Rio de janeiro. I´m not yankee, but admirer of the space explorations. I ask for like this the all citizens of the it USA that they help to save James Webb of the cuts of budget of his Congress. Hear the video below. Help to save the humanity's eyes. And spread for his/her compatriots.
Save the James Webb Space Telescope/ watch?v=aZGE86qBxCI&feature=related
@VenousTadpole no they keep saying they found one then they say its a ring of dust that might be a planet someday or its a double star its a lot of hype
@suranjangupta22 it will launch in 2013 we are gonna get a new human help and push the distant of what whe can see with our helper observatories and the naked eye
@KalimaShaktide there are actual pieces of shit floating in outer space the dark matter of the universe that will stop the expansion of the universe and cause it too contract to the point of the original big bang the same pieces of shit that floated into diana nyads mouth when she swam around manhattan
@ultrazeen380 planets observed are all in our galaxy, catching a planets in another galaxies is still impossible, anyway the are all 10 ly or more so yes we d take some time going there lol
@evgtun see the bang has to happen at wat is now the center of our universe...and since the explosion would have expanded radially outwards we just have to looks for its "echo" then move towards that direction where the echo is weaker because the part where the bang occured will be the part which has had maximum time for dampening of the echo....
In around 5:17 they mention that gas giants are being found in orbits close to the star. I can' belive this true, it's a lack of resolution. Any star is going to blow off gas from the nearest planets and leave the outer plants as gas giants much like our solar system.
Its lots bigger than huble and it sees infared so it can see through all the gas that got in the way of hubble. it's deep field will see far more distant galaxes.
15 or 20 years more with a telescope with the power of 5 hubbles, ok worse is nothing. The hubble paid its cost (30 years) till it became a obstacle to create new telescopes. This James Webb can't be that time in the space.
and then they will find another big bang.. and then they will find billions of big bangs.. and then they will start the theory of super big bang.. and then theyll find another super big bang.. and then some billions more of those.. and then the super duper big bang.. and then the.. gosh. i hope there's a wall so those scientists can go and do something useful with our money.
and then they will find another big bang.. and then they will find billions of big bangs.. and then they will start the theory of super big bang.. and then theyll find another super big bang.. and then some billions more of those.. and then the super duper big bang.. and then the.. gosh. i hope there's a wall so those scientists can go and do something useful with our money.
the webb telescope is only 5 times the hubble , that is not good enough,
we need the webb to be 15 times the power of hubble to see far enough to find out what started this ,
why are the goverments not doing this, !!!!!!!! we need to know, what is past the observible universe, this is the solution to knowing to what is beyong the emptyness that envelopes us!!!!!!.
@onekeypianoplayer While most of us agree, money is a key issue. As the saying goes, "No bucks, no Buck Rogers". Also, having the ability (launcher capable of getting several tons of payload 1 million miles from Earth) to upgrade JWST would be helpful too.
@spacevidcast Then we need to forget about the fake money system and start creating real solutions and finding real answers, These phony constraints protect those that print our money and enslave us with it. Get past the money and humanity will achieve in 10 years what will take 200 years to achieve in a monetary system.
@onekeypianoplayer we dont need to know... its pretty much irrelevant...by the time we make any significant progress in space the human race will have destroyed itself...it would be much better to put 6 billion dollars towards sustaining life on earth instead of wasting it on this
@onekeypianoplayer Our government spends multi trillion dollars on our military so we can fight petty wars against other nations on our own planet. That even better telescope you are vouching for would likely cost less than one percent as much as this stupid middle east war.
@onekeypianoplayer bigger dosent mean it looks further 6 billion it will cost thats the best gagets that dont need fine tuneing every few months money can buy durability self repairing parts its as good as it can be for now
I feel the same. I don't feel so bad knowing the check is going to benefit all "all of mankind". But the problem is, this is less than 1 tenth of 1 percent of our national budget. Our government has no problem spending money on killing people and giving it away to nations that hate us. Also, keeping dead people alive (medicare) and free-bees to lazy people that don't want to work. It makes me sick to pay my taxes because of what its spent on. Over $150K last year.
I cant wait for this telescope to get sent into space. I love the fact that we will be able to see objects in space in greater detail, but it is so disapointing that we will not be alive to see what lies beyond our observable universe
Not to ruin the party and all of the excitement but...
0:40 ONLY INFRARED? No visible light spectrum like the Hubble? D= So where only going to see the images in infrared no real color? Like the Hubble was famed for? I'm still going to miss Hubble if it gets decommissioned...
We're finding Jupiter sized planets in Mercury sized orbits not "in part because they are the easiest for us to find" but because they are *the only thing* that we could possibly have found with our pre-Kepler strategies. And are still the only thing we could expect to see at this time, even with Kepler. As time goes on, that will change, and the Kepler team will be able to confirm longer period, and smaller, planets.
@sbergman27 : ... Although I did not mean to imply that even Kepler could find a Jupiter in a Jupiter sized orbit in less than 35 years. And it doesn't have enough expendables on board for that.
@thrasher1100 : The last launch I was really excited about was OCO... which ended up at the bottom of the Indian Ocean near Antarctica, thanks to the dunderheads at Orbital Sciences Corp and their chewing gum and bailing wire, 25% failure rate, Taurus rocket.
Right now, the thought of the launch of something as important as JWST makes me so nervous I can hardly stand it. So I try not to think about it. Ariane 5 has a 92% to 96% success ratio. But still...
There's a mountain of evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
People who still think they went to the moon simply haven't seen the hoax evidence yet.
With the Webb telescope scientists speculate we will be able to see extrasolar planets, such as any planets that exist in the Alpha Centauri system at great detail
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
the webb space telescope is a remarkable feat of human engineering. so was the hubble. i only hope that engineers who do the real work can make observations as to what they see as well as mankind rather than astronomers who know nothing about the universe with their "big bang" and everything is "billions of years" old with absolutely 0 proof.
I predict that by at least the year 3000, (that is, if we made the successful leap from a type 0 civilization to a type 1) we'll be able to "engineer" our own planets. Just from what I've seen in recent technology.
thats awesum but it wud cost too much money. i mean they worked out how much it would cost to build the death star, it wud cost 15septillion. theres million, billion,trillion,quadrillion,quintillion, sextillion then septillion. and the numbers get bigger by the way. but anyway im sure things will b different in the year 3000.lol
Normally I would expect an immediate malfunction in space machines and vehicles, but since we are coming to an age of precision and detail, it is hard to imagine that things will go wrong. This telescope looks very aesthetic and advanced, and will be some sort of a replacement for the (almost) 20-year-old Hubble. Scientists and engineers must have known what to include in the JWST and how to include it. So, hopefully, this thing will help us make history and understand our universe better.
Great video. Thanks for posting. I wonder if they will be able to detect spectrographic signs of life.
Let me be the first (am I?) to predict that they will not see the "early" galaxies from after the Big Bang that they are expecting, but will push back the alleged age of the Universe, and conveniently force-fit the Big Bang to the new data.
yeah but L2 is way to far out for any easy servicing mission. we'll need to get it perfect first time because the only way we could get out there is via orion
some sweet info here
alexasmithy 4 days ago
i enjoyed this vid
msjessypp 5 days ago
Rio de janeiro. I´m not yankee, but admirer of the space explorations. I ask for like this the all citizens of the it USA that they help to save James Webb of the cuts of budget of his Congress. Hear the video below. Help to save the humanity's eyes. And spread for his/her compatriots.
Save the James Webb Space Telescope/ watch?v=aZGE86qBxCI&feature=related
aczjbr 3 months ago
Comment removed
aczjbr 3 months ago
THE NARRATOR IS FULL OF SHIT WHEN HE SAYS THERE ARE BILLIONS OF PLANETS IN OUR GALAXY NONE HAVE BEEN DETECTED OUTSIDE OUR OWN SOLAR SYSTEM
spacepatrolman 5 months ago
@spacepatrolman Incorrect. Planets have been detected. Plenty of them.
VenousTadpole 3 months ago
@VenousTadpole no they keep saying they found one then they say its a ring of dust that might be a planet someday or its a double star its a lot of hype
spacepatrolman 3 months ago
I fucking hate religion, without it this would have been up 1000 years ago.
BigVern771 5 months ago
2018 launch date. I bet it will be delayed, but I can't wait till it launches!
Haseeebo 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Congress wants to pass a bill that will terminate funding for the James Webb Space Telescope.
facebook(dot)com/SaveJWST
This project costs less money than we spend on wars per week.
stickerbrush827 6 months ago
Please, I Must Know Who Made This Music.?!? The Music In The Beginning.
ShadowCloud143 10 months ago
Why they can't launch it today..
iPlayWithPhysics 10 months ago
We won't be able to see the big bang with Webb D:
4FunPlayin 10 months ago 2
I am just curious as to how it will avoid dents made by micro meteorites .
KalimaShaktide 11 months ago
@KalimaShaktide The same way the rest of them do. Hope and some MMOD shielding.
spacevidcast 11 months ago
@KalimaShaktide when will it b launched...??
suranjangupta22 8 months ago
@suranjangupta22 it will launch in 2013 we are gonna get a new human help and push the distant of what whe can see with our helper observatories and the naked eye
jack342able 4 months ago
@KalimaShaktide there are actual pieces of shit floating in outer space the dark matter of the universe that will stop the expansion of the universe and cause it too contract to the point of the original big bang the same pieces of shit that floated into diana nyads mouth when she swam around manhattan
spacepatrolman 5 months ago
also if we say found a life supporting planet by the time we got to it it wud probly be occupied lol
ultrazeen380 11 months ago
@ultrazeen380 planets observed are all in our galaxy, catching a planets in another galaxies is still impossible, anyway the are all 10 ly or more so yes we d take some time going there lol
T4l0nITA 9 months ago
JWST = Jesus Would Slap Titties
optical76 11 months ago
to design a space telescope 15 power the hubble would take about 20 years
Nathan42279 1 year ago
dont you just love the people that plan this......and make this...and do this...these are people who are truly leaders in my eyes.
crowman131 1 year ago
how ta hell do they know in which direction the big bang happened? they need to point the telescope where the big bang happened right?
evgtun 1 year ago
@evgtun see the bang has to happen at wat is now the center of our universe...and since the explosion would have expanded radially outwards we just have to looks for its "echo" then move towards that direction where the echo is weaker because the part where the bang occured will be the part which has had maximum time for dampening of the echo....
vborg101 9 months ago
HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE FOREVER
juanello0 1 year ago
Replace the wars and hack jobs with Space exploration and telescopes.
unseenxxx 1 year ago
In around 5:17 they mention that gas giants are being found in orbits close to the star. I can' belive this true, it's a lack of resolution. Any star is going to blow off gas from the nearest planets and leave the outer plants as gas giants much like our solar system.
Ionizap 1 year ago
Its lots bigger than huble and it sees infared so it can see through all the gas that got in the way of hubble. it's deep field will see far more distant galaxes.
NielsShoe 1 year ago
Has anyone seen the large comet draining the south atlantic in the last few minutes?
MrBYBG 1 year ago
Two visitors are Star Wars fans...
Dennis1705 1 year ago
15 or 20 years more with a telescope with the power of 5 hubbles, ok worse is nothing. The hubble paid its cost (30 years) till it became a obstacle to create new telescopes. This James Webb can't be that time in the space.
AZURA888 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and then they will find another big bang.. and then they will find billions of big bangs.. and then they will start the theory of super big bang.. and then theyll find another super big bang.. and then some billions more of those.. and then the super duper big bang.. and then the.. gosh. i hope there's a wall so those scientists can go and do something useful with our money.
dziis6s 1 year ago
and then they will find another big bang.. and then they will find billions of big bangs.. and then they will start the theory of super big bang.. and then theyll find another super big bang.. and then some billions more of those.. and then the super duper big bang.. and then the.. gosh. i hope there's a wall so those scientists can go and do something useful with our money.
dziis6s 1 year ago
the webb telescope is only 5 times the hubble , that is not good enough,
we need the webb to be 15 times the power of hubble to see far enough to find out what started this ,
why are the goverments not doing this, !!!!!!!! we need to know, what is past the observible universe, this is the solution to knowing to what is beyong the emptyness that envelopes us!!!!!!.
onekeypianoplayer 1 year ago
@onekeypianoplayer While most of us agree, money is a key issue. As the saying goes, "No bucks, no Buck Rogers". Also, having the ability (launcher capable of getting several tons of payload 1 million miles from Earth) to upgrade JWST would be helpful too.
spacevidcast 1 year ago
@spacevidcast Then we need to forget about the fake money system and start creating real solutions and finding real answers, These phony constraints protect those that print our money and enslave us with it. Get past the money and humanity will achieve in 10 years what will take 200 years to achieve in a monetary system.
danz177 1 year ago
@onekeypianoplayer Theses things are done in stages and something 15 times the size of hubble has never been put in orbit before.
Plus the Webb telescope is meant to look for planets not out past the observable universe.
It's simply not designed for what you want it to do,It's a planet hunter.
jimmywrangles 1 year ago
@onekeypianoplayer I say screw money just do it haha
ClanFutureTools 1 year ago 2
@onekeypianoplayer we dont need to know... its pretty much irrelevant...by the time we make any significant progress in space the human race will have destroyed itself...it would be much better to put 6 billion dollars towards sustaining life on earth instead of wasting it on this
bronze5420 11 months ago
@onekeypianoplayer Our government spends multi trillion dollars on our military so we can fight petty wars against other nations on our own planet. That even better telescope you are vouching for would likely cost less than one percent as much as this stupid middle east war.
Zurround100 11 months ago
@onekeypianoplayer bigger dosent mean it looks further 6 billion it will cost thats the best gagets that dont need fine tuneing every few months money can buy durability self repairing parts its as good as it can be for now
ultrazeen380 11 months ago
@onekeypianoplayer how the fuck would you know you dont know shit
fdr100100 7 months ago
this is off the hook...no problem with my taxes going up for this stuff.
jhof989620 1 year ago 20
@jhof989620 Tell your congressman! Please! :D
spacevidcast 1 year ago 6
@spacevidcast How will JWST stay in Earth orbit 1.5 million away from Earth? Is gravity that far away from earth.
kobie8819591 10 months ago
@jhof989620 :
I feel the same. I don't feel so bad knowing the check is going to benefit all "all of mankind". But the problem is, this is less than 1 tenth of 1 percent of our national budget. Our government has no problem spending money on killing people and giving it away to nations that hate us. Also, keeping dead people alive (medicare) and free-bees to lazy people that don't want to work. It makes me sick to pay my taxes because of what its spent on. Over $150K last year.
dcb1138 1 year ago
This is good news. I was going to replace the Hubble Space Telescope myself, but I'm too busy at work right now.
psb1964 1 year ago
@psb1964 My thoughts exactly, Plus I lost my ladder so someone else will have to do it.
jimmywrangles 1 year ago
Hubble Space Telescope's
Collecting area = 4.5 m2 (48 sq ft)
James Webb Space Telescope
Collecting area = 25 m2 (270 sq ft)
The James Webb Space Telescope's mirror is huge in comparison to Hubble. I expect very very high res images!
InSaneTK 1 year ago
Well, I wonder... - no money...
blecha74 1 year ago
I cant wait for this telescope to get sent into space. I love the fact that we will be able to see objects in space in greater detail, but it is so disapointing that we will not be alive to see what lies beyond our observable universe
DJP2023 1 year ago
Bonanza!!!
Ladiestreat 1 year ago
I have to type up a research paper related to astronomy, I'm so writing down everything in this video word-for-word. Thanks!
donutmaster 1 year ago
thank you 4 the video :)
pony857 1 year ago
Not to ruin the party and all of the excitement but...
0:40 ONLY INFRARED? No visible light spectrum like the Hubble? D= So where only going to see the images in infrared no real color? Like the Hubble was famed for? I'm still going to miss Hubble if it gets decommissioned...
EpicPhysichs 1 year ago
@EpicPhysichs you will find that it will computer generate images in visible wavelength as they have been doing for many many years already
DieselDownunder 1 year ago
Thanks for these pleasant 9 min and 56 sec, I love astronomy.
Eduardunk 1 year ago 7
@Eduardunk love it to...can't wait:)
pony857 1 year ago
We're finding Jupiter sized planets in Mercury sized orbits not "in part because they are the easiest for us to find" but because they are *the only thing* that we could possibly have found with our pre-Kepler strategies. And are still the only thing we could expect to see at this time, even with Kepler. As time goes on, that will change, and the Kepler team will be able to confirm longer period, and smaller, planets.
sbergman27 2 years ago
@sbergman27 : ... Although I did not mean to imply that even Kepler could find a Jupiter in a Jupiter sized orbit in less than 35 years. And it doesn't have enough expendables on board for that.
sbergman27 2 years ago
At least we will learn how many aliens in space in 2014 :)))
kaptugan 2 years ago
darn 2013 that sucks hopefully hubble doesnt blow up any time soon
thrasher1100 2 years ago
@thrasher1100 : The last launch I was really excited about was OCO... which ended up at the bottom of the Indian Ocean near Antarctica, thanks to the dunderheads at Orbital Sciences Corp and their chewing gum and bailing wire, 25% failure rate, Taurus rocket.
Right now, the thought of the launch of something as important as JWST makes me so nervous I can hardly stand it. So I try not to think about it. Ariane 5 has a 92% to 96% success ratio. But still...
sbergman27 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is off-topic but it's space-related.
There's a mountain of evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked. I posted a partial summary of it on a science forum. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th post from the top.
People who still think they went to the moon simply haven't seen the hoax evidence yet.
Cosmored 2 years ago
Sooooo exciting!!
NasaGirl100 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
NasaGirl100 2 years ago
wow! i just cant wait to the first pictures!!!
saharSA1 2 years ago 2
signed :) very informative 5/5 :)
razorbladar 2 years ago
Comment removed
andyx1205 2 years ago 2
WoW can't wait to see its first images:)
SenemmTSR 2 years ago
exciting stuff here!
ScienceLayman 2 years ago
With the Webb telescope scientists speculate we will be able to see extrasolar planets, such as any planets that exist in the Alpha Centauri system at great detail
Robotdrummerzzk 2 years ago
would it be possible to build a telescope that sees so far back into space that we can see the big bang? or at least the immediate aftermath of it
unitedfc99 2 years ago 2
We will miss you Hubble. You will always represent space telescopes to us!
Airclot 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the webb space telescope is a remarkable feat of human engineering. so was the hubble. i only hope that engineers who do the real work can make observations as to what they see as well as mankind rather than astronomers who know nothing about the universe with their "big bang" and everything is "billions of years" old with absolutely 0 proof.
HomeIncomeBusiness 2 years ago
You are a ignorant asswipe unworthy of the space you take up on Earth.
Mungaman97 2 years ago
you are a worthless douche bag and a waste of sperm
HomeIncomeBusiness 2 years ago
You're a little bitch if you seriously meant that because of a youtube comment.
TheOriginalOwnage 2 years ago
wonder if NASA will but a fixed telescope on the moon ?
BIGFACE08 2 years ago
Funny how it comes out in 2013, when all these doomsday theorists are saying the world ends late 2012. Lets hope they're not right xD
JoeyMontanaMang 2 years ago
I predict that by at least the year 3000, (that is, if we made the successful leap from a type 0 civilization to a type 1) we'll be able to "engineer" our own planets. Just from what I've seen in recent technology.
JoeyMontanaMang 2 years ago
thats awesum but it wud cost too much money. i mean they worked out how much it would cost to build the death star, it wud cost 15septillion. theres million, billion,trillion,quadrillion,quintillion, sextillion then septillion. and the numbers get bigger by the way. but anyway im sure things will b different in the year 3000.lol
glennandsofia 2 years ago
@JoeyMontanaMang Fuck the Kardashev scale it's theoretical and speculative. also your predictions are based on nothing.
666j1 2 years ago
Excellent video.
StereoSpace 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨ post to 3 other vids
¨°º¤ø„¸ Copy „ø¤º°¨ press F5 twice
¸„ø¤º°¨Paste ``°º¤ø„¸ OK
¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º look at ur backgroud
dev123420 2 years ago
Normally I would expect an immediate malfunction in space machines and vehicles, but since we are coming to an age of precision and detail, it is hard to imagine that things will go wrong. This telescope looks very aesthetic and advanced, and will be some sort of a replacement for the (almost) 20-year-old Hubble. Scientists and engineers must have known what to include in the JWST and how to include it. So, hopefully, this thing will help us make history and understand our universe better.
arphynon 2 years ago
when is this scope gonna go up?
TyteTyson 2 years ago
2013
siener 2 years ago 3
and how long will it take to cool down after launch?
MAMOHT82 2 years ago
Great video. Thanks for posting. I wonder if they will be able to detect spectrographic signs of life.
Let me be the first (am I?) to predict that they will not see the "early" galaxies from after the Big Bang that they are expecting, but will push back the alleged age of the Universe, and conveniently force-fit the Big Bang to the new data.
miniplus 3 years ago
just so oyu know L2 is lagrange point 2
lagrange points are areas of neutral gravity (between too masses like earth and moon or sun and earth)
CCPnoob 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i have an ET beside me from the andromeda galaxy..578901 light years away from earth.."it" said human scientist are lame alien hunters..
headbanger940 3 years ago
very cool project
tsjoencinema 3 years ago 2
Can't wait for this baby to go into orbit.
NakSsS 3 years ago 41
@NakSsS agreed xD
Sylvanas17 10 months ago
@NakSsS Only 3-4 years left!
4FunPlayin 10 months ago
Great! Thanks for posting this!
stephenetienne 3 years ago 5
odd looking telescope, but cool stuff
gramatikov 3 years ago 10
Who's going to be seeing it? The important thing is that it will work well.
Jmcenanly 3 years ago 6
yeah but L2 is way to far out for any easy servicing mission. we'll need to get it perfect first time because the only way we could get out there is via orion
themanwithacrumpet 3 years ago 3
It's a NASA/ESA/CSA project and will be launched by the european Ariane 5.
U5K0 3 years ago