This is just the blast of a small atomic weapon.... this doesn't take the incredible heat or radioactive effects into account either. A full on thermonuclear device would make this look like a cherry bomb.
1 tonne = 1000 kg, 1 pound = 0.453 kg so 1000 divided by 0.453 = 2200 pounds a tonne, so 2200 x 1000 = 2.2 million tonnes... in other words, this blast was less than 0.5 kilotonnes, or 500 tonnes... bah tiny blast, a nuke of that size could be launched by a shoulder fired launcher or tank shell.
Around 500 tons, although its not as strong as a 0.5kt nuke.
As you can see there a lot of flame meaning that the explosion lacked oxygen as a large part of the carbon from TNT simply burned.
Also the shockwave duration of this explosion is far lower than that of a nuke.
TNT equivalent for nukes doesnt really mean that its as strong as a certain amount of TNT exploding. What it means that it releases the energy equal that to amount of TNT. Feel the difference?
Yes I understand...There's no thermal effect too...half kton is a great blast anyway...I didn't expect a shockwave like that. I'm curious about a small yeld nuke exploding in the center of a town at street level...I am convinced that only few buildings would collapse...in all american tests they never tried a blast on a densely built area...the shockwave would be limitated in its expansion by the presence of concrete buildings.
Explosions at ground level are actually relatively ineffective.
Well, if a 0.5kt was to go off in a city... it would completely wipe out everything in about a 300m radius, a severely damaging blast wave would travel out to about 700m.
Quite a few buildings would collapse or be damaged although not from the blast but rather the ground vibrations, probably as far as several km away, not to mention shattered windows.
i think a nuke cost less of 1million of tnt....for sure a nuke is smallest.....but this was only a experimet for study nuke shockwave without radioation
ummm... there's also a massive heat blast from a real nuclear explosion... in my opnion i'd think that would be a bit damaging too. at least to organic material.
the description says 1 million pounds not tons, so the yield would be 500 tons of TNT (.5 kilo). so tsar is 114000 times the power (if my math is right)
the sound should be heard with the shockwave and not the actual explosion after all a shockwave travels at the speed of sound and sound travels at... well... the speed of sound, not light.
i know what TNT is mate I've been with defence for over 3 years and my bad, we are both right, just i have the metric system in my area, you must have imperial
no shit....its a tactical nuke simulation. nukes range from anything to the mininal critical mass which is 6kg of uranium, which is what this was, to over 100kg of uranium which is equal to a 20 kiloton blast of TNT
its 1MT not pounds! ITS 1000X10KG OF TNT. My great-uncle was there, as he was at the great central tests in South Australia in the 60's.
MontanaCheeky 1 month ago
what a waste of time and money !!!!!!!!
emiljen2 4 months ago
This is just the blast of a small atomic weapon.... this doesn't take the incredible heat or radioactive effects into account either. A full on thermonuclear device would make this look like a cherry bomb.
SayHI2TheBadGuyMang 4 months ago
But will it blend?
mentality111 4 months ago
@mentality111 FUCK NO IT WONT!!!!
MrJakethebaker420 4 months ago
that was awesome
TheToastPeople 5 months ago
We need this bomb in the middle east...
HJtheminer 7 months ago
@HJtheminer yay i live there
HDvideoedit 5 months ago
They've tested ships by using real nukes in the bikinis so why waste so much dynamite to test the fake nuke?
nadoeloiskat 8 months ago
@nadoeloiskat The cost and possible radiation poisoning to crew members. you don't need a super weapon to simulate an actual event. :)
geckoboy222 8 months ago
this is non-nuclear weapon that's awesome!
jesterjoker97 8 months ago
um..2500 pounds versus 1 million pounds...i dont think theres a comparison
branch1234 8 months ago
Wonder what a 2500 pound MOAB bomb would have done.....
Landotter1 8 months ago
iluminati
idmix 9 months ago
what were those assholes in the planes thinking? "uh....lets get a closer look hyuk hyuk!!!"
fowzie777 11 months ago
impressive simulation but a nuclear bomb would be alot more devastating then that
johan6693 11 months ago
what are those wierd smoky line things floating around after the bang?
phillipdogyface 11 months ago
the music is confusingly intense
maxymyllyon 1 year ago
Did they died?
ChErRyaVe20pK 1 year ago
0:54 - Is it UFO?????????
BaldaZlodziej06330 1 year ago
Fuck the pyramid with the eye.
Allen7111 1 year ago 4
the U.S. should take half the military budget and put it in healthcare or to make a new jobs the ppl will be happy
and if we take the cost of Iraq war money and spent it on ppl everyone will be rich
insted of searching for "Mass destruction weapons" my god it was a big joke
gasb911 1 year ago
they need to use this on the taliban :P
levski221 1 year ago
what is this to do with a lumminati symbol
amitulhoque 1 year ago
i'd plant that in a Garda station...
upthedub1 1 year ago
At 0:58 Is what surrounds the explosion watervaper made visible by the force of the blast/ sounds waves?
djrsbright 1 year ago
its the xrays being absorbed by the surrounding air
danner253 1 year ago
I thought that was a real person until they said "mannequin"
lolwtfl0l 2 years ago
This is not an A-Bomb simulation whatsoever!
Its a blast effects test using STANDARD explosives on the Shores of Hawaii
Way misleading
surfnstv 2 years ago
Comment removed
VCat2006 2 years ago
@surfnstv Don't you know what 'Simulation' means?
Spunkylorp 1 year ago
That's one hell of a overpressure wave. If you were unfortunate enough to be standing next to that dummy. Your eardrums would be blown out your ass.
ba3cool 2 years ago
1 milion pounds tnt is equivalent to how many kilotons for a nuke?
DoctorMago 2 years ago
Comment removed
freedumb2003 2 years ago
kiloton misure all kind of explosive,1 kt is 1000 ton of tnt (i don't know in pound)
Kayato601 2 years ago
I want to know how many ktons is this bomb. I want to compare this with a nuke. I think this bomb is more or less 1 kton equivalent but I'm not sure
DoctorMago 2 years ago
is only "Kt" to say kiloton
as i say before i use metrical system so i try some comversion (i can do mistake)
......i think half Kt....but not sure......
some famous nuke
Little Boy 13Kt (hiroshima)
Fat Man 20Kt (nagasaki)
Castle Bravo 15Mt (biggest U.S. nuke tested)
Tsar 50Mt (biggest nuke ever tested......russian)
Kayato601 2 years ago
1 tonne = 1000 kg, 1 pound = 0.453 kg so 1000 divided by 0.453 = 2200 pounds a tonne, so 2200 x 1000 = 2.2 million tonnes... in other words, this blast was less than 0.5 kilotonnes, or 500 tonnes... bah tiny blast, a nuke of that size could be launched by a shoulder fired launcher or tank shell.
behemuth 2 years ago
Around 500 tons, although its not as strong as a 0.5kt nuke.
As you can see there a lot of flame meaning that the explosion lacked oxygen as a large part of the carbon from TNT simply burned.
Also the shockwave duration of this explosion is far lower than that of a nuke.
TNT equivalent for nukes doesnt really mean that its as strong as a certain amount of TNT exploding. What it means that it releases the energy equal that to amount of TNT. Feel the difference?
Buuub08 2 years ago
Yes I understand...There's no thermal effect too...half kton is a great blast anyway...I didn't expect a shockwave like that. I'm curious about a small yeld nuke exploding in the center of a town at street level...I am convinced that only few buildings would collapse...in all american tests they never tried a blast on a densely built area...the shockwave would be limitated in its expansion by the presence of concrete buildings.
DoctorMago 2 years ago
Explosions at ground level are actually relatively ineffective.
Well, if a 0.5kt was to go off in a city... it would completely wipe out everything in about a 300m radius, a severely damaging blast wave would travel out to about 700m.
Quite a few buildings would collapse or be damaged although not from the blast but rather the ground vibrations, probably as far as several km away, not to mention shattered windows.
Buuub08 2 years ago
why yes i did
bria2771 2 years ago
I wouldn't put it past him!
PhattyMo 2 years ago
I farted. Excuse me.
T3sl4 2 years ago 29
@T3sl4
LMAO
GeRzAwN 1 year ago
@T3sl4 lol. You should apologize to the earth because you hurt her.
jack4026 9 months ago
I can simulate this explosion by going to taco bell, cause I bet ya I ain't gonna be running for the border lmao
Flyingfast79 2 years ago
i will put the bomb in your ass hole :)
xabangafyx 2 years ago
Just out of Curiousity, does this amount of TriNitroToluene cost as much as a Megaton Nuke?..
Crim15 2 years ago
i think a nuke cost less of 1million of tnt....for sure a nuke is smallest.....but this was only a experimet for study nuke shockwave without radioation
Kayato601 2 years ago
Anyway, that amount of explosives can still be obtained without spending a buck. Then again, same with nukes..
Crim15 2 years ago
you can fit a nuke in yo9ur ass lol
bouncingsoul100 2 years ago
wait so this explosion wasn't a small nuke at all, just tnt?
FIyboy31 2 years ago
...yes....only tnt
Kayato601 2 years ago
boom
missingno777 2 years ago
wish there was real sound
Ravenpulse 2 years ago
wow.... 1 ton of tnt is huge!!! I cant beleive the tsar bomb has 56 million tons of tnt..
CombatArmsReport 2 years ago 2
Great video, too bad about the fake sound.
kingobnoxious 2 years ago 2
ummm... there's also a massive heat blast from a real nuclear explosion... in my opnion i'd think that would be a bit damaging too. at least to organic material.
KameSama77 2 years ago
times that by 57 and u get the tsar
warr1088 2 years ago 2
the description says 1 million pounds not tons, so the yield would be 500 tons of TNT (.5 kilo). so tsar is 114000 times the power (if my math is right)
nukepwetty 2 years ago 22
yeah thats about correct.
shawnshawn426 2 years ago
@nukepwetty - actually its not even close to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs....
fowzie777 11 months ago
@nukepwetty I guess that would blow up half of North America Continent?
watsupyo888 3 months ago
@watsupyo888 there's actually a calculator for that somewhere on the internet
nukepwetty 3 months ago
@watsupyo888 actualy the tsar bomb around half of minnesota...
9911MU51C 2 months ago
@nukepwetty so would this be a equal to a 5 kiloton or a .5 kiloton nuke?
9911MU51C 2 months ago
@9911MU51C
.5 kiloton (1,000,000Ibs/2,000Ibs=500 tons/1000=kilotons)
nukepwetty 2 months ago
@9911MU51C its a "1 thousand TIMES 1 ton of tnt A thousand thousand....., ie, One Million Kilograms of TNT (EQUIVALENT)"
MontanaCheeky 1 month ago
compwiz00, how do you know the sound is fake??????
forestofrencho 2 years ago
the sound should be heard with the shockwave and not the actual explosion after all a shockwave travels at the speed of sound and sound travels at... well... the speed of sound, not light.
MartianMatthew 2 years ago 2
Thrue
Shitdudeee 2 years ago
actually, the explosive velocity at G-Zero is 6900m/s The shock wave slows as it moves, but it's still going faster than the speed of sound.
sonic=330m/s
acsempronio 2 years ago
I wonder what kinda of power of the sound this explosion must liberate.
dreadbet 2 years ago
Damn fake sound, why do they always remove the real sound?
compwiz00 2 years ago 3
DAMMMMMMM
kevinredstoneplayer 2 years ago
not 500kg lol....500,000kg. 500 tonnes...like.....50 busses packed to the roof with TNT
Individuality1990 2 years ago
holy-terrorist:>faaaaake *=*
Agentoxedo07 2 years ago
fake? I'm sorry....do you know ANYTHING about explosives?
Individuality1990 2 years ago
pounds ? wtf
where are kilotons ??
Runazarag 2 years ago
1 million pounds is about 0.4 kiloton
Individuality1990 2 years ago
thank you ::)
Runazarag 2 years ago
1 million puunds is 0.5 kiloton
ldragonheart 2 years ago
0.4... a kilogram is equal to 2.21 pounds...do the maths properly.
Well its 0.453 to be exact but yeah
Individuality1990 2 years ago
1 ton=2000 lbs, 1 kiloton 2,000,000 lbs do the math!!!!
kilogram is a different measure, kiloton is a reference to TNT--- THE EXPLOSIVE!!!!!!
ldragonheart 2 years ago
i know what TNT is mate I've been with defence for over 3 years and my bad, we are both right, just i have the metric system in my area, you must have imperial
Individuality1990 2 years ago
ya kiloton is not metric, weard i know, sad usa it still using imperial.
ldragonheart 2 years ago
00:55 ?
what are those things ?
CuteIbabanez 2 years ago
surveillance baloons
lwkleijn 2 years ago
actually, mr. narrator, nukes are much stronger than this.
mightycowhero 3 years ago
no shit....its a tactical nuke simulation. nukes range from anything to the mininal critical mass which is 6kg of uranium, which is what this was, to over 100kg of uranium which is equal to a 20 kiloton blast of TNT
Individuality1990 2 years ago
man thats insane...
they should have put some cows on the ships :D
ycats1000 3 years ago 2
lol
iamreallyhappy12 3 years ago
this explosion = .5 kiloton nuke
Craz1000 3 years ago
.5 megaton you dumbass. .5 kiloton is 500 kilos...
Aodaliyah 3 years ago
Actually it is 0,5 kilotons(500 tons).
Darvas73 3 years ago 2
lol you idiot....500kg...lol *slap forehead* a kilo ton is 1000 tones...so whats half of that? 500 tonnes...
hate to think how much tax payer money they spent that amount of explosives
Individuality1990 2 years ago
Thanks!
BTW - 1 million pounds, not tons.
DataWaveTaGo 3 years ago
Wow!
SmiertSpionem 3 years ago