Added: 3 years ago
From: jafalks
Views: 1,103,860
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,940)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • cant wait for Iran to sink all the aircraft carriers in the straight.

  • so many aircraft carrier china and iran dislike this video.

  • What we need, looking forward, is another larger, more powerful generation of carrier. The first of which should be a tribute in name to out greatest president ever, George W. Bush.

  • Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the Enterprise sunk by U-24 in simulated war games in the Caribbean? Luckily for it, that was just for fun, but it sure pissed off the US Admiral. lol. The sub surface undetected not only by the Enterprise, but also by all the warships surrounding it for protection, right next to it. The German U-Boat Captain handed the admiral a photo with his ass in its crosshairs. Message was: You've just been sunk. Needless to say,the admiral wasn't a happy camper. Oh well

  • theres a Nazi comment below named DerStrumerSS

  • @xXPancake11 "SS" you can tell he a nazi, not only that his name has a german sound to it, btw im not saying all german are nazis only some who still believed hittler is right or hate all other races other than whites

  • nigger rap is a shit!

  • everyone always puts down america,then why do all you douche bags come here and open gas stations. go back to packistan or india or whatever shit country you are from. We do not want you scum in our country.

  • @420mikepark

    This american is another example for the reasons people hate you guys, nobody except my dad would actually want to fuck my mum, and a communist would defenetly write different things than i do, and only an american would be as dumb and insult for no reason or for a reason he doesnt even understand. Have a nice day, ive already met to many of the kind of americans like you, theyre boring to write with.

  • @420mikepark Its because theyre hypocrites and/or Muslims/Communists.

  • impressive

    

  • and now the uss obama to bring american fire power in iran...

  • They look like Star destroyers >:D

  • DAmn the bush is badass

  • bringing shit all over the world

  • The Lexington was never sunk?

  • wie sich die amis hier gegenseitig einen runterholen -.-

  • omg, reading the comments here where people bless the US is just sickening, but theyre all from americans, i wouldnt expect anything else but this kind of ignorance and uneducation about all the bad things theyve done. Someone of them is probably going to tell me something about other countries now, especially about my own.

  • @2ab6 this american fucked your mom in the ass last night,chew on that little morsel you fucking commie shithead cock sucker

  • Looking at history of every Nation since its creation, the US is probably the only one who has something to be proud of.

    Russia - Look at the USSR and the KGB, hanging people in their own backyards

    UK- Had the most evil empire in history, Nazis are saints compared to them

    China - Look at any Dynasty

    Japan- WW2, barring enemies alive to save ammo

    The worst thing US has done was dropping 2 Nukes, after which they gave billions to help Japan.

  • @player276 USA the "only country that has something to be proud of"?? Jesus Christ, you forgot USA was the Third Reichs primary supplier of FUEL and MEDICINE, computers at auschwitz were provided by IBM. So yeah, thanks, USA. (dont believe? google)

  • @56KbModem Its not like the IBM new what they would be used for, and i never said US was a saint, but they are certainly better then everyone else.

  • @player276 Supplying the Third Reich with fuel and medicine, caring only about the money and not the millions dying, is surely a good example for us all. Yeah. Better than everyone else for sure.

  • US will fall the same way the Roman empire fell (moral disintegration, inflation, unemployment, corruption, empty treasury, internal and external wars ) .

  • @HarbFamily

    Nice tried fool. Roman Empire were bunch of douchebag boy Scott. Axis of Power were bunch of Gayass hater. Soviet Union empire were bunch of garbage.

    You don't fuck with USA. We will crush you into pieces. Your just a waste.

  • US will fall the same way the Roman empire fell ( invasion ) but by Chinese-Russian nukes.

  • Dont cover it up ! WE BRING PEACE! we are building the new ford class carriers now that will bring 90 tons of diplomacy anywhere in the world

  • May Romes Brother in History The United States of America flurish and prosper for we are the two Republican Superpowers of history and world.

  • THink about the evil that has been defeated due to such fleets.

  • *Stealing oil all over the world

  • хороши корыта)для рыбалки в самый раз)

  • Also, one US carrier does not have the nukes to destroy 91% of the worlds military. there is so much nonsense about nuclear weapons.

  • You cant keep all that old junk . The cost of upgrades do not make it practical.

  • every modern US carrier, has a tactical nuclear payload arsenal locked away.. and enough firepower to destroy 91% of the worlds military

  • I wish they didn't decommission rather they upgrade it for reserve...

  • God Bless America

  • @SheikFazlollahBarDar Well you know god is like santa claus, it doesn't exist. if it did exist it would shit on america

  • @UpInUrAss

    Nice imagination about god and santa but the reality is right now this is the America who shit on every anti-americans and those people compete with each other to lick America's fresh shitty ass to come to this great country and work in McDonals!

  • @UpInUrAss remember that statement when you are standing in front of God begging for your soul. god i real and so is hell. repent before you spend eternity alone and in torment

  • @420mikepark go get laid, you really need it

  • @UpInUrAss Jesus loves you terrorist douche bag

  • @420mikepark who the fuck is that ?

  • All the military might in the world will not bring peace...war machines continue to roll to war and create only more suffering for us and the planet.

    What will bring peace?..Only by the will of God.

  • @JBodine67 Hello?

  • Dumbass Americans haven't learned anything from history. How do you think the Soviet, British and Russian empires fell?

  • whats  the name of first song ?

  • Honestly i hate how people bash America in videos like this. Every country threw out history has been called the "bad guys" or simply labeled as bad guys. Its just how it works. Sure, our leaders may be idiots, but don't judge all Americans on account of a few people who happen to be in charge at the time. America is still a super power that all our allies call upon when they are in need, even if they say bad shit about us before hand. We have had a rough patch, but who doesn't?

  • @porpus99

    America is pretty damn hypocritical, but I don't fault her - she is only 200 years old...

  • @Phead128 Its as i said, every country goes threw hard times to work out all the kinks. Like, people are blaming the US for whats happening in the middle east, but they forget the fact that France, Britain, and other nations are there as well. People also forget the fact that after every natural disaster, from the Tsunami in Japan, to the Earthquake in Haiti, the US has devoted more to rescue efforts and reconstruction then anyone else.

  • @porpus99 I agree with you +

  • @porpus99 I'm not even American I'm British and I think thats true tbh

  • @porpus99 Thats because these dumbasses only emphasize on the bad things the US has done.

  • @porpus99 youre a 12 years old little kid that doesnt even know WHY other countries are in the middle east.....BECAUSE OF THE USA.

  • @2ab6 Number one, my age is irrelevant to any comment i post. That fact you attack that first shows that your an asshole with no real knowledge of anything. When the US went into Afghanistan for Bin Laden, that was an acceptable act. Iraq was a mistake caused by corrupt politicians who have hijacked this country. As for other nations, if they do not want to be there they can leave, yet they stay. They instead have corrupt politicians of there own to obey.

  • @porpus99

    it was not an acceptable act to attack a country for one person, which you dont even know existed, but you can asume he did. Other nations cant leave, maybe you look up why.

  • @2ab6 Ill use Britain as an example, and i mean no offence to them. Britain is there for a majority of reasons, witch would take to long to list. The UK is a known supplier of weapons to the Middle East and North Africa. Eventually, one way or another, those weapons can end up in the hands of terrorist. Now, during the Cold War the US trained the Taliban to fight the Russians. A combination of these factors make the terrorist cells the fighting force that they are now.

  • @porpus99

    The Us is also known for being a weapons supplier, and for having the UK as allies. Do you know how US soldiers behave in the countries theyve invaded? They regard everyone as an enemy, and occassionaly commit a warcrime, in the end the US will be more judged by history then the nazis were.

  • @2ab6 Also, we did not go after just one man, we went after the Taliban in general because they would keep attacking us no matter what. Sure we could have handled it a better way, but im not the guy pulling the strings here. Iraq was just a big mistake, and i think Bush and Cheney are war criminals. But back to my original point, the US does not deserve all the blame. We deserve alot, but not all. Should we meddle in other countries business? No, only when it affects us.

  • @porpus99 When did the Taliban ever attack the US? Iraq was a mistake, but the Us generally doesnt excuse its actions. I must say youre one of the less americans actually being able to have a objective discussions.

  • @2ab6 Actually i have been sharing my views of things i have heard and gathered from the news here in the US, or Russian News(which is unfiltered). As for the Taliban, they sided with Al Qaeda, and Al Qaeda attacked on 9/11. Sense then the Taliban has attacked US troops on many occasions. Before you say im one of those people who us 9/11 as an excuse, then your wrong. America has no business there any more. Back to my original point, the US is not only country responsable.

  • @porpus99

    ofcourse they attack US troops, do you think they let themselves being killed by them? -.-

    Be careful about US news, theyre government controlled. Americans bringing 9/11 as an excuse are being laughed at by the world, you cant even know for sure if it wasnt an insider job, and im being serious. Dont you think its easy to start wars when the whole nation is in anger and will most probably support a war? The US is not responsible, but yet you americans take the responsebility.

  • @2ab6 That is why i mentioned Russian news. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, there media is basically free to play what they want. So they show an unfiltered news. As for the War on Terror, that was caused by the major powers basically strip mining the Middle East during the 1950's, then killing people who spoke up against it. That lead to acts retaliation over time. Im not going to get into the details with little space to type, but the problems now are caused by Blow Back.

  • @porpus99 You are mentioning Western European countries that do not compare to the US in terms of economic or military strength. The fact that they are their supporting a vastly superior ally, means nothing. Simply pawns of the Americans. Also if you know anything about Haiti and its history, you would know that it has been western european and US powers that have created it's current condition. The US is a hypocrite. Promoting democracy through brutal military force.

  • @porpus99 people just hate the famous things, that's what i learnt, USA is the most known country, and is hated by a lot of people, another example would be the game call of duty, known by a lot, hated by a lot... people are just a bit stupid

  • GRINGOS HIJOS DE PUTA TRAGA CHELE SIN SU JUGUETES NO SON NADA CHUPA PINGAS AHORA PS HIJOS DE PUTA ESATN EN NADA HAHAH!!

  • Yorktown didn't sink.........

  • carriers are soon to be obsolete technology, just like battleships 50 years ago. ballistic missile are now able to take them down like a sitting duck in the middle of the ocean, first with this capability is chinese missile DF-21, currently in test phase

  • @UpInUrAss There are lots of "missiles" that are technically capable of striking a heavy blow to an aircraft carrier, but that doesn't make it an obsolete technology. Carriers are heavily defended by many different technologies with vast operational ranges. Carriers are not front-line battleships but are more like floating remote operating stations. Sinking a carrier is not so simple as launching a missile at it.

  • @SphinctersForever keep trying to convince yourself

  • Comment removed

  • @newdefsyswhere just to piss off americans

  • Comment removed

  • @newdefsys you don't even appear to be smart, just another american moron who thinks he's so superior.

  • @UpInUrAss

    Actually the "first with this capability" was Russia with their Sunburn/Moskit anti-ship missiles.

  • Lol, one of these modern day carriers could just run over one of the WW2 ships. haha

  • THE yorktown was never sunk. It's actually in Charleston South Carolina right now.

  • Comment removed

  • @proeatr16 CV-10 vs CV-5, different ships, same name. The name USS Yorktown has been used many times. cheers

  • The Yorktown (CV-5) was sunk at the Battle of Midway in 1942, and a new (CV-10) Yorktown was named in her honor in 1943. Holy crap.

  • another HITLER race!!!! fuck off yanks

  • Comment removed

  • queen elizebath class all the way

  • yeah but nimitz is going to still be number one no offese bro you cane even do the research if you want.

  • @jerkingcantdie17 dont matter about size all the time, queen elizebath class and price of walse aircaft carriers will be the most moderen and high tec aircraft carriers in history also they will be using EMALS new lunch sytem what is much better compared to the nimitz

  • The New JFK/Ronald Reagan is what I call the greatest.

  • How much does a aircraft carrier cost to build and do they defend themselfs or is it other boats and maybe submarines guarding it? I mean its pretty huge and will probably have to be defended right? Correct me if im wrong

  • @karleinararne Um it can't be destroyed until it gets nuked,it has aa turrets or sams?

  • @roju0229 Yeah, but i remember that our silent undetectable submarine sunk one of US aircraft carriers in a simulated war. I mean the submarine from Sweden that you leased.

  • @karleinararne We currently have 10 Nimitz Class Carriers in the Navy they are 4.5 billion each. An Aircraft Carrier can defend itself however it is accompanied by a Carrier Strike group, we have 11 Carrier Strike groups. A Strike group may consist of up to several dozen ships depending on the mission. Ticonderoga guided missile cruisers, Destroyers, Frigates and Submarines etc.The US Navy is no joke, avg person doesnt understand the naval power we have. By far most powerful Navy in the world!

  • @kwazykilla87 Yeah, thats what i ment. US Navy is huge and can defend itself, but however, when the Swedish stealth submarine was training with the US Navy they sunk many ships including Aircraft Carrier undetected. The purpose with the training was for US Navy to figure out a way to detect stealth submarine, i dont know if the figured it out or not. Cheers

  • @karleinararne im a research junky and did find out that in 2004 US leased that sub from the swedish navy to conduct the exercise and did in fact sink a carrier. Submarines primary purpose is to remain as undetected as possible. The sub that was used was Gotland class, its an AIP diesel electric much more advanced then a regular diesel sub. Purpose of exercise was to analyze weaknesses against diesel subs with current sonar systems. Hopefully as you said they have improved..

  • @kwazykilla87 One other thing to add the Gotland is a nice sub extremely stealthy with the diesel propulsion system that it has. However the Virginia and Seawolf class are in a whole other league of themselves with sophistication and stealth characteristics.Gotland was 250 million entered service in 1994, Virginia class 2 billion entered service in 2009. The V class attack sub has a newly developed bow-mounted spherical active/passive sonar array designed especially to track diesel subs.

  • @kwazykilla87 looks like those exercises may have paid off. awesome observation btw because i learned something new

  • @karleinararne every carrier has a little fleet around him .

  • "We fight for piece..." xD of what? oil :P

  • @Kamagel007 Or a piece of burnt China, after we've bombed them to pieces. Now, would you please stop stating anti-American, Grammarless bullshit off youtube?

  • @Tyco200 Never! Why are you so sensitive about joke and philosophical contradictory in one widely used sentence? All jokes have 50% of truth in them anyway.

    I really admire all that military power started 100 years ago with USS Langley but your blind patriotism doesn't contain any objectivity whatsoever which you should have as free young man.

  • @Kamagel007 To the US, peace goes in barrels. That's right. Now pay. Sons of bitches.

  • @stahlwerke :D

  • @Kamagel007

    it is "peace" and yes oil for us too

  • @WhyUblocMe its a metaphoricaly written. but you're right :)

  • @Kamagel007 Sigh....go find out where the US get their oil from :|

  • @Kamagel007 US interests

  • @Kamagel007 first of all it's "peace" and second of all, it's a military branch and is subject to the command of the Master-in-Chief. If you would recall, there was a certain master-in-chief that got us into two wars. One of them was almost the correct and the other one was not correct in any sense. Iraq was oil. Afghanistan was so that we would look good. I agree that the United States is run by the Military Industrial Complex and that its government will do anything to achieve goalsto that end

  • Also, the United States was not the only country that went to war in the Middle East, there was a "Coalition of the Willing" (which was a bunch of bureaucratic bull) but, nevertheless, the US was not alone. Just some food for thought.

  • To anybody who thinks that China and Russia have good navies, England has a better one. Just put that into perspective.

  • U.S.S. John F. Kennedy,best ship in the world.

  • @roju0229 U.S.S JOHN F. KENNEDY IS THE SECOND BEST SHIP. THE BEST SHIP IS THE U.S.S. ENTERPRISE

  • @FallenSecrecy U.S.S. John F.Kennedy is the HUGEST one.

  • @FallenSecrecy U.S.S John F. Kennedy was a waste of money, but it surely would've been a legend if it were nuclear. Unfortunately, due to politics, it ended up using money for fuel. :/...

  • Reminds me of the german uboat U24 sinking the USS Enterprise just a few years, ago. In a training battle..

    U24 shot a full spread of simulated torps at the carrier, from a perfect angle.. After that, the uboat surrounded several other ships and surfaced right beside the Enterprise shocking its commander.

    3 years ago, the US maine still wasnt able to detect these (old class) uboats, though it was the only US trainings goal..

    view through scope on USS Enterprise:

    /watch?v=tpmTFmMW2NA

  • You left out the USS Rendova. My father was onboard during the Korean Conflict. He was also commissioned by Admiral Hyman Rickover and went to The Marshall Islands for Atomic Weapons Testing and research. He passed away at 82 last December. Just thought ya might be interested. Cheers

  • AWSOME!!!Wait, how much do these things cost again???? :/

  • youtube is for videos!!

  • Is there a reason you were trying to cover the "bringing peace to the world" with a annotation?

  • How many aircraft carriers do US have?

  • Now put all these ships together in a port, sell them, and you easily buy Greece...

  • Awesome video.

    Some of the ships listed are shown twice. 0:10 & 3:37 USS Saratoga and 0:48 & 3:30 USS Intrepid were shown twice.

  • Bringing peace all over the world??? Fucking American imperialism!

  • @MiSmoUvekUzTebe LOL its actually a mobile piece of american cunt ;D

  • @MiSmoUvekUzTebe. Apparently you aren't familiar with the mission statement of the United States Navy. Go brush up on your facts.

  • did anyone count, how many were there?

  • US navel power is so awesome

  • lots of diplomacy. it has to make a country uneasy to know it's out there lurking.

  • @jafalks what is the name of the song that is playing in the video? and who is it by? please and thanks!

  • The picture of the USS Kitty Hawk on this video is not the right ship. That was a Nimtz class carrier in its place.

  • we not need this .. Mothership and soldier GO HOME ! peace nr 1 !! this we need NOTHING ! but this is for show .....bla bla bla bla

  • "Bringing peace all over the world."

    Now that is fucking hilarious.

  • Day 893, Food supply is running low, Still no signs of @ScrapeNow's comment

  • I can't believe they are naming our capitol ships after late Presidents. Some even living? wth? Our capitol ships should be named after the People (e.g the States) not persons. I mean what did George W. H. Bush? OMG! What the hell did he do so glorious as to have a capitol ship named after him instead of the People! I thought this power is supposed to represent the American People. Not a single individual. Sounds like the practice of tyrants!!! Empirical Presidency! What next? HALE CAESAR???

  • @Puff29646: Apparently you need to brush up on your history. George Herbert Walker Bush (get the HW part there sonny?) was the youngest commissioned Naval Aviator in WWII. He led a life in service to the United States of America. Anyone who stands in defence of freedom is 100% in my book. 

  • @obone1963 Noted. However, I am still against naming our capitol ships after individuals but by "extraordinary merit". That merit should be put to the People. Not to the Secretary of the Navy or who ever. In WW2, Battleships (capitol ships) were named after States, Carriers after famous battles, cruisers after cities and destroyers after people.

  • @Puff29646 You need to actually know more before going on youtube rampage here. Navy have different naming system for different class ships. All of current Nuclear subs are named after U.S States. Destroyers are naval leaders. Fleet auxiliary ships varies. Carriers are named after American president, which after all were elected by the people. Shout out when a U.S president actually obtain Imperial power rather than just have his name attached to a ship.

  • @TelpPov Lets get one thing straight there buddy. I do not give a damn what you say. Your argument is mute with me. I do not think capitol ships should be named after Presidents. That is final. Now that is just my opinion. But in my case the only one that counts.

  • @Puff29646 lol, typical when someone loses an argument. Why bother posting your cynical hypocritical baloney if you don't give a damn. It's obvious your opinion doesn't count anywhere.

  • @TelpPov I do not argue with trolls! I made a statement and I am entitled to it. Furthermore, it is not only mine but others as well. Capitol ships should be named after the People! Not presidents! This is the action of tyrants and an Imperial Presidency! There will be no further responses.

  • @Puff29646 only trolls make cynical and hypocritical comments on public places that are not true. Presidents do not have actual tyrannical powers. If they do, then the 11 carriers would all have the same guy's name on it not 11 different guys. Once exposed your typical liberal mind just goes crazy.

  • كس ام امريكا على اسرائيل في يوم واحد

  • let's see China makes all these carriers.

  • @ScrapeNow

    In you fucking dreams. Chinese carriers are Russian scrap metal.

  • @XKS99 really? please continue. I am ever so interested in your opinion and insight on this matter.

  • @ScrapeNow

    Ah, I mentally inserted a comma after the second world in your comment, please disregard my response (as you already appear to have)

  • @XKS99 Still able to furfil navy air power

  • @XKS99 ur gonna have to rekindle my memory here....I don't remember what I wrote

  • @ScrapeNow

    I forgot what you wrote as well . . . but I have 21 thumbs so I guess my reply covers all possibilities.

  • @XKS99 "Are u.s. scrap metal".

  • @XKS99 thats litarly right cus all chinese carriers are old russion carriers

  • @XKS99 Your right but in china's case it's quantity over quality

  • @XKS99 chinese quantity > american quality all day

  • @XKS99 Totally so lol they both only have one and they are outdated. We have 11 nuclear powered aircraft carries. In reality all these idiots whom talk about Russia and China being big dogs simply dont know what they are talking about. In a conventional war they arnt in the same league we would stampede right through them with our navy. And they have a hell of alot more to lose if it went Nuclear because of our vast national defense systems that are designed to knock out ICBM'S

  • @ScrapeNow I don't think that China will build many carriers as much as USA. It's a waste of tax money. Of course, USA won't mind to spent more on those.

  • @Chris58851 Makes sense. China itself has announced its power projection policy, and the policy is different from American style. It's more about negotiations/economics/busines­s deals instead of the American conquest/ideals/world policing style. Definitely fewer carriers.

  • @ScrapeNow Are you retarded?

  • HOO YA NAVY!!!

  • REPENT THE WORLD DO NEED

  • but cost gas-Communist need to repent

  • coSt gAS

  • gas

  • There will be a day the United States has no Carriers and im scared of of that day the way things are going

  • You for got to add  U.S.S Saipan

  • God bless the Aemes Forces of The United States of America

    the best in the world

    sankitoelkiton

    

  • bringing peace? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • @ARConFULLauto

    of course, carriers also bring peace on earth or peace to see their maker in heaven. ;)

  • i wish there was an USS Partay like in family Guy :l

  • need a better pic of the Stennis...great video, thanks!