Dr Steve Jones like Mr. David Griffin winds up every 5 mins in a self-congratulatory chuckle. This is a dire subject. To those two: just because you have encountered the ridiculous in the govt tale (that insults the victims, really), doesn't mean you have to telegraph it with a laugh. Just parse your re-take down to the colloquial, if you can - like say Graeme MacQueen does - and serve it cold.
these people who did the 9/11 were evil and the world should be punished them. 2 wars ensued and ongoing thousands dead... OF COURSE THE TRUTH SHOULD BE KNOWN OR THIS 9/11 should not be used to justify anything else
so, what is your theory on why the collapse started at the point where the planes hit? because personally, i dont think explosives were used to initiate the collapse. first thing would be that no explosives could have survived the plane crash in the first place.
quote ..."why the collapse started at the point where the planes hit"
-----------
The planted explosive cutting devices (if that was was done) would be at regular intervals along key core steel columns. Detonations would be timed to cuase collapse from top down
---------
quote... "no explosives could have survived the plane crash
----------
explosive at levels above and below level of impact would indeed survive.
"explosive at levels above and below level of impact would indeed survive."
so once again i ask you, why the collapse started at the point of plane contact?
the explosive theory is wild and unfounded. its made up by a bunch of people who read a couple of articles on explosives and science and then apply them to 911. its easy to point out the flaws in the theory if you know science.
Theoretically, if some party had pre-planted explosives and waited for the pre-known day when 'terrorists' would fly the planes into them, they would have it arranged so they could signal the destruction from the level of the planes' collisions to ensure the idea that the planes caused the collapses. If they had collapsed from the bottom of the buildings, there'd be obvious suspicion. Capable people could arrange the timing system (real time/computer controlled) to set off how they wanted.
"they would have it arranged so they could signal the destruction from the level of the planes' collisions
--------
To clarify... they would have to observe the levels of plane collisions after the collisions and then set the demolition sequences (computer controlled signal system?) based on that observation since the planes might not strike at a vertical level that could be pre-determined within accuracy.
Galileo who tested falling objects would see near free-fall speed as a problem
The explosives theory is made partly due to Building 7 (also visual, sonic, seismic observations of WTC1 and WTC2 on that day).
Building 7 had some damage to the south side but was not hit by a plane. Visually it appeared to have few fires. The collapse was exactly straight down with the top penthouse starting to cave first. Speed of collapse was close to free-fall speed. If this building was demolition it implies pre-planted devices.
NIST and US Govt have acted in a fashion of cover up.
One odd thing is the videos of the tower with the antena on top (WTC1 or WTC2) was very angled at start of collapse (12 -15 degrees?). Watch other videos carefully and you see top sections seem to collapse into themselves before main building sections start falling.
they just don't want to American people to know the truth. great video. the media is scared that's why you and I have to keep posting videos like this.
Google these following things. All will be answered. Remember how much opiates (poppy) plays a role in prescription drugs.
"Iran-Contra affair", "Zapata Corp", "The Bay of Pigs", "Skull and Bone's Opium trades ", "Mullah Mohammed Omar's ban on opium in 2000", "prescott bush", "Hitler's angel", "poppy yields for 2000, 2001, 2002, 2007", "PBS documentary, 'America Rebuilds'. ", "Securacom "
"Larry A. Silverstein" "Russell and Company ", "Samuel Russell",
Dr Steve Jones like Mr. David Griffin winds up every 5 mins in a self-congratulatory chuckle. This is a dire subject. To those two: just because you have encountered the ridiculous in the govt tale (that insults the victims, really), doesn't mean you have to telegraph it with a laugh. Just parse your re-take down to the colloquial, if you can - like say Graeme MacQueen does - and serve it cold.
newsmanbluesman 4 weeks ago
Perhaps controversial tv might show this (Sky channel 200). They showed Zeitgeist and Aaron Russo's documentary 'America: Freedom to Fascism'
galti111 7 months ago
...question IS...is there ANY Network on TV that is brave enough to AIR this great piece of work???
Markemark44 1 year ago
The vocal audio is poor and you add music at 2:55??
bah!!
RooFx 1 year ago
these people who did the 9/11 were evil and the world should be punished them. 2 wars ensued and ongoing thousands dead... OF COURSE THE TRUTH SHOULD BE KNOWN OR THIS 9/11 should not be used to justify anything else
mjsoyfoo 1 year ago
Killer new doc - 911 truth forever.
kenjams 2 years ago
so, what is your theory on why the collapse started at the point where the planes hit? because personally, i dont think explosives were used to initiate the collapse. first thing would be that no explosives could have survived the plane crash in the first place.
matchesison 3 years ago
quote ..."why the collapse started at the point where the planes hit"
-----------
The planted explosive cutting devices (if that was was done) would be at regular intervals along key core steel columns. Detonations would be timed to cuase collapse from top down
---------
quote... "no explosives could have survived the plane crash
----------
explosive at levels above and below level of impact would indeed survive.
Power downs weekend before 911 are suspicious
zetetic0void 3 years ago
"explosive at levels above and below level of impact would indeed survive."
so once again i ask you, why the collapse started at the point of plane contact?
the explosive theory is wild and unfounded. its made up by a bunch of people who read a couple of articles on explosives and science and then apply them to 911. its easy to point out the flaws in the theory if you know science.
matchesison 3 years ago
Theoretically, if some party had pre-planted explosives and waited for the pre-known day when 'terrorists' would fly the planes into them, they would have it arranged so they could signal the destruction from the level of the planes' collisions to ensure the idea that the planes caused the collapses. If they had collapsed from the bottom of the buildings, there'd be obvious suspicion. Capable people could arrange the timing system (real time/computer controlled) to set off how they wanted.
zetetic0void 3 years ago
bringing me back to my original statement.
" explosives could have survived the plane crash"
so how would the explosives be detonated at the point of impact of the planes?
matchesison 3 years ago
"they would have it arranged so they could signal the destruction from the level of the planes' collisions
--------
To clarify... they would have to observe the levels of plane collisions after the collisions and then set the demolition sequences (computer controlled signal system?) based on that observation since the planes might not strike at a vertical level that could be pre-determined within accuracy.
Galileo who tested falling objects would see near free-fall speed as a problem
zetetic0void 3 years ago
The explosives theory is made partly due to Building 7 (also visual, sonic, seismic observations of WTC1 and WTC2 on that day).
Building 7 had some damage to the south side but was not hit by a plane. Visually it appeared to have few fires. The collapse was exactly straight down with the top penthouse starting to cave first. Speed of collapse was close to free-fall speed. If this building was demolition it implies pre-planted devices.
NIST and US Govt have acted in a fashion of cover up.
zetetic0void 3 years ago
One odd thing is the videos of the tower with the antena on top (WTC1 or WTC2) was very angled at start of collapse (12 -15 degrees?). Watch other videos carefully and you see top sections seem to collapse into themselves before main building sections start falling.
zetetic0void 3 years ago
I hate it when people mumble and you cannot hardly understand what they're saying even with high volume. Great video series though.
Boxcutter7 3 years ago
Call for a criminal investigation.
bobbygnosis 3 years ago 2
they just don't want to American people to know the truth. great video. the media is scared that's why you and I have to keep posting videos like this.
filmnut99 4 years ago
Google these following things. All will be answered. Remember how much opiates (poppy) plays a role in prescription drugs.
"Iran-Contra affair", "Zapata Corp", "The Bay of Pigs", "Skull and Bone's Opium trades ", "Mullah Mohammed Omar's ban on opium in 2000", "prescott bush", "Hitler's angel", "poppy yields for 2000, 2001, 2002, 2007", "PBS documentary, 'America Rebuilds'. ", "Securacom "
"Larry A. Silverstein" "Russell and Company ", "Samuel Russell",
"William Huntington Russell "
AuburnUniversity90 4 years ago
I saw a flying saucer fly up you ass! Just kidding brother.
By the way, Dogma is a mental disease. Hello illusion. baba nam kevalam
gunapie 4 years ago