of mankind:

    One missing hominid.

    Christianity:

    Absolutely no proof whatsoever.

    And if you start citing the bible as "evidence", I will find you and pimp slap you like the little slut you are.

  • wikipedia List_of_transitional_fossils

  • @ray38montreal

    That is usually what gets submitted as the "missing link" but transitional fossils do not meet the criteria that was established when the original Hoax was created to satisfy "irrefutable evidence". Just use the definition of "missing link" that was used when the Hoax was used to bypass schoolboard objection to teaching this science fiction as fact.

  • @waketheoblivious Missing links are transitional fossils and they do meet the criteria that science puts on it not a criteria of creationist that will never acknowledge it regardless. I was not soliciting a response from you. You do not have the clarity of mind to respond intelligently. Your sens of reality is warped by religious zealotry and are quite delusional. Your living in a dream world Neo!

  • @ray38montreal "No matter how far back we go in the fossil record of previous animal life on earth, we find no trace of any animal forms which are intermediate between the major groups of phyla. Since we have not the slightest evidence, either among the living or the fossil animals, of any intergrading types following the major groups, it is a fair supposition that there never have been any such intergrading types."

    - Dr. Austin Clark

    No "missing link" = Evolution is Science Fiction

  • @waketheoblivious (Pakicetus) an early cetacean from characteristic features of the inner ear, found only in cetaceans: the large auditory bulla is formed from the ectotympanic bone only. This suggests that it is a transitional species between extinct land mammals and modern cetaceans. I gave you references to look up. It's all there. I cant hold you hand and teach you like a baby. If you are too lazy or stupid to learn for your self it's your problem. Your statement is completely false,

  • @waketheoblivious "Dr. Austin Clark"

    Dr Austin Clark; 1880-1954. This is how up-to-date creationists are.

    Nowadays the purported lack of transitionals forms is widely known as the "favourite lie" of creationists.

    Quoting somebody who lived before the modern synthesis is a testament to such dishonety.

  • @ProcInc <---- Satanic Nazi Shill, either generate a legitimate "missing link" or STFU

  • @waketheoblivious This is the kind of rhetorical path you go down when I demonstrate your dishonesty? Yet another testament to the hopelessness of creationism. I should point out also that 'Satanic' implies spite and malice, which is your forte not mine and Nazism requires antievolution and anti atheist sentiments (Consider the fate of Max Sievers).

    You know very well transitional fossils are well known and resplendent: take for example KNM-ER 1470. Creationists argue if its 'ape' or 'man'

  • @ProcInc

    The only thing you have demonstrated is you are an egotistical maniac and a pathological liar. Either generate a legitimate missing link or STFU you sick lying Satanic Nazi. An Evil Illusion that began with a diabolical Hoax, Piltdown Man presented as the "missing link". After removing the pictures several new diabolical frauds were presented to take his place and sustain science fiction. Satanic Nazi Shills promoting their Godforsaken lifestyle using an evil illusion.

  • @waketheoblivious I know you don't actually mean these hateful and grossly inaccurate comments. I think the best thing you can do is apologise for such comments. Can you back which comment of mine is enough to establish me as a 'pathological liar?' I will happily justify or reference any comment I made appropriately.

    Meanwhile, your charges are particularly ironic considering your silly mishmash of claims on legitimate homonim fossils. I only wish I wasn't limited for space

  • "Science moved from the realm of Witchcraft & Sorcery by adopting "irrefutable evidence"

    Are you mentally fucking retarded you piece of shit?

    Witchcraft (See: Wicca, a harmless religion), is a type of mysticism, you fucking cock end. I believe what you were referring to was alchemy, which is STILL not a recognized science and was, in fact, developed by the religious.

    So in conclusion, stop making shit up, and fuck you very much.

  • The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution. Stephen Jay Gould, Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging? Paleobiology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1980, p. 127.

  • Google "transitional fossils."

    I think you'll find there are many.

    PS, you're still a whiny little bitch.

  • Google, "Crock of Shit"

    You'll find it is a derivative of rationalizing and justifying lies to support an opinion that is founded on a theory that was introduced into text books based on a Hoax. To make up for the atrocity of presenting a manufactured fraud as science, evolution repeats that same performance by presenting "Lucy", another manipulated skeletal remains as the "missing link". Only thing missing are the ethics, integrity or credibility associated with evolution science/sorcery.

  • Oh look, another batshit christfag conspiracy nut.

    How adorable.

  • @waketheoblivious Ignorance can be remedied by education. Stupidity cannot for it is the unwillingness to investigate, learn or study the subject you are discussing.

  • @ray38montreal History of teaching Theory of Evolution:

    1.Proponents manufactured Piltdown Man

    2.Planted him as "irrefutable evidence"

    3.Labeled him the "missing link"

    4.Created the Illusion Evolution was scientific fact.

    5.Removed the pictures of the Hoax.

    6.Sustained the Hoax with a series of diabolical frauds presented as the "missing link".

    7.Feign Ignorance with Satanic Indignation in lieu of providing a legitimate "missing link".

    8.Rationalize & Justify fraud taught as fact

  • 1. He ceirtainly wasn't sincere apologising, he's clearly reading the whole thing from a paper or a screen. And if you detect any sincerity in his deliverance, I just have to wonder where.

    2. It didn't take courage to apologise, that's what decent people do, when they've been acting like a dick. Besides, he didn't really have a choice, except prosecution to the full extent to the law. He just tuck-tailed and ran.

  • nah... PCS was a coward and he was motivated not from a sense of guilt but a fear of prosicution. His recent post calling Thunderfoot to (yet again) debate him shows he has no shame. What a surprise.

  • funny thing about the whole venomfangx becomeing butthurt about others useing his videos to laugh at him, he forgets that use of copywrighted matieral for parody is perfectly legal

  • Not only that, but because post de facto laws and punishments are illegal in the US, Tfoot can not be punished for doing something that was legal at the time regardless of the legality of those actions now. This is the case with his use of PCS' videos(which was perfectly legal when he used them).

  • You have a right to make parody of anyone's videos, like this one. What you don't have a right to do is upload someone's videos verbatim.

    The only reason I have not had the many video infringements of my coyright taken down is because they provide another outlet for my videos! Some people get upset by others doing it. At this time I have no interest in forcing them to be removed.

    That could change any time i want it to.

  • yes you do i can take anyone of your vids, critique them and use the footage according to youtube itself and i quote again for the 3rd time

    "You also hereby grant each user of the YouTube Website a non-exclusive license to access your User Submissions through the Website" now plz actually read the term of use instead of scrolling past it.

  • YOuTube has no legal power to take copyright ownership away from the maker of the video, and puvlishing your videos on YT does not constitute a giving-away of one's copyrights!

    if you snap a shutter on a camera, you intantly own copyright to hte image on the film or sensor. How do I know? I am an ex=professional pgtographer who studied at the New York Institute of Photography. One of my courses was "Photography and the Law".

    Verbatim publication is unlawful copyright infringement.

  • Fair Use does not apply to vopying and publishing other people's videos without modifications that make the end product one that is clearly parody or commentary! Verbatim copying and publishing (uploading constitutes pblication - making them public) is a violation of international copyright law!

    This is why news programs can use portions of other people's work without penalty - because they are making commentary or parody of the work, not verbatim publishing it.

  • VewnomFangX's mistake was filing against someone who made commentary or parody of his work. Had they not, he would have been completely within his rights.

  • To disprove the existance of God, one would have to, at the very least, prove that it is possible for there to be an infinite number of causes. The existance of a First Cause destroys all hope of atheist's attempts to do so. You see, if there was not a First Cause, time would not exist. The First Cause is therefore Personal for having chosen to create instead of allowing nothingness to continue uninteruppted.

    Sorry. Atheism is denialism based ignorance. Nothing more.

  • its impossible to prove whether god exists or not since there is absolutly no evidence for or against its existance.

    PS your a censoring jerckoff.

  • DNA proves the existance of a supernatural designer by itself. It is empirical evidence in fact, because it uses algorithms to store and retrive information. Both algorithms and information are products of intelligence only.

    When they discovered the genetic material in 1952, they proved the existance of God on the spot.

  • no your just touting bullshit, just b/c thing are complicated it doesnt mean its a product of IDiotism.

  • turns out it only takes cowardice to do what he did, and his appology was anything but sincere.

  • GJ, you pawned a 17 year old.

  • I don't think it is sincere. I think he is just terrified that he might ACTUALLY get in trouble. Just like most theists, he NEEDS a threat of punishment to be a good boy.

  • those who chose sciences over god get many of the great things a modern 1st world society gets and those who follow you or PCS are hypocrites and douchebags. religion in itself isnt bad but fundementalism is a vile disease in which you and PCS try to spread around the internet you evil, vile, immature, little pice of filth. your and PCS are a disgrace to our society you little hypocrite, you little leach. you sir are truly and evil vile little creature. your a monster a bigoted narcissist.

  • blah bla blha, yada yada yah, like I really care...

  • So you are basically a coward, praying to avoid hell.

    Well, if i die and there is a God, ill admit im wrong, and go to heaven anyway, but have a much better time while alive. so..... screw you :)

  • Like I said, cowerdis.

    btw.... it isnt real. sorry.

  • oh no

    dont break nephilimfree's dream

    how can you let a kid crying running to his mother?

    besides

    you are going to ""hell"" for doing that you know

    rofl

  • wow sounds like you read that out of harry poter

  • No here's what happens

    Christ comes down

    The army shoots him

    I laugh

    the end

  • Sure. God creates the univers and dies from a bullet when he comes to the world to take control of it. Genius.

  • I know isn't it. And there's a difference between christ and god retard

  • Jesus Christ is God Himself. Scripture makes this clear many, many times from Genesis all the way through all of the books of the bible to Revelations.

    Not knowing is ignorance. Unwillingness to learn is willful ignorance. The Word of God tells us about that too.

  • God is the alpha and the omega

    worship him, to be converted watch my videos

    God Bless, See you all in church

  • Jesus Christ is God. The Word of God tells us so over and over. Jesus Christ Himself told us so.

    Knowledge kills ignorance dear boy.

  • There's a difference between Christ and God you stupid douche.

  • unfortunatly for nephy your a retarded deluded asshole with no credible backing. it was so very pleasent to see you destroyed by FSAtheFirst.

  • They are one and the same. But then, you've been hearing Christians say that all of your life. Genius.

  • No. I haven't. I don't go to church. And I catually deal with my problems instead of trusting some imaginary bitch in the sky to take care of them. I go out and solve them. Unlike you.

  • hahaha what you said made my day.

  • The Bible speaks of a talking donkey. Cool eh?

  • I still want a stripped cow. That would be fucking awesome.

  • Saying random bible quotes won't change the fact that your believing in a delusion, a myth, a fairytale written by mortal men thousands of years ago. You act as though no ones ever read the bible or heard some stupid morale from it, WE ALL HAVE, repeating them doesn't make your religion any less of a myth.

  • beautiful... nice

  • So your saying that I hate nothing? that makes a lor of sense, If i know God doesn't exist why would I hate it? I hate the fact that people alow themselves to get brainwashed into thinking a space alien created everything, watches us, send us to hell, etc.

  • I don't hate god, its just that, there is no god to hate.

  • ha

    u are crazy too. btw i really like sex and i have a really hard time believing it is wrong, because it isnt wrong. God is just a jealous virgin, who went through high school with pimples on his face and everyone mocked him. That to me... explains why he hates most people who like to have fun

  • "Immature huh? Have u seen vfx's joker impersonation?"

    Because there are two boxes does not make one of them a sphere.

    "You just smacked yourself in the face there didn't you?"

    See the above.

    "Why do you defend a misguided little prick like vfx?"

    Because he speaks the truth.

    "Filing a DMCA because he felt bullied is very immature. Epic fails all around."

    Because there are two boxes does not make one of them a sphere.

  • Sorry NephilimFree

    You've seen this video, and you basically fucked yourself with your half-baked response(s)

    As Raven would put it, epic fails all around!

  • Actually, there was no courage required to do what he did, in fact, his actions were based in cowardice.

  • @nephilimfree

    Immature huh? Have u seen vfx's joker impersonation? You just smacked yourself in the face there didn't you? Why do you defend a misguided little prick like vfx? Filing a DMCA because he felt bullied is very immature. Epic fails all around.

  • Amen to that xD

  • u are right its like being 16 and one of ur girl mates goes up to u and says tht ur being mean to her ,and him going to his mom and dad litterally crying saying tht she is sexually intimidating him and accusing him of rape

  • what do you give a shit about a nerd fight!

  • Yes, the day you express intellect will certainly be the day you visit a "PHY"cologist. Funny thing is, neither the former nor the latter exist.

  • lol tht is rather true =D

  • -"Thunderf00t is prticularly immature, distasteful, and stinky, making vids of people by distorting their faces"-

    That's wher you're wrong, Thunderf00t uses something you creationist slime do not, FACTS. VenomFangX said that evolutionists like things that are evil vile and wicked, kinda immature?

  • You said Thunderf00t is immature? Distasteful?! STINKY!?!? He needs to grow up???......... ARE YOU ILL!?!?!?! DO YOU HAVE SOMEONE MIXED UP WITH THUNDER?! WHAT THE FUCK!!!

  • replace thunderf00t with PCS and you. you 2 are the 2 biggest douchebags on the internet.

  • PCS was commiting purgery. whether or not it was him or a "friend" he is responsible for the false DMCA's. PCS could have been serving serious jail time.

  • 2 problems

    1- when you upload a video onto youtube any other user is allowed to use content from that video, see terms of use.

    2- his videos fall under fair use. Tf00t is obiously not making a profit and is making vids strictly for educational purpouses.

  • But they are not allowed to post the video verbatim without interjections of commentary that make parody or commentary of it. That is a breech of copyright law. There are quite a few copyright infringements of my wrok on YT, and i've had a few removed just to show the account owner that I have the power to have them removed. For the most part, i don't because they are only provideing me another outlet for my work, and people don't fall for sock accounts anyway.

  • under YT's terms of use artical 6 section C "You also hereby grant each user of the YouTube Website a non-exclusive license to access your User Submissions through the Website"

    also the said videos fall under fair use since they are strictly for no-profit educational use.

  • Nothing in YT's policies that states anyone can copy another user's videos verbatim. Doing so is a copyright violation, and YT supports it by complying with the reqquest to remove them.

    Allowing acces is not copying and publishing. non-profit or not, videos uploaded to YT are copyright owned by thier maker. It's the law.

  • just read the terms of use rather than denying it. by posting videos here you grant every YT user a non exclusive access to your material and his vids fall under fair use.

  • The terms of use do not and cannot take away a person's copyright. Once more, copyright is not removed by fair use. Fair use is what? FAIR USE. Not ownership, nor the right to publish verbatim.

    Go read about copyright and media and learn a thing or two.

  • nephy nephy nephy you illiterate deluded bastard YT's terms of use even says and i quote artical 6 section C

    "You also hereby grant each user of the YouTube Website a non-exclusive license to access your User Submissions through the Website"

    learn to read and stop censoring people for being smarter than you. is it me or are all creationists these vile scumbags?

  • even if it was copyrighted the videos fall under fair use

    also how come you censor anyone with a dissenting opinion?

  • Not only to access, but to "use, REPRODUCE, DISTRIBUTE, prepare derivative works of, DISPLAY and perform such User Submissions."

    You don't need to own the copyright to something to use it.

  • When someone uploads a video toy youtube they agree to the statement I just quoted, meaning they are allowing other users of the website to "use, REPRODUCE, DISTRIBUTE," etc etc their work.

    "Stupidsism is inherited they say."

    Yeah, it's called evolution.

  • i feel sry for his(shawn) family, his friends, and if he ever has any children (plz dnt)

  • wow so much hate from a christian...theres a first... :p

  • you make the videos and post them here you grant all YT users a non exclusive right to access videos so censoring douchebags like you cant censor free speech and they also fall under fair use.

  • Indeed, Thunderf00t makes the greatest videos on youtube.

  • The apology was written by Thunderfoot's lawyer.

    VFX had no option but to read out the statement or he would have faced legal proceedings.

  • Bullshit. He had the option of standing up for what he considered his rights in court. Which he beat his chest about. Or he could have simply left YouTube for a year.

  • Do you really think VFX would leave for a year or attempt to pursue things through the court?

    VFX is one of the most dishonest people on this Web site, he is also spineless.

  • @DefaultPosition: Well he did have a choice of either reading this or going to court over it with TF claiming VFX is guilty of purjury and VFX counterclaiming that TF is guilty of Blackmail.

  • Wow Venom looks like a fucking lunatic... scary.

  • VenomFangX is an antichrist. That's right. An antichrist because he so vehemently opposes the beautiful and wonderous manner in which God chose to create the universe as well as willfully opposing knowledge (a gift from God) and openly repeating incorrect information to which he has already been corrected on lying.

    VenomFangX also said at one point he was leaving, but quickly returned. It was a cry for attention.

  • I thank you for putting up this video, but I KNOW you do NOT know much about VFX/PCS. He is one of the most manipulative backstabbers I have ever seen on youtube. I refuse to forgive him, but then we haven't seen the true terms of settlement yet. Stay tuned!!!

  • I was trying to comment on a video by VenomfangX and he puts a 'pending approval' thing on it....only a person afraid to hear something he might not like would do that.

  • I would agree. It is a victory and a triumphant one at that. He got owned and Thunderfoot was quite magnanimous in victry as well. It is a shame I cant say the same about Shaun (VF) in defeat. Oh well. It wasn't expected anyways.

  • RIIIIIGHT.

    face it dude... your "god" doesnt exist

  • I think he has "dropped" the issue enough. I think that this was the best possible resolution.  I also think, for the sake of building some level of yet unrealized character in VFX, he should be made to read the formal apology

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more