1. n. A man that dips his scrotum and testicles into the mouth of another person. (as if dipping a tea bag into hot water)
Why would you be proud to have the Rich Elite dip their nuts in your mouth? I would never be a tea bagger. There is no way you could get me us to that. Most tea bag politician are sell outs to the rich elite and allow themselves to get tea bagged and what is worst they expect all of to want to get tea bagged too. Sorry but I don't like getting tea bagged.
@since1773 Your quote "The ascendency has begun..." Maybe not so much. Tea Party favorability and attendance is plummeting. Tea Party candidates are forced to charge admission to "public meetings" because of all the flak they are getting from their constituents about their obstructionism, corporatism and favoritism towards the rich. "Pay-to-play" is unconstitutional because people, rich or poor, have the right to "petition" their government and not have to pay for it. Teahadists = neo-fascists.
You would think that since the tea bag party founders didn't bother to Google 'Tea Bagger' before they named their new right wing party, they would at least have some knowledge that one slang term for male genitalia is PETER and given the guy the name Dick or something.
You would think that since the tea bag party founders didn't bother toGogglee Tea Bagger before they named their new right wing party, they would at least have some knowledge that one slang term for male genitaliaa is PETER and given the guy the name Dick or something.
Actually, the Tea Party existed long before the OBamacare stuff, it was basically hijacked by the likes of Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. And of course, none of the Tea Baggers came out when Bush signed into law the BIGGEST violation of the Constitution because it was supposedly to "protect American freedom."
Since when did protecting freedom mean tyrannic laws?
Alinski was so cocksure of his premise "there is no retort to ridicule".
So far, retort has consisted of TEA Party Patriots gleefully ripping the Statist political network apart, limb-from-limb. Calling the Media for the Lap-Dog, Malfeasant Jour-Whore-nalists the Losers they are & crashing their ratings & sales through the floor.
judyneric, you've just made my point. One protester concocted a sign reading "Te bag the liberal dems before they tea bag you;" like most Americans, she didn't know "teabagging" was gay sex slang. Certain lefties were quick with the in-jokes. The rest of America eventually got the in-jokes. "Teabagger" in politicalspeak has become a hate word on a par with the worst racial epithets. This video will only have Rachel Maddow and Anderson Cooper raising "Mission Accomplished" banners in their heads.
@Trelane574 Dummy, it was your own Teabagging Party that started calling itself the Tea Baggers. Then when you all found out it meant "balls in your mouth," you lied and said everyone was making fun of you by inventing that name. No, everyone is making fun of you because having balls in your mouth would double your IQ.
people who are proud to be teabaggers are proud to be ignorant.
teabaggers are the types of people who keep their lights on around the house when they are not using them and then whine about government waste. and they're proud of this.
teabaggers are the types of people who praise BP and Exxon for making obscene profits and then polluting our waterways with no consequence and whine about government regulations. and they're proud of this.
Yes I hate the USA SO MUCH that I want affordable health care for everyone, I want insurance companies to not deny people due to "preexisting conditions", I want homosexuals to have the same rights as others (you know.. equality??).
My God I just have so much hate! I hate so much that I want to protect the consumers by adding regulations to companies, I hate so much that I want the government to be secular! SO MUCH HATE.
@A0DBOB Listen You Zombies -You arent going to get affordable healthcare for everyone! You aren't going to get anything but World Government and a collapse of America. Follow the pied piper and drown all of you rats who betray America
'You arent going to get affordable healthcare for everyone!"
I understand that it is a pipe dream, but we can at least move TOWARDS that goal. If there are 30 million people uninsured then lets try to make that 20 million. Later down the road we can attempt to make that 10 million, etc.
I'm kind of confused about your world government comment.. so I'll let you explain that in greater detail.
I do not see how anything I've said is betraying America.
@A0DBOB - Insurance is meant to be a small payment made by individuals or companies for protection from a statistically unlikely event, not monthly doctor visits. Covering minor things is what raises premiums so high that individuals and employers can't afford it. And it's going to be worse if they're forced to cover preexisting conditions. And just to make things that much worse, regulations are so tight that there aren't enough people in the insurance pools to make it affordable.
The pre-existing conditions part is mainly targeted at health insurance companies who charge people their monthly fees... and then when the patient gets sick they DENY them coverage, and say it was a "pre-existing condition". That should be a criminal act, and thankfully the Health Care reform.. as weak and useless as it is... covers this point.
@A0DBOB Clearly you don't understand. THIS Health Care Bill doesn't fix the problem, it creates new ones and makes the old ones worse. Insurance Companies WILL go out of business leaving that oh-so-efficient Government to take over. The Regulations bill AS WRITTEN doesn't do what it needed to do. Most of us want these things in theory, but not THESE poorly written, fraud-inviting bills.
@A0DBOB - Your solutions are the problems. If you want affordable health insurance, you can't pay for preexisting conditions. And adding burdensome regulations hurts the consumer because it raises costs. Not sure what homosexuals have to do with this - unless you think they want unaffordable health insurance and more regulations just because they're gay, which would be weird...
That comment was heavily a tongue-in-cheek response to someone telling me that liberals hate America. I was covering a few of the topics I felt passionately about (health care for all, homosexual rights, consumer protections) and in no way meant they were all inter-related. Sorry for the confusion.
@CarlosDCblog Stupid comment. If you want to see real 'hate', just watch MSNBC, NBC, or read the Huffington Post. Or, just go to any left wing demonstration. Now, that's 'hate'.
@LLORT3 You *do* realize that it was the *Republicans*, led by Abraham Lincoln, who freed the slaves in the U.S.A. right? That Democrat governors put the Confederate flags atop Southern govt. buildings, and Republican governors who pulled them down?
@mondaycurse Democrats of today didn't exist 150 years ago. Everyone was a real American. Democrats of today are left wing Socialists. They don't even resemble anything American as far as I discern.
It is only consistent that we call a socialist party, "The Socialist Party". If they don't act progressive, they don't act liberal & they don't support Democracy, why support a lie?
If they act like Statists, Marxists, Fascists and Socialists, they should be referenced to as such.
I'm thinking these folks made a video with a simple message - we'd like our country back and no amount of media or politician-inspired villainization will make Tea Baggers go away.
Just look at that lady, she can barely contain her laughter. Look at how perfectly they teabagged Nanci Pelosi's face!
All the tea partiers that I know are trying to stay AWAY from being called teabaggers because they now know what it means. Why would they create a video that shows them teabagging?
That's the point of the video. It shows normal people going about their lives, tired of being called sexual euphemisms, then embracing the title and going "you know what, screw you."
1) one who carries large bags of packaged tea for shipment. 2) a man that squats on top of a womens face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" 3) one who has a job or talent that is low in social status 4) a person who is unaware that they have said or done something foolish, childlike, noobish, lame, or inconvenient. 5) also see "fagbag", "lamer", "noob"
The renaissance of the Tea Party... since 2007. --> Exposing the statism of both the Demopublicans and Republocrats and promoting the restoration of the Constitution.
In Columbia Missouri, gradeschool administrators were appauled when they received school supplies, with the Obama logo stamped on them. They were returned to the supplier and new supplies were sent, without the logo!
The truth is there are no one that isnt self serving in our goverment, Both are wrong the healthcare issue was half assed the Dem screwed up an easy thing the republicans are not real republic benefactor. They where the party of the enviroment and progress long before the dems came away from the rooster party. And now they cant hear a thing we are saying and now crackpots begin the tea party great idea bad ideology ,xenophobs and un lettered.
Indians speak urdu. I know because several of my college buddies are indian. Other people may speak it too, what's your point? President bush never left US soil until he became president, yet he's suppose to be more informed about other cultures and international policy? 2/3rd of this country do not have a passport. The xenophobia in certain parts of America is very apparent and I've seen it with my own eyes. Trust me there's lots of stupid out there.
@towerclimber37 Seriously? You honestly need to study the Federal government a little bit more. Hint, NECESSARY AND PROPER (Elastic Clause) Do some research for yourself bro, you look like a simpleton on here.
Answer me this... What was the point of going to Iraq when Al Qaeda was based in Afghanistan? And what was the function of the Iraqi war? Was it to find WMD? Was it to Dethrone Saddam? Or was it to liberate the iraqi citizens? Or was it to increase oil supplies for trade to the US? Those reasons have been circumvented over and over again, with no straight answer. And there's plenty of more evil dictators who commit genocide in Africa? Why are we not invading them?
@pvd021 , Has there been an increase in oil supplies from Iraq? Why aren't we drilling our own oil? We have huge quantities that have not been tapped. New technology in drilling, makes minimal impact to environment. We should be self more sufficient. (Maybe our reserves belong to China, now?)
Seriously.... Lets not get into appointments and scandals. Bush's cabinet was like a rotating door, the amount of scandals that took place during his presidency is just way too numerous to even list. You're using a single statement from a blown up story to paint his him and his entire branch to be less than 'professional' Lets be adults here, and you know you don't want to go down the LONG list of names and various scandals during Bush's term.
Well if you guys were up in arms, you were pretty much overshadowed by many Republicans who would call you and many others traitors for questioning the decision of Bush to 'protect America'
@towerclimber37 Oh and name me EXACTLY what Obama has done to violate the Constitution. And don't say passing Healthcare. That was passed by Congress, signed by the President. If the courts weigh in, then that is WITHIN the Constitutional system. So what exactly is not Constitutional? Is it that he won the election, is that UnConstitutional? Or that he has Center/Left ideas? Is that it? What??? What compared to torture, wiretapping and suspending Habeus Corpus (from the last pres)?
@towerclimber37 How many "underhanded, partisan tactics" do you think it took to buy off the Republican caucus to vote NO en masse? How many back room deals with Insurance companies did that take. You only talk about the Dems warts because we were out front trying to do something. GOP just hiding in the back criticizing. When you had the Govt for 8 Years you did NOTHING! What did you do but spend us a 1.5 Trillion deficits.... At least Obama spends the cash here and for The Good USA!
@towerclimber37 Buddy think a bit before posting. I am from Massachusetts have family there. Healthcare in Mass is no failure 96% of us are covered and NO ONE in Mass wants to get rid of it. And Healthcare in Mass was created by Mitt Romney, our former 1 term Gov, who happens to be the lead contender of Republican nom for President in 2012.... Healthcare is a winner my friend, it worked for Mitt, it's working for Obama too. Again HCR NOT for poor people stop saying that. That's Medicaid!
@towerclimber37 And regarding the "84 ideas" (Wow you are a wonk) that Repubs may have presented, be clear that Obama put SEVERAL of them in, he is specifically bragged about that point. he put in Coburn's (R-Oaklahoma) idea to have undercover agents looking for waste in the system, and he put in "Buying Insurance Cross State Borders," in fact Bob Dole grandady of GOP said he would vote for this bill. Now lets add in America's favorite... a Public Option! HCR will help you and your family.
@towerclimber37 See this is a false assumption you make that somehow I, or other Dems and Liberals or Progressives "Don't Work." We work damn hard as you and pay taxes like you too. Nothing in this Healthcare bill is for people who "Don't Work." We already have FREE Healthcare for Poor people in the country that's called Medicaid from 1964. The HCR Bill that passed was so that WORKING PEOPLE can get care deserved them and their families without discrimination or losing it when they lose jobs
@dankusking We voice our opinions on this blog page and many others. It's called "cut and paste" but you would be far to dumb to understand that concept.... go back to playing Wii Golf and GET OUTTA HERE YA BIG DOPE!!
@towerclimber37 Remember that Obama and the Dems were elected, and not accidentally or by a razor slim margin of 537 votes in one state. But by 9 million votes, 53%. So they have a right to govern on what they campaigned on. And that damn sure was Healthcare and Financial Reform. Sorry, but the election was not about Joe the Plumber. So they are not Gangters or UnAmerican. You don't like them you vote Republican. Your side gives me NOTHING to vote for. What's the "NO Socialism" plan?
@towerclimber37 Well listen you can't eat the Constitution, or use it to pay your mortgage or your bills. You have a right to disagree but not be disagreeable. Like Michelle Bachman calling Dems a "Gangster Government" is unacceptable. She is, in fact, the one being UnAmerican. Your side doesn't want to seem to solve the complex problems we face. Repubs want to just play politics and win and make Obama look bad. And screaming about "Freedom and Liberty" doesn't really solve or do anything.
@ajcatoline So what's your position on all the leftist politicians calling bush evil and his administration a "regime" over the past 8 years? Why is calling the democrats mean names "unacceptable"? Right wingers are called all kinds of names, notably "tea baggers" which is derogatory sexual slang, yets its "unamerican" to call the democrats gangsters when thats exactly what obama, emmanual, axelrod are, do you know nothing of chicago politics? And are you such a pussy you cry over mean names?
@heatsketch Sestak was wrong to say, BUT he was using the word about a past not sitting Pres, and not with Vitriol or hate in his voice. YOU use to imply Obama is illegitimate. And there is no case for that. We challenged Bush on legitimacy yes, but after Hanging Chads and Supreme Court intervention and Bush's strutting despite a 537 vote "mandate." That criticism was legit. It's not against Obama who is governs like he said he would and HE WON. You have to deal with it till next election.
@ajcatoline So it goes from no dem has said that to "it wasnt about a sitting president" lol
yes we have to deal with it until next election, so see what happens in november, obama has broken most of his campaign promises, and if you can't see that the health care reform WAS both unconstitutional and against the wishes of the majority you are a lost cause, a hopeless statist shill. the dems have seven months, obama has 2.5 years
@heatsketch WOW you are UNGOVERNABLE if you hate both Bush and Obama Admins. Name One Thing Obama has done "against the Constitution." and don't say passing Healthcare, cause that whole process (assuming the Courts weigh in which they won't) that's all how laws made that's WITHIN The Constitution. So what has Obama done that is illegal exactly? Other than winning, being a centrist/liberal and being of course the first black president? haha
@ajcatoline hmm all his czars are unconsitutional, he supports the fed and the wider drug war which are unconstitutional, hes continuing the patriot act which is unconstitutional (all of these bush did as well)
Yeah right, like the term tea bagger came from that... lololo TEA BAGGER IS DROPPING YOUR BALLS INTO SOMEONES MOUTH... exactly what republicans wanted obama to do, to suck their balls. Now go explain that to republican kids...
as if teabaggers are the only ones who believe in the constitution. ba-ha! only people with COMMON SENSE can see the dirty lies of this party and scare tacs. they stand for the consitution or they stand for pursuing rich, white folk interests?! go ahead and remember in november because reality check-you're not the only ones who vote. see you at the polls!
@towerclimber37 Surely you're not arguing that every specific thing the federal government does must be specifically enumerated in the Constitution? B-b-b-b-but how do they use teh interwebs then? Der was no interwebs in 1787! OH NOES!
@towerclimber37 It's not that I don't like it more than there's very little sense to it. It's actually kind of funny. Very funny. Actually it's hilarious. It's like you guys tried to be like langston hughes's "I am a negro - and beautiful" but instead you used the term of a sex offender. Definitely fits you guys.
I saw several neocon/teabagger blogs claiming this to be 'really funny'. So yeah, us liberals associate really funny with people like Bruce and Carlin and while I wasn't expecting comic genius, this was about as funny as the owner's manual for a '93 Hyundai. Hell, even Hannity and Beck and Limbaugh are funny and multiple divorcee Newt Gingrich lecturing on 'family values' is pure comic gold, even though it's far from intentional. This- not so much.
@towerclimber37 Because breitbart is such a bastion of honesty and journalistic integrity. Remind me where James O'Keefe is. . .
When I say proof, give me something from some source I can believe, even a conservative source, like the Wall Street Journal, or The Economist, somewhere they have standards.
@towerclimber37 OMG, two black guys are standing outside my polling station talking to no one except the idiots with cameras asking them questions, I"m soooooo intimidated.
@towerclimber37 I'm sorry, do you consider someone that takes out a mortgage, broke? Do you consider someone that has a car loan broke? What about business that is leveraged in order to make infrastructure investment, are they broke? Almost every new business is in debt when it starts, are they bankrupt? You have no sense of finance or economics and you need to stop talking about it until you educate yourself.
Wow, how lame. I know Tea Baggers who swore this was great comedy and I loaded it up, expecting something along the lines of Lenny Bruce or George Carlin, but instead got... this. Why am I not surprised?
So the Tea Baggers you knew claimed that this was on par with Lenny Bruce or George Carlin? Or are you just a moron who expects a political ad to be on the same level as the greatest comedians of all time?
@heatsketch Elected Democrats never used "Regime" to define Bush, or any Treasonous language. They criticized him sure, but an elected official like Bachman saying the US Govt she serves in is "gangster" is Treason and out of bounds. Calling Obama a "Regime" started with the big dumb Walrus Limbaugh, a slob with no responsibility... "regime" is disrespecting the 63.25 million Americans who voted for President Obama and disrespectful to the USA and Constitution you claim to love. DON'T SAY IT.
@ajcatoline Again "Regime" came from "Regime Change" referring to Sadaam Hussein and the unnecessary invasion of Iraq which the govt spent 1 Trillion of which 400 Billion is unacounted for... gone missing. Where was Tea Party then? Sure protestors said "Regime Change Begins at Home" referring to Bush and wanting another election. But elected officials like Bachman need to watch their mouths they are not cheerleaders like she was in HIgh School. She's a damn Congresswoman -- act like it.
@ajcatoline "Elected Democrats never used "Regime" to define Bush"
Oh really?
(January 2010) Democrat Rep. Joe Sestak: In George Bushs regime, only one million jobs had been created"
Democrats called Bush's administration a regime for 8 years. I didn't disagree with them. But they are hypocrites. They aren't against crushing statism, they just want it done their way (they want it to be "fair")
@ajcatoline and remember elected democrat Alan Grayson saying that Republicans want sick people to die quickly so they can make more money?
If I dug around for a while, I'm sure I could find more. But of course it only matters when Obama gets insulted.
Here it is: Obama is a tyrant. His administration contains nothing but thugs (Rahm Emmanual is as evil as Rove and Cheney, if not more so), hes practicing economic fascism, and hes going against both the will of the people and the constitution
You're not proud or you wouldn't have made it so obvious you were trying to get people of color and those with accents in there. Is it just the most horrid thing in the world for white people to stand up for the country their ancestors built? Even for people on the right?
@ShaytanBozorg I don't think that old lady counts as someone "with an accent", considering she has the accent of a German or other European immigrant. Not exactly the type of immigrant that affirmative action was created for...
@heatsketch, same difference. That's the difference and you know it as well as I do. They're using political correctness, a black, a white, an accent, etc. Our entire lives are filled with it. Just like parading Jindal, Steele and Palin around -- the conservatives have become liberals and are using liberal ploys. It's sickening. They are dignifying and trying to defend against the accusations the liberals are throwing out.
The govt mandated that the mechanic's employer issue him safety gear while doing his job, that the dental hygienist finish a specified amount of school, certificates, and practicum hours, ensuring protection for the patient, and that the BAGS of tea themselves are appropriately labeled, quantitatively measured and inspected by the FDA prior to public consumption....
These guys are all protected by government laws and reforms, but yet they're PROUD small govt advocating teabaggers. MORONS.
@pvd021 , small government, not NO government. Our founding fathers subscribed to the idea that man is self serving and needs the guidance of law. That is why we have a constitution and that is the most important concern of the Tea Party members. We want our leaders to follow the constitution. It is the only way to guarantee the rights and freedom for ALL Americans.
Define small govt. As I see it, lots of teabaggers prefer deregulation, and little big brother influence in terms of conducting of business and way of life. What you might consider small, may still be considered big government from your very own members. What I don't understand is why this teaparty movement wasn't formed when Bush Jr. passed the Patriot act or created guantanimo bay. This movement only surfaced once Obama was in power and inherited Bush's stupidity?
@pvd021, Why didn't YOU form a Tea Party, when G.W. passed the Patriot act? Why aren't YOU a part of a movement, to stop the radical government takeover of private business and the disregard for our constitutional rights? It's much easier to sit in comfort and ridicule others, than to inform ones self in defense of our the fundamental spirit of our constitution.
You're deflecting my question with a question without actually answering anything. I don't form movements, because I don't share the same beliefs as you or your movement. SIMPLY, I don't think this current government is radical, nor do i believe that they infringe, for the most part, on my rights. But obviously you feel different, so my question remains, why are you guys up in arms NOW, but not up in ARMS when Bush Jr. passed the patriot act and set up Guantanamo Bay? Why now?
@pvd021 You don't think this government is radical, but you are against bush, but Obama has been quietly adopting Bushs policies, in Education, he plays the same line on the drug war and gay marriage, he hasn't repealed the patriot act, he has expanded the WoT to Yemen and Pakistan, without ending it in Iraq, he hasn't closed Gitmo yet and is now rethinking it (the statements of Eric Holder not withstanding).. so how can you oppose Bush but not Obama when it comes to liberties?
I oppose the Patriot Act, I oppose Guantanimo bay, and withholding these people's right to due process. I'm against BUSH moreso than Obama, because Bush created it. Obama inherited this. I was always against the War in Iraq, since it was very obvious that ALOT of Americans are culturally ignorant, and cannot distinguish between an Iraqi from an Afghani citizen. Obama, is not in anyway flawless, and has much to FIX in this country, but lets be honest, BUSH Jr. created this complete mess.
Also, Obama doesn't play the same line on education, which btw is a socialist program. Bush created the No child left behind act, which by majority of educators is a disaster of a program. Obama, told all states attorney to not pursue marijuana dispensaries or medicinal users. VERY opposite of bush. He just recently advocated equal rights for gays in terms of coverage. So I don't know what you're seeing but Obama and bush are VERY different, its insane to think they're the same.
@pvd021, I did not form this movement, I became a part of it. I can not answer for the inception of this movement. You want to know why the Tea Party did not object to the Bush administration, but say nothing about the continuation of the policies started under Bush.... The Patriot Act COULD have been rescinded last month, but this administration voted to keep it, so why aren't you objecting?
Who said I didn't object? I object to the Patriot act whole heartedly. I could care less who's side of the aisle you're on. The Patriot Act goes against every American value of law. But like I said, it seems like this group is more pissed off at Obama, who's only been in office for not even 2 years, than President Bush, who not only pushed this law into play but supported for his entire presidency since his inception.
@pvd021, Many Americans have been informed and more have become aware of the Radical Marxist background of Obama and the people he has placed within his administration. We don't agree with the idea that our country needs to be "fundamentally, transformed." We are disgusted with the elitism of both parties, wihin our government and the way our constitution is being disregarded.
@Themixedtwits, you have no idea.... and where the hell were you? Were you marching in the streets? I didn't hear anyone call YOU dirty names, for exercising your 1st amendment rights. I didn't here "YOU GUYS" protest when YOUR MAJORITY congress signed the Patriot Act. Did YOU object to YOUR majority congress, when they recently, made the Patriot Act PERMANENT? I guess THAT was "totally OKAY" with YOU.
What I find really objectionable is that since the BEGINNING of the Patriot Act becoming law, and for its prevalence for the last x years, there didn't seem to be much rebuke or protest coming from Republicans, but yet as soon as Barack steps into power, all these people go completely nuts for something that has been in existence YEARS before he became POTUS. YEARS. And then they are upset as to why he didn't rescind it. I'm upset about that too? But i didn't see this ? being asked of BUSH.
@pvd021 what are you talking about? Ron Paul's campaign started WELL before Obama took power, WELL before the republican primaries. The REAL republicans care, the fake ones that have infected the republican party don't, they are corporate sponsors.
This argument of "Bush sucked so whatever" has got to stop... lets get real people.. BUSH fucked this country in the ass for eight goddamn years and I'm supposed to forget about it while you shit on my president who's CLEANING UP THE GODDAMN MESS YOU REPUBLICAN IDIOTS MADE. Don't lecture us on deficits Democrats ALWAYS clean up the mess YOUR party makes.
@thewritt , We must realize that this isn't about Bush vs Obama, or Republican vs Democrat. For nearly, 250 years, our Republic has balanced between the two political parties, but other factions and political ideologies have infiltrated both parties and are destroying our fundamental values, from within. The Tea Party members want our constitution restored and the criminal element cleaned OUT of our government and that goes for the corruption of BOTH parties.
W's presidency saw once long slow economic slide followed by the BIGGEST GIGANTIC CRASH IN HISTORY!!! Blame that on the terrorists better yet call me un-american so I'll shut up. W went and charged every dime he spent to CHINA. DON'T LECTURE DEMOCRATS ON F'IN DEFICITS!!! YOU F'IN HYPOCRITES!!!
@thewritt ummm, bush sucked, so what ever Obama is doing is what Bush did but worse so you are a fuckign retard. You are the hypocrit fucking fuck face. Go suck opbama's man/wife's dick ass wipe come up with a real argument
2000-2008: Corporations avoided taxes, not working Americans. -Working Americans saw their taxes increased by 6 years of "conservative" control. Dont lecture democrats about the f''in deficit. We already balanced the budget once... a lot of thanks CLINTON got for that. W took 90 billion dollars of surplus and GAVE IT TO HIS RICH CRONIES WITH TAX CUT. Hell of a lot of good that did curbing their creed.
@towerclimber37 No, it isn't that simple. There actually is a social security fund, and that's the reason we're still paying out full benefits to retirees. Money "raided" from the social security fund is lent to the government through Treasury bills and bonds. So unless we're planning to default on our debt, social security is fine for at least another 30 years before the Social Security fund is depleted.
MY idea of the Constitution???? What the hell do you know about what I THINK? You dont' know anything about me. Are you psychic?
This is exactly what I'm talking about. Teabaggers jumping to conclusions, attributing thoughts and feelings to others based on fantasy, and judging others based on NO FACTS, NO INFORMATION. Just judge, react, condemn and repeat.
Teabagger
1. n. A man that dips his scrotum and testicles into the mouth of another person. (as if dipping a tea bag into hot water)
Why would you be proud to have the Rich Elite dip their nuts in your mouth? I would never be a tea bagger. There is no way you could get me us to that. Most tea bag politician are sell outs to the rich elite and allow themselves to get tea bagged and what is worst they expect all of to want to get tea bagged too. Sorry but I don't like getting tea bagged.
jamice4u 2 months ago
We Are Coming. :-D
LaurietheGrammy 5 months ago
@since1773 Your quote "The ascendency has begun..." Maybe not so much. Tea Party favorability and attendance is plummeting. Tea Party candidates are forced to charge admission to "public meetings" because of all the flak they are getting from their constituents about their obstructionism, corporatism and favoritism towards the rich. "Pay-to-play" is unconstitutional because people, rich or poor, have the right to "petition" their government and not have to pay for it. Teahadists = neo-fascists.
SenseOfRumor 6 months ago 11
@SenseOfRumor Then you have nothing to worry about.
JimTreacher 5 months ago
You would think that since the tea bag party founders didn't bother to Google 'Tea Bagger' before they named their new right wing party, they would at least have some knowledge that one slang term for male genitalia is PETER and given the guy the name Dick or something.
Gawd, what a bunch of idiots.
biminitwst 6 months ago
One of the stars is named Peter in the video.
You would think that since the tea bag party founders didn't bother toGogglee Tea Bagger before they named their new right wing party, they would at least have some knowledge that one slang term for male genitaliaa is PETER and given the guy the name Dick or something.
Gawd, what a bunch of idiots.
biminitwst 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SindeeCD So You Want The New World Order? Who is The Idiot! ?
prickleepete 1 year ago
Teabaggers are just the same, tired old republitard liars. Hopefully they do what Ross Perot did and split the Neanderthal vote.
xjlmt 1 year ago 2
You shouldn't be, you white trash sons of bitches.
mistaspot1 1 year ago 2
remember the original tea party was an act of vandalism against the big business
nsdtr01 1 year ago
@nsdtr01 Big business is who's responsible for the condition of our country.
MrSafetymeeting 1 year ago 2
Actually, the Tea Party existed long before the OBamacare stuff, it was basically hijacked by the likes of Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. And of course, none of the Tea Baggers came out when Bush signed into law the BIGGEST violation of the Constitution because it was supposedly to "protect American freedom."
Since when did protecting freedom mean tyrannic laws?
VirusofLife182 1 year ago
THIS IS THE FUNNIEST SHIT EVER
exaurius 1 year ago 4
Alinski was so cocksure of his premise "there is no retort to ridicule".
So far, retort has consisted of TEA Party Patriots gleefully ripping the Statist political network apart, limb-from-limb. Calling the Media for the Lap-Dog, Malfeasant Jour-Whore-nalists the Losers they are & crashing their ratings & sales through the floor.
How's that for retort, Saul the Red?
tutorturtle 1 year ago
This cracks me up every time I watch it.
Keep on Teabagging!
reyobmekim 1 year ago
Oh a "Tea party", with little fancy cakes and tarts.
Matrix29bear 1 year ago
judyneric, you've just made my point. One protester concocted a sign reading "Te bag the liberal dems before they tea bag you;" like most Americans, she didn't know "teabagging" was gay sex slang. Certain lefties were quick with the in-jokes. The rest of America eventually got the in-jokes. "Teabagger" in politicalspeak has become a hate word on a par with the worst racial epithets. This video will only have Rachel Maddow and Anderson Cooper raising "Mission Accomplished" banners in their heads.
Trelane574 1 year ago
@Trelane574 It is ridicule Jujitsu. Use the ridicule against itself, turn it around and embrace it, it then loses the power to hurt you.
Maddow and Cooper are clueless, the tide has already turned.
tutorturtle 1 year ago
This looks and sounds like a parody... Fail.
RICKDAVE1956 1 year ago 2
OPEN WIDE, OBAMA!!
Rich711 1 year ago
Don't encourage the liberals, you idiot Breitbart! I will NOT use THEIR bigoted slurs to define the Tea Party movement!!!
Trelane574 1 year ago
@Trelane574 Dummy, it was your own Teabagging Party that started calling itself the Tea Baggers. Then when you all found out it meant "balls in your mouth," you lied and said everyone was making fun of you by inventing that name. No, everyone is making fun of you because having balls in your mouth would double your IQ.
judyneric 1 year ago
people who are proud to be teabaggers are proud to be ignorant.
teabaggers are the types of people who keep their lights on around the house when they are not using them and then whine about government waste. and they're proud of this.
teabaggers are the types of people who praise BP and Exxon for making obscene profits and then polluting our waterways with no consequence and whine about government regulations. and they're proud of this.
i'm proud i'm NOT a teabagger.
LLORT3 1 year ago
lol, this is too good. BRILLIANT parody.
AbbathGS 1 year ago 2
This is parody right?
Seriously, the people running around calling Democrats "Nazis" are the last people who should whining about being called names.
ahermit 1 year ago 11
@ahermit
I am 99% sure that its a parody... but with these people you really can't tell.
A0DBOB 1 year ago
Do you realize that dumb ass liberal hate the USA
heyazzhole 1 year ago
@heyazzhole
Yes I hate the USA SO MUCH that I want affordable health care for everyone, I want insurance companies to not deny people due to "preexisting conditions", I want homosexuals to have the same rights as others (you know.. equality??).
My God I just have so much hate! I hate so much that I want to protect the consumers by adding regulations to companies, I hate so much that I want the government to be secular! SO MUCH HATE.
A0DBOB 1 year ago 5
@A0DBOB Listen You Zombies -You arent going to get affordable healthcare for everyone! You aren't going to get anything but World Government and a collapse of America. Follow the pied piper and drown all of you rats who betray America
prickleepete 1 year ago
@prickleepete
'You arent going to get affordable healthcare for everyone!"
I understand that it is a pipe dream, but we can at least move TOWARDS that goal. If there are 30 million people uninsured then lets try to make that 20 million. Later down the road we can attempt to make that 10 million, etc.
I'm kind of confused about your world government comment.. so I'll let you explain that in greater detail.
I do not see how anything I've said is betraying America.
A0DBOB 1 year ago
@A0DBOB - Insurance is meant to be a small payment made by individuals or companies for protection from a statistically unlikely event, not monthly doctor visits. Covering minor things is what raises premiums so high that individuals and employers can't afford it. And it's going to be worse if they're forced to cover preexisting conditions. And just to make things that much worse, regulations are so tight that there aren't enough people in the insurance pools to make it affordable.
jethroc 5 months ago
@jethroc
The pre-existing conditions part is mainly targeted at health insurance companies who charge people their monthly fees... and then when the patient gets sick they DENY them coverage, and say it was a "pre-existing condition". That should be a criminal act, and thankfully the Health Care reform.. as weak and useless as it is... covers this point.
A0DBOB 5 months ago
@prickleepete
Unless of course my "secular" government comment makes me a traitor... but I have more faith in you than that.
A0DBOB 1 year ago
@A0DBOB Clearly you don't understand. THIS Health Care Bill doesn't fix the problem, it creates new ones and makes the old ones worse. Insurance Companies WILL go out of business leaving that oh-so-efficient Government to take over. The Regulations bill AS WRITTEN doesn't do what it needed to do. Most of us want these things in theory, but not THESE poorly written, fraud-inviting bills.
I'm with you regarding equality for gays.......
chuckle2010 1 year ago
@A0DBOB - Your solutions are the problems. If you want affordable health insurance, you can't pay for preexisting conditions. And adding burdensome regulations hurts the consumer because it raises costs. Not sure what homosexuals have to do with this - unless you think they want unaffordable health insurance and more regulations just because they're gay, which would be weird...
jethroc 5 months ago
@jethroc
That comment was heavily a tongue-in-cheek response to someone telling me that liberals hate America. I was covering a few of the topics I felt passionately about (health care for all, homosexual rights, consumer protections) and in no way meant they were all inter-related. Sorry for the confusion.
A0DBOB 5 months ago
Tea Baggers Will Bag (Take Over) Congress Soon!!!
3martijns 1 year ago
Republicans and their hate...
CarlosDCblog 1 year ago
@CarlosDCblog Stupid comment. If you want to see real 'hate', just watch MSNBC, NBC, or read the Huffington Post. Or, just go to any left wing demonstration. Now, that's 'hate'.
tinydancer1965 1 year ago
Thank you for being a Patriot. In Liberty!
ReadYourTaxBill 1 year ago
The NEGATIVE sexual connotation is only in THEIR childish depraved sick minds! LEFTY GROW UP!
tedm82 1 year ago
good luck, bigots.
sexdrgsndordonez 1 year ago
@towerclimber37
damn liberals, freeing the slaves and such.
LLORT3 1 year ago
@LLORT3 You *do* realize that it was the *Republicans*, led by Abraham Lincoln, who freed the slaves in the U.S.A. right? That Democrat governors put the Confederate flags atop Southern govt. buildings, and Republican governors who pulled them down?
tfraymond 1 year ago 3
@tfraymond
exactly, they were a bunch of liberals back then
thankfully the GOP has wised up and kicked out the libs from our party. NO MORE RINOS!
LLORT3 1 year ago
@tfraymond
You *do* realize that he said "liberals" and not "democrats" or "republicans"?
You *do* realize that Republicans used to be "classical liberals", but have since strayed away from that?
A0DBOB 1 year ago
@tfraymond
You missed the fact that democrats and republicans of today are almost complete opposites in viewpoints as they were 150 years ago.
mondaycurse 1 year ago
@mondaycurse Democrats of today didn't exist 150 years ago. Everyone was a real American. Democrats of today are left wing Socialists. They don't even resemble anything American as far as I discern.
tinydancer1965 1 year ago
@tinydancer1965 Good point.
It is only consistent that we call a socialist party, "The Socialist Party". If they don't act progressive, they don't act liberal & they don't support Democracy, why support a lie?
If they act like Statists, Marxists, Fascists and Socialists, they should be referenced to as such.
tutorturtle 1 year ago
@LLORT3 LOL you should check your facts before making such an ignorant comment.
saxxtreme 1 year ago
@saxxtreme
come on, the RINOs who helped the slaves were progressives
LLORT3 1 year ago
Count me in, cuz Nancy is out.
irisojects 1 year ago
This is great!! Yeah, I'm proud!!
ginhay2003 1 year ago
I'm thinking these folks made a video with a simple message - we'd like our country back and no amount of media or politician-inspired villainization will make Tea Baggers go away.
November 2010 - here we come!
Tarreffic 1 year ago 4
@Tarreffic Um, you didn't realize the video was a parody/satire? It is making fun of the TEA party.
A0DBOB 1 year ago
@A0DBOB ... no it's using the insult that MSNBC made up for the Tea Party that was sexually crude, and used it against them.
joncmaxwell 1 year ago
@joncmaxwell I would like to see a citation of anyone on MSNBC using the term "teabaggers" before Fox News did.
On a side note, I enjoy the fake outrage at being called a name that you all ascribed to yourselves.
cancerati 1 year ago 3
@cancerati ... as if you watch Fox News....
joncmaxwell 1 year ago
@joncmaxwell i also don't think cancerati watches fox news. his/her comment was far too well-written to have been scribed by a fox news viewer.
judyneric 1 year ago
@A0DBOB
No it's not.
TheMinskyTerrorist 1 year ago
@TheMinskyTerrorist
Just look at that lady, she can barely contain her laughter. Look at how perfectly they teabagged Nanci Pelosi's face!
All the tea partiers that I know are trying to stay AWAY from being called teabaggers because they now know what it means. Why would they create a video that shows them teabagging?
A0DBOB 1 year ago
@A0DBOB
That's the point of the video. It shows normal people going about their lives, tired of being called sexual euphemisms, then embracing the title and going "you know what, screw you."
TheMinskyTerrorist 1 year ago
@A0DBOB Maybe, just maybe, tea party supporters don't give a fig what Liberals think of them. Just maybe.
tinydancer1965 1 year ago
@Tarreffic lol exactly, the corrupt politicians are the ones about to get teabagged
exaurius 1 year ago
@Tarreffic -- You lost an election, grow the fuck up.
1noen1 1 year ago
@1noen1 We've ALL lost our liberty AND security under Bush and ObaMao.
yakyakyak69 1 year ago
Love this video!!!
Raughwe 1 year ago
Sorry but I'm a tea party patriot and goer but not a tea bagger
liztrot 1 year ago
1) one who carries large bags of packaged tea for shipment. 2) a man that squats on top of a womens face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" 3) one who has a job or talent that is low in social status 4) a person who is unaware that they have said or done something foolish, childlike, noobish, lame, or inconvenient. 5) also see "fagbag", "lamer", "noob"
acquiescere9 1 year ago
AWESOME Love it !
TheGuyFromZhills 1 year ago
Great video.
SkepticAll 1 year ago
The renaissance of the Tea Party... since 2007. --> Exposing the statism of both the Demopublicans and Republocrats and promoting the restoration of the Constitution.
Parisjune 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 , mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack Hussein Obama!
In Columbia Missouri, gradeschool administrators were appauled when they received school supplies, with the Obama logo stamped on them. They were returned to the supplier and new supplies were sent, without the logo!
cowgirlmoon 1 year ago
The truth is there are no one that isnt self serving in our goverment, Both are wrong the healthcare issue was half assed the Dem screwed up an easy thing the republicans are not real republic benefactor. They where the party of the enviroment and progress long before the dems came away from the rooster party. And now they cant hear a thing we are saying and now crackpots begin the tea party great idea bad ideology ,xenophobs and un lettered.
nakedfeet 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 Whatever floats your boat, friend.
lingojac 1 year ago
Indians speak urdu. I know because several of my college buddies are indian. Other people may speak it too, what's your point? President bush never left US soil until he became president, yet he's suppose to be more informed about other cultures and international policy? 2/3rd of this country do not have a passport. The xenophobia in certain parts of America is very apparent and I've seen it with my own eyes. Trust me there's lots of stupid out there.
pvd021 1 year ago
ur proud you put ur nuts on the back of someones neck?
SamanthaUnicorn 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 Seriously? You honestly need to study the Federal government a little bit more. Hint, NECESSARY AND PROPER (Elastic Clause) Do some research for yourself bro, you look like a simpleton on here.
percymate 1 year ago
Yawn.
Stamm32089 1 year ago
Answer me this... What was the point of going to Iraq when Al Qaeda was based in Afghanistan? And what was the function of the Iraqi war? Was it to find WMD? Was it to Dethrone Saddam? Or was it to liberate the iraqi citizens? Or was it to increase oil supplies for trade to the US? Those reasons have been circumvented over and over again, with no straight answer. And there's plenty of more evil dictators who commit genocide in Africa? Why are we not invading them?
pvd021 1 year ago
@pvd021 , Has there been an increase in oil supplies from Iraq? Why aren't we drilling our own oil? We have huge quantities that have not been tapped. New technology in drilling, makes minimal impact to environment. We should be self more sufficient. (Maybe our reserves belong to China, now?)
cowgirlmoon 1 year ago
Seriously.... Lets not get into appointments and scandals. Bush's cabinet was like a rotating door, the amount of scandals that took place during his presidency is just way too numerous to even list. You're using a single statement from a blown up story to paint his him and his entire branch to be less than 'professional' Lets be adults here, and you know you don't want to go down the LONG list of names and various scandals during Bush's term.
pvd021 1 year ago
Well if you guys were up in arms, you were pretty much overshadowed by many Republicans who would call you and many others traitors for questioning the decision of Bush to 'protect America'
pvd021 1 year ago
THIS IS DUMB. It makes it look like every Tea Party member is a FOXTARD, which is mostly untrue!!!!
Yargarogoo 1 year ago
Now I know why I do not drink tea
meredithcoston 1 year ago
More like D-BAGGERS
Tvor1128 1 year ago
FAKE AND GAY
Tvor1128 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 Oh and name me EXACTLY what Obama has done to violate the Constitution. And don't say passing Healthcare. That was passed by Congress, signed by the President. If the courts weigh in, then that is WITHIN the Constitutional system. So what exactly is not Constitutional? Is it that he won the election, is that UnConstitutional? Or that he has Center/Left ideas? Is that it? What??? What compared to torture, wiretapping and suspending Habeus Corpus (from the last pres)?
ajcatoline 1 year ago
Chocolate is awesome!
zyontheking 1 year ago 2
So is this video supporting or sarcastically dissing the tea party movement? I'm confused, it could go either way.
zafaroxide 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 How many "underhanded, partisan tactics" do you think it took to buy off the Republican caucus to vote NO en masse? How many back room deals with Insurance companies did that take. You only talk about the Dems warts because we were out front trying to do something. GOP just hiding in the back criticizing. When you had the Govt for 8 Years you did NOTHING! What did you do but spend us a 1.5 Trillion deficits.... At least Obama spends the cash here and for The Good USA!
ajcatoline 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 Buddy think a bit before posting. I am from Massachusetts have family there. Healthcare in Mass is no failure 96% of us are covered and NO ONE in Mass wants to get rid of it. And Healthcare in Mass was created by Mitt Romney, our former 1 term Gov, who happens to be the lead contender of Republican nom for President in 2012.... Healthcare is a winner my friend, it worked for Mitt, it's working for Obama too. Again HCR NOT for poor people stop saying that. That's Medicaid!
ajcatoline 1 year ago
Making the bill even more unpopular certainly would help the GOP this November even more. Thanks for the suggestion, even if you are a bit late.
bobwaters 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 And regarding the "84 ideas" (Wow you are a wonk) that Repubs may have presented, be clear that Obama put SEVERAL of them in, he is specifically bragged about that point. he put in Coburn's (R-Oaklahoma) idea to have undercover agents looking for waste in the system, and he put in "Buying Insurance Cross State Borders," in fact Bob Dole grandady of GOP said he would vote for this bill. Now lets add in America's favorite... a Public Option! HCR will help you and your family.
ajcatoline 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 See this is a false assumption you make that somehow I, or other Dems and Liberals or Progressives "Don't Work." We work damn hard as you and pay taxes like you too. Nothing in this Healthcare bill is for people who "Don't Work." We already have FREE Healthcare for Poor people in the country that's called Medicaid from 1964. The HCR Bill that passed was so that WORKING PEOPLE can get care deserved them and their families without discrimination or losing it when they lose jobs
ajcatoline 1 year ago
Hahaha all these faggots trying to voice their opinions in the comments section of some video. Ah, YouTube, making people think they have a voice!
dankusking 1 year ago
@dankusking We voice our opinions on this blog page and many others. It's called "cut and paste" but you would be far to dumb to understand that concept.... go back to playing Wii Golf and GET OUTTA HERE YA BIG DOPE!!
ajcatoline 1 year ago
@ajcatoline Haha you defended your right to post your opinion!! Who does that?!?!
dankusking 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 Remember that Obama and the Dems were elected, and not accidentally or by a razor slim margin of 537 votes in one state. But by 9 million votes, 53%. So they have a right to govern on what they campaigned on. And that damn sure was Healthcare and Financial Reform. Sorry, but the election was not about Joe the Plumber. So they are not Gangters or UnAmerican. You don't like them you vote Republican. Your side gives me NOTHING to vote for. What's the "NO Socialism" plan?
ajcatoline 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 Well listen you can't eat the Constitution, or use it to pay your mortgage or your bills. You have a right to disagree but not be disagreeable. Like Michelle Bachman calling Dems a "Gangster Government" is unacceptable. She is, in fact, the one being UnAmerican. Your side doesn't want to seem to solve the complex problems we face. Repubs want to just play politics and win and make Obama look bad. And screaming about "Freedom and Liberty" doesn't really solve or do anything.
ajcatoline 1 year ago
@ajcatoline So what's your position on all the leftist politicians calling bush evil and his administration a "regime" over the past 8 years? Why is calling the democrats mean names "unacceptable"? Right wingers are called all kinds of names, notably "tea baggers" which is derogatory sexual slang, yets its "unamerican" to call the democrats gangsters when thats exactly what obama, emmanual, axelrod are, do you know nothing of chicago politics? And are you such a pussy you cry over mean names?
heatsketch 1 year ago
@heatsketch Sestak was wrong to say, BUT he was using the word about a past not sitting Pres, and not with Vitriol or hate in his voice. YOU use to imply Obama is illegitimate. And there is no case for that. We challenged Bush on legitimacy yes, but after Hanging Chads and Supreme Court intervention and Bush's strutting despite a 537 vote "mandate." That criticism was legit. It's not against Obama who is governs like he said he would and HE WON. You have to deal with it till next election.
ajcatoline 1 year ago
@ajcatoline So it goes from no dem has said that to "it wasnt about a sitting president" lol
yes we have to deal with it until next election, so see what happens in november, obama has broken most of his campaign promises, and if you can't see that the health care reform WAS both unconstitutional and against the wishes of the majority you are a lost cause, a hopeless statist shill. the dems have seven months, obama has 2.5 years
heatsketch 1 year ago
@heatsketch WOW you are UNGOVERNABLE if you hate both Bush and Obama Admins. Name One Thing Obama has done "against the Constitution." and don't say passing Healthcare, cause that whole process (assuming the Courts weigh in which they won't) that's all how laws made that's WITHIN The Constitution. So what has Obama done that is illegal exactly? Other than winning, being a centrist/liberal and being of course the first black president? haha
ajcatoline 1 year ago
@ajcatoline im an anarchist, so yea i am ungovernable.
heatsketch 1 year ago
@ajcatoline hmm all his czars are unconsitutional, he supports the fed and the wider drug war which are unconstitutional, hes continuing the patriot act which is unconstitutional (all of these bush did as well)
heatsketch 1 year ago
Yeah right, like the term tea bagger came from that... lololo TEA BAGGER IS DROPPING YOUR BALLS INTO SOMEONES MOUTH... exactly what republicans wanted obama to do, to suck their balls. Now go explain that to republican kids...
medaa25 1 year ago
as if teabaggers are the only ones who believe in the constitution. ba-ha! only people with COMMON SENSE can see the dirty lies of this party and scare tacs. they stand for the consitution or they stand for pursuing rich, white folk interests?! go ahead and remember in november because reality check-you're not the only ones who vote. see you at the polls!
CupcakeBabe27 1 year ago
lmfao
Germy2007 1 year ago
LMAOOOOOOO Teabagers
LeoLoyKoy 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 So, still don't understand? Dems are good because dey are like GOPers? Or GOPers are bad too? Please to helps?
herodsfeast 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 Surely you're not arguing that every specific thing the federal government does must be specifically enumerated in the Constitution? B-b-b-b-but how do they use teh interwebs then? Der was no interwebs in 1787! OH NOES!
herodsfeast 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 So Obama's good?
herodsfeast 1 year ago
I can't tell if this is a joke or not. Can anyone confirm?
herodsfeast 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 It's not that I don't like it more than there's very little sense to it. It's actually kind of funny. Very funny. Actually it's hilarious. It's like you guys tried to be like langston hughes's "I am a negro - and beautiful" but instead you used the term of a sex offender. Definitely fits you guys.
lingojac 1 year ago
I saw several neocon/teabagger blogs claiming this to be 'really funny'. So yeah, us liberals associate really funny with people like Bruce and Carlin and while I wasn't expecting comic genius, this was about as funny as the owner's manual for a '93 Hyundai. Hell, even Hannity and Beck and Limbaugh are funny and multiple divorcee Newt Gingrich lecturing on 'family values' is pure comic gold, even though it's far from intentional. This- not so much.
darkblacksky 1 year ago
is this film supposed to discrediting the tea party?
Fight4Privacy 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 Because breitbart is such a bastion of honesty and journalistic integrity. Remind me where James O'Keefe is. . .
When I say proof, give me something from some source I can believe, even a conservative source, like the Wall Street Journal, or The Economist, somewhere they have standards.
shalcall 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 OMG, two black guys are standing outside my polling station talking to no one except the idiots with cameras asking them questions, I"m soooooo intimidated.
You're ridiculous.
shalcall 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 I'm sorry, do you consider someone that takes out a mortgage, broke? Do you consider someone that has a car loan broke? What about business that is leveraged in order to make infrastructure investment, are they broke? Almost every new business is in debt when it starts, are they bankrupt? You have no sense of finance or economics and you need to stop talking about it until you educate yourself.
shalcall 1 year ago
@towerclimber37
that makes you a liberal then!
LLORT3 1 year ago
Wow, how lame. I know Tea Baggers who swore this was great comedy and I loaded it up, expecting something along the lines of Lenny Bruce or George Carlin, but instead got... this. Why am I not surprised?
darkblacksky 1 year ago
So the Tea Baggers you knew claimed that this was on par with Lenny Bruce or George Carlin? Or are you just a moron who expects a political ad to be on the same level as the greatest comedians of all time?
heatsketch 1 year ago
@heatsketch Elected Democrats never used "Regime" to define Bush, or any Treasonous language. They criticized him sure, but an elected official like Bachman saying the US Govt she serves in is "gangster" is Treason and out of bounds. Calling Obama a "Regime" started with the big dumb Walrus Limbaugh, a slob with no responsibility... "regime" is disrespecting the 63.25 million Americans who voted for President Obama and disrespectful to the USA and Constitution you claim to love. DON'T SAY IT.
ajcatoline 1 year ago
@ajcatoline Again "Regime" came from "Regime Change" referring to Sadaam Hussein and the unnecessary invasion of Iraq which the govt spent 1 Trillion of which 400 Billion is unacounted for... gone missing. Where was Tea Party then? Sure protestors said "Regime Change Begins at Home" referring to Bush and wanting another election. But elected officials like Bachman need to watch their mouths they are not cheerleaders like she was in HIgh School. She's a damn Congresswoman -- act like it.
ajcatoline 1 year ago
@ajcatoline "Elected Democrats never used "Regime" to define Bush"
Oh really?
(January 2010) Democrat Rep. Joe Sestak: In George Bushs regime, only one million jobs had been created"
Democrats called Bush's administration a regime for 8 years. I didn't disagree with them. But they are hypocrites. They aren't against crushing statism, they just want it done their way (they want it to be "fair")
heatsketch 1 year ago
@ajcatoline and remember elected democrat Alan Grayson saying that Republicans want sick people to die quickly so they can make more money?
If I dug around for a while, I'm sure I could find more. But of course it only matters when Obama gets insulted.
Here it is: Obama is a tyrant. His administration contains nothing but thugs (Rahm Emmanual is as evil as Rove and Cheney, if not more so), hes practicing economic fascism, and hes going against both the will of the people and the constitution
heatsketch 1 year ago
@ajcatoline also, it's orwellian that you demand I be respectful toward Obama. Obama hasn't shown any respect for his opposition.
heatsketch 1 year ago
You're not proud or you wouldn't have made it so obvious you were trying to get people of color and those with accents in there. Is it just the most horrid thing in the world for white people to stand up for the country their ancestors built? Even for people on the right?
ShaytanBozorg 1 year ago
@ShaytanBozorg I don't think that old lady counts as someone "with an accent", considering she has the accent of a German or other European immigrant. Not exactly the type of immigrant that affirmative action was created for...
heatsketch 1 year ago
@heatsketch, same difference. That's the difference and you know it as well as I do. They're using political correctness, a black, a white, an accent, etc. Our entire lives are filled with it. Just like parading Jindal, Steele and Palin around -- the conservatives have become liberals and are using liberal ploys. It's sickening. They are dignifying and trying to defend against the accusations the liberals are throwing out.
ShaytanBozorg 1 year ago
This video is now my most favorite.
joncmaxwell 1 year ago 2
The govt mandated that the mechanic's employer issue him safety gear while doing his job, that the dental hygienist finish a specified amount of school, certificates, and practicum hours, ensuring protection for the patient, and that the BAGS of tea themselves are appropriately labeled, quantitatively measured and inspected by the FDA prior to public consumption....
These guys are all protected by government laws and reforms, but yet they're PROUD small govt advocating teabaggers. MORONS.
pvd021 1 year ago
@pvd021 , small government, not NO government. Our founding fathers subscribed to the idea that man is self serving and needs the guidance of law. That is why we have a constitution and that is the most important concern of the Tea Party members. We want our leaders to follow the constitution. It is the only way to guarantee the rights and freedom for ALL Americans.
cowgirlmoon 1 year ago
Define small govt. As I see it, lots of teabaggers prefer deregulation, and little big brother influence in terms of conducting of business and way of life. What you might consider small, may still be considered big government from your very own members. What I don't understand is why this teaparty movement wasn't formed when Bush Jr. passed the Patriot act or created guantanimo bay. This movement only surfaced once Obama was in power and inherited Bush's stupidity?
pvd021 1 year ago
@pvd021, Why didn't YOU form a Tea Party, when G.W. passed the Patriot act? Why aren't YOU a part of a movement, to stop the radical government takeover of private business and the disregard for our constitutional rights? It's much easier to sit in comfort and ridicule others, than to inform ones self in defense of our the fundamental spirit of our constitution.
cowgirlmoon 1 year ago
You're deflecting my question with a question without actually answering anything. I don't form movements, because I don't share the same beliefs as you or your movement. SIMPLY, I don't think this current government is radical, nor do i believe that they infringe, for the most part, on my rights. But obviously you feel different, so my question remains, why are you guys up in arms NOW, but not up in ARMS when Bush Jr. passed the patriot act and set up Guantanamo Bay? Why now?
pvd021 1 year ago
@pvd021 You don't think this government is radical, but you are against bush, but Obama has been quietly adopting Bushs policies, in Education, he plays the same line on the drug war and gay marriage, he hasn't repealed the patriot act, he has expanded the WoT to Yemen and Pakistan, without ending it in Iraq, he hasn't closed Gitmo yet and is now rethinking it (the statements of Eric Holder not withstanding).. so how can you oppose Bush but not Obama when it comes to liberties?
heatsketch 1 year ago
I oppose the Patriot Act, I oppose Guantanimo bay, and withholding these people's right to due process. I'm against BUSH moreso than Obama, because Bush created it. Obama inherited this. I was always against the War in Iraq, since it was very obvious that ALOT of Americans are culturally ignorant, and cannot distinguish between an Iraqi from an Afghani citizen. Obama, is not in anyway flawless, and has much to FIX in this country, but lets be honest, BUSH Jr. created this complete mess.
pvd021 1 year ago
Also, Obama doesn't play the same line on education, which btw is a socialist program. Bush created the No child left behind act, which by majority of educators is a disaster of a program. Obama, told all states attorney to not pursue marijuana dispensaries or medicinal users. VERY opposite of bush. He just recently advocated equal rights for gays in terms of coverage. So I don't know what you're seeing but Obama and bush are VERY different, its insane to think they're the same.
pvd021 1 year ago
@pvd021, I did not form this movement, I became a part of it. I can not answer for the inception of this movement. You want to know why the Tea Party did not object to the Bush administration, but say nothing about the continuation of the policies started under Bush.... The Patriot Act COULD have been rescinded last month, but this administration voted to keep it, so why aren't you objecting?
cowgirlmoon 1 year ago
Who said I didn't object? I object to the Patriot act whole heartedly. I could care less who's side of the aisle you're on. The Patriot Act goes against every American value of law. But like I said, it seems like this group is more pissed off at Obama, who's only been in office for not even 2 years, than President Bush, who not only pushed this law into play but supported for his entire presidency since his inception.
pvd021 1 year ago
@pvd021, Many Americans have been informed and more have become aware of the Radical Marxist background of Obama and the people he has placed within his administration. We don't agree with the idea that our country needs to be "fundamentally, transformed." We are disgusted with the elitism of both parties, wihin our government and the way our constitution is being disregarded.
cowgirlmoon 1 year ago 5
@cowgirlmoon You guys were totally OK with Bush abusing the constitution though. Odd that.
Themixedtwits 1 year ago
@Themixedtwits, you have no idea.... and where the hell were you? Were you marching in the streets? I didn't hear anyone call YOU dirty names, for exercising your 1st amendment rights. I didn't here "YOU GUYS" protest when YOUR MAJORITY congress signed the Patriot Act. Did YOU object to YOUR majority congress, when they recently, made the Patriot Act PERMANENT? I guess THAT was "totally OKAY" with YOU.
cowgirlmoon 1 year ago
@Themixedtwits nope
exaurius 1 year ago
What I find really objectionable is that since the BEGINNING of the Patriot Act becoming law, and for its prevalence for the last x years, there didn't seem to be much rebuke or protest coming from Republicans, but yet as soon as Barack steps into power, all these people go completely nuts for something that has been in existence YEARS before he became POTUS. YEARS. And then they are upset as to why he didn't rescind it. I'm upset about that too? But i didn't see this ? being asked of BUSH.
pvd021 1 year ago
@pvd021 what are you talking about? Ron Paul's campaign started WELL before Obama took power, WELL before the republican primaries. The REAL republicans care, the fake ones that have infected the republican party don't, they are corporate sponsors.
exaurius 1 year ago
@pvd021, but you want more and they don't. MORON TOTALITARIAN
ShaytanBozorg 1 year ago
i absolutely LOVE this video..
and my favorite sign at the rallyes thus far?
"Redistribute My WORK ETHIC"
catonalake 1 year ago 2
This argument of "Bush sucked so whatever" has got to stop... lets get real people.. BUSH fucked this country in the ass for eight goddamn years and I'm supposed to forget about it while you shit on my president who's CLEANING UP THE GODDAMN MESS YOU REPUBLICAN IDIOTS MADE. Don't lecture us on deficits Democrats ALWAYS clean up the mess YOUR party makes.
thewritt 1 year ago
@thewritt , We must realize that this isn't about Bush vs Obama, or Republican vs Democrat. For nearly, 250 years, our Republic has balanced between the two political parties, but other factions and political ideologies have infiltrated both parties and are destroying our fundamental values, from within. The Tea Party members want our constitution restored and the criminal element cleaned OUT of our government and that goes for the corruption of BOTH parties.
cowgirlmoon 1 year ago
W's presidency saw once long slow economic slide followed by the BIGGEST GIGANTIC CRASH IN HISTORY!!! Blame that on the terrorists better yet call me un-american so I'll shut up. W went and charged every dime he spent to CHINA. DON'T LECTURE DEMOCRATS ON F'IN DEFICITS!!! YOU F'IN HYPOCRITES!!!
thewritt 1 year ago
@thewritt ummm, bush sucked, so what ever Obama is doing is what Bush did but worse so you are a fuckign retard. You are the hypocrit fucking fuck face. Go suck opbama's man/wife's dick ass wipe come up with a real argument
thepissedoffpotato 1 year ago
@thepissedoffpotato Yes sir. I will go suck Opbama's man/wife's dick.
thewritt 1 year ago
@thewritt So it is ok when Oblamea does it four fold? And you call conservatives who didn't like it when Bush did it, hypocrites? Delusional!
quickboat22 1 year ago
2000-2008: Corporations avoided taxes, not working Americans. -Working Americans saw their taxes increased by 6 years of "conservative" control. Dont lecture democrats about the f''in deficit. We already balanced the budget once... a lot of thanks CLINTON got for that. W took 90 billion dollars of surplus and GAVE IT TO HIS RICH CRONIES WITH TAX CUT. Hell of a lot of good that did curbing their creed.
thewritt 1 year ago
The best part was "teabagging" that Botox Bitch, Pelosi.... Lets get our country back from these lying progressives.
drcoolfinger 1 year ago 3
...So the tea party is proud to associate themselves with forcefully sticking your scrotum into an unconscious victim's mouth.
When you can't reach high, aim low.
lingojac 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 No, it isn't that simple. There actually is a social security fund, and that's the reason we're still paying out full benefits to retirees. Money "raided" from the social security fund is lent to the government through Treasury bills and bonds. So unless we're planning to default on our debt, social security is fine for at least another 30 years before the Social Security fund is depleted.
shalcall 1 year ago
@towerclimber37
MY idea of the Constitution???? What the hell do you know about what I THINK? You dont' know anything about me. Are you psychic?
This is exactly what I'm talking about. Teabaggers jumping to conclusions, attributing thoughts and feelings to others based on fantasy, and judging others based on NO FACTS, NO INFORMATION. Just judge, react, condemn and repeat.
Idiot.
BradNYC 1 year ago
That is hilarious! Great video! =D
(check out my conservative videoz?)
NephewSamProductions 1 year ago
As is common with this kind of stuff, I honestly can't tell whether it's real or a parody. Could someone please enlighten me?
sneezy720 1 year ago
@towerclimber37 it's pretty obvious you don't have any balls.
billyincredible 1 year ago
Pathetic.
wolf26 1 year ago