@drone713 electrons in pairs at the shell level when caused to 'eject' from the atom as a result of a burst of energy (photons) always manifest oppositie spins and will maintain that opposite even when moving apart at space-time velocities ;if a Stern-Gerlach device is utilized to alter the spin of one, the other will change it's spin as well so as to remain in opposite spin !
@JamesJTraitz Nope, wrong again. The other will NOT " it's spin to remain in opposite spin." That's the whole basis of your ridiculous theory that electrons are conscious and aware, and andrewbreen completely disproved you. I don't see how you could maintain that you were never disproved when andrewbreen's TRUE statement completely contradicts the basis of your argument for living energy.
@drone713 By the way what you have termed "your ridiculous theory" is Einstein's theory not mine; then again , uninformed and underread individuals make the kind of statements you ,in your ignorance, make...BTW...try familiarizing yourself with Dirac's equation and with QED- Quantum Electro Dynamics...learn how electrons going forward in time become positrons (anti-matter electrons) traveling bacwards in time !
@drone713 Have you actually read or studied?! Einstein,Podolsky and Rosen demonstrated that an ejected pair of electrons will continue to correlate their respective spins even at space-time distances suggesting that ,either the electrons communicate with each other or space,itself, does not exist! i.e. seperation is an illusion.
@JamesJTraitz Okay so you admit that the reason the electrons change spin simultaneously is because space is an illusion. Okay? Okay. Wait a second....in your video, "these electrons change spin simultaneously because they are aware." .......................DO YOU SEE WHAT I'M GETTING AT?
@drone713 It's either/or...as one electron's spin is altered by the Stern-Gerlach device it's 'twin' also changes it's own spin (up ,down ,left or right ) to remain opposite. How did it 'know' that the other electron's spin had changed ? Either, they communicate their spins or they are not truly separated! Kind of supports physicist David Bohm's cocept that the apparent separate parts of the universe are intimately connected that " at a deep and fundamental level is an unbroken wholeness"
Actually, they are not two separate electrons, they only appear to us as such in our limited dimensions. When you see the electron pair and spin one electron, the "second" electron is merely the same electron from a different view (the connection between the two views occurs in a higher dimension). This explain the instantaneous reaction, they are one and the same electron.
Space is the illusion we create out of fear. It is a manifestation of the need to see ourselves as separate. Letting go of this belief, we would treat the universe with the respect we would treat our own self.
@watchmylips lol dude, to say there is no space means to disagree with einestien himself. he proved through mathimatics (and has been proven over and over with experiements)that space and time exist and are one in the same, same goes with energy and matter..if you come up with some equations to back up your theory, ill start taking you seriously lol, untill then you are just talking out of your ass and disregarding the believe of ev
Based on that experiment and the possible explanations of that experiment, the implications of how scientists, priests, bellhops and Burger flippers view the universe must be drastically altered and provoke a massive shift in conscious awareness creating huge debate about our universe on a mass scale. Now, Why is this information being held back, purposely suppressed and kept out of main stream thought?
The stuff is alive and intelligent on a sub atomic, sub nuclear level and beyond.
Not entirely - enough to presume to know Einstein would not have said anything like "either electrons are living, aware, energy in telepathic communication with each other or space dose not exist"
What is your theory for the superluminal connectedness evidensed by Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen with respect to electrons(the EPR effect) as well as the Clausen-Freedman experiment confirming the EPR effect with photons as well( Photons continue to 'communicate' their respective polarization while moving apart at the speed of light! Look,use logic, either sub-atomic entities are aware and alive and communicate with each other or their separation is an illusion,i.e. space itself is an illusion
I'll have to read more into it, my Physics is pretty rusty but this is a very interesting problem.
I can't imagine any scientific basis to introduce vague terms like 'alive' into the equation because it adds nothing of value - assuming for a moment these particles are called 'alive' (whatever that means) it still resoplves nothing about how it appears they communicate.
Andrewbreen took the biggest shit on your entire philosophy. How does that feel?
drone713 1 year ago
@drone713 not at all...it confirms what I am saying...space is a camouflage an illusion...as per Bell's theorem
JamesJTraitz 1 year ago
@JamesJTraitz No, not even close. You said that electrons come in pairs, which is completely wrong. How can you possibly say he confirmed your point?
drone713 1 year ago
@drone713 electrons in pairs at the shell level when caused to 'eject' from the atom as a result of a burst of energy (photons) always manifest oppositie spins and will maintain that opposite even when moving apart at space-time velocities ;if a Stern-Gerlach device is utilized to alter the spin of one, the other will change it's spin as well so as to remain in opposite spin !
JamesJTraitz 1 year ago
@JamesJTraitz Nope, wrong again. The other will NOT " it's spin to remain in opposite spin." That's the whole basis of your ridiculous theory that electrons are conscious and aware, and andrewbreen completely disproved you. I don't see how you could maintain that you were never disproved when andrewbreen's TRUE statement completely contradicts the basis of your argument for living energy.
drone713 1 year ago
@drone713 By the way what you have termed "your ridiculous theory" is Einstein's theory not mine; then again , uninformed and underread individuals make the kind of statements you ,in your ignorance, make...BTW...try familiarizing yourself with Dirac's equation and with QED- Quantum Electro Dynamics...learn how electrons going forward in time become positrons (anti-matter electrons) traveling bacwards in time !
JamesJTraitz 1 year ago
@drone713 Have you actually read or studied?! Einstein,Podolsky and Rosen demonstrated that an ejected pair of electrons will continue to correlate their respective spins even at space-time distances suggesting that ,either the electrons communicate with each other or space,itself, does not exist! i.e. seperation is an illusion.
JamesJTraitz 1 year ago
@JamesJTraitz Okay so you admit that the reason the electrons change spin simultaneously is because space is an illusion. Okay? Okay. Wait a second....in your video, "these electrons change spin simultaneously because they are aware." .......................DO YOU SEE WHAT I'M GETTING AT?
drone713 1 year ago
@drone713 It's either/or...as one electron's spin is altered by the Stern-Gerlach device it's 'twin' also changes it's own spin (up ,down ,left or right ) to remain opposite. How did it 'know' that the other electron's spin had changed ? Either, they communicate their spins or they are not truly separated! Kind of supports physicist David Bohm's cocept that the apparent separate parts of the universe are intimately connected that " at a deep and fundamental level is an unbroken wholeness"
JamesJTraitz 1 year ago
Actually, they are not two separate electrons, they only appear to us as such in our limited dimensions. When you see the electron pair and spin one electron, the "second" electron is merely the same electron from a different view (the connection between the two views occurs in a higher dimension). This explain the instantaneous reaction, they are one and the same electron.
andrewbreen 3 years ago 4
Space is the illusion we create out of fear. It is a manifestation of the need to see ourselves as separate. Letting go of this belief, we would treat the universe with the respect we would treat our own self.
watchmylips 3 years ago
@watchmylips lol dude, to say there is no space means to disagree with einestien himself. he proved through mathimatics (and has been proven over and over with experiements)that space and time exist and are one in the same, same goes with energy and matter..if you come up with some equations to back up your theory, ill start taking you seriously lol, untill then you are just talking out of your ass and disregarding the believe of ev
snakeeyes3883 1 year ago
Based on that experiment and the possible explanations of that experiment, the implications of how scientists, priests, bellhops and Burger flippers view the universe must be drastically altered and provoke a massive shift in conscious awareness creating huge debate about our universe on a mass scale. Now, Why is this information being held back, purposely suppressed and kept out of main stream thought?
The stuff is alive and intelligent on a sub atomic, sub nuclear level and beyond.
OpenMind00 3 years ago
haaaa ha ha ha ha ha, I give up. Just find me the quote from his notes that says exactly that and I'll eat my hat.
MaxSafeheaD 4 years ago
Are you unfamiliar with Einstein's reaction to the EPR effect?!
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
Not entirely - enough to presume to know Einstein would not have said anything like "either electrons are living, aware, energy in telepathic communication with each other or space dose not exist"
MaxSafeheaD 3 years ago
What is your theory for the superluminal connectedness evidensed by Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen with respect to electrons(the EPR effect) as well as the Clausen-Freedman experiment confirming the EPR effect with photons as well( Photons continue to 'communicate' their respective polarization while moving apart at the speed of light! Look,use logic, either sub-atomic entities are aware and alive and communicate with each other or their separation is an illusion,i.e. space itself is an illusion
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
I'll have to read more into it, my Physics is pretty rusty but this is a very interesting problem.
I can't imagine any scientific basis to introduce vague terms like 'alive' into the equation because it adds nothing of value - assuming for a moment these particles are called 'alive' (whatever that means) it still resoplves nothing about how it appears they communicate.
MaxSafeheaD 3 years ago