And I thought America was #1 in hollywormwood propaganda... but this piece proves the biggest worms are across the pond. King Edward Vlll would have saved England... instead you're losing her to be ruled by EUSSR.
What he didn't know and wasn't advised by Palace security, was that Wallis was a double German agent who worked for his father, George the Fifth. The King set him up, to take down a Christian heir and replace him with George VI, who called for Population Eugenics as early as 1945. Both Geo V and Geo VI wore the Iron Cross, which Edward did not. They were the Fascists, not he.
This, like every other Official Version, is fundamentally a lie. Edward was a confirmed Anglican who participated in NO Occult or Satanic coven. He admired Barry Goldwater, the Libertarian. He was PRO-Labor. Wallis, in turn, was an MI-5 whore who worked for George the Fifth. So, the whole story reeks of dysinfo.
edwaed had family roots in germany, spent holidaysthere as a child and spoke the language fluently. he was deeply disturbed by the carnage of the first world war maybe he was just trying to make peace to avoid another german war.misguided perhaps but deep reasons
He wasn't 'a great romantic' he was a charming egocentric who had no concept of self denial and had the money to indulge every whim... He thought he would get his way over Wallis Simpson, thank heaven he was proved wrong!
Irving's reputation as an historian was widely discredited after he brought an unsuccessful libel case against the American historian Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The court found that Irving was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite, and racist, who "associates with right-wing extremists who promote neo-Nazism,"] and that he had "for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence. One of your chums is he?
From reading proper history books it would seem that the main problem with Edward was that he was useless at even the most simple tasks; whether he was a Nazi or not hardly seemed to matter. Very clever of the government of the time to use the "smokescreen" of "marriage for love" to get rid of what they saw at best as an annoyance. Then they didn't have to call him a traitor or a dimwit.
He was forced to abdicate by the same Jews that bought Churchill and conned us into a war that ruined us and finally gave world power to the Jew that now enslaves us through world banks and their media. Churchill was in 1936 bought by a group of leading Zionists called the focus. Read Churchill's war and Hitler's war, by historian David Irvine.
@conspiracytheory1066 I could simply say you are quite mad but I shall be academic. You are just wrong. David Irvine has been proved to be a poor historian (by accepted standards); it is not a conspiracy against David Irvine, it is simply that his evidence is faulty or does not exist. Your rant is similarly without foundation - a Jewish conspiracy? It is true that the banking may enslave us but to say it is run by Jews or Zionists is simply not true. Paranoid rubbish from you.
@JackRance1910 David Irvine's books all have proof to back them up. He spent 10 years writing his book Hitlers war, and 20 years revising it to make sure it was 100% accurate. Other conformist historians get their so called "facts" from other books.
@JackRance1910 "Conspiracy" The UK PM Cameron has a jewish wife, his father Ian Donald Cameron comes from a family of polish bankers who helped Rothschild sell war bonds to Russia. I also just found something very disturbing, he was patron of the Jewish National Fund, thats not the bad bit, the worst part is that he is the first British prime minister not to be a patron of the "charity" in 120 years. The Jewish National Fund helps buy up Palestinian land for Israel.
@conspiracytheory1066 - You ARE quite mad. Do you really think The Telegraph and The Jewish post have "evidence" for your domination of the world by Jews? David Irvine has been reviled not because he is a Nazi, but because he is a poor historian - if he were Jewish or left wing he would still be a bad historian, because much is supposition. People who have your crackpot paranoid ideas always turn round and say - "another Jew supporter they are running everything including history."
@JackRance1910 David Irvine's books all have proof to back them up. He spent 10 years writing his book Hitlers war, and 20 years revising it to make sure it was 100% accurate. Other conformist historians get their so called "facts" from other books.
The notion that he gave up the throne for a love his mistress a touch too romantic in my opinion. Why would a playboy King give up his priviledge position for a woman whilst a dominantly agressive nazi regimed loomed over Europe( which he admired)? He was forced to abdicate.....
Contrasts: Edward VIII & Edward, Duke of Kent (E.VIII’s great grandfather ).
E. DofK separated from his love, M. St. Laurent, to marry and have a child (Q. Victoria ).
E.VIII, abdicated the English throne to marry his love, Wallis Simpson.
E. DoK restored the Gibraltar Colony in 1803, but was criticized.
E. VII was criticized for abdication, but perhaps he intended to deceive Hitler and position himself to moderate harsh subjugation of England if America remained neutral, and Germany won?
I wouldn't accuse Edvard VIII so fast...Probably he had Empire in mind.
Avoiding hughe war could have saved it.
Finaly, British policy was always that of preservation, of not being involved in damaging wars.
Who knows, Sunset at Kidney Ridge might never happened, if Churchill was clever as Roosevelt to outmaneuver Hitler. But he wasn't. He was a great orator though. :))
@penguin1818 Maybe you should get hold of the 1956 Encyclopaedia Britannica. The Holocaust wasn't called the Holocaust until the 1970s, so the suffering of the Jews under the Nazis is mentioned in the section on Jews, it was written by British Jewish historian Jacob Rader Marcus. Gas Chambers are not even mentioned. Churchill never mentioned gas chambers in his 6 volume account of WW2, nor did Eisenhower, nor de Gaulle, mention gas chambers in their books on WW2.
@lynchie3000 You need to work on your English reading comprehension. You've claimed penguin1818 made a reference to a specific term as used during or shortly after WWII.
Why you mention who did not mention gas chambers is irrelevant, nor does it have anything to do with the fact that gas chambers were a favorite widely used disposal method of a few million people by the Germans.
BTW. They also experimented with gas trucks to kill people on the way to mass burial sites, but it was inefficient
@yourtreat2 It's your reading comprehension that needs a little work, do you even know what it means, or were you just impressed when you heard it, and decided to repeat it?
The point I made was that the "gas chambers" were dismissed as Soviet propaganda by British Jewish scholars in the 1950s.
The English R simply Island Germans. There very language is nothing more than a dielect of Lowlands German. "Anglo-saxon" and "Chaucers English" are very close to Modern German. They are the trators! They turned against their blood cousins on the Continent and todays British are now paying the penality for it and they know it !
The English R simply Island Germans. There very language is nothing more than a dielect of Lowlands German. "Anglo-saxon" and "Caucers English" are very close to Modern German. They are the trators! They turned against their blood cousins on the Continent and todays British are now paying the penality for it and they know it !
The English R simply Island Germans. There very language is nothing more than a dielect of Lowlands German. "Anglo-saxon" and "Caucers English" are very close to Modern German. They are the trators! They turned against their blood cousins on the Continent and todays British are now paying the penality and they know it !
In '36- the Gov. appeased Hitler & self-disarmed. Churchill said Hitler would attack, and was called a War Monger. A hopeless situation for disarmed England! Did E. abdicate and fake a roll to position himself to mitigate harsh subjugation of England in future? In ‘40, did his words & dangerous wandering from Paris to Provence to Portugal, offer himself as “bait”, hoping to delay Hitler’s invasion past summer & radar setup? (Hitler did delay bombing) --Did Edward’s desperate acts save Briton?
I’m not sure, but perhaps the word “Briton” is better than “Britain” culturally, in this instance; although, in a true and larger perspective, Great Britain and the free world would be included.
When you think about it, the British should be grateful to the Americans for Wallis Simpson; Edward abdicated because of her, and England ended up with a much better king.
@TheHippyRose Well it wouldn't it have been ironic if Mr. Barnes had been part of the team arresting Wallis and Edward if they had went to Germany...??
@EuromanMovieReport Wallis was certainly in direct contact with the Nazi party, and times was willingly co-opted.
However, Edward VIII, even by the standards of his own day, was a shocking racist and eugenecist, and had political views very much in line with National Socialism.
It has now also been confirmed that he had expectations of being brought to power as a leader, if not a monarch, in the UK if the Nazis won the war, and even in the 1960s was still lamenting the outcome of the war/
@EuromanMovieReport you need to read the new biography on her "That Woman" by Anne Sebba, which was based on letters she'd written to her first husband, who she was reluctant to divorce. It goes a long way to cast the viewpoint that she was in control in to the "lie" heap.
@ImperialGuard9001 He was forced to abdicate if he did not abdicate parliament would have striped him of the crown which would have been a lot more embarrassing for him than to just give it up. Britain is a constitutional monarchy, he could not be king without the permission of parliament, it has been that way since the time of the British civil war and Oliver Cromwell.
Churchill and Roosevelt wanted war to improve their economies. They got their war. Edward wanted to have peace, and this is how a peacemaker is portrayed. Edward's statement about bombing England may seem cruel, but he saw it as the only way to bring about a quicker end to a war which was to take many more human lives if prolonged. Saving life, British or not, was the important thing for him. I am certain he knew nothing of the SS and their horrible murders of people in Poland.
The symapthies created among the german nazi leadership towards the British Monarchy also by King Edward VIII ultimatly saved the UK from being invaded in 1940 or spring 1941. The flight of Rudolf Hess is proving that till the highest levels of the NS Regime a full scale invasion of Britain was still not considered the only option to deal with the UK. ( but it was!)Today the British Peaceparty must be considered as an asset which made win the war to the allied. Irony of history, but a true fact.
i hate when a british narrator says "king of england", ignoring wales, scotland and northern ireland by complete. It's like saying "president of california" instead of president of the usa. It is an incorrection that is everywhere. England has not been a state since 300 years!
@jlya2012 The Monarch is head of the Church of England..If the little guy had married her there were people outside the palace gates having 'Carnal knowledge' of the Queen as well as her being divorced twice. Both Nazi sympathisers they told the Germans through a diplomat that the German invasion plans of Belgium had not been destroyed in an Air crash as they thought.The Germans instead then came theough the Ardennes and rolled up the British and Frebch Armies..We should have shot the twat!
If Winston Churchill can blow up French ships to stop them from being used by Hitler then surely assassinating a scumbag like Edward, would be no big deal since its only 1 life while them warships had thousands of men aboard.
I can understand why he gravitated toward Simpson. Edward never wanted to be King anyway. He wanted to be happy in life and if this woman gave him that then i say good for him. This ridiculous "do your duty" is crap. I would have never sacrificed my life for the monarchy. Now we see in the modern day monarchs that they marry who they want
Within 5 years of Hitler coming to power people were living in decent houses with steady jobs and buying cars..The world was taken in by the economic miracle of germany...Edward V111 was just another of his admirers and had that german connection...nobody realised at the time that he would conquer the whole of Europe and with his allies attempt to conquer the whole world.
The little guy was dominated by Wallace Simpson...I think he liked it...it was said that he was impotent until he met her....she must have blown his brains out ...literally.... He referred to German as his native tongue. The name 'Windsor' was taken from the castle as 'Sax Coburg' was embarrassing when we were losing thousands upon thousands of young men on the western front in the first war (Survivors aren't they!) Hitler thought he had it made...he didn't reckon on Churchill did he!
'Guilty men' is a book by michael Foot ..universities have copies lent out for a few hours at a time(It was banned)..Rudolph Hess flew here in 1940 to meet up with British Nazis (The Cliveden set) to see if the British people would follow the 'King' and not parliament...he could be king and marry wallace and germany could strike east at the Russians without watching their backs. Hess was tracked by the Observer Corps and the RAF across the North sea and Scotland without inteference....more.....
@tony00165 Hess landed near the Duke of Hamilton's estate(A British Nazi) after bailing out of his Me 110 and unbelievably was arrested by the local 'Bobby'. A woman who worked at the local hotel (16 then)was interviewed by the BBC and named politicians gathered there and said the king was also there..when they said the kings movement were accounted for for every second and she must be mistaken she said 'Not king George...the uncrowned King.....Edward...I saw him'....more...........
@tony00165 The lights of the local airfield were flicked on and off (With a german aircraft circling ???)..as a signal Hmmmmmmm..Hess had come on DIRECT ORDERS FROM HITLER..You cant just get in a plane and fly off without planning..The British public are being softened up by TV programmes about the 'Nazi King' for the papers which are due to be released.....just watch the shit hit the fan when the truth comes out ..D'you think this is bullshit..just wait...absolutely fascinating
If anyone knows where I can download / buy this documentary please tell me. I have searched for it for years and this YouTube series is all I have found. It would seem the House of Windsor and / or their apologists have done a very good job of seeing it is removed from commercial distribution.
What this narrative seeks to do is cleanse all blame of Nazi/fascist sympathies from the United Kingdom in particular and Western Europe in general by creating Edward Windsor an outlier to an otherwise stream of Resistance. The Resistance was negligible, particularly among Edward's class. Who's to say he wasn't a secret agent for the Brits to seek APPEASEMENT with Germany only on the condition he succeed. That Europe resisted Hitler is a myth. That Edward was odd in his support is another.
Sometimes Kings are bad eggs, which is why we have parliament. Sometimes parliament are bad eggs, which is why we have Kings. Blair's constitutional reforms leave us vulnerable to the will of politicians and are far from the elected lords he promised. Repeal this nonsense or replace the constitution, but we can't sit waiting for the next Hitler like this.
Yes! I suspect this is very much overdrawn. I don't like Edward, but he is not around to defend himself; so I think someone should say that there is not evidence that he betrayed his country.
As for Edward loving Germany, if he did he would have been the only member of the royal famly a that time to have done so.
I think this series takes a few pieces of circumstantial evidence, naive indescretions and hearsay evidence to an extreme conclusion. Edward might have been a fool, but he went through the abdication crisis like a constitutional monarch. Moreover, given the overall character of his life before and after the war, I don't see him consciously commiting treason for one minute.
@TheZanipolo Fabulous, glad hermaphrodites have a number too, are they any good? I presume you're a regular! ;-) (Don't mind me, I mock everyone, myself included - don't take it too personal unless you're that way inclined...)
Queen Mary was born in Kensington Palace and was a granddaughter of George III. This presupposes that she was born in Germany and that they had tons of immediate family and homes there. No monarch had been born in Germany for 200+ years.
@bn279626 Actually, Mary of Teck was the great-granddaugther of George III through her mother, Mary Adelaide of Cambridge, granddaughter of George III. And, of course, a member of the British Royal family was King of Hannover until 1866 and, until Victoria became Queen in 1837, the King of Great Britain was also King of Hannover. This leaves out, of course, the continuous marriages of the British royal family with German nobility.
@NosHabebitHumus "His mother was a German princess and they spent many happy holidays there" is an immensely misleading phrase, nonetheless.
Edward VIII's great-great Grandfather George III was the first Hanover King to be born in England. By comparison, most American's can't trace their residency back 6 generations.
@krugerfuchs Regardless or whether or not she was of German ancestry. By 1942, the royal family of England was, and it's well documented many within the royal family sympathized with Hitler and many of his ideas.
Anyone can understand the Duke of Windsors stance on having a possible peace with Hitler. If he had digressed into what was morally correct and should he have lived up to his responsibilities then a world of regrets would have shown him to be a fool for a bit of skirt.
Wallace was an excuse for the Government, I agree.
LOL... do you really suppose that it was the King directing government and not the Prime Minster and his cabinet? I love you your crazy .....lol
The king then and the queens authority was and is benign.
The power of the monarchy was extensively withdrawn by Queen Victoria.
If anyone says that the war was the nobles fault then you obviously do not understand the political stage in Europe in the 40s. The war was the fault of fascist power in Nazi Germany, like Hitler.
I've been a history buff for the past 30+ yrs. Have you read Dreadnought by R Massie? Or how about the Guns of August by B Tuchman? What about Blitzkrieg or Fighter by Len Deighton? 'Hitler' by Ian Kershaw? Pax Britannica by Morris? Your 2 most recent posts illustrates your total ignorance -re: WW2
Declassified docs prove EdVIII as a royal was granted special privileges, namely access to top secret Brit-Gov documents. In turn he revealed these secrets to Nazi sympathizers & spies.
That is a different way of looking at it, and yes, you're right, we might've had a Nazi king! (Although I doubt if the British people would have ever tolerated that)
Furhermore, they flagrantly violated the "Trading with the Enemy" Act which was punishable by death, by negoiating with the Nazis to keep their monies coming and their various properties intact. After the War, theirs was the only property untouched by either side, because the Nazis had vowed to protect it during Occupation.
In the weak-willed and adoring Edward, the more she treated him roughly (in public too), the more he adored her (cold-mother complex). He left foreign office dispatches lying around when the tart was with him, which she communicated to the Nazis.
It's not a matter of "being with the person you love". It's not a fish'n'chip shop love. He spent his whole life preparing for this responsibility. Walis Simpson was a conniving, ambitious, daring and ruthless person who wanted only riches and prominence.
if sombody told you that you cant be with the person you love lets how well you handle it.
sure edward did somthings that must people would think twice before doing but he was only human. maybe if he was allowed to mary wallis the royal family would be the mess that it is today.i also find it amazing how people bend the rules. Ed could not marry wallis but Charles could marry camilla. yea i know that times have changed but its still the same script but diffrent cast
Remember the Royal family was of German heritage.. Edwards father had the family name changed to cover that. The thing that amazes me is that so many US famous men were also Nazi sympathizers.. Joseph Kennedy, for one.
A: EDWARD VIII WAS MOST DEFINITELY THE TRAITOR KING
He betrayed G. Britain in spades, repeatedly.
Previously top secret FBI documents are chock-block full of Edward VIII's betrayals. Both Churchill & Roosevelt were fully aware of Edward's dirty secrets.
Recently revealed facts:
At a party in Vienna in 1937 Edward betrayed to an Italian diplomat details about how the Americans had cracked Italy's intelligence codes.
Following the Italian debacle Roosevelt had had enough of the loose lipped Edward VIII & with Churchill's blessing had the FBI monitor him.
More damning facts:
Edward revealed to the Germans that the secret German invasion plans for France had indeed fallen into British hands. The German plane carrying these had crashed, the pilot attempted to burn these plans but was unsure whether or not he was successful. Edward clarified this situation to the Nazis.
As a result of Edward informing the Nazis about their invasion plans being compromised - the Germans went with an alternative plan, attacking through the Ardennes which ultimately proved successful.
Then there is the fact that Edward, not only was he a traitor, but he was also a sniveling coward Churchill appointed him as a liaison to the French military, a post which he abandoned. He fled south, stripping the house he was staying in of many things including vehicles
Then in July '40 the German Ambassador to Lisbon passed on a message to Berlin which stated: "The Duke believes with certainty that continued heavy bombing would make England ready for peace"
The filthy, treacherous scumbag, Edward VIII was encouraging the Nazis to bomb his own people.
Then when he was stationed in the Bahamas he wrote: "After the war is over & Hitler has crushed the Americans we'll take over. The British don't want me as King but I'll be back as their leader"
@atrumira He wasnt encouraging nothing! He was just saing what everyone at the time believe in that if Germans sucessed in bombing Britain to submission UK would seek peace with Germany this was actualy Hitler plan all along since he had great admiration for the Germanic English and the rest of British People and their Empire. Edward VIII isnt the bad men that people have made him for most it he was actualy quite brave(even going to the point of wanting to serve in front of WW1) responsible
It saddens me that you are so very, very dense, so much so that I have to explain the following.
By informing the Nazis that continued heavy bombing would "make the British ready for peace" he was really telling them that indiscriminately killing British civilians would have the desired effect & that they were on the right track. Furthermore he was NEVER a target of these bombs, how vile & evil to condone this sort of thing on HIS OWN PEOPLE WHO WERE DYING IN THE THOUSANDS.
@atrumira Because he tough it would save lifes by bringing a quick end to the war (at least concerning the British people and UK) that was his idea all along I never saw anything on them of sociopatic nature or lack of love for his people in his actions he migh be a Pro NS but that doesnt mean he wasnt still British tough the all Royal House of Britain including himself is German in origin
@ImperialGuard9001: "Because he tough it would save lives by bringing a quick end to the war"
Show me where, in any historical document, there is evidence for this.
Regardless; a quick end to the war in the manner u state wud have involved the surrender of the British Isles. U do not appear to be British, I am & if u ask ANY Brit if he/she wud approve of this odds are overwhelmingly that they'd tell u to go fuck yourself.
P.S. Surrender wud have meant millions more murdered in Nazi death camps
@atrumira Not Surrender but some armisticie or peace treaty Germany coulnt take on the British Empire it would never be a surrender as for milions killed in death camps well at least milions woulnd be killed in Soviet death camps death marchs starvations mass killings etc if Germany won but still milions would die.. A fuck up situation for anny outcome
Edward cost the lives of many British/Americans whose shoes he was unworthy of shining. And if you doubt ANY of the facts I've presented you with let me know. All of this information is now declassified & readily available. If need be I can send you a PM as to where/how you can gain access to this info.
What they need to do now is dig up his wretched bones along w/ that bitch W. Simpson's, throw them in a box & fly them outside of UK territorial waters & dump them in the ocean.
theredraven: "They were probably cremated - Once someone is dead you leave them dead to rest whoever it may be..."
Wrongo, Edward VIII & Wallace Simpson are buried in the Royal Burial ground at Frogmore
All throughout history human remains have been moved around. Stalin was removed from his place next to Lenin in Red Square & while I'm not comparing Edward VIII to Stalin, EdVIII was a traitor who cost many British/Allies lives
Furthermore, any idea how many Egyptian mummies have been dug up?
Yes the King/Duke either deliberately or foolishly passed or allowed the passing of information to the enemy but all the while he was under suspicion.
The document suggests the possibility only. They documentary also states that after the suspicion were verified, such delicate information was with held from the King.
This is normal misdirection used in bias points of view, typically known in documentaries.
As my prof always told me, read between the lines.
apparently the british intelliigence authorities knew or could have offered a well-reasoned scenario for the future of the country in which pro-nazi forces would arise under Edward's approval. we should remember that germany's aggression was not tolerated only in relation to other european nations, while notions of "western supremacy" were shared by many nations regardless of their anti-german sentiments.
In addition, Edwards father George V was personally responsible for the death of the Romanoff famil by refusing his cousin "dearest Nicky" asylum in England. He was a do nothingking who allowed his subjects in Wales to endure poverty and unemployment for ten years, and did nothing to stop it. When Edward went there and saw the pitiful condition, he said "something must be done". When PM Stanley Baldwin heard that he knew Edward would be a political king. So Edward was forced to abdicate!
These video's are totally without merit. History proves that Neville Chamberlain, Stanley Baldwin and even Charles lindberg were pro Nazi before Hitler declared war. The videos are nothing but talking heads. If you notice, letter's are quoted but never shown.
It's interesting to note that, even had Edward served out his reign, Elizabeth would still be Queen today. The only difference would be that she would have ascended to the throne in 1972 rather than 1952.
Actually, if he had children then his children would suceed him, not Queen Elizabeth. She only became Queen because he abdicated and his brother, The Queen's father, took the throne.
he was weak and spoilt by his mother. his father was a cruel man. it was his treatment of georg vi that caused his speech defect. sexually, he was always searching for a mother. the royal family hated wallis. much of what we read about her ie. a prostitute in china, half male etc. none of this was true and can be traced back to the late queen mother. he didn't deserve to be treated like a leper and eliz 2 tried to make amends but it was all too late.
Henry VIII was CATHOLIC and considered himself one to the end of his life. He however refused to acknowledge the Pope as the head of the church. His son was staunchly Protestant
Henry VIII got divorced himself to marry a perfectly suitable girl who was a peer. Even Camilla would be an infinitely more suitable Queen than Mrs. Simpson. Bringing up the Tudor dynasty in relation to modern law is certainly daft, they usurped the throne and proceeded to murder every other legitimate claimant to remain in power.
Ohhh... who cares about this man? He left his country for the the woman her loved! HAH!
On the other hand, when I think about it, I am glad that her abdicated because if he hadn't then we wouldn't have our loving monarch, Elizabeth II on the throne...
So sad. When, as king, Edward said, (upon seeing the sad state of Welsh miners....I think), "Something must be done", it seems that he had feelings for those with less than he. So, I'd expect him to feel sympathy for ALL human beings, (even Jews in Germany?) Guess I was wrong. So sad. Maybe if he'd been surrounded by less prejudiced people, he would have turned out differently...
And I thought America was #1 in hollywormwood propaganda... but this piece proves the biggest worms are across the pond. King Edward Vlll would have saved England... instead you're losing her to be ruled by EUSSR.
westernciviliznation 5 days ago
Monarchy documentaries for grown-ups are thin on the ground in the UK but this was a first rate piece of work.
youngian 1 week ago
The disgrace was that of his father, George the Fifth.
shechaiyah 1 month ago
censored
shechaiyah 1 month ago
What he didn't know and wasn't advised by Palace security, was that Wallis was a double German agent who worked for his father, George the Fifth. The King set him up, to take down a Christian heir and replace him with George VI, who called for Population Eugenics as early as 1945. Both Geo V and Geo VI wore the Iron Cross, which Edward did not. They were the Fascists, not he.
shechaiyah 1 month ago
This, like every other Official Version, is fundamentally a lie. Edward was a confirmed Anglican who participated in NO Occult or Satanic coven. He admired Barry Goldwater, the Libertarian. He was PRO-Labor. Wallis, in turn, was an MI-5 whore who worked for George the Fifth. So, the whole story reeks of dysinfo.
shechaiyah 1 month ago 2
edwaed had family roots in germany, spent holidaysthere as a child and spoke the language fluently. he was deeply disturbed by the carnage of the first world war maybe he was just trying to make peace to avoid another german war.misguided perhaps but deep reasons
cartrefo2000 1 month ago
He wasn't 'a great romantic' he was a charming egocentric who had no concept of self denial and had the money to indulge every whim... He thought he would get his way over Wallis Simpson, thank heaven he was proved wrong!
suzannesadiiqa 1 month ago
Irving's reputation as an historian was widely discredited after he brought an unsuccessful libel case against the American historian Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The court found that Irving was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite, and racist, who "associates with right-wing extremists who promote neo-Nazism,"] and that he had "for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence. One of your chums is he?
JackRance1910 3 months ago
From reading proper history books it would seem that the main problem with Edward was that he was useless at even the most simple tasks; whether he was a Nazi or not hardly seemed to matter. Very clever of the government of the time to use the "smokescreen" of "marriage for love" to get rid of what they saw at best as an annoyance. Then they didn't have to call him a traitor or a dimwit.
JackRance1910 3 months ago
He was forced to abdicate by the same Jews that bought Churchill and conned us into a war that ruined us and finally gave world power to the Jew that now enslaves us through world banks and their media. Churchill was in 1936 bought by a group of leading Zionists called the focus. Read Churchill's war and Hitler's war, by historian David Irvine.
conspiracytheory1066 3 months ago
@conspiracytheory1066 I could simply say you are quite mad but I shall be academic. You are just wrong. David Irvine has been proved to be a poor historian (by accepted standards); it is not a conspiracy against David Irvine, it is simply that his evidence is faulty or does not exist. Your rant is similarly without foundation - a Jewish conspiracy? It is true that the banking may enslave us but to say it is run by Jews or Zionists is simply not true. Paranoid rubbish from you.
JackRance1910 3 months ago
@JackRance1910 David Irvine's books all have proof to back them up. He spent 10 years writing his book Hitlers war, and 20 years revising it to make sure it was 100% accurate. Other conformist historians get their so called "facts" from other books.
conspiracytheory1066 3 months ago
Comment removed
conspiracytheory1066 3 months ago
@JackRance1910 "Conspiracy" The UK PM Cameron has a jewish wife, his father Ian Donald Cameron comes from a family of polish bankers who helped Rothschild sell war bonds to Russia. I also just found something very disturbing, he was patron of the Jewish National Fund, thats not the bad bit, the worst part is that he is the first British prime minister not to be a patron of the "charity" in 120 years. The Jewish National Fund helps buy up Palestinian land for Israel.
conspiracytheory1066 3 months ago
@JackRance1910 My sources are: The Telegraph. wikipedia and the Jewish Post. Look for yourself.
conspiracytheory1066 3 months ago
@conspiracytheory1066 - You ARE quite mad. Do you really think The Telegraph and The Jewish post have "evidence" for your domination of the world by Jews? David Irvine has been reviled not because he is a Nazi, but because he is a poor historian - if he were Jewish or left wing he would still be a bad historian, because much is supposition. People who have your crackpot paranoid ideas always turn round and say - "another Jew supporter they are running everything including history."
JackRance1910 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JackRance1910 David Irvine's books all have proof to back them up. He spent 10 years writing his book Hitlers war, and 20 years revising it to make sure it was 100% accurate. Other conformist historians get their so called "facts" from other books.
conspiracytheory1066 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The notion that he gave up the throne for a love his mistress a touch too romantic in my opinion. Why would a playboy King give up his priviledge position for a woman whilst a dominantly agressive nazi regimed loomed over Europe( which he admired)? He was forced to abdicate.....
blackarawak83 5 months ago
Comment removed
blackarawak83 5 months ago
Pass the ear horn. Can't hear a thing!
DCFunBud 6 months ago
Contrasts: Edward VIII & Edward, Duke of Kent (E.VIII’s great grandfather ).
E. DofK separated from his love, M. St. Laurent, to marry and have a child (Q. Victoria ).
E.VIII, abdicated the English throne to marry his love, Wallis Simpson.
E. DoK restored the Gibraltar Colony in 1803, but was criticized.
E. VII was criticized for abdication, but perhaps he intended to deceive Hitler and position himself to moderate harsh subjugation of England if America remained neutral, and Germany won?
bcpii 6 months ago
last great king in england
21scuderia 7 months ago
Why Traitor?
ALBIBISBIS 7 months ago
Wonder if Mister Barns was angry at George.
EuromanMovieReport 8 months ago in playlist Edward Traitor King
Comment removed
OswaldCampbell 8 months ago
I wouldn't accuse Edvard VIII so fast...Probably he had Empire in mind.
Avoiding hughe war could have saved it.
Finaly, British policy was always that of preservation, of not being involved in damaging wars.
Who knows, Sunset at Kidney Ridge might never happened, if Churchill was clever as Roosevelt to outmaneuver Hitler. But he wasn't. He was a great orator though. :))
nestoIz1912 8 months ago
he was quoted saying to a friend later in his life saying "Hitler was not such a bad chap", this was years after WWII and the holocaust
penguin1818 9 months ago
@penguin1818 Maybe you should get hold of the 1956 Encyclopaedia Britannica. The Holocaust wasn't called the Holocaust until the 1970s, so the suffering of the Jews under the Nazis is mentioned in the section on Jews, it was written by British Jewish historian Jacob Rader Marcus. Gas Chambers are not even mentioned. Churchill never mentioned gas chambers in his 6 volume account of WW2, nor did Eisenhower, nor de Gaulle, mention gas chambers in their books on WW2.
lynchie3000 8 months ago
@lynchie3000 You need to work on your English reading comprehension. You've claimed penguin1818 made a reference to a specific term as used during or shortly after WWII.
Why you mention who did not mention gas chambers is irrelevant, nor does it have anything to do with the fact that gas chambers were a favorite widely used disposal method of a few million people by the Germans.
BTW. They also experimented with gas trucks to kill people on the way to mass burial sites, but it was inefficient
yourtreat2 8 months ago
@yourtreat2 It's your reading comprehension that needs a little work, do you even know what it means, or were you just impressed when you heard it, and decided to repeat it?
The point I made was that the "gas chambers" were dismissed as Soviet propaganda by British Jewish scholars in the 1950s.
btw:
Chelmno = gas vans
Treblinka = steam chambers later CO gas chambers
Belzec = electric chambers later CO gas chambers
Sobibor = CO gas chambers
Auschwitz & Majdanek = Zyklon B gas chambers
lynchie3000 8 months ago
@lynchie3000 Ah! Youbute! Why bother responding. You know how badly you express yourself.
yourtreat2 8 months ago
@yourtreat2
You really are 'Monkey See, Monkey Do' aren't you. Where is that phrase from? High School Musical!
That's us even on posts now, please don't reply.
lynchie3000 8 months ago
@lynchie3000 Ah! Youbute, again!
Why bother responding.
You know how badly you express yourself.
yourtreat2 8 months ago
They never let 60 minutes interview Hess in prison In 1987 before he died. He knew and they knew it
Kirk4279 9 months ago
The English R simply Island Germans. There very language is nothing more than a dielect of Lowlands German. "Anglo-saxon" and "Chaucers English" are very close to Modern German. They are the trators! They turned against their blood cousins on the Continent and todays British are now paying the penality for it and they know it !
Avalon400 9 months ago
The English R simply Island Germans. There very language is nothing more than a dielect of Lowlands German. "Anglo-saxon" and "Caucers English" are very close to Modern German. They are the trators! They turned against their blood cousins on the Continent and todays British are now paying the penality for it and they know it !
Avalon400 9 months ago
The English R simply Island Germans. There very language is nothing more than a dielect of Lowlands German. "Anglo-saxon" and "Caucers English" are very close to Modern German. They are the trators! They turned against their blood cousins on the Continent and todays British are now paying the penality and they know it !
Avalon400 9 months ago
In '36- the Gov. appeased Hitler & self-disarmed. Churchill said Hitler would attack, and was called a War Monger. A hopeless situation for disarmed England! Did E. abdicate and fake a roll to position himself to mitigate harsh subjugation of England in future? In ‘40, did his words & dangerous wandering from Paris to Provence to Portugal, offer himself as “bait”, hoping to delay Hitler’s invasion past summer & radar setup? (Hitler did delay bombing) --Did Edward’s desperate acts save Briton?
bcpii 9 months ago
@bcpii
I’m not sure, but perhaps the word “Briton” is better than “Britain” culturally, in this instance; although, in a true and larger perspective, Great Britain and the free world would be included.
bcpii 9 months ago
THE FUCKING BASTARD SHOULD HAVE BEEN HUNG AS A TRAITOR . PIECE OF FILTH .
dave2806 9 months ago
How do the British hate Edward VIII. I don't know if that is right. Perhaps it is. I just don't know.
Popperite 10 months ago
When you think about it, the British should be grateful to the Americans for Wallis Simpson; Edward abdicated because of her, and England ended up with a much better king.
Ezrateach 10 months ago 37
@Ezrateach And so that "Special Relationship" shall continue to flourish beautifully and remain strong for generations to come . . .
DaftSwank 10 months ago
@Ezrateach But because of the stress placed upon him, George VI died FAR too young. He will be missed.
SapphireCrusader1988 7 months ago
@Ezrateach Very true. Edward VIII was a cruel man.
warriorprince1010 4 months ago
no tuvo valor para reinar!!! y utilizo a una mujer como excusa
finijfk10 11 months ago
Are you guys 100% sure he (Edward) was the Nazi?? After having seen this program he seems stupid and looked to have been controlled by his wife....
I initially thought he was the bad guy, but after having seen this program several times now..I have come to the conclusion that she was the evil one.
EuromanMovieReport 11 months ago 4
@EuromanMovieReport I agree with you :) I think Wallis was the evil one
TheHippyRose 5 months ago
@TheHippyRose Well it wouldn't it have been ironic if Mr. Barnes had been part of the team arresting Wallis and Edward if they had went to Germany...??
EuromanMovieReport 5 months ago
@EuromanMovieReport Wallis was certainly in direct contact with the Nazi party, and times was willingly co-opted.
However, Edward VIII, even by the standards of his own day, was a shocking racist and eugenecist, and had political views very much in line with National Socialism.
It has now also been confirmed that he had expectations of being brought to power as a leader, if not a monarch, in the UK if the Nazis won the war, and even in the 1960s was still lamenting the outcome of the war/
disamjisa 3 weeks ago
@EuromanMovieReport you need to read the new biography on her "That Woman" by Anne Sebba, which was based on letters she'd written to her first husband, who she was reluctant to divorce. It goes a long way to cast the viewpoint that she was in control in to the "lie" heap.
kendahke 5 days ago
thankfully he was forced to abdicate. disgusting that he supported hitler
BoricuaDelight 11 months ago
@BoricuaDelight He choose to abdicate he wasnt forced
ImperialGuard9001 11 months ago
@ImperialGuard9001 He was forced to abdicate if he did not abdicate parliament would have striped him of the crown which would have been a lot more embarrassing for him than to just give it up. Britain is a constitutional monarchy, he could not be king without the permission of parliament, it has been that way since the time of the British civil war and Oliver Cromwell.
trinapinks 11 months ago 2
@trinapinks hey just wanted to say tyvm for clarifying to ImperialG that Edward was indeed forced to abdicate in a roundabout way.
BoricuaDelight 11 months ago
@trinapinks I would say has been this way since the time of Glorious Revolution I woulnt say Cromwell wasnt very constutional...
ImperialGuard9001 11 months ago
Churchill and Roosevelt wanted war to improve their economies. They got their war. Edward wanted to have peace, and this is how a peacemaker is portrayed. Edward's statement about bombing England may seem cruel, but he saw it as the only way to bring about a quicker end to a war which was to take many more human lives if prolonged. Saving life, British or not, was the important thing for him. I am certain he knew nothing of the SS and their horrible murders of people in Poland.
Iceland1944 11 months ago
@JinkyManJet I'd rather be a dirty nigger than a racist
PandaDelight 1 year ago
Ahhh, too bad for you, PandaDelight. You managed to encompass all the worst qualities of ... whatever your group is.
AppleSouffle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
date an Russain women and marry her gettop5.info
alizanorrellfht 1 year ago
The symapthies created among the german nazi leadership towards the British Monarchy also by King Edward VIII ultimatly saved the UK from being invaded in 1940 or spring 1941. The flight of Rudolf Hess is proving that till the highest levels of the NS Regime a full scale invasion of Britain was still not considered the only option to deal with the UK. ( but it was!)Today the British Peaceparty must be considered as an asset which made win the war to the allied. Irony of history, but a true fact.
NickVenture1 1 year ago
I remember reading somewhere that Queen Mary lived in a set of grace-and-favour apartments in Kensington Palace as a child
RebelliousOne12 1 year ago
He was so selfish! I love our current Queen! She is so dutiful and lovely!
324wilson 1 year ago 6
Comment removed
johnjanpopovic 4 months ago
filthy greedy whore....
ultracairo 1 year ago 2
People say Kate Middleton is too tan to be a princess, imagine if she was twice divorced? We've not come very far
counterhon 1 year ago
i hate when a british narrator says "king of england", ignoring wales, scotland and northern ireland by complete. It's like saying "president of california" instead of president of the usa. It is an incorrection that is everywhere. England has not been a state since 300 years!
simon12291 1 year ago 3
@simon12291 Edward was king of the whole island of Ireland.
JuanMacready 1 year ago
Edward VIII was a hero.
JuanMacready 1 year ago
Edward was a hero and did what was right so all I have to say is god save the king
gymboy319 1 year ago
@gymboy319 He's dead.
yvonnel 11 months ago
@yvonnel No Shit Sherlock
I Still have a great deal of respect for him and his brothe GerogeVI
gymboy319 9 months ago
@gymboy319 How can G-d "save" someone who is dead, Brilliant Bonce?
yvonnel 9 months ago
Why was he not assassinated before he became King, had he not met Simpson(?) then he could very well have been the Nazi King.
HateFenians 1 year ago
@jlya2012 The Monarch is head of the Church of England..If the little guy had married her there were people outside the palace gates having 'Carnal knowledge' of the Queen as well as her being divorced twice. Both Nazi sympathisers they told the Germans through a diplomat that the German invasion plans of Belgium had not been destroyed in an Air crash as they thought.The Germans instead then came theough the Ardennes and rolled up the British and Frebch Armies..We should have shot the twat!
tony00165 1 year ago
If Winston Churchill can blow up French ships to stop them from being used by Hitler then surely assassinating a scumbag like Edward, would be no big deal since its only 1 life while them warships had thousands of men aboard.
HateFenians 1 year ago 2
Interesting.
rwitherspoon33 1 year ago
I can understand why he gravitated toward Simpson. Edward never wanted to be King anyway. He wanted to be happy in life and if this woman gave him that then i say good for him. This ridiculous "do your duty" is crap. I would have never sacrificed my life for the monarchy. Now we see in the modern day monarchs that they marry who they want
creolelady182 1 year ago
ahhh thank god he Abdicated
josiahivan 1 year ago
How do these men get empowered? They choose the right parents it seems.
nergvol 1 year ago
Within 5 years of Hitler coming to power people were living in decent houses with steady jobs and buying cars..The world was taken in by the economic miracle of germany...Edward V111 was just another of his admirers and had that german connection...nobody realised at the time that he would conquer the whole of Europe and with his allies attempt to conquer the whole world.
tony00165 1 year ago
The little guy was dominated by Wallace Simpson...I think he liked it...it was said that he was impotent until he met her....she must have blown his brains out ...literally.... He referred to German as his native tongue. The name 'Windsor' was taken from the castle as 'Sax Coburg' was embarrassing when we were losing thousands upon thousands of young men on the western front in the first war (Survivors aren't they!) Hitler thought he had it made...he didn't reckon on Churchill did he!
tony00165 1 year ago
'Guilty men' is a book by michael Foot ..universities have copies lent out for a few hours at a time(It was banned)..Rudolph Hess flew here in 1940 to meet up with British Nazis (The Cliveden set) to see if the British people would follow the 'King' and not parliament...he could be king and marry wallace and germany could strike east at the Russians without watching their backs. Hess was tracked by the Observer Corps and the RAF across the North sea and Scotland without inteference....more.....
tony00165 1 year ago
@tony00165 Hess landed near the Duke of Hamilton's estate(A British Nazi) after bailing out of his Me 110 and unbelievably was arrested by the local 'Bobby'. A woman who worked at the local hotel (16 then)was interviewed by the BBC and named politicians gathered there and said the king was also there..when they said the kings movement were accounted for for every second and she must be mistaken she said 'Not king George...the uncrowned King.....Edward...I saw him'....more...........
tony00165 1 year ago
@tony00165 The lights of the local airfield were flicked on and off (With a german aircraft circling ???)..as a signal Hmmmmmmm..Hess had come on DIRECT ORDERS FROM HITLER..You cant just get in a plane and fly off without planning..The British public are being softened up by TV programmes about the 'Nazi King' for the papers which are due to be released.....just watch the shit hit the fan when the truth comes out ..D'you think this is bullshit..just wait...absolutely fascinating
tony00165 1 year ago
@tony00165 totally agree but the juicy bit will not be there [something tells me ]
RICHARDTOMLEY10WHARF 1 year ago
If anyone knows where I can download / buy this documentary please tell me. I have searched for it for years and this YouTube series is all I have found. It would seem the House of Windsor and / or their apologists have done a very good job of seeing it is removed from commercial distribution.
jsmilgin 1 year ago
@jsmilgin Me too...
littleshoemaker 1 year ago
Like Prince Charles, He had to have a talking donkey for a wife. Camilla and Wallis =2 talking donkeys. Go figure English men.
gotch09 1 year ago 2
I just saw the movie Wallis and Edward 2005. They have it on Netflix.
Lismetdetu 1 year ago
Does anyone know where I can BUY this documentary? I taped it years ago onto VHS, but that tape is history. Any help here would be much appreciated!
jsmilgin 1 year ago
What this narrative seeks to do is cleanse all blame of Nazi/fascist sympathies from the United Kingdom in particular and Western Europe in general by creating Edward Windsor an outlier to an otherwise stream of Resistance. The Resistance was negligible, particularly among Edward's class. Who's to say he wasn't a secret agent for the Brits to seek APPEASEMENT with Germany only on the condition he succeed. That Europe resisted Hitler is a myth. That Edward was odd in his support is another.
EastofModernity 1 year ago
Sometimes Kings are bad eggs, which is why we have parliament. Sometimes parliament are bad eggs, which is why we have Kings. Blair's constitutional reforms leave us vulnerable to the will of politicians and are far from the elected lords he promised. Repeal this nonsense or replace the constitution, but we can't sit waiting for the next Hitler like this.
jacksawild 1 year ago
Madonna is making a movie about them called W.E that will come out next year.
fraaijen 1 year ago
He wasn't a traitor, he was just a man that sought peace, a good man, just like Mosley.
Schneider10101 1 year ago
He wasn't a traitor - he was a good man. ;D
Schneider10101 1 year ago
Yes! I suspect this is very much overdrawn. I don't like Edward, but he is not around to defend himself; so I think someone should say that there is not evidence that he betrayed his country.
As for Edward loving Germany, if he did he would have been the only member of the royal famly a that time to have done so.
mc0558 1 year ago
I think this series takes a few pieces of circumstantial evidence, naive indescretions and hearsay evidence to an extreme conclusion. Edward might have been a fool, but he went through the abdication crisis like a constitutional monarch. Moreover, given the overall character of his life before and after the war, I don't see him consciously commiting treason for one minute.
mc0558 1 year ago
The Royal family are of mixed race, all this Nazi propaganda was a joke any way.
lovesexpistols134 1 year ago
What a legend...
MrComacchio 1 year ago
Simpson was a whore when she was in China, and she was also a hermaphrodite, which interested the perverse Edward VIII
TheZanipolo 1 year ago
Really? Were you one of her clients? =)
-X-X-X-
saxonrain 1 year ago
@saxonrain before my time! but Edward VIII said she was "twice as much fun as a normal woman"
If you are affected by hermaphrodite issues, call the hermaphrodite helpline
TheZanipolo 1 year ago
@TheZanipolo Fabulous, glad hermaphrodites have a number too, are they any good? I presume you're a regular! ;-) (Don't mind me, I mock everyone, myself included - don't take it too personal unless you're that way inclined...)
-X-X-X-
saxonrain 1 year ago
is not true the british destroid him because he love a divorcée
GucciBoy37 2 years ago
WHo was the one who betrayed? The war mongering clique of Churchill and his jewish cabinet?
Post war propaganda for idiots once more
Napoleontas 2 years ago
Who cares if he was a Nazi? He was still a racist!
But above all, he has also been dead for almost 40 years. So "Who Cares" squared.
BarryDennen12 2 years ago
Racism is good.
JuanMacready 1 year ago
1:24 My God--Evil King!
TiaChurch 2 years ago
In other words, I'd call that beginning just a tad bit melodramatic.
TiaChurch 2 years ago
Queen Mary was born in Kensington Palace and was a granddaughter of George III. This presupposes that she was born in Germany and that they had tons of immediate family and homes there. No monarch had been born in Germany for 200+ years.
bn279626 2 years ago 20
@bn279626 Actually, Mary of Teck was the great-granddaugther of George III through her mother, Mary Adelaide of Cambridge, granddaughter of George III. And, of course, a member of the British Royal family was King of Hannover until 1866 and, until Victoria became Queen in 1837, the King of Great Britain was also King of Hannover. This leaves out, of course, the continuous marriages of the British royal family with German nobility.
NosHabebitHumus 1 year ago
@NosHabebitHumus "His mother was a German princess and they spent many happy holidays there" is an immensely misleading phrase, nonetheless.
Edward VIII's great-great Grandfather George III was the first Hanover King to be born in England. By comparison, most American's can't trace their residency back 6 generations.
bn279626 1 year ago
@bn279626 When one is born in Kensington Palace one is obviously not born in Germany!
Popperite 10 months ago
@bn279626 And she was not a grandaugter of George III, A greatgranddaughter!
Popperite 10 months ago
@bn279626 Sorry about that
Popperite 10 months ago
@bn279626 why does everyone think she was german it was her father not her i even corrected the weakest link on it
krugerfuchs 8 months ago
@krugerfuchs Regardless or whether or not she was of German ancestry. By 1942, the royal family of England was, and it's well documented many within the royal family sympathized with Hitler and many of his ideas.
yourtreat2 8 months ago
Painfully I have to agree with your comments.
Anyone can understand the Duke of Windsors stance on having a possible peace with Hitler. If he had digressed into what was morally correct and should he have lived up to his responsibilities then a world of regrets would have shown him to be a fool for a bit of skirt.
Wallace was an excuse for the Government, I agree.
deskpot1 2 years ago
LOL... do you really suppose that it was the King directing government and not the Prime Minster and his cabinet? I love you your crazy .....lol
The king then and the queens authority was and is benign.
The power of the monarchy was extensively withdrawn by Queen Victoria.
If anyone says that the war was the nobles fault then you obviously do not understand the political stage in Europe in the 40s. The war was the fault of fascist power in Nazi Germany, like Hitler.
deskpot1 2 years ago
Comment removed
atrumira 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
deskpot1,
I've been a history buff for the past 30+ yrs. Have you read Dreadnought by R Massie? Or how about the Guns of August by B Tuchman? What about Blitzkrieg or Fighter by Len Deighton? 'Hitler' by Ian Kershaw? Pax Britannica by Morris? Your 2 most recent posts illustrates your total ignorance -re: WW2
Declassified docs prove EdVIII as a royal was granted special privileges, namely access to top secret Brit-Gov documents. In turn he revealed these secrets to Nazi sympathizers & spies.
atrumira 2 years ago
LOL... do you really suppose that it was the King directing government and not the Prime Minster and his cabinet? I love you your crazy .....lol
The king then and the queens authority was and is benign.
The power of the monarchy was extensively withdrawn by Queen Victoria and Prince Albert.
If anyone says that the war was the nobles fault then you obviously do not understand the political stage in Europe in the 1940s
The war was the fault of fascist power in Nazi Germany, like Hitler.
deskpot1 2 years ago
Wallace Simpson. The last sort of person that anyone would wanna fall in love with.
3NUNS 2 years ago
That is a different way of looking at it, and yes, you're right, we might've had a Nazi king! (Although I doubt if the British people would have ever tolerated that)
Mallarmee 2 years ago 2
Furhermore, they flagrantly violated the "Trading with the Enemy" Act which was punishable by death, by negoiating with the Nazis to keep their monies coming and their various properties intact. After the War, theirs was the only property untouched by either side, because the Nazis had vowed to protect it during Occupation.
Mallarmee 2 years ago
In the weak-willed and adoring Edward, the more she treated him roughly (in public too), the more he adored her (cold-mother complex). He left foreign office dispatches lying around when the tart was with him, which she communicated to the Nazis.
Mallarmee 2 years ago
It's not a matter of "being with the person you love". It's not a fish'n'chip shop love. He spent his whole life preparing for this responsibility. Walis Simpson was a conniving, ambitious, daring and ruthless person who wanted only riches and prominence.
Mallarmee 2 years ago
if sombody told you that you cant be with the person you love lets how well you handle it.
sure edward did somthings that must people would think twice before doing but he was only human. maybe if he was allowed to mary wallis the royal family would be the mess that it is today.i also find it amazing how people bend the rules. Ed could not marry wallis but Charles could marry camilla. yea i know that times have changed but its still the same script but diffrent cast
prowlifik 2 years ago
Remember the Royal family was of German heritage.. Edwards father had the family name changed to cover that. The thing that amazes me is that so many US famous men were also Nazi sympathizers.. Joseph Kennedy, for one.
cushing1961 2 years ago
Also he was bitter about England because this bitch didn't get the title "HRH" . He thought Hitler would help him to revenge England !
betweenyouandsky 2 years ago
Yes,he did try to betray his own country !!!
He was fluent in German and he loved everything about Germany. He was crazy about Hitler also and he didn't hide it.
He could have been the worst king if he was to become the king of England.
That's the truth.
betweenyouandsky 2 years ago 3
Calling Edward V111 the traitor king is absolute bullshit.
He would never betray this country.
EXIBITIONIST 2 years ago
EXIBITIONIST,
Re: "Calling Edward V111 the traitor king..."
A: EDWARD VIII WAS MOST DEFINITELY THE TRAITOR KING
He betrayed G. Britain in spades, repeatedly.
Previously top secret FBI documents are chock-block full of Edward VIII's betrayals. Both Churchill & Roosevelt were fully aware of Edward's dirty secrets.
Recently revealed facts:
At a party in Vienna in 1937 Edward betrayed to an Italian diplomat details about how the Americans had cracked Italy's intelligence codes.
Con't >
atrumira 2 years ago
Edward VIII's betrayals con't.
Following the Italian debacle Roosevelt had had enough of the loose lipped Edward VIII & with Churchill's blessing had the FBI monitor him.
More damning facts:
Edward revealed to the Germans that the secret German invasion plans for France had indeed fallen into British hands. The German plane carrying these had crashed, the pilot attempted to burn these plans but was unsure whether or not he was successful. Edward clarified this situation to the Nazis.
atrumira 2 years ago
Edward the Traitor con't:
As a result of Edward informing the Nazis about their invasion plans being compromised - the Germans went with an alternative plan, attacking through the Ardennes which ultimately proved successful.
Then there is the fact that Edward, not only was he a traitor, but he was also a sniveling coward Churchill appointed him as a liaison to the French military, a post which he abandoned. He fled south, stripping the house he was staying in of many things including vehicles
atrumira 2 years ago
Comment removed
atrumira 2 years ago
Edward VIII:
Then in July '40 the German Ambassador to Lisbon passed on a message to Berlin which stated: "The Duke believes with certainty that continued heavy bombing would make England ready for peace"
The filthy, treacherous scumbag, Edward VIII was encouraging the Nazis to bomb his own people.
Then when he was stationed in the Bahamas he wrote: "After the war is over & Hitler has crushed the Americans we'll take over. The British don't want me as King but I'll be back as their leader"
atrumira 2 years ago 10
@atrumira He wasnt encouraging nothing! He was just saing what everyone at the time believe in that if Germans sucessed in bombing Britain to submission UK would seek peace with Germany this was actualy Hitler plan all along since he had great admiration for the Germanic English and the rest of British People and their Empire. Edward VIII isnt the bad men that people have made him for most it he was actualy quite brave(even going to the point of wanting to serve in front of WW1) responsible
ImperialGuard9001 11 months ago
polite intelegent and patriotic(otherwise he wouldnt abidicate his trone for sake of Britain!
ImperialGuard9001 11 months ago
@ImperialGuard9001 He was a Nazi loving dick and that is why he is considered to be a coward and a traitor.
trinapinks 11 months ago 3
Comment removed
atrumira 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trinapinks: "He was a Nazi loving dick and that is why he is considered to be a coward and a traitor"
Could it be put more straightforward or more truthfully than this?
I think not.
atrumira 11 months ago 2
@ImperialGuard9001
It saddens me that you are so very, very dense, so much so that I have to explain the following.
By informing the Nazis that continued heavy bombing would "make the British ready for peace" he was really telling them that indiscriminately killing British civilians would have the desired effect & that they were on the right track. Furthermore he was NEVER a target of these bombs, how vile & evil to condone this sort of thing on HIS OWN PEOPLE WHO WERE DYING IN THE THOUSANDS.
atrumira 11 months ago
@atrumira Because he tough it would save lifes by bringing a quick end to the war (at least concerning the British people and UK) that was his idea all along I never saw anything on them of sociopatic nature or lack of love for his people in his actions he migh be a Pro NS but that doesnt mean he wasnt still British tough the all Royal House of Britain including himself is German in origin
ImperialGuard9001 11 months ago
@ImperialGuard9001: "Because he tough it would save lives by bringing a quick end to the war"
Show me where, in any historical document, there is evidence for this.
Regardless; a quick end to the war in the manner u state wud have involved the surrender of the British Isles. U do not appear to be British, I am & if u ask ANY Brit if he/she wud approve of this odds are overwhelmingly that they'd tell u to go fuck yourself.
P.S. Surrender wud have meant millions more murdered in Nazi death camps
atrumira 11 months ago
@atrumira Not Surrender but some armisticie or peace treaty Germany coulnt take on the British Empire it would never be a surrender as for milions killed in death camps well at least milions woulnd be killed in Soviet death camps death marchs starvations mass killings etc if Germany won but still milions would die.. A fuck up situation for anny outcome
ImperialGuard9001 11 months ago
Edward cost the lives of many British/Americans whose shoes he was unworthy of shining. And if you doubt ANY of the facts I've presented you with let me know. All of this information is now declassified & readily available. If need be I can send you a PM as to where/how you can gain access to this info.
What they need to do now is dig up his wretched bones along w/ that bitch W. Simpson's, throw them in a box & fly them outside of UK territorial waters & dump them in the ocean.
Good riddance.
atrumira 2 years ago
1. They were probably cremated
2. Desecrating someones remains is vile. Once somone is dead you leave them dead to rest whoever it may be, however disgusting they may be.
theredraven 2 years ago
theredraven: "They were probably cremated - Once someone is dead you leave them dead to rest whoever it may be..."
Wrongo, Edward VIII & Wallace Simpson are buried in the Royal Burial ground at Frogmore
All throughout history human remains have been moved around. Stalin was removed from his place next to Lenin in Red Square & while I'm not comparing Edward VIII to Stalin, EdVIII was a traitor who cost many British/Allies lives
Furthermore, any idea how many Egyptian mummies have been dug up?
atrumira 2 years ago
Comment removed
deskpot1 2 years ago
Yes the King/Duke either deliberately or foolishly passed or allowed the passing of information to the enemy but all the while he was under suspicion.
The document suggests the possibility only. They documentary also states that after the suspicion were verified, such delicate information was with held from the King.
This is normal misdirection used in bias points of view, typically known in documentaries.
As my prof always told me, read between the lines.
deskpot1 2 years ago
apparently the british intelliigence authorities knew or could have offered a well-reasoned scenario for the future of the country in which pro-nazi forces would arise under Edward's approval. we should remember that germany's aggression was not tolerated only in relation to other european nations, while notions of "western supremacy" were shared by many nations regardless of their anti-german sentiments.
spiderlime 2 years ago
In addition, Edwards father George V was personally responsible for the death of the Romanoff famil by refusing his cousin "dearest Nicky" asylum in England. He was a do nothingking who allowed his subjects in Wales to endure poverty and unemployment for ten years, and did nothing to stop it. When Edward went there and saw the pitiful condition, he said "something must be done". When PM Stanley Baldwin heard that he knew Edward would be a political king. So Edward was forced to abdicate!
MrHuntsman77 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrHuntsman77 2 years ago
These video's are totally without merit. History proves that Neville Chamberlain, Stanley Baldwin and even Charles lindberg were pro Nazi before Hitler declared war. The videos are nothing but talking heads. If you notice, letter's are quoted but never shown.
These videos do not belong on YouTube!
MrHuntsman77 2 years ago
It's interesting to note that, even had Edward served out his reign, Elizabeth would still be Queen today. The only difference would be that she would have ascended to the throne in 1972 rather than 1952.
deyo3396 2 years ago
Actually, if he had children then his children would suceed him, not Queen Elizabeth. She only became Queen because he abdicated and his brother, The Queen's father, took the throne.
monarchy4life 2 years ago
The crown cannot be capable of treason upon itself. This "documentary" is disgusting.
OnTheRazorsEdge 2 years ago
he was weak and spoilt by his mother. his father was a cruel man. it was his treatment of georg vi that caused his speech defect. sexually, he was always searching for a mother. the royal family hated wallis. much of what we read about her ie. a prostitute in china, half male etc. none of this was true and can be traced back to the late queen mother. he didn't deserve to be treated like a leper and eliz 2 tried to make amends but it was all too late.
johneunson 2 years ago
George V was not an "autocratic and distant father" though I imagine he was a distant father.
bsm1095 2 years ago
Traitor he should serve his country i am glad however he did not
Oneandoneself 2 years ago
Comment removed
NeutronZapper 2 years ago
Nazi fucker
MrVideoPerv 2 years ago
Shits with money
ControlFreakElite 2 years ago
He was a nazi and she was a upper-class hooker
wedrinkmountaindew 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Henry VIII was CATHOLIC and considered himself one to the end of his life. He however refused to acknowledge the Pope as the head of the church. His son was staunchly Protestant
bcpuppy 2 years ago
Dead right nothing stronger than love, he should have been allowed to be king and marry simpson, Henry VIII did exactly this,
its why we are protestant
unigateman 2 years ago
Comment removed
bcpuppy 2 years ago
Henry VIII got divorced himself to marry a perfectly suitable girl who was a peer. Even Camilla would be an infinitely more suitable Queen than Mrs. Simpson. Bringing up the Tudor dynasty in relation to modern law is certainly daft, they usurped the throne and proceeded to murder every other legitimate claimant to remain in power.
bsm1095 2 years ago
Ohhh... who cares about this man? He left his country for the the woman her loved! HAH!
On the other hand, when I think about it, I am glad that her abdicated because if he hadn't then we wouldn't have our loving monarch, Elizabeth II on the throne...
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!!!
324wilson 2 years ago 4
So sad. When, as king, Edward said, (upon seeing the sad state of Welsh miners....I think), "Something must be done", it seems that he had feelings for those with less than he. So, I'd expect him to feel sympathy for ALL human beings, (even Jews in Germany?) Guess I was wrong. So sad. Maybe if he'd been surrounded by less prejudiced people, he would have turned out differently...
UTAOUB 2 years ago