The real reason no one goes after the million from Randi is.... because there is no million! The real scam is James Randi. Even if you did prove something you actually think he's gonna give you a million dollars, don't get scammed by this con artist!
Ive Invented a design that really works look under " gasoline vaporizer using hollow mixing ball"is not hydrogen but a hollow metal ball that mixes the air gas mixture better
Of course it does not work, if it did WW2 German and Allied aircraft engine designers would have found it , all our car engine technology comes from them.
• Lets see... what was the MPG with the model T Ford corp. 20- 25 mpg..
today the average car gets 15-20 mpg with ALL this tecnology !!
Btw i dont know any invetor that got a letter from this guy requesting proof of their fuel saving devices for a million dollars! what can ya say about this video and the OIL saps that are in it..
@frosted1030 Then you'll be happy to know that a "prius" isn't a gas saving device, instead it is a hybrid vehicle that supplements gas usage with electrical power at lower speeds, and operates as a normal gas vehicle at higher spiders.
@annoythefish a device is a thing made for a particular purpose; an invention or contrivance, especially a mechanical or electrical one. Like a car, or a cell phone.
Now, you asked if I was retarded, and then you said that the prius "operates as a normal gas vehicle at higher spiders." Not sure what you meant by that but clearly you have spider problems if your prius operates that way.
@frosted1030 Its about devices you can install on vehicles with gasoline engines to improve gas mileage that would also include prius or any other vehicle that runs on gasoline. You can't buy a relatively inexpensive gadget that will make any car into a gas/electric hybrid, but the whole challenge for the million dollars is for a device that actually improves the efficiency of the gasoline engine not for a system that uses another power source. (cont.)
@robvlob (cont.) giving away the million dollars to Toyota would make as much sense as giving it away to so schmo who added a diesel auxiliary engine(or even a smaller gasoline engine) to a vehicle for better fuel economy at sustained speeds, which is perfectly feasible more so on the highway than in town.
I am a huge fan of h2ice (running a truck or car on hydrogen) unfortunately whenever I try to explain it to people they say "oh that scam, I've heard of that" It is very frustrating that these kind of pseudo science scanks have been allowed to sabotage our culture.
Hey i know this guy !!! hes the guy with the OIL sapping off his paycheck when he cashes it !! YOU call tell they are covering for BIG oil ... he says Detroit adopts new technology immediately?? what about Stan Myers water cell and spark plug replacement.. or Charles Pouges carbuerator, or guy who invented the better spark plug.. or the guy invented cheap fuel ... how many would you like to really know that Detroit Ignored.
@iliveon Not on their own, they have to be used with something else. So far, empirically, I must have decided on about a dozen other things that can be used in combination with each other to produce individual "reactions".
Do the maths yourself, that is a staggering number!
@AClarke2007 Sure, but newtonian physics applies to magnets. Treat the magnets as surfaces and it comes out perfectly like other materials do. Requiring energy to move. Decelerating due to friction, etc.. Sure oil it up and it may go a while. Add electric and you lose. See, I thought it was real at first too, but if it does work, we'd be using it by now. I actually had a little phase of thinking it was possible, until I realized the structure of magnets.
ok I completely understand and perpetual motion is impossible to create with magnets because Perpetual motion is a an object that creates its own and stores its own energy within itself.
I do know of one thing that is perpetual motion and it happens all around the world all year around.
No. Try lighting, the clouds creating so much static electricity (energy) they store it till they cant hold any more and than BAM, lighting is produced.
@hhohelper The heat is transfered to molecules in the air so it can do that. The sun is the driving force of water going to and from the sea to the air, to the clouds and back
like i would trust the EPA lol and whos paying this old guy to do all this research and the final nail in the coffin is when the commenter actually laughed when suggesting big auto wouldn't fool the public lol, Research GEET folks
I agree with you James, but if the product comes with lab tests from an Independent Test Center then the con factor gets eliminated.
I have such a product tested in a National Test Center and I will take any test you have with pleasure - the results where 20.18% fuel saved = 90-100miles more range per tank.
The video response is mcc - or search mechanicalcruisecontrol
Another member of the Flat Earth Society.This greaseball is pimping for the oil companies.Get Fuel Doctor,so you won't waste your money buying a hybrid.
This Guy is a joke. He is ran by oil company they are paying him to tell you that its fake, well that's a lie. I will agree with one thing and that's not to buy it, but to make it yourself. He obviously does not know what he is talking about. They should rename him from science skeptic to science idiot. Thank you have a nice day. if you second me put a thumbs up.
Why would i worry about gas saving gadgets? well I don't because I invested a little cash in solar energy and seperating hydrogen from water. I converted my truck and car in to dual fuel users. Gas for out of state travel and hydrogen for in state travel. If Mr Randi has a problem with that Idea then he has a poroblem with BMW automobile engineers who developed and perfected that many years ago
I have gas saving ideas but it costs more than a million to get a working prototype in a production car. There are many ways of significantly improving gas mileage on these 150 year old gasoline internal combustion engines. Any investors out there want to help me get started?
@Desertphile Get a loan for a million? Sell the patent to Toyota? That's been done and they just sit on the patent and do nothing with it. Why do you have to call me a stupid shit/ Stupid sub shit! This pile of shit Randi is a disinfo agent. He has no million that he will pay anyone ever. This is all a con and pure bullshit! And your enough of a stupid sub shit dick sucking moron to believe it!
@PMnews1 ; No, Toyota did not buy any such patent. The devices don't work, idiot. If you believe otherwise, get a bank loan and produce your device: it's worth TRILLIONS of dollars! What the bloody hell are you waiting for?
@Desertphile Your a typical sheeple idiot! People have made several such patents with Detroit in the past, I don't know about Japan. I assume the same but laws are different there they don't allow as much entrepreneurism. It is very difficult and not even legal (in many states) to alter a cars pollution system now and is very difficult to as well. It was easier years ago with a carburetor and no pollution crap.
@Desertphile So you think I can go down to the local bank and get a loan for a couple mill? That would be no problem I'm sure. I pointed out in another comment the 150 year old Otto engine is very inefficient. IT would be very easy to improve its efficiency here is just one way but its not the best.
@PMnews1 ; "So you think I can go down to the local bank and get a loan for a couple mill?"
Without question, yes. If your device works as claimed, every bank in the world would rush to lend you the money. Every automobile maker in the world would pay vast sums of money to license your device.
@Desertphile LOL! You believe the myth that this is a free and fair country. Ever see the movie "Tucker: The Man and His Dream"? I suggest you do. Its a true story, one of many.
@BelfastAtheist Fuck you! The film is based on a true story asshole! Do some research! I am so sick and tired of arguing with stupid brainwashed brainless dip shit American assholes who know absolutely nothing about real history or science. Go wave your fucking flag and tell your friends about all your wonderful rights and privileges in this wonderful fucking goddamn country that has enslaved and murdered 10X more than Nazis. This conversation is over!
I've been studying History and Science for three years at a college level and I passed both of them at school, most of my library is also dedicated to these two fields. I didn't even mention history or science...so as for you can guage my knowledge of these respective fields, I have no idea. Had you bothered to read my authors list, you would be aware I probably know more about History than you do.
I'm actually British, you know..one of the first European countries to outlaw slavery starting largely with Wilberforce's anti-slavery movement? The Brits got it right, yeaaars before the Americans did. As for America itself, yes its track record is pretty bad, for slavery and imprisonment. Even I was American, I wouldn't deny this..History is History, you can't change it out of Patriotism.
This conversation is over? Lol way to copout, you gutless, fandious coward.
I asked you a simple question clever clogs, what does the movie have to do with your anti-patriotism?
Incidentally, don't call me a fucking Patriot..I'm utterly against Nationalism, history has taught us where it leads and the bigotry it inspires. However, if you're really so afraid of me that you feel the need to copout at the start, then feel free...be warned though, you're probably never going to get any respect for your intellectuallity that way.
You can generate enough power for HHO device by putting alternators on the wheels. The problem is that with any new car (which are all garbage) you have to find a way around the oxygen sensor without it telling the CPU the fuel is wrong.
@conoba Hmmm but there's more than one way to do it. Here's the deal with the 150 year old Otto engine. At best 3/4 of the gas is burned leaving 1/4 unburned. There are ways to burn all and significantly reduce air pollution. A catalytic converter is unnecessary if you completely burn the fuel to start with. Next, of the energy produced 80% is waisted as heat and must be removed by the radiator. It would be child's play to improve this efficiency.
@conoba Although your comment is logically correct, many hypothetical or not substantiated tests can somewhat disprove the likes of this statement. For example , Maxwell's demon although not proposed by Maxwell himself seems to wittily repel the second law of thermodynamics , HOWEVER , the point of your statement is correct , this trickery is garbage.
How do i get a hold of this guy as i would happly take on this challenge but better yet if he doubles it i'll make a car run on no fuel at all that requires NO charging (except alternator) or extra batterys
@leigh7801 Let me guess (met a guy at work who tried to argue this one), once the car is going the alternator generates electricity for electric motors which in turn spins the alternator? First, it takes at least the same amount of energy to spin an alternator as it outputs, doesn't matter if you gear it. Doesn't feel like it by hand cause the EM coils aren't charged. If they were you couldn't budge it. In a bike powered one you have to add resistance to the coils to start it.
@leigh7801 Also, the output of a typical alternator is around 80 amps at 14.4 volts. Amps x Volts = Watts. 80 x 14.4 = 1,152 Watts. Watts are a unit of power like horsepower. 1,152 Watts = 1.566 Horsepower. That's less than a hundredth of what a new car maxes at. I had the same idea way back in 7th grade, but my idiot of a science teacher didn't understand the first law of thermodynamics, the Conservation of Energy. It's why most or all these free energy things fail.
Well cheapest way to start saving fuel is by putting acetone! Acetone can normally be bought in any hardware store. Fortunately our business van which is a 2500 savana has been showing outstanding performances. we've been able to go up to 800 kms on a full tank. the tank is about 100 liters. it's average used to be around 600 km on highway mileage. you only have to put 1oz per 10 gallon or 1oz per 40L. works for lawnmower too!! anything!! results vary from engines!
ANyone who bites this video is a GUPPIE ! Notice said fellow not saying WHAT inventors he invited or by what medium he done so....hehe NOTICE this fellow does not be specific on the inventions, accept the magnets which no one including myself thinks work.. notice he doesn't ever mention HHO or vaporization.. among of the top fuel savers for obious reason as well as being worried folks would check them out !
ANother pre paid OIl sap.. they say hes a skeptic..? lol NONO hes a yes man
James Randi, I come forward to claim that the well known device: AN electric Motor can definitely save on fuel.. I will provide all the evidence you need for that million dollars, James, you are bogus in this case.
James Randi, Go and invest that million into electric vehicles instead of wasting your time waiting for something better than it that will not come any day soon, you and I know.
It's entirely possible to decrease fuel consumption in a number of ways. Increasing the efficiency of the combustion and mechanical engine process is one. Making cars lighter and more aerodynamic is another. Puppies and wishing on magic rainbows are not.
@frank0067 An electric motor is a device, and it saves lots of gas, the only thing is, it is more efficient to power with advanced batteries than a gas generator Aka: hybrid.
Fuel Doctor has just challenged the jews at Consumer Reports to an independent test challenge.Naturally,they're Marty Mc Fly's in FutureIII-they're chicken.
Wow, $1,000,000 if you can prove ur product works. no one has came to even try. Its a shame that its come to this type of stuff. i hope james randi catches a thousand more like em
This big talking wop won't pay off.Fuel Doctor works for me.He wouldn't know:Greaseballs get enough mob money to buy a new car every three years.They're worse than THE JEW!.
What about the GEET system. THAT WORKS it has been replicated all over the world and although the technology came from the US it is mostly used in Europ and Africa.
@4245047 You don't need GEET. I've connected my car to a handy perpetual motion machine (sorry, I mean "Over-Unity" device) that I've built from a pair of magnets and a coil of wire - no problem, and no fuel bills. Send $2000 in used bills to Dublin, Ireland and I'll send you the plans - honest, you can trust me. I've never been sent to prison.
I think it's pretty funny that Randi considers gas gadgets a scam on par with psychic claims, so he wagers the same amount of money that they're bullshit.
well im using pure water with no gas for 15 yrs. already and theres no problem at all. sometimes consider the natural law rather than the caculator law or man-made law. humvees are on use already. how much did they pay you to post this video?
@askaboutRudyV you know lad , good works can only be shared to good people. it is not for debate or something you have to be amaze with. We have this for necessities, something you have to use for free, and make this world a better place to live.
@MrNg59 True that, I agree, have you ever watched the real documentary movie/research called, "Home", you can watch it here on Youtube. It really opens your eyes. Also that's why I want to be an Engineer, and inventor, since I was about 7 years old. I joined the Marines, got out, and now I'm in college. I might go into Green Tech, but I want to go into more than one field of engineering. I made an HHO device from some ebbok I bought, it also included 100% HHO only plans as well, separate ebook.
@askaboutRudyV big cars and jets companies have copied this idea and wanted to modify this work in a way they can make money out of you(business).of course big companies will not show their works for free , so as we. have your luck if northrop will let you see their copied work.
@MrNg59 I definitely know about the big companies, and their want it all for themselves plans. I agree with you on this as well. The fact is the icecaps really are melting. The sun is way stronger these past few years than it was before 2000. The heat, the shorter amount of time it takes to burn one's skin, little by little, the good thing is, that more and more people are using solar power and wind and stuff.
You can run your car from water.....its called "Hydrogen" derived directly from WATER. Its a fact and SCIENCE. Think im wrong? look it up. Send me my MONEY JAMES!
@quantumleaper900 how do you get hydrogen from water? most likely electrolysis. How do you get electrolysis? electricity. How do you get electricity? Oil, coal, gas, nuclear, hydroelectric.
Here's a problem: the more step between energy source and your car (says from gas --> electricity --> hydrogen --> car), the more loss in energy.
@patbuhr ; ead the web site and "hot it works:" you will see it is a scam. Only an uneducated gullible fool would believe the bullshit on the web site.
Thats why they pulled and crushed all the original electrical cars out of the California test market? Cars the customers really liked, cars that worked well, all taken back away even when the customers offered to buy them. So save your pro corporate jive. Also note all electric cars will have half the parts, will that mean they are half the cost of the gas guzzlers? Why no charging stations now?
BTW, I want replies to this one, I was watching Mythbusters bust every myth about improving gas mileage from adding paint thinner to your gas tank to hydrogen fuel cells. However they proved that adding dimples, like on a golf ball, to the surface of the car significantly improved aerodynamics and MPG. However the used several hundred pounds of clay and the car used way more gas to accelerate. However could you not produce a Dimpled Carbon Fiber body kit? Bumpers, quarter panels, hood, ect...
@illchillkyle Yeah you can, just change the design, and make it a little thicker under the craters, well I think so any ways. It makes since doesn't it?
@askaboutRudyV yes it does haha. I am thinking about buying a yugo and doing it, also make it an electric hybrid with regenerative breaking similar to the Prius. I would easily see over 100MPG
Sorry... but if someone hung a million dollar carrot in front of me I most certainly would not bite it... I don't want to owe the owner of the carrot one millions dollars :P
i'm confused? so the CAI, the TB spacer, and the Exhaust i added to my truck werent going to help my MPG go up? thats funny sense i have gained about 4 MPG's over stock. lol must be something else i'm doing different right? lol must be driving down hill the whole time with a tail wind hahaha. everyone bitching in the comments area is a joke... haha
@SergeHumphrey Send me a link (to my YouTube inbox), to independent scientific research done on this subject. The internet is full of false claims, if you haven't noticed.
@SergeHumphrey You seem to be convinced. Send me the research on the subject you have found, and I'll take a look at it.
Free energy suppression seems to me to be a clear case of conspiracy theory. If anyone could prove that there is such a thing as free energy, they would get a million dollars by the Randi Foundation. They would probably also get a nobel prize, as it would be a breakthrough in technology.
If the government was out to get them, why are they allowed to talk about it? Think!
@simonwedege How about a windmill? a solar panel? not a great source of energy. As of 2007 Free Energy devices were allowed to start coming out because the aluminati folks realized the earth is gonna be another mars if the pollution kills all the bees
@SergeHumphrey Windmills have been around since the 9th century. Solar cell technology started in the 1800's. Vanguard 1 was the first solar powered satellite sent to orbit in 1958. Commercial solar cells have been out since 1955.
Please check basic history about the inventions you're mentioning, before making a fool out of yourself. Especially with that illuminati conspiracy theory bullshit.
@SergeHumphrey You're just making stuff up now. The worlds largest windmill manufacturer had existed since 1898. In 1986, the company almost went bankrupt, but was reestablished in 1987. Since then, Vesta has only made windmills. If it wasn't for banks, Vestas wouldn't be here today.
$ponsored by British Petroleum's notorious Rockefeller/Rothschild Oil-baron syndicate, this "amazing James'Randi" has been revealed as a phony that never ever cough's-up a dime when he is proven to be wrong! Check the internet, he uses the easy obvious frauds as to thereby establish credibility, -anybody can say something does not work, he fails to set forth any intelligent scientific basis for his nay-saying; --thus many say he's a fraud straw-man employed by the criminal Bank'sters...!!!
He sent 40 letters? I sent 2 mails and never got a responseto James. Good job on a news story where hypo-critical levels are at maximum levels. You can't win if you do a test with JREF since they own the rights to publish any findings during the test. READ THE FREAKING CONTRACT BEFORE POSTING A STORY!
He sent 40 letters? I sent 2 mails and never got a response. Good job on a news story where hypo-critical levels are at maximum levels. You can't win if you do a test with JREF since they own the rights to publish any findings during the test. READ THE FREAKING CONTRACT BEFORE POSTING A STORY!
My favorite scam recently is the Nitro-fill for your tires. People are getting suckered into that for as much as $40 left and right, and they believe it makes their gas mileage go up. Most people don't know that the regular air they put in their tires is already 80% Nitrogen. Part of the marketing is that nitrogen is used in race car tires. Well, you're not going to be driving 180mph for hours on end. lol
@SkeksisRule I was talking to someone about this the other day. The main benefit is that 1) you save petrol by driving with a lighter wallet (especially if you pay for it in loose change), 2) you get a cool orange cap for the air valve on your tires
after years of fitting all sorts of "hho" machines, i know they are a scam. i would like low cost fuel. if it takes 300 watts of power to produce 8 or ten litres a minute of hydrogen, will the engine feel no drag from the alternator, no. its like aircon but wiyhout the cold air.
They tested some methods on Mythbusters and the ones that did affect mpg, albeit only slightly, were quite silly. Apparently, putting dimples on the car (like on a golf ball) does increase mpg slightly, but who the hell is going to turn their car into a golf ball to save 2 mpg?
@terminaldeity It requires car manufacturers to make new molds for the body, it doesn't look appealing to most, and their are better ways to save on fuel out there.
Water fusion is just another form of cold fusion. Even with a D-shape reactor, fusion is still only 50% output from the input energy.
It's a neat experiment, and some validity is shown in the cellular proton pump, but we're still 50 years away from a break-even "cold" fusion. Water-fusion cells are not going to happen in this lifetime.
Sounds like a bunch of baloney. I highly highly doubt if little old you is magically going to figure out something radical with all the actual manufacturers standing on the side lines being caught off guard.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Well...I have been doing it for about 10 years now. Do some research on stoichiometric. Knowing that gasoiline engines are programmed to run 14.7 AFR, any fool would understand what a change to 15.5 would mean. That's just the tip of the iceberg.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
HHO, ?!?! WHt the hell are you talking about ?? I think the conversation is OVER. I NEVER mentioned HHO ONE TIME! This means your brain is not capable of understanding what I have written in plain english. If you want to re-read what I have written AND want to have a intelligent conversation, I'm open to that.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The best evidence is to test it. I can tell you strories about what I have done. But will that convince you? I didn't think so. I live in the STL/MO area. Bring me a test vehicle and you can see the results first hand. Look in automotive performance, they have reprogrammers that will increase MPG, and it's suppose to be *verified. Well, the difference is I'm doing it FOR REAL. Those devices cannot measure things like Lambda, nor do they "tune dynamically". Should I really go on?
Surely, there must exist some credible evidence or study on this? With so many cars on the road all around us, anything automobile mpg must be something of high interest. Perhaps you can point me to something on the internet, a website with a scientifically sound study. Perhaps a University article on the subject.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The best i can do via internet is to answer any direct questions in regards to MY research. There is plenty of information out there in regards to reprogramming engine fuel management. Feel free to look it up. Now where is Randi's million dollars? I have a feeling the money is not there, lol.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I will send you links that relate to what I'm talking about. Like I said, the difference is that I can follow through on the claims. Provided you was intelligent enough, you could of already extracted information from me, in a manner as to determine the merit of what I'm talking about. I can give exact answers as to how and why, no problem. You can get into the greatest detail and you will get a logical answer(from me). People with false claims will run out of their "scientific facts" quick,lol.
I can't see how any reasonable person can extrapolate from my messages that I am "unintelligent". I chuck that sort of behavior up to an increasingly spoiled narcissistic with a sense of entitlement, typically seen in the younger people these days.
See, it's up to you to do your best to provide compelling evidence to win people over. Not to make claims and to demand that people accept what you say face value.
If people don't believe you, then you have work to do.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You rejected my "claims" out of hand. Before you even knew what I was talking about. Even now, you know little of what I'm talking about (in regards to engine management).
I find your personal comments funny. I'm not "young", and far from "entitled". LOL.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Randi is a scammer himself. Looks like I'm not eligable to enter based on my lack of "media presence".
quote from application:"This offer is not open to any and all persons. Before being considered as an applicant, the person applying must satisfy two conditions: First, he/she must have a media presence,
I think what Randi wants to present is claims without proper backing, without proper verification. Your proof has to be properly recorded and proven. That is what it is about.
The only "scammer" here seems to be just you here.
The real reason no one goes after the million from Randi is.... because there is no million! The real scam is James Randi. Even if you did prove something you actually think he's gonna give you a million dollars, don't get scammed by this con artist!
General4474 5 days ago
Id sure like to be paid a million bucks look under " gasoline vaporizer using hollow mixing ball" or RLBJR666
RLBJR666 1 month ago in playlist James Randi Speaks
Ive Invented a design that really works look under " gasoline vaporizer using hollow mixing ball"is not hydrogen but a hollow metal ball that mixes the air gas mixture better
RLBJR666 1 month ago in playlist James Randi Speaks
Of course it does not work, if it did WW2 German and Allied aircraft engine designers would have found it , all our car engine technology comes from them.
VERGIS92 2 months ago
I have a friend who built a hydrogen fuel cell that saved a significant amount of gasoline. Does that qualify?
elysium735 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• Lets see... what was the MPG with the model T Ford corp. 20- 25 mpg..
today the average car gets 15-20 mpg with ALL this tecnology !!
Btw i dont know any invetor that got a letter from this guy requesting proof of their fuel saving devices for a million dollars! what can ya say about this video and the OIL saps that are in it..
they are FULL of Horse ____ !
frank0067 2 months ago
Comment removed
frank0067 2 months ago
Comment removed
frank0067 2 months ago
Ugliest woman ever.
EldestSauce 3 months ago
Randi, what about the Prius? Did you give Toyota a million yet?
frosted1030 3 months ago
@frosted1030 Are you retarded?
annoythefish 3 months ago
@annoythefish No.
frosted1030 3 months ago
@frosted1030 Then you'll be happy to know that a "prius" isn't a gas saving device, instead it is a hybrid vehicle that supplements gas usage with electrical power at lower speeds, and operates as a normal gas vehicle at higher spiders.
annoythefish 3 months ago
@annoythefish a device is a thing made for a particular purpose; an invention or contrivance, especially a mechanical or electrical one. Like a car, or a cell phone.
Now, you asked if I was retarded, and then you said that the prius "operates as a normal gas vehicle at higher spiders." Not sure what you meant by that but clearly you have spider problems if your prius operates that way.
frosted1030 3 months ago
@frosted1030 Its about devices you can install on vehicles with gasoline engines to improve gas mileage that would also include prius or any other vehicle that runs on gasoline. You can't buy a relatively inexpensive gadget that will make any car into a gas/electric hybrid, but the whole challenge for the million dollars is for a device that actually improves the efficiency of the gasoline engine not for a system that uses another power source. (cont.)
robvlob 1 month ago
@robvlob (cont.) giving away the million dollars to Toyota would make as much sense as giving it away to so schmo who added a diesel auxiliary engine(or even a smaller gasoline engine) to a vehicle for better fuel economy at sustained speeds, which is perfectly feasible more so on the highway than in town.
robvlob 1 month ago
I am a huge fan of h2ice (running a truck or car on hydrogen) unfortunately whenever I try to explain it to people they say "oh that scam, I've heard of that" It is very frustrating that these kind of pseudo science scanks have been allowed to sabotage our culture.
halloranedward 4 months ago
OH MY GOD MAN......Randi offers a million dollars to prove him on wrong on everything----you gotta have some major balls to gamble on your intellect
TheGreatDeciever55 4 months ago
Companies are not keeping fuel savers off the market, but they have so far effectively kept electric cars from getting bigger.
Stealthsuit07 4 months ago
Hey i know this guy !!! hes the guy with the OIL sapping off his paycheck when he cashes it !! YOU call tell they are covering for BIG oil ... he says Detroit adopts new technology immediately?? what about Stan Myers water cell and spark plug replacement.. or Charles Pouges carbuerator, or guy who invented the better spark plug.. or the guy invented cheap fuel ... how many would you like to really know that Detroit Ignored.
frank0067 4 months ago
James Randi I solved how to save gas. It's called riding a bike or using a hybrid or small motor vehicles such as scooters and motorcycles.
I want that million dollars now plzzzzzzz
AstroWaldo 5 months ago
anything that'll save on gas would be accused a scam, makes sense because of the greedy gas stock holders would do to keep their wallets fat!
RUBAN0606 6 months ago
I am not interested in your money.
AND, YES, I can prove the existence of Perpetual Motion.
Check Mate - Mate.
AClarke2007 6 months ago
@AClarke2007 sorry, but mathematically magnets can't produce extra energy. nor empirically
iliveon 6 months ago
@iliveon Not on their own, they have to be used with something else. So far, empirically, I must have decided on about a dozen other things that can be used in combination with each other to produce individual "reactions".
Do the maths yourself, that is a staggering number!
AClarke2007 6 months ago
@AClarke2007 Sure, but newtonian physics applies to magnets. Treat the magnets as surfaces and it comes out perfectly like other materials do. Requiring energy to move. Decelerating due to friction, etc.. Sure oil it up and it may go a while. Add electric and you lose. See, I thought it was real at first too, but if it does work, we'd be using it by now. I actually had a little phase of thinking it was possible, until I realized the structure of magnets.
iliveon 6 months ago
@iliveon
ok I completely understand and perpetual motion is impossible to create with magnets because Perpetual motion is a an object that creates its own and stores its own energy within itself.
I do know of one thing that is perpetual motion and it happens all around the world all year around.
hhohelper 6 months ago
@hhohelper gravity?
iliveon 6 months ago
@iliveon
No. Try lighting, the clouds creating so much static electricity (energy) they store it till they cant hold any more and than BAM, lighting is produced.
hhohelper 6 months ago
@hhohelper The heat is transfered to molecules in the air so it can do that. The sun is the driving force of water going to and from the sea to the air, to the clouds and back
iliveon 6 months ago
this is a conter information whit no proof
some saving gaz device really work and oil company try to kill them
dont trust what you see on TV!!!!!!!!!!
3ERROR2 7 months ago
The Prius gets good gas mileage.. hmm...
frosted1030 8 months ago
like i would trust the EPA lol and whos paying this old guy to do all this research and the final nail in the coffin is when the commenter actually laughed when suggesting big auto wouldn't fool the public lol, Research GEET folks
HappyJackProduction1 8 months ago
Detroit only adopts what fattens it's bottom line, but nothing which might put them out of business
TheDano1947 8 months ago
I agree with you James, but if the product comes with lab tests from an Independent Test Center then the con factor gets eliminated.
I have such a product tested in a National Test Center and I will take any test you have with pleasure - the results where 20.18% fuel saved = 90-100miles more range per tank.
The video response is mcc - or search mechanicalcruisecontrol
mechcruisecontrol 9 months ago
@mechcruisecontrol So did you take up the challenge then?
Quickblood1 8 months ago
@Quickblood1 I'm guessing he didn't. lol.
Kingslayer76 8 months ago
Another member of the Flat Earth Society.This greaseball is pimping for the oil companies.Get Fuel Doctor,so you won't waste your money buying a hybrid.
ImDavidGurney 9 months ago
Can no one honestly make gas-saving contraptions any more, or are all the best ideas already adopted ideas?
shackupyourstruly 10 months ago
I am fully convinced there is nothing under James Randi's beard.
lieutenantnobody 10 months ago
@greg357159 James Randi is a god and just tells it the way it is. I bet you talk and believe in Sylvia Browne!
leemehan 10 months ago 15
@leemehan
This Guy is a joke. He is ran by oil company they are paying him to tell you that its fake, well that's a lie. I will agree with one thing and that's not to buy it, but to make it yourself. He obviously does not know what he is talking about. They should rename him from science skeptic to science idiot. Thank you have a nice day. if you second me put a thumbs up.
hhohelper 6 months ago
James Randi is a simpleton. He is ignorant and worse won't try to learn... He really should get a shave !
greg357159 11 months ago
If you eat Taco Bell, and fart in your gas tank..........
MOPEDBRAD 11 months ago
Why would i worry about gas saving gadgets? well I don't because I invested a little cash in solar energy and seperating hydrogen from water. I converted my truck and car in to dual fuel users. Gas for out of state travel and hydrogen for in state travel. If Mr Randi has a problem with that Idea then he has a poroblem with BMW automobile engineers who developed and perfected that many years ago
CherokeeApacheIrish 1 year ago
@CherokeeApacheIrish ; Idiot. Watch the video, you stupid shit: it has nothing at all to do with using hydrogen as an energy transport.
Desertphile 1 year ago
I have gas saving ideas but it costs more than a million to get a working prototype in a production car. There are many ways of significantly improving gas mileage on these 150 year old gasoline internal combustion engines. Any investors out there want to help me get started?
PMnews1 1 year ago
@PMnews1 ; "Any investors out there want to help me get started?"
Get a loan, you stupid shit. Or sell the patent to Toyota, you stupid shit.
Desertphile 1 year ago
@Desertphile Get a loan for a million? Sell the patent to Toyota? That's been done and they just sit on the patent and do nothing with it. Why do you have to call me a stupid shit/ Stupid sub shit! This pile of shit Randi is a disinfo agent. He has no million that he will pay anyone ever. This is all a con and pure bullshit! And your enough of a stupid sub shit dick sucking moron to believe it!
PMnews1 11 months ago
@PMnews1 ; No, Toyota did not buy any such patent. The devices don't work, idiot. If you believe otherwise, get a bank loan and produce your device: it's worth TRILLIONS of dollars! What the bloody hell are you waiting for?
Desertphile 11 months ago
@Desertphile Your a typical sheeple idiot! People have made several such patents with Detroit in the past, I don't know about Japan. I assume the same but laws are different there they don't allow as much entrepreneurism. It is very difficult and not even legal (in many states) to alter a cars pollution system now and is very difficult to as well. It was easier years ago with a carburetor and no pollution crap.
PMnews1 11 months ago
@Desertphile So you think I can go down to the local bank and get a loan for a couple mill? That would be no problem I'm sure. I pointed out in another comment the 150 year old Otto engine is very inefficient. IT would be very easy to improve its efficiency here is just one way but its not the best.
watch?v=CVxtdvHePq8
PMnews1 11 months ago
@PMnews1 ; "So you think I can go down to the local bank and get a loan for a couple mill?"
Without question, yes. If your device works as claimed, every bank in the world would rush to lend you the money. Every automobile maker in the world would pay vast sums of money to license your device.
Desertphile 11 months ago
@Desertphile LOL! You believe the myth that this is a free and fair country. Ever see the movie "Tucker: The Man and His Dream"? I suggest you do. Its a true story, one of many.
PMnews1 11 months ago
@PMnews1
You're basing your anti-nationalism on a Coppola film about a car manufacturer?
Your stupidity is so behemothic I can't even put it into words..
BelfastAtheist 11 months ago
@BelfastAtheist Fuck you! The film is based on a true story asshole! Do some research! I am so sick and tired of arguing with stupid brainwashed brainless dip shit American assholes who know absolutely nothing about real history or science. Go wave your fucking flag and tell your friends about all your wonderful rights and privileges in this wonderful fucking goddamn country that has enslaved and murdered 10X more than Nazis. This conversation is over!
PMnews1 11 months ago
@PMnews1
I'm not American, lol.
I've been studying History and Science for three years at a college level and I passed both of them at school, most of my library is also dedicated to these two fields. I didn't even mention history or science...so as for you can guage my knowledge of these respective fields, I have no idea. Had you bothered to read my authors list, you would be aware I probably know more about History than you do.
BelfastAtheist 11 months ago
@PMnews1
I'm actually British, you know..one of the first European countries to outlaw slavery starting largely with Wilberforce's anti-slavery movement? The Brits got it right, yeaaars before the Americans did. As for America itself, yes its track record is pretty bad, for slavery and imprisonment. Even I was American, I wouldn't deny this..History is History, you can't change it out of Patriotism.
This conversation is over? Lol way to copout, you gutless, fandious coward.
BelfastAtheist 11 months ago
@PMnews1
I've seen the movie you fucko..
I asked you a simple question clever clogs, what does the movie have to do with your anti-patriotism?
Incidentally, don't call me a fucking Patriot..I'm utterly against Nationalism, history has taught us where it leads and the bigotry it inspires. However, if you're really so afraid of me that you feel the need to copout at the start, then feel free...be warned though, you're probably never going to get any respect for your intellectuallity that way.
BelfastAtheist 11 months ago
would james randi accept a gas saving device that could save 50% gas usage but will lower engine perfomance greatly? becuz i know how to make 1......
wefsaf33 1 year ago
James Randi does it again WOOOO!!!
chattiestspike2 1 year ago
You can generate enough power for HHO device by putting alternators on the wheels. The problem is that with any new car (which are all garbage) you have to find a way around the oxygen sensor without it telling the CPU the fuel is wrong.
TAMYCRON 1 year ago
The laws of thermodynamics are adamant.
There is hardly any area of science that is more complete or understood.
conoba 1 year ago 5
@conoba Hmmm but there's more than one way to do it. Here's the deal with the 150 year old Otto engine. At best 3/4 of the gas is burned leaving 1/4 unburned. There are ways to burn all and significantly reduce air pollution. A catalytic converter is unnecessary if you completely burn the fuel to start with. Next, of the energy produced 80% is waisted as heat and must be removed by the radiator. It would be child's play to improve this efficiency.
PMnews1 1 year ago
@PMnews1
Really? I did not know.
I would love to read the scientific papers you got your data from.
I used to work in statiscal thermodynamics for a few years but I never dealt with combustion engines.
The finer details of those devices are honestly a bit of a mystery to me.
I do not seem to be the only one who considers combustion engines to be quite miraculous devices.
I have seen professors and engineers alike making quite bold claims about their achivements on these devices in the past.
conoba 1 year ago
@conoba Although your comment is logically correct, many hypothetical or not substantiated tests can somewhat disprove the likes of this statement. For example , Maxwell's demon although not proposed by Maxwell himself seems to wittily repel the second law of thermodynamics , HOWEVER , the point of your statement is correct , this trickery is garbage.
laterzp1g 5 months ago
How do i get a hold of this guy as i would happly take on this challenge but better yet if he doubles it i'll make a car run on no fuel at all that requires NO charging (except alternator) or extra batterys
If any1 knows his email please send it to me
leigh7801 1 year ago
@leigh7801 Let me guess (met a guy at work who tried to argue this one), once the car is going the alternator generates electricity for electric motors which in turn spins the alternator? First, it takes at least the same amount of energy to spin an alternator as it outputs, doesn't matter if you gear it. Doesn't feel like it by hand cause the EM coils aren't charged. If they were you couldn't budge it. In a bike powered one you have to add resistance to the coils to start it.
albinoman13bt 1 year ago
@leigh7801 Also, the output of a typical alternator is around 80 amps at 14.4 volts. Amps x Volts = Watts. 80 x 14.4 = 1,152 Watts. Watts are a unit of power like horsepower. 1,152 Watts = 1.566 Horsepower. That's less than a hundredth of what a new car maxes at. I had the same idea way back in 7th grade, but my idiot of a science teacher didn't understand the first law of thermodynamics, the Conservation of Energy. It's why most or all these free energy things fail.
albinoman13bt 1 year ago
Well cheapest way to start saving fuel is by putting acetone! Acetone can normally be bought in any hardware store. Fortunately our business van which is a 2500 savana has been showing outstanding performances. we've been able to go up to 800 kms on a full tank. the tank is about 100 liters. it's average used to be around 600 km on highway mileage. you only have to put 1oz per 10 gallon or 1oz per 40L. works for lawnmower too!! anything!! results vary from engines!
sambaude 1 year ago
ANyone who bites this video is a GUPPIE ! Notice said fellow not saying WHAT inventors he invited or by what medium he done so....hehe NOTICE this fellow does not be specific on the inventions, accept the magnets which no one including myself thinks work.. notice he doesn't ever mention HHO or vaporization.. among of the top fuel savers for obious reason as well as being worried folks would check them out !
ANother pre paid OIl sap.. they say hes a skeptic..? lol NONO hes a yes man
frank0067 1 year ago
@frank0067 HHO is a scam. If you disagree with that, then you're likely a scammer yourself.
a1mint 1 year ago
James, I come forward, test my claims, even though they have already been tested ;)
You owe me that million buddy LOL!
luc59457 1 year ago
@luc59457 YOu didn't get his invitation either? ..LOL
frank0067 1 year ago
@frank0067 I thought his invitation started here...
luc59457 1 year ago
@luc59457
ya no phone number no email no contact..i said to him i take his challage any day of the week.. but so far so response :D
Hahahaha
frank0067 1 year ago
@frank0067 He is full of shit from what it looks like so far, stamped on his own video comment section. Time tells.
luc59457 1 year ago
Who offers 1 million dollars to prove that their gas saving gadget works. LOL, James: electric motors
luc59457 1 year ago
James Randi, I come forward to claim that the well known device: AN electric Motor can definitely save on fuel.. I will provide all the evidence you need for that million dollars, James, you are bogus in this case.
luc59457 1 year ago
James Randi, Go and invest that million into electric vehicles instead of wasting your time waiting for something better than it that will not come any day soon, you and I know.
luc59457 1 year ago
It's entirely possible to decrease fuel consumption in a number of ways. Increasing the efficiency of the combustion and mechanical engine process is one. Making cars lighter and more aerodynamic is another. Puppies and wishing on magic rainbows are not.
sypher113 1 year ago
@sypher113 That has nothing to do with devices
luc59457 1 year ago
WOW is thiS video sapping of BIG OIL or what !!!
I bet the million dollar carrot is a DUD and a scam to make people brainwashed !
I challenge this guy ANY day !! BUT ya know what.. he be outta sight as fast as ya snap yer fingers !!
SO certainly this is also a large sweeping campaign to help keep OIL on the market !
frank0067 1 year ago
@frank0067
You can get out and push, that would save you a ton on gas.
sypher113 1 year ago
@sypher113 You are not a device..
luc59457 1 year ago
@frank0067 An electric motor is a device, and it saves lots of gas, the only thing is, it is more efficient to power with advanced batteries than a gas generator Aka: hybrid.
luc59457 1 year ago
Fuel Doctor has just challenged the jews at Consumer Reports to an independent test challenge.Naturally,they're Marty Mc Fly's in FutureIII-they're chicken.
rentslave 1 year ago
Wow, $1,000,000 if you can prove ur product works. no one has came to even try. Its a shame that its come to this type of stuff. i hope james randi catches a thousand more like em
karenbear161 1 year ago
This big talking wop won't pay off.Fuel Doctor works for me.He wouldn't know:Greaseballs get enough mob money to buy a new car every three years.They're worse than THE JEW!.
rentslave 1 year ago
What about the GEET system. THAT WORKS it has been replicated all over the world and although the technology came from the US it is mostly used in Europ and Africa.
4245047 1 year ago
@4245047 You don't need GEET. I've connected my car to a handy perpetual motion machine (sorry, I mean "Over-Unity" device) that I've built from a pair of magnets and a coil of wire - no problem, and no fuel bills. Send $2000 in used bills to Dublin, Ireland and I'll send you the plans - honest, you can trust me. I've never been sent to prison.
mandolinic 1 year ago
Haha! How tarded do you have to be to fall for those scams? : )
winterstellar 1 year ago
You forgot electric from Battery+ water = Hydrogen Then back to battery
quantumleaper900 1 year ago
I think it's pretty funny that Randi considers gas gadgets a scam on par with psychic claims, so he wagers the same amount of money that they're bullshit.
ThePsychoReturns 1 year ago
well im using pure water with no gas for 15 yrs. already and theres no problem at all. sometimes consider the natural law rather than the caculator law or man-made law. humvees are on use already. how much did they pay you to post this video?
MrNg59 1 year ago
@MrNg59 Hey what's up man? Do you have any videos on this amazing device of yours? If so, I would like to see it.
askaboutRudyV 1 year ago
@askaboutRudyV you know lad , good works can only be shared to good people. it is not for debate or something you have to be amaze with. We have this for necessities, something you have to use for free, and make this world a better place to live.
MrNg59 1 year ago
@MrNg59 True that, I agree, have you ever watched the real documentary movie/research called, "Home", you can watch it here on Youtube. It really opens your eyes. Also that's why I want to be an Engineer, and inventor, since I was about 7 years old. I joined the Marines, got out, and now I'm in college. I might go into Green Tech, but I want to go into more than one field of engineering. I made an HHO device from some ebbok I bought, it also included 100% HHO only plans as well, separate ebook.
askaboutRudyV 1 year ago
@askaboutRudyV big cars and jets companies have copied this idea and wanted to modify this work in a way they can make money out of you(business).of course big companies will not show their works for free , so as we. have your luck if northrop will let you see their copied work.
MrNg59 1 year ago
@MrNg59 I definitely know about the big companies, and their want it all for themselves plans. I agree with you on this as well. The fact is the icecaps really are melting. The sun is way stronger these past few years than it was before 2000. The heat, the shorter amount of time it takes to burn one's skin, little by little, the good thing is, that more and more people are using solar power and wind and stuff.
askaboutRudyV 1 year ago
You can run your car from water.....its called "Hydrogen" derived directly from WATER. Its a fact and SCIENCE. Think im wrong? look it up. Send me my MONEY JAMES!
quantumleaper900 1 year ago
@quantumleaper900 how do you get hydrogen from water? most likely electrolysis. How do you get electrolysis? electricity. How do you get electricity? Oil, coal, gas, nuclear, hydroelectric.
Here's a problem: the more step between energy source and your car (says from gas --> electricity --> hydrogen --> car), the more loss in energy.
Pardon my comment if you meant to be sarcastic.
Deadman1709 1 year ago
Comment removed
rickyrickrick1224 1 year ago
He has never tested nor contacted the Electronic Engine Ionizer company. Check with them. I did.
patbuhr 1 year ago
@patbuhr ; Yeah, it's still a scam.
Desertphile 1 year ago
@Desertphile How do you know?
patbuhr 1 year ago
@patbuhr ; "How do you know?"
Because I am educated. Give it a try.
Desertphile 1 year ago
@Desertphile Then you are familiar with corona chemistry?
patbuhr 1 year ago
@patbuhr ; ead the web site and "hot it works:" you will see it is a scam. Only an uneducated gullible fool would believe the bullshit on the web site.
Desertphile 1 year ago
Thats why they pulled and crushed all the original electrical cars out of the California test market? Cars the customers really liked, cars that worked well, all taken back away even when the customers offered to buy them. So save your pro corporate jive. Also note all electric cars will have half the parts, will that mean they are half the cost of the gas guzzlers? Why no charging stations now?
leestevens 1 year ago
BTW, I want replies to this one, I was watching Mythbusters bust every myth about improving gas mileage from adding paint thinner to your gas tank to hydrogen fuel cells. However they proved that adding dimples, like on a golf ball, to the surface of the car significantly improved aerodynamics and MPG. However the used several hundred pounds of clay and the car used way more gas to accelerate. However could you not produce a Dimpled Carbon Fiber body kit? Bumpers, quarter panels, hood, ect...
illchillkyle 1 year ago
@illchillkyle Yeah you can, just change the design, and make it a little thicker under the craters, well I think so any ways. It makes since doesn't it?
askaboutRudyV 1 year ago
@askaboutRudyV yes it does haha. I am thinking about buying a yugo and doing it, also make it an electric hybrid with regenerative breaking similar to the Prius. I would easily see over 100MPG
illchillkyle 1 year ago
@illchillkyle NICE, that sounds cool. Hope if or when you do, you post a vid on here of it. Do it up.
askaboutRudyV 1 year ago
Sorry... but if someone hung a million dollar carrot in front of me I most certainly would not bite it... I don't want to owe the owner of the carrot one millions dollars :P
illchillkyle 1 year ago
@illchillkyle LOL, true, true, I would sel it thoug, lol.
askaboutRudyV 1 year ago
Randi is Jesus.. I love this guy!
r3kr 1 year ago
i'm confused? so the CAI, the TB spacer, and the Exhaust i added to my truck werent going to help my MPG go up? thats funny sense i have gained about 4 MPG's over stock. lol must be something else i'm doing different right? lol must be driving down hill the whole time with a tail wind hahaha. everyone bitching in the comments area is a joke... haha
big411daddy 1 year ago
Call me, I'll take that million
GeeTheBarber1 1 year ago
RAN-DI! RAN-DI! RAN-DI!
Sklurch 1 year ago
haha "oil companies are not trying to keep these things off the market"
everyone that has done even a little bit of research know that this simply is not true.
SergeHumphrey 1 year ago
@SergeHumphrey Where is your proof of this claim?
simonwedege 1 year ago
@simonwedege everywhere, just ask Google.
See Bob Boyce Videos
Search "free energy suppression"
SergeHumphrey 1 year ago
@SergeHumphrey Send me a link (to my YouTube inbox), to independent scientific research done on this subject. The internet is full of false claims, if you haven't noticed.
simonwedege 1 year ago
@simonwedege yes and that claim is another one. Do some research.
SergeHumphrey 1 year ago
@SergeHumphrey You seem to be convinced. Send me the research on the subject you have found, and I'll take a look at it.
Free energy suppression seems to me to be a clear case of conspiracy theory. If anyone could prove that there is such a thing as free energy, they would get a million dollars by the Randi Foundation. They would probably also get a nobel prize, as it would be a breakthrough in technology.
If the government was out to get them, why are they allowed to talk about it? Think!
simonwedege 1 year ago
@simonwedege How about a windmill? a solar panel? not a great source of energy. As of 2007 Free Energy devices were allowed to start coming out because the aluminati folks realized the earth is gonna be another mars if the pollution kills all the bees
SergeHumphrey 1 year ago
@SergeHumphrey Windmills have been around since the 9th century. Solar cell technology started in the 1800's. Vanguard 1 was the first solar powered satellite sent to orbit in 1958. Commercial solar cells have been out since 1955.
Please check basic history about the inventions you're mentioning, before making a fool out of yourself. Especially with that illuminati conspiracy theory bullshit.
simonwedege 1 year ago
@simonwedege well now they can get funding from banks, etc.
see if you can find Timothy Thrapp Water fuel museum interview - it's good
SergeHumphrey 1 year ago
@SergeHumphrey You're just making stuff up now. The worlds largest windmill manufacturer had existed since 1898. In 1986, the company almost went bankrupt, but was reestablished in 1987. Since then, Vesta has only made windmills. If it wasn't for banks, Vestas wouldn't be here today.
simonwedege 1 year ago
$ponsored by British Petroleum's notorious Rockefeller/Rothschild Oil-baron syndicate, this "amazing James'Randi" has been revealed as a phony that never ever cough's-up a dime when he is proven to be wrong! Check the internet, he uses the easy obvious frauds as to thereby establish credibility, -anybody can say something does not work, he fails to set forth any intelligent scientific basis for his nay-saying; --thus many say he's a fraud straw-man employed by the criminal Bank'sters...!!!
AryanKnight 1 year ago
@AryanKnight When he been proven to be wrong? Show me one case.
therrydicule 1 year ago
Fuel Doctor FD-47 Fuel Efficiency Booster
kfc63822 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He sent 40 letters? I sent 2 mails and never got a responseto James. Good job on a news story where hypo-critical levels are at maximum levels. You can't win if you do a test with JREF since they own the rights to publish any findings during the test. READ THE FREAKING CONTRACT BEFORE POSTING A STORY!
MMAProfessor 1 year ago
He sent 40 letters? I sent 2 mails and never got a response. Good job on a news story where hypo-critical levels are at maximum levels. You can't win if you do a test with JREF since they own the rights to publish any findings during the test. READ THE FREAKING CONTRACT BEFORE POSTING A STORY!
MMAProfessor 1 year ago
rs4 gas saver chips work.
elemental212 1 year ago
hydrogen generators don't work? i think that was what i heard increases gas mileage ??????
sixpackbinky 1 year ago
I wanna bite James Randi's million dollar carrot.
Oh, that doesn't sound right..
Kousaburo 1 year ago 2
@Kousaburo You know he is actually a real life faggot - like you. Maybe he'll take you up on that offer!
frequently80 1 year ago
@frequently80 I'm not a faggot. So I'm afraid you're going to have to go fuck yourself.
Kousaburo 1 year ago
...
Stacey?
paronomasiaster 1 year ago
wait, does that include fuel efficient cars like cars who get 50+ mpg?
anikinkid 1 year ago
My favorite scam recently is the Nitro-fill for your tires. People are getting suckered into that for as much as $40 left and right, and they believe it makes their gas mileage go up. Most people don't know that the regular air they put in their tires is already 80% Nitrogen. Part of the marketing is that nitrogen is used in race car tires. Well, you're not going to be driving 180mph for hours on end. lol
SkeksisRule 1 year ago
@SkeksisRule I was talking to someone about this the other day. The main benefit is that 1) you save petrol by driving with a lighter wallet (especially if you pay for it in loose change), 2) you get a cool orange cap for the air valve on your tires
frosty956 1 year ago 2
after years of fitting all sorts of "hho" machines, i know they are a scam. i would like low cost fuel. if it takes 300 watts of power to produce 8 or ten litres a minute of hydrogen, will the engine feel no drag from the alternator, no. its like aircon but wiyhout the cold air.
UBERKron 1 year ago
Geet system are scams of a simple vapor carb!
overunitynow2 2 years ago
They tested some methods on Mythbusters and the ones that did affect mpg, albeit only slightly, were quite silly. Apparently, putting dimples on the car (like on a golf ball) does increase mpg slightly, but who the hell is going to turn their car into a golf ball to save 2 mpg?
terminaldeity 2 years ago 5
@terminaldeity
I have challenge any Geet system, even Paul Pantone won't enter my challenge!
overunitynow2 2 years ago
ok?...
terminaldeity 2 years ago
@terminaldeity There are highmilers who turn their engine off for long durations, so :P
Ty4ons 1 year ago
@terminaldeity It requires car manufacturers to make new molds for the body, it doesn't look appealing to most, and their are better ways to save on fuel out there.
luc59457 1 year ago
well for someone who has alot of experience in this..
Hydrogen cannot run cars, unless you change alot of things.
oxy + hydrogen are both explosive and implosive afterwards.
1. you would have to change alot in the engine to make it take advantage of the explosion and implosion
2. you need a pretty decent amount of energy to produce enough hydrogen to run the engine off of
HHO cells in cars??
I say , yes possible, but alot to do and may not be worth it.
Pv8man 2 years ago
@Pv8man
Water fusion is just another form of cold fusion. Even with a D-shape reactor, fusion is still only 50% output from the input energy.
It's a neat experiment, and some validity is shown in the cellular proton pump, but we're still 50 years away from a break-even "cold" fusion. Water-fusion cells are not going to happen in this lifetime.
Rurne 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Give me Randi's number. I can save fuel on any GM vehicle made from 1982/up. Cost, $350 per vehicle...
formula406mpfi 2 years ago
By doing what exactly?
a1mint 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Using the scientific method to refine algorithms within the existing fuel management system.
formula406mpfi 2 years ago
Sounds like a bunch of baloney. I highly highly doubt if little old you is magically going to figure out something radical with all the actual manufacturers standing on the side lines being caught off guard.
a1mint 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well...I have been doing it for about 10 years now. Do some research on stoichiometric. Knowing that gasoiline engines are programmed to run 14.7 AFR, any fool would understand what a change to 15.5 would mean. That's just the tip of the iceberg.
formula406mpfi 2 years ago
More meaningless bullshit. You HHO religious zealots keep failing to understand that:
1) It takes energy to generate HHO.
2) The energy returned is less than (1)
3) The amount of HHO produced is very very little to have any effect - EVEN if it came for free
And, noone has ever proven EVER that an HHO device can increase fuel economy. NOONE. EVER. PERIOD.
Only liars and scammers deny this.
Are you one of those?
a1mint 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
HHO, ?!?! WHt the hell are you talking about ?? I think the conversation is OVER. I NEVER mentioned HHO ONE TIME! This means your brain is not capable of understanding what I have written in plain english. If you want to re-read what I have written AND want to have a intelligent conversation, I'm open to that.
formula406mpfi 2 years ago
Excuuuuse me... after vigorously debating all over the place - people do make mistakes and confuse things. But perhaps you never do, Mr Robot...
Ok, so what's this tinkering with AFR mean - are you tinkering with the engine in an attempt to increase mileage?
Aside from this possibly being illegal, do you have any credible evidence that this works?
a1mint 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The best evidence is to test it. I can tell you strories about what I have done. But will that convince you? I didn't think so. I live in the STL/MO area. Bring me a test vehicle and you can see the results first hand. Look in automotive performance, they have reprogrammers that will increase MPG, and it's suppose to be *verified. Well, the difference is I'm doing it FOR REAL. Those devices cannot measure things like Lambda, nor do they "tune dynamically". Should I really go on?
formula406mpfi 2 years ago
Surely, there must exist some credible evidence or study on this? With so many cars on the road all around us, anything automobile mpg must be something of high interest. Perhaps you can point me to something on the internet, a website with a scientifically sound study. Perhaps a University article on the subject.
a1mint 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The best i can do via internet is to answer any direct questions in regards to MY research. There is plenty of information out there in regards to reprogramming engine fuel management. Feel free to look it up. Now where is Randi's million dollars? I have a feeling the money is not there, lol.
formula406mpfi 2 years ago
The least you can do is to provide a credible link, right here, right now. At least that would help change people's opinions of your claim.
And what's the matter with that million dollars. Why don't you contact Randi and get a meeting set up?
Not doing any of this, will leave people with the obvious opinion of your claims...
a1mint 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I will send you links that relate to what I'm talking about. Like I said, the difference is that I can follow through on the claims. Provided you was intelligent enough, you could of already extracted information from me, in a manner as to determine the merit of what I'm talking about. I can give exact answers as to how and why, no problem. You can get into the greatest detail and you will get a logical answer(from me). People with false claims will run out of their "scientific facts" quick,lol.
formula406mpfi 2 years ago
I can't see how any reasonable person can extrapolate from my messages that I am "unintelligent". I chuck that sort of behavior up to an increasingly spoiled narcissistic with a sense of entitlement, typically seen in the younger people these days.
See, it's up to you to do your best to provide compelling evidence to win people over. Not to make claims and to demand that people accept what you say face value.
If people don't believe you, then you have work to do.
a1mint 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You rejected my "claims" out of hand. Before you even knew what I was talking about. Even now, you know little of what I'm talking about (in regards to engine management).
I find your personal comments funny. I'm not "young", and far from "entitled". LOL.
formula406mpfi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"See, it's up to you to do your best to provide compelling evidence to win people over."
No, it's up to you to gather ALL the information . Then AND ONLY THEN, you are allowed to HONESTLY judge the merit of any claim.
formula406mpfi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Randi is a scammer himself. Looks like I'm not eligable to enter based on my lack of "media presence".
quote from application:"This offer is not open to any and all persons. Before being considered as an applicant, the person applying must satisfy two conditions: First, he/she must have a media presence,
formula406mpfi 2 years ago
I think what Randi wants to present is claims without proper backing, without proper verification. Your proof has to be properly recorded and proven. That is what it is about.
The only "scammer" here seems to be just you here.
a1mint 2 years ago
You're not seeing your sense of entitlement issues here? Seriously, you actually not seeing this?
You're the one making a claim, and you expect me to accept it without any serious or reasonable explanation.
And believe you me, anyone coming across here, isn't going to take you serious for one split second.
Perhaps getting angry again will make you feel better.
a1mint 2 years ago
We'll stick you just being arrogant then.
a1mint 2 years ago