Well one things for sure that roger lost to a player who is a great champion but cares for the loser of every tournament he plays in thats why rafael Nadal deserved that grand slam title as much as Federer
you know, when I see this, it makes me understand even more why he cried when he lost that match.. I mean, he was in control. But Nadal was just spectacular.. Great match, and thanks for the upload :)
Rafa owns Fed H2H 15-7 Rafa could retire today and he'd be remembered as a better player then Federer. I don't care about Fed's stats because Rafa is 5 years younger and even when he was an 18yr kid he was already kicking Fed's ass. Oh yeah, Fed is great but he will never be the greatest of his generation!
@2kool4myskool Saying that Nadal is better than Fed because of head to head is like saying that Geller was a better chess player than Fischer. The list of accomplishments speaks for itself. a 315-24 record from 2004-2007? 23 straight Grand Slam semis? 10 straight Slam finals? As for the head to head, it's actually 14-7, and 12 of those matches were played on clay. Nadal is invincible on clay, and Federer is easily top 10 all time on that surface. Only time will tell if Nadal catches up.
@TJFederer15 yep, he was totally dominating this match before the fifth set : he won more points than Nadal in the whole match (including the fifth set) so imagine before.
I'm so frustrated when Federer loses against Nadal, because I often think he could've won : Federer put more points than Nadal in wimb08 final, AO09 final and Madrid10 final. That's why head to head doesn't mean much, Federer is the best ever...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@69wiwi69 lol. In tennis total points won does not mean a thing. What matters is what points you win. Nadal is able to lift his game to a level that no one can match in order to save break points. Nadal's achievements by age compared to to Federer's are much better. There is no need to get frustrated that Nadal is a better player than Federer in these moments of matches.
@mattcheetos lol I know that number of points aren't important. I didn't say federer deserved to win the matches he lost, I just said that their confrontations were very tight
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@69wiwi69 No you didn't. You said you think Federer could have won when he gets more points than Nadal- it even causes you to get frustrated- but now you say you know the points aren't important.
an athlete like Roger that has won everything ... when he loses, he dears should realize how difficult it is to beat him¡¡¡
roger remember me, my baby sister, when I'm playing Pro Evolution Soccer on the playstation and dont let him play to their favorite game, she begins to cry¡
ok u nadal & federer fans...NADAL AND FEDERER r both the greatest! stop fighting over that nadals better or that nadal has not mental abilities...BOTH OF THEM R THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME! ALL TIME! (kanye west :D)
He is the BEST tennis player i've ever seen i was always a fan of his and i play tennis and i see how he has such a positive attitude no matter what unlike Nadal who has zero mental toughness abilities.
@TheClassicbabe lololol, right.....like that wimbledon when the rain delays must have annoyed Nadal to death but he still beat Fed. If you think Nadal has no mental toughness then you probably need your head checked....He's probably the most mentally tough player that has ever played the game. On top of that, he's also number 1 right now, while Federer is number 2. If you understand how the rankings work, Fed isn't getting back to 1 again unless Rafa gets injured AGAIN.
@mousavsm nothing you say is gonna convince me of thinking that Nadal is better the Federer ok. Fed has one 16 or 17 grand slams from 21, did Nadal win as many as he (Fed) did? i think not. and no nadal doesnt have the best mental toughness cuz whenever he wins a point, he starts saying crap and raising his fists in the air. you call that mental toughness? you ARE NOT supposed to show ANY emotions on the court.
@TheClassicbabe I'm not trying to convince you of anything. You are siding with the achievements of someone that is almost 30 (he's played a long time now)....Nadal is still only 24, owner of 7 slams (faster 7 slams than federer, it took federer 3 more slams to reach 7 than Rafa). They are both amazing, why don't we give Nadal a chance to catch up in tournaments played and then make a relevant comparison? As it stands now, Nadal is on a better pace than Federer was, so we'll see.
@mousavsm im not saying that nadal isnt a good player he is good, but its well-known that federer was and still is more successful than nadal. fed is amazing nadal is good. fed played and worked hard on himself to win these 16 or 17 grand slams. nadal has 7 which isnt as much as fed. and it doesnt matter how fast nadal or fed got them what matters is how many grand slams were won. nadal is good but im not a huge fan.
@TheClassicbabe oh and btw, Federer is STILL number 1 and nadal is still number 2. i dont think that the rankings on tv during the wimbledon tournament is gonna lie about something like that. the ranking of each and every player playing is written between brackets right next to the players name. number 1 is written next to fed's name and number 2 is written next to nadal's.
truth be told,he's the best player of all time. That's why I cant stand him,I just want him to lose and let the others to lift the trophies.But he found a real contender in Nadal,who is also a great great player,but in other way,Roger is all class and elegancy while Rafa is all about body strenght,speed,mental toughness and best passing shots i've ever seen.But it seems like talent isn't enough against a guy like rafa
Nadal "stole" this win. Who can argue against the fact that Fed is the greatest ever. You might be able to run him down like Nadal did once again, keeping the ball alive. Anybody that knows anything about tennis can see that Fed has skills that Nadal never had and never will.
@josoohs1 bunch of crap eh. Maybe you should watch these matches closer, Federer plays as much, if not more, defence than Nadal does. You just use your selective memory to side with your homeboy Roger. The point of tennis is beating the other guy, don't forget this. Rafa owns Roger and he's number 1 again, why don't you chomp on that! If you can't put the ball away, then you don't deserve the point, don't forget that. Maybe if you played tennis, you would know.
@mousavsm Wtf are you talking about? Rafa owns roger? LOL. Granted Nadal is winning on their match encounters. Not that this means much since the only surface nadal is winning in, is clay. Roger is all round the greatest tennis player thats ever lived & until Nadal reaches his grandslam count & titles number (he wont). He will still be that. Dont kid yourself. Nadal doesn't show a dominance in Tennis the way roger does.
@SSJ4Razor I guess you can't understand that Roger does well against everyone else on clay, but not Rafa. Also, on the other surfaces (all of them), they are pretty much even if i'm not mistaken. The last 4 times they've met in grand slam finals, Nadal has won them all, and those have been the 08 french, 08 wimbledon, 09 aussie, and 10 french, that's 4 in a row and on 3 DIFFERENT SURFACES. Nadal is only 24, don't forget this, at the same age, he has better numbers than federer..
@josoohs1 Are you just upset that I predicted a month ago (below) that Rafa would be number 1 soon again barring injury, and that he has done it? Rafa works quick i suppose, but he's heading into Wimbledon on a 4 tournament winning streak and the number 1 ranking, should be interesting to see if he can win it after missing it last year and not being able to defend his title.
What a crybaby. He beats all these guys and they never shed one tear, obviously they were pained inside. But when he starts losing, he starts crying. Get used to it Federer, if Rafa stays healthy he will own that number 1 ranking soon. If Rafa remained healthy last year, Federer would have never been ranked number 1 again.
@chrism216 , in terms of the number of major, yes he made history . but he lost to nadal in the final of 2 straight major and in his standard that is a lost , therefore he was a loser in 09 .
well if you look at the rankings at the end of 2009, federer had accumulated 1345 more points than nadal to finish the year ranked Nr 1. yes, that means that throughout the year, he was the best player, won more POINTS than anyone on the tour. you dont have to win slams to be Nr 1. ask safina she will tell you the same thing.
and Nr 1 in the ATP rankings actually means what it states: the bet player on tour.
@chrism216 , ah ranking doesn't accurately represent anything . it just means that they played more tennis and thus accumulated more points . fact is, nadal beat fed 2 in 2 grand slam final in 09 .
nadal and federer actually played the same amount of tournaments that year: 19. federer losing to nadal in in both slams actually means he won a lot more in the other tournaments, considering that the slams are worth a lot more points.
@chrism216 , they are rivals . i did not say nadal was the best . fed lost to nadal in every grand slam final they played especially in 09 where fed lost to him twice in a row which brought tears to fed .
hhhhmmm. this one doesn't make any sense at all. you probably mean 08. but in 09 - federer won the french open (beating soderling in straight sets) and wimbledon (beating andy roddick in a five set thriller). he only lost the aussie open to nadal and the us open to del potro. so I don't see any two defeats in a row from nadal at a grand slam.
guys here you have two UBERplayers, everytime they play it's like apocalypse; the are almost totally equal and it's fun to watch. don't care who's the better, just enjoy
FEDERER puto paquete que nadal te funde y aqui solo poneis videos que los puntos los gana federer poner videos que gane nadal y vereis como es mas espectaular xDDD Rafa the best
a good journalists (and former top tennis trainer) mentioned some very good advice for ferderer when meeting nadal (outside of gravel): going for it and having nothing to lose or to prove, fed should be much more offensive, attacking reluntlessly. Instead, federer is usually insecure against rafa, and a bit uncertain, and statistically stays almost all the time, far behind the baseline. Fed ought to look for the net consistenly, attacking through the middle, on rafa's feet. Sound's plausible.
I think that if you attack down the middle, the first volley becomes hard to execute based on tactics. If you have to pull your opponent off court with the first volley, it gives them a opportune chance to pass you right after. That's why the approach shot should pull players off of the court: so that the first volley can be effective.
But true. Fed does get tentative against Rafa. But it also makes sense that he does. It's easy to understand that Fed hates Nadal's forehand : (
totally agreed, totally. And fed shouldn't go for the middle all the time. But he could do it sometimes, at least more often than he regularly does. Especially the serve down the middle (body shot) is underestimated. I just feel he doesn't change his game up enough against rafa particularly. In the context of rafa, statistics show fed's attacking game is much more effective compared his baseline game. His problem is mental: he must take in more passing shots than with any other opponent.
but nothing, sampras relies on his serve and volley, and never made it to even 1 roland garros final, federer has made it to the last 4 roland garros final and won once, not to mention, federer is much more consistent on all surfaces in terms of grand slam. when you can pull out stat that says sampras made 7 wimbledon finals in a row, 6 US open fnals in a row 4 roland garros finals in a row, and 3/4 past AO finals, then...im sorry to say, federer is better than sampras
@Fourtain oh i wouldn't say this he improved the sport t a lot but at the moment ohter player rule the court like rafa,djokovic,murray,berdych,french and spanish plyer in general they are the future of tennis but no doubt federer that federer is one greatest in the game,still
I do not accept people saying federer was at his best at AO final against NAdal. He was so far from his best that i cant even believe that some people can say that. I dont think he will get to his best ever again at to his dominance in 2004-2007. In 2009 the best match he made was without a doubt QF US OPEN against soderling. In that match he played like before and it was pure magic. try to compare that match to this and then say he was at his best on AO09 final
@amesquitaPT, So your saying all this matches he have lost against Nadal he havent been playing on he´s best? camon dude dont be sucha fanatic fan.... federer whas playing very good maybe not at he´s best but he whas playing good but it whasent enough nadal playe better.
@DonChilenito I agree. Nadal is just a tough matchup for Federer just like Soderling is tough match up for Nadal. When they both are at their peak, I'll take Federer on grass and hard courts, and I'll take Nadal on clay. The main reason for the discrepancy in their head to head is that the majority of their matches have been played on clay where Nadal is 9 and 2 over Federer.
@amesquitaPT Federer played well from the baseline for most of the match in this final, but his serve let him down. He served only like 50%. Had he served better he would have won. Nadal also played better on the big points. Federer had no business losing that third set with all those break point chances he failed to capitalize on.
i cried when Fed. cried cuz i thought as he thought that Rafa. gonna win all champions...,but after i saw them both playing in final match in Madrid.,and Fed. won i said this is the come back of FEDEX!!!!!!!!!!!! Fed (15Grands) =)
@OfficialRogerFederer unfortunately no. 4 straight slam FINAL loses to Nadal would make one think that maybe Rafa (who is also number 1) rules the tennis world...I think the song is pretty fitting, this is Nadal's time.
q si no importa el fisico? jaja en nadal es excepcion todo mundo lo sabe y por que prepotente es mas prepotente nadal como cuando hablo de soderling en el french open
aunque se lo quite en el tenis la historia cuenta y Nadal apenas esta escribiendo la suya, le falta muchisimo para competirle a federer en clase,educacion y estilo de juego nadal depende del fisico:)
Ah! pero es que el tenis no importa el físico, es que parece que estamos hablando de ajedrez. En cuanto a la clase podra tener toda la que quieras, pero prepotencia tiene más...amigo no se si estamos hablando de lo mismo.
nadal es el mejor del mundo por delante de federer ya lo ha demostrado y lo volvera a demostrar quitandole el nº1 de nuevo y volviendo a ver llorar a esa maricona de roger
Nadal lidera la serie pero se debe a que se han enfrentado mas veces en arcilla q en cancha dura o cesped quiero ver que nadal llegue tan seguido en estas superficies con esas rodillitas
All the Fed fans watch this video and they all can't stand to fact that there's somebody that has the balls to stand up to Fed..Rafa won RG and Wimbledon last year and when he gets injured Fed collected those 2 Grand Slams with ease this year, I think that says more about the rest of the men's field than it does about Roger..
that is the usuall reply from Nadal Fans, but though i don't doubt Rafa enormous mental abilities i think the rest of the guys have the the audacity to challenge Fed, yet only a few of them have the game that matches really well to Fed's game. usually Fed has all the answers, but with Rafa he has a big problem dealing with the powerfull topspin forhand to his backhand side. i still think he will have more chances to prove his superiority over Nadal, as he did in Madrid.
that was such a bullshit loss for Fed. he was obviously the better player, yet Nadal is the better competitor. i can't stand watching him lose to Rafa's ugly game. hope they will meet many more times - even at this year's USO, so Rog can improve that crummy H2H.
totally agree .. i still to this day dnt no how fed lost this he won more points hit more winners it was his serve dat kinda was hot n cold .. he should of won the 1st set 2 as he was 4-2 up im stil gutted about this loss but the win against rafa in madrid stil proves who the king of tennis is
Usually i dont like tennis videos with music... often crappy choices but this video is an exception to the rule. This song gives yu wings and makes yu feel yu're the one hanging the racquet in Rod Laver Arena
FEDERER 17 gran slam AUSTRALIA
astrotrain10ful 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
Well one things for sure that roger lost to a player who is a great champion but cares for the loser of every tournament he plays in thats why rafael Nadal deserved that grand slam title as much as Federer
popular890 4 months ago
Not considered the best anymore huh?
darksno 4 months ago
Roger Federer is great, plus Rafael Nadal is the best!! ;)
Rafiita1609 4 months ago
Roger Federer Tennis Master
Nabs07 5 months ago 3
Winning the first set is such a huge thing
bigbillyz 6 months ago
i watch this match over and over again and didn't feel boring at all. This match should be the best ever. Nice music.
zeperin2002 7 months ago
there is a huge penis in the crowd did anyone see it
genericflipper 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
haha nadal is made a fool for the better part of this video eventhough he pawns roger ;)
murtazaasgar 8 months ago
Comment removed
murtazaasgar 8 months ago
Comment removed
murtazaasgar 8 months ago
best player of the world.......EVER.... loved it
elihujonathan 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dude i am so sorry but rafa is simply better than federer
VAMOS RAFA
gregor319 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dude i am so sorry but rafa is simply better than federer
VAMOS RAFA
gregor319 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dude i am so sorry but rafa is simply better than federer
VAMOS RAFA
gregor319 11 months ago
Comment removed
gregor319 11 months ago
Both of then are absolutely amazing. Inspiring play both of you! The bar is raised once again.
180Patrick360 1 year ago
you know, when I see this, it makes me understand even more why he cried when he lost that match.. I mean, he was in control. But Nadal was just spectacular.. Great match, and thanks for the upload :)
DarkMugiwara 1 year ago
@DarkMugiwara when was he in control he was all ways behind
bojack99 1 year ago
when Rog plays, any tennis courts look so bright and the games very exciting. He trully is a KING. :] All hail King Roger!
listen2acoustic 1 year ago
Rafa owns Fed H2H 15-7 Rafa could retire today and he'd be remembered as a better player then Federer. I don't care about Fed's stats because Rafa is 5 years younger and even when he was an 18yr kid he was already kicking Fed's ass. Oh yeah, Fed is great but he will never be the greatest of his generation!
2kool4myskool 1 year ago
@2kool4myskool Yes indeed.! The best comment ever. Well done.
lonbra2012 1 year ago
@2kool4myskool Saying that Nadal is better than Fed because of head to head is like saying that Geller was a better chess player than Fischer. The list of accomplishments speaks for itself. a 315-24 record from 2004-2007? 23 straight Grand Slam semis? 10 straight Slam finals? As for the head to head, it's actually 14-7, and 12 of those matches were played on clay. Nadal is invincible on clay, and Federer is easily top 10 all time on that surface. Only time will tell if Nadal catches up.
hoagly 1 year ago
@2kool4myskool As someone already said,
Karlovic proved that with a good serve, you can be a top 15 player.
Gasquet proved that with a good backhand, you can be a top 10 player.
Gonzalez showed that with a good forehand, you can be a top 5 player.
Nadal showed that with a determination, mentality and effort, you can be world number one.
Federer showed that by combining all these together, you become the GOAT.
Gunthix209 1 year ago
the most fitting song for federer whose key to the kingdom is now being handed over to rafa nadal. he used to rule, now he's screwed over.
BrotherTree1 1 year ago
I love this video!!I cry in the end too lol
GirlyFloweer 1 year ago
4 time champion. true class Roger
federerbestclass 1 year ago
Comment removed
federerbestclass 1 year ago
the king ,the best player of the word forever
astrotrain10ful 1 year ago
This is what Federer thinks when faces Nadal:
"Crap he's much younger than me. DON'T LOSE DON'T LOSE DON'T LOSE. Awwww crap. I lost -.-"
Federer #1!! =D
bls90 1 year ago
i love the hug rafa gives at the end. Hes so sweet.
clem6593 1 year ago
This is a match Roger shud of won
TJFederer15 1 year ago 10
@TJFederer15 yep, he was totally dominating this match before the fifth set : he won more points than Nadal in the whole match (including the fifth set) so imagine before.
I'm so frustrated when Federer loses against Nadal, because I often think he could've won : Federer put more points than Nadal in wimb08 final, AO09 final and Madrid10 final. That's why head to head doesn't mean much, Federer is the best ever...
69wiwi69 1 year ago
@69wiwi69 you are wrong. Nadal won more points in WIMB08 and MADRID10.
zuluzur 1 year ago
Comment removed
zuluzur 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@69wiwi69 lol. In tennis total points won does not mean a thing. What matters is what points you win. Nadal is able to lift his game to a level that no one can match in order to save break points. Nadal's achievements by age compared to to Federer's are much better. There is no need to get frustrated that Nadal is a better player than Federer in these moments of matches.
mattcheetos 1 year ago
@mattcheetos lol I know that number of points aren't important. I didn't say federer deserved to win the matches he lost, I just said that their confrontations were very tight
69wiwi69 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@69wiwi69 No you didn't. You said you think Federer could have won when he gets more points than Nadal- it even causes you to get frustrated- but now you say you know the points aren't important.
mattcheetos 1 year ago
@TJFederer15
That´s a ridiculous statement, my friend. In tennis wins who deserves to win
migscratch 8 months ago
@TJFederer15
yes¡ and you should shut up....
when roger starts to cry...i started laughing¡¡¡¡
an athlete like Roger that has won everything ... when he loses, he dears should realize how difficult it is to beat him¡¡¡
roger remember me, my baby sister, when I'm playing Pro Evolution Soccer on the playstation and dont let him play to their favorite game, she begins to cry¡
roger u are like a spoiled baby
laleiolaloleilo 7 months ago
@laleiolaloleilo Shut up.
T3hMightyIsBack 6 months ago
@TJFederer15 No Rafael Nadal played well, he deserved the win.
coolJoyC 4 months ago
rafael, a great champion, and very fair play...beautiful
albundyforever 1 year ago
at 0:08 you spelt strength wrong
blakeneiland 1 year ago
Ｒｏｇｅｒ ｉｓ true class. love Roger
federerbestclass 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Roger is true class.
federerbestclass 1 year ago
Roger is true class
federerbestclass 1 year ago
great Roger
federerbestclass 1 year ago
he is a gentelmen
ssp13609 1 year ago
stupid video
MrDeanobear 1 year ago
"Unflappable"?
lordtufty 1 year ago
Он на троне теннисной элиты!!! На вечно.... Таких теннисистов никогда не будет..Он Number one!!!
antuan201190 1 year ago
ok u nadal & federer fans...NADAL AND FEDERER r both the greatest! stop fighting over that nadals better or that nadal has not mental abilities...BOTH OF THEM R THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME! ALL TIME! (kanye west :D)
nadalhighlightshow 1 year ago
the question is now will roger federer continue his domination over the others or is he gone?
imbecillealseguito 1 year ago
read these words in an article a little while after this event, beutiful words.
"It seemed a symbolic moment. As Federer sobbed in the background, the tennis world was acclaiming the arrival of the new Master."
But I warn you Rafa is back this year and he is aiming high, im excited I tell ya :)
iiYaMa72 1 year ago
rafa nº1 again!!! vamos rafa!!!!
MsArcris 1 year ago
ROGER FEDERER OWNS!
He is the BEST tennis player i've ever seen i was always a fan of his and i play tennis and i see how he has such a positive attitude no matter what unlike Nadal who has zero mental toughness abilities.
TheClassicbabe 1 year ago
@TheClassicbabe lololol, right.....like that wimbledon when the rain delays must have annoyed Nadal to death but he still beat Fed. If you think Nadal has no mental toughness then you probably need your head checked....He's probably the most mentally tough player that has ever played the game. On top of that, he's also number 1 right now, while Federer is number 2. If you understand how the rankings work, Fed isn't getting back to 1 again unless Rafa gets injured AGAIN.
mousavsm 1 year ago
@mousavsm nothing you say is gonna convince me of thinking that Nadal is better the Federer ok. Fed has one 16 or 17 grand slams from 21, did Nadal win as many as he (Fed) did? i think not. and no nadal doesnt have the best mental toughness cuz whenever he wins a point, he starts saying crap and raising his fists in the air. you call that mental toughness? you ARE NOT supposed to show ANY emotions on the court.
TheClassicbabe 1 year ago
@TheClassicbabe I'm not trying to convince you of anything. You are siding with the achievements of someone that is almost 30 (he's played a long time now)....Nadal is still only 24, owner of 7 slams (faster 7 slams than federer, it took federer 3 more slams to reach 7 than Rafa). They are both amazing, why don't we give Nadal a chance to catch up in tournaments played and then make a relevant comparison? As it stands now, Nadal is on a better pace than Federer was, so we'll see.
mousavsm 1 year ago
@mousavsm im not saying that nadal isnt a good player he is good, but its well-known that federer was and still is more successful than nadal. fed is amazing nadal is good. fed played and worked hard on himself to win these 16 or 17 grand slams. nadal has 7 which isnt as much as fed. and it doesnt matter how fast nadal or fed got them what matters is how many grand slams were won. nadal is good but im not a huge fan.
TheClassicbabe 1 year ago
@TheClassicbabe oh and btw, Federer is STILL number 1 and nadal is still number 2. i dont think that the rankings on tv during the wimbledon tournament is gonna lie about something like that. the ranking of each and every player playing is written between brackets right next to the players name. number 1 is written next to fed's name and number 2 is written next to nadal's.
TheClassicbabe 1 year ago
@mousavsm well why dose rafa always get injured in grandslams isnt it annoying?? right??
turkville 4 weeks ago
truth be told,he's the best player of all time. That's why I cant stand him,I just want him to lose and let the others to lift the trophies.But he found a real contender in Nadal,who is also a great great player,but in other way,Roger is all class and elegancy while Rafa is all about body strenght,speed,mental toughness and best passing shots i've ever seen.But it seems like talent isn't enough against a guy like rafa
blinkMATIC 1 year ago
haha. nice one nadal, used that sliding effect to distract fed. i was like. oh good one. hahha
asteg5 1 year ago
Nadal "stole" this win. Who can argue against the fact that Fed is the greatest ever. You might be able to run him down like Nadal did once again, keeping the ball alive. Anybody that knows anything about tennis can see that Fed has skills that Nadal never had and never will.
mousavsm: Honestly, what a bunch of crap...
josoohs1 1 year ago
@josoohs1 bunch of crap eh. Maybe you should watch these matches closer, Federer plays as much, if not more, defence than Nadal does. You just use your selective memory to side with your homeboy Roger. The point of tennis is beating the other guy, don't forget this. Rafa owns Roger and he's number 1 again, why don't you chomp on that! If you can't put the ball away, then you don't deserve the point, don't forget that. Maybe if you played tennis, you would know.
mousavsm 1 year ago
@mousavsm Wtf are you talking about? Rafa owns roger? LOL. Granted Nadal is winning on their match encounters. Not that this means much since the only surface nadal is winning in, is clay. Roger is all round the greatest tennis player thats ever lived & until Nadal reaches his grandslam count & titles number (he wont). He will still be that. Dont kid yourself. Nadal doesn't show a dominance in Tennis the way roger does.
SSJ4Razor 1 year ago
@SSJ4Razor I guess you can't understand that Roger does well against everyone else on clay, but not Rafa. Also, on the other surfaces (all of them), they are pretty much even if i'm not mistaken. The last 4 times they've met in grand slam finals, Nadal has won them all, and those have been the 08 french, 08 wimbledon, 09 aussie, and 10 french, that's 4 in a row and on 3 DIFFERENT SURFACES. Nadal is only 24, don't forget this, at the same age, he has better numbers than federer..
mousavsm 1 year ago
@josoohs1 Are you just upset that I predicted a month ago (below) that Rafa would be number 1 soon again barring injury, and that he has done it? Rafa works quick i suppose, but he's heading into Wimbledon on a 4 tournament winning streak and the number 1 ranking, should be interesting to see if he can win it after missing it last year and not being able to defend his title.
mousavsm 1 year ago
What a crybaby. He beats all these guys and they never shed one tear, obviously they were pained inside. But when he starts losing, he starts crying. Get used to it Federer, if Rafa stays healthy he will own that number 1 ranking soon. If Rafa remained healthy last year, Federer would have never been ranked number 1 again.
mousavsm 1 year ago
Roger, whole world wept with you that day, but now rejoices with you! Come on!
TheMrBoniace 1 year ago
unflappable?
seven5678 1 year ago
Plizz say this song name :) 0:1
reinisan32 1 year ago
Coldplay - Viva la vida
jahuziom007 1 year ago
The first song is Coldplay - Viva La Vida.
mikro112 1 year ago
i like the way u spelled strenght
nocontrol06 1 year ago 18
@nocontrol06 I like the way you spelt "spelled"
112sangwoo112 1 year ago
@112sangwoo112 well thank you, i can't take all the credit tho, i suppose most of the credit should go to the american dictionary
nocontrol06 1 year ago
@nocontrol06 oh right, sorry then. My ignorance got the better of me haha.
112sangwoo112 1 year ago
great footwork both of you guyz! hheheh
simpleplan15 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Roger Federer .Grand Slam Champion 16
4 Titles Australian Open
1 Titles Roland Garros
6 Titles Wimbledon
5 Titles US Open
Career Grand Slam Complete
22 Grand Slam Finals 1st
237 Consecutive Weeks as 1st .23 Straight Grand Slam Semi-Finals 1st
federerbestclass 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Roger Federer .Grand Slam Champion 16
4 Titles Australian Open
1 Titles Roland Garros
6 Titles Wimbledon
5 Titles US Open
Career Grand Slam Complete
22 Grand Slam Finals 1st
237 Consecutive Weeks as 1st .23 Straight Grand Slam Semi-Finals 1st
federerbestclass 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Roger Federer .Grand Slam Champion 16
4 Titles Australian Open
1 Titles Roland Garros
6 Titles Wimbledon
5 Titles US Open
Career Grand Slam Complete
22 Grand Slam Finals 1st
237 Consecutive Weeks as 1st .23 Straight Grand Slam Semi-Finals 1st
federerbestclass 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Roger Federer .Grand Slam Champion 16
4 Titles Australian Open
1 Titles Roland Garros
6 Titles Wimbledon
5 Titles US Open
Career Grand Slam Complete
22 Grand Slam Finals 1st
237 Consecutive Weeks as 1st .23 Straight Grand Slam Semi-Finals 1st
federerbestclass 2 years ago
fed 09 = loser???
2 majors?
breaking record of pete ?
dumm oder so? :D:D
sandzak16 2 years ago
fed 09 = loser lol
ladyboylizard 2 years ago
2009 made federer the best player in history of tennis.
chrism216 2 years ago
@chrism216 , in terms of the number of major, yes he made history . but he lost to nadal in the final of 2 straight major and in his standard that is a lost , therefore he was a loser in 09 .
ladyboylizard 2 years ago
@ladyboylizard
well if you look at the rankings at the end of 2009, federer had accumulated 1345 more points than nadal to finish the year ranked Nr 1. yes, that means that throughout the year, he was the best player, won more POINTS than anyone on the tour. you dont have to win slams to be Nr 1. ask safina she will tell you the same thing.
and Nr 1 in the ATP rankings actually means what it states: the bet player on tour.
chrism216 2 years ago
@chrism216 , ah ranking doesn't accurately represent anything . it just means that they played more tennis and thus accumulated more points . fact is, nadal beat fed 2 in 2 grand slam final in 09 .
ladyboylizard 2 years ago
@ladyboylizard
nadal and federer actually played the same amount of tournaments that year: 19. federer losing to nadal in in both slams actually means he won a lot more in the other tournaments, considering that the slams are worth a lot more points.
chrism216 2 years ago
tennis isnt about nadal and federer you know... there are other players. nadal beating federer twice does not mean hes the best. by far...
chrism216 2 years ago
@chrism216 , they are rivals . i did not say nadal was the best . fed lost to nadal in every grand slam final they played especially in 09 where fed lost to him twice in a row which brought tears to fed .
i see you are a also swiss :)
ladyboylizard 2 years ago
Comment removed
crazies99 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ladyboylizard
hhhhmmm. this one doesn't make any sense at all. you probably mean 08. but in 09 - federer won the french open (beating soderling in straight sets) and wimbledon (beating andy roddick in a five set thriller). he only lost the aussie open to nadal and the us open to del potro. so I don't see any two defeats in a row from nadal at a grand slam.
crazies99 1 year ago
no one slam
bojack99 1 year ago
guys here you have two UBERplayers, everytime they play it's like apocalypse; the are almost totally equal and it's fun to watch. don't care who's the better, just enjoy
kowalsky111 2 years ago
Excellent compilation of the best parts of the final!!!! Well done. GO FEDERER! SWEET REVENGE THIS YEAR!
Thebelter15 2 years ago
its a simple fact of life, federer cant beat nadal!!!!!!!!!!
XerxesVaia 2 years ago 2
roger=286 semanas continuas como numero 1 ,15 grand slam, 5 años como numero 1 ...roger=numero 1
identidad0 2 years ago
cuando rafa gane 15 grand slams y sea numero uno , x mas d de un par d semanas ahi hablaremos
roloxxx2206 2 years ago
THE BEST PLAYER EVER IS RAFAEL NADAAAAAL!!!!!!!!! I LOVE YOU RAFI......nadja
akizalega 2 years ago
no stupid soundtrack please
mic270469 2 years ago
FEDERER puto paquete que nadal te funde y aqui solo poneis videos que los puntos los gana federer poner videos que gane nadal y vereis como es mas espectaular xDDD Rafa the best
juanaparte 2 years ago
a good journalists (and former top tennis trainer) mentioned some very good advice for ferderer when meeting nadal (outside of gravel): going for it and having nothing to lose or to prove, fed should be much more offensive, attacking reluntlessly. Instead, federer is usually insecure against rafa, and a bit uncertain, and statistically stays almost all the time, far behind the baseline. Fed ought to look for the net consistenly, attacking through the middle, on rafa's feet. Sound's plausible.
tiesthijsthejs 2 years ago
@tiesthijsthejs
I think that if you attack down the middle, the first volley becomes hard to execute based on tactics. If you have to pull your opponent off court with the first volley, it gives them a opportune chance to pass you right after. That's why the approach shot should pull players off of the court: so that the first volley can be effective.
But true. Fed does get tentative against Rafa. But it also makes sense that he does. It's easy to understand that Fed hates Nadal's forehand : (
JL6293 2 years ago
totally agreed, totally. And fed shouldn't go for the middle all the time. But he could do it sometimes, at least more often than he regularly does. Especially the serve down the middle (body shot) is underestimated. I just feel he doesn't change his game up enough against rafa particularly. In the context of rafa, statistics show fed's attacking game is much more effective compared his baseline game. His problem is mental: he must take in more passing shots than with any other opponent.
tiesthijsthejs 2 years ago
roger federer has everything you want in tennis, so he has much to lose, wouldn't you say?
kowalsky111 2 years ago
no he is the best ever, he has nothing more to prove
Innovater6 2 years ago
but..... really, shut the fuck up with you 'buts'. federe all the way. r u stupid... i m sorry, it just pisses me off
safintennis 2 years ago
but nothing, sampras relies on his serve and volley, and never made it to even 1 roland garros final, federer has made it to the last 4 roland garros final and won once, not to mention, federer is much more consistent on all surfaces in terms of grand slam. when you can pull out stat that says sampras made 7 wimbledon finals in a row, 6 US open fnals in a row 4 roland garros finals in a row, and 3/4 past AO finals, then...im sorry to say, federer is better than sampras
naruto345212 2 years ago
Great video^^
Haha, I think like me, you saw the AMAZING video of Federer and Rafa at Wimbledon, with these songs of coldplay...<3
This would be better in HD of course, but stil... I love it !
goten67500 2 years ago
nadal ruined his knees trying to beat Federer all these years.
brucewillis2 2 years ago
@brucewillis2
But his record against him is better for Nadal.
2nadalfederer1 1 year ago
I think tennis without Roger is very boring^^
Fourtain 2 years ago 20
@Fourtain nadal is better than federer in returning.
on9hockeu 1 year ago
@Fourtain i agree with you completely
Bdubbs09 1 year ago
@Fourtain oh i wouldn't say this he improved the sport t a lot but at the moment ohter player rule the court like rafa,djokovic,murray,berdych,french and spanish plyer in general they are the future of tennis but no doubt federer that federer is one greatest in the game,still
gasquet4ever1994 1 year ago
@Fourtain No truer words were ever spoken. Roger makes tennis such a... magnificent piece of art to admire :)
DarkMugiwara 1 year ago
I do not accept people saying federer was at his best at AO final against NAdal. He was so far from his best that i cant even believe that some people can say that. I dont think he will get to his best ever again at to his dominance in 2004-2007. In 2009 the best match he made was without a doubt QF US OPEN against soderling. In that match he played like before and it was pure magic. try to compare that match to this and then say he was at his best on AO09 final
amesquitaPT 2 years ago
@amesquitaPT, So your saying all this matches he have lost against Nadal he havent been playing on he´s best? camon dude dont be sucha fanatic fan.... federer whas playing very good maybe not at he´s best but he whas playing good but it whasent enough nadal playe better.
DonChilenito 2 years ago
@DonChilenito I agree. Nadal is just a tough matchup for Federer just like Soderling is tough match up for Nadal. When they both are at their peak, I'll take Federer on grass and hard courts, and I'll take Nadal on clay. The main reason for the discrepancy in their head to head is that the majority of their matches have been played on clay where Nadal is 9 and 2 over Federer.
zdlore1985 2 years ago
I agree, Fed's best is above Nadal's and everyone else who's ever played's best. When Roger is at his best he is literally unbeatable.
Swordsman808 2 years ago
@amesquitaPT Federer played well from the baseline for most of the match in this final, but his serve let him down. He served only like 50%. Had he served better he would have won. Nadal also played better on the big points. Federer had no business losing that third set with all those break point chances he failed to capitalize on.
zdlore1985 2 years ago
federer is the best tennis player ever
pg2011pg 2 years ago
no!Sampras is the best player ever....i know federer has got 15 wins sampras 14 ...but
Brzosto100 2 years ago
Roger Federer Best , Roger love
federerbestclass 2 years ago 2
Roger Federer Love
Grand Slam Champion 15
3 Titles Australian Open
1 Titles Roland Garros
6 Titles Wimbledon
5 Titles US Open
Career Grand Slam Complete
21 Grand Slam Finals 1st
237 Consecutive Weeks as 1st. .22 Straight Grand Slam Semi-Finals 1st
federerbestclass 2 years ago 2
roger, my tennis idol ever..i start to play tennis when i first saw him playing in tv..it's warming up my body!
MapleDynasty 2 years ago 2
superbe vidéo et superbe chanson qui refléte bien ce match :)
Sonkingston 2 years ago
I love you Roger
federerbestclass 2 years ago
i cried when Fed. cried cuz i thought as he thought that Rafa. gonna win all champions...,but after i saw them both playing in final match in Madrid.,and Fed. won i said this is the come back of FEDEX!!!!!!!!!!!! Fed (15Grands) =)
sameh911 2 years ago
coldplay songs! :D
MIkeM0N0 2 years ago
i fall in love with federer...xD
reymuradaisuke 2 years ago 2
Federer just doesnt convert enough Break points against NADAL!!
GO ROGER!! Major no.16 vs Nadal!!!!!
Jaishankar100 2 years ago
I want Rafa's shoes! Those look sick!
raisethe3 2 years ago
Rafa wins the AUS OPEN and Roger was a second Winner. RAFA IS BETTER THEN ROGER
rafael231993nadal 2 years ago
Get off Nadal's dick you fucking queer ass bitch.
seigaku001 2 years ago
@seigaku001.<---- well here we got someone who likes to look at nadal dick Lol
DonChilenito 2 years ago
dint u have one like this for wimbeldon
bojack99 2 years ago
VAMOS RAFA
YOU ARE THE NUMMBER 1
rafael231993nadal 2 years ago 3
VAMOS ROGER!!
YOU"RE BACK TO NUMBER ONE!!
THE GOAT!!
and nothing else matter..
MrEmoGuy 2 years ago
VAMOS RAFA !
Djokovic1993 2 years ago
Didn't he lose that match? But he's awesome anyway.
jushyosaha604 2 years ago 4
that bh lob passing shot was superb talent
hungsiuming 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
rofl "Strenght". Nice try. Not.
funlovingmonkey 2 years ago
Swiss Real Maschine 4er GREAT Roger
emotio2008 2 years ago
The first words in this video were " I used to rule the world" I think he still does, dont you?
OfficialRogerFederer 2 years ago 3
yes ofcourse
GoRogerFederer1 2 years ago
@OfficialRogerFederer I'm not sure, does he?
mousavsm 1 year ago
@OfficialRogerFederer unfortunately no. 4 straight slam FINAL loses to Nadal would make one think that maybe Rafa (who is also number 1) rules the tennis world...I think the song is pretty fitting, this is Nadal's time.
mousavsm 1 year ago
W FEDERER
boga94 2 years ago
federers bitches have spoken!!!
tetelung 2 years ago
oh oh someone was bitten by the bug of jealousy XD
aczzz01 2 years ago
No doubt Federer is a genious... but why didn´t you choose a different match. AO 2009 final will always be the final of Federer´s tears.
jamhiereus 2 years ago
but these are also memories about roger we will never forget and those moments just show how much he loves this sport
RubinJayJay 2 years ago
q si no importa el fisico? jaja en nadal es excepcion todo mundo lo sabe y por que prepotente es mas prepotente nadal como cuando hablo de soderling en el french open
maldini3412 2 years ago
Roger is the King!
king2gd 2 years ago
federer melhor do mundo
federer the best
federer the lendaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
miguelkk602 2 years ago
his backhand was better than it has ever beena gainst nadal
kwikdude 2 years ago 2
what is the last song (when Nadal is comforting Roger)?
BTuan1 2 years ago
Now You Grow Dull from "Elizabeth the golden age"
GoRogerFederer1 2 years ago
aunque se lo quite en el tenis la historia cuenta y Nadal apenas esta escribiendo la suya, le falta muchisimo para competirle a federer en clase,educacion y estilo de juego nadal depende del fisico:)
maldini3412 2 years ago
Ah! pero es que el tenis no importa el físico, es que parece que estamos hablando de ajedrez. En cuanto a la clase podra tener toda la que quieras, pero prepotencia tiene más...amigo no se si estamos hablando de lo mismo.
jeffpol 2 years ago
nadal es el mejor del mundo por delante de federer ya lo ha demostrado y lo volvera a demostrar quitandole el nº1 de nuevo y volviendo a ver llorar a esa maricona de roger
condedumamarraxe 2 years ago
Nadal lidera la serie pero se debe a que se han enfrentado mas veces en arcilla q en cancha dura o cesped quiero ver que nadal llegue tan seguido en estas superficies con esas rodillitas
maldini3412 2 years ago
RAFAEL NADAL WINNER!!
vicentebleyci22 2 years ago
Federer played a lot better than Nadal at Australian open but failed in the final set, it was more Federer losing the match than Nadal winning it
Khaled4life 2 years ago
All the Fed fans watch this video and they all can't stand to fact that there's somebody that has the balls to stand up to Fed..Rafa won RG and Wimbledon last year and when he gets injured Fed collected those 2 Grand Slams with ease this year, I think that says more about the rest of the men's field than it does about Roger..
fredcp 2 years ago
that is the usuall reply from Nadal Fans, but though i don't doubt Rafa enormous mental abilities i think the rest of the guys have the the audacity to challenge Fed, yet only a few of them have the game that matches really well to Fed's game. usually Fed has all the answers, but with Rafa he has a big problem dealing with the powerfull topspin forhand to his backhand side. i still think he will have more chances to prove his superiority over Nadal, as he did in Madrid.
gihona7 2 years ago 2
that was such a bullshit loss for Fed. he was obviously the better player, yet Nadal is the better competitor. i can't stand watching him lose to Rafa's ugly game. hope they will meet many more times - even at this year's USO, so Rog can improve that crummy H2H.
gihona7 2 years ago 10
totally agree .. i still to this day dnt no how fed lost this he won more points hit more winners it was his serve dat kinda was hot n cold .. he should of won the 1st set 2 as he was 4-2 up im stil gutted about this loss but the win against rafa in madrid stil proves who the king of tennis is
eddieTHEGREAT999 2 years ago
true true
thepatahn 2 years ago
Usually i dont like tennis videos with music... often crappy choices but this video is an exception to the rule. This song gives yu wings and makes yu feel yu're the one hanging the racquet in Rod Laver Arena
Great match btw!
maxiskhan 2 years ago 3
yes federer played some amzing points here but too bad he didn't win this match he had this match in his hands but he was very unlucky
Landche91 2 years ago 5
Roger didnt use to rule the world, he rules the world
aczzz01 2 years ago 7