Obama administration causes gun sales to increase

[zerotolerance4u]

0bama said to Sarah Brady "we're working on gun control under the radar."

Fast and Furious.

[johnnycmajor]

Oh just Shut up O B O M B M A just shut up and get your shit out of the White House just go home do us this one favor, where ever home is. Just GTFO now.

Impeach this bastard before it is too late. We are in trouble now. Wake up America God Bless.

Go Ron Go

[wikieditspam]

No, these guys are wrong. gun sales increased around the election because hunting season usually, at least in Michigan, in November. For example, in November this year hunting season starts on the following dates: Wisconsin starts on the 19th of November; New Hampshire's Deer/ regular firearms; Ohio various game seasons start on November 4th and 10th. They Are fucking taking this way out of context, using strung to gather sentence frags and people they seem to have hired to speak.

[wikieditspam]

@wikieditspam I'm sure maybe a handful of people honesty bought as many guns as they could that day because they were genuinely freaked out, but for the most part it I would not be surprised that the vast majority of gun sales were in fact for hunting, and correlate with seasonal gun sales in the past. People like finding stories where they don't exist, and they get bonus points if they somehow, through their loud and publicly broadcast stupidity, get people do the things they're afraid of.

[burninghalls]

Also Down here in New Zealand we have also be fraud ed by carbon tax which sucks so ild like to say sorry for not knowing my taxes are supporting the evil bilderberg group and the evil world banks

[burninghalls]

Well you guys are lucky in New Zealand it sucks you aint allowed any guns unless you have an Arms license and if you do you can still only buy a shotgun or a 308 or 22 riffle so we are stuffed here the cops have guns but have to sign a form in order to get them out of the back of there cop cars to use them they aint allowed to carry guns on them only tazers and batons

luckily we have distance on our side and if there's a world war last country the nwo will get to is here

[LastCaress7]

Im gonna buy an apatche helicopter.

[IslaywitaAK]

If I had one question for Odd Behavior After Much Alcohol (O.B.A.M.A) " president, you propose banning guns and making assault rifles hard or impossible to buy, but still letting "hunters" in south dakota to keep theres for home defense and cultural hunting, then why do you let our armed forces carry weapons with no Mod restrictions that kill innocent civilians in the middle east everyday?" It aint right. Restrict civilian use so when there is a revolution, the military is better armed. F That!

[wikieditspam]

@IslaywitaAK Try not to voice your opinions in a way that makes you sound like an idiot who hasn't done his homework.

[fallout3geek]

@timberland1108: Amen to that

[timberland1108]

buy the guns befor the nigger stops it

[MELISSA84008]

Sign an official petition to Congress to oppose the UN's "Small Arms Treaty" that Hillary Clinton has signed!!! Go to :"nationgunrights(dot)org"

[swatcapt11]

Yes Mr Obama Is the Gun sales man of the year

[sensi42069]

I just bought a tank

[rongenman]

obama is great for our gun business and ammo business, they cannot take our guns...there are not enough of them...the standing army is gone...who will help them? gun control is being able to hit your target......

[fixdeluxe1]

Guns are another thing anyone should be able to purchase like a candy bar for instance.

[Delta9son]

Obama = Odd Behavior After Much Alcohol

[farstadman]

nice country doing evrything for national security making wars and not realising your threatening your own soceiety (sry if that is misspelled :p ) and sry but hunting with assault rifles is retarded :p

[matchesburn]

Now you're just trying to stir shit up, InteGrayting.

Accusing the entire republican party of being composed of racists pretty much proves you're trolling. I'm removing the comment.

[InteGrayting]

You are the one who claims I am saying all GOP are racist, when my comment clearly states that is not what I said, and then you removed it to make it look like you told me off. I never said that, you distorted the truth, and until you figure out that creating a false persona to attack is dishonest, and might make you feel good, but will never make you correct.

[InteGrayting]

Wouldn't it actually be more accurate to title this video as "Right wing bullshit and paranoia causes gun sales to increase"?

[matchesburn]

No, it wouldn't.

And if you don't feel the same way about it as us, then I can only think you're here to troll and cause shitfests. If you think all gun owners are "nigger hating" KKK inbreds, then you're stereotyping just as much as a racist - and you're no better than them. And, no, there's no conspiracy here, either.

So if you don't like what you see here, watch another video. I'm not forcing you to agree with my opinions or stay here.

[InteGrayting]

I know, that comes across a bit harsh, but it's not that far off really. Look, I would never say that if you want to own a firearm, that makes you a racist, redneck idiot, or I would be calling myself one. I think if conservatives really knew how many democrats tell the "gun pussy" democrats to shut the hell up, you would be very surprised. It's actually a pretty small group of people who are just as dillusioned as the other side of the issue that truly believes there will be a ban.

[armormaster]

There's those that want to ban guns and those that don't. Liberals and the Democrats in general tend to want to ban guns more than Conservatives, so to me it doesn't matter how "many" of these Democrats are against gun banning, they still are under the same party banner, and "the few" that are in favor of anti-freedom and anti-safety legislation (gun banning) are in charge right now. Do the math. Are you a gun owner or a victim? Pick one, and there's only two choices.

[fixdeluxe1]

No because firearms are a tool that everyone should be able to purchase own and use.I dont actually know if obama is going to restrict gun laws but I do know his opinon dosent fit right with americans.He should consult them then go of with that advice not his own agendas.

[Barfly1911]

@InteGrayting Why do you have to be "right wing" because you believe in the constitutional right to own a firearm. I lean left but I am not in favor of gun control, stop trying to label people. That's what I hate about politics in this country.

[InteGrayting]

@Barfly1911 Re-read it. The ones who bought up the weapons are far more likey "Right Wing" folks who bought into propaganda created by fringe "Right Wing Media" to stir up fear and loathing. I feel that  just because one may lean "Right" does not mean they're all buying it up, but they ones who did "buy in" were that looney fringe "Right Wingers" I refered to. I wasn't putting all Republicans in together in a lump, but GOP does in fact have a lump on it right now that needs to get educated.

[Barfly1911]

@InteGrayting I could care less about Republicans because I am not in their ranks. Okay, we'll play semantics if you wish. I'll rephrase the question. Do you believe that opposition to gun control is a right wing position? That's an easy question that I think can be answered unambiguiously. I await your response.

[InteGrayting]

@Barfly1911 You are boxing shadows. I'm not playing symantics either. Everything in my last post is not only correct, but not insulting to the left or the right. Who cares which side is in opposition to firearms anyway? That is not the topic. However, to say "The Left" is opposing firearms is incorrect. There are loud people who are against it that happen to be "Left Leaning" but that does not make all democrats anti-gun. Anymore than the fringe idiot "Right Wingers" make up all GOP.

[Barfly1911]

@InteGrayting Agreed that it wasn't insulting because you didn't say anything. I'm not boxing shadows I'm trying to pin down your position but it would appear that you don't have one. How can you say that which side is in opposition to firearms is not the topic? That is exactly the topic where have you been? "Who cares"??? everyone who feels affected by the issue. I don't intened to sound mean but please focus

[InteGrayting]

@Barfly1911 To be clear you did not ask me what my position was, but since you want to know. I am a fiscal conservative, social moderate. I feel any law abiding citizen owning firearms is fine. Whether it's for hunting, or just a hobby. I do not think limiting firearms deters crime. In England people get murdered too, and they have very strict firearm laws. Military grade is different though, but we should be able to have whatever the cops can carry on the streets. Including SWAT.

[numberonesurvivor75]

We need MORE guns in the hands of patriotic citizens. GUNS AND MILITIAS!

[onstageagain]

A woman said, Obama I heard a rumor you might be planning some sort of gun ban if elected President.If youve got a gun in your house, Im not taking it,Obama the Illinois senator could still see skeptics on the faces of several men at the back of the room. Obama said! Even if I want to take them away, I dont have the votes in Congress. This cant be the reason not to vote for me. Can you hear me in the back? I see a couple of sportsmen back there. Im not going to take away your guns

[jblcva]

Forget what he says, watch what he does.

[DragginAssphalt1]

Guns are the last defense against a tyrannical government. Use some common sense you gun snatchers. Oh wait, Sheeple don't have common sense. So just enjoy your stay at the FEMA Death Camp.....er i mean Rest and Relaxation camp. Hope the bread lines arent too long.

[kagibb]

I'm surprised the liberal media even did this report but saying the NRA is trying to "scare" people about Obama. Please. Its more like pointing out FACTS to make people wake the fuck up and open their eyes about the anti gunner.

[matchesburn]

I have to agree, sometimes it is surprising what they report on.

The one thing I liked the most about the video is the one reporter was there parroting "But... he says he doesn't want to take away your guns." And the man they were interviewing just said "Look at his voting record."

Strangely, the reporter didn't address that.

I wonder why...

[bayareababe2004]

Nothing like quoting Professor Jacobs a New York University "expert" that there will be no gun ban. LOL

In 4 years we'll know who's right.

[chewbaca1989]

/watch?v=wlSYTtuzFZY

SUICIDE MASS KILLERS ON PRSCRIPTION PSYCH. DRUGS

No shit, ban drugs?

[t0nt01982]

obama arent you a constitutional law professor???!!! 2nd amendment is to protect the people from the tyranny of government! Thomas Jefferson specifically says that! It was the Anti-Federalists that made sure the Bill of Rights was incorporated.Obama is a piece of lying shit.

[ranchnman]

aneb to that brother, amen. keep yer power dry boys!

[xagcx]

I did not defend ATF's actions at Ruby Ridge if you read carefully. As I said, there was no excuse for the way violence was used in those cases.

What you don't seem interested to hear, is that your threats of violence give them a pretext they would not otherwise have.

The Founding Fathers laid out a meticulous logical framework in their case against English tyranny, and exhausted every recourse of diplomacy before it came to arms.

All you sound interested in is shooting things up.

[xagcx]

The Reserve Militia are under jurisdiction of each state and unless a "militia" is operating in accordance with state law it is merely a band of armed men, not the Militia.

By threatening them with violence you give them the excuse to use violence upon you. Randy Weaver illegally modified shotguns then refused to accept the penalty. The "defenseless" people at Waco were armed to the teeth including unlawfully modified automatic rifles. It doesn't excuse the govt violence, but it enabled it.

[Thatmakessense356]

Many shootings could have been stopped with the right to a concealed firearm

eventually someone with a gun is going to go crazy and try to kill lots of people if at least one other person has a gun they won't be able to kill as many people as they please

its scary that Obama will be able to pick the supreme court

it should be an elected position

[ClassicFIHD]

Just remember, 3 Supreme Court Judges are retiring during Obama's term in office. The Second Amendment only passed by 1 vote 5-4.

[jacquelineveronique]

Obama will install new liberal judges and ban guns !

[ClassicFIHD]

jacquelineveronique Wrote: "Obama will install new liberal judges and ban guns"

And if he does thousands will die in a defenseless citizenry. Kinda like DARFUR!

Now who mentioned Darfur as an example where banning guns works. Oh yeah, you did, and it is proof banning guns works, FOR THE BAD GUY!

[jacquelineveronique]

Japan has strict gun control and way less homicides per 100,000 citizens, this means gun ban works !

[ClassicFIHD]

Japan is nothing like American. You bring up a good point. In Japan if you are charged with a crime there is a 99.6% you will go to jail (for a long time). In Japan the justice system works so people are afraid to do a crime. Do you know the suicide rate in Japan is 30% higher than in America. So again you bring up a country that does not support the theory banning guns works.

[ClassicFIHD]

Would you want to live in Japan?

Japanese police keep dossiers on every single citizen. These dossiers are kept updated by the police through interviews with friends, neighbors and relatives twice a year. If, during the police "home visit" the policeman notices contraband such as Playboy magazine, the magazine will confiscated, the person's employer notified, and the person will receive a black mark on their employee record

[jacquelineveronique]

I don't want to live in Japan, just showing gun control works. I hear lame excuse like suicide in Japan, that is totally different from homicide. Killing yourself is your business but you killing another ( me ) is totally different ! You know that and if you don't then Obama must take your guns right away because you shoot yourself is your business, shooting me is crime

[ClassicFIHD]

By government takeover and the loss of your rights.

"Yet few Americans are aware of the horrible loss in personal freedoms the Japanese people have paid for their low crime rate. It is not just the right to own guns the Japanese people have surrendered to their government; they have also given up the right of self-determination, the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and the right to privacy. In Japan these freedoms are routinely violated"

But who cares, right?

[jacquelineveronique]

Bush violated 4th and 10th amendment and I never heard you complain about that.

[ClassicFIHD]

Wow, If that was so then congress did too.

But what does that have to do with banning guns and saving lives?

[jacquelineveronique]

ordering to arrest pot smoking California cancer patients violates the 10th amendment. The Patriot Act violates the 4th amendment. Allowing torture violates 8th amendment.

Do your homework and then come back to me

[ClassicFIHD]

And like I said, the "The Patriot Act" was enacted by the 107th UNITED STATES CONGRESS!!!!!

And what did Bush sign that involves him in California's potheads?

And again what doe this have to do with banning guns except that you lost your debate and you want to talk about something insignificant. Dang, its like interviewing Obama before the election. Obama won, you guys can stop answering ever question with Bush did this and Bush did that.

[jacquelineveronique]

gun control is not going far enough, we need a gun ban

[ClassicFIHD]

"gun control is not going far enough, we need a gun ban" You mean like the example of Darfur where the gun ban there got thousands of gun banned citizens killed, or in Mumbai massacre where a few bad men with guns kill a lot of citizens that were banned from having guns. You know that old taking a machete to a gunfight scenario.

So far you have only proven gun bans dont work. You keep giving proof that proves your wrong.

[jacquelineveronique]

bush ordered FEDS to arrest CA cancer patients, he has not Constitutional right to do that ! Darfur ? You mean the 1 million people killed by guns, this alone is proof we need to ban guns !

[ClassicFIHD]

"1 million people killed by guns" Owned by gangs, police, and military. GUNS ARE ALREADY BANNED!!

Yes Darfur, Where citizens ARE BANNED from owning gun. Darfur where 400,000 were killed raped and tortured by gangs, police, and military personnel. DARFUR IS PROOF GUN BANS ONLY KILL INNOCENT UNARMED PEOPLE.  In Rwanda citizens are also banned from owning guns, and gangs, police, and military personnel killed 2.2 million unarmed innocent citizens raped and tortured thousands more.

[jacquelineveronique]

If gangs didn't have guns then no people would have been killed. Hitler used guns to kill millions. Guns are bad. Why don't you tell the relatives of the 5 killed Amish school girls that the gun was right to kill those lovely girls !

[ClassicFIHD]

"If gangs didn't have guns then no people would have been killed" BUT THEY DO HAVE GUNS!!

"Hitler used guns to kill millions" AFTER HE BANNED AND CONFISCATED GUNS!!!

"relatives of the 5 killed Amish school girl" DOCTORS KILL 9,000 TIMES MORE THAN GUNS!! WHAT DO THEY TELL ALL THOSE RELATIVES! BICYCLCES KILL WAY MORE THAT GUNS! WHAT DOES HUFFY TELL ALL THOSE RELATIVES?

And if citizens in Darfur and Rwanda had guns for self-defence then thousands would still be alive.

[jacquelineveronique]

So you think it was fine for the gun to kill 5 Amish school girls, amazing............

[ClassicFIHD]

Did I say that? But lets get real for a moment, something you dont like. These were little kids, how hard would it have been to use a knife, or a baseball bat. In Belgium just a few weeks ago a guy killed 3 with a knife at a daycare. Do we ban knives? And also you are talking about 1 crazy guy that attacked a childrens school. So he is 0.000000003% of the population. You have kids? You ever give them a bicycle? A piece of candy? Bicycles kill more than guns.

You ever take a drink?

[jacquelineveronique]

Point is guns can kill more people per minute than a knife. An M 16 can fire 900 rds per minute, you can't stab 900 times per minute. Do you know the difference between intentionally / deliberately and accidentally ? If you do then don't come up with the bike comparison.

[ClassicFIHD]

"Point is guns can kill more people per minute than a knife" By criminals, police, and military on unarmed citizens. Not by law abiding citizens.

"If you do then don't come up with the bike comparison" You asked the gun manufacturer to apologize for the dead Amish children, It was no more the guns fault for their deaths than the bicycle manufacturers fault for the kid falling off the bike and hitting his head. Did you ask the bike manufacturer to apologize? Comparison enough?

[jacquelineveronique]

I never blame the person, never done and never will. Even 2 nd amendment advocate " Suzanna Gratia Hupp " whose parents were killed in Killeen shootings. She didn't blame the murderer, she blamed legislation while I blame the gun. Some people have mental problems and not their fault, but if we gave retarded people access to guns.

[ClassicFIHD]

"I never blame the person, never done and never will" So if a drunk person drives into your familys car and kills them it's not the guy's fault but the liquor's fault?

They banned alcohol during prohibition but they saw that didnt work so they decided to control liquor and not ban it.

[ClassicFIHD]

Why would you mention Hupp as your example and then totally contradict her, she clearly never balmed the gun? You did the same thing using Darfur as you gun control works reference.

An M 16 can fire 900 rds per minute The only was a person can shoot for a steady minute is if nobody shoots him down.

[jacquelineveronique]

Because both Hupp and I agree that we don't blame the maniac who killed her parents, I don't blame the VT shooter either. There are crazy people around who have no feelings and are plain evil. She believes she should have had a gun to defend herself and her parents and blames the legislation, not the gun. I blame the gun for the killings.

[ClassicFIHD]

"I don't blame the VT shooter either" And again I ask, if the VT shooter had never been born would that particular gun have run down to VT and shot anyone?

I blame the VT rules that did not allow concealed carry permit holders it the state of Virginia to carry their guns on campus like they do in Utah. Ever hear of any campus shooting is Utah?

You never answered my question about blaming alcohol if some drunk kills your family in a car wreck.

[deworeg]

Ok, how can you not blame the person? The gun did not walk into VT and kill people a person did. You also twisting what Hupp said. She blamed the legislation for allowing her to carry her gun in her vehicle but not on her person, she didn't blame them for not having tougher anti-gun laws as it appears you are trying to say. You have to blame the person. BTW stronger anti-gun legislation will not prevent these types of shootings as they are normal humans who bought firearms legally then snapped.

[ClassicFIHD]

I also noted on your profile that you dont like the saying Guns dont kill people, people kill people, so here is my question. If Seung-Hui Cho had never been born, on April 16, 2007 would those two guns he used magically showed up on the Virginia Tech Campus and started magically started killing people without any humans carrying them?

[ClassicFIHD]

"So you think it was fine for the gun to kill 5 Amish school girls" And here is another question, remember years ago when some guy put poison in Tylenol and killed a bunch of people, Did you ask Tylenol to apologize? Ill bet you blamed the crazy for that and not Tylenol but when it comes to a gun you blame the gun and not the crazy guy. You know how dumb that is? The gun was no more responsible than the Tylenol table.

[Room0468]

You'll never win this debate.

[jacquelineveronique]

I have already won the debate. Most countries in the word agree with me, including our president and Speaker of the House.

[ClassicFIHD]

"Including our president and Speaker of the House" Wow, Moron 1 and Moron 3, you forgot Moron 2, Biden,

Sorry, but you have yet to even prove one point. And all banning guns has accomplished has to get millions and millions of innocent defenseless people murdered, raped and tortured. Its been that way through history. Darfur, Rwanda, Mumabi, China, Russia, Germany, Africa, and the list goes on and on.

Name one place where gun bans have worked.

[jacquelineveronique]

I didn't mention Biden because he has no power. Pelosi is in legislative branch, Obama is executive branch.

[ClassicFIHD]

"I didn't mention Biden because he has no power" and if Obama dies? Bider wrote the failed assault weapons ban. I'm sure he still has plenty of pull over Pelosi. You don't think Pelosi know who her next boss in like is should Obama die?

[jacquelineveronique]

Yeah, if - if - if Obama dies. That is not the case yet and hope it won't happen, and I explained why I didn't mention Joe Biden, nothing more to say about that

[ClassicFIHD]

I hope not too, but to thing Biden is powerless.

[Room0468]

Why don't you tell the millions killed in China, Russia, and Germany after their government took their guns away?

[ClassicFIHD]

And no, it does not prove gun control works any more that playboy magazine control works. It proves a government takeovers work.

[Libertytreeradio]

The people are awake and will not go back to sleep.They are voting with their wallet.This is very obsolete as the suppliers have now sold out completely 3 times since the election.They run out and then resupply. All of the material is now dispersed at the tactical level.The purpose for our arms is to

maintain the check and balllnce system just as the founders intended.We were all here when the Clintonistas burned waco.Bush planned it,Clinton did it(so much for CHANGE)

we won't be fooled again

[xagcx]

The last thing we need is more illegal private "militias" threatening people, resulting in the exact crackdown they fear. Ruby Ridge and Waco were both self fullfilling events, giving the state excuses to put on jackboots and offer a show of force. Anti-Government Rhetoric also helps paint legitimate Constitutional supporters as "wackos" who deserve to be crushed.

Or is that lost on the Alex Jones crowd?

[AbuGrabIt]

xagcx, wasn't the Democratic government the aggressor specially in Ruby Ridge? And didn't Clinton send Border Patrol commandos to capture a 6 yr. old from a fisherman? I believe the Democrats are the wackos out to force everyone to conform to their ideology and stop those who cling to guns and God. BO...one word...SNOB!

[xagcx]

"the constitution is insane?" I said no such thing. It's precisely this inability to debate intelligently, but instead fly off into wild and accusatory conspiracy nonsense that makes your entire movement irrelevant. It also undermines the efforts of serious minded persons, not given to propaganda, hysteria, or childish ranting to help retain our constitutional heritage.

The violence, hate, and fear you promote will only lead to demonization of all who support the constitution, and worse.

[xagcx]

That message was supposed to be in response to "danielstwin"

[xagcx]

Democrats still seem to be under this strange idea that the 2nd amendment has something to do with hunting.

[danielstwin]

lolol ya some dumb sheeple americans think the same thing.. retards must of forgot that thomas jefferson said the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants,,,, 1743 whora

[xagcx]

The point of the 2nd amendment was that all people could defend themselves, their homes and property, their community and their nation. I doubt much if it has to do with people being "sheepish" or "retards" as you put it, but rather a concious desire to drive a wedge between what they see (for now) as acceptable "hunting" guns (that will change), and the "bad" guns that "no one has any business owning" (even though they are absolutely appropriate for defense of the nation).

[danielstwin]

oh so when thomas jefferson spoke of tyrany he was talking about other people. wow the costitution is just a few dollors you need to buy one for you can also educate friends, it said the peoples rite shall not be infringed for its to deffend against tyrants in goverment,,, let me ask have you herd this one? a goverment big enough to give you something is big enough to take everything.. thomas jefferson, he was a great man

[xagcx]

Actually, it is for defense against all tyranny, whether it's from a criminal, a cult, a cartel, a collective, or a king.

I oppose the RonPaul/AlexJones crowd's view of encouraging use of force to solve our current issues. We still have a soap box, a ballot box, and a jury box, there is no valid cause to advocate the ammo box. The constitutional system still exists, and reforms must be conducted within the constitutional system, or it's nothing but anarchy, thuggery or mob rule.

[danielstwin]

sir ron paul is the best man this country has seen in 80 yrs. we the people nees a leaser you have yours and i have mine, good luck on the voting against greedy politicians not to be smart but you should just smash your dick with a hammer youll have better luck. i can just seanse there is something happening do you also feel it coming? im not being smart i allmost wonder if the people are realy fed up?

[xagcx]

Ron Paul's foreign policy is totally insane. He would leave us a lone democracy surrounded by tyrants who had consumed their neighbors.

Nothing turned me off from Ron Paul more than the crazed rhetoric of his supportors, yours is a good example.

What I sense happening is a repeat of unlawful "militias" which will lead to justifiable crackdowns which will limit rights for everyone. This would be a disaster for the U.S., and folks with rhetoric like yours seem to desire it. Uncool.

[danielstwin]

the constitution is insane? you think all these people are going to kill us or eachother if we do not stop them,, dood we are nobody do your research we are puppets, to the church,isreal, the elites, the N.W.O we have watched are country get sold off peice by peice, do you know who owns budweiser now? oh and im not talking ron paul people this will be much bigger and the next rites that get done will be us getting them all back.

[matchesburn]

I have to agree that the ballot box should be used BEFORE the ammunition box, but Ron Paul has not been actively advocating the overthrow of the U.S. government. He is a Congressman trying to avoid the need for that. He encourages people to get active in their government rather than just idle and watch as Club Met On the Hill decides what to do with their fate.

In fact, he's one of the few politicians that actually has our best interests in mind.

As for Alex Jones? He's a nutcase.

[xagcx]

I'd agree that Ron Paul isn't the problem. I appreciate his supportive work for the constitution, and I wish more people and politicians cared for it. My main disagreement with him is on foreign policy, namely refusing to support other free nations around the world who are at risk.

As I said, it's not Ron Paul that I object to, but the people who idolize him (and jones) that seem more interested in anarchy and chaos than keeping the constitutional republic on track, it is they I dread.